Journal of Toxicology
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 4671326, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4671326

Research Article

Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapy Depressed Mitosis and Induced Chromosome Aberration in Onion Root Cells

J. I. Raji,¹ C. K. Onwuamah,² and P. G. C. Odeigah¹

¹Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, University of Lagos, Nigeria
²Centre for Human Virology and Genomics, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria

Correspondence should be addressed to J. I. Raji; joxsyraji@gmail.com

Received 28 May 2018; Accepted 31 July 2018; Published 23 August 2018

Academic Editor: Brad Upham

Copyright © 2018 J. I. Raji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Artemisinin-based combination therapy is used to treat uncomplicated malaria disease in most endemic countries. Although most antimalarial drugs are effective in killing the parasite, there is a concern of induced toxicity to the cell. Here, the cytogenotoxicity of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine phosphate (DHAP), a coformulation for artemisinin-based combination therapy, was evaluated using Allium cepa model. The toxicity on the mitotic index varies with the duration of exposure and dose tested. Chromosome aberrations observed include chromosome fragments, chromosome bridges, binucleated cells, and micronucleated cells. This study showed that DHAP can depress mitosis and induce chromosome abnormalities. Their accumulation in cells may be inhibitory to cell division and growth. This calls for caution in the administration of artemisinin combination therapy for the treatment of malaria ailment. Wide spacing of dosage is therefore suggested in order to avoid the risk of genetic damage.

1. Introduction

Currently, artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is widely used as the first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in most African countries [1, 2]. It has proven to be effective in killing the immature sexual stages of malaria parasites [3]. The provision of ACT for treatment of uncomplicated malaria has been associated with reduced Plasmodium parasite burden in different populations. In addition, low intensity of disease transmission has been reported in diverse settings that used ACT [4, 5]. The efficacy of ACT has been reported to extend to phylogenetically non-related parasitic infections such as trypanosomiasis [6]. They have also shown potent antiviral [7], antifungal [8], and broad anticancer properties in cell lines and animal models [9]. Notwithstanding its potency as a gametocytocidal agent, most of the drugs targeted at killing Plasmodium parasite have been shown to induce toxicity to the host cell [10]. In addition, some plant extracts used in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria have been shown to be toxic to the adult mosquito population [11]. Recently, ACT has been implicated in neuroauditory toxicity [12]. Similarly, dihydroartemisinin (DHA) has been reported to arrest growth in the G1 phase of hepatoma cell lines [13] and disrupted the cell cycle at G2/M in pancreatic cancer cell lines [14]. No cytogenotoxicity study has been reported for piperaquine. However, it has been shown to be non-teratogenic in pregnant rats [15]. Plant root tips have been widely used to evaluate and monitor cytotoxicity of chemical substances [16, 17]. Therefore, this study tested the cytogenotoxic potential of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine phosphate (DHAP) using the meristematic cells of Allium cepa.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Drug Preparation

Antimalarial drug containing the combination of dihydroartemisinin (80mg) and piperaquine phosphate (640mg) per 80ml was purchased from a local pharmaceutical store in Nigeria. Small volume of deionized water was added to make up 80ml suspension as directed by the manufacturer. Serial dilution of 80mg/80ml stock of dihydroartemisinin was prepared with deionized water which served as the diluent to obtain varying doses needed for the treatment.

2.2. Preparation of Test Organism

Purple variety of Allium cepa bulbs used for this study was purchased from Mile 12 International Market, Lagos, Nigeria. Physical screening was done to sort out wholesome ones and measurements such as weight (50± 3cm) and diameter (5.5± 2cm) were recorded. The bulbs were reeled off their old brownish scales and the old roots were cut off, while the primordial roots were left intact.

A total of twenty onion bulbs were selected for pretreatment. The basal part of the onion bulb was placed in contact with clean tap water contained in a 35ml capacity bottle (diameter 3.5cm) to achieve sprouting. The set-up was maintained at a temperature of 25± 1°C and relative humidity of 54± 1% for 24 hours with alternation of light (9.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.) and dark cycle (6.00 p.m. to 9.00 a.m.).

2.3. The 96-Hour Root Growth Inhibition Test

The method used in this test was adopted from [18, 19] with slight modifications. The 96-hour root growth inhibition was performed first to determine the EC₅₀ and thus obtain a good range for the test organism. The half maximal effective concentration (EC₅₀) refers to the concentration which can induce a response halfway between the baseline and the maximum over a specified period of time. With respect to this assay, the EC₅₀ would represent the concentration of the drug that would allow 50% of the root growth achieved by the untreated controls. This was determined as 96-hour semistatic exposure test using 6 concentrations of each drug. A total of thirty test organisms were used for range finding. The root lengths of the bulbs were measured with range of (24± 0.2mm) and were selected for the Allium cepa test. Five groups including the negative control were set up with six replicates each. The tap water in each bottle was replaced with 35ml of graded concentrations (1.5, 25, 75, and 150μg/ml) prepared from the stock solution by serial dilution. At the therapeutic dose, the dihydroartemisinin human plasma levels are equivalent to 1.5μg/ml. This helped select the starting dose for determining the EC₅₀.

The bulbs were grown away from direct sunlight in an inner laboratory using glass bottles each holding about 35 ml of solvent. The solution was homogenized twice daily using a glass rod stirrer at the hour of nine and six to ensure aeration. At the end of the 96-hour exposure period, one Allium cepa bulb (out of six) with the poorest root growth was discarded; this was done to reduce outlier effect and increase the chances that an effect seen is due to the drug administered. The longest of the root bundle of the remaining five Allium cepa bulbs was measured using a pair of dividers and ruler. The individual root length for each replicate was recorded and averaged. The set-up was maintained at temperature of 25± 2°C and relative humidity of 54± 1% for 96 hours with alternation of light (9.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.) and dark cycle (6.00 p.m. to 9.00 a.m.). The effect of dihydroartemisinin on root growth was investigated by comparing the concentrations and their corresponding root length and then expressed as a percentage of the root length of the negative control.

2.4. Acute Toxicity Test

Test doses (1, 0.5 and 0.25 μg/ml) were obtained from the EC₅₀ curve, calculated from the 96-hour root growth inhibition test. After the completion of the pretreatment process, the bulbs were grown in the various doses of the dihydroartemisinin for 3 hours only. The negative control (NC) group was grown in tap water for the same duration. The set-up was maintained at temperature of 25± 1°C and relative humidity of 54± 1% with alternation of light (9.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.) and dark cycle (6.00 p.m. to 9.00 a.m.). After the period of exposure elapsed, all the bulbs from the test materials were removed, gently rinsed, and grown again in tap water. The root tips samples were obtained from all replicates per dose at 12h, 24h, and 48h postexposure. The roots were preserved in a freshly prepared fixative (Methanol-Glacial Acetic Acid; 3:1 v/v) and kept cool at 4-8°C pending slides preparation Ma et al. [20].

2.5. Chronic Toxicity Test

Test doses (1, 0.5 and 0.25 μg/ml) were obtained from the EC₅₀ curve, calculated from the 96-hour root growth inhibition test. After the completion of the pretreatment process, the bulbs were grown in the various doses of the dihydroartemisinin for 48 hours only. The negative control (NC) group was grown in tap water for the same duration. The set-up was maintained at temperature of 25± 1°C and relative humidity of 54± 1% with alternation of light (9.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.) and dark cycle (6.00 p.m. to 9.00 a.m.). The root tips samples were obtained from all replicates per dose at 48h post-exposure. The roots were preserved in a freshly prepared fixative and kept cool at 4-8°C pending slides preparation.

2.6. Test for Micronucleus (MCN)

The procedure by Ma et al. (1995) was strictly followed for this study. Test doses (1, 0.5, and 0.25 μg/ml) were obtained from the EC₅₀ curve, calculated from the 96-hour root growth inhibition test. After the completion of the pre-treatment process, the bulbs were grown in the various doses of DHA for 6hrs only at room temperature of 25± 1°C and relative humidity of 54± 1% with alternation of light (9.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.) and dark cycle (6.00 p.m. to 9.00 a.m.). After the exposure period has elapsed, the bulbs were transferred into clean tap water and root tip samples from all replicates were obtained at 24h and 44h postexposure. The roots were preserved in a freshly prepared fixative and kept cool at 4-8°C pending slides preparation.

2.7. Allium cepa Recovery Studies

The onion roots were transiently grown in the test drug solutions for 3hrs and 6hrs and later removed. Thereafter, it was transferred into a bottle containing deionized water to recover [19]. Data was scored 12hr, 24hr, and 48hr postexposure of the root length. The mean mitotic index was scored and repeated for all the replicates. Root tips were harvested and fixed for microscopic evaluation. Changes were observed in the root tips length and root growth recovery was scored.

2.8. Fixation and Staining of Onion Root Tips

Roots tips were fixed in freshly prepared fixative (methanol versus glacial acetic acid 3:1). In order to prepare the root tips smears, they were transferred from the refrigerator to room temperature. Hydrolysis of the root tips was carried out in 1 N HCl for 5-6 minutes. After hydrolysis, excess HCL was drained. The terminal developing root tips of 2 mm length were cut with a sharp razor and squashed on clean slides with the pointed end of a forceps. Squashing techniques described by [21] were used in preparing slides.

The slide was then stained in a lactic aceto-orcein stain and was allowed to stay for 20 min at room temperature. When staining was completed, a coverslip was carefully placed on the slide from an angle of 45° in order to ensure even spreading. The slide was held through several folds of blotting paper with pressure applied on the coverslip to expel excessive fluids and air bubbles. The edges of the slides were sealed up with nail varnish to reduce fluid evaporation.

2.9. Microscopic Observation

Optical microscope (Olympus-CH20) was used to view the slides. The slides were viewed for cell count at X400 magnification, while photomicrograph was taking at X1000 magnification under oil immersion. Slides per dose (replicates=5) were prepared and 500-850 cells were counted using a manual counter and examined per slide under the microscope. Interphase cells were also scored for the presence of micronucleus and binucleated cells. The observed cells were scored for the different cell division stages (interphase, prophase, metaphase, anaphase, and telophase). Total dividing cells and number of cells showing chromosome aberrations under the microscope fields were recorded. Mitotic index and percentage chromosome aberration were calculated for each treatment as previously described by Adegbite et al. [22].

3. Results

3.1. DHAP Inhibits the Root Growth of A. cepa

The results of the Allium cepa root growth when treated with different concentrations of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAP) are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1. The result obtained 96h postexposure implicated DHAP as a root growth inhibitor. However, its toxicity has been observed to be dose-independent. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the 1.5μg/ml and 75μg/ml as well as the 25μg/ml and 150μg/ml when analysed using Turkey’s test. A significant difference (P<0.05) was observed between the control and the treatments (Figure 1). The estimated EC₅₀ of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) extrapolated from Table 1 is 1μg/ml.

Table 1: The 96-hour root growth inhibition test on Allium cepa after 96 h of exposure

Root Length (mm), Mean±SD

Treatment group
0h
96h

Tap Water
24±0.20
60±5.22

1.5 μg/ml
24±0.18
17±0.

25 μg/ml
24±0.13
13±0.6

75 μg/ml
24±0.17
16±0.2

150 μg/ml
24±0.15
14±0.4

Data values are mean ± standard deviation (SD) of root lengths of five determinations per group of Allium cepa exposed to different concentrations of DHAP. The negative control group (0hour) has been previously grown in water to reach about 24cm length. Figures marked with asterisks are significantly different from the negative control ( = p<0.05; = p<0.01; = p<0.001). Data was analysed by two-way ANOVA, using Tukey’s test.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1: (a) Assay set-up showing onion root tips treated with different concentrations of DHAP. (b) Picture showing onion bulbs with normal (left) and inhibited (right) root growth after being treated with DHAP. (c) Picture showing how onion root tips were measured with the aid of a ruler and divider.

3.2. Toxicity of DHAP on Root Cell Mitosis

The mitotic index (MI) observed after acute exposure was time and dose-dependent. Table 2 showed the mean values of mitotic activities observed after exposure of A. cepa root tips to varying doses of DHAP. As shown on Table 2, the mitotic index decreased significantly at 12hr postexposure (P=0.0194) and 24hr postexposure (P=0.021) with increase in concentration of DHAP at different duration. The mean MI in the highest treatment dose (1μg/ml) increased from 2.22% to 3.02% after acute exposure. However, as shown in Table 3, a significant recovery was recorded 48hr after acute exposure as the MI of the highest concentration was not significantly different from the control (P=0.178). This indicated that the A. cepa root tip cells can recover after an acute exposure and the toxicity can be reversible. Conversely, the chronic exposure had a much significant impact on the mitotic activities in the treated samples. All the treated samples showed depressed mitotic activity compared to the control as revealed in Table 3. Similarly, in the test for micronucleus as shown in Table 4, we recorded significant defect only in the 1μg/ml and 0.5μg/ml dose but not in the 0.25μg/ml.

Table 2: Mean values of mitotic activities observed after acute exposure of A. cepa root tips to DHAP.

Concentration of
12h
24h

DHAP (μg/ml)
I
P
M
A
T
TDC
TCC
MI(%)
I
P
M
A
T
TDC
TCC
MI(%)

Control
7.0
6.8
7.0
5.6
3.8
30.2
709
4.14
4.4
6.2
7.4
11.2
3.2
32.4
632
5.12

0.25
3.4
5.8
5.8
6.2
1.2
22.4
598
3.75
5.6
4.8
9.6
11.4
2.0
33.4
600
5.57

0.5
1.6
1.6
5.4
4.2
1.0
13.8
608
2.2
1.8
2.8
5.2
6.8
1.2
17.8
605
2.9

1
1.6
2.4
3.4
5.4
1.8
14.6
655
2.2
1.0
4.2
5.4
7.8
0.6
19.0
629
3.0

Mean
3.4
4.2
5.4
5.4
1.9
20.3
642
3.09
3.2
4.5
6.9
9.3
1.7
25.7
616
4.16

SD
2.52
2.53
1.50
0.84
1.28
7.84
50.8
0.99
2.16
1.41
2.06
2.35
1.12
8.39
16.3
1.38

Note: interphase (I), prophase (P), metaphase (M), anaphase (A), telophase (T), total dividing cells (TDC), total cells counted (TCC), mitotic index (MI), hour (h), and standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA analysed by Bonferroni multiple comparisons. MI (%) marked with asterisks are significantly different from the negative control ( = p<0.05).

Table 3: Mean values of mitotic activities observed after long-term acute and chronic exposure of A. cepa root tips to DHAP.

Concentration of DHAP (μg/ml)
48h (Acute)
48h (Chronic)

I
P
M
A
T
TDC
TCC
MI(%)
I
P
M
A
T
TDC
TCC
MI(%)

Control
7.0
6.8
7.0
5.6
3.8
30.2
709
5.26
5.2
2.2
11.2
11.4
2.2
32.2
546
5.90

0.25
1.6
8.0
14.6
15.6
2.6
42.4
646
6.60
5.2
2.4
8.0
4.4
1.2
21.2
610
3.4

0.5
1.2
4.2
14.0
10.4
6.4
36.2
651
5.41
2.6
1.6
5.4
6.6
1.0
17.2
626
2.7

1
0.8
3.2
12.0
11.0
4.4
31.4
648
4.80
1.8
1.0
4.6
1.6
0.2
9.2
638
1.4

Mean
2.65
5.5
11.9
10.6
4.3
35.1
663
5.31
3.7
1.8
7.3
6.0
1.2
19.9
605
3.39

SD
2.9
2.3
3.45
4.09
1.59
5.54
30.4
1.00
1.76
0.82
2.97
4.14
0.82
9.57
40.9
1.87

Note: interphase (I), prophase (P), metaphase (M), anaphase (A), telophase (T), total dividing cells (TDC), total cells counted (TCC), mitotic index (MI), hour (h), and standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA analysed by Bonferroni multiple comparisons. MI (%) marked with asterisks are significantly different from the negative control ( = p<0.05).

Table 4: Mean values of mitotic activities observed in the micronucleus test after exposure of A. cepa root tips to DHAP.

Concentration of DHAP (µg/ml)
24h
44h

I
P
M
A
T
TDC
TCC
MI(%)
I
P
M
A
T
TDC
TCC
MI(%)

Control
2.0
5.4
10.4
11.8
2.2
31.8
562
5.71
2.8
3.2
8.8
12.2
1.8
28.8
520
5.56

0.25
5.2
1.6
11.2
13.4
1.8
33.2
623
5.32
3.6
2.4
10.2
8.6
0.4
25.2
598
4.21

0.5
1.2
2.0
5.2
10.6
1.0
20.0
616
3.2
3.4
1.8
6.6
7.0
0.4
19.2
645
2.

1
1.4
2.2
5.2
9.0
0.8
18.6
619
3.0
1.8
2.0
3.4
4.0
0.6
11.8
597
1.9

Mean
2.45
2.8
8
11.2
1.45
25.9
605
4.32
2.9
2.35
7.25
7.95
0.8
21.3
590
3.69

SD
1.86
0.99
3.24
1.86
0.66
7.66
28.8
1.39
0.81
0.62
2.96
3.41
0.67
7.44
51.7
1.55

Note: interphase (I), prophase (P), metaphase (M), anaphase (A), telophase (T), total dividing cells (TDC), total cells counted (TCC), mitotic index (MI), hour (h), and standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA analysed by Bonferroni multiple comparisons. MI (%) marked with asterisks are significantly different from the negative control ( = p<0.05; = p<0.01).

3.3. DHAP Induced Chromosome Aberrations

The percentage chromosome aberration induced by DHAP in root tip cells of A. cepa after acute exposure was indicated on Tables 5, 6, and 7. Table 5 shows acute effect of DHAP 12hr and 24hr postexposure. A significant reduction in chromosome aberration was recorded 48hr after acute exposure as shown in Table 6. However, a robust percentage of chromosome aberrations was scored in the 48hr chronic exposure assay as indicated in Table 6. Similarly, the micronucleus test as shown in Table 7 revealed only two slides with the presence of micronucleus at 24h postexposure, but this is not significant after considering the number of other slides viewed. No micronucleus was detected 44h postexposure. However, we recorded different chromosome aberrations in this test.

Table 5: Mean values of chromosome aberrations observed after acute exposure of A. cepa root tip cells to DHAP.

Concentration of DHAP (μg/ml)
12h
24h

S
C-M
Br
M
F
BN
MCN
AC
TCC
DC
CA (%)
S
C-M
Br
M
F
B
MCN
AC
TCC
DC
CA (%)

Control
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
710
41.6
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
632
33
0.00

0.25
0.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
598
23.4
0.85
0
0
0
0
0.2
0.2
0
0.4
601
32
1.2

0.5
0
0
0.2
0
0.8
0
0
1.0
607
13.0
7.6
0
0
0
0
0.6
0.2
0
0.8
605
17.8
4.4

1
0
0
0.6
0
0.6
0.2
0
1.4
655
14.6
9.5
0
0
2
0
0.6
0.4
0
3.0
629
19.2
15.

Mean
0.1
0
0.3
0
0.5
0.1
0
0.9
643
23.2
4.53
0
0
0.5
0
0.35
0.2
0
1.1
617
25.5
5.3

SD
0.1
0
0.3
0
0.4
0.1
0
0.7
51.5
13.1
4.82
0
0
1
0
0.3
0.2
0
1.34
16
8.11
7.1

Note: sticky (S), C-mitosis (CM), bridge (Br), fragment (F), binuclei (BN), micronuclei (MCN), aberrant cells (AC), total cells counted (TCC), dividing cells (DC), chromosome aberration (CA), hour (h), and standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA analysed by Bonferroni multiple comparisons. CA (%) marked with asterisks are significantly different from the negative control (= p<0.05; = p<0.01;= p<0.001).

Table 6: Mean values of chromosome aberrations observed after long term acute and chronic exposure of A. cepa root tip cells to DHAP.

Concentration of DHAP (μg/ml)
48h (Acute)
48h (Chronic)

S
C-M
Br
M
F
BN
MCN
AC
TCC
DC
CA (%)
S
C-M
Br
M
F
B
MCN
AC
TCC
DC
CA (%)

Control
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
656
23.8
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
667
25.4
0.00

0.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
646
42.4
0.00
0
0
0.6
0
1
0
0
1.6
610
21.2
7.5

0.5
0
0
0.6
0
0
0
0
0.6
651
36.8
1.6
0
0
1.4
0
0.4
0
1
2.8
626
17.2
16.

1
0
0
0.2
0
0.6
0
0
0.8
648
31.0
2.5
0
0
0.4
0
3.6
0
0.2
4.2
638
9.6
43.

Mean
0
0
0.2
0
0.2
0
0
0.35
650
33.5
1.05
0
0
0.6
0
1.3
0
0.3
2.15
635
18.4
16.9

SD
0
0
0.3
0
0.3
0
0
0.41
4.34
7.97
1.28
0
0
0.6
0
1.6
0
0.48
1.78
24.1
6.73
19.1

Note: sticky (S), C-mitosis (CM), bridge (Br), fragment (F), binuclei (BN), micronuclei (MCN), aberrant cells (AC), total cells counted (TCC), dividing cells (DC), chromosome aberration (CA), hour (h), and standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA analysed by Bonferroni multiple comparisons. CA (%) with different letters are significantly different from the negative control (= p<0.05; = p<0.01;= p<0.001).

Table 7: Mean values of chromosome aberrations observed in the micronucleus test after exposure of A. cepa root tip cells to DHAP.

Concentration of DHAP (μg/ml)
24h
44h

S
C-M
Br
M
F
BN
MCN
AC
TC
DC
CA (%)
S
C-M
Br
M
F
B
MCN
AC
TCC
DC
CA (%)

Control
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
563
31.6
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
0
0.2
516
28.6
0.69

0.25
0
0
0.4
0
0.2
0
0
0.6
623
33.2
1.8
0
0
0.2
0
0.6
0.0
0
0.8
598
25.2
3.1

0.5
0
0
0.2
0
1.0
0.6
0.2
2.0
616
20.0
10.
0
0
0.6
0
1.0
0.6
0
2.2
645
19.2
11.

1
0
0
1.0
0
0.6
0.6
0
2.2
619
18.6
9.
0
0
0
0
0.6
0.8
0
1.4
597
11.8
11.

Mean
0
0
0.4
0
0.4
0.3
0.05
1.2
605
25.9
5.35
0
0
0.2
0
0.6
0.4
0
1.2
589
21.2
6.80

SD
0
0
0.43
0
0.41
0.35
0.1
1.1
28.3
7.61
5.18
0
0
0.3
0
0.4
0.36
0
0.9
53.6
7.73
5.73

Note: sticky (S), C-mitosis (CM), bridge (Br), fragment (F), binuclei (BN), micronuclei (MCN), aberrant cells (AC), total cells counted (TCC), dividing cells (DC), chromosome aberration (CA), hour (h), and standard deviation (SD). CA (%) marked with asterisks are significantly different from the negative control (= p<0.05; = p<0.01;= p<0.001).

The result revealed that most of the aberrations observed were at the metaphase and anaphase stage. Few aberrations were recorded in the interphase, prophase, and telophase. Chromosome aberrations such as sticky chromosomes, bridges, fragments, and binuclei were observed and recorded. Chromosome fragments and bridges occurred most frequently, while other aberrations were rarely found (Figure 2). The toxicological effect of DHAP was transient and there was drastic reduction in the aberrations observed after 48h. High chromosome aberrations were recorded at 12h (4.53%) and 24 (5.3%) but low at 48h (1.05%). The aberration was dose-dependent and a significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in all the treatments when compared with the mean.

Figure 2: Micrographs of stages observed after exposure of A. cepa root tip meristematic cells to DHAP. A: normal interphase, A1: binuclei at interphase, A2: micronucleus at interphase, B: normal prophase, B1: binuclei at prophase, B2: micronucleus at prophase, C: normal metaphase, C1: sticky metaphase, C2: C-mitosis, D: normal anaphase, D1: anaphase bridge, and D2: multipolar.

3.4. Root Cells Recovered after Transient Exposure to DHAP

The results observed with the recovery of root growth 24hr after acute exposure suggested that the drug could have a transient effect on the mitotic activity. In order to test this, a recovery assay was set up. Root tips were exposed to DHAP momentarily for 3hrs, 6hrs, and 48hrs and recovery was scored after 12hrs. Interestingly, a recovery was observed in the group exposed for 3hrs and allowed to recover for 48hrs as shown in Table 8. This group recorded the highest mitotic activity of 4.80% at 1.0μg/ml and least chromosome aberration (1.05%). Conversely, a group was exposed for 48hrs without recovery in water. This group scored the least in cells undergoing mitosis (1.44%, 1μg/ml) and robust 16.9% chromosome aberrations.

Table 8: Normal mitotic activity and chromosome behavior can be recovered after short-term exposure to DHAP.

Duration of exposure
Recovery time in water
Mitotic index (%)
Chromosome aberrations (%)

Control
0.25μg/ml
0.5μg/ml
1.0μg/ml

0hr
0hr
5.90
-
-
-
-

3hrs
12hrs
-
3.75
2.27
2.24
4.53

24hrs
-
5.57
2.94
3.02
5.30

48hrs
-
6.51
5.41
4.80
1.05

6hrs
24hrs
-
5.32
3.24
3.00
5.35

44hrs
-
4.21
2.98
1.98
6.82

48hrs
0hr
-
3.48
2.74
1.44
16.9

Data was analysed with regular two-way ANOVA. Data is significant different based on duration of exposure (P<0.0001) and concentrations of DHAP (P<0.001).

3.5. Micronucleus Test Revealed Defects in Chromosome Behaviour after Exposure to DHAP

The percentage chromosome aberration induced by DHAP in root tip cells of A. cepa in the micronucleus test was indicated in Table 7. The result revealed that most of the aberrations observed were at the metaphase and anaphase stage. Few aberrations were recorded in the interphase, prophase, and telophase. Chromosomal aberrations such as bridges, fragments, binuclei, and micronucleus were observed and recorded (Figure 2). Micronuclei were observed at the 24hr but was not significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the values of the chromosome aberrations observed at the 0.5μg/ml and 1.0μg/ml concentration for 12hr and 44hr. Binuclei cells (mean= 0.2) were detected in some of the controls used for the 44hr assay.

4. Discussion

The results of this study have implicated DHAP as a root growth inhibitor, mitotic-depressor and clastogenic drug. The inhibition of root growth was evoked at EC₅₀ of 1μg/ml. This is a strong indication of its cytotoxic effect on onion root cells, which have also been found for other antimalarial drugs. They include chloroquine [23], pyrimethamine [24], mefloquine [25], artesunate [26], and artemether [27]. The root growth in A. cepa has been reported to occur in the cellular differentiation region which is also known as the elongation zone [28]. Biological processes such as water uptake, nitrogen mobilization, tonoplast membrane flexibility, and increase in plasma and synthesis of sugar contribute to cellular expansion [29]. These processes are mediated and promoted by metabolites and enzymes. When these biological processes are altered, it could lead to cellular toxicity and defects in homeostatic regulation [29]. The root growth inhibition observed in this study suggests that the drug contain substances that can alter biological processes that mediate cellular processes at the elongation region.

Acute exposure to DHAP had transient effect on mitosis and the chromosome aberrations. The cells were able to exhibit recovery after the elapse of the exposure period (3hrs). This supports the report of Alin et al., [30] on the short half-life of dihydroartemisinin (1 to 3hrs) and its high rate of being easily metabolized [31]. However, long-term exposure to DHAP inhibited mitosis and induced significant aberrations in the chromosomes. The mitotic index values in the treatment were lower than the control. This suggests the mitotic activity is suppressed by the drug.

The reduction in mitosis as observed in this study implies that DHAP contains substances that have mitotic depressive property. This may occur by inhibiting DNA synthesis and formation of microtubule. Possibly, it could be an arrest of the 24h-cycle at G1 and G2 phases or disruption of nucleoprotein synthesis and low level of ATP to supply the energy required for spindle elongation, chromosomal movement, or microtubule formation [32]. However, these hypotheses require further investigation.

Similar to the report gathered from Bakare et al. [33], mitotic depression in A. cepa root cells was also recorded in the treatment but not observed in the control. Yao et al. [34] reported that dihydroartemisinin can cause disruption of the cell cycle at G2/M phase of osteosarcoma, pancreas, and leukemia cells which may have exhibited a similar mechanism of action on the root cells of A. cepa. As the research for safer antimalarial continues, it is crucial to understand the cues that attract mosquitoes to humans and avoid being bitten [35]. This study has shown that DHAP is a strong mitotic inhibitor and could give rise to mitotic abnormalities with increase in concentration and exposure time. Their accumulation in cells may be inhibitory to cell division and growth. This calls for caution in the administration of artemisinin combination therapy for the treatment of malaria ailment. Wide spacing of dosage is therefore suggested in order to prevent the risk of genetic damage. There is need for further investigation on artemisinin-based combination therapy employing mammalian assay systems in order to ascertain their genotoxic potentials and mechanism of action on mitotic index and chromosomal behaviour.

Data Availability

The data for our cell counts used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Disclosure

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

I will like to acknowledge Williams Burke G. and Oluranti Ayowale for their support during the course of the research. I want to thank Nigerian Institute of Medical Research where this research was conducted.

References

WHO, “World Health Organization, Overview of malaria treatment,” http://www.who.int/malaria/areas/treatment/overview/en/, Accessed May 26th, 2018.

I. O. Dave-Agboola and J. I. Raji, “Health-seeking behaviour of malaria patients in Lagos, Nigeria,” International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 259–264, 2018.

E. A. Ashley and N. J. White, “Artemisinin-based combinations,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 531–536, 2005.

K. I. Barnes, D. N. Durrheim, F. Little et al., “Effect of artemether-lumefantrine policy and improved vector control on malaria burden in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 2, no. 11, 2005.

A. Bhattarai, A. S. Ali, S. P. Kachur et al., “Impact of artemisinin-based combination therapy and insecticide-treated nets on malaria burden in Zanzibar,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1784–1790, 2007.

Y. V. Mishina, S. Krishna, R. K. Haynes, and J. C. Meade, “Artemisinins inhibit Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense in vitro growth,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1852–1854, 2007.

J. Paeshuyse, L. Coelmont, I. Vliegen et al., “Hemin potentiates the anti-hepatitis C virus activity of the antimalarial drug artemisinin,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 348, no. 1, pp. 139–144, 2006.

X. Ni and Y. Chen, “In vitro study of the anti-pneumocystis carinii effect of arteminsin derivatives,” Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 164–167, 2001.

M. P. Crespo-Ortiz and M. Q. Wei, “Antitumor activity of artemisinin and its derivatives: from a well-known antimalarial agent to a potential anticancer drug,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2012, Article ID 247597, 18 pages, 2012.

L. Pari and P. Murugavel, “Protective effect of α-lipoic acid against chloroquine-induced hepatotoxicity in rats,” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2004.

R. O. Akinkurolere, C. O. Adedire, O. O. Odeyemi et al., “Bioefficacy of Extracts of some Indigenous Nigerian Plants on the developmental stages of mosquito (Anopheles gambiae),” Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 237–242, 2011.

V. Ramos-Martín, C. Gonzaĺez-Martínez, I. Mackenzie et al., “Review article: Neuroauditory toxicity of artemisinin combination therapies - Have safety concerns been addressed?” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 62–73, 2014.

J. Hou, D. Wang, R. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Experimental therapy of hepatoma with artemisinin and Its derivatives: In vitro and in vivo activity, chemosensitization, and mechanisms of action,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 17, pp. 5519–5530, 2008.

H. Chen, B. Sun, S. Pan, H. Jiang, and X. Sun, “Dihydroartemisinin inhibits growth of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 131–140, 2009.

W. Min, Y. Yao, J. Yang, and Z. Hui, “Studies on reproductive toxicity and genotoxicity of piperaquine phosphate,” Chinese Journal of Pharmaceuticals, vol. 3, 1989.

J. Jaskowiak, O. Tkaczyk, M. Slota, J. Kwasniewska, and I. Szarejko, “Analysis of aluminum toxicity in Hordeum vulgare roots with an emphasis on DNA integrity and cell cycle,” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 2, 2018.

S. Verma and A. Srivastava, “Cyto-genotoxic consequences of carbendazim treatment monitored by cytogenetical analysis using Allium root tip bioassay,” Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol. 190, no. 4, p. 238, 2018.

P. G. C. Odeigah, J. Ijimakinwa, B. Lawal, and R. Oyeniyi, “Genotoxicity Screening of Leachates from Solid Industrial Wastes Evaluated with the Allium Test,” ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 311–321, 1997.

C. K. Onwuamah, S. O. Ekama, R. A. Audu, O. C. Ezechi, M. C. Poirier, and P. G. C. Odeigah, “Exposure of Allium cepa root cells to zidovudine or nevirapine induces cytogenotoxic changes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, 2014.

T.-H. Ma, Z. Xu, C. Xu et al., “The improved Allium/Vicia root tip micronucleus assay for clastogenicity of environmental pollutants,” Mutation Research/Environmental Mutagenesis and Related Subjects, vol. 334, no. 2, pp. 185–195, 1995.

A. E. Adegbite and O. Olorode, “Meiotic studies of some populations of three species of Aspilia Thouars (Heliantheae-Asteraceae) in Nigeria,” Nigerian Journal of Botany, vol. 15, pp. 74–83, 2002.

A. E. Adegbite, M. S. Ayodele, K. R. Odunbaku, and E. O. Idehen, “Mutagenic effect of neem leaf extract used in traditional medicine on Allium cepa (L.),” Scientific Research and Essays, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1315–1321, 2009.

C. C. Nwangburuka and O. A. Oyelana, “Cytological Effects of Chloroquine on Root Mitosis of Allium cepa (L.),” Journal of Life and Physical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2011.

K. K. Vijayalaxmi and M. Vishalakshi, “Evaluation of the genotoxic effects of pyrimethamine, an antimalarial drug, in the in vivo mouse,” Teratogenesis, Carcinogenesis, and Mutagenesis, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 65–71, 2000.

J. O. Akerele and E. E. Obaseiki-Ebor, “Studies on the genotoxic and mutagenic potentials of mefloquine,” Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 1, pp. 91-92, 2002.

I. Aquino, F. F. Perazzo, and E. L. Maistro, “Genotoxicity assessment of the antimalarial compound artesunate in somatic cells of mice,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1335–1339, 2011.

D. D. F. Á. Alcântara, H. F. Ribeiro, P. C. D. S. Cardoso et al., “In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of artemether, an antimalarial drug, in a gastric cancer cell line (PG100),” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 151–156, 2013.

B. A. Iwalokun, A. O. Oyenuga, G. M. Saibu, and J. Ayorinde, “Analyses of Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Potentials of Loranthus micranthus using the Allium cepa Test,” Current Research Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 459–467, 2011.

J. A. González-Reyes, F. J. Alcaín, J. A. Caler, A. Serrano, F. Córdoba, and P. Navas, “Stimulation of onion root elongation by ascorbate and ascorbate free radical in Allium cepa L.,” Protoplasma, vol. 184, no. 1-4, pp. 31–35, 1995.

M. Hassan Alin, M. Ashton, C. M. Kihamia, G. J. B. Mtey, and A. Björkman, “Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of oral artemisinin and comparison of its efficacy with that of oral artesunate in falciparum malaria patients,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 61–65, 1996.

V. Navaratnam, S. M. Mansor, N.-W. Sit, J. Grace, Q. Li, and P. Olliaro, “Pharmacokinetics of artemisinin-type compounds,” Clinical Pharmacokinetics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 255–270, 2000.

A. Majewska, E. Wolska, E. Śliwińska et al., “Antimitotic effect, G2/M accumulation, chromosomal and ultrastructure changes in meristematic cells of Allium cepa L. root tips treated with the extract from Rhodiola rosea roots,” Caryologia, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 337–351, 2003.

A. A. Bakare, A. A. Mosuro, and O. Osibanjo, “Effect of simulated leachate on chromosomes and mitosis in roots of Allium cepa (L.),” Journal of Environmental Biology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 263–271, 2000.

L. Yao, H. Xie, W. Jin, H. Hu, and L. Chen, “Analyzing anti-cancer action mechanisms of dihydroartemisinin using gene chip,” China Journal of Chinese Materials and Medicine, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 1583–1586, 2008.

J. I. Raji and M. DeGennaro, “Genetic analysis of mosquito detection of humans,” Current Opinion in Insect Science, vol. 20, pp. 34–38, 2017.