Journal of Toxicology
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 8121834, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8121834

Research Article

Decreased Insulin Secretion but Unchanged Glucose Homeostasis in Cadmium-Exposed Male C57BL/6 Mice

Xiaoyin Li, Mengyang Li, Jiming Xu, Xiang zhang, Wei Xiao, and Zengli Zhang

School of Public Health, Soochow University, 199 Ren'ai Road, Suzhou 215123, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zengli Zhang; zhangzengli@suda.edu.cn

Received 14 February 2019; Revised 30 March 2019; Accepted 26 May 2019; Published 20 June 2019

Academic Editor: Jack Ng

Copyright © 2019 Xiaoyin Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Cadmium (Cd) is a well-known toxic metal element that is largely distributed in the environment. Cd causes toxicity to most organs. Accumulating evidence suggests that Cd exposure is associated with islet dysfunction and development of diabetes, but the association remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the possible effects of chronic Cd exposure on glucose metabolism in male C57BL/6 mice. Mice were intraperitoneally injected with CdCl₂ solution (1 mg.kg⁻¹) twice a week for 24 weeks. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels and body weights were measured weekly. After 24 weeks, the intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT), intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (IPITT), and fasting serum insulin (FSI) level test were performed. The insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) and pancreatic β cell function index (HOMA-β) were calculated and analyzed. The expression of insulin receptor (IR) in mouse liver was detected by real-time PCR. Pancreatic tissue was collected for histological examination. The results demonstrated that FBG, IPGTT, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-β were identical between Cd exposure and control mice. In contract, mean fasting serum insulin level, area under the curve (AUC) of IPITT, and IR expression in livers of Cd-exposed mice decreased significantly compared with control mice. Cd administration induced islet atrophy and decreased islet area. The results suggested that Cd exposure decreased insulin secretion and maintained glucose homeostasis in male C57BL/6 mice and that pancreatic functions should be monitored in populations chronically exposed to Cd.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major contributor to global mortality and disability. The incidence of DM is rapidly growing in both developing and the developed countries [1, 2]. Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to DM development by inducing insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction [3, 4]. However, changes in the genetic factors cannot account for the rapid increase in prevalence of DM in recent decades. Therefore, environmental factors are likely the key to understanding the epidemic [5, 6].

Cadmium (Cd) is a metal element found in the earth's crust and is largely present in the environment, especially in industrial and urbanized regions. Cd is a nonessential trace element for human metabolism. However, a low-level Cd exists in the general population [7]. Individuals can be easily exposed to Cd through smoking, contaminated food or water, and occupational exposure [8]. It was reported that Cd exposure resulted in damage to the lung, liver, testes, kidney, and bone tissues [9]. Recently, Cd was recognized as an endocrine disruptor in humans and rodents [10, 11]. A growing concern is the impact of Cd exposure on the development of DM. Epidemiological and experimental studies investigated the possible association between Cd exposure and incidence of DM [7–11]. These studies have shown Cd-induced changes in islet function, insulin secretion, and insulin activity that affected blood insulin levels and glucose metabolism [10–12]. It was reported that fasting serum insulin levels were significantly decreased in Cd-exposed smelter workers compared with non-Cd-exposed workers [13]. However, the exact mechanism of Cd-induced disruption of glucose homeostasis is unknown [14, 15]. To further study the topic, the effects of long-time low-dose Cd exposure on glucose homeostasis were investigated in male C57BL/6 mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Studies

Eight-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were provided by the Animal Center of the Soochow University, as recommended by the responsible local animal ethics review board. All mice were housed in groups of five at 23 ± 2°C on a 12-h light and dark cycle. They were provided with a standard chow diet and water ad libitum. Food was only withdrawn as required for fasting.

The mice were randomly divided into two groups: control (Con mice) and chronic Cd-exposed mice (Cd mice). Each group contained 10 mice. Cd group mice were injected intraperitoneally with 1 mg/kg, twice weekly CdCl₂ (Gexin Chemical Plants, Wuxi, China) for 24 weeks, and control mice were injected with normal saline (0.9% NaCl).

At the end of the experimental period, blood was collected into plain tubes without anticoagulant by cardiac puncture under general anesthesia (10% chloral hydrate) after overnight fasting. Mice were sacrificed thereafter by cervical dislocation. The blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for 10 minutes and then centrifuged at 3000 ×g at 4°C for 10 min to obtain serum. Serum was stored at -20°C until analyzed for insulin. The pancreas was removed and placed into 4% neural buffered formalin for fixation. Other organs were removed, weighted, and stored frozen at -80°C.

2.2. Analytical Procedures

Blood for glucose levels was collected from a tail vein and measured using an ACCU-CHEK Performa kit (Roche Diabetes Care, Mannheim, Germany). Serum insulin concentrations were measured using mouse insulin ELISA kit (F5618-B, SANJIA, China).

2.3. Intraperitoneal Glucose Tolerance Test (IPGTT)

All mice were fasted on the first night of 24th week. IPGTT was performed the next morning. Mice were injected with a glucose solution (2 g/kg body weight; D-(+)-Glucose, Sinopharm Group Company, Shanghai, China) and blood glucose levels were measured at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after the glucose load.

2.4. Intraperitoneal Insulin Tolerance Test (IPITT)

On day six of the 24th week, IPITT was performed. Mice were fasted for 6 hours and human regular insulin (0.75 U/kg body weight) (Wanbang, China) was injected intraperitoneally. Blood glucose levels were measured at 0, 15, 30, and 60 min after insulin injection.

2.5. Insulin Resistance Index

The HOMA-IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, HOMA-IR) and HOMA β-cell index (homeostatic model assessment of β-cell index, HOMA-β) were calculated from the fasting concentrations of insulin and glucose to estimate the insulin resistance and β cell function [16, 17]. The equations used were the following: HOMA-IR= (FSI×FBG) ÷22.5; HOMA-β= (20×FSI) ÷ (FPG-3.5). FSI is fasted serum insulin concentration (mU/L) and FBG is fasting blood glucose (mmol/L).

2.6. Histological Examination

Pancreas tissue samples were fixed in 4% neural buffered formalin, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Embedded tissues were sectioned at 5-μm thickness and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Histological features were observed using light microscopy (CKX41, OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan). At least 25 different areas each pancreas slide were observed, and all islets were counted and measured using Image Pro Plus 6.0.

2.7. Real-Time/Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from livers with Trizol reagent (Takala). The RNA concentration was determined using a NanoDrop 2000c, Thermo. The RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using Hifair II 1st Stand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Yeasen). Real-time PCR amplification of the insulin receptor (IR) was performed using the SYBR Green Master Mix (Yeasen). Samples were run as duplicates for 40 cycles using Applied biosystems, 7500. Before the cDNA amplification, it was predenatured at 95°C for 5 min. PCR conditions were 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 50 s, annealing, and primer extension at 60°C for 30 s. Cycle thresholds were measured and the relative expression of IR gene was calculated by comparison of Ct values. Primers were designed from the respective gene sequences from Pubmed. Sequences of the primers were as follows: β-actin, 5′-TGCGCCTGCAGAGATTCAAG-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGGTAACGCCAGGAATTGTTGCTA-3′ (reverse); IR, 5′-TTTGTCATGGATGGAGGCTA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCTCATCTTGGGGTTGAACT-3′ (reverse).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Data were entered into Excel 2011 and analyzed for statistical significance using one-way analysis Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS). P values<0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Body Weight and Body Weight Gains

In the present study, exposure to Cd had no significant effect on body weight or body weight gain in mice. The mean body weights of all mice were essentially unchanged after 12th week as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Effects of Cd (cadmium chloride; 1 mg.kg⁻¹, intraperitoneal injection, twice weekly) on body weights in male C57BL/6 mice. Cd exposure had no significant effect on body weight in male C57BL/6 mice, n=5/group.

3.2. Chronic Cd Exposure Decreased Insulin Secretion in Mice

All the mice were fasted overnight and the fasted glucose and insulin at 24th week were measured. Chronic Cd exposure had no effect on fasted blood glucose (Figure 2(a)). However, Cd-exposure significantly decreased fasted insulin levels in the treated mice (Figure 2(b)). The decreased insulin did not cause the changes of glucose levels in male C57BL/6 mice.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: Effects of chronic Cd exposure on FBG and FSI (FBG: (a); FSI: (b)) levels in male C57BL/6 mice. Data are mean ± SEM (n=5/group). Significantly different from con and Cd groups, at P<0.05.

3.3. Chronic Cd Exposure Did Not Change Insulin Resistance in Mice

There were no significant differences in HOMA-IR and HOMA-β between the two groups (Figure 3). Chronic Cd exposure did not increase the insulin resistance in mice. The area under the curve (AUC) of IPGTT was identical in the two groups’ mice (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). AUC of IPITT in Cd-exposure mice decreased significantly compared to that in control mice (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)).

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: Effects of chronic Cd exposure on the insulin resistance ((a): HOMA-IR; (b): HOMA-β) in male C57BL/6 mice. Data are mean ± SEM (n=5/group).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4: Effects of chronic Cd exposure on the intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT: (a) and (b)) and the intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (IPITT: (c) and (d)) in male C57BL/6 mice. Data are mean ± SEM (n=5/group). Significantly different from con and Cd groups, at P<0.05.

3.4. Chronic Cd Exposure Induced Islet Atrophy in Pancreas

Histopathological evaluation demonstrated that control group pancreas sections had normal architecture (Figures 5(a)(A) and 5(a)(C)), whereas pancreas tissue from chronic Cd-exposed mice showed islet atrophy (Figures 5(a)(B) and 5(a)(D)). The number of islets in the pancreas sections was counted and there were no differences between the two groups (Figure 5(b)). However, the mean area of islets measured by Image Pro Plus in the Cd group was significantly decreased compared with control group mice (Figure 5(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 5: Histopathological evaluation of chronic Cd exposure (cadmium chloride; 1 mg.kg⁻¹, intraperitoneal injection, twice weekly) on pancreas tissue in male C57BL/6 mice (n=5/group) (a): (A), (B): 100×; (C), (D): 400×. Tissue samples were fixed in 4% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with H&E. (A), (C): pancreas tissue of control mice; (B), (D): pancreas tissue of chronic Cd-exposed mice showing islet atrophy. (b): islet numbers in control and Cd-exposed mice. (c): the areas of pancreatic islets in control and Cd-exposed mice.

3.5. Chronic Cd Exposure Decreased the Expression of the Insulin Receptor Gene in Mouse Liver

Real-Time-PCR showed that IR mRNA levels in the liver were decreased significantly (p<0.01) in Cd-exposed mice. The liver IR gene-expression data showed an approximately 50% decrease in Cd exposed mice compared with the control group (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Effects of Cd (cadmium chloride; 1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection, twice weekly) on mRNA levels of IR in mouse liver, n=5/group. Significantly different from con and Cd groups, at P<0.01.

4. Discussion

DM incidence is increasing worldwide. Accumulating evidence has revealed that environmental pollutants may play a critical role in this increasing [18, 19]. The present study evaluated the effects of chronic Cd exposure on glucose homeostasis in mice.

After 24 weeks of Cd exposure, FBG levels in Cd-exposed mice were identical to control mice. Cd exposure did not change glucose homeostasis in treated mice, which was further confirmed by IPGTT analysis. These results are consistent with a population study that found that Cd exposure was not associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes [20]. There are conflicting data about Cd-induced hyperglycemia. Other studies have suggested a possible link between Cd exposure and altered glucose metabolism resulting in diabetes-like hyperglycemia [19]. Several animal studies reported that Cd exposure induced hyperglycemia [21, 22]. However, the experimental conditions in these studies were different from this study. Firstly, rats were used as animal model in other studies while mice were used in our study. It is possible that mice have better compensatory functions than rats in glucose homeostasis. This could explain why Cd-exposed mice maintained normal glucose homeostasis despite decreased insulin level. Secondly, other studies were acute or subchronic exposure models. The Cd-exposure durations in other studies were much shorter compared with this study [22, 23]. To our knowledge, the present study is the longest duration study Cd exposure. Different species and durations of Cd exposure may have contributed to the different results.

In contrast to the unchanged FBG level, Cd-exposure significantly decreased the fasting serum insulin level in mice, which is consistent with previous studies [21, 22]. Distribution of Cd was not analyzed in our study, which is a limitation of our study. The pancreas is one of the major sites of Cd accumulation [24, 25]. Therefore, the reduction of fasting insulin levels in Cd-exposed mice suggests a possible direct toxic effect of Cd on the pancreas. Histological examination revealed a significant decrease in the relative area of the islets in Cd-exposed mice. The reason for the discrepancy between decreased insulin secretion and unchanged glucose homeostasis is unclear. It is possible that the changes in FSI and islet atrophy in Cd-dosed mice were too small to have a physiological effect on glucose homeostasis. There also could be other reasons that require future investigation.

What is more interesting is that Cd-exposure significantly decreased AUC of IPITT in present study. The reason for this may be that baseline insulin levels in Cd-exposed mice were less than control mice. Therefore, exogenous insulin may have greater effect in Cd-exposed mice, meaning that Cd exposure did not impair tissue sensitivity to insulin. The results of both HOMA-IR and HOMA-β also confirm the unchanged insulin sensitivity. However, epidemiological studies found significant correlations between Cd exposure and decreased insulin sensitivity [26, 27]. It has been reported that insulin insensitivity is characterized by defective insulin receptor (IR) signaling and IR downregulation is a well-established contributor to insulin insensitivity [28, 29]. However, significant IR downregulation in Cd-exposed mouse liver did not result in insulin insensitivity in the current study. To date, the topic remains ill-defined.

There are two limitations in the present study. Firstly, only one Cd exposure group was studied and the dose-response relationship of Cd could not be investigated. Secondly, the Cd content of organs was not determined. Several studies reported that the pancreas is one of the target organs of Cd and Cd exposure produced a time-dependent Cd accumulation in the pancreas [16, 30, 31]. Substantial Cd concentration in the pancreas in present long-term Cd exposure study is speculated. In this long-term Cd-exposure study, Cd-exposed mice did not show any change in body weight and obvious toxicity. It indicates that the Cd levels administered to the mice in current study were reference to environmental exposure level.

In conclusion, current study demonstrated that chronic Cd exposure decreased insulin secretion but maintained glucose homeostasis in male C57BL/6 mice, which supplemented current knowledge on the relationship between low Cd exposure and pancreatic toxicity. Further study about the effects of Cd exposure on insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis is warranted.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Xiaoyin Li and Mengyang Li contributed equally to this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773414; 81673151).

References

F. Rodriguez, M. R. Blum, T. Falasinnu et al., “Diabetes-attributable mortality in the United States from 2003 to 2016 using a multiple-cause-of death approach,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 148, pp. 169–178, 2019.

L. Huo, D. J. Magliano, F. Rancière et al., “Impact of age at diagnosis and duration of type 2 diabetes on mortality in Australia 1997–2011,” Diabetologia, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1055–1063, 2018.

Y. Kido, “Gene–environment interaction in type 2 diabetes,” Diabetology International, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2017.

N. Grarup and G. Andersen, “Gene-environment interactions in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and metabolism,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 420–426, 2007.

M. Rewers, H. Hyöty, Å. Lernmark et al., “The environmental determinants of diabetes in the young (TEDDY) study: 2018 update,” Current Diabetes Reports, vol. 18, no. 12, article 136, 2018.

T. Leff, P. Stemmer, J. Tyrrell, and R. Jog, “Diabetes and exposure to environmental lead (Pb),” Toxics, vol. 6, no. 3, article E54, 2018.

S. Satarug, D. A. Vesey, and G. C. Gobe, “Health risk assessment of dietary cadmium intake: Do current guidelines indicate how much is safe?” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 284–288, 2017.

T. L. Alderete, Z. Chen, C. M. Toledo-Corral et al., “Ambient and traffic-related air pollution exposures as novel risk factors for metabolic dysfunction and type 2 diabetes,” Current Epidemiology Reports, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 79–91, 2018.

L. Järup and A. Åkesson, “Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 238, no. 3, pp. 201–208, 2009.

C. Pirard, S. Compere, K. Firquet, and C. Charlier, “The current environmental levels of endocrine disruptors (mercury, cadmium, organochlorine pesticides and PCBs) in a Belgian adult population and their predictors of exposure,” International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 211–222, 2018.

S. Fittipaldi, V. M. Bimonte, A. Soricelli et al., “Cadmium exposure alters steroid receptors and proinflammatory cytokine levels in endothelial cells in vitro: a potential mechanism of endocrine disruptor atherogenic effect,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 727–739, 2019.

M. E. Muayed, M. R. Raja, X. Zhang et al., “Accumulation of cadmium in insulin-producing β cells,” Islets, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 405–416, 2012.

L.-J. Lei, L. Chen, T.-Y. Jin, M. Nordberg, and X.-L. Chang, “Estimation of benchmark dose for pancreatic damage in cadmium-exposed smelters,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 189–195, 2007.

A. Simić, A. F. Hansen, B. O. Åsvold et al., “Trace element status in patients with type 2 diabetes in Norway: the HUNT3 survey,” Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, vol. 41, pp. 91–98, 2017.

A. Menke, E. Guallar, and C. C. Cowie, “Metals in urine and diabetes in U.S. adults,” Diabetes, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 164–171, 2016.

S. Treviño, M. P. Waalkes, J. A. Flores Hernández, B. A. León-Chavez, P. Aguilar-Alonso, and E. Brambila, “Chronic cadmium exposure in rats produces pancreatic impairment and insulin resistance in multiple peripheral tissues,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 583, article 7022, pp. 27–35, 2015.

Y. W. Chen, C. Y. Yang, C. F. Huang, D. Z. Hung, Y. M. Leung, and S. H. Liu, “Heavy metals, islet function and diabetes development,” Islets, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 169–176, 2009.

C. Roy, P.-Y. Tremblay, and P. Ayotte, “Is mercury exposure causing diabetes, metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance? a systematic review of the literature,” Environmental Research, vol. 156, pp. 747–760, 2017.

J. Edwards and C. Ackerman, “A review of diabetes mellitus and exposure to the environmental toxicant cadmium with an emphasis on likely mechanisms of action,” Current Diabetes Reviews, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 252–258, 2016.

L. Barregard, G. Bergström, and B. Fagerberg, “Cadmium exposure in relation to insulin production, insulin sensitivity and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional and prospective study in women,” Environmental Research, vol. 121, pp. 104–109, 2013.

J. R. Edwards and W. C. Prozialeck, “Cadmium, diabetes and chronic kidney disease,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 238, no. 3, pp. 289–293, 2009.

L. Lei, T. Y. Jin, and Y. F. Zhou, “Insulin expression in rats exposed to cadmium,” Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 295–301, 2007.

R. R. Bell, J. L. Early, V. K. Nonavinakere, and Z. Mallory, “Effect of cadmium on blood glucose level in the rat,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 54, no. 2-3, pp. 199–205, 1990.

S. Onosaka and M. G. Cherian, “The induced synthesis of metallothionein in various tissues of rat in response to metals. I. Effect of repeated injection of cadmium salts,” Toxicology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 91–101, 1981.

Y. Kurata, O. Katsuta, T. Doi et al., “Chronic cadmium treatment induces islet B cell injury in ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys,” Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 175–183, 2003.

R. D. Brook, X. Xu, R. L. Bard et al., “Reduced metabolic insulin sensitivity following sub-acute exposures to low levels of ambient fine particulate matter air pollution,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 448, pp. 66–71, 2013.

G. Pizzino, N. Irrera, A. Bitto et al., “Cadmium-induced oxidative stress impairs glycemic control in adolescents,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2017, Article ID 6341671, 6 pages, 2017.

A. Nagarajan, M. C. Petersen, A. R. Nasiri et al., “MARCH1 regulates insulin sensitivity by controlling cell surface insulin receptor levels,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, Article ID 12639, 2016.

F.-H. Geng, G.-H. Li, X. Zhang et al., “Berberine improves mesenteric artery insulin sensitivity through up-regulating insulin receptor-mediated signalling in diabetic rats,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 173, no. 10, pp. 1569–1579, 2016.

H. Milnerowicz, M. Śliwińska-Mossoń, and K. A. Sobiech, “The effect of ozone on the expression of metallothionein in tissues of rats chronically exposed to cadmium,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 52, pp. 27–37, 2017.

R. Liu, T. Jia, Y. Cui, H. Lin, and S. Li, “The protective effect of selenium on the chicken pancreas against cadmium toxicity via alleviating oxidative stress and autophagy,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 240–246, 2018.