Journal of Transplantation
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 159795, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/159795

Clinical Study

Boceprevir-Based Triple Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Kidney-Transplant Candidates

Mireille Mehawej,1,2 Lionel Rostaing,2,3,4 Laurent Alric,4,5,6 Arnaud Del Bello,2,4 Jacques Izopet,3,4,7 and Nassim Kamar2,3,4

¹Faculty of Medical Science, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon
²Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, 31059 Toulouse, France
³INSERM U1043, IFR-BMT, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France
⁴Université Paul Sabatier, 31000 Toulouse, France
⁵Service de Médecine Interne-Pole Digestif, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France
⁶Laboratoire EA 2405, INSERM IFR31, 31059 Toulouse, France
⁷Laboratory of Virology, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France

Received 4 June 2015; Revised 5 July 2015; Accepted 6 July 2015

Academic Editor: P. Burra

Copyright © 2015 Mireille Mehawej et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. There are few data on the combination of (pegylated-) interferon- (Peg-IFN-) α, ribavirin, and first-generation direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Our aim was to describe the efficacy and safety of Peg-IFN-α, ribavirin, and boceprevir in hemodialysis patients. Patients. Six hemodialysis patients, chronically infected by genotype-1 HCV, were given Peg-IFN-α (135 µg/week), ribavirin (200 mg/d), and boceprevir (2400 mg/d) for 48 weeks. Results. At initiation of antiviral therapy, median viral concentration was 5.68 (3.78–6.55) log IU/mL. HCV RNA was undetectable in four of the six patients at week 4 and in all patients at week 24. A breakthrough was observed in two patients between weeks 24 and 48, and a third patient stopped antiviral therapy between weeks 24 and 48 because of severe peripheral neuropathy. At week 48, HCV RNA was undetectable in three patients. Of these, two patients relapsed within a month after antiviral therapy was stopped. Hence, only one patient had a sustained virological response; he was a previous partial responder. Overall, anemia was the main side effect. Conclusion. A triple antiviral therapy based on Peg-IFN-α, ribavirin, and boceprevir is not optimal at treating hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection. Studies using new-generation drugs are required in this setting.

1. Introduction

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has a detrimental effect on the health of persons with chronic kidney disease [1]. It leads to higher mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients compared to noninfected patients and reduces the survival rates of patients undergoing kidney transplantation as well as their grafts [2]. It renders patients with a higher risk of developing diabetes mellitus, de novo or recurrent membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, lymphoproliferative disorders, and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis after kidney transplantation [3].

Until recently, in the absence of any efficient treatment for HCV infection after kidney transplantation, treating all anti-HCV-positive RNA-positive patients that were candidates for kidney transplantation has been recommended [4].

For several years, standard reduced interferon- (IFN-) alpha or pegylated- (Peg-) IFN-α-2a, given as a monotherapy, has been the main treatment given to hemodialysis patients with HCV replication [4]. Because ribavirin has been found to be responsible for hemolytic anemia in patients with impaired kidney function [5] as well as in hemodialysis patients, it was first prohibited and then used at markedly reduced daily doses with careful monitoring for anemia and other adverse effects [1]. HCV-positive dialysis patients that received standard IFN-α or Peg-IFN-α achieved ≈50% efficacy [6].

First-generation direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs), such as the protease inhibitors telaprevir and boceprevir, have been developed over the past few years. They have been introduced as an adjunctive therapy for patients with chronic HCV but normal kidney function and have significantly improved the SVR [7]. However, scarce data regarding their use in hemodialysis patients have been published [8–10]. In addition, no data regarding the use of new-generation DAAs, such as sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, simeprevir, or ledipasvir, have been reported in this setting.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a combined therapy of Peg-IFN, ribavirin, and boceprevir to treat anti-HCV-positive RNA-positive hemodialysis patients who were candidates for kidney transplantation.

2. Patients and Methods

Between February 2013 and September 2014, six patients who were chronically infected by genotype-1 HCV and were receiving hemodialysis three times weekly, and who were candidates for kidney transplantation, were treated with Peg-IFN, ribavirin, and boceprevir as a triple therapy, after having given their written informed consent. The study was approved by Toulouse University’s IRB. The patients’ characteristics are presented in Table 1. There were three men and three women, ranging in age from 39 to 72 years (median: 49.5). Four were candidates for a second or third transplantation. Five of the six patients had previously received interferon for HCV infection: one had a relapse and the other four patients were partial responders.

Table 1: Patients’ characteristics and outcomes.

Patient 1
Patient 2
Patient 3
Patient 4
Patient 5
Patient 6

Age (years)
43
42
72
56
63
39

Gender
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female

Race
Caucasian
Caucasian
Caucasian
Black
Caucasian
Caucasian

Time on dialysis at initiation of antiviral therapy (months)
4
8
9
60
9
5

Previous kidney transplantation
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes

Previous antiviral treatment
Partial responder
Partial responder
Partial responder
Partial responder
Naïve
Relapser

HCV genotype
1
1a
1
1b
1b
1b

Initial HCV RNA concentration (log IU/mL)
4.3
5.63
6.55
5.52
5.8
5.36

Liver fibrosis at the initiation of viral therapy
F2
F2
—
F2
F1
F1-F2

Rapid virological response
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Undetectable viremia at the end of therapy
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes

Sustained virological response
Yes
No, stopped therapy at week 28
No, breakthrough between weeks 24 and 48
No, breakthrough between weeks 24 and 48
No, relapse at six months after ceasing therapy
No, relapse at one month after ceasing therapy

Decrease in Peg-IFN dose
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No

Decrease in ribavirin dose
No
No
No
Yes
No
No

Decrease in boceprevir dose
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No

Concomitant therapy
Amlodipine, bisoprolol, furosemide, calcium, and darbepoetin
Amlodipine, valsartan
furosemide, calcium, omeprazole, and darbepoetin
Irbesartan, aspirin, atenolol, simvastatin, and calcium
Calcium, aspirin, omeprazole, and levothyroxine
Simvastatin, amlodipine, and valsartan
Calcium, sevelamer carbonate, alfacalcidol, urapidil, and darbepoetin

Long-term outcome
Had received a kidney transplant at 12 months after the end of therapy and was still not viremic at 4 months after transplantation
Still viremic and on a waiting list
Deceased or on a waiting at list 3 months after antiviral therapy was stopped
Still viremic on a waiting list
Had received a kidney transplant at 1 month after HCV relapse from a HCV-positive donor and was still viremic at 6 months after kidney transplantation
Had received a kidney transplant at 8 months after HCV relapse and was still viremic at 5 months after kidney transplantation

HCV: hepatitis C virus.

Undetectable HCV RNA at week 4; undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks after antiviral therapy was completed.

Peg-IFN was given at the dose of 135 μg/week. Ribavirin was given at the dose of 200 mg/d, three times a week, after each dialysis session. Boceprevir was given at the dose of 800 mg t.i.d. There was no lead-in therapy phase. Therapy was scheduled to last 48 weeks.

A rapid virological response was defined as undetectable HCV RNA at week 4. A sustained virological response was defined as negative HCV RNA six months after the end of therapy. A virological breakthrough was defined as HCV replication during therapy and after a period of nonviral replication.

Patients were followed up every 15 days during the first month and then at three-month intervals for 6 months after therapy was completed. HCV RNA was assessed using the quantitative COBAS Amplicor HCV monitor assay (limit of detection 15 log IU/mL).

3. Results

3.1. Virological Response

At the initiation of antiviral therapy, median viral concentration was 5.68 (4.3–6.55) log IU/mL. The evolution of HCV concentration is presented in Figure 1. A rapid virological response, that is, undetectable HCV RNA at week 4, was observed in four of the six patients (66.6%). All patients had at least once undetectable HCV RNA during therapy, and HCV RNA was undetectable in all patients at week 24. However, a breakthrough was observed in two patients (P3 and P4) between weeks 24 and 48, and a third patient (P2) had to stop antiviral therapy between weeks 24 and 48 because of severe peripheral neuropathy. At week 48, overall, when therapy was scheduled to finish, HCV RNA was undetectable in three patients. However, of these, two patients relapsed within the month after antiviral therapy had finished. Hence, overall, only one patient (16.7%) had a sustained virological response: he had been a previous partial responder.

Figure 1: Evolution of hepatitis C virus RNA concentration during and after therapy.

3.2. Biochemical Response

As is usually observed in hemodialysis patients, liver-enzyme levels were within the normal ranges at the beginning of therapy and also at the end of therapy (data not shown).

3.3. Modifications and Tolerance to Antiviral Therapy

Because of fatigue and a flu-like syndrome, Peg-IFN doses were decreased at week 4 from 135 to 90 μg/week in three patients (P2, P3, and P4) and then decreased further at week 24 from 90 to 45 μg/week in one patient (P4). One patient (P2) developed peripheral neuropathy that was attributed to the antiviral therapy, which was stopped at week 28 although the patient was nonviremic.

Overall, as expected, the main adverse effect was hematological tolerance, namely, anemia. Median hemoglobin level decreased from 11.5 (range: 10–13) g/dL at the initiation of antiviral therapy to 9.75 (range: 8.5–11.5) g/dL at week 4 and to 9.55 (range: 8.8–10.8) at week 12. It then remained at 9.55 (range: 8.1–10.5) g/dL until week 24, but then it decreased again to 8.75 (range: 8.4–10.7) g/dL by week 48. At the initiation of ribavirin therapy, three patients were given recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) at the median dose of 12,000 (range: 8,000–15,000) units/week. From week 4 and until the end of the therapy, rEPO was given to all patients at the median doses of 12,000 (8,000–24,000), 12,000 (8,000–24,000), 16,000 (12,000–30,000), and 18,000 (12,000–30,000) units/week at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48, respectively.

Ribavirin dose was reduced at week 24 to 200 mg/week in one patient (P4) because of very severe anemia, despite receiving high doses of recombinant erythropoietin. Boceprevir doses were reduced at week 24 to 1600 mg/d in patient 4 and to 800 mg/d in patient 2.

4. Discussion

Within the last few years, the first-generation DAA NS3-4A protease inhibitors, that is, boceprevir and telaprevir, have been developed and used in combination with peg-interferon and ribavirin to treat patients with chronic HCV infection [11]. Boceprevir- or telaprevir-based anti-HCV therapy was first used in immunocompetent patients that had preserved kidney function. It significantly improved the sustained virological rate in genotype-1 HCV infected patients, mainly for noncirrhotic patients [7].

In hemodialysis patients, the recommended treatment for chronic HCV infection remains standard or pegylated-interferon [4]. As pointed out in a meta-analysis by Fabrizi et al., the SVR response was 39% after standard IFN-α therapy and 31% when Peg-IFN-α was used [6]. The dropout rates were, respectively, 19% and 27% [6]. In other studies, although ribavirin accumulates in hemodialysis patients and causes severe hemolytic anemia [5], low doses of ribavirin, that is, 200 mg/day or 200 mg every other day, when added to interferon, improved the SVR [1]. The SVR ranged from 17 to 70%, and the dropout rate was up to 50% [1].

Boceprevir- or telaprevir-based anti-HCV therapy has been used in a small number of hemodialysis patients. Dumortier et al. treated four hemodialysis patients with a combined therapy of Peg-IFN-α, ribavirin, and telaprevir [8]. Three of their four patients achieved viral clearance at week 12; however, no further outcomes were reported, and the number of SVRs is unknown. Wiegand et al. treated seven hemodialysis patients with Peg-IFN-α, ribavirin, and telaprevir [9]: the duration of treatment ranged from 24 to 47 weeks. A SVR was observed in six of their seven patients [9]. Finally, Knapstein et al. successfully treated a hemodialysis patient with Peg-IFN-α, ribavirin, and boceprevir for 48 weeks [10].

In the present study, six patients were given Peg-IFN-α, ribavirin, and boceprevir for 48 weeks. Antiviral therapy was stopped in one patient because of severe neuropathy, which was attributed to the interferon therapy. Two breakthrough events were observed in two patients, which required doses of antiviral drugs to be reduced because of adverse events. Overall, three patients were cleared of the virus by the end of therapy. However, two of these patients then relapsed one month and six months after treatment was finished. Hence, overall, only one patient had a sustained virological response.

Eight of the 14 hemodialysis patients that received antiviral triple therapy, who had a sufficiently long follow-up, and were included in either a previously published series or in the present study, had a sustained virological response (57%). The poor results observed in our study are probably related to poor tolerance to the antiviral therapy, which required dose reductions. Similar to previous studies, the main side effect observed in our study was anemia, which required the introduction of rEPO, or an increased dose of rEPO plus blood transfusions. Hence, this triple-therapy strategy did not effectively treat our hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection.

Very recently, the use of new-generation DAAs, that is, sofosbuvir combined with daclatasvir, simeprevir, or ledipasvir, has been shown to be highly efficient at treating HCV infection in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic immunocompetent patients [12–16], in liver-transplant patients [17–19] and in some kidney-transplant patients [20]. Individually, daclatasvir, simeprevir, and ledipasvir can be eliminated by the liver and so can be given to hemodialysis patients. However, no data regarding the use of sofosbuvir in patients with a glomerular-filtration rate <30 mL/min exist: hence, a combination of daclatasvir, simeprevir, or ledipasvir is still not recommended in this setting. A phase-II multicenter study has assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination of grazoprevir (MK-5172) and elbasvir (MK-8742) given to patients with chronic hepatitis and chronic kidney disease, including hemodialysis patients (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02092350).

In summary, a triple antiviral therapy based on Peg-IFN-α, ribavirin, and either telaprevir or boceprevir did not optimally treat hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection. Studies using new-generation drugs are required in this population as well as for kidney-transplant patients.

Conflict of Interests

No conflict of interests exists.

References

N. Perico, D. Cattaneo, B. Bikbov, and G. Remuzzi, “Hepatitis C infection and chronic renal diseases,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 207–220, 2009.

L. Rostaing, L. Alric, J. Izopet, and N. Kamar, “What are the management issues for hepatitis C in dialysis patients? Hepatitis C virus infection and its treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease,” Seminars in Dialysis, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 451–455, 2014.

N. Kamar, D. Ribes, J. Izopet, and L. Rostaing, “Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) after renal transplantation: implications for HCV-positive dialysis patients awaiting a kidney transplant,” Transplantation, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 853–856, 2006.

National Kidney Foundation, “Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO),” Kidney International, no. 109, pp. S1–S99, 2008.

N. Kamar, E. Chatelut, E. Manolis, T. Lafont, J. Izopet, and L. Rostaing, “Ribavirin pharmacokinetics in renal and liver transplant patients: evidence that it depends on renal function,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 140–146, 2004.

F. Fabrizi, V. Dixit, P. Messa, and P. Martin, “Interferon monotherapy of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials,” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 79–88, 2008.

C. Park, S. Jiang, and K. A. Lawson, “Efficacy and safety of telaprevir and boceprevir in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2014.

J. Dumortier, O. Guillaud, M.-C. Gagnieu et al., “Anti-viral triple therapy with telaprevir in haemodialysed HCV patients: Is it feasible?” Journal of Clinical Virology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 146–149, 2013.

J. Wiegand, B. Maasoumy, P. Buggisch et al., “Letter: telaprevir triple therapy in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients receiving haemodialysis,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1342–1344, 2014.

J. Knapstein, P. R. Galle, and T. Zimmermann, “Antiviral triple therapy with boceprevir in a chronic hepatitis C haemodialysis patient awaiting kidney re-transplantation,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 88–89, 2014.

N. Shah, T. Pierce, and K. V. Kowdley, “Review of direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C,” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1107–1121, 2013.

M. S. Sulkowski, D. F. Gardiner, M. Rodriguez-Torres et al., “Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir for previously treated or untreated chronic HCV infection,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 370, no. 3, pp. 211–221, 2014.

E. Lawitz, M. S. Sulkowski, R. Ghalib et al., “Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, to treat chronic infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in non-responders to pegylated interferon and ribavirin and treatment-naive patients: the COSMOS randomised study,” The Lancet, vol. 384, no. 9956, pp. 1756–1765, 2014.

K. V. Kowdley, S. C. Gordon, K. R. Reddy et al., “Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks for chronic HCV without cirrhosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 370, no. 20, pp. 1879–1888, 2014.

N. Afdhal, K. R. Reddy, D. R. Nelson et al., “Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 370, no. 16, pp. 1483–1493, 2014.

N. Afdhal, S. Zeuzem, P. Kwo et al., “Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 370, no. 20, pp. 1889–1898, 2014.

X. Forns, M. Charlton, J. Denning et al., “Sofosbuvir compassionate use program for patients with severe recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation,” Hepatology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1485–1494, 2015.

M. Charlton, E. Gane, M. P. Manns et al., “Sofosbuvir and ribavirin for treatment of compensated recurrent hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation,” Gastroenterology, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 108–117, 2015.

M. P. Curry, X. Forns, R. T. Chung et al., “Sofosbuvir and ribavirin prevent recurrence of HCV infection after liver transplantation: an open-label study,” Gastroenterology, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 100.e1–107.e1, 2015.

C. Delabaudière, L. Lavayssière, G. Dörr et al., “Successful treatment of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis with pegylated interferon, ribavirin and sofosbuvir after a combined kidney-liver transplantation,” Transplant International, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 255–258, 2015.