Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 5147571, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5147571

Research Article

Dalbergioidin Ameliorates Doxorubicin-Induced Renal Fibrosis by Suppressing the TGF-β Signal Pathway

Xianguo Ren,1,2 Yun Bo,³ Junting Fan,⁴ Maosheng Chen,⁵ Daliang Xu,6,7 Yang Dong,6,7 Haowei He,⁸ Xianzhi Ren,⁷ Rong Qu,6,7 Yulian Jin,6,7 Weihong Zhao,³ and Changliang Xu1,7

¹National Clinical Research Center of Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China
²Department of Pediatrics, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China
³Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
⁴School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
⁵Department of Nephrology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, China
⁶Department of Nephrology, Anhui Provincial Children’s Hospital, Hefei, China
⁷Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
⁸Department of Urology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China

Received 5 July 2016; Accepted 21 November 2016

Academic Editor: Lin Deng

Copyright © 2016 Xianguo Ren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

We investigated the effect of Dalbergioidin (DAL), a well-known natural product extracted from Uraria crinita, on doxorubicin- (DXR-) induced renal fibrosis in mice. The mice were pretreated for 7 days with DAL followed by a single injection of DXR (10 mg/kg) via the tail vein. Renal function was analyzed 5 weeks after DXR treatment. DXR caused nephrotoxicity. The symptoms of nephrotic syndrome were greatly improved after DAL treatment. The indices of renal fibrosis, the phosphorylation of Smad3, and the expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), fibronectin, collagen III (Col III), E-cadherin, TGF-β, and Smad7 in response to DXR were all similarly modified by DAL. The present findings suggest that DAL improved the markers for kidney damage investigated in this model of DXR-induced experimental nephrotoxicity.

1. Introduction

Doxorubicin (DXR) is an anthracycline glycoside antibiotic that has broad-spectrum antitumor activity against a variety of human solid tumors—such as ovarian, breast, and lung cancers—as well as several other cancers and hematologic malignancies [1–3]. However, DXR does not discriminate between cancer and normal cells and eradicates not only fast-growing cancer cells but also other rapidly growing cells in the body; therefore, its use in chemotherapy has been restricted. DXR has a variety of toxicities, including cardiac, hepatic, renal, and hematologic toxicity [4–8]. Although the mechanism underlying the severe cytotoxicity from DXR is not fully understood, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are assumed to be a key factor. It is very important to understand the events controlling this oxidative injury. DXR treatment leads to the overproduction of hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen peroxide, and superoxide anions, which cause membrane lipid peroxidation [9]. Therefore, increasing data suggest that simultaneous treatment with DXR and an antioxidant may alleviate the toxicity of DXR.

Uraria crinite, which has some great health benefits, is widely distributed throughout India, Thailand, Indonesia, and China. It has long been used as a herbal medicine, having bioactive properties, such as antioxidant activity, antiulcer effects, and osteogenic activity. Its roots, because of their anti-inflammatory activity, have also been used to treat chills, edema, and stomachache [10, 11]. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of Dalbergioidin (DAL), a well-known anthocyanin from Uraria crinita, on DXR-induced renal fibrosis in mice. The study was performed to determine whether treatment with DAL could counteract renal fibrosis induced by DRX in vivo. We also investigated DAL’s mechanism of action.

2. Methods

2.1. Reagents

DAL was purchased from BioBioPha Co., Ltd. SMAD3, p-SMAD3, SMAD7, α-SMA, fibronectin, Col I, E-cadherin, and TGF-β were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Bovine serum albumin (BSA), DXR, sodium hydroxide, ferric nitrate, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and perchloric acid (PCA) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.2. Animals

The mice were housed and used as previously described [12].

2.3. Experimental Procedure

The mice were randomly divided into 3 groups of 8 mice each. Group I served as the control group for 42 days. Group II served as the model group and received a single IV injection of DXR (10 mg/kg) on day 7. Group III served as the treatment group and was pretreated with DAL (30 mg/kg IP) for 42 days; on day 7, a single IV injection of DXR (10 mg/kg) was administered. On day 42, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and, after perfusion to evaluate the various biochemical parameters, kidney and blood samples were taken.

2.4. Measurement of Urine and Plasma

Urine and blood samples were collected as previously described [13]. Urine albumin, plasma triglyceride levels, plasma urea levels, and serum creatinine levels were determined using commercial kits, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Exocell), a Urea Nitrogen Direct Kit (Stanbio Laboratory), a LabAssay Triglyceride ELISA Kit (Wako), and a Creatinine Liquicolor Kit (Stanbio Laboratory).

2.5. Masson-Trichrome Staining

Masson-trichrome staining was done as previously described [14].

2.6. Determination of GSH In Vivo

The effect of DAL treatment on Glutathione (GSH) levels was evaluated using a commercial kit (Cayman Chemical Co.) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.7. Determination of MDA Levels In Vivo

The lipid peroxidation of the kidney tissue was studied by measuring the malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in a colorimetric method involving thiobarbituric acid (TBA) adduct formation. MDA was measured by a commercial TBARS Assay Kit (Cayman Chemical Co.) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.8. Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT–PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from the cells using a commercial TRIzol reagent kit (Invitrogene); the RNA concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically. The first cDNA synthesis was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions (Takara, JPN). The specific primers for fibronectin, α-SMA, E-cadherin, Col III, SMAD7, TGF-β, and GAPDH (loading control) were as follows:

fibronectin: sense 5′-CGAGGTGACAGAGACCACAA-3′, antisense 5′-CTGGAGTCAAGCCAGACACA-3′; α-SMA: sense 5′-TGTGCTGGACTCTGGAGATG-3′, antisense 5′-ATGTCACGGACAATCTCACG-3′; E-cadherin: sense 5′-AATGGCGGCAATGCAATCCCAAGA-3′, antisense 5′-TGCCACAGACCGATTGTGGAGATA-3′; Col III: sense 5′-AGGCAACAGTGGTTCTCCTG-3′, antisense 5′-GACCTCGTGCTCCAGTTAGC-3′; smad7: sense 5′-AGGTGTTCCCCGGTTTCTCCA-3′; antisense: 5′-TTCACAAAGCTGATCTGCACGGT-3′; TGF-β: sense 5′-GCAACATGTGGAACTCTACCAGAA-3′, antisense 5′-GACGTCAAAAGACAGCCACTCA-3′; GAPDH: sense 5′-AACTTTGGCATTGTGGAAGG-3′, antisense 5′-ACACATTGGGGGTAGGAACA-3′. The protocol was as follows: 50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 10 minutes, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, and 60°C for 30 seconds.

2.9. Western Blot Analyses

Using the western blotting method as previously described [12], the tissues were homogenized and the supernatant was then decanted. First antibodies were added and incubated with membranes at 4°C overnight. HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were diluted and incubated with the membranes at 20°C. The blots were then incubated with a chemiluminescent substrate (Millipore) and exposed to Kodak Film.

2.10. ELISA Assay

TGF-β was measured using a TGF-β ELISA Quantitation Kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (R & D, Inc.).

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Differences between the groups were analyzed by Student’s -test. All the data points are presented as the treatment group’s mean  ±  standard deviation (SD) of the mean. values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of DAL on Renal Dysfunction

As shown in Figure 1(a), the 24-hour urinary protein excretion of the mice progressively increased after the injection of DXR. On day 21, the urinary protein of the DXR-treated mice was significantly higher than that of the control mice. Beginning on day 28, the urinary protein of DXR-treated mice rapidly increased. Treatment with DAL significantly decreased urinary protein at the weeks 5 and 6. The DXR-treated mice developed severe hyperlipidemia (plasma triglyceride  mg/mL), which was less severe in the treatment group (plasma triglyceride  mg/mL) (Figure 1(b)). The treatment of mice with DXR caused a significant increase in BUN and plasma creatinine levels by 2.3- and 4.1-fold, respectively, compared with the control group (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). Pretreatment with DAL for 7 days resulted in the restoration of BUN and plasma creatinine to near control levels (). Therefore, DAL attenuates nephrotoxicity in a mouse model of DXR.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 1: Kidney injury at 5 weeks after DXR injection in different groups of mice as indicated. (a) Effect of DAL on albuminuria against DXR-induced nephrotoxicity; (b) effect of DAL on hyperlipidemia against DXR-induced nephrotoxicity; (c) effect of DAL on blood urea nitrogen (BUN) against DXR-induced nephrotoxicity; (d) effect of DAL on serum creatinine against DXR-induced nephrotoxicity. The control and DAL treatment groups are compared with the DXR group. Values are statistically significant at ; the DXR group is compared with the control group. Values are statistically significant at .

3.2. Effect of DAL on Renal Fibrosis

Like many other organ systems, the kidney stiffens after injury, a process increasingly recognized as an important driver of renal fibrosis [15]. To correlate the reduction of kidney injury with the effect of the drug treatments, renal fibrosis was assessed by Masson staining (Figure 2(a)). The renal fibrosis marker of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), fibronectin, and the epithelial cell marker of E-cadherin were assessed by western blotting [16, 17]. Consistent with the albuminuria data, the results from the DXR mice showed marked renal fibrosis, as evidenced by the increased expression of fibroblasts markers (Figures 2(b)–2(d)). The treatment of mice with DXR caused a significant increase in the renal protein expression of well-known fibroblasts markers and increased the expression of E-cadherin in renal tissue (Figures 2(b)–2(d)). DAL ameliorates renal fibrosis in a mouse model of DXR.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2: Renal fibrosis at 5 weeks after DXR injection in different groups of mice as indicated. (a) Kidney sections were subjected to Masson-trichrome staining; (b) kidney sections expressed the mRNA of α-SMA, and E-cadherin, fibronectin; (c) kidney sections expressed the protein of α-SMA, E-cadherin, and fibronectin; (d) the relative protein expression of fibronectin, α-SMA, and E-cadherin as seen in the kidney sections. The control and DAL treatment groups are compared with the DXR group. Values are statistically significant at ; the DXR group is compared with the control group. Values are statistically significant at .

3.3. Effect of DAL on Kidney Redox Potential

The elevated production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a primary mechanism of DXR-induced cytotoxicity [18, 19]. MDA and GSH serve to assess the level of ROS. In this study, there was a significant increase of MDA in the kidneys of the DXR group compared with the control group (). Compared with the DXR group, the mice with DXR-induced nephrotoxicity that were treated with DAL showed a significant reduction in MDA levels (Figure 3(a)). We also measured the GSH concentration as an indicator of cellular redox status in the kidney tissue to investigate the antioxidant action of DAL. After the DXR treatment, the levels of GSH were significantly depleted, as shown in Figure 3(b) (). Compared with the DXR group, the group that received DAL showed a significantly reversed GSH depletion. This shows that DAL maintains the redox balance of kidney tissue.

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: Redox microenvironment in kidney tissue at 5 weeks after DXR injection in different groups of mice as indicated. (a) Effect of DAL on kidney MDA levels; (b) Effect of DAL on kidney GSH levels. The control and DAL treatment groups are compared with the DXR group. Values are statistically significant at ; the DXR group is compared with the control group. Values are statistically significant at .

3.4. DAL Effects on the TGF-β Signaling Pathway

TGF-β is a key mediator in the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis and induces renal scarring largely by activating its downstream Smad signaling pathway [20]. Although the TGF-β signaling pathway is mediated by Smad2 and Smad3, Smad2 protects against TGF-beta/Smad3-mediated renal fibrosis [21]. Thus, phosphorylated Smad3 is the effector of TGF-β-mediated renal fibrosis. The levels of phosphorylated Smad3 in the kidney were increased by DXR (Figure 4(a)). As shown in Figure 4(a), the DAL-treated groups exhibited a significant decrease in the phosphorylation level of SMAD3 compared with the DXR groups (). Because collagen III is a target gene of TGF-beta/SMAD3, the mRNA and protein expression of collagen III in the kidney was evaluated by q-PCR and western blotting. As shown in Figures 4(b) and 4(c), collagen III mRNA and protein levels in the DAL-treated groups showed a significant decrease compared with those in the DXR groups. Smad7 acts as an antagonist of the TGF-β signaling pathway by preventing R-Smads from interacting with their receptors or by competing with Co-Smads for the generation of R-Smad/Co-Smad complexes [22, 23]. Smad7 mRNA and protein levels were reduced after DXR treatment, but this effect was reversed by DAL treatment (; Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). DAL suppresses the TGF-β signaling pathway in kidney tissue.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 4: The TGF-β signaling pathway in kidney tissue 5 weeks after DXR injection in different groups of mice as indicated. (a) DAL inhibits the phosphorylation of Smad3; (b) DAL inhibits the gene expression of collagen III, which is the target gene of Smad3; (c) DAL inhibits the protein expression of collagen III, which is the target protein expression of Smad3. The control and DAL treatment groups are compared with the DXR group. Values are statistically significant at ; the DXR group is compared with the control group. Values are statistically significant at .

(a)

(b)

Figure 5: The expression of Smad7, an inhibitor of the TGF-β signaling pathway, in kidney tissue 5 weeks after DXR injection in different groups of mice as indicated. (a) DAL increases the gene expression of Smad7; (b) DAL increases the protein expression of Smad7. The control and DAL treatment groups are compared with the DXR group. Values are statistically significant at ; the DXR group is compared with the control group. Values are statistically significant at .

3.5. Effect of DAL on TGF-β Protein Expression

TGF-β is a protein that controls proliferation, cellular differentiation, and other functions in most cells. TGF-β is important for the induction of fibrosis and the EMT often associated with the chronic phases of inflammatory diseases [24]. As shown in Figure 6, the mRNA and protein levels of TGF-β in the DAL-treated groups showed a significant decrease compared with those in the DXR-treated groups.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 6: The expression of TGF-β in kidney tissue 5 weeks after DXR injection in different groups of mice as indicated. (a) DAL decreases the gene expression of TGF-β; (b) DAL decreases the protein expression of TGF-β by ELISA; (c) DAL decreases the protein expression of TGF-β as determined by western blotting. The control and DAL treatment groups are compared with the DXR group. Values are statistically significant at ; the DXR group is compared with the control group. Values are statistically significant at .

4. Discussion

In the current study, DAL ameliorated the severe nephritic syndrome induced by DXR in mice. Urine albumin and plasma urea and creatinine are the most sensitive markers of nephrotoxicity implicated in the diagnosis of renal injury [25, 26]. DXR treatment significantly increased serum creatinine, BUN, and hyperlipidemia. In contrast, treatment with DAL resulted in a significant decrease of these parameters in the DXR-treated animals. These results indicate that DAL may offer a considerable nephroprotective effect against DXR toxicity.

Renal fibrosis is a well-known cause of kidney failure in DXR-induced nephropathy [27]. Several cellular pathways, including fibroblast activation and tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transition, have been identified as the major causes of renal fibrosis [28]. In this study, the administration of DAL significantly improved renal fibrosis. One of the major mechanisms in the protection of DAL in this model involves the inhibition of fibroblast activation. After 35 days of DXR injection, fibronectin and α-SMA mRNA and protein levels were markedly upregulated and DAL significantly inhibited their levels of expression. We also examined the mRNA and protein levels of the epithelial marker E-cadherin. DAL treatment reversed the reduction of E-cadherin. Consistent with these results histologically, DAL treatment ameliorated DXR-induced renal fibrosis.

TGF-β, which is upregulated in some studies, plays a pivotal role in the progression of the tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transition in renal fibrosis; therapeutic intervention targeting TGF-β has been successful and well tolerated in animal models [9, 21, 23]. It has recently been postulated that ROS mediate fibrosis via a TGF-β-dependent pathway [29, 30]. Moreover, ROS have emerged in the pathogenesis of DXR-induced nephropathy [31, 32]. It has been suggested that a DXR semiquinone plays a major role in DXR nephrotoxicity. Although semiquinones have a short life, they initiate a stream of reactions, producing ROS after interacting with molecular oxygen [5, 33]. It has been shown that DXR increases the production of free radicals such as superoxide, hydroxyl radicals, and hydrogen peroxide, which have a great ability to react rapidly with lipids and cause lipid hydroperoxide (LPO) [9]. LPO is known to be one of the toxic manifestations of DXR ingestion; its presence is determined by measuring MDA levels. Excessive LPO has been reported in the kidneys of DXR-treated mice [34]. In the current study, the DXR-treated mice showed increased levels of MDA compared with the control mice. GSH is the most important thiol-containing antioxidant, and it plays a pivotal role in preventing oxidative damage [35, 36]. GSH has also been used as a biomarker of oxidative stress in biological systems [37]. The depletion of GSH has been observed in DXR mice [34]. In our studies, DAL decreased the concentrations of MDA and increased the level of GSH. The recovering redox balance in the tissue microenvironment is the most likely mechanism by which DAL exerts nephroprotective effect and inhibits a tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Smad3 is a critical downstream mediator responsible for the biological effects of TGF-β, and their related family members regulate the transcription of several hundred genes. In the context of renal fibrosis, Smad3 are strongly activated in both experimental and human kidney diseases [20]. Phosphorylated Smad3 is increased in the DXR group. This observation indicates that TGF-β/Smad signaling pathways are activated in DXR-induced nephropathy. However, this phenomenon is reversed by DAL. Collagen I, which is a fibrogenic gene, is the downstream target of the TGF-β/Smad3 signaling pathway. DAL reversed the increase of collagen I. Furthermore, Smad7, which is an inhibitor of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathways, was upregulated by DAL treatment. DAL also increases the mRNA and protein expression of TGF-β in DXR-induced nephropathy.

In conclusion, our results demonstrate that DAL has a potent nephroprotective effect in the DXR mice model. The nephroprotective effect of DAL may be mediated by suppressing the TGF-β-induced renal tubular epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. This is an early-stage study of the nephroprotective effects of DAL; the detailed mechanisms of action need further clarification.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Changliang Xu had the initial idea for the project. Xianguo Ren, Yun Bo, Junting Fan, and Maosheng Chen did all the experimental work. Weihong Zhao provided guidance throughout the work. Haowei He, Xianzhi Ren, Rong Qu, and Yulian Jin analyzed the experimental data. Daliang Xu and Yang Dong gave some suggestions about how to arrange the figures. Changliang Xu drafted the manuscript. Changliang Xu and Maosheng Chen provided funding. Xianguo Ren, Yun Bo, Junting Fan, and Maosheng Chen contributed equally to this work and are to be considered first authors.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81302829) and the Major Program of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Zhejiang Province, China (no. 2015ZZ002).

References

P. W. Burridge, Y. F. Li, E. Matsa et al., “Human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes recapitulate the predilection of breast cancer patients to doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity,” Nature Medicine, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 547–556, 2016.

C.-H. Lai, K.-S. Park, D.-H. Lee et al., “HSP-90 inhibitor ganetespib is synergistic with doxorubicin in small cell lung cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 33, no. 40, pp. 4867–4876, 2014.

J. Brucker, C. Mayer, G. Gebauer et al., “Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: a multicentric phase II trial,” Oncology Letters, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1211–1215, 2016.

R. Injac, M. Boskovic, M. Perse et al., “Acute doxorubicin nephrotoxicity in rats with malignant neoplams can be successfully treated With fullerenol C60(OH)24 via suppresion of oxidative stress,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 742–749, 2008.

M. Mohan, S. Kamble, P. Gadhi, and S. Kasture, “Protective effect of Solanum torvum on doxorubicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 436–440, 2010.

S. Yilmaz, A. Atessahin, E. Sahna, I. Karahan, and S. Ozer, “Protective effect of lycopene on adriamycin-induced cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity,” Toxicology, vol. 218, no. 2-3, pp. 164–171, 2006.

H. C. Lai, Y. C. Yeh, L. C. Wang et al., “Propofol ameliorates doxorubicin-induced oxidative stress and cellular apoptosis in rat cardiomyocytes,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 257, no. 3, pp. 437–448, 2011.

V. G. Desai, E. H. Herman, C. L. Moland et al., “Development of doxorubicin-induced chronic cardiotoxicity in the B6C3F1 mouse model,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 266, no. 1, pp. 109–121, 2013.

E. Öz and M. N. Ilhan, “Effects of melatonin in reducing the toxic effects of doxorubicin,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 286, no. 1-2, pp. 11–15, 2006.

Y.-W. Mao, R.-D. Lin, H.-C. Hung, and M.-H. Lee, “Stimulation of osteogenic activity in human osteoblast cells by edible uraria crinita,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 24, pp. 5581–5588, 2014.

P.-D. Duh, G.-C. Yen, W.-J. Yen, and L.-W. Chang, “Antioxidant effects of water extracts from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) prepared under different roasting temperatures,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1455–1463, 2001.

D. Xu, M. Chen, X. Ren, X. Ren, and Y. Wu, “Leonurine ameliorates LPS-induced acute kidney injury via suppressing ROS-mediated NF-κB signaling pathway,” Fitoterapia, vol. 97, pp. 148–155, 2014.

S. Liu, Z. Jia, L. Zhou et al., “Nitro-oleic acid protects against adriamycin-induced nephropathy in mice,” American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology, vol. 305, no. 11, pp. F1533–F1541, 2013.

H. Sugimoto, G. Grahovac, M. Zeisberg, and R. Kalluri, “Renal fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis in a new mouse model of diabetic nephropathy and its regression by bone morphogenic protein-7 and advanced glycation end product inhibitors,” Diabetes, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1825–1833, 2007.

S. G. Szeto, M. Narimatsu, M. Lu et al., “YAP/TAZ are mechanoregulators of TGF-β-Smad signaling and renal fibrogenesis,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 3117–3128, 2016.

M. Zeisberg and E. G. Neilson, “Biomarkers for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 1429–1437, 2009.

T. L. Criswell and C. L. Arteaga, “Modulation of NFκB activity and E-cadherin by the type III transforming growth factor β receptor regulates cell growth and motility,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 44, pp. 32491–32500, 2007.

Y.-W. Zhang, J. Shi, Y.-J. Li, and L. Wei, “Cardiomyocyte death in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity,” Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 435–445, 2009.

H. Wang, X. Chen, Y. Su et al., “p47(phox) contributes to albuminuria and kidney fibrosis in mice,” Kidney International, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 948–962, 2015.

H. Y. Lan, “Diverse roles of TGF-β/Smads in renal fibrosis and inflammation,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1056–1067, 2011.

X. M. Meng, X. R. Huang, A. C. K. Chung et al., “Smad2 protects against TGF-β/Smad3-mediated renal fibrosis,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1477–1487, 2010.

X.-M. Meng, X. R. Huang, J. Xiao et al., “Disruption of Smad4 impairs TGF-β/Smad3 and Smad7 transcriptional regulation during renal inflammation and fibrosis in vivo and in vitro,” Kidney International, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 266–279, 2012.

H. Y. Lan, W. Mu, N. Tomita et al., “Inhibition of renal fibrosis by gene transfer of inducible Smad7 using ultrasound-microbubble system in rat UUO model,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1535–1548, 2003.

D. Pohlers, J. Brenmoehl, I. Löffler et al., “TGF-β and fibrosis in different organs—molecular pathway imprints,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1792, no. 8, pp. 746–756, 2009.

R. Sallie, J. M. Tredger, and R. Williams, “Drugs and the liver. Part 1: testing liver function,” Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 251–259, 1991.

N. Khan and S. Sultana, “Abrogation of potassium bromate-induced renal oxidative stress and subsequent cell proliferation response by soy isoflavones in Wistar rats,” Toxicology, vol. 201, no. 1–3, pp. 173–184, 2004.

K. Van Beneden, C. Geers, M. Pauwels et al., “Comparison of trichostatin A and valproic acid treatment regimens in a mouse model of kidney fibrosis,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 271, no. 2, pp. 276–284, 2013.

Y. Liu, “Renal fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics,” Kidney International, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 213–217, 2006.

I. Montorfano, A. Becerra, R. Cerro et al., “Oxidative stress mediates the conversion of endothelial cells into myofibroblasts via a TGF-β1 and TGF-β2-dependent pathway,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 1068–1082, 2014.

R. Samarakoon, J. M. Overstreet, and P. J. Higgins, “TGF-β signaling in tissue fibrosis: redox controls, target genes and therapeutic opportunities,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 264–268, 2013.

H. Wu, Y. M. Wang, Y. Wang et al., “Depletion of γδ T cells exacerbates murine adriamycin nephropathy,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1180–1189, 2007.

J. Guo, R. Ananthakrishnan, W. Qu et al., “RAGE mediates podocyte injury in adriamycin-induced glomerulosclerosis,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 961–972, 2008.

N. A. El-Shitany, S. El-Haggar, and K. El-desoky, “Silymarin prevents adriamycin-induced cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity in rats,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2422–2428, 2008.

S. Rashid, N. Ali, S. Nafees et al., “Alleviation of doxorubicin-induced nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity by chrysin in Wistar rats,” Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 337–345, 2013.

J. Ø. Moskaug, H. Carlsen, M. C. W. Myhrstad, and R. Blomhoff, “Polyphenols and glutathione synthesis regulation,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 81, no. 1, supplement, pp. 277S–283S, 2005.

G. Wu, Y.-Z. Fang, S. Yang, J. R. Lupton, and N. D. Turner, “Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 489–492, 2004.

D. J. Reed and M. K. Savage, “Influence of metabolic inhibitors on mitochondrial permeability transition and glutathione status,” BBA - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1271, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 1995.