Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3619879, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3619879

Research Article

Tabetri™ (Tabebuia avellanedae Ethanol Extract) Ameliorates Osteoarthritis Symptoms Induced by Monoiodoacetate through Its Anti-Inflammatory and Chondroprotective Activities

Jae Gwang Park,¹ Young-Su Yi,² Yo Han Hong,¹ Sulgi Yoo,¹ Sang Yun Han,¹ Eunji Kim,¹ Seong-Gu Jeong,¹ Adithan Aravinthan,³ Kwang Soo Baik,⁴ Su Young Choi,⁴ Young-Jin Son,⁵ Jong-Hoon Kim,³ and Jae Youl Cho¹

¹Department of Genetic Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
²Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28503, Republic of Korea
³College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Iksan 54596, Republic of Korea
⁴R&I Planning Department, Nutribiotech Co. Ltd., Seoul 06132, Republic of Korea
⁵Department of Pharmacy, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Young-Jin Son; sony@sunchon.ac.kr, Jong-Hoon Kim; jhkim1@jbnu.ac.kr, and Jae Youl Cho; jaecho@skku.edu

Received 19 July 2017; Accepted 10 October 2017; Published 26 November 2017

Academic Editor: Vera L. Petricevich

Copyright © 2017 Jae Gwang Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Although osteoarthritis (OA), a degenerative joint disease characterized by the degradation of joint articular cartilage and subchondral bones, is generally regarded as a degenerative rather than inflammatory disease, recent studies have indicated the involvement of inflammation in OA pathogenesis. Tabebuia avellanedae has long been used to treat various diseases; however, its role in inflammatory response and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, the pharmacological effects of Tabetri (Tabebuia avellanedae ethanol extract (Ta-EE)) on OA pathogenesis induced by monoiodoacetate (MIA) and the underlying mechanisms were investigated using experiments with a rat model and in vitro cellular models. In the animal model, Ta-EE significantly ameliorated OA symptoms and reduced the serum levels of inflammatory mediators and proinflammatory cytokines without any toxicity. The anti-inflammatory activity of Ta-EE was further confirmed in a macrophage-like cell line (RAW264.7). Ta-EE dramatically suppressed the production and mRNA expressions of inflammatory mediators and proinflammatory cytokines in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 cells without any cytotoxicity. Finally, the chondroprotective effect of Ta-EE was examined in a chondrosarcoma cell line (SW1353). Ta-EE markedly suppressed the mRNA expression of matrix metalloproteinase genes. The anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective activities of Ta-EE were attributed to the targeting of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and activator protein-1 (AP-1) signaling pathways in macrophages and chondrocytes.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a time- and age-dependent progressive degenerative joint disease characterized by the degradation of joint cartilage and the underlying bones. OA is characterized by joint stiffness and pain caused by articular cartilage damage, the alteration of subchondral bones, formation of osteophytes, and thickening of synovial linings [1–4]. One of the major risk factors for OA is age. Most OA patients are over 45 years of age, and the highest morbidity attributed to OA is observed in patients over 60 years of age [5]. Among adults over 60 years of age, the prevalence of OA is approximately 10% in males and 13% in females [6]. Given the current worldwide demographic trend in which the older population is growing quickly, OA patients are expected to increase in the future. Despite this large number of OA patients, no disease-modifying drugs have been developed to effectively treat OA, and the available drugs only alleviate OA symptoms [7]. Therefore, joint replacement is the only treatment available to OA patients who reach the final stage of OA, highlighting the urgent need to develop effective anti-OA drugs. One of the unresolved issues in OA pathogenesis is the contribution of inflammatory response and oxidative stress to the onset and progression of OA. These two risk factors have been increasingly considered to be closely integrated during the pathogenesis of OA. A number of inflammatory mediators, including proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂), have been reported to be increased in the joint tissues of OA patients and OA-like animals [8–10]. Inflammatory responses along with other risk factors, such as aging and mechanical load, were reported to induce oxidative stress by production of nitric oxide (NO), reactive oxygen species (ROS), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), superoxide anion, and peroxynitrite and also to suppress the expression of the enzymes responsible for antioxidant and ROS scavenging activities [11]. Moreover, oxidative stress has been reported to cause abnormality in the metabolisms of cartilages and bones, exacerbating the degradation and overall reparative potential of osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and their precursor cells [11, 12]. Although OA has long been regarded as a degenerative rather than inflammatory joint disease, recent studies have reported correlations between OA pathogenesis and inflammatory responses as well as oxidative stress [10, 13–20].

Inflammation, which is a series of complex biological processes to prevent the body from various invading pathogens and environmental dangers, is characterized by redness, heat, swelling, pain, and loss of function [21–24]. Although an inflammatory response is a defense mechanism, chronic inflammation resulting from repeated and prolonged inflammatory response is thought to be a major risk factor for various inflammatory/autoimmune diseases [25, 26]. An inflammatory response is initiated when pattern recognition receptors recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns expressed on the inflammatory cells via the activation of inflammatory signaling pathways, including nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), activated protein-1 (AP-1), and interferon-regulatory factors. This leads to the production of proinflammatory cytokines and genes such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) along with inflammatory mediators such as PGE₂ and nitrites [27–30].

Tabebuia avellanedae Lorentz ex Griseb (Bignoniaceae) is a tree that belongs to the plant family Bignoniaceae of the genus Tabebuia. It is found in the tropical rain forests of South America, particularly in Brazil. The product produced from the inner, purple-colored bark of this tree is known as Taheebo or pau d’arco and has been used pharmacologically to treat various conditions including fungal infection, eczema, psoriasis, and skin cancer [31–33]. Various active pharmacological compounds such as naphthoquinones, furanonaphthoquinones, anthraquinones, β-lapachone, benzoic acid derivatives, benzaldehyde derivatives, cyclopentene derivatives, iridoids, coumarins, anthraquinone-2-carboxlic acid, and flavonoids have been extracted from Tabebuia avellanedae [34–43]. Recent studies found that some of these compounds exert anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and anticancer activity [36, 37, 41, 44–46]. However, few studies have explored the effects of Tabebuia avellanedae on inflammatory response and inflammatory diseases.

In this study, we prepared the ethanol extract of Tabebuia avellanedae (Ta-EE, Tabetri) and investigated (1) its in vivo pharmacological effects on the pathogenesis of OA using monoiodoacetate- (MIA-) induced OA rats as an experimental animal model and (2) its underlying molecular mechanisms using two in vitro models: a lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) challenged macrophage-like cell line (RAW264.7) and a phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate- (PMA-) challenged chondrosarcoma cell line (SW1353).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Ta-EE, Perna canaliculus (green lipped mussel) lipid extract (Pc-LE), and methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) were kindly provided from Nutribiotech Co. Ltd. (Seoul, South Korea). LPS (E. coli 0111:B4), PMA, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), monoiodoacetate (MIA), safranin O, toluidine blue, hematoxylin, and eosin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. Ltd. (St. Louis, MO, USA). RAW264.7 and SW1353 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), phosphate buffered saline (PBS), streptomycin, penicillin, and L-glutamine were purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for PGE₂, LTB₄, IL-1β, and IL-6 were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). TRI Reagent® was purchased from Molecular Research Center Inc. (Cincinnati, OH, USA). MuLV reverse transcriptase was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The primers used for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and semiquantitative PCR were synthesized, and the PCR premix for semiquantitative PCR was purchased from Bioneer Inc. (Daejeon, South Korea). pPCRBIO SyGreen Mix for quantitative real-time PCR was purchased from PCR Biosystems Ltd. (London, United Kingdom). Antibodies specific for the phosphorylated and total forms of p85, IKKα/β, IκBα, p50, p65, p38, JNK, ERK, c-Jun, c-Fos, Src, Syk, IRAK4, and β-actin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). An enhanced chemiluminescence system was purchased from AbFrontier (Seoul, South Korea).

2.2. Cell Culture

The macrophage-like cell line (RAW264.7) and chondrosarcoma cell line (SW1353) were cultured in RPMI 1640 media and DMEM, respectively, containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 2 mM L-glutamine at 37°C in a 5% CO₂-humidified incubator. Two times per week, the culture media were replaced, and the cells were subcultured.

2.3. Animals and Husbandry

Sprague-Dawley rats (male, five weeks old) were purchased from Daehan Biolink (Osong, South Korea). The rats (three rats/cage) were maintained in the plastic cages at room temperature with constant 12 h : 12 h light and dark cycles, and the rats were fed tap water and pelleted foods (Samyang, Daejeon, South Korea) ad libitum. All studies using these rats were conducted according to the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Sungkyunkwan University.

2.4. Induction and Monitoring of MIA-Induced OA in Rats

MIA-induced OA was induced in the Sprague-Dawley rats as described previously [47]. The rats were anesthetized using an exposure chamber with ether. The hair of the anesthetized rats was shaved and the skins were sanitized with 70% ethanol. The rats were injected with 3 mg of MIA in 50 μl sterile PBS into the knee joint cavity (intra-articularly). The needle was passed through the patellar tendons of the rats, and rats were then transferred to cages. After one week, the MIA-injected rats were randomly assigned to different treatment groups (three rats/cage) and orally administered with either three different doses of Ta-EE (30, 60, and 120 mg/kg), MSM (155 mg/kg), or Pc-LE (20 mg/kg) in 100 μl once a day for four weeks. The pharmacological effects of Ta-EE on OA symptoms were evaluated once a week for five weeks, and the study was ended at week five (Figure 1(a)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 1: Ta-EE ameliorated OA symptoms in MIA-induced OA rats. (a) Experimental schedule of OA induction, treatment, and evaluation. Sprague-Dawley rats (10 rats/group) were intra-articularly injected with MIA (3 mg/rat). One week later, the rats were subjected to different treatments once a day for four weeks. The study finished at week five. (b) MIA-induced OA rats were orally administered with either Ta-EE (30–120 mg/kg), MSM (155 mg/kg), or Pc-LE (20 mg/kg) once a day for four weeks, and paw withdrawal threshold was measured once a week for five weeks. The significance of each group with respect to the MIA group each week is summarized in the box. (c) Body weights of the rats were measured once a week for five weeks. ((d); left panel) MIA-induced OA rats were orally administered with Ta-EE (30–120 mg/kg), MSM (155 mg/kg), or Pc-LE (20 mg/kg) once a day for four weeks, and the tibia bones were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, safranin O, or toluidine blue at week five. The areas stained by ((d); middle panel) safranin O and ((d); right panel) toluidine blue were measured and plotted. (e) The femur and tibia bones of the MIA-induced OA rats administered with Ta-EE (30–120 mg/kg), MSM (155 mg/kg), or Pc-LE (20 mg/kg) were analyzed by X-ray radiography. and versus a control group; # and ## versus a normal group.

2.5. Measurement of Paw Withdrawal Threshold

Pain sensitivity was evaluated by measuring the withdrawal threshold of the paw in the direction that caused osteoarthritis in response to mechanical stimuli with von Frey hairs. Before evaluation, the animals were placed in a plastic cage with a wire-net floor and allowed to acclimate for 10 min. A series of eight calibrated von Frey hairs (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 26, and 60 g) were applied to the plantar surface of the hind paw. Each von Frey hair was held for 2 s with 3 min between measurements. The pain sensitivity was inversely proportional to the response to the intensity of von Frey hair.

2.6. Measurement of Body Weight

The body weights of all rats in each experimental group were measured once a week for five weeks using a scale (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA).

2.7. Hematoxylin and Eosin and Immunohistochemical Staining

The cartilage sample was fixed with 10% buffered formaldehyde solution and then embedded in paraffin. Sections of cartilage (thickness = 4 μm) were stained with hematoxylin-eosin to observe pathological changes, safranin O to observe cartilage, or toluidine blue to observe glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), as reported previously [48]. The animals were scanned by microcomputed tomography (Chonbuk University, Icksan, South Korea) to observe architectural changes in the femur and tibia bones four weeks after intraarticular injection.

2.8. X-Ray Radiography

The degradation of cartilage and subchondral bones was evaluated by X-ray radiography in one representative rat in each experimental group.

2.9. PGE₂ Production Assay

RAW264.7 cells (1 × 10⁶ cells/ml) pretreated with Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) for 30 min were treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 24 h. Rats intra-articularly injected with MIA (3 mg) were orally administered with either Ta-EE, MSM, or Pc-LE for four weeks. The production and release of PGE₂ in the cell culture medium and rat sera were determined by enzyme immunoassay as described previously [49].

2.10. ELISA

The secreted levels of LTB₄, IL-1β, and IL-6 in (1) the sera of rats intra-articularly injected with MIA (3 mg) and orally administered with either Ta-EE, MSM, or Pc-LE for four weeks and (2) the cell culture media of RAW264.7 cells pretreated with Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) for 30 min and treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 24 h were determined by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

2.11. Nitrite Production Assay

RAW264.7 cells (5 × 10⁶ cells/ml) pretreated with either Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) for 30 min were treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 24 h. Nitrite production was determined by measuring the nitrite level in the cell culture medium using Griess reagents as previously described [26].

2.12. Cell Viability Assay

The cytotoxic effects of Ta-EE on RAW264.7 cells (1 × 10⁶ cells/ml) and SW1353 cells (1 × 10⁶ cells/ml) were determined by treating the cells with escalating doses of Ta-EE (0, 75, 100, and 300 μg/ml) for 24 h, and cell viability was determined by MTT assay as reported previously [50, 51]. Briefly, the cell culture media were mixed with MTT solution (10 mg/ml in PBS, pH 7.4) and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. A 15% SDS solution was directly added to the mixture to stop the reaction followed by incubation at 37°C for 24 h. Optical density was then measured at 570 nm using a Spectramax 250 microplate reader.

2.13. Quantitative and Semiquantitative PCR

To determine the mRNA expression levels of IL-1β, iNOS, and COX-2, total RNA was extracted from RAW264.7 cells treated with Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) and LPS (1 μg/ml) for 6 h using TRI reagent® according to the manufacturer’s instructions and immediately stored at −70°C until use. Total cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using MuLV reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and quantitative real-time and semiquantitative PCR were conducted as described previously [26]. The nucleic acid sequences of the primers used for PCR are listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Nucleic acid sequences of the primers used for PCR.

Target
Sequence (5′ to 3′)

Semiquantitative real-time PCR

MMP1
Forward
CCCAGCGACTCTAGAAACACA

Reverse
CTGCTTGACCCTCAGAGACC

MMP2
Forward
ACGACCGCGACAAGAACTAT

Reverse
CTGCAAAGAACACAGCCTTCTC

MMP9
Forward
CAGTACCGAGAGAAAGCCTA

Reverse
ACTGCAGGATGTCATAGGTC

MMP13
Forward
GAAATGCAGTCTTTCTTCGG

Reverse
GCCTTTTCGACTTCAGAATG

GAPDH
Forward
CACTCACGGCAAATTCAACGGCAC

Reverse
GACTCCACGACATACTCAGCAC

Quantitative real-time PCR

IL-1β
Forward
TAGAGCTGCTGGCCTTGTTA

Reverse
ACCTGTAAAGGCTTCTCGGA

iNOS
Forward
GGAGCCTTTAGACCTCAACAGA

Reverse
TGAACGAGGAGGGTGGTG

COX-2
Forward
CACTACATCCTGACCCACTT

Reverse
ATGCTCCTGCTTGAGTATGT

COL2A1
Forward
GCAACGTGGTGAGAGAGGAT

Reverse
CCTGTCGTCCGGGTTCAC

CHSY1
Forward
ATTGTCATGCAGGTCATGGA

Reverse
CTCACAGGGACCGTCATTTT

GAPDH
Forward
CAATGAATACGGCTACAGCAAC

Reverse
AGGGAGATGCTCAGTGTTGG

2.14. Western Blot Analysis

For preparing total cell lysates, RAW264.7 and SW1353 cells (1 × 10⁶ cells/ml) were lysed with ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 50 mM glycerol phosphate, 1 mM DTT, 2 μg/ml aprotinin, 2 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 μg/ml pepatatin, 50 μM PMSF, 1 mM benzamide, 2% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM sodium vanadate, 1.6 mM pervanadate, and 20 mM NaF), and the total cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C and stored at −20°C until use.

For Western blot analysis, the total cell lysates were electrophoresed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and the total proteins in the gel were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane by electroblotting. The protein-transferred membrane was blocked using 5% BSA in PBS at room temperature for 1 h followed by incubation with the primary antibodies specific for each target for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation with primary antibodies, the membranes were washed three times (10 min each time) with 0.1% TBST (Tris-base, NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.6), incubated with HRP-linked secondary antibodies containing 3% BSA for 1 h at room temperature, and washed with 0.1% TBST (three times for 10 min each). The phosphorylated and total forms of p85, IKKα/β, IκBα, p50, p65, p38, JNK, ERK, c-Jun, c-Fos, Src, Syk, IRAK4, and β-actin were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.15. In Vitro Kinase Assay

The in vitro effects of Ta-EE on the activities of purified target kinases (Syk, Src, and IRAK4) were determined using the kinase profiler service of Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA) as reported previously [52]. Briefly, each kinase was incubated with reaction buffer containing MgATP for 40 min at room temperature and further incubated after adding 3% phosphoric acid solution to the reaction solution. Each incubate was dropped onto a P30 filtermat and washed three times with phosphoric acid (5 min each wash) and once with methanol for 5 min. After drying the incubates, the kinase activities were measured by scintillation counting.

2.16. Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as the mean and standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. For statistical significance, results were analyzed by analysis of variance/Scheffe’s post hoc test and Kruskal-Wallis/Mann–Whitney U test, and was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS.

3. Results and Discussion

Despite several studies reporting the anti-inflammatory activity of Tabebuia avellanedae [41–44, 46, 53, 54], its pharmacological effects on inflammatory diseases along with their underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. To address this gap in knowledge, we investigated the pharmacological effects of Ta-EE on the pathogenesis of OA using MIA rats as an animal model and examined the molecular mechanism of Ta-EE-mediated anti-inflammatory activity using in vitro cell line models.

The experimental design used to explore the in vivo pharmacological effects of Ta-EE on OA pathogenesis using experimental OA rats is shown in Figure 1(a) and detailed in Sections 2.4 and 2.5. The mechanical paw withdrawal threshold to von Frey stimuli as a pain indicator was significantly increased in the OA rats administered with Ta-EE compared to the untreated OA rats (Figure 1(b)). Ta-EE exerted a comparable effect with MSM and Pc-LE (positive controls; Figure 1(b)), suggesting that Ta-EE could compete with the anti-inflammatory therapeutic compounds currently used as anti-inflammatory agents. Interestingly, the effect of Ta-EE on paw withdrawal threshold was not dose dependent, indicating that the pharmacological benefit of Ta-EE can be achieved with small doses, which could decrease toxicity and production cost. The rats in all groups tolerated the treatments well and did not show any decrease in body weight during treatment with Ta-EE and the two positive controls (Figure 1(c)), indicating that Ta-EE does not exhibit in vivo toxicity or cause side effects at the doses studied herein.

The pharmacological effect of Ta-EE on OA pathogenesis was investigated by histopathological analyses. The degradation of articular cartilage was dramatically inhibited in the rats administered with Ta-EE and the two positive controls, while the articular cartilage of OA rats was severely degraded (Figure 1(d); left panel). Interestingly, the chondroprotective effect by Ta-EE was better than MSM at the doses of 60 and 120 mg/kg (Figure 1(d); middle and right panels). Hematoxylin and eosin staining supported these observations; the damage to cartilage and subchondral bone was markedly reduced in the OA rats administered with Ta-EE and the positive controls, whereas tissue damage was severe in untreated OA rats (Figure 1(d); left panel). The cartilage areas stained by safranin O (Figure 1(d); middle panel) and toluidine blue (Figure 1(d); right panel) were measured and plotted. Unlike the paw withdrawal threshold results, Ta-EE inhibited cartilage degradation in a dose-dependent manner. The reason for this difference is unclear and requires further investigation; however, it might be attributed to the different pathophysiological mechanisms that induce paw pain and articular cartilage degradation. The degradation of articular cartilage and subchondral bones was further evaluated in the OA rats administered with Ta-EE by an X-ray radiography, and the results confirmed the findings of the histopathological analyses; Ta-EE and the two positive controls effectively inhibited the degradation of articular cartilage and subchondral bones, while these tissues were severely degraded in untreated OA rats (Figure 1(e)). In accordance with the histopathological analyses (Figure 1(d)), Ta-EE showed better protective effect on the degradation of articular cartilage and subchondral bones at the doses of 60 and 120 mg/kg than MSM (Figure 1(e)). These in vivo results strongly suggest that Ta-EE significantly ameliorates the symptoms of OA and exhibits effective chondro- and osteoprotective activity in OA pathogenesis.

As mentioned earlier, several recent studies have reported a functional correlation between inflammation and OA pathogenesis [8–16]. Therefore, we examined the in vivo effects of Ta-EE on the production of inflammatory mediators and proinflammatory cytokines in the sera of OA rats. The serum levels of PGE₂ (Figure 2(a)), LTB₄ (Figure 2(b)), and IL-1β (Figure 2(c)) were significantly lower in the OA rats administered with Ta-EE compared to untreated OA rats at both two and four weeks () after administration. In contrast, the serum level of IL-6 was significantly lower in the OA rats administered with Ta-EE compared to untreated OA rats at only four weeks after administration (, Figure 2(d)). Although IL-1β and IL-6 are both proinflammatory cytokines, the effects of Ta-EE on the IL-1β and IL-6 levels in the sera of OA rats differed, and the reason for this difference is unclear. However, similar patterns were observed in the sera of mice in which an inflammatory gene had been deleted (Yi et al., unpublished data), demonstrating that the production and metabolism of different proinflammatory cytokines can be differentially regulated by anti-inflammatory agents. Anti-inflammatory effect of Ta-EE on the production of these molecules was further compared with two positive controls. Ta-EE exerted better suppressive effect than MSM for the production of PGE₂ and IL-1β on week two at both 60 and 120 mg/kg doses and on week four at a 120 mg/kg dose (Figures 2(a) and 2(c)), whereas the effect of Ta-EE was similar with that of MSM for the production of LTB₄ and IL-6 (Figures 2(b) and 2(d)). In contrast, its suppressive effect on the production of these molecules was comparable to that of Pc-LE on all weeks at both doses (Figures 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), and 2(d)). These results suggest that Ta-EE has a better anti-inflammatory activity than MSM which is currently using as an anti-inflammatory agent and that Ta-EE might be a promising anti-inflammatory remedy for various inflammatory diseases.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2: Ta-EE reduced the serum levels of inflammatory mediators and proinflammatory cytokines in MIA-induced OA rats. MIA-induced OA rats were orally administered with either Ta-EE (30–120 mg/kg), MSM (155 mg/kg), or Pc-LE (20 mg/kg) once a day, and the levels of (a) PGE₂, (b) LTB₄, (c) IL-1β, and (d) IL-6 in the sera of the rats in each group were measured at weeks zero, two, and four. , versus a control group; # and ## versus a normal group; and week 0 versus week 2 or 4; and week 2 versus week 4.

Since Ta-EE ameliorated the symptoms of OA in an OA animal model and exerted in vivo anti-inflammatory activity by decreasing the serum levels of inflammatory mediators and proinflammatory cytokines, we further examined the in vitro anti-inflammatory activity of Ta-EE using an in vitro cell model, LPS-challenged macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells. Given the possibility of false anti-inflammatory activity caused by Ta-EE-mediated cytotoxicity, Ta-EE-mediated cytotoxicity was first examined in RAW264.7 cells. Ta-EE did not exert any cytotoxicity at the examined doses (0–300 μg/ml; Figure 3(a)). The production of inflammatory mediators (nitrite, PGE₂, and LTB₄) along with proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-6) was significantly suppressed by Ta-EE in the LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figures 3(b), 3(c), 3(d), and 3(f)). Moreover, the mRNA expression levels of IL-1β and inflammatory genes (iNOS and COX-2) were markedly decreased by Ta-EE in the LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figures 3(g), 3(h), and 3(i)). These in vitro results suggest that Ta-EE exerts anti-inflammatory activity by suppressing both the production and mRNA expressions of inflammatory mediators and proinflammatory cytokines in the inflammatory macrophages.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

Figure 3: Ta-EE suppressed the production and mRNA expressions of inflammatory mediators and proinflammatory cytokines in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. (a) RAW264.7 cells were treated with Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) for 24 h, and cell viability was measured by MTT assay. (b) RAW264.7 cells pretreated with Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) for 30 min were treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 24 h, and nitrite production levels in the cell culture media were measured using Griess reagents. RAW264.7 cells pretreated with Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) for 30 min were treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 24 h, and the production levels of (c) PGE₂, (d) LTB₄, (e) IL-1β, and (f) IL-6 in the cell culture media were measured by ELISA. RAW264.7 cells pretreated with Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) for 30 min were treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for 6 h, and the mRNA expression levels of (g) IL-1β, (h) IL-6, and (i) COX-2 in the cells were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. and versus a control group; # and ## versus a normal group.

Next, we investigated the molecular mechanism by which Ta-EE suppressed inflammatory responses in macrophages. The effects of Ta-EE on the two main inflammatory signaling pathways, the NF-κB and AP-1 signaling pathways, were examined in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells using Western blot analysis. Ta-EE significantly suppressed the activation of the following intracellular signaling molecules in the NF-κB signaling pathway by inhibiting their phosphorylation levels (Figure 4(a)): p85 (15–60 min during LPS treatment), IKKα/β (15–60 min), IκBα (5 min), p50 (30–60 min), and p65 (30–60 min). Ta-EE also suppressed the activation of intracellular signaling molecules in the AP-1 signaling pathway: p38 (5 min), JNK (15 min), ERK (15–60 min), c-Jun (30 min), and c-Fos (60 min). However, the suppressive effect of Ta-EE on the AP-1 signaling pathway was much weaker than on the NF-κB signaling pathway (Figure 4(b)). Therefore, the effects of Ta-EE on the activation of upstream signaling molecules in the NF-κB signaling pathway (Src, Syk, and IRAK1) were further examined in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. As expected, Ta-EE suppressed the activation of Src, Syk, and IRAK1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of Src (2 min) and Syk (3–5 min) and the degradation of IRAK1 (2 min; Figure 4(c)). To identify the direct molecular targets of Ta-EE during its anti-inflammatory activity, the kinase activities of both Src and Syk (the phosphorylation of which was both suppressed by Ta-EE) were determined by an in vitro kinase assay. Interestingly, Ta-EE significantly suppressed the kinase activities of both Src and Syk (Figure 4(d)), while it did not directly suppress the kinase activity of IRAK1. This indicates that the direct molecular targets of Ta-EE are Src and Syk in the NF-κB signaling pathway. The above findings suggest that Ta-EE exerts anti-inflammatory activity by suppressing the NF-κB signaling pathway via the direct targeting of upstream kinases (Src and Syk) during inflammatory responses in macrophages.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4: Ta-EE suppressed the activation of the NF-κB and AP-1 signaling pathways in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. RAW264.7 cells pretreated with Ta-EE (300 μg/ml) for 30 min were treated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for the indicated time, and the total and phosphorylated protein levels of (a) p85, IKKα/β, IκBα, p50, and p65; (b) p38, JNK, ERK, c-Jun, and c-Fos; and (c) Src, Syk, and IRAK1 in the total cell lysates were determined by Western blot analysis. β-Actin was used as an internal control. (d) Effects of Ta-EE on the kinase activities of Src, Syk, and IRAK1 were determined by in vitro kinase assay using purified Src, Syk, and IRAK1 as described in Materials and Methods. and versus a control group.

The primary cells and tissues damaged during OA pathogenesis are chondrocytes and articular cartilage because chondrocytes are located in the superficial areas of articular cartilage. Therefore, we investigated the effect of Ta-EE on chondrocytes using chondrosarcoma cells (SW1353 cell line). Ta-EE did not exhibit any cytotoxicity towards SW1535 cells at doses ranging from 0 to 300 μg/ml (Figure 5(a)). Extracellular matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), zinc-dependent endopeptidases, have multiple biological roles in macromolecular protein turnover and tissue remodeling [55]. Most MMPs are produced in the chondrocytes and are responsible for the degradation of various pericellular and interterritorial proteins in the extracellular matrix of articular cartilage. The expressions of MMP genes have been reported to be upregulated in OA sera and synovial fluids, leading to the degradation and remodeling of proteins in the cartilage extracellular matrix [56, 57]. Therefore, the effects of Ta-EE on the expressions of MMP genes were examined in SW1353 cells by semi-quantitative PCR. We selected MMP1, MMP2, MMP9, and MMP13 as primary targets because these MMPs are collagenases and gelatinases that degrade collagens and gelatins, which are abundant in the extracellular matrix of articular cartilage. Ta-EE dramatically downregulated the gene expressions of MMP2, MMP9, and MMP13 but not that of MMP1 in PMA-stimulated SW1353 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 5(b)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 5: Ta-EE exerted a chondroprotective effect by downregulating MMP gene expression rather than upregulating the gene expressions of COL2A1 and CHSY1 in SW1353 cells. (a) SW1353 cells were treated with Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) for 24 h, and cell viability was measured by MTT assay. (b) SW1353 cells pretreated with Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) for 30 min were treated with PMA (100 nM) for 6 h, and the mRNA expression levels of MMP1, MMP2, MMP9, and MMP13 in the cells were measured by semiquantitative PCR. SW1353 cells pretreated with Ta-EE (300 μg/ml) for 30 min were treated with PMA (100 nM) for the indicated time, and the total and phosphorylated protein levels of (c) IKKα/β and IκBα and (d) ERK, JNK, and p38 in the total cell lysates were determined by Western blotting. β-Actin was used as an internal control. (e) SW1353 cells were treated with Ta-EE (0–300 μg/ml) for 6 h, and the mRNA expression levels of COL2A1 and CHSY1 in the cells were measured by quantitative real-time PCR.

We also examined the molecular mechanism by which Ta-EE downregulated the expressions of the above MMP genes in PMA-stimulated SW1353 cells. Similar to those in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), the effects of Ta-EE on the activation of intracellular signaling molecules in the NF-κB and AP-1 signaling pathways were examined by Western blot analysis. Ta-EE markedly suppressed the activation of IKKα/β (2-3 h) and IκBα (2-3 h) in the NF-κB signaling pathway by inhibiting their phosphorylation (Figure 5(c)). Ta-EE also suppressed the activation of ERK (1–3 h), JNK (1–3 h), and p38 (1-2 h) in the AP-1 signaling pathway by inhibiting their phosphorylation (Figure 5(d)). These results indicate that Ta-EE downregulated the expressions of MMP genes by suppressing both the NF-κB and AP-1 signaling pathways in the chondrocytes of PMA-stimulated SW1353 cells.

Next, we investigated the effects of Ta-EE on the expressions of genes known to produce extracellular matrix in articular cartilage. The expressions of collagen type II alpha I (COL2A1) and chondroitin sulfate synthase 1 (CHSY1) were examined by quantitative real-time PCR in Ta-EE-treated SW1353 cells. Unexpectedly, Ta-EE did not affect the gene expression of COL2A1 (Figure 5(e)) or CHSY1 (Figure 5(f)), suggesting that the chondroprotective function of Ta-EE is exerted by preventing cartilage degradation rather than by facilitating cartilage generation.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we investigated the in vivo pharmacological effects of Ta-EE on OA pathogenesis using an experimental OA animal model and the underlying molecular mechanisms of these effects using in vitro macrophage and chondrocyte cellular models. Ta-EE effectively ameliorated the symptoms of OA and delayed the onset and progression of OA without any toxicity or side effects in MIA-induced OA rats. These pharmacological effects were attributed to the anti-inflammatory activity of Ta-EE, which was exerted through the inhibition of the two most critical signaling pathways in inflammatory response: the NF-κB and AP-1 signaling pathways in macrophages. Specifically, Ta-EE directly targeted Src and Syk in the NF-κB signaling pathway. In addition, Ta-EE exerted chondroprotective activity by downregulating the gene expressions of various MMPs via the suppression of both the NF-κB and AP-1 signaling pathways rather than by upregulating the expressions of extracellular matrix-generating genes in chondrocytes. The findings of this study are summarized in Figure 6. The results provide evidence to support the correlation between OA pathogenesis and inflammatory response and demonstrate the anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective activities of Ta-EE in OA pathogenesis. Therefore, the findings of this study improve our understanding of the relationship between OA pathogenesis and inflammation and provide new insights to develop drugs to prevent and treat human inflammatory diseases, including OA.

Figure 6: Proposed model showing the inhibitory pathways associated Ta-EE-mediated anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective activities in OA pathogenesis.

Abbreviations

OA: | Osteoarthritis
Ta-EE: | Tabebuia avellanedae ethanol extract
MIA: | Monoiodoacetate
NO: | Nitric oxide
ROS: | Reactive oxygen species
H₂O2: | Hydrogen peroxide
NF-κB: | Nuclear factor-kappa B
AP-1: | Activator protein-1
IL: | Interleukin
iNOS: | Inducible nitric oxide synthase
COX-2: | Cyclooxygenase-2
PGE2: | Prostaglandin E₂
PMA: | Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
Pc-LE: | Perna canaliculus lipid extract
MTT: | 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
SDS: | Sodium dodecyl sulfate
ELISA: | Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
PCR: | Polymerase chain reaction
GAG: | Glycosaminoglycan
IKKα/β: | IκB kinase alpha/beta
IκBα: | NF-κB inhibitor alpha
JNK: | c-Jun N-terminal kinase
ERK: | Extracellular signal-regulated kinase
IRAK: | Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase
MMP: | Matrix metalloproteinase
COL2A1: | Collagen type II alpha 1
CHSY1: | Chondroitin sulfate synthase 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Jae Gwang Park and Young-Su Yi contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the World Class 300 Project R&D grant (Grant no. S2435140) funded by the Korea Small and Medium Business Administration (SMBA) in 2016.

References

S. Glyn-Jones, A. J. Palmer, R. Agricola et al., “Osteoarthritis,” The Lancet, vol. 386, no. 9991, pp. 376–387, 2015.

Y. Wang, A. J. Teichtahl, and F. M. Cicuttini, “Osteoarthritis year in review 2015: imaging,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2016.

J. Abusarah, H. Benabdoune, Q. Shi et al., “Elucidating the role of protandim and 6-gingerol in protection against osteoarthritis,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 1003–1013, 2017.

S. R. Goldring and M. B. Goldring, “Clinical aspects, pathology and pathophysiology of osteoarthritis,” Journal of Musculoskeletal & Neuronal Interactions, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 376–378, 2006.

A. Shane Anderson and R. F. Loeser, “Why is osteoarthritis an age-related disease?” Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2010.

Y. Zhang and J. M. Jordan, “Epidemiology of osteoarthritis,” Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 355–369, 2010.

M. McHughes and A. G. Lipman, “Managing osteoarthritis pain when your patient fails simple analgesics and NSAIDs and is not a candidate for surgery,” Current Rheumatology Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2006.

B. Poulet and K. A. Staines, “New developments in osteoarthritis and cartilage biology,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 28, pp. 8–13, 2016.

U. Ahmed, P. J. Thornalley, and N. Rabbani, “Possible role of methylglyoxal and glyoxalase in arthritis,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 538–542, 2014.

P. Kong, G. Chen, A. Jiang et al., “Sesamin inhibits IL-1β-stimulated inflammatory response in human osteoarthritis chondrocytes by activating Nrf2 signaling pathway,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 50, pp. 83720–83726, 2016.

C. Gavriilidis, S. Miwa, T. von Zglinicki, R. W. Taylor, and D. A. Young, “Mitochondrial dysfunction in osteoarthritis is associated with down-regulation of superoxide dismutase 2,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 378–387, 2013.

F. J. Blanco, M. J. Lopez-Armada, and E. Maneiro, “Mitochondrial dysfunction in osteoarthritis,” Mitochondrion, vol. 4, no. 5-6, pp. 715–728, 2004.

A. S. Marchev, P. A. Dimitrova, A. J. Burns, R. V. Kostov, A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, and M. I. Georgiev, “Oxidative stress and chronic inflammation in osteoarthritis: can NRF2 counteract these partners in crime?” Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1401, no. 1, pp. 114–135, 2017.

J. Sellam and F. Berenbaum, “The role of synovitis in pathophysiology and clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 625–635, 2010.

X. Ayral, E. H. Pickering, T. G. Woodworth, N. Mackillop, and M. Dougados, “Synovitis: a potential predictive factor of structural progression of medial tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis – results of a 1 year longitudinal arthroscopic study in 422 patients,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 361–367, 2005.

M. D. Rushton, L. N. Reynard, M. J. Barter et al., “Characterization of the cartilage DNA methylome in knee and hip osteoarthritis,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 2450–2460, 2014.

W. den Hollander, Y. F. Ramos, N. Bomer et al., “Transcriptional associations of osteoarthritis-mediated loss of epigenetic control in articular cartilage,” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 2108–2116, 2015.

A. Haseeb, M. S. Makki, and T. M. Haqqi, “Modulation of ten-eleven translocation 1 (TET1), Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) expression, α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), and DNA hydroxymethylation levels by interleukin-1β in primary human chondrocytes,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 10, pp. 6877–6885, 2014.

D. Merz, R. Liu, K. Johnson, and R. Terkeltaub, “IL-8/CXCL8 and growth-related oncogene alpha/CXCL1 induce chondrocyte hypertrophic differentiation,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 171, no. 8, pp. 4406–4415, 2003.

K. Chauffier, M. C. Laiguillon, C. Bougault et al., “Induction of the chemokine IL-8/kc by the articular cartilage: possible influence on osteoarthritis,” Joint, Bone, Spine, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 604–609, 2012.

C. A. Janeway and R. Medzhitov Jr., “Innate immune recognition,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 20, pp. 197–216, 2002.

Y. S. Yi, “Folate receptor-targeted diagnostics and therapeutics for inflammatory diseases,” Immune Network, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 337–343, 2016.

H. Kayama, J. Nishimura, and K. Takeda, “Regulation of intestinal homeostasis by innate immune cells,” Immune Network, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 227–234, 2013.

Y. S. Yi, “Caspase-11 non-canonical inflammasome: a critical sensor of intracellular lipopolysaccharide in macrophage-mediated inflammatory responses,” Immunology, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 207–217, 2017.

M. Kaur, M. Singh, and O. Silakari, “Inhibitors of switch kinase ‘spleen tyrosine kinase’ in inflammation and immune-mediated disorders: a review,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 67, pp. 434–446, 2013.

K. S. Baek, Y. S. Yi, Y. J. Son et al., “In vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activities of Korean red ginseng-derived components,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 437–444, 2016.

Y. S. Yi, Y. J. Son, C. Ryou, G. H. Sung, J. H. Kim, and J. Y. Cho, “Functional roles of Syk in macrophage-mediated inflammatory responses,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2014, Article ID 270302, 12 pages, 2014.

S. E. Byeon, Y. S. Yi, J. Oh, B. C. Yoo, S. Hong, and J. Y. Cho, “The role of Src kinase in macrophage-mediated inflammatory responses,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2012, Article ID 512926, 18 pages, 2012.

Y. Yang, S. C. Kim, T. Yu et al., “Functional roles of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in macrophage-mediated inflammatory responses,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2014, Article ID 352371, 13 pages, 2014.

Y. Yang, J. Lee, M. H. Rhee et al., “Molecular mechanism of protopanaxadiol saponin fraction-mediated anti-inflammatory actions,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2015.

C. G. Casinovi, G. B. Marini Bettolo, D. A. Limaog, M. E. Daliamaia, and I. L. D’ Albuquerque, “On quinones isolated from the wood of Tabebuia Avellanedae Lor. Ex Griseb,” Rendiconti - Istituto Superiore di Sanità, vol. 26, pp. 5–10, 1963.

C. F. de Santana, O. de Lima, I. L. D’ Albuquerque, A. L. Lacerda, and D. G. Martins, “Antitumoral and toxicological properties of extracts of bark and various wood components of Pau d’arco (Tabebuia avellanedae),” Revista Do Instituto De Antibioticos, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 89–94, 1968.

H. J. Woo and Y. H. Choi, “Growth inhibition of A549 human lung carcinoma cells by beta-lapachone through induction of apoptosis and inhibition of telomerase activity,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1017–1023, 2005.

B. Kreher, H. Lotter, G. A. Cordell, and H. Wagner, “New furanonaphthoquinones and other constituents of Tabebuia avellanedae and their immunomodulating activities in vitro,” Planta Medica, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 562-563, 1988.

S. Ueda, T. Umemura, K. Dohguchi et al., “Production of anti-tumour-promoting furanonaphthoquinones in Tabebuia avellanedae cell cultures,” Phytochemistry, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 323–325, 1994.

B. T. Choi, J. Cheong, and Y. H. Choi, “β-Lapachone-induced apoptosis is associated with activation of caspase-3 and inactivation of NF-ĸB in human colon cancer HCT-116 cells,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 845–850, 2003.

T. B. Machado, A. V. Pinto, M. C. Pinto et al., “In vitro activity of Brazilian medicinal plants, naturally occurring naphthoquinones and their analogues, against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 279–284, 2003.

E. M. Pereira, B. Machado Tde, I. C. Leal et al., “Tabebuia avellanedae naphthoquinones: activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococcal strains, cytotoxic activity and in vivo dermal irritability analysis,” Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, vol. 5, p. 5, 2006.

S. O. Kim, J. I. Kwon, Y. K. Jeong, G. Y. Kim, N. D. Kim, and Y. H. Choi, “Induction of Egr-1 is associated with anti-metastatic and anti-invasive ability of β-lapachone in human hepatocarcinoma cells,” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 2169–2176, 2007.

H. N. Kung, C. L. Chien, G. Y. Chau, M. J. Don, K. S. Lu, and Y. P. Chau, “Involvement of NO/cGMP signaling in the apoptotic and anti-angiogenic effects of β-lapachone on endothelial cells in vitro,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 211, no. 2, pp. 522–532, 2007.

J. Xu, G. Wagoner, J. C. Douglas, and P. D. Drew, “β-Lapachone ameliorization of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 254, no. 1-2, pp. 46–54, 2013.

L. Zhang, I. Hasegawa, and T. Ohta, “Anti-inflammatory cyclopentene derivatives from the inner bark of Tabebuia avellanedae,” Fitoterapia, vol. 109, pp. 217–223, 2016.

J. G. Park, Y. J. Son, M. Y. Kim, and J. Y. Cho, “Syk and IRAK1 contribute to immunopharmacological activities of anthraquinone-2-carboxlic acid,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 6, 2016.

S. Awale, T. Kawakami, Y. Tezuka, J. Y. Ueda, K. Tanaka, and S. Kadota, “Nitric oxide (NO) production inhibitory constituents of Tabebuia avellanedae from Brazil,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 710–713, 2005.

T. Bohler, J. Nolting, P. Gurragchaa et al., “Tabebuia avellanedae extracts inhibit IL-2-independent T-lymphocyte activation and proliferation,” Transplant Immunology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 319–323, 2008.

E. J. Lee, H. M. Ko, Y. H. Jeong, E. M. Park, and H. S. Kim, “β-Lapachone suppresses neuroinflammation by modulating the expression of cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases in activated microglia,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 133, 2015.

P. Liu, A. Okun, J. Ren et al., “Ongoing pain in the MIA model of osteoarthritis,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 493, no. 3, pp. 72–75, 2011.

N. Schmitz, S. Laverty, V. B. Kraus, and T. Aigner, “Basic methods in histopathology of joint tissues,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 18, Supplement 3, pp. S113–S116, 2010.

J. Y. Cho, K. U. Baik, J. H. Jung, and M. H. Park, “In vitro anti-inflammatory effects of cynaropicrin, a sesquiterpene lactone, from Saussurea lappa,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 398, no. 3, pp. 399–407, 2000.

J. G. Park, Y. J. Son, A. Aravinthan, J. H. Kim, and J. Y. Cho, “Korean red ginseng water extract arrests growth of xenografted lymphoma cells,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 431–436, 2016.

J. G. Park, W. S. Kang, K. T. Park et al., “Anticancer effect of joboksansam, Korean wild ginseng germinated from bird feces,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 304–308, 2016.

Y. S. Yi, M. Y. Kim, and J. Y. Cho, “JS-III-49, a hydroquinone derivative, exerts anti-inflammatory activity by targeting Akt and p38,” The Korean Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 345–352, 2017.

S. E. Byeon, J. Y. Chung, Y. G. Lee, B. H. Kim, K. H. Kim, and J. Y. Cho, “In vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory effects of taheebo, a water extract from the inner bark of Tabebuia avellanedae,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 145–152, 2008.

M. H. Lee, H. M. Choi, D. H. Hahm et al., “Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects in animal models of an ethanolic extract of Taheebo, the inner bark of Tabebuia avellanedae,” Moleculat Medicine Reports, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 791–796, 2012.

S. Chubinskaya, K. Huch, K. Mikecz et al., “Chondrocyte matrix metalloproteinase-8: up-regulation of neutrophil collagenase by interleukin-1 beta in human cartilage from knee and ankle joints,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 232–240, 1996.

C. J. Malemud, “Matrix metalloproteinases and synovial joint pathology,” Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, vol. 148, pp. 305–325, 2017.

S. Ahmed, J. Anuntiyo, C. J. Malemud, and T. M. Haqqi, “Biological basis for the use of botanicals in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a review,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 301–308, 2005.