Security and Privacy Issues in Vehicular Named Data Networks : An Overview

A tremendous amount of content and information are exchanging in a vehicular environment between vehicles, roadside units, and the Internet. +is information aims to improve the driving experience and human safety. Due to the VANET’s properties and application characteristics, the security becomes an essential aspect and a more challenging task. On the contrary, named data networking has been proposed as a future Internet architecture that may improve the network performance, enhance content access and dissemination, and decrease the communication delay. NDN uses a clean design based on content names and InterestData exchange model. In this paper, we focus on the vehicular named data networking environment, targeting the security attacks and privacy issues. We present a state of the art of existing VANETattacks and how NDN can deal with them. We classified these attacks based on the NDN perspective. Furthermore, we define various challenges and issues faced by NDN-based VANET and highlight future research directions that should be addressed by the research community.


Introduction
During the past two decades, research academies and industrials focused their attention on vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) [1] in order to provide safety and assistance applications, improve the driving experience, and control the road traffic.Towards this goal, several protocols are proposed such as dedicated short-range communication (DSRC), wireless access in vehicular environment (WAVE), and other protocols that run as an overlay on DSRC/WAVE rather than the IP protocol [2].In a vehicular environment, a huge amount of data are exchanged under different types of communication such as vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicleto-infrastructure (V2I), and with pedestrian, satellite, charging stations, and smart grids (V2U).V2I communication can be used in applications that support Internet access, while V2V is mostly used in real applications that need to send emergency and real-time information about an accident or traffic information [3].
However, exchanging information and sharing data in VANETunder the use of IP protocol have been a challenging task [4] due to the nature of this network that frequently and quickly changes under the use of poor-quality wireless link which makes VANET more complex in terms of routing, mobility, and security.Also, due to the fact that vehicles may exchange personal and sensitive information, securing the content and communication and preserving user and data privacy are indispensable [5].VANET communication must ensure different security requirements including privacy, confidentiality, integrity, and nonrepudiation.
Meanwhile, different solutions have been proposed in the literature as future Internet architectures [6].Information-centric networking (ICN) [7] has been proposed as one of the promising paradigms to replace the current host-centric network.Hereby, many solutions under the name of ICN have been implemented, such as named data networking (NDN) [8].NDN replaces the IP address with the name of the content and implements a simple content discovery and data delivery mechanism using an Interest-Data exchange model.NDN aims to improve that data dissemination and facilitates content access.Also, it may enhance mobility support and intermittent connectivity challenge that are difficult to provide through traditional IP networks, by merely re-requesting any unsatisfied request during the mobility and enabling vehicles to retrieve content from the most convenient cache store.Additionally, NDN follows a content-based security concept by protecting the content at the packet level instead of the communication channel level.
Security and privacy are one of the most critical aspects of the whole Internet and not only VANET.Bringing NDN in the vehicular environment has already been introduced in the literature [9].However, most of the existing works focus on the NDN forwarding plane [10,11] where the security solutions are rarely elaborated.

Motivation and Main Contributions.
Despite the existing efforts on security, most of them did not consider the nature of VANET communication and attacks in their study [12]; they generally focused on denial of service (DoS) ignoring other attacks.us, the main motivation behind this work is to discuss and uncover VANET attacks and security issues from the NDN perspective.Also, as ICN/NDN and VANET merging is still on its first stage and taking a shape, it is quite important to focus on the security and privacy concerns in this phase.It is worth noting that we take VANET as the main network environment, studying its security issues using NDN as a communication model, and not the inverse.To our best knowledge, our work is the first one focusing on VANET security using NDN as a communication plane.us, we classify all existing VANETattacks and issues based on the NDN point of view.We overview each one of them and map it to NDN communication.Also, we provide research directions aiming to overcome these attacks and helping the research community to investigate more in this context.

Organization of the Paper.
e rest of the paper is organized as follows: in the following section, we discuss the transaction from current host-centric vehicular networks toward the information-centric paradigm and overview the VANET and NDN architecture, focusing on security issues.en, in Section 3, we categorize each VANET attack from the NDN perspective and present the existing efforts and summary for each category.Later, we highlight various future research directions in Section 4 and conclude our paper in Section 5.

From Host-Centric to Information-Centric Vehicular Networks
ICN is a new communication paradigm that aims to replace the current host-centric model.Shifting from the current IPbased solutions to ICN is not an easy task.Table 1 provides a comparison of host-centric and information-centric paradigms.Regardless of the deployment and transaction methods, mapping ICN communication logic to the existing Internet applications and networks needs more investigation.In this section, we present a quick overview of both VANET and NDN and discuss the mapping between them and the advantages that can be ported by NDN to the vehicular environment.Also, as this work focuses on security, we discuss also some of the security issues related to NDN design.
2.1.Vehicular Ad Hoc Network Overview.Vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) [13] is a part of mobile ad hoc network (MANET) where the node could be a vehicle or roadside unit (RSU) [14].Vehicles exchange data with other vehicles (V2V), with RSU (V2I), or with charging stations, personal communication devices, and smart grids (vehicle to uniform) using different VANET applications.Each type of application has its particular features regarding content properties and the way the VANET applications consume it.ese characteristics make VANET a challenging environment in terms of security and privacy.

VANET Security and Privacy Problems.
As in any communication domain, security requirements in VANET should guarantee authentication, nonrepudiation, integrity, data availability, and confidentiality [15] in order to protect the exchanged messages in the network from modification, deletion, and delay by attackers.e vehicular communication characteristics and application properties have major effects on the security and privacy and make a more challenging environment.
e security challenges caused by VANET characteristics are the following: (1) Scalability.VANET is considered as an unbounded network that can be scalable from a small town to a big city until country [16].Every NDN node maintains three data structures: content store (CS), pending interest table (PIT), and forwarding information base (FIB).e CS maintains the locally cached data that can be served for future requests, while the PIT is used to track the received Interest packets, aggregate them, and forward the Data packet downstream.It maintains content name, list of incoming interfaces, and nonce tuple.Similar Interests for the same requests are aggregated within the same PIT entry by pending only the received interface, whereas the FIB table acts as the routing database that contains a list of reachable prefix-names with the outgoing interfaces.

NDN Working Principle.
Interest packets are triggered by consumers to discover the content in the network that can be satisfied by either a replica node or the original content producer, where a Data packet is used to deliver the content.us, the NDN working principle can be divided into two phases: Interest forwarding and Data forwarding, as illustrated on the right side in Figure 1: (1) Interest Forwarding.When an NDN node receives an Interest packet, it checks its CS whether it already has the requested content.If the content exists on the CS, a Data packet is sent back using the same interface from where the Interest has arrived.Otherwise, PIT exact match is done.When a match is found, it means the same request has already been treated, and the interface name from where the Interest has been received will be appended to the PITentry; otherwise, a new PIT entry is created for that request by recording the content name and the incoming interface and then performing the FIB longest prefix-name lookup: if a match is found, the Interest will be forwarded to the appropriate interface; otherwise, based on the network policies, the Interest will be either dropped or broadcasted to all interfaces.(2) Data Forwarding.When a Data packet is created by a replica node or the original producer, it carries the same name as in the Interest packet.Hence, the NDN node checks its PIT to verify if the requests have already been treated by him; if a match is found, the Data packet will be sent out to all interfaces listed in the PIT entry (multicast).Otherwise, the packet is considered an unsolicited packet and dropped immediately by the node.During the Data forwarding, the node decides based on its local caching policies, if the content should be cached or not.
It is important to highlight here that all NDN components (CS, PIT, and FIB) are involved in the Interest forwarding phase, while only PIT and CS are used in the Data forwarding.

Security and Privacy in NDN.
Preserving data security and preserving user privacy are the most important aspect of any of the today's network architecture and protocol [19].As the content in NDN is decoupled from its original location, NDN follows a content-based security concept [20] that consists of securing the content among different network elements regardless of the used communication channel: (1) Security.To ensure data authenticity, every Data packet is signed by the original producer using a public key.us, any node in the network can verify the data authenticity.Moreover, as Data can be cached in any place in the network, all necessary security-related information is traversed with the Data packets.Furthermore, data confidentiality and access control are supported by content encryption.
(2) Privacy.As compared to IP-based networks, any intermediate node can monitor user activities, by knowing who is requesting and what has been requested.However, in NDN, due to the use of Mobile Information Systems content names instead of host address, it is not an easy task to know who is requesting, but it is quite easy to know the requested content by monitoring the content names, where various attacks may be launched from different network levels using this vulnerability.us, both content and its name should be encrypted to provide high-level privacy.

NDN Advantages in VANETs.
Due to the change of user and application requirements in today's Internet, NDN aims to improve the network scalability and reliability.Towards this, various efforts have been shown tending to bring NDN to vehicular environments [21,22].Vehicles in such a merging network can act as data consumers, producers, and intermediates nodes at the same time.Figure 1 shows an example or running NDN architecture on top of the VANET network.

Content
Naming.NDN offers a clean, simple, and scale design that can support a large amount of content exchange among vehicles and with infrastructure.Hierarchical NDN names provide a wide addressing range that can be customized by network designers and carry different application semantics [23,24].Hence, different application properties can be integrated into the naming scheme to enhance the communication and improve users' needs.

Data Forwarding.
e clean content discovery and data delivery mechanisms in NDN make it a suitable solution for VANET [25][26][27] that can improve the content access among multiple consumers by aggregating the Interests in the first edge node and inherently support multicast communication without the need of extra management protocols.Also, native support of multiple physical interfaces at the same time promotes the necessity of NDN.

In-Network Caching.
e time and location decoupling concept in NDN enhances the data availability and improves the overall network performance [28][29][30].Data producers are not required to be connected all time to satisfy consumer requests, where the network layer can fulfill different demands especially the hot ones, by retrieving the content from the most closer cache stores.

Data Security.
NDN is a session-less architecture, where no session is required to fetch the content from producers or cache store.Also, all security mechanisms are applied to the content itself, by binding the content with its name using the public-private key concept.Hence, securing the communication channel in NDN is not an issue [31].
2.3.5.Mobility Enhancement.By using only the content name to fetch content from the network, NDN aims to enhance node mobility [32].Mobile nodes are not required to ask for a new address when connecting with the new network.ey only need to resend the nonsatisfied Interest by specifying the content name.

Security and Privacy Challenges in NDN-Based Vehicular Networks
By moving from a host-centric model to the informationcentric concept and using NDN as the primary communication model in VANET, most of the traditional networking aspects will be changed.is also leads to changes in the security and privacy concerns [20].Also, as ICN/NDN is still taking a shape, more issues will appear when running a largescale NDN-VANET or fully deployed NDN without overlay protocols.us, it is very important to focus on security and privacy in the first design phase.In this section, we first discuss the security and privacy issues in the NDN architecture, and then we classify the existing VANET attacks based on NDN and target only those attacks affecting networking and NDN aspects such as content, routing and forwarding, and caching.[19].In the following, we discuss briefly the most critical security issues.
As the network layer takes the responsibilities to satisfy the consumer requests via the ubiquitous in-network caching, different attacks may be launched from different network layers and entities for various goals such as interest flooding attack (due the use of content name), content poisoning attack, and cache poisoning/pollution attack (innetwork caching).Hence, the NDN layer should tackle DoS attacks and validate the requested content name.

Content-Name Binding.
e content name is the pillar element in ICN/NDN.All network-layer functionalities such as routing, forwarding, mobility, and security are based on the content name.e security of names reflects the network security.In NDN, content and name are bound and validated using the cryptographic function (e.g., public key and signature).Using this secure binding may prove the content ownership.However, in a large-scale network, content may be assigned to different names, which will affect the network scalability especially the routing plane.us, a secure control plane to assign names and validate content ownership is required.

Architecture Design.
Despite the clean NDN architecture design, some security issues may occur.As NDN communication is based on content name where no host addresses are included, the use of one single interface such as a wireless interface on a vehicle or another device may create a problem of looping in both Interest and Data packets.Even adding a sequence number may solve this problem, however, and according to in-network caching, any node in the network may satisfy the demands.Assuming a malicious node receives all other demands because of the explicit broadcast, it can reply with false content and satisfy these demands, and other nodes in the same rang will receive the Data packets, that by consequence remove the PIT entry where the correct data will be considered unsolicited and dropped by the NDN forwarding plane.In such a scenario, the original requester receives wrong data and will never receive the correct content.Another issue can occur on a node with multiple interfaces: as the Data forwarding plane involves only PIT, a Data packet can be delivered from an interface not indexed in the FIB table but valid on the PIT.Malicious nodes may use this vulnerability to purge all demands on PIT.

Coexistence Issues.
NDN can be deployed in three different modes: (a) overlay mode: running NDN on top of the TCP or IP protocol as an overlay layer; (b) coexistence with IP: a node may use the two stacks IP and NDN; and (c) clean-slate mode that consists of running NDN directly.e security of each mode depends on the security of the layer (e.g., IP or TCP).However, to show the real performance of NDN, a clean-slate deployment is required.
In the following sections, we classify VANET attacks into three categories: infrastructure attacks, content protection and access control, and content and user privacy.We overview each attack from both VANET and NDN perspectives and provide a review of existing solutions available.

Infrastructure Protection.
Protecting the infrastructure will by consequence provide high availability and resilience by guaranteeing that only the accurate data are available.Although NDN does not address the hosts directly, securing the infrastructure hosts and endpoints is intuitive, as they are responsible for providing the content.Furthermore, as NDN allows a distributed content caching, this by consequence will increase the content availability and mitigate DoS attacks, which is not always applicable in case of dynamic content that may be generated dynamically only by its original provider.[33] is the most famous and dangerous one in the vehicular network, where the attackers send huge requests to the system in order to shut down the network and stop the communication between vehicles and between vehicles and RSUs.

Denial of Service. Denial of service (DoS) attack
e goal of DoS is to stop sending or receiving information to vehicles about the network such as road status.
As NDN deals with content names instead of IP addresses, DoS attacks are based on the use of names [34] and may target consumers, producers, or intermediate nodes.
From the NDN point of view, a basic DoS attack can be an Interest flooding, where an attacker sends a storm of Interest asking for a different content that may not be available in the cache store.
Figure 2 depicts a simple DoS attack; vehicles, RSUs, and other network infrastructure elements are involved in this scenario.However, due to the Interest aggregation feature, intermediate nodes may have more chance to be targeted compared to the content provider, especially when requesting a fake content (i.e., content with a valid name prefix and invalid suffix).
e result of that is Interest dropping at the provider level and PIT entries after lifetime expiration at the intermediate nodes level.However, requesting a dynamic content that should be generated by the original content provider upon receiving the Interest (e.g., asking for a fresh patient report) may cause DoS at the provider level due to the fact that dynamic content is not popular and may not be aggregated by intermediate nodes.
A malicious vehicle sends a storm of different Interests asking for different content names, as RSU does not have the content, and it forwards the request and creates a new PIT.Because of the huge number of malicious Interests, the PIT is fitted, where a legitimate vehicle cannot send more requests, and may not benefit of the cache capabilities of the RSU or event forwarding its requests to other nodes.e attack is more severe when it comes to sensitive and urgent communications that may affect people's life.
Various countermeasure solutions have been proposed to overcome and mitigate DoS attacks, by using either ratelimiting mechanisms (e.g., per face or per name-prefix) Mobile Information Systems [35,36] or statistical modeling approaches [37,38].e former consists of monitoring the face/name-prefix timeout rates and/or the PIT size, when detecting a DoS attack, and the router limits the interest arrival rate (IAR) on the suspicious face, while the latter relies on statistical information about the PIT and interfaces to identify the abnormal traffic pattern.However, these solutions need to make an extensive modification of the regular PIT structure or excessive storage statistics.

Black-Hole and Gray-Hole Attacks.
Another dangerous attack, shown in Figure 3, that especially affects safety applications is the black-hole attack [39], where vehicle attackers engage other vehicles by claiming that they have the best route to the destination or have the best position to forward the packet.After the other vehicles send their packet to attackers, the malicious vehicle discards all packets from the network which caused lose of huge packets including critical information and safety messages.Similarly to the black-hole attack, in gray-hole attack, malicious vehicles act as black nodes and misguiding packets, filtering them according to their benefits.A single malicious node or a set of malicious nodes selects some packets to forward and drops others.
In a nutshell, NDN uses a name-based forwarding scheme to forward the requests and deliver data back to consumers.Solving the black-hole and gray-hole attacks can be achieved either by securing the forwarding plane itself or by using secure namespaces to forward name-prefixes that do not exist in the FIB table.Furthermore, as the NDN forwarding plane forwards Interest/Data packets without knowing who is requesting or who will serve, these attacks may not affect VANET-based NDN even by announcing that they have the best route.However, as NDN uses hierarchical names to identify content and services, a malicious node can easily monitor the forwarding system and filter based on content names that allowed and denied packets, which makes these attacks hard to solve in such cases especially when a group of malicious vehicles launches the attack.

Wormhole Attack.
e wormhole attack consists of creating a tunnel between two or more collaborative malicious vehicles, aiming to record and transmit data packets between them.Similarly to the black-hole attack, malicious vehicles engage other neighbor vehicles about the link between them as the best path to fetch the data instead of using the original trust path.After malicious vehicles receive packets from victim vehicles (Figure 4), they encapsulate and tunnel to another malicious vehicle, where the latter opens the encapsulated packets and spreads them in the network.
e main objective of this attack is to change the network logical topology and make lose the important information that is sent through the tunnel, as well as creating a private network among the malicious vehicles.In an IP-based network, attackers use their IP addresses to create the tunnel.However, due to the use of names instead of addresses and forwarding packets without the need to know who is requesting and to whom should forward, wormhole attack may not be successfully executed in NDN-based networks.

Man-in-the-Middle Attack (MiMA).
In man-in-themiddle attack, a malicious vehicle in the communication path keeps listing to all traversed information and injects false information between vehicles.is attack, as shown in Figure 5, has serious effects on the safety applications especially if the injected information is about accidents that may cause life-endangering accidents.anks to the content-based security, all information is signed by the original producer during its creation, and any changes in the data payload during the communication will be exposed to changes in the original signatures [40].
3.2.5.Summary and Insight.In this section, we have reviewed the existing VANET attacks that may affect the network infrastructure including DoS, black-hole, wormhole, gray-hole, and man-in-the-middle attacks.We found that because of using the content name instead of host addresses, many issues can be overcome, especially when binding the content name with the shared information.Also, providing content security at the packet level enhances the communication security.

Content Protection.
As each Data packet is self-signed in NDN, content requesters verify the content signature before consuming the content.Signature verification can also be done by intermediate nodes.However, it will cost more overhead and communication delay.e content signature may ensure data integrity, authentication, and correctness.

Bogus Information.
In this type of attack, a malicious vehicle may generate false or wrong information and send it to the network in order to manipulate other vehicles.We find other attacks that can be classified as bogus information attacks, such as the following: (1) False Position Information.Most of the safety applications are based on the particular position, where broadcasting false position information is a hard and critical issue in VANETs.A strong trust and validation model is needed to prevent such false information.Bogus information attack is usually associated with authentication security conditions, which is an easy task to deal with NDN, as the content is protected and authenticated at the packet level with a secure content-name binding of mechanisms based on hashing techniques and publicprivate keys.

Replay Attack.
In the replay attack, a malicious vehicle saves a copy of the message and resends it later in the network in order to deceive other vehicles, making unnecessary stopping.As NDN is a cache-based network, this attack can be overcome by using the content name and checking the lifetime value in Data packets to know the data freshness, compared with the requested content.

Summary and Insight.
Most of the existing NDN attacks related to content in VANETs can be solved by following the content-based security concept.Indeed, securing the content after its creation helps the content security life cycle.Also, when securing the content, access control rules and policies can be used to enforce who can access the content.Moreover, a robust trust model with the validation system is required in NDN to enforce content security and mitigate false content created by malicious nodes.

Content and User
Privacy.Regardless of the content protection level, the user and content privacy still can be compromised in NDN, especially by using plain-text names.Any malicious node may receive the traversing requests and data back.By monitoring the content names, attackers can create a fake content and cache it in any near cache store, that by consequence will be served for future requests.

Sybil and Masquerade
Attacks.Sybil attack is considered as one of the most dangerous attacks in VANETs, where the malicious vehicle acts that it is more than a hundred vehicles by creating chaos and a large number of pseudonymous as shown in Figure 6. e goal of this behavior is to deceive other vehicles that there is congestion and force them to change their routes.On the contrary, as the name indicates, in a masquerade attack, a malicious vehicle changes its identity [41] to be another vehicle, trying to produce different messages, alter, and replay with information to deceive other vehicles.For example, Mobile Information Systems a malicious vehicle can change its identity to be an ambulance and force other vehicles to slow down or change their routes.Works in [42,43] propose a trust model based on NDN for autonomous vehicular applications in order to prevent bugs information and vehicle tracking.e authors designed a hierarchical naming scheme that composed of four levels: autonomous vehicle, manufacturers, vehicles, and data.Furthermore, they used a pseudonym and proxy-based scheme in order to make it difficult for attackers to track vehicles.
NDN binds content names using cryptography algorithms such as public-private keys that may secure the binding and outdo these issues.Furthermore, distributed solutions such as blockchain can be applied to enforce the content-name binding and preserve content and user privacy.

Timing Attack.
In timing attacks, the malicious vehicles do not forward the emergency messages and information at the right time (Figure 7) they received it, by creating an explicit communication delay and adding time slots to the received messages.eir neighbor's vehicles receive these messages too late after the time they need it.
e timing attack is a critical issue, especially when dealing with time-constraint applications.

Snooping Attack.
Snooping is a passive attack, where the malicious vehicle accesses the content and information that traverse it, in order to use it for its benefits without modification.However, as the content is secure and signed, using cryptographic hashing techniques, when it has been created, only legitimate users can access it.Hence, snooping attack may not have an effect on VANET-based NDN.

Summary and Insight.
Content and user privacy issues are presented in this part.Content privacy can be preserved using the content-name-binding mechanisms, and more investigation is required in such a context.Also, due to the illumination of host addresses, monitoring attacks can be decreased.e only issue that can occur because of NDN names is the caching-related attacks.Finally, serious solutions and secure forwarding schemes are required to overcome the timing attacks.

Future Research Directions
Based on the presented security attacks and issues and their relation with NDN, in the following section, we identify several NDN research directions that may enhance and improve the security of the NDN architecture.Table 2 summarizes this discussion.

Denial of Service. Solutions based on limiting
Interest rate on the malicious interfaces or based on name-prefixes may end by punishing legitimate consumers and authorized requests.Hence, using the software-defined networking (SDN) approach [44] may detect DoS attack in the early stages using the global view of controllers and a per flow rate limiting that may yield highest fairness compared to interface/name-prefix-based solutions.Also, the core routers can collaborate to identify and filter the malicious nameprefixes and malicious traffic pattern using AI-based algorithms.

Content Poisoning.
e purpose of this attacker is to fill the node's cache stores with fake contents.All the existing solutions require performing a data packet signature verification at the intermediate nodes level, that affects the content retrieval delay; comparing content hash with the hash taken from the corresponding Interest may reduce the network scalability, or ranking the content using consumers' feedback, where attackers also have the chance to send malicious feedbacks.

Naming and Content-Name
Binding.Providing a secure naming scheme is still an open research challenge for ICN and NDN.A secure naming scheme should ensure an efficient and scalable binding between the name and the content that may avoid various types of attacks.All the existing binding schemes require signature verification for each and every data packet.is process is costly in terms of resources, as well as affects the data retrieval delay, where an intermediate node cannot perform it at the line speed rate.

Caching Pollution.
e main objective of the caching pollution attack is to diminish the operation of in-network caching and augment content retrieval latency.e existing solutions have a high computation overhead at intermediate nodes.We consider a collaborative caching scheme a suitable solution to help the core network to mitigate this attack by exchanging feedback between cache stores, keep only the popular content, and reduce the nonpopular ones.

Secrecy of Correspondence.
Preserving the SoC and content copyrights is one of the most critical privacy topics in the whole networking domain and not only ICN [31].From SoC perspectives, the content owner should state all privacy and content-use policies in the Data packet or in the content itself.We believe that the blockchain-like structure combined with the smart contract can be one of the promising solutions.e content owner specifies different smart contracts depending on the policies such as caching, providing, and consuming the content, that may be executed automatically when the action is triggered, to enforce SoC and content copyright.

Application Design Patterns.
Several application-level security mechanisms have been proposed in ICN such as the following: (i) request filtering that intends to identify and remove the unwanted or forged content from untrusted providers, by using provider's information (e.g., public keys and name-prefix) and consumers' votes for content ranking.(ii) Anomaly detection aims to detect unwanted activities or network misbehavior, using statistical data analyses, fuzzy detection algorithms, and traffic clustering.However, there is no all-in-one scheme that deals with the existing application-level threats or discusses the design patterns for a secure application in ICN, which is a strong future research topic.

Conclusion
NDN architecture is a suitable candidate for the future Internet, including vehicular communication.Deploying NDN on top of VANET is still in the early phase.Security and privacy issues have a strong impact on the success of such merging.is article addresses the major networking security and privacy issues in VANET from the perspective of the NDN communication model.e nature of VANET communication and applications changes the way of seeing security; also, adding the NDN model on VANET makes the task more challenging.We categorized VANET security

Table 1 :
Comparison of host-centric and information-centric models.
NDN Security and Privacy Issues.Despite the efforts shown in the NDN project and the research contributions, different security issues still exist in NDN

Table 2 :
Summary of issues and research directions.