This paper proposes a mathematical model of the multirotor system with a flexible coupling on spring supports on Lagrange's approach, which has taken into account the effects of dynamic angular misalignment and mass unbalance. Then its nonlinear dynamic behaviors of the system are discussed based on the method of multiple scales and numerical technique, respectively. The results show that the responses of the system in lateral directions contain a similar component to that of the mass unbalanced system on both the vibrating frequency and amplitude and involve the typical nonlinear components such as the ones from some combined frequencies; the results also reveal that the numerical agreements on the above-mentioned methods are perfect for the transient responses.
1. Introduction
The misalignment of rotor system is one of the most common mechanical faults in rotating machinery, which can cause excessive vibrations, produce bothering noises, and create damaging forces on rotors, bearings, and couplings. For large-scale rotating system, there are several reasons that lead to the misalignments such as the various deformations of rotors, uncoaxiality of bearings and couplings. According to the geometric relationship between the two rotors, the types of misalignment may be divided into the parallel and angle ones or their combination. In practical engineering, generally the misalignment appears in some main form, for example, the ground subsidence or looseness and improper assembly of the rotor system can induce the faults of angle misalignment. In fact, even a multirotor system is well aligned in static equilibrium state; it still presents the dynamic misalignment or offset in a rotor system which couples by a flexible coupling.
During the past decades, the dynamics of effects on the rotor misalignments has been studied in a variety of aspects, that is, firstly Gibbons [1] established a model to predict the additional forces due to the misalignment of the gear coupling, Dewell and Mitchell [2] analyzed the lateral vibration frequencies for a misaligned rotor system which were based on the experiment, and Li and Yu [3] discussed the coupled lateral and torsional vibration of a rotor-bearing system with the misalignment by a gear coupling. In paper [4], Al-Hussain and Redmond studied the effect of parallel misalignment on the lateral and torsional responses of two-rotor system, and in [5], Al-Hussain considered the effect of angular misalignment on the stability of rotors connected by a flexible mechanical coupling. Prabhakar et al. [6] dealt with the transient responses of a rotor system with a rotor misalignment by using the finite element method. Recently, Hili et al. [7] established a linear dynamic model of a multirotor system which couples a Cardan joint by using the finite element method, in which both of the faults misalignment and unbalance were considered. Lees [8] studied the misalignment of a rigidly coupled rotor which mounted on idealized linear bearings with a linear time-varying stiffness. Li [9] developed a mathematical model of a multirotor system by taking into account the effects of parallel misalignment and unbalance of rotors, in which the misalignment was dealt with as a holonomic constraint, and Slim et al. [10] paid attention to the dynamic behaviors of misaligned rotor system mounted on two journal bearings. Patel and Darpe [11] investigated vibrating responses of misaligned rotors modeled by using Timoshenko beam elements with six degrees of freedom, and in paper [12], they studied the frequency spectra of the system supported on rolling element bearings by experiment. In 2010, Redmond [13] developed a dynamic modal of misaligned shafts, which included both the static angular and parallel misalignment.
For the multirotor system, flexible couplings are commonly used to transmit torque from one rotor to another when the adjacent shafts are slightly misaligned. And yet it is required coaxially during the installation for avoiding the additional forces on bearings, for example, the force is not permitted to be produced for a flexible coupling under static conditions; however, it is aligned or coaxial in this state, the coupling still appears a dynamic misalignment at work [14], that is, a dynamic angular deformation is generated on the flexible coupling duo to the dynamic load. In the above discussions, while much work has been done on the dynamics of the system that an initial or static misalignment exists, the little attention has been paid to the dynamic one. Accordingly, the purpose of the present paper is to explain the vibration mechanism and dynamic characteristics of rotor system with a flexible coupling after considering the effect on the dynamic angular misalignment.
2. Motion Equations
The proposed model of the multirotor system connected by a flexible coupling is shown in Figure 1, in which m1 and m2denote the lumped masses, respectively; k1 and k2 represent the stiffness of the bearings; kt is the equivalent angular stiffness for the flexible couple. For simplification, the following assumptions upon the system of concern will be used hereinafter: (1) the two rotors are rigid; (2) the bearings are isotropic on dynamic performances; (3) the misaligned angle between the adjacent rotors is small.
Schematic diagram of angular-misaligned rotor system.
The coordinate system oxyz is set up in the static equilibrium position of rotor system as shown in Figure 1. Let O1(x1,y1,0) and O2(x2,y2,z2) be the coordinates of the mass centers of disc 1 and disc 2, respectively, then they yieldx1=x+e1cos(Ωt),y1=y+e1sin(Ωt),z1=0,x2=x+lsinθcos(Ωt)+e2cosθcos(Ωt+γ),y2=y+lsinθsin(Ωt)+e2cosθsin(Ωt+γ),z2=l+lcosθ,
where x and y are the displacements of disc 1 at the geometric center C1; θ is the angle between adjacent rotors; Ω is the rotating speed; γ is the initial phase angle; lis the rotor length; e1, e2 are the mass unbalances. If the generalized coordinates x, y, and θ are introduced, then (2.2) describes a nonstationary holonomic constraint because the displacement varies with time t. Generally, the offset h of disc 2 is larger than e2; therefore, the terms related to e2 are ignored in the paper.
The kinetic energy of the system can be written asT=∑i=1212mi(ẋi2+ẏi2+żi2),
and the potential energy isU=∑i=1212ki(xi2+yi2)+12ktθ2.
For simplifying the representation furthermore, let m1=m2=m,k1=k2=k, and e1=e, then substituting (2.1) and (2.2) into (2.3) and (2.4), and based on Lagrange’s equationddt(∂T∂q̇j)-∂T∂qj+∂U∂qj=0,qj=[xyθ]T,
the motion equation in the generalized coordinates becomes 2mẍ+mlθ̈cosθcosΩt-mlθ̇2sinθcosΩt-2mlΩθ̇cosθsinΩt-mlΩ2sinθcosΩt+2kx+klsinθcosΩt=meΩ2cosΩt,2mÿ+mlθ̈cosθsinΩt-mlθ̇2sinθsinΩt+2mlΩθ̇cosθcosΩt-mlΩ2sinθsinΩt+2ky+klsinθsinΩt=meΩ2sinΩt,ml2θ̈+mlẍcosθcosΩt+mlÿcosθsinΩt-ml2Ω2sinθcosθ+klxcosθcosΩt+klycosθsinΩt+kl2sinθcosθ+ktθ=0.
The above equations are second-order ordinary differential ones with variable coefficients, which is obviously the characteristic of strong nonlinearity. Based on the theory of differential equations, it is difficult to solve. By applying the inverse operation, (2.6) can be expressed asẍ-1ml(1+sin2θ)[ml2θ̇2sinθcosΩt+2ml2Ωθ̇cosθsinΩt-ml2Ωθ̇cos3θsinΩt+ml2Ω2sin3θcosΩt-kl2sin3θcosΩt-klx(1+sin2θ)+ktθcosθcosΩt+meΩ2lcosΩtl2θ̇2]=0,ÿ-1ml(1+sin2θ)[ml2θ̇2sinθsinΩt-2ml2Ωθ̇cosθcosΩt+ml2Ωθ̇cos3θcosΩt+ml2Ω2sin3θsinΩt-kl2sin3θsinΩt-kly(1+sin2θ)+ktθcosθsinΩt+meΩ2lsinΩtl2θ̇2]=0,θ̈+1ml2(1+sin2θ)[ml2θ̇2sinθcosθ-ml2Ω2sinθcosθ+kl2sinθcosθ+2ktθ+meΩ2lcosθl2θ̇2]=0.
Let X=x/r, Y=y/r be the nondimensional displacements, in which r is the radius of rotor; E=e/r, L=l/r are the nondimensional mass eccentricity and rotor length, respectively; τ=Ωt is the nondimensional time; ω0=k/mΩ2, ωt=kt/ml2Ω2 are the nondimensional angular frequencies and denote dx/dt=x′(dX/dτ)=X′…; accordingly, (2.7) can be cast into the following nondimensional form:X′′-1(1+sin2θ)[L(θ′)2sinθcosτ+2Lθ′cosθsinτ-Lθ′cos3θsinτ-(ω02-1)Lsin3θcosτ-ω02X(1+sin2θ)+ωt2Lθcosθcosτ+Ecosτ(θ′)2]=0,Y′′-1(1+sin2θ)[L(θ′)2sinθsinτ-2Lθ′cosθcosτ+Lθ′cos3θcosτ-(ω02-1)Lsin3θsinτ-ω02Y(1+sin2θ)+ωt2Lθcosθsinτ+Esinτ(θ′)2]=0,θ′′+1(1+sin2θ)[(θ′)2sinθcosθ+(ω02-1)sinθcosθ+2ωt2θ+ELcosθ]=0.
Equation (2.8) is a parametrically excited system with three degrees of freedom on the theory of nonlinear vibration, in which ω0 and ωt are the frequency ratios, respectively; εis the nondimensional mass eccentricity L is the nondimensional length. In the above equation, the third one is decoupled with the first two equations, that is, the generalized coordinate θ is totally independent of X and Y thereby it can be solved in the first place.
In the case of the initial angular misalignment, it can be assumed that θ=α+φ(t) in which α is the constant angle and φ(t) is its perturbation. After substituting θ into (2.8) and expanding the relevant terms in the Taylor series, after neglecting the higher-order ones the governing equations that is of the initial or static angular misalignment between two rotors are obtainedX′′-1(1+sin2α)[L(φ′)2sinαcosτ+Lφ′(1+sin2α)cosαsinτ-(ω02-1)Lsin3αcosτ-ω02(1+sin2α)X+ωt2Lαcosαcosτ+Ecosτ(φ′)2]-φ(1+sin2α)[L(φ′)2cosαcosτ+Lφ′(3cos2α-2)sinαsinτ-2ω02Xcosαsinα-ωt2L(αsinα-cosα)cosτ+3L(1-ω02)sin2αcosαcosτ(φ′)2]+φsin2α(1+sin2α)2[L(φ′)2sinαcosτ+Lφ′(1+sin2α)cosαsinτ+ωt2αLcosαcosτ-ω02(1+sin2α)X+L(1-ω02)sin3αcosτ+Ecosτ(φ′)2]=0,Y′′-1(1+sin2α)[L(φ′)2sinαsinτ-Lφ′(1+sin2α)cosαcosτ-(ω02-1)Lsin3αsinτ-ω02(1+sin2α)Y+ωt2Lαcosαsinτ+Esinτ(φ′)2]-φ(1+sin2α)[L(φ′)2cosαsinτ+Lφ′(2-3cos2α)sinαcosτ-2ω02Ycosαsinα-ωt2L(αsinα-cosα)sinτ+3L(1-ω02)sin2αcosαsinτ(φ′)2]+φsin2α(1+sin2α)2[L(φ′)2sinαsinτ-Lφ′(1+sin2α)cosαcosτ+ωt2αLcosαsinτ-ω02(1+sin2α)Y+L(1-ω02)sin3αsinτ+Esinτ(φ′)2]=0,φ′′+1(1+sin2α)[(φ′)2sinαcosα+2ωt2α+(ω02-1)sinαcosα+ELcosα]+φ(1+sin2α){(φ′)2cos2α+2ωt2+(ω02-1)cos2α-ELsinα-φsin2α(1+sin2α)2[EL(φ′)2sinαcosα+2ωt2α+(ω02-1)sinαcosα+ELcosα]}=0.
3. The Approximation Solution
For discussing the vibration mechanism and characteristics of the system conveniently, let α=0, namely, the initial or static angular misalignment of a flexible coupling vanishes, and only the dynamic angular misalignment presents in the system, then (2.9) reduces toX′′-L(φ′)2φcosτ-Lφ′sinτ+ω02X-ωt2Lφcosτ=Ecosτ,Y′′-L(φ′)2φsinτ+Lφ′cosτ+ω02Y-ωt2Lφsinτ=Esinτ,φ′′+(φ′)2φ+(ω02+2ωt2-1)φ+EL=0.
The third of (3.1) is uncoupled with the first two; therefore, it can be simplified asϕ′′+(ϕ′)2ϕ+ϖ02ϕ=0,
where ϕ=φ+E/Lϖ2, ϖ02=ω02+2ωt2-1.
The method of multiple scales (MMSs) is introduced for the approximation solution of the nonlinear vibration in this work. For the small angle ϕ, let T=ωτ and expand ϕ and ω [15] asϕ(T,ε)=εϕ1(T)+ε3ϕ3(T),ω=ϖ0+ε2ω2,
where ε stands for a small nondimensional parameter characterizing the amplitude of the motion. The term ε2ϕ2(τ) is missing from (3.3) because the nonlinearity appears at O(ε3). The term εω1 is absent from (3.4) because the frequency is independent of the sign of ε. Substituting (3.3) and (3.4) into (3.2) and equating coefficients of like powers of ε, after donating dϕ/dT=ϕ*, it yieldsϖ02(ϕ1**+ϕ1)=0,ϖ02(ϕ3**+ϕ3)=-2ϖ0ω2ϕ1**-ϖ02(ϕ1*)2ϕ1.
The solution of (3.5) is of the formϕ1=acos(T+β),
where a and β are constants; hence, (3.6) becomesϕ3**+ϕ3=(ω2ϖ0-14a2)acos(T+β)+14a3cos(3T+3β).
Eliminating the secular term in (3.8) gives ω2=(1/4)ϖ0a2, then disregarding the solution of the homogeneous equation, its solution reduces toϕ3=-a332cos(3T+3β).
From the equation ϕ=φ+E/Lϖ2, it follows thatφ=-ELϖ02+εacosψ-ε3a332cos3ψ,
in which ψ=ωτ+β, ω=ϖ0(1+ε2a2/4). If imposing the initial conditions φ|τ=0=0and φ*|τ=0=0, then the constants εa and β are obtainedεacosβ-ε3a332cos3β=ELϖ02,sinβ(1+332ε2a2-38ε2a2cos2β)=0.
When β=0, εa yieldsεa-ε3a332=ELϖ02.
In practice, E/Lϖ02 is small, thus the solution becomes β=0,εa≈E/Lϖ02. For example, if the parameters L=20.0 and E=0.03, 0.05, the errors between them can be neglected at all. The numerical results are shown in Figure 2, which indicate a good agreements under the concerned parameters.
Numerical results forεa and E/Lϖ2 with increasing ω0 or ωt.
ω0=1.2
ωt=0.02
Generally for the above nonlinear equations, there are six real solutions, in which the root β=0,εa≈E/Lϖ2is only satisfied for small oscillation in engineering, that is, the systematic parameters are considered as ωo=1.2, ωt=0.02, L=20.0, and E=0.05, accordinglyϖ0=ω02+2ωt2-1=0.664, and after solving (3.11) on Maple, the six real roots of (3.12) areβ=0,εa=0.00567≈ELϖ2,β=0,εa=-5.65969,β=0,εa=5.65402,β=π,εa=-0.00567≈-ELϖ2,β=π,εa=5.65969,β=π,εa=-5.65402.
The proves thatβ=0,εa≈E/Lϖ2 is an available approximate solution, β=0, andεa=-5.696,5.65402 are not almost changed with increasing the parameters ωo and ωt, which are not suitable for the engineering. Thereby, the former will be paid more attention to the following analysis, then expression (3.10) leads toφ=ELϖ02(cos(ωτ)-1)-132(ELϖ02)3cos(3ωτ).
Substituting expression (3.14) into (3.1), it yieldsX′′+ω02X=Eω02+ωt2-1ϖ02cos(τ)+Eϖ02(ωt2cos(ωτ)cos(τ)-ωsin(ωτ)sin(τ))+O(E2),Y′′+ω02Y=Eω02+ωt2-1ϖ02sinτ+Eϖ02(ωt2cos(ωτ)sin(τ)+ωsin(ωτ)cos(τ))+O(E2),
and its general solution givesX=C1cosω0τ+C2sinω0τ+Eω02+ωt2-1ϖ02(ω02-1)cosτ+E2ϖ02(ωt2+ωω02-(ω+1)2cos(ω+1)τ+ωt2-ωω02-(ω-1)2cos(ω-1)τ)+O(E2),Y=C3cosω0τ+C4sinω0τ+Eω02+ωt2-1ϖ02(ω02-1)sinτ+E2ϖ02(ωt2+ωω02-(ω+1)2sin(ω+1)τ-ωt2-ωω02-(ω-1)2sin(ω-1)τ)+O(E2),
where ω=ω02+2ωt2-1(1+(E/2Lϖ2)2), and C1,C2,C3,andC4are the constants.
If the initial conditionsX(0)=X′(0)=0 and Y(0)=Y′(0)=0 are introduced, the constants C1,C2,C3, and C4 can be determined easily; therefore, the responses can be shown to reduce toX=-(A+B+D)cosω0τ+Acosτ+Bcos(ω+1)τ+Dcos(ω-1)τ,Y=D(ω-1)-B(ω+1)-Aω0sinω0τ+Asinτ+Bsin(ω+1)τ-Dsin(ω-1)τ,
in which A=E((ω02+ωt2-1)/ϖ02(ω02-1)),B=E(ωt2+ω)/2ϖ02(ω02-(ω+1)2), and D=E(ωt2-ω)/2ϖ02(ω02-(ω-1)2).
The above solution shows that the response consists of the following components: (a) the free vibration at natural frequency ω0 of the derived linear system. If the damping is concerned in x and y direction, its amplitude will be decreased exponentially on the theory of vibration; (b) forced vibration excited by the mass unbalance at the frequency of rotating speed. When ω0=1, that is, the rotating speed coincides with the lateral natural frequency, the bending resonance of rotor system occurs; (c) the angular motions due to the flexible coupling, in which the frequencies ω-1and ω+1 are combined by ω and the rotating speed. It is a typical nonlinear oscillation because the combination resonances exist atω0=ω-1andω0=ω+1.
Certainly, it should be noted that the above solution only reveals some dynamic behaviors of the rotor system connected to a flexible coupling, and some other characteristics such as the subharmonic resonances may be emerged if suitable conditions are satisfied.
4. Numerical Analysis
Because (2.8) is a strongly nonlinear system, the numerical technique is preferable. Accordingly, the Runge-Kutta method is carried out to predict the dynamic characteristics in the present paper. As a nonautonomous system, traditionally (2.8) is discussed on the state space, and hence the three second-order equations can be converted easily to six first-order onesX′=η,Y′=ξ,θ′=ϑ,η′=1(1+sin2θ)[Lϑ2sinθcosτ+2Lϑcosθsinτ-Lϑcos3θsinτ-(ω02-1)Lsin3θcosτ-ω02X(1+sin2θ)+ωt2Lθcosθcosτ+Ecosτ],ξ′=1(1+sin2θ)[Lϑ2sinθsinτ-2Lϑcosθcosτ+Lϑcos3θcosτ-(ω02-1)Lsin3θsinτ-ω02Y(1+sin2θ)+ωt2Lθcosθsinτ+Esinτ],ϑ′=-1(1+sin2θ)[ϑ2sinθcosθ+(ω02-1)sinθcosθ+2ωt2θ+ELcosθ].
For the following calculation, the values of systematic parameters are considered as ω0=1.20, ωt=0.02, and L=20, and all the initial generalized displacements and velocities are set to zero.
Figures 3(a) and 4(a) depict the displacement responses of rotor system in x and y directions whenE=0.05, respectively, in which the curves are demonstrated by using MMS and the numerical technique. The results show that the agreements between their responses are pretty almost at each interval, and thereby it proves that the dynamic behaviors of the system are in the form of (3.17) under certain initial conditions. Figures 3(b) and 4(b) appear as the frequency spectra of displacement responses by the numerical method, in which there are mainly four components from the vibrating frequencies:f1=(ω-1)/2π=0.05349,f2=1/2π=0.15915, f3=ω0/2π=0.19099, and f4=(ω+1)/2π=0.26482. Actually, it reveals that the synchronous motion f2 emerges in the responses, which are obviously from the mass unbalance, and f3 is the natural frequency of the derived linear system as shown in (3.15), f1 and f4 are the combinations between ω/2π and the rotating speed Ω, which occur frequently for a nonlinear system. Figures 5 and 6 also show the relevant responses and the spectra when E=0.03. Figures 7 and 8 illustrate the responses and their spectra whenE=0.05, and ω0=1.20, ωt=0.50, namely, the angular stiffness of flexible coupling increases these vibration characteristics display the multifrequency signatures in the rotor system connected a flexible coupling with a dynamic angular misalignment.
The nondimensional response and its frequency spectrum in x direction when E=0.05: (a) response; (b) spectrum.
The nondimensional response and its frequency spectrum in y direction whenE=0.05: (a) response; (b) spectrum.
The nondimensional response and its frequency spectrum in x direction whenE=0.03: (a) response; (b) spectrum.
The nondimensional response and its frequency spectrum in y direction whenE=0.03: (a) response; (b) spectrum.
The nondimensional response and its frequency spectrum in x direction when ω0=1.20, ωt=0.50, and E=0.05: (a) response; (b) spectrum.
The nondimensional response and its frequency spectrum in y direction when ω0=1.20, ωt=0.50, and E=0.05: (a) response; (b) spectrum.
5. Conclusions
The misalignment of rotor system is an important reason which causes mechanical vibration; a dynamic misalignment or offset of the rotors can be produced at work even the system is aligned under the static conditions. In this paper, firstly a mathematic model of the multirotor system with a flexible coupling is established after considering the effect on a dynamic angular misalignment based on Lagrange’s equation, and it shows that the system is of a parametric oscillation with strongly nonlinear characteristics. Then, the method of multiple scales and Runge-Kutta numerical technique are carried out, respectively. And the results indicate that the responses in lateral direction consist of some parts, that is, the synchronous vibration due to the mass unbalance, the free vibration at natural frequency of the derived linear system, and the angular motions caused by the flexible coupling at the combined frequencies.
Acknowledgment
The author acknowledges the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (Grant no. 11072190).
GibbonsC. B.Coupling misalignment forcesProceedings of the 5th Turbo-Machinery Symposium1976Gas Turbine Laboratories, Texas A&M University111116DewellD. L.MitchellL. D.Detection of a misalignment disk coupling using spectrum analysis198410619162-s2.0-0021144013LiM.YuL.Analysis of the coupled lateral torsional vibration of a rotor-bearing system with a misaligned gear coupling200124322833002-s2.0-003597840210.1006/jsvi.2000.3412Al-HussainK. M.RedmondI.Dynamic response of two rotors connected by rigid mechanical coupling with parallel misalignment200224934834982-s2.0-003712248210.1006/jsvi.2001.3866Al-HussainK. M.Dynamic stability of two rigid rotors connected by a flexible coupling with angular misalignment200326622172342-s2.0-014167632110.1016/S0022-460X(02)01627-9PrabhakarS.SekharA. S.MohantyA. R.Vibration analysis of a misaligned rotor-coupling-bearing system passing through the critical speed200121512141714282-s2.0-003570073710.1243/0954406011524784HiliM. A.FakhfakhT.HaddarM.Failure analysis of a misaligned and unbalanced flexible rotor20066473822-s2.0-3384560389110.1361/154770206X117540LeesA. W.Misalignment in rigidly coupled rotors20073051-22612712-s2.0-3424998418810.1016/j.jsv.2007.04.008LiM.Nonlinear dynamics of a rotor system subject to a holonomic constraint of parallel misalignment2007145222226SlimB.MolkaA. H.MohamedM.TaherF.MohamedH.Dynamic behaviour of hydrodynamic journal bearings in presence of rotor spatial angular misalignment2009448154815592-s2.0-6734925148810.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.12.003PatelT. H.DarpeA. K.Vibration response of misaligned rotors200932536096282-s2.0-6734914408810.1016/j.jsv.2009.03.024PatelT. H.DarpeA. K.Experimental investigations on vibration response of misaligned rotors2009237223622522-s2.0-6734926233810.1016/j.ymssp.2009.04.004RedmondI.Study of a misaligned flexibly coupled shaft system having nonlinear bearings and cyclic coupling stiffness—theoretical model and analysis201032967007202-s2.0-7084911910010.1016/j.jsv.2009.09.039ZhaoG.YuY.GaoS.SunT.LiuZ.Study on dynamic misalignment of coupled rotor-coupling-isolator system in marine power plant2011Wuhan, China10.1109/APPEEC.2011.5748825NayfehA. H.MookD. T.1979New York, NY, USAWiley