MPE Mathematical Problems in Engineering 1563-5147 1024-123X Hindawi Publishing Corporation 673648 10.1155/2012/673648 673648 Review Article On 1/f Noise Li Ming 1,2 Zhao Wei 1 Cattani Carlo 1 Department of Computer and Information Science University of Macau Avenida Padre Tomas Pereira Taipa Macau umac.mo 2 School of Information Science & Technology East China Normal University Shanghai 200062 China ecnu.edu.cn 2012 17 12 2012 2012 11 10 2012 23 10 2012 2012 Copyright © 2012 Ming Li and Wei Zhao. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Due to the fact that 1/f noise gains the increasing interests in the field of biomedical signal processing and living systems, we present this introductive survey that may suffice to exhibit the elementary and the particularities of 1/f noise in comparison with conventional random functions. Three theorems are given for highlighting the particularities of 1/f noise. The first says that a random function with long-range dependence (LRD) is a 1/f noise. The secondindicates that a heavy-tailed random function is in the class of 1/f noise. The third provides a type of stochastic differential equations that produce 1/f noise.

1. Introduction

The pioneering work of 1/f noise may refer to the paper by Schottky , where he introduced the concept of two classes of noise. One class is thermal noise, such as the random motion of molecules in the conductors. The other is the shot noise, which may be caused by randomness of the emission from the cathode and the randomness of the velocity of the emitted electrons [1, 2]. Johnson described the latter using the term of the Schottky effect , which may be the first paper in the sense of expressing such a type of processes by the term of 1/f noise.

Let x(t)(-<t<) be a random function. Let Sxx(f) be its power spectrum density (PSD) function, where f=ω/2π is frequency and ω is radian frequency. Then, by 1/f noise, one means that Sxx(f) for f0. Note that the PSD of a conventional random function, such as (1/(a2+(2πf)2))(a0), is convergent at f=0. In the field, the term “1/f noise” is a collective noun, which implies in fact (1/fβ)(β>0) noise. In the general case, 1/f noise has the meaning of 1/fα noise for αR, where R is the set of real numbers; see, for example, . However, since limf0(1/fα)=0 for α<0, one may usually not be interested in the case of α<0. In what follows, we discuss the noise of 1/fβ type for β>0 unless otherwise stated.

Since the notion of 1/f noise appeared , it has gained increasing interests of scientists in various fields, ranging from bioengineering to computer networks; see, for example, , simply to mention a few. That fact gives rise to a question of what 1/f noise is. The question may be roughly answered in a way that a 1/f noise x(t) is such that its PSD Sxx(f) is divergent at f=0 as previously mentioned. Nonetheless, that answer may be never enough to describe the full picture of 1/f noise. By full picture, we mean that we should describe a set of main properties of 1/f noise, in addition to the property limf0(1/fβ)= in frequency domain. When regarding limf0(1/fβ)= as its first property, denoted by P1, we would like to list other three as follows.

What is the qualitative structure of an autocorrelation function (ACF) of 1/f noise? For this property, we will discuss the statistical dependence based on the hyperbolically decayed ACF structure.

What is the main property of its probability density function (PDF)? With P3, we will explain the heavy-tailed property of 1/f noise, which may produce random functions without mean or variance.

What is the possible structure of the differential equation to synthesize 1/f noise?

For facilitating the description of the full picture of 1/f noise, we will brief the preliminaries in Section 2. Then, P2–P4 will be discussed in Sections 35, respectively. After that, we will conclude the paper in Section 6.

2. Preliminaries 2.1. Dependence of Random Variables

A time series x(t) may also be called a random function . The term random function apparently exhibits that x(ti)  (i=0,1,) is a random variable, implying (2.1)x(ti)x(tj)forij(i,j=0,1,). We would like to discuss the dependence of x(ti) and x(tj) for ij, as well as x(t).

2.1.1. Dependence Description of Random Variables with Probability

Let P{x(ti)<x1} be the probability of the event {x(ti)<x1}. Denote by P{x(tj)<x2} the probability of the event {x(tj)<x2}. Then , {x(ti)<x1} and {x(tj)<x2} are said to be independent events if (2.2)P[{x(ti)<x1}{x(tj)<x2}]=P{x(ti)<x1}P{x(tj)<x2}. If {x(ti)<x1} and {x(tj)<x2} are dependent, on the other side, (2.3)P[{x(ti)<x1}{x(tj)<x2}]=P{x(tj)<x2}P[{x(ti)<x1}{x(tj)<  x2}], where P[{x(ti)<x1}{x(tj)<x2}] is the conditional probability, implying that the probability of the event {x(ti)<x1} provided that {x(tj)<x2} has occurred.

Note 1.

The dependence of {x(ti)<x1} and {x(tj)<x2} is reflected in the conditional probability P[{x(ti)<x1}{x(tj)<x2}]. If {x(ti)<x1} and {x(tj)<x2} are independent, P[{x(ti)<x1}{x(tj)<x2}]=P{x(ti)<x1}.

2.1.2. Dependence Description of Gaussian Random Variables with Correlation

Let x(t) be a Gaussian random function. Denote by corr[{x(ti)<x1},{x(tj)<x2}] the correlation coefficient between {x(ti)<x1} and {x(tj)<x2}. Then [57, 58], {x(ti)<x1} and {x(tj)<x2} are independent if (2.4)corr[{x(ti)<x1},{x(tj)<x2}]=a=0. On the other hand, {x(ti)<x1} and {x(tj)<x2} are dependent provided that (2.5)corr[{x(ti)<x1},{x(tj)<x2  }]=b0.

The condition (2.4) or (2.5) expressed by the correlation coefficient regarding the independence or dependence may not be enough to identify the independence or dependence of a Gaussian random function completely. For example, when tj=ti+τ, that (2.4) holds for large τ may not imply that it is valid for small τ. In other words, one may encounter the situations expressed by (2.6)corr[{x(ti)<x1},{x(ti+τ)<  x2}]=  0for  large  τ,(2.7)corr[{x(ti)<x1},{x(ti  +  τ)<x2}]0for  small  τ. By using the concept of probability, (2.6) corresponds to (2.8)P[{x(ti)<x1}{x(ti  +τ)<x2}]=P{x(ti)<x1}P{x(ti+τ)<x2}for  large  τ. Similarly, (2.7) corresponds to (2.9) (2.9)P[{x(ti)<x1}{x(ti+  τ)<x2}]=P{x(ti+τ)<x2}P[{x(ti)<x1}{x(ti+τ)<x2}]for  small  τ.

Note 2.

The notion of the dependence or independence of a set of random variables plays a role in the axiomatic approach of probability theory and stochastic processes; see Kolmogorov .

The above example exhibits an interesting fact that the dependence or independence relies on the observation scale or observation range. In conventional time series, we do not usually consider the observation scale. That is, (2.2) and (2.3) or (2.4) and (2.5) hold for all observation ranges no matter whether τ is small or large; see, for example, [60, 61]. Statistical properties that depend on observation ranges are briefed by Papoulis and Pillai  and Fuller  but detailed in Beran [63, 64].

Note 3.

The Kolmogorov’s work on axiomatic approach of probability theory and stochastic processes needs the assumption that {x(ti)<x1} and {x(tj)<x2} are independent in most cases likely for the completeness of his theory. Nevertheless, he contributed a lot in random functions that are range dependent; see, for example, [65, 66].

2.1.3. Dependence Description of Gaussian Random Variables with ACF

Denote by rxx(τ,t) the ACF of x(t). Denote by E the operator of mean. Then, it is given by (2.10)rxx(τ,t)=E[x(t)x(t+τ)]. It represents the correlation between the one point x(t) and the other τ apart, that is, x(t+τ). For facilitating the discussions, we assume that x(t) is stationary in the wide sense (stationary for short). With this assumption, rxx(τ,t) only replies on the lag τ. Therefore, one has (2.11)rxx(τ,t)=rxx(τ)=E[x(t)x(t+τ)]. In the normalized case, (2.12)0|rxx(τ)|1. ACF is a convenient tool of describing the dependence of a Gaussian random function x(t). For instance, on the one hand, we say that any two different points of x(t) are uncorrelated, accordingly independent as x(t) is Gaussian, if rxx(τ)=0. That is the case of Gaussian white noise. On the other hand, any two different points of x(t) are strongest dependent if rxx(τ)=1. This is the case of the strongest long-range dependence. In the case of 0<|rxx(τ)|<1, the value of |rxx(τ)| varies with the lag τ=(t+τ)-t.

A useful measure called correlation time, which is denoted by τc [67, page  74], is defined in the form (2.13)τc=1limT0Trxx(τ)dτlimT0Tτrxx(τ)dτ. By correlation time, we say that the correlation can be neglected if τcτ, where τ is the time scale of interest .

Note 4.

For a conventional Gaussian random function x(t), its correlation can be neglected if τcτ. This implies that the statistical dependence or independence of x(t) relies on its correlation time τc. However, we will show in Note 8 that correlation time fails if x(t) is a 1/f noise.

2.2. ACF and PSD

The PSD of x(t) is the Fourier transform of its ACF. That is, (2.14)Sxx(f)=-rxx(t)e-j2πftdt,j=-1. Equivalently, (2.15)rxx(τ)=-Sxx(f)ej2πfτdf. Letting f=0 in (2.14) yields (2.16)Sxx(0)=-rxx(τ)dτ. Similarly, letting τ=0 in (2.15) produces (2.17)rxx(0)=-Sxx(f)df.

Note 5.

Equation (2.16) implies that an ACF rxx(τ) is integrable if Sxx(0)<. On the other side, a PSD Sxx(f) is integrable when rxx(0)< as indicated in (2.17). Both are usual cases in conventional random functions.

Note 6.

The noise of 1/f type has the property Sxx(0)=, which makes 1/f noise substantially different from conventional random functions.

2.3. Mean and Variance

Denote by p(x) the PDF of x(t). Then, the mean denoted by μ(t) is given by (2.18)μ(t)=E[x(t)]=-xp(x)dx. The variance denoted by σ2(t) is in the form (2.19)σ2(t)=E{[x(t)-μ(t)]2}=-[x(t)-μ(t)]2p(x)dx. Assume that x(t) is stationary. Then, μ(t) and σ2(t) do not rely on time t. In this case, they are expressed by (2.20)μ(t)  =  μ,σ2(t)=σ2. Without generality losing, we always assume that x(t) is stationary in what follows unless otherwise stated.

Denote by Cxx(τ) the autocovariance of x(t). Then, (2.21)Cxx(τ)=E{[x(t)-μ][x(t+τ)-μ]}=-[x(t)-μ][x(t+τ)-μ]p(x)dx. Taking into account (2.19) and (2.21), one has (2.22)Cxx(0)=σ2. Denote by Ψ the mean square value of x(t). Then, (2.23)Ψ=E[x2(t)]=-x2p(x)dx. Considering rxx(τ) given by (2.24)rxx(τ)=E[x(t)x(t+τ)]=-x(t)x(t+τ)p(x)dx, one has (2.25)Ψ=rxx(0). Therefore, (2.26)σ2=Ψ-μ2.

It is worth noting that the above number characteristics are crucial to the analysis of x(t) in practice; see, for example, [6062, 6587], just to cite a few. However, things turn to be complicated if x(t) is in the class of 1/f noise. In Section 4 below, we will show that μ and/ or σ2 may not exist for specific types of 1/f noise.

3. Hyperbolically Decayed ACFs and <inline-formula><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M164"><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Noise

The qualitative structure of 1/f noise is in the form K/fβ, where K is a constant. Since limf0(K/fβ)=, as we previously mentioned several times, its ACF is nonintegrable over (-,). That is, (3.1)Sxx(0)=-rxx(τ)dτ=.

Note that the above may be taken as a definition of LRD property of a random function; see, for example, [4, 63, 64, 8890]. Thus, the above exhibits that 1/f noise is LRD. Consequently, rxx(τ) of a 1/f noise x(t) may have the asymptotic property given by (3.2)rxx(τ)~c|τ|-γ,c>0,  0<γ<1,  τ. Following , we have the Fourier transform of |τ|-γ in the form (3.3)F(|τ|-γ)=-|τ|-γe-j2πfτdτ=2sin(πγ2)Γ(1-γ)|2πf|γ-1. From the above, we have (3.4)γ=1-β. Thus, we have the following note.

Note 7.

Qualitatively, the ACF of 1/f noise is in the structure of power function. It follows power law. This is the answer to P2 explained in the Introduction.

Example 3.1.

A well-known example of 1/f noise is the fractional Gaussian noise (fGn) [93, 94]. Its ACF is in the form (3.5)rfGn(τ)=VH2[(|τ|+1)2H+||τ|-1|2H-2|τ|2H], where 0<H<1 is the Hurst parameter; VH=(Hπ)-1Γ(1-2H)cos(Hπ) is the strength of fGn. Its PSD is in the form  (3.6)SfGn(f)=VHsin(Hπ)Γ(2H+1)|2πf|1-2H.

Example 3.2.

Another example of 1/f noise is fractional Brownian motion (fBm). The PSD of the fBm of the Weyl type is in the form [95, 96] (3.7)SfBm,Weyl(t,f)=1|2πf|2H+1(1-21-2Hcos4πft),0<H<1. The PSD of the fBm of the Riemann-Liouville type is given by  (3.8)SfBm,Riemann-Liouville(t,f)=πωt(2πf)2H+1[JH(4πft)H-1(4πft)-JH-1(4πft)H(4πft)], where JH is the Bessel function of order H and H is the Struve function of order H, respectively.

Example 3.3.

The Cauchy-class process with LRD discussed in [100, 101] is a case of 1/f noise. Its ACF is in the form (3.9)rCauchy-class(τ)=(1+|τ|2)-b/2,0<b<1. Its PSD is given by (3.10)SCauchy-class(f)=-(1+|τ|2)-b/2e-j2πfτdτ=2(1-b)/2πΓ(b/2)|2πf|1/2(b-1)K1/2(b-1)(|2πf|), where Kν(·) is the modified Bessel function of the second kind. It has the asymptotic expression for f0 in the form, being 1/f noise, (3.11)SCauchy-class(f)~Γ[(1/2)(1-b)]2bπΓ(b/2)|2πf|b-1.

Example 3.4.

The generalized Cauchy process with LRD reported in  is an instance of 1/f noise. Its ACF is given by (3.12)rGC(τ)=(1+|τ|α)-β/α, where 0<α2 and 0<β<1. Its PSD in the complete form refers to . The following may suffice to exhibit its 1/f noise behavior : (3.13)SGC(f)~1Γ(β)cos(βπ/2)|2πf|β-1,f0. It may be worthwhile for us to write a theorem and a note when this section will soon finish.

Theorem 3.5.

If a random function x(t) is LRD, it belongs to the class of 1/f noise and vice versa.

Proof.

LRD implies that the right side of (2.16) is divergent, which implies that x(t) is a 1/f noise. On the other side, when x(t) is a 1/f noise, Sxx(0)=, which means that its ACF is nonintegrable, hence, LRD.

Since any random function with LRD is in the class of 1/f noise, one may observe other types of random functions that belong to 1/f noise from a view of LRD processes, for example, those described in .

Note 8.

As 1/f noise is of LRD, its ACF is nonintegrable over (-,). Thus, in (2.13), its correlation time τc. That implies that correlations at any time scale cannot be neglected. Consequently, the measure of correlation time fails to characterize the statistical dependence of 1/f noise.

4. Heavy-Tailed PDFs and <inline-formula><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M218"><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Noise

Heavy-tailed PDFs are widely observed in various fields of sciences and technologies, including life science and bioengineering; see, for example, . Typical heavy-tailed PDFs are the Pareto distribution, the log-Weibull distribution, the stretched exponential distribution, the Zipfian distribution, Lévy distribution, and the Cauchy distribution; see, for example [51, 96, 125, 143169], merely to cite a few.

By heavy tails, we mean that the tail of a PDF p(x) decays slower than the tails of PDFs in the form of exponential functions. More precisely, the term of heavy tail implies that p(x) of a random function x(t) decays slowly such that Cxx(τ) in (2.21), or rxx(τ) in (2.24), decays hyperbolically such that it is of LRD. Thus, we may have the theorem below.

Theorem 4.1.

Let x(t) be a heavy-tailed random function. Then, it is in the class of 1/f noise and vice versa.

Proof.

Considering that x(t) is heavy tailed, we may assume its ACF hyperbolically decays, that is, rxx(τ)~c|τ|-γ for τ and 0<γ<1. According to (3.3), therefore, we see that x(t) is 1/f noise. On the other side, if x(t) is a 1/f noise, it is LRD and accordingly heavy tailed [54, 146]. This completes the proof.

Note 9.

Theorem 4.1 may be taken as an answer to P3 stated in the Introduction. Since γ in Theorem 4.1 is restricted to (0, 1), Theorem 4.1 is consistent with the result of the Taqqiu’s law, referring [53, 54, 89] for the details of the Taqqiu’s law.

Note 10.

The tail of p(x) may be so heavy that the mean or variance of x(t) does not exist.

A commonly used instance to clarify Note 10 is the Pareto distribution; see, for example, [96, 134, 147, 148, 161]. To clarify it further, we would like to write more. Denote by pCauchy(x) the Cauchy distribution. Then, one has (4.1)pCauchy(x)=bπ[(x-m)2+b2], where b is the half width at half maximum and m is the statistical median . Its nth moment denoted by mn is computed by (4.2)mn=E[xn(t)]=-xnpCauchy(x)dx=Γ2π-xndx(x-m)2+(0.5Γ)2. Since the above integral is divergent for n1, the mean and variance of x(t) obeying pCauchy(x) do not exist.

Note 11.

Application of the Cauchy distribution to network traffic modeling refers to . The generalized Cauchy distribution is reported in .

Another type of heavy-tailed random functions without mean and variance is the Lévy distribution; see, for example, [162166, 174]. Suppose that x(t) follows the Lévy distribution that is denoted by pLevy(x). Then, pLevy(x) for xμ is given by (4.3)pLevy(x)=pLevy(x;μ,c)=c2πexp[-c/(2(x-μ))](x-μ)3/2, where μ is the location parameter and c the scale parameter. The nth moment of a Lévy distributed random function, for the simplicity by letting μ=0, is given by (4.4)mn=c2π0xnx-3/2e-c/(2x)dx. The integral in (4.4) is divergent for n>0. Thus, its mean and variance do not exist because they approach .

Note 12.

Application of the Lévy distribution to network traffic modeling is discussed in . Tools in Matlab for simulating Lévy distributed random data are described in .

The previously discussed heavy-tailed distributions, such as the Cauchy distribution and the Lévy distribution, are special cases of stable distributions, which are detailed in [89, 120, 176179]. Denote by pStable(x) the PDF of a stable-distributed random function x. Then, it is indirectly defined by its characteristic function denoted by φStable(t;μ,c,α,β). It is in the form (4.5)φStable(t;μ,c,α,β)=-pStable(x)ej2πxtdx=exp[jtμ-|ct|α(1-jβsgn(t)Φ)], where α(0,2] is the stability parameter, β[-1,1] is the skewness parameter, c(0,) is the scale parameter, μ(-,) the location parameter, and (4.6)Φ={tanπα2,ifα1-2πlog|t|,ifα=1. It may be easy to see that x has mean μ when α>1. However, its mean is undefined otherwise. In addition, its variance equals to 2c2 if α=2. Otherwise, its variance is infinite.

Note 13.

A stable distribution is characterized by 4 parameters. In general, the analytical expression of pStable(x) is unavailable except for some specific values of parameters, due to the difficulties in performing the inverse Fourier transform of the right side of (4.5).

Note 14.

A stable distribution is generally non-Gaussian except for some specific values of parameters. When α=2, it is Gaussian with the mean μ and the variance of 2c2. Generally speaking, pStable(x) is heavy tailed.

Note 15.

p Stable ( x ) reduces to the Landau distribution when α=β=1. Denote by Landau(μ,c) the Landau distribution . Then, its characteristic function is given by (4.7)φLandau(t;μ,c)=-pLandau(x)ej2πxtdx=exp[jtμ-|ct|(1-2jπlog(|t|))], where μ is the location parameter and c the scaled parameter. Its PDF is given by (4.8)pLandau(x)=1π0e-tlogt-xtsin(πt)dt. Applications of the Landau distribution can be found in nuclear physics [181, 182].

Note 16.

p Stable ( x ) reduces to the Holtsmark distribution if α=3/2 and β=0. Accordingly, (4.9)φHoltsmark(t;μ,c)=-pHoltsmark(x)ej2πxtdx=exp(jtμ-|ct|3/2). Its PDF is given by (4.10)pHoltsmark(x)=12π-exp(jtμ-|ct|3/2)e-j2πxtdt. This type of random functions has mean μ but its variance is infinite .

The literature regarding applications of stable distributions is rich. Their applications to network traffic modeling can also be found in .

It is worth noting that the observation of random functions without mean and variance may be traced back to the work of the famous statistician Daniel Bernoulli’s cousin, Nicolas Bernoulli in 1713 [189, 190]. Nicolas Bernoulli studied a casino game as follows. A player bets on how many tosses of a coin will be needed before it first turns up heads. If it falls heads on the first toss the player wins \$2; if it falls tails, heads, the player wins \$4; if it falls tails, tails, heads, the player wins \$8, and so on. According to this game rule, if the probability of an outcome is 2-k, the player wins \$2k. Thus, the mean for k is given by (4.11)k=12-k(\$2k)=. The above may be used to express the game that is now termed “Petersburg Paradox.” That paradox is now named after Daniel Bernoulli due to his presentation of the problem and his solution in the Commentaries of the Imperial Academy of Science of Saint Petersburg .

5. Fractionally Generalized Langevin Equation and <inline-formula><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M295"><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Noise

The standard Langevin equation is in the form (5.1)(ddt+λ)X(t)=w(t),X(0)=X0, where λ>0 [56, 192] and w(t) is a standard white noise. By standard white noise, we mean that its PSD Sww(f) is in the form (5.2)Sww(f)=1forf(-,). The solution to (5.1) in frequency domain is given by (5.3)SXX(f)=1λ2+(2πf)2.

The standard Langevin equation may not attract people much in the field of 1/f noise. People are usually interested in fractionally generalized Langevin equations. There are two types of fractionally generalized Langevin equations. One is in the form  (5.4)(d1+εdt1+ε+λ)X1(t)=w(t),ε>-1. The other is expressed by  (5.5)(ddt+λ)αX1(t)=w(t),α>0. Two are consistent when λ=0. We now adopt the one expressed by (5.5).

Theorem 5.1.

A solution to the stochastically fractional differential equation below belongs to 1/f noise: (5.6)dαdtαX1(t)=w(t),α>0.

Proof .

Denote by gX1(t) the impulse response function of (5.5). That is, (5.7)(ddt+λ)αgX1(t)=δ(t), where δ(t) is the Dirac-δ function defined by, for f(t) being continuous at t=0, (5.8)-δ(t)f(t)dt=f(0),δ(t)=0,t0. The function δ(t) is called the impulse function in linear systems [61, 216]. According to the theory of linear systems, gX1(t) is the solution to (5.7) under the zero initial condition, which is usually called the impulse response function in linear systems [61, 68, 69, 76, 77, 216222]. Denote by GX1X1(f) the Fourier transform of gX1(t). Then, with the techniques in fractional calculus [213, 215, 223], doing the Fourier transforms on (5.7) yields (5.9)GX1X1(f)=1(λ+j2πf)α. Therefore, we have, by taking into account (5.2), (5.10)SX1X1(f)=|GX1X1(f)|2Sww(f)=|GX1X1(f)|2=1[λ2+(2πf2)]α. If λ=0 in (5.10), we have 1/f noise expressed by (5.11)SX1X1(ω)=1(2πf)2α. This finishes the proof.

From the above, we see that X1(t) belongs to 1/f noise. As a matter of fact, by using fractional integral in (5.6), we have (5.12)X1(t)=d-αdt-αw(t),α>0.

The above expression implies that a 1/f noise may be taken as a solution to a stochastically fractional differential equation, being an answer to P4 described in the Introduction. The following example will soon refine this point of view.

Example 5.2.

Let B(t) be the Wiener Brownian motion for t(0,); see  for the details of the Brownian motion. Then, it is nondifferentiable in the domain of ordinary functions. It is differentiable, however, in the domain of generalized functions over the Schwartz space of test functions [91, 225]. Therefore, in the domain of generalized functions, we write the stationary Gaussian white noise by (5.13)w(t)=dB(t)dt. Based on the definitions of the fractional integrals of the Riemann-Liouville’s and the Weyl’s , on the one hand, when using the Riemann-Liouville integral operator, we express the fBm of the Riemann-Liouville type, which is denoted by BH,RL(t), in the form (5.14)BH,RL(t)=Dt-(H+1/2)0  dB(t)dt=1Γ(H+1/2)0t(t-u)H-1/2dB(u), where Dt-(H+1/2)0   is the Riemann-Liouville integral operator of order (0.5+H) for 0<H<1. On the other hand, the fBm of the Weyl type by using the Weyl fractional integral, which we denote by BH,Weyl(t), is given by (5.15)W-(H+1/2)dB(t)dt=BH,Weyl(t)-BH,Weyl(0)=1Γ(H+1/2){-0[(t-u)H-0.5-(-u)H-0.5]dB(u)+0t(t-u)H-0.5dB(u)}, where W-(H+1/2) is the Weyl integral operator of order (0.5+H). Expressions (5.14) and (5.15) are the fBms introduced by Mandelbrot and van Ness in  but we provide a new outlook of describing them from the point of view of the fractional generalized Langevin equation with the topic of 1/f noise.

6. Conclusions

We have explained the main properties of 1/f noise as follows. First, it is LRD and its ACF is hyperbolically decayed. Second, its PDF obeys power laws and it is heavy tailed. Finally, it may be taken as a solution to a stochastic differential equation. Fractal time series, such as fGn, fBm, the generalized Cauchy process, and the Lévy flights, α-stable processes, are generally in the class of 1/f noise.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the 973 Plan under the Project Grant no. 2011CB302800 and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the Project Grant nos. 61272402, 61070214, and 60873264.

Schottky W. Uber spontane Stromschwankungen in verschiedenen Elektri-zittsleitern Annalen der Physik 1918 362 23 541 567 10.1002/andp.19183622304 Schottky W. Zur Berechnung und Beurteilung des Schroteffektes Annalen der Physik 1922 373 10 157 176 10.1002/andp.19223731007 Johnson J. B. The Schottky effect in low frequency circuits Physical Review 1925 26 1 71 85 2-s2.0-0002432598 10.1103/PhysRev.26.71 Mandelbrot B. B. Multifractals and 1/f Noise 1998 New York, NY, USA Springer 1713511 ZBL1052.28500 Fraedrich K. Luksch U. Blender R. 1/f model for long-time memory of the ocean surface temperature Physical Review E 2004 70 3 4 2-s2.0-42749099260 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.037301 037301 Wagenmakers E. J. Farrell S. Ratcliff R. Estimation and interpretation of 1/fα noise in human cognition Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2004 11 4 579 615 2-s2.0-13844264730 10.3758/BF03196615 Principato F. Ferrante G. 1/f noise decomposition in random telegraph signals using the wavelet transform Physica A 2007 380 1-2 75 97 2-s2.0-34247882906 10.1016/j.physa.2007.02.111 Koverda V. P. Skokov V. N. Maximum entropy in a nonlinear system with a 1/f power spectrum Physica A 2012 391 1-2 21 28 10.1016/j.physa.2011.07.015 Nemirovsky Y. Corcos D. Brouk I. Nemirovsky A. Chaudhry S. 1/f noise in advanced CMOS transistors IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Magazine 2011 14 1 14 22 2-s2.0-79551636750 10.1109/MIM.2011.5704805 Miramontes O. Rohani P. Estimating 1/fα scaling exponents from short time-series Physica D 2002 166 3-4 147 154 2-s2.0-0037097990 10.1016/S0167-2789(02)00429-3 van Vliet C. M. Random walk and 1/f noise Physica A 2002 303 3-4 421 426 2-s2.0-0037081072 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00489-7 1917636 ZBL0983.60041 Kim J. S. Kim Y. S. Min H. S. Park Y. J. Theory of 1/f noise currents in semiconductor devices with one-dimensional geometry and its application to Si Schottky barrier diodes IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 2001 48 12 2875 2883 2-s2.0-0035694111 10.1109/16.974721 Antal T. Droz M. Györgyi G. Rácz Z. 1/f noise and extreme value statistics Physical Review Letters 2001 87 24 4 2-s2.0-0035842413 240601 Pilgram B. Kaplan D. T. A comparison of estimators for 1/f noise Physica D 1998 114 1-2 108 122 2-s2.0-22244479710 10.1016/S0167-2789(97)00188-7 Jensen H. J. Lattice gas as a model of 1/f noise Physical Review Letters 1990 64 26 3103 3106 2-s2.0-0001382179 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.3103 Marinari E. Parisi G. Ruelle D. Windey P. Random walk in a random environment and 1/f noise Physical Review Letters 1983 50 17 1223 1225 2-s2.0-0040982291 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1223 700324 Hooge F. N. 1/f noise Physica B 1976 83 1 14 23 2-s2.0-49349139058 10.1016/0378-4363(76)90089-9 Weissman M. B. Simple model for 1/f noise Physical Review Letters 1975 35 11 689 692 2-s2.0-23544452072 10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.689 Hooge F. N. Discussion of recent experiments on 1/f noise Physica 1972 60 1 130 144 2-s2.0-49649140939 10.1016/0031-8914(72)90226-1 Cattani C. Harmonic wavelet approximation of random, fractal and high frequency signals Telecommunication Systems 2010 43 3-4 207 217 2-s2.0-77950997359 10.1007/s11235-009-9208-3 Cattani C. On the existence of wavelet symmetries in archaea DNA Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2012 2012 21 10.1155/2012/673934 673934 2901044 ZBL1234.92014 Cattani C. Laserra E. Bochicchio I. Simplicial approach to fractal structures Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012 2012 21 10.1155/2012/958101 958101 2892233 Cattani C. Fractional calculus and Shannon wavelet Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012 2012 26 502812 10.1155/2012/502812 Cattani C. Pierro G. Altieri G. Entropy and multifractality for the mye-loma multiple TET 2 gene Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012 2012 14 193761 10.1155/2012/193761 Keshner M. S. 1/f noise Proceedings of the IEEE 1982 70 3 212 218 2-s2.0-0020102486 10.1109/PROC.1982.12282 Ninness B. Estimation of 1/f Noise IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1998 44 1 32 46 2-s2.0-0031672450 1486647 ZBL0905.94009 10.1109/18.650986 Yazici B. Kashyap R. L. A class of second-order stationary self-similar processes for 1/f phenomena IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1997 45 2 396 410 2-s2.0-0031075520 10.1109/78.554304 Wornell G. W. Wavelet-based representations for the 1/f family of fractal processes Proceedings of the IEEE 1993 81 10 1428 1450 2-s2.0-0027680633 10.1109/5.241506 Mandelbrot B. B. Some noises with 1/f spectrum, a bridge between direct current and white noise IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1967 13 2 289 298 10.1109/TIT.1967.1053992 ZBL0148.40507 Kasdin N. J. Discrete simulation of colored noise and stochastic processes and 1/fα power law noise generation Proceedings of the IEEE 1995 83 5 802 827 2-s2.0-0029304629 10.1109/5.381848 Corsini G. Saletti R. 1/fγ power spectrum noise sequence generator IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 1988 37 4 615 619 2-s2.0-0024123267 10.1109/19.9825 Li W. T. Holste D. Universal 1/f noise, crossovers of scaling exponents, and chromosome-specific patterns of guanine-cytosine content in DNA sequences of the human genome Physical Review E 2005 71 4 9 2-s2.0-37649027056 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.041910 041910 Li W. T. Stolovitzky G. Bernaola-Galván P. Oliver J. L. Compositional heterogeneity within, and uniformity between, DNA sequences of yeast chromosomes Genome Research 1998 8 9 916 928 2-s2.0-0031731186 Li W. T. Kaneko K. Long-range correlation and partial spectrum in a noncoding DNA sequence Europhysics Letters 1992 17 7 655 660 10.1209/0295-5075/17/7/014 Ivanov P. C. Nunes Amaral L. A. Goldberger A. L. Havlin S. Rosenblum M. G. Stanley H. E. Struzik Z. R. From 1/f noise to multifractal cascades in heartbeat dynamics Chaos 2001 11 3 641 652 2-s2.0-0035457767 10.1063/1.1395631 ZBL0990.92024 Mantegna R. N. Stanley H. E. An Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance 2000 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 2343447 Duan W. Q. Stanley H. E. Cross-correlation and the predictability of financial return series Physica A 2010 390 2 290 296 2-s2.0-78649330188 10.1016/j.physa.2010.09.013 Podobnik B. Horvatic D. Lam Ng A. Stanley H. E. Ivanov P. C. Modeling long-range cross-correlations in two-component ARFIMA and FIARCH processes Physica A 2008 387 15 3954 3959 2-s2.0-42649138578 10.1016/j.physa.2008.01.062 2586894 Aquino G. Bologna M. Grigolini P. West B. J. Beyond the death of linear response: 1/f optimal information transport Physical Review Letters 2010 105 4 4 040601 West B. J. Grigolini P. Chipping away at memory Biological Cybernetics 2010 103 2 167 174 2-s2.0-77955550836 10.1007/s00422-010-0394-6 2670405 West B. J. Shlesinger M. F. On the ubiquity of 1/f noise International Journal of Modern Physics B 1989 3 6 795 819 10.1142/S0217979289000609 1070444 Goldberger A. L. Bhargava V. West B. J. Mandell A. J. On the mechanism of cardiac electrical stability. The fractal hypothesis Biophysical Journal 1985 48 3 525 528 2-s2.0-0022005473 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83808-X Musha T. Takeuchi H. Inoue T. 1/f fluctuations in the spontaneous spike discharge intervals of a giant snail neuron IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1983 30 3 194 197 2-s2.0-0020641971 10.1109/TBME.1983.325109 Kobayashi M. Musha T. 1/f fluctuation of heartbeat period IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1982 29 6 456 457 2-s2.0-0019999725 10.1109/TBME.1982.324972 Neumcke B. 1/f noise in membranes Biophysics of Structure and Mechanism 1978 4 3 179 199 2-s2.0-0018190025 10.1007/BF02426084 Clay J. R. Shlesinger M. F. Unified theory of 1/f and conductance noise in nerve membrane Journal of Theoretical Biology 1977 66 4 763 773 2-s2.0-0017735658 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90244-2 Frehland E. Diffusion as a source of 1/f noise The Journal of Membrane Biology 1977 32 1 195 196 2-s2.0-34250288450 10.1007/BF01905217 Green M. E. Diffusion and 1/f noise The Journal of Membrane Biology 1976 28 1 181 186 2-s2.0-34250386387 10.1007/BF01869696 Csabai I. 1/f noise in computer network traffic Journal of Physics A 1994 27 12 L417 L421 2-s2.0-33847601316 10.1088/0305-4470/27/12/004 Takayasu M. Takayasu H. Sato T. Critical behaviors and 1/f noise in information traffic Physica A 1996 233 3-4 824 834 2-s2.0-0030407524 10.1016/S0378-4371(96)00189-6 Paxson V. Floyd S. Wide area traffic: the failure of Poisson modeling IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 1995 3 3 226 244 2-s2.0-0029323403 10.1109/90.392383 Willinger W. Govindan R. Jamin S. Paxson V. Shenker S. Scaling phenomena in the internet: critically examining criticality Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002 99 supplement 1 2573 2580 2-s2.0-0037133194 10.1073/pnas.012583099 Loiseau P. Gonçalves P. Dewaele G. Borgnat P. Abry P. Primet P. V. B. Investigating self-similarity and heavy-tailed distributions on a large-scale experimental facility IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 2010 18 4 1261 1274 2-s2.0-77955772505 10.1109/TNET.2010.2042726 Abry P. Borgnat P. Ricciato F. Scherrer A. Veitch D. Revisiting an old friend: on the observability of the relation between long range dependence and heavy tail Telecommunication Systems 2010 43 3-4 147 165 2-s2.0-77951022891 10.1007/s11235-009-9205-6 Yaglom A. M. Correlation Theory of Stationary and Related Random Functions 1987 1 New York, NY, USA Springer Papoulis A. Pillai S. U. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes 1997 New York, NY, USA McGraw-Hill 836136 Lindgren B. W. McElrath G. W. Introduction to Probability and Statistics 1959 New York, NY, USA The Macmillan 0193697 Doob J. L. The elementary Gaussian processes Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1944 15 229 282 0010931 10.1214/aoms/1177731234 ZBL0060.28907 Kolmogorov A. N. Fundamental of Probability 1954 Shanghai, China Business Press Translated from Russian by S.-T. Ding Box G. E. P. Jenkins G. M. Reinsel G. C. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control 1994 Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA Prentice Hall 1312604 Bendat J. S. Piersol A. G. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedure 2000 3rd Hoboken, NJ, USA John Wiley & Sons Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics 2839170 Fuller W. A. Introduction to Statistical Time Series 1996 2nd New York, NY, USA John Wiley & Sons Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: Probability and Statistics 1365746 Beran J. Statistics for Long-Memory Processes 1994 61 New York, NY, USA Chapman & Hall Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 1304490 Beran J. Statistical methods for data with long-range dependence Statistical Science 1992 7 4 404 416 10.1214/ss/1177011122 Monin A. S. Yaglom A. M. Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence 1971 2 Cambridge, Mass, USA MIT Press Kolmogorov A. N. Local structure of turbulence in an incompressible viscous fluid at very high Reynolds numbers Soviet Physics Uspekhi 1968 10 6 734 736 10.1070/PU1968v010n06ABEH003710 Nigam N. C. Introduction to Random Vibrations 1983 Cambridge, Mass, USA MIT Press Song T. T. Grigoriu M. Random Vibration of Mechanical and Structural Systems 1993 New York, NY, USA Prentice Hall Harris C. M. Shock and Vibration Handbook 1995 4th New York, NY, USA McGraw-Hill Czichos H. Saito T. Smith L. Springer Handbook of Metrology and Testing 2011 New York, NY, USA Springer Sharpe W. N. Jr. Springer Handbook of Experimental Solid Mechanics 2008 New York, NY, USA Springer Tropea C. Yarin A. L. Foss J. F. Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2007 New York, NY, USA Springer Grote K. H. Antonsson E. K. Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering 2009 New York, NY, USA Springer Kramme R. Hoffmann K. P. Pozos R. S. Springer Handbook of Medical Technology 2012 New York, NY, USA Springer Kresse W. Danko D. M. Springer Handbook of Geographic Information 2012 New York, NY, USA Springer Bhattacharyya S. S. Deprettere F. Leupers R. Takala J. Handbook of Signal Processing Systems 2010 New York, NY, USA Springer Mitra S. K. Kaiser J. F. Handbook for Digital Signal Processing 1993 New York, NY, USA John Wiley & Sons Woyczyński W. A. A First Course in Statistics for Signal Analysis 2006 Boston, Mass, USA Birkhäuser 2278806 Bailey R. A. Design of Comparative Experiments 2008 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics 10.1017/CBO9780511611483 2422352 ASME Measurement Uncertainty Part 1, Instruments and Apparatus 1986 New York, NY, USA ASME Sup-plement to ASME, Performance Test Codes Sheskin D. Statistical Tests and Experimental Design: A Guidebook 1984 New York, NY, USA Gardner Press MacFarland T. W. Two-Way Analysis of Variance 2012 New York, NY, USA Springer Gupta A. K. Zeng W. B. Wu Y. Probability and Statistical Models: Foundations for Problems in Reliability and Financial Mathematics 2010 Boston, Mass, USA Birkhäuser 10.1007/978-0-8176-4987-6 2680605 Fieguth P. Statistical Image Processing and Multidimensional Modeling 2011 New York, NY, USA Springer Information Science and Statistics 10.1007/978-1-4419-7294-1 2744200 Nauta J. Statistics in Clinical Vaccine Trials 2011 New York, NY, USA Springer Gelman A. Analysis of variance—why it is more important than ever The Annals of Statistics 2005 33 1 1 53 10.1214/009053604000001048 2157795 ZBL1064.62082 Pendse C. G. A note on mathematical expectation The Mathematical Gazette 1938 22 251 399 402 Mandelbrot B. B. Gaussian Self-Affinity and Fractals 2001 New York, NY, USA Springer 1878884 Samorodnitsky G. Taqqu M. S. Stable Non-Gaussian Random Processes 1994 New York, NY, USA Chapman & Hall Stochastic Modeling 1280932 Beran J. Sherman R. Taqqu M. S. Willinger W. Long-range dependence in variable-bit-rate video traffic IEEE Transactions on Communications 1995 43 234 1566 1579 2-s2.0-0029253909 10.1109/26.380206 Gelfand I. M. Vilenkin K. Generalized Functions 1964 1 New York, NY, USA Academic Press Li M. Lim S. C. Power spectrum of generalized Cauchy process Telecommunication Systems 2010 43 3-4 219 222 2-s2.0-77951025628 10.1007/s11235-009-9209-2 Li M. Lim S. C. A rigorous derivation of power spectrum of fractional Gaussian noise Fluctuation and Noise Letters 2006 6 4 C33 C36 10.1142/S0219477506003604 2288731 Mandelbrot B. B. van Ness J. W. Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications SIAM Review 1968 10 422 437 0242239 10.1137/1010093 ZBL0179.47801 Flandrin P. On the spectrum of fractional Brownian motions IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1989 35 1 197 199 10.1109/18.42195 995341 Li M. Fractal time series—a tutorial review Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2010 2010 26 157264 10.1155/2010/157264 2570932 ZBL1191.37002 Muniandy S. V. Lim S. C. Modeling of locally self-similar processes using multifractional Brownian motion of Riemann-Liouville type Physical Review E 2001 63 4 7 046104 2-s2.0-4243216985 Sithi V. M. Lim S. C. On the spectra of Riemann-Liouville fractional Brownian motion Journal of Physics A 1995 28 11 2995 3003 1344103 10.1088/0305-4470/28/11/005 ZBL0828.60099 Lim S. C. Muniandy S. V. On some possible generalizations of fractional Brownian motion Physics Letters A 2000 266 2-3 140 145 10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00034-7 1741314 ZBL1068.82518 Chilès J. P. Delfiner P. Geostatistics, Modeling Spatial Uncertainty 1999 New York, NY, USA John Wiley & Sons Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: Applied Probability and Statistics 10.1002/9780470316993 1679557 Li M. Cattani C. Chen S. Y. Viewing sea level by a one-dimensional random function with long memory Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2011 2011 13 2-s2.0-78650735978 10.1155/2011/654284 654284 Lim S. C. Li M. A generalized Cauchy process and its application to relaxation phenomena Journal of Physics A 2006 39 12 2935 2951 2-s2.0-33644902936 10.1088/0305-4470/39/12/005 2212065 ZBL1090.82013 Lim S. C. Teo L. P. Gaussian fields and Gaussian sheets with generalized Cauchy covariance structure Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 2009 119 4 1325 1356 2-s2.0-62149130808 10.1016/j.spa.2008.06.011 2508576 ZBL1161.60314 Li M. Lim S. C. Modeling network traffic using generalized Cauchy process Physica A 2008 387 11 2584 2594 2-s2.0-39649123983 10.1016/j.physa.2008.01.026 Vengadesh P. Muniandy S. V. Majid W. H. A. Fractal morphological analysis of bacteriorhodopsin (bR) layers deposited onto indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes Materials Science and Engineering C 2009 29 5 1621 1626 2-s2.0-67349145013 10.1016/j.msec.2008.12.027 Martin R. J. Walker A. M. A power-law model and other models for long-range dependence Journal of Applied Probability 1997 34 3 657 670 2-s2.0-0031221012 1464601 10.2307/3215092 ZBL0882.62085 Martin R. J. Eccleston J. A. A new model for slowly-decaying correlations Statistics and Probability Letters 1992 13 2 139 145 2-s2.0-38249015274 10.1016/0167-7152(92)90088-M 1158850 ZBL0752.60031 Woodward W. A. Cheng Q. C. Gray H. L. A k-factor GARMA long-memory model Journal of Time Series Analysis 1998 19 4 485 504 2-s2.0-0000834229 10.1111/j.1467-9892.1998.00105.x 1650550 Ma C. Power-law correlations and other models with long-range dependence on a lattice Journal of Applied Probability 2003 40 3 690 703 2-s2.0-0242424972 10.1239/jap/1059060896 1993261 ZBL1041.60046 Ma C. A class of stationary random fields with a simple correlation structure Journal of Multivariate Analysis 2005 94 2 313 327 2-s2.0-18644364947 10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.007 2167917 ZBL1070.62084 Li M. Jia W. Zhao W. Correlation form of timestamp increment sequences of self-similar traffic on Ethernet Electronics Letters 2000 36 19 1668 1669 2-s2.0-0034648575 10.1049/el:20001183 Li M. Zhao W. Quantitatively investigating locally weak stationarity of modified multifractional Gaussian noise Physica A 2012 391 24 6268 6278 10.1016/j.physa.2012.07.043 Tsionas E. G. Estimating multivariate heavy tails and principal directions easily, with an application to international exchange rates Statistics and Probability Letters 2012 82 11 1986 1989 10.1016/j.spl.2012.06.030 Lin J. Second order asymptotics for ruin probabilities in a renewal risk model with heavy-tailed claims Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 2012 51 2 422 429 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2012.07.001 Yu K. Huang M. L. Brill P. H. An algorithm for fitting heavy-tailed distributions via generalized hyperexponentials INFORMS Journal on Computing 2012 24 1 42 52 10.1287/ijoc.1100.0443 2903303 Luger R. Finite-sample bootstrap inference in GARCH models with heavy-tailed innovations Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2012 56 11 3198 3211 10.1016/j.csda.2011.08.008 Ishihara T. Omori Y. Efficient Bayesian estimation of a multivariate stochastic volatility model with cross leverage and heavy-tailed errors Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2010 2-s2.0-77955343938 10.1016/j.csda.2010.07.015 Diebolt J. Gardes L. Girard S. Guillou A. Bias-reduced extreme quantile estimators of Weibull tail-distributions Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2008 138 5 1389 1401 2-s2.0-38349019581 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.04.025 2925962 Beran J. Das B. Schell D. On robust tail index estimation for linear long-memory processes Journal of Time Series Analysis 2012 33 3 406 423 10.1111/j.1467-9892.2011.00774.x 2915093 Barbe P. McCormick W. P. Heavy-traffic approximations for fractionally integrated random walks in the domain of attraction of a non-Gaussian stable distribution Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 2012 122 4 1276 1303 10.1016/j.spa.2012.01.008 2914753 Weng C. Zhang Y. Characterization of multivariate heavy-tailed distribution families via copula Journal of Multivariate Analysis 2012 106 178 186 10.1016/j.jmva.2011.12.001 2887687 ZBL1236.62048 García C. B. García Pérez J. van Dorp J. R. Modeling heavy-tailed, skewed and peaked uncertainty phenomena with bounded support Statistical Methods and Applications 2011 20 4 146 166 10.1007/s10260-011-0173-0 2859781 ZBL1238.62012 Lachos V. H. Angolini T. Abanto-Valle C. A. On estimation and local influence analysis for measurement errors models under heavy-tailed distributions Statistical Papers 2011 52 3 567 590 2-s2.0-79960587496 10.1007/s00362-009-0270-4 2821058 Ganti V. Straub K. M. Foufoula-Georgiou E. Paola C. Space-time dynamics of depositional systems: experimental evidence and theoretical modeling of heavy-tailed statistics Journal of Geophysical Research F: Earth Surface 2011 116 2 17 2-s2.0-79957459938 10.1029/2010JF001893 F02011 Dixit U. J. Nooghabi M. J. Efficient estimation in the Pareto distribution with the presence of outliers Statistical Methodology 2011 8 4 340 355 2-s2.0-79955588716 10.1016/j.stamet.2011.01.011 2800355 ZBL1215.62021 Nándori P. Recurrence properties of a special type of heavy-tailed random walk Journal of Statistical Physics 2011 142 2 342 355 2-s2.0-79251645450 10.1007/s10955-010-0116-4 2764129 ZBL1223.60021 Ceresetti D. Molinié G. Creutin J. D. Scaling properties of heavy rainfall at short duration: a regional analysis Water Resources Research 2010 46 9 12 2-s2.0-77957708493 10.1029/2009WR008603 W09531 Charpentier A. Oulidi A. Beta kernel quantile estimators of heavy-tailed loss distributions Statistics and Computing 2010 20 1 35 55 2-s2.0-73549105721 10.1007/s11222-009-9114-2 2578075 Embrechts P. Nešlehová J. Wüthrich M. V. Additivity properties for Value-at-Risk under Archimedean dependence and heavy-tailedness Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 2009 44 2 164 169 2-s2.0-63449119587 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2008.08.001 2517882 ZBL1163.91431 Alves I. F. de Haan L. Neves C. A test procedure for detecting super-heavy tails Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2009 139 2 213 227 2-s2.0-55149085459 10.1016/j.jspi.2008.04.026 2473999 ZBL1149.62036 Beirlant J. Joossens E. Segers J. Second-order refined peaks-over-threshold modelling for heavy-tailed distributions Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2009 139 8 2800 2815 2-s2.0-67349251218 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.01.006 2523668 ZBL1162.62044 Ibragimov R. Heavy-tailedness and threshold sex determination Statistics and Probability Letters 2008 78 16 2804 2810 2-s2.0-53249136512 10.1016/j.spl.2008.03.029 2465125 ZBL1154.62084 Delgado R. A reflected fBm limit for fluid models with ON/OFF sources under heavy traffic Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 2007 117 2 188 201 2-s2.0-33947151983 10.1016/j.spa.2006.07.001 2290192 ZBL1108.60074 Taqqu M. S. The modelling of ethernet data and of signals that are heavy-tailed with infinite variance Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 2002 29 2 273 295 2-s2.0-0036014592 10.1111/1467-9469.00283 1909787 ZBL1020.60082 Lindsay B. G. Kettenring J. Siegmund D. O. A report on the future of statistics Statistical Science 2004 19 3 387 413 2-s2.0-16244394091 10.1214/088342304000000404 2185624 ZBL1100.62516 Resnick S. On the foundations of multivariate heavy-tail analysis Journal of Applied Probability 2004 41 191 212 2-s2.0-33845792425 2057574 ZBL1049.62056 Resnick S. Rootzén H. Self-similar communication models and very heavy tails The Annals of Applied Probability 2000 10 3 753 778 2-s2.0-0034346706 1789979 ZBL1083.60521 Cai J. Tang Q. On max-sum equivalence and convolution closure of heavy-tailed distributions and their applications Journal of Applied Probability 2004 41 1 117 130 2-s2.0-2442513460 10.1239/jap/1077134672 2036276 Limic V. A LIFO queue in heavy traffic The Annals of Applied Probability 2001 11 2 301 331 2-s2.0-0035538465 1843048 ZBL1015.60079 Le H. 'Hagan A. O. A class of bivariate heavy-tailed distributions San-Khyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B 1998 60 1 82 100 1717077 ZBL0972.62017 Bryson M. C. Heavy-tailed distributions: properties and tests Technometrics 1974 16 1 61 68 2-s2.0-0016029488 10.1080/00401706.1974.10489150 ZBL0337.62065 Beran J. Discussion: heavy tail modeling and teletraffic data The Annals of Statistics 1997 25 5 1852 1856 2-s2.0-0008729852 10.1214/aos/1069362376 1474072 ZBL0942.62097 Ahn S. Kim J. H. T. Ramaswami V. A new class of models for heavy tailed distributions in finance and insurance risk Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 2012 51 1 43 52 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2012.02.002 2909139 Pisarenko V. Rodkin M. Heavy-Tailed Distributions in Disaster Analysis 2010 New York, NY, USA Springer Resnick S. I. Heavy-Tail Phenomena Probabilistic and Statistical Modeling 2007 New York, NY, USA Springer Probabilistic and statistical modeling 2271424 Adler R. J. Feldman R. E. Taqqu M. S. A Practical Guide to Heavy Tails: Statistical Techniques and Applications, 1998 Boston, Mass, USA Birkhäuser 1652283 Li M. Zhao W. Visiting power laws in cyber-physical networking systems Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012 2012 13 302786 10.1155/2012/302786 Xu L. Ivanov P. C. Hu K. Chen Z. Carbone A. Stanley H. E. Quantifying signals with power-law correlations: a comparative study of detrended fluctuation analysis and detrended moving average techniques Physical Review E 2005 71 5 14 2-s2.0-26944462286 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.051101 051101 Li M. Li J. Y. On the predictability of long-range dependent series Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2010 2010 9 2-s2.0-77953522545 10.1155/2010/397454 397454 Hürlimann W. From the general affine transform family to a Pareto type IV model Journal of Probability and Statistics 2009 2009 10 364901 10.1155/2009/364901 André A. Limit theorems for randomly selected adjacent order statistics from a Pareto distribution International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 2005 2005 21 3427 3441 2-s2.0-33746720859 10.1155/IJMMS.2005.3427 2206865 ZBL1087.60020 Stanley H. E. Power laws and universality Nature 1995 378 6557 554 2-s2.0-0000674229 Eliazar I. Klafter J. A probabilistic walk up power laws Physics Reports 2012 511 3 143 175 10.1016/j.physrep.2011.11.001 2881447 Bansal A. R. Gabriel G. Dimri V. P. Power law distribution of susceptibility and density and its relation to seismic properties: an example from the German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) Journal of Applied Geophysics 2010 72 2 123 128 2-s2.0-77957751585 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.08.001 Milojević S. Power law distributions in information science: making the case for logarithmic binning Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010 61 12 2417 2425 2-s2.0-78449269076 10.1002/asi.21426 Wu Y. Ye Q. Xiao J. Li L. X. Modeling and statistical properties of human view and reply behavior in on-line society Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012 2012 7 969087 10.1155/2012/969087 Fujihara A. Uchida M. Miwa H. Universal power laws in the threshold network model: a theoretical analysis based on extreme value theory Physica A 2010 389 5 1124 1130 2-s2.0-71649115202 10.1016/j.physa.2009.11.002 Saiz A. Boltzmann power laws Physica A 2010 389 2 225 236 2-s2.0-70349733390 10.1016/j.physa.2009.09.032 2556293 Jaishankar A. McKinley G. H. Power-law rheology in the bulk and at the interface: quasi-properties and fractional constitutive equations Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 2013 469 2149 20120284 10.1098/rspa.2012.0284 Zhao X. Shang P. J. Pang Y. L. Power law and stretched exponential effects of extreme events in Chinese stock markets Fluctuation and Noise Letters 2010 9 2 203 217 2-s2.0-77952793458 10.1142/S0219477510000162 Kokoszka P. Mikosch T. The integrated periodogram for long-memory processes with finite or infinite variance Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 1997 66 1 55 78 2-s2.0-0031065859 1431870 ZBL0885.62108 10.1016/S0304-4149(96)00124-X Belomestny D. Spectral estimation of the Lévy density in partially observed affine models Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 2011 121 6 1217 1244 2-s2.0-79955623370 10.1016/j.spa.2011.02.001 2794974 ZBL1216.62132 Simon T. Fonctions de Mittag-Leffler et processus de Lévy stables sans sauts négatifs Expositiones Mathematicae 2010 28 3 290 298 2-s2.0-77952760252 10.1016/j.exmath.2009.12.002 2671005 ZBL1194.33022 Lambiotte R. Brenig L. Truncated Lévy distributions in an inelastic gas Physics Letters A 2005 345 4–6 309 313 2-s2.0-24344459004 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.07.030 Terdik G. Woyczynski W. A. Piryatinska A. Fractional- and integer-order moments, and multiscaling for smoothly truncated Lévy flights Physics Letters A 2006 348 3–6 94 109 2-s2.0-29144506035 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.08.083 Koponen I. Analytic approach to the problem of convergence of truncated Lévy flights towards the Gaussian stochastic process Physical Review E 1995 52 1 1197 1199 2-s2.0-0000644312 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.1197 Behboodian J. Jamalizadeh A. Balakrishnan N. A new class of skew-Cauchydistributions Statistics and Probability Letters 2006 76 14 1488 1493 2-s2.0-33745210365 10.1016/j.spl.2006.03.008 2245569 ZBL1096.60011 Garbaczewski P. Cauchy flights in confining potentials Physica A 2010 389 5 936 944 2-s2.0-71649102630 10.1016/j.physa.2009.11.021 Field A. J. Harder U. Harrison P. G. Measurement and modelling of self-similar traffic in computer networks IEE Proceedings-Communications 2004 151 4 355 363 10.1049/ip-com:20040368 Korn G. A. Korn T. M. Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers 1961 New York, NY, USA McGraw-Hill Konno H. Tamura Y. A generalized Cauchy process having cubic non-linearity Reports on Mathematical Physics 2011 67 2 179 195 10.1016/S0034-4877(11)00011-5 2840337 ZBL1235.62122 Konno H. Watanabe F. Maximum likelihood estimators for generalized Cauchy processes Journal of Mathematical Physics 2007 48 10 19 2-s2.0-36148948315 10.1063/1.2800162 103303 2362792 ZBL1152.81516 Lubashevsky I. A. Truncated Lévy flights and generalized Cauchy processes European Physical Journal B 2011 82 2 189 195 2-s2.0-79960323256 10.1140/epjb/e2011-20262-3 2826597 Liang Y. Chen W. A survey on computing Lévy stable distributions and a new MATLAB toolbox Signal Processing 2013 93 1 244 251 10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.07.035 Terdik G. Gyires T. Lévy flights and fractal modeling of internet traffic IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 2009 17 1 120 129 2-s2.0-61449179215 10.1109/TNET.2008.925630 Kuruoǧlu E. E. Density parameter estimation of skewed α-stable distributions IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2001 49 10 2192 2201 2-s2.0-0035485846 10.1109/78.950775 1875819 Petropulu A. P. Pesquet J. C. Yang X. Yin J. J. Power-law shot noise and its relationship to long-memory α-stable processes IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2000 48 7 1883 1892 2-s2.0-0033704831 1824639 10.1109/78.847775 Cohen S. Samorodnitsky G. Random rewards, fractional brownian local times and stable self-similar processes The Annals of Applied Probability 2006 16 3 1442 1461 2-s2.0-33750509599 10.1214/105051606000000277 2260069 ZBL1133.60016 Shao M. Nikias C. L. Signal processing with fractional lower order moments: stable processes and their applications Proceedings of the IEEE 1993 81 7 986 1010 2-s2.0-0027624516 10.1109/5.231338 Landau L. On the energy loss of fast particles by ionization Journal of Physics 1944 8 201 205 Wilkinson D. H. Ionization energy loss by charged particles part I. The Landau distribution Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 1996 383 2-3 513 515 2-s2.0-0030401861 10.1016/S0168-9002(96)00774-7 Tabata T. Ito R. Approximations to Landau's distribution functions for the ionization energy loss of fast electrons Nuclear Instruments and Methods 1979 158 521 523 2-s2.0-0001765597 10.1016/S0029-554X(79)95440-5 Holtsmark J. Uber die Verbreiterung von Spektrallinien Annalen der Physik 1919 363 7 577 630 10.1002/andp.19193630702 Pittel B. Woyczynski W. A. Mann J. A. Random tree-type partitions as a model for acyclic polymerization: holtsmark (3/2-stable) distribution of the supercritical gel The Annals of Probability 1990 18 1 319 341 1043950 10.1214/aop/1176990951 ZBL0743.60110 Hummer D. G. Rational approximations for the holtsmark distribution, its cumulative and derivative Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 1986 36 1 1 5 2-s2.0-0041631050 10.1016/0022-4073(86)90011-7 Garroppo R. G. Giordano S. Pagano M. Procissi G. Testing α-stable processes in capturing the queuing behavior of broadband teletraffic Signal Processing 2002 82 12 1861 1872 2-s2.0-0036887827 10.1016/S0165-1684(02)00316-X Gallardo J. R. Makrakis D. Orozco-Barbosa L. Use of α-stable self-similar stochastic processes for modeling traffic in broadband networks Performance Evaluation 2000 40 1 71 98 2-s2.0-0033901856 10.1016/S0166-5316(99)00070-X Karasaridis A. Hatzinakos D. Network heavy traffic modeling using α-stable self-similar processes IEEE Transactions on Communications 2001 49 7 1203 1214 2-s2.0-0035390907 10.1109/26.935161 de Montmort P. R. Essay d'analyse sur les jeux de hazard 1713 de Montmort P. R. Essay d'analyse sur les jeux de hazard American Mathematical Society, 1980 Bernoulli D. Exposi-tion of a new theory on the measurement of risk Econometrica 1954 22 1 22 36 Coffey W. T. Kalmykov Y. P. Waldron J. T. The Langevin Equation 2004 2nd Singapore World Scientific 2053912 Kwok S. F. Langevin equation with multiplicative white noise: transfor-mation of diffusion processes into the Wiener process in different prescrip-tions Annals of Physics 2012 327 8 1989 1997 10.1016/j.aop.2012.04.008 Medino A. V. Lopes S. R. C. Morgado R. Dorea C. C. Y. Generalized Langevin equation driven by Lévy processes: a probabilistic, numerical and time series based approach Physica A 2012 391 3 572 581 10.1016/j.physa.2011.09.025 Panja D. Generalized langevin equation formulation for anomalous polymer dynamics Journal of Statistical Mechanics 2010 2010 2 2-s2.0-77149178393 10.1088/1742-5468/2010/02/L02001 L02001 Bazzani A. Bassi G. Turchetti G. Diffusion and memory effects for stochastic processes and fractional Langevin equations Physica A 2003 324 3-4 530 550 2-s2.0-0038147098 10.1016/S0378-4371(03)00073-6 1982904 ZBL1050.82029 Lutz E. Fractional Langevin equation Physical Review E 2001 64 5 4 051106 2-s2.0-0035509430 McPhie M. G. Daivis P. J. Snook I. K. Ennis J. Evans D. J. Generalized Langevin equation for nonequilibrium systems Physica A 2001 299 3-4 412 426 2-s2.0-0035888006 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00328-4 ZBL0972.82060 Fa K. S. Fractional Langevin equation and Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative European Physical Journal E 2007 24 2 139 143 2-s2.0-36749074902 10.1140/epje/i2007-10224-2 Ahmad B. Nieto J. J. Alsaedi A. El-Shahed M. A study of nonlinear Langevin equation involving two fractional orders in different intervals Non-Linear Analysis: Real World Applications 2012 13 2 599 606 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.07.052 2846866 ZBL1238.34008 Ahmad B. Nieto J. J. Solvability of nonlinear Langevin equation involving two fractional orders with Dirichlet boundary conditions International Journal of Differential Equations 2010 2012 10 649486 10.1155/2010/649486 2575288 ZBL1207.34007 Kou S. C. Xie X. S. Generalized langevin equation with fractional gaussian noise: subdiffusion within a single protein molecule Physical Review Letters 2004 93 18 4 180603 2-s2.0-19744382497 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.180603 Fogedby H. C. Langevin equations for continuous time Lévy flights Physical Review E 1994 50 2 1657 1660 2-s2.0-4244190920 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.1657 Fukui Y. Morita T. Derivation of the stationary generalized Langevin equation Journal of Physics A 1971 4 4 477 490 2-s2.0-36149062182 10.1088/0305-4470/4/4/011 0428987 10.1088/0305-4470/4/4/011 Kou S. C. Stochastic modeling in nanoscale biophysics: subdiffusion within proteins The Annals of Applied Statistics 2008 2 2 501 535 10.1214/07-AOAS149 2524344 Anh V. V. Heyde C. C. Leonenko N. N. Dynamic models of long-memory processes driven by Lévy noise Journal of Applied Probability 2002 39 4 730 747 2-s2.0-0037001043 10.1239/jap/1037816015 1938167 ZBL1016.60039 Achar B. N. N. Hanneken J. W. Clarke T. Damping characteristics of a fractional oscillator Physica A 2004 339 3-4 311 319 2-s2.0-2942532686 10.1016/j.physa.2004.03.030 2091376 Achar B. N. N. Hanneken J. W. Clarke T. Response characteristics of a fractional oscillator Physica A 2002 309 3-4 275 288 2-s2.0-0037097306 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00609-X ZBL0995.70017 Eab C. H. Lim S. C. Fractional generalized Langevin equation approach to single-file diffusion Physica A 2010 389 13 2510 2521 2-s2.0-77951086281 10.1016/j.physa.2010.02.041 Eab C. H. Lim S. C. Fractional Langevin equations of distributed order Physical Review E 2011 83 3 10 2-s2.0-79961097638 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.031136 031136 2788233 Lim S. C. Teo L. P. Modeling single-file diffusion with step fractional Brownian motion and a generalized fractional Langevin equation Journal of Statistical Mechanics 2009 2009 8 2-s2.0-70449409239 10.1088/1742-5468/2009/08/P08015 P08015 Lim S. C. Ming L. Teo L. P. Locally self-similar fractional oscillator processes Fluctuation and Noise Letters 2007 7 2 L169 L179 2-s2.0-34547313503 10.1142/S0219477507003817 Li M. Lim S. C. Chen S. Exact solution of impulse response to a class of fractional oscillators and its stability Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2011 2011 9 2-s2.0-79251547368 10.1155/2011/657839 657839 ZBL1202.34018 Lim S. C. Eab C. H. Mak K. H. Li M. Chen S. Solving linear coupled fractional differential equations and their applications Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012 2012 28 653939 10.1155/2012/653939 Lim S. C. Li M. Teo L. P. Langevin equation with two fractional orders Physics Letters A 2008 372 42 6309 6320 2-s2.0-52349118652 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.08.045 2462401 ZBL1225.82049 Gabel R. A. Roberts R. A. Signals and Linear Systems 1973 New York, NY, USA John Wiley & Sons Carlini M. Honorati T. Castellucci S. Photovoltaic greenhouses: comparison of optical and thermal behaviour for energy savings Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012 2012 10 743764 10.1155/2012/743764 Carlini M. Castellucci S. Modelling the vertical heat exchanger in thermal basin Proceedings of the ICCSA, 2011, Part 4 2011 6785 New York, NY, USA Springer 277 286 Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science Carlini M. Cattani C. Tucci A. Optical modelling of square solar con-centrator Proceedins of the ICCSA, 2011, Part 4 2011 6785 New York, NY, USA Springer 287 295 Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science Qiu L. Xu B. G. Li S. B. H2/H control of networked control system with random time delays Science China Information Sciences 2011 54 12 2615 2630 10.1007/s11432-011-4463-9 2871102 Li J. Wang J. Z. Wang S. K. Ma L. L. Shen W. Dynamic image stabilization precision test system based on the Hessian matrix Science China Information Sciences 2012 55 9 2056 2074 10.1007/s11432-011-4290-z Zhao W. X. Chen H. F. Markov chain approach to identifying Wiener systems Science China Information Sciences 2012 55 5 1201 1217 10.1007/s11432-012-4582-y 2924629 ZBL1245.93134 Miller K. S. Ross B. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations 1993 NewYork, NY, USA John Wiley & sons 1219954 Hida T. Brownian Motion 1980 New York, NY, USA Springer 562914 Zemanian A. H. An introduction to generalized functions and the generalized Laplace and Legendre transformations SIAM Review 1968 10 1 1 24 10.1137/1010001 ZBL0177.40905