Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 610926, 10 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/610926

Research Article

Existence of Positive Solutions of One-Dimensional Prescribed Mean Curvature Equation

Ruyun Ma and Lingfang Jiang

Department of Mathematics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received 23 October 2013; Accepted 28 February 2014; Published 13 April 2014

Academic Editor: Yuji Liu

Copyright © 2014 Ruyun Ma and Lingfang Jiang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

We consider the existence of positive solutions of one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation , , , , where is a parameter, and is continuous. Further, when satisfies , , we obtain the exact number of positive solutions. The main results are based upon quadrature method.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

In this paper, we are interested in the existence of positive solution of one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation

where is a parameter and satisfies , .

The existence of positive solutions of such type of prescribed mean curvature equations both in one and in higher dimension has been discussed in the last decades by several authors (see Habets and Omari [1, 2], Li and Liu [3], Pan [4], Obersnel and Omari [5, 6], and others [7–12]) in connection with various configurations of nonlinearities.

Habets and Omari [1] considered the case that the nonlinearity ; they proved that if , then there exist and with such that (1) has exactly one positive solution for , exactly two solutions for , and no positive solution for ; if , then there exists with such that (1) has exactly one positive solution for and no positive solution for ; if , then there exist and such that (1) has no positive solution for and exactly one positive solution for .

Li and Liu [3] studied the case that the nonlinearity , ; they proved that if , then (1) has at most one solution for any ; there exist such that (1) has no positive solution for and exactly one positive solution for ; if , then (1) has at most two solutions for any ; there exists such that (1) has exactly one positive solution for and no positive solution for .

Inspired by [1, 3], we naturally consider (1) with nonlinearity satisfying

Denote , .

Consider the following assumptions:

(H1) is continuous, and , ;(H2), for , ;(H3)for fixed , for ;(H4)for fixed , , .

We will prove the following.

Theorem 1. Assume that (H1)–(H3) hold, and, if , then the following conclusions hold:

(1)for any , (1) has at most one solution;(2)there exists such that (1) has no solution for and has exactly one solution for .

Theorem 2. Assume that (H1), (H2), and (H4) hold, and, if  , then the following conclusions hold:

(1)for any , (1) has at most two solutions;(2)there exists such that (1) has exactly one solution for and has no solution for .

Remark 3. If and , then (2) reduces to , which has been considered by Habets and Omari [1]; for and , which has been studied by Li and Liu [3], and the case has been considered by Zhang and Feng [7].

Remark 4. The problem concerning exact number of solutions of semilinear equation

has been discussed by several authors with and the related problems (see [13–16]).

2. Quadrature Technique

Let be a solution of problem (1); then it is well known that takes its maximum at , is symmetric with respect to , for , and for . Hence, problem (1) is equivalent to the following problem defined on :

Let . If is a solution of (4) with , then is a solution of the following problem defined on :

From satisfying

and , we see that

Therefore,

Then

Integrating (9) from to leads to

By substituting in (7), we get that and .

Let be defined on by

For simplicity, we denote

It follows that

Lemma 5. has continuous derivatives up to the second order on with respect to and

Proof. From Habets and Omari [1], it is easy to obtain the results.

Lemma 6. Let (H1) and (H2) hold; is strictly decreasing on with respect to , and

Proof. Since

we have

Then

It follows that , .

From the fact that , we have , and ; it follows from the assumption (H1) that

Then is strictly decreasing on .

Lemma 7. Let (H1)–(H3) hold, if and . Then has the following properties:

(i); (ii); (iii), for .

Proof . (i) From (H2),

therefore,

Hence, from , then .

(ii) Since , for , thus

(iii) From Lemma 5, we know that , so

where .

From the assumption (H3), we have that , ; thus .

Lemma 8. Assume that (H1) and (H2) hold, and let . Then has the following properties:

(i)for , is continuous in ;(ii)for , , .

Proof. (i) Applying , we may prove the following (26), (29) and (30) hold. For simplicity, we denote by .

If , then , , and from , we get

So

Since , we have from (25) that

If , then , and , , and, from the fact that , we get that if , then

And, if , then

therefore,

Or

It follows from (26), (29), and (30); we get that is continuous in and (i) holds. (ii) From (25) and the fact that , the following holds.

If , then

thus, if , then

from (31), we obtain

If , then for and for , and, from the fact that , we get the following.

If , then

and, if , then

Then

It follows from (26), (29), (33), (36), and Lemma 6 that and .

Lemma 9. Let (H1), (H2), and (H4) hold; assume that . Then has the following properties, for fixed

(i);(ii);(iii); (iv), for .

Proof. (i) Since , we choose ; thus from (H2), we get

therefore,

Hence, from , we have .

(ii) From Lemma 5, we have that

according to the assumption (H2), we have

and, from the assumption (H4), that is, , , we have ; thus

Thus

Therefore, .

(iii) It is proved in the same way as in Lemma 7(ii).

(iv) From Lemma 5, we get that

From (H1) where , using the assumption (H4) and the fact that , we arrive at

Therefore, , for .

Lemma 10. Assume that . Denote . Then

(i) is strictly decreasing in ;(ii) is continuous in ;(iii), .

Proof. (i) From Lemma 9, we get

Let . From the definition of and Lemma 6, we obtain

And, for and ,

It follows that, for ,

thus,

Hence, , which implies that is strictly decreasing in .

(ii) Let . Since , there exists such that, for and ,

It follows that , for , . Further,

Define

Thus, if , then

and, if , then

It follows that the singular integral in (53) and (54) converges uniformly in , and hence and are continuous in . By (i), we have

We will see that the equalities hold in (55). If this does not hold, then we may assume, for instance,

Choose an increasing sequence satisfying and then choose such that

Since , we may assume that there exists such that ; by the continuity of and , we have

or

which contradicts (56). Therefore, . Similarly, we have . So is continuous at .

(iii) Note that , for any , , and , and, from (55), we have

Hence, .

Fix and . For , the definition of and the fact that imply .

Since ,

Hence, .

3. The Proofs of the Main Results

Proof of Theorem 1. Similar to the proof of Theorem 1.1 [3], it follows from Lemmas 7 and 8 that the results are easy to prove.

Proof of Theorem 2. Similar to the proof of Theorem 1.2 [3], it follows from Lemmas 8, 9, and 10 that the results are easy to prove.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the NSFC (no. 11361054), the SRFDP (no. 20126203110004), and the Gansu Provincial National Science Foundation of China (no. 1208RJZA258).

References

P. Habets and P. Omari, “Multiple positive solutions of a one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature problem,” Communications in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 701–730, 2007.

P. Habets and P. Omari, “Positive solutions of an indefinite prescribed mean curvature problem on a general domain,” Advanced Nonlinear Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2004.

W. Li and Z. Liu, “Exact number of solutions of a prescribed mean curvature equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 367, no. 2, pp. 486–498, 2010.

H. Pan, “One-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation with exponential nonlinearity,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 999–1010, 2009.

F. Obersnel and P. Omari, “Existence and multiplicity results for the prescribed mean curvature equation via lower and upper solutions,” Differential Integral Equations, vol. 22, pp. 853–880, 2009.

F. Obersnel and P. Omari, “Positive solutions of the Dirichlet problem for the prescribed mean curvature equation,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 249, no. 7, pp. 1674–1725, 2010.

X. Zhang and M. Feng, “Exact number of solutions of a one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation with concave-convex nonlinearities,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 395, pp. 493–402, 2012.

P. Korman and Y. Li, “Global solution curves for a class of quasilinear boundary-value problems,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh A: Mathematics, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1197–1215, 2010.

P. Korman, “Uniqueness and exact multiplicity of solutions for a class of Dirichlet problems,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 244, no. 10, pp. 2602–2613, 2008.

P. Benevieri, J. M. DoÓ, and E. S. de Medeiros, “Periodic solutions for nonlinear systems with mean curvature-like operators,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1462–1475, 2006.

D. Bonheure, P. Habets, F. Obersnel, and P. Omari, “Classical and non-classical solutions of a prescribed curvature equation,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 243, no. 2, pp. 208–237, 2007.

V. K. Le, “Variational method based on finite dimensional approximation in a generalized prescribed mean curvature problem,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 246, no. 9, pp. 3559–3578, 2009.

A. Ambrosetti, H. Brezis, and G. Cerami, “Combined effects of concave and convex nonlinearities in some elliptic problems,” Journal of Functional Analysis, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 519–543, 1994.

M. Tang, “Exact multiplicity for semilinear elliptic Dirichlet problems involving concave and convex nonlinearities,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh A, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 705–717, 2003.

Z. Liu, “Exact number of solutions of a class of two-point boundary value problems involving concave and convex nonlinearities,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 181–197, 2001.

S. H. Wang and T. S. Yeh, “On the exact structure of positive solutions of an Ambrosetti-Brezis-Cerami problem and its generalization in one space variable,” Differential Integral Equations, vol. 17, pp. 17–44, 2004.