MPE Mathematical Problems in Engineering 1563-5147 1024-123X Hindawi Publishing Corporation 10.1155/2015/582326 582326 Research Article Element for Beam Dynamic Analysis Based on Analytical Deflection Trial Function Cao Qiongqiong 1 Ding Min 1 Jiang Xiugen 1 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0206-904X Ju Jinsan 1 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9702-3134 Wang Hongzhi 1 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-9888 Zhang Peng 1, 2 Li Chenfeng 1 College of Water Resources & Civil Engineering China Agricultural University Beijing 100083 China cau.edu.cn 2 China Aerospace Construction Group Co., Ltd. Beijing 100071 China aerospace-construction.com 2015 1952015 2015 18 09 2014 15 12 2014 1952015 2015 Copyright © 2015 Qiongqiong Cao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

For beam dynamic finite element analysis, according to differential equation of motion of beam with distributed mass, general analytical solution of displacement equation for the beam vibration is obtained. By applying displacement element construction principle, the general solution of displacement equation is conversed to the mode expressed by beam end displacements. And taking the mode as displacement trial function, element stiffness matrix and element mass matrix for beam flexural vibration and axial vibration are established, respectively, by applying principle of minimum potential energy. After accurate integral, explicit form of element matrix is obtained. The comparison results show that the series of relative error between the solution of analytical trial function element and theoretical solution is about 1×10-9 and the accuracy and efficiency are superior to that of interpolation trial function element. The reason is that interpolation trial function cannot accurately simulate the displacement mode of vibrating beam. The accuracy of dynamic stiffness matrix method is almost identical with that of analytical trial function. But the application of dynamic stiffness matrix method in engineering is limited. The beam dynamic element obtained in this paper is analytical and accurate and can be applied in practice.

1. Introduction

Dynamic structural analysis is essential in structure engineering design. It is especially important for large-scale structure in earthquake area, such as high-rise buildings, dam, hydropower station, oil pipelines, and gas pipelines. Dynamic problem of beam structure is common in engineering. Vibration happens at beam under earthquake, gas-liquid flows, and impact. Resonance occurs when frequency of external load is close to natural frequency of structure. It is a great threat for structure safety. Therefore, perfecting accuracy and efficiency of dynamic structural analysis is to ensure structure safety and reliability.

A large number of theories and methods for dynamic structural analysis have been suggested. The analysis methods include direct solving method, energy method, and numerical method. Clough and Penzien  have obtained analytical solution of displacement equation for flexural vibrating beam and presented the first three-order vibration mode and the corresponding frequency of cantilever beam and simply supported beam. Jin  provided analytical solution of Timoshenko beam clamped two ends and subjected to uniformly distributed load according to different jump condition. Guo et al.  established structure element property matrix by energy principle considering flexural and torsional deformation of T-beam, and the effect of bridge local member (such as diaphragm plate). Fang and Wang  attained beam natural vibration frequency by analyzing dynamic property of external prestressing beam using energy method, and the solution has a better match with numerical solution. Lou and Hong  derived the approximation analysis technique for dynamic characteristics of the prestressed beam by applying the mode perturbation method. Carrer et al.  analyzed the dynamic behavior of Timoshenko beam by using boundary element method. Wu  analyzed the dynamic behavior of two-dimension frame with stiffening bar randomly distributed by using elastic-rigid composite beam element. De Rosa et al.  studied the dynamic behavior of slender beam with concentrated mass at beam end, and numerical solution of frequency equation was obtained. Among them, numerical analysis represented by finite element is the main and efficient method for dynamic analysis (such as natural vibration analysis and forced vibration analysis). Finite element method was firstly proposed by Clough  in an article about plane elastic problem, and it is perfect in theory as a numerical method.

At present, the methods of constructing dynamic element for beam include dynamic stiffness matrix method, Galerkin method, Ritz method, energy variation method. Dynamic stiffness matrix can accurately solve differential equation of motion according to initial displacement field without any assumption, and then accurate results can be obtained irrespective of element number. This method was proposed by Koloušek . To gain more accurate results, stiffness matrix of tensile torsion bar and Euler beam about frequency, that is, dynamic stiffness matrix, was firstly derived from analytical solution for studying vibration characteristics of plane truss. A lot of work on the research and development of dynamic stiffness matrix method was also done by Long and Bao , Hashemi and Richard , Chen et al. , Banerjee et al. , and Banerjee et al. . Shavezipur and Hashemi  put forward an accurate finite element method. In this method, closed form solution of differential equation of beam not coupling flexural vibration torsional vibration was obtained by merging Galerkin weighted residual method and dynamic stiffness matrix (DSM). Result of dynamic stiffness matrix is more accurate, but analytical solution of differential equation cannot be derived when structure load or displacement boundary condition is too complex. Then dynamic stiffness matrix method is not suitable any more. According to principle of virtual displacement, a large number of research achievements on dynamic analysis of thin-walled open section beam, elastic foundation beam, and composite beam have been conducted by Chopra , Hu and Dai , Wang et al. , Hashemi and Richard , and Pagani et al. . Nabi and Ganesan  put forward a finite element method based on free vibration analysis theory of composite beam with the first order shear deformation. Zhao and Chen  developed the dynamic analysis of a unified stochastic variational principle and the corresponding stochastic finite element method via the instantaneous minimum potential energy principle and the small parameter perturbation technique. On the basis of energy variation principle, Wang et al.  derived governing differential equation and natural boundary condition of dynamic response for I-shaped beam and obtained closed solution of the corresponding generalized dynamic displacement.

Accuracy and efficiency of beam element depend on beam displacement trial function by applying potential energy variation principle to constructing beam displacement element. For current beam element, cubic polynomial displacement mode is used to obtain a series of static and dynamic element widely applied to the software, such as ANSYS and NASTRAN. For dynamic analysis, vibrating beam displacement mode has a big difference from polynomial mode. Precision requirements cannot be met by taking polynomial function as vibrating beam displacement trail function. The basic analytical solution is used as the element trial function in analytical trial function method. Discrete finite element method takes advantage of analytical solution. It embodies the superiority of trial function using basic analytical solution.

This paper focuses on constructing element for beam dynamic analysis using analytical deflection trail function based on variational method of principle of minimum potential energy and displacement element construction theory. The fruits are useful to beam dynamic analysis.

2. Displacement Trial Function for Beam Element

Selecting displacement trial function is one of the main contents of constructing displacement element. Appropriate displacement trial function should be in accordance with element deformation behavior and should be easy for integral of element energy functional. Element accuracy is determined by the accuracy of displacement trial function. The corresponding functional integral has a direct effect on element calculation efficiency and accuracy.

With regard to beam element, displacement mode based on interpolation function is used for element displacement trial function of all kinds of problems. Linear polynomial Lagrange interpolation function meeting the continuity condition at C0 is used for axial displacement. Cubic polynomial Hermit interpolation function meeting the continuity condition at C1 is used for flexural deformation.

Take flexural deformation, for example; for the static problems of uniform cross section beam subjected to uniform distributed load, EI(d4wx/dx4)=q is stiffness equilibrium equation about deflection w(x). Here, EI is beam section flexural stiffness and q is the uniform distributed load. The accurate solution of this equation is a cubic polynomial. Cubic polynomial Hermit interpolation function meeting the continuity condition of beam end displacement is actual displacement of element. And the corresponding potential energy functional has analytic, derivable, integrable solution. For this reason, static beam element derived from Hermit interpolation shape function is accurate element.

However, for dynamic and nonlinear straight beam and every nonlinear beam, deflection equation is not cubic polynomial due to the change of equilibrium differential equation mode. Therefore, element constructed by Hermit interpolation trial function is an approximate element. The key of constructing accurate element for all kinds of problems of beam is to search analytical trial function having functional integrability.

3. Analytical Trial Function of Displacement for Vibrating Beam Element

The method to construct analytical trial function of displacement for vibrating beam element is as follows:

to deduce the general solution of displacement equation for beam vibration containing undetermined parameters according to differential equation of equilibrium for beam vibration;

to determine the undetermined parameters in displacement equation according to displacement condition of vibrating beam end;

to write out displacement equation for beam vibration expressed by beam end displacement, and then to obtain displacement trial function for vibrating beam.

To construct beam dynamic element, local coordinate as shown in Figure 1 is established. It is in accordance with general beam element. The positive direction of linear displacement of beam end and force is in accordance with coordinate direction, and the positive direction of rotation angle and moment is in accordance with clockwise direction.

Coordinate system and parameter positive direction.

3.1. Governing Equation for Beam Free Vibration and Displacement General Solution 3.1.1. Beam Flexural Vibration Equation

Dynamic equilibrium governing equation for beam flexural vibration is expressed as (1)EI4vx,tx4+m-2vx,tt2=0.

In (1), vx,t is the displacement response for beam flexural vibration.

By applying the method of separation of variables, analytical solution of deflection equation for beam flexural vibration is obtained :(2)ϕwx=C1sinαx+C2cosαx+C3shαx+C4chαx.

In (2), flexural vibration parameter α is connected with circular frequency for beam flexural vibration ωw, ωw=α2EI/m-, EI is beam section flexural stiffness, and m- is beam mass per unit length.

3.1.2. Beam Axial Vibration Equation

Dynamic equilibrium governing equation for beam axial vibration is expressed as (3)EAd2udx2-m-2ut2=0.

In (3), ux,t is the displacement response for beam axial vibration.

By applying the method of separation of variables, analytical solution of deflection equation for beam axial vibration is obtained :(4)ϕux=D1cosβx+D2sinβx.

In (4), axial vibration parameter β is connected with circular frequency for beam axial vibration ωu, ωu=βEA/m-, and EA is beam section tensile (compressive) rigidity.

3.2. Analytical Trial Function of Displacement for Dynamic Beam Element 3.2.1. Analytical Trial Function for Beam Flexural Vibration

(1) Parameter Determination of Displacement Function. Equation (2) can be further expressed as(5)ϕwx=i=14φixCi=φC,where (6)C=C1C2C3C4T,φ=φ1xφ2xφ3xφ4x=sinαxcosαxshαxchαx.

Beam end displacement is defined as δwe=ω1θ1ω2θ2T.

According to (5), beam end displacement becomes(7)δwe=φ10φ20φ30φ40-φ10-φ20-φ30-φ40φ1lφ2lφ3lφ4l-φ1l-φ2l-φ3l-φ4l·C1C2C3C4=AC.

If λ=αl, with (6), [A] can be expressed as(8)A=0101-α0-α0sinλcosλshλchλ-αcosλαsinλ-αchλ-αshλ.

With (7), undetermined parameter of displacement function is expressed as(9)C=A-1δwe.

To perform matrix inversion, then(10)A-1=c11c12c13c14c21c22c23c24c31c32c33c34c41c42c43c44,where(11)c11=-c31=cosλsinhλ+coshλsinλS,c12=-cosλcoshλ+sinhλsinλ-1αS,c13=-c33=-sinλ+sinhλS,c14=-c34=-coshλ-cosλαS,c21=1-sinhλsinλ+cosλcoshλS,c22=-c42=coshλsinλ-cosλsinhλS,c23=-c43=coshλ-cosλS,c24=-c44=sinhλ-sinλαS,c32=1+sinhλsinλ-cosλcoshλαS,c41=cosλcoshλ+sinλsinhλ-1S,S=2cosλcoshλ-1.

(2) Element Displacement Shape Function. By substituting (9) into (5), displacement function for element flexural vibration expressed by beam end displacement can be obtained: (12)ϕwx=φA-1δwe.

If (13)Nw=φA-1,

(12) becomes(14)ϕwx=Nwδwe.

N w is flexural vibration displacement trial function for dynamic beam element. With (13), it can be expressed as(15)Nw=φA-1=N1N2N3N4,where N1, N2, N3, and N4 are deflection shape functions. After matrix operation, they can be expressed as(16)N1=1Ssinhλsinαx-λ+coshλcosαx-λhhhhi-cosαx+cosλcoshαx-λhhhhi-sinλsinhαx-λ-coshαx,N2=1αS-coshλsinαx-λ-sinhλcosαx-λhhhhhi+sinαx+sinhαx-sinλcoshαx-λhhhhhi-cosλsinhαx-λ,N3=1S-sinαxsinhλ-cosαx-λhhhhi+cosαxcoshλ-coshαx-λhhhhi+sinλsinhαx+coshαxcosλ,N4=1αS-sinαxcoshλ+sinαx-λhhhhhi+cosαxsinhλ+sinhαx-λhhhhhi-sinhαxcosλ+coshαxsinλ.

3.2.2. Analytical Trial Function for Beam Axial Vibration

(1) Parameter Determination of Displacement Function. Equation (4) can be further expressed as(17)ϕux=i=14ψixDi=ψD,where(18)D=D1D2T,ψ=ψ1xψ2x=cosβxsinβx.

Beam end axial displacement is defined as δue=u1u2T.

According to (17), beam end axial displacement is obtained:(19)δue=ψ10ψ20ψ1lψ2lD1D2=BD.

If γ=βl, with (18), [B] can be expressed as(20)B=10cosγsinγ.

With (19), undetermined parameter of axial displacement function is expressed as(21)D=B-1δue.

To perform matrix inversion, then(22)B-1=10-cosγsinγ1sinγ.

(2) Element Displacement Shape Function. By substituting (21) into (17), the following can be obtained:(23)ϕux=ψB-1δue.

If (24)Nu=ψB-1,

(23) becomes(25)ϕux=Nuδue.

N u is axial vibration displacement trial function for dynamic beam element. With (23), it can be expressed as(26)Nu=ψB-1=N5N6,where N5, N6 are axial vibration displacement shape functions. After matrix operation, they can be expressed as(27)N5=cosβx-sinβxcosγsinγ,N6=sinβxsinγ.

4. Element Potential Energy Functional and Variation

Finite element formulation of dynamic beam element is constructed by principle of minimum potential energy and analytical trial function.

4.1. Potential Energy Functional

In the light of potential energy, functional of total potential energy is given by(28)p=U+V=120lEAϕu2xdx+120lEIϕw′′2xdx-120lm-ωu2ϕu2xdx-120lm-ωw2ϕw2xdx,where U is element strain energy and V is potential energy of inertia force.

With element displacement, the following can be obtained:(29)p=120lEAδueTNuTNuδuedx+120lEIδweTNw′′TNw′′δwedx-120lm-ωu2δueTNuTNuδuedx-120lm-ωw2δweTNwTNwδwedx.

4.2. Functional Variation and Transformation

In the light of principle of minimum potential energy, that is, p/δe=0, element equilibrium equation is obtained:(30)Keδe-ω2Meδe=0,where Ke and Me are dynamic stiffness matrix and mass matrix of beam element, respectively:(31)Ke=0lEANuTNudx+0lEINw′′TNw′′dx,Mwe=0lm-NuTNudx+0lm-NwTNwdx.

5. Element Matrix

Flexural vibration and axial vibration are independent of one another irrespective of large deformation. Element matrixes at flexural vibration and axial vibration are obtained by applying variation on flexural vibration displacement and axial vibration displacement, respectively.

5.1. Element Matrix for Beam Flexural Vibration 5.1.1. Stiffness Matrix

After matrix operation, element dynamic stiffness matrix for beam flexural vibration is expressed as(32)Kwe=Hkw11kw12kw13kw14kw21kw22kw23kw24kw31kw32kw33kw34kw41kw42kw43kw44,where(33)kwij=1H0lNwi′′Nwi′′dx,H=EIα3e-2λG,G=161+cos2λch2λ-2cosλchλ.

After integral, each stiffness matrix coefficient can be obtained, such as(34)kw11=coshλsinλ+cosλsinλ-sinhλcoshλ-2cosh2λsinλcosλhi-2cosh2λsinλcosλ·2e2λ+e4λ+1+4eλ-e3λcoshλsinhλsinλ+coshλcosλ-21+e4λcosλsinλcoshλsinhλ+4e2λcos2λλ-sinhλcoshλ+6e2λ+e4λ+1cosλsinhλ+1-e4λ-8e2λλcosλcoshλ+4eλ+e3λ·cosλsinhλcoshλ-cos2λsinhλ-sinλhh+cosh2λsinλ-cos2λcoshλ+4λe2λ+e4λ-1cosh2λ+1-e4λsinλsinhλ.

5.1.2. Mass Matrix

Mass matrix of element for beam flexural vibration is given by(35)Mw=Pmw11mw12mw13mw14mw21mw22mw23mw24mw31mw32mw33mw34mw41mw42mw43mw44,where(36)mwij=1P0lNwiNwjdx,P=m-e-2λG,G=161+cos2λch2λ-2cosλchλ.

After integral, each mass matrix coefficient can be obtained, such as(37)mw11=α-14eλ+e3λhhhh·cos2λsinhλ-cosλsinhλcoshλhhhhhhh-sinλcosh2λ+sinλhhhh+4λe2λ+e4λ-1cosh2λhhhh+1-e4λsinλhhhh·sinhλ-2cosλsinhλcoshλhhhh+e4λ-10e2λ+1cosλsinhλhhhh-8λe2λ+e4λ-1cosλcoshλhhhh+4e3λ-eλhhhh·coshλsinλsinhλ-cos2λ+4cosλcoshλhhhh+2e2λ+eλ+1sinλcosλ-sinhλcoshλhhhh+3e2λcos2λ4sinhλcoshλ+λhhhh+26e2λ-1-e4λsinλcosλcosh2λhhhh+e4λ-14e2λ+1sinλcoshλ.

5.2. Element Matrix for Beam Axial Vibration

After matrix operation, element dynamic stiffness matrix for beam axial vibration is expressed as(38)Kue=EAc-cosγsinγ+γ2cos2γ-1γcosγ+sinγ2cos2γ-1γcosγ+sinγ2cos2γ-1-cosγsinγ+γ2cos2γ-1.

Mass matrix of element for beam axial vibration is given by(39)Mu=m-sinγcosγ-γ2ccos2γ-1γcosγ-sinγ2ccos2γ-1γcosγ-sinγ2ccos2γ-1sinγcosγ-γ2ccos2γ-1.

5.3. Dynamic Beam Element Matrix

Because of the independence of axial vibration and flexural vibration, 6 by 6 matrix is obtained by adding two rows and two columns to the above 4 by 4 matrix considering axial vibration without coupling of axial vibration and flexural vibration. It is element stiffness matrix.

Element stiffness matrix is given by(40)Ke=k1100k1400k22k230k25k26k330k35k36k4400symmetryk55k56k66,where(41)k11=-EAccosγsinγ+γ2cos2γ-1,k14=EAcγcosγ+sinγ2cos2γ-1,k22=Hkw11,k23=Hkw12,k25=Hkw13,k26=Hkw14,k33=Hkw22,k35=Hkw23,k36=Hkw24,k44=-EAccosγsinγ+γ2cos2γ-1,k55=Hkw33,k56=Hkw34,k66=Hkw44.

Element mass matrix is given by(42)Me=m1100m1400m22m230m25m26m330m35m36m4400symmetrym55m56m66,where(43)m11=m-sinγcosγ-γ2ccos2γ-1,m14=m-γcosγ-sinγ2ccos2γ-1,m22=Pmw11,m23=Pmw12m25=Pmw13,m26=Pmw14,m33=Pmw22,m35=Pmw23,m36=Pmw24,m44=m-sinγcosγ-γ2ccos2γ-1,m55=Pmw33,m56=Pmw34,m66=Pmw44.

6. Example and Comparison

To verify the dynamic beam element constructed by analytical trial function method, the comparisons between the calculation results of this element, general beam element, and theoretical solution are conducted.

6.1. Calculation Model

(1) Four Kinds of Typical Beams. Free vibration of four kinds of typical beams are analyzed, including cantilever beam, simply supported beam, one end clamped and another simply supported beam, and clamped-clamped beam.

(2) Structure and Material Parameters. The parameters of calculation model are as follows: beam dimension is 6 m × 0.2 m × 0.3 m, material elastic modulus E=210 GPa, Poisson’s ratio υ=0.3, and material density ρ=7800 kg/m3.

(3) Theoretical Solution. According to theoretical equation of free vibration for distributed mass beam, base frequencies of free vibration for all kinds of beam are obtained by using analytic method .

(4) Dynamic Stiffness Matrix Method. According to governing equation of free vibration for distributed mass beam, stiffness coefficient  of beam vibration is provided, and then base frequencies of free vibration for all kinds of beam are obtained.

(5) Finite Element Model of General Beam Element. By using the software ANSYS, finite element model of beam vibration is established and modal analysis is conducted. Element BEAM3 is used to simulate beam. BEAM3 is general two-dimension elastic beam element and uniaxial element bearing tension, pressure, and bend. Every node has three degrees of freedom, that is, x-axis linear displacement, y-axis linear displacement, and z-axis angular displacement. Cubic polynomial interpolating function is used as its displacement trial function. Beam is divided into one beam element. Block Lanczos method is used for modal extraction.

(6) Model in This Paper. Equilibrium equation of beam flexural free vibration is given by(44)KωΔt+MωΔ¨t=0,where Kω is structure stiffness matrix with boundary displacement restraint and Mω is structure mass matrix with boundary displacement restraint. According to natural vibration governing equation of beam, beam natural vibration is harmonic vibration. The following assumption can be obtained:(45)Δt=Ysinωt.

Substituting (45) into (44) yields(46)M-1ωKωY=ω2Y.

Assuming η=ω2, then Eη=M-1ηKη.

The following equation can be obtained:(47)EηY=ηY.

Beam natural vibration analysis is converted to eigenvalue and eigenvector analysis of matrix Eη=M-1ηKη.

Iteration method is used to calculate base frequency of beam vibration. Through circular calculations, the iteration stops when frequency relative error reaches κy=(ωi+1-ωi)/ωi<10-8.

6.2. Result Comparison and Analysis 6.2.1. Element Accuracy

Vibration analysis is conducted by dividing beam into one element. Table 1 shows base frequency of beam free vibration and the relative error between calculated solution and theoretical solution.

Base frequency of beam free vibration and its comparison (rad/s).

Beam type Theoretical solution Dynamic stiffness matrix method Interpolation trial function element Analytical trial function element
Absolute value Relative error (%) Absolute value Relative error (%) Absolute value Relative error (%)
Cantilever beam 43.8875389 43.8875390 2.89 E - 07 44.0740 0.423 43.8875391 3.1 2 E - 07
Simply supported beam 123.1941891 123.1941888 - 8 . 5 9 E - 08 136.5902 10.874 123.1941889 - 6 . 3 7 E - 08
One end clamped and another simply supported beam 192.4528355 192.4528348 - 1.50 E - 07 255.4366 32.727 192.4528349 - 1.5 3 E - 07
Clamped-clamped beam 279.2673996 279.2673991 - 1.32 E - 07 283.4156 1.485 279.2673992 - 1.2 7 E - 07

Note: calculation of eigenvalue and eigenvector cannot be conducted due to all DOFs of two ends of clamped-clamped beam being restrained. If the beam is divided into one element, semistructure is used for vibration simulation of clamped-clamped beam.

As shown in Table 1, the following results can be obtained.

( 1 ) By applying analytical trial function element to the analysis, a more accurate solution can be attained when the relative error is less than 10−8. The series of relative error between this solution and theoretical solution is about 1 × 10−9. It can be supposed that this error is calculation error of iteration efficiency.

( 2 ) By applying interpolation trial function element to the analysis, the maximum relative error between the solution and theoretical solution reaches 30%. It indicates that dynamic beam element constructed by taking polynomial function as displacement trial function has bigger error.

( 3 ) The solution of dynamic stiffness matrix method  is close to theoretical solution. The relative error is almost identical with that calculated by analytical trial function method. The reason is that their displacement curves for vibrating beam are both derived from dynamic equilibrium governing equation. Element load value and node balance condition need to be analyzed in dynamic stiffness matrix method. Dynamic stiffness matrix of beam element can be directly obtained in analytical trial function method. The latter is more simple and intuitive and widely applied.

6.2.2. Element Efficiency

The beam is divided into 1 element, 2 elements, 10 elements, and 20 elements, respectively. Beam vibration numerical simulation is conducted by applying interpolation trial function method. The relative error of calculated base frequency of free vibration for every typical beam and theoretical solution is obtained. Table 2 presents the results.

Comparison of different element results (relative error, %).

Beam type Element number for analytical trial function Element number for interpolation trial function
1 1 2 10 20
Cantilever beam 3.1 2 E - 07 0.4249 −0.0003 −0.0489 −0.0489
Simply supported beam - 6 . 3 7 E - 08 10.8739 0.2909 −0.1018 −0.1018
One end clamped and another simply supported beam - 1.5 3 E - 07 32.7269 0.8037 −0.1169 −0.1202
Clamped-clamped beam - 1.2 7 E - 07 1.4854 1.4854 −0.1255 −0.1278

As shown in Table 2, the result of interpolation trial function is closer to theoretical solution with the increasing of element number. But it is obvious that base frequency becomes smaller and its difference with theoretical solution is larger. The reason is that the more the elements are, the lower the structure calculation stiffness is. The greater the difference between the actual stiffness and calculation stiffness. Then the calculated base frequency further has large difference with theoretical solution. It indicates that actual deformation curve for vibrating beam is not polynomial, and polynomial function cannot be taken as displacement trial function for vibrating beam.

7. Conclusions

Based on the results of this investigation, the following conclusions can be drawn.

( 1 ) The result of interpolation trial function element for simulating beam vibration is not in accordance with theoretical solution, and the relative error is larger. With element number increasing, base frequency becomes smaller and has large difference with theoretical solution. It indicates that vibrating beam displacement mode is different from polynomial mode, and the precision requirement cannot be met by taking polynomial function as displacement trial function for vibrating beam.

( 2 ) The solution of dynamic stiffness matrix method for simulating beam vibration is close to theoretical solution. But, in this method, element load value and node balance condition need to be specially analyzed, and it is not easy to derive nonstructural question. Its application in engineering is limited.

( 3 ) Dynamic stiffness matrix of beam element is obtained by applying analytical trial function put forward in this paper. Base frequencies of four typical beams are attained by analyzing eigenvalue and eigenvector and are compared with theoretical solution. The results show that the series of relative error is about 1 × 10−9, and it is actually calculation error of iteration efficiency. The dynamic beam element in the light of analytical trial function put forward in this paper is high-precision element.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by National Natural Science Funds no. 51279206, Beijing Natural Science Foundation no. 3144029, Chinese Universities Scientific Fund no. 2011JS126, and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China no. 20110008120017.

Clough A. K. Penzien J. Dynamic of Structures 1995 New York, NY, USA McGraw-Hill Jin Q. An analytical solution of dynamic response for the rigid perfectly plastic Timoshenko beam Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 1984 16 5 504 511 Guo X. Chen H. Zeng Q. Dynamic characteristics analysis model of prestressed concrete T-type beam Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics 2000 17 2 176 183 Fang D.-P. Wang Q.-F. Dynamic behavior analysis of an externally prestressed beam with energy method Journal of Vibration and Shock 2012 31 1 177 181 2-s2.0-84863045100 Lou M. Hong T. Analytical approach for dynamic characteristics of prestressed beam with external tendons Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science 2006 34 10 1284 1288 2-s2.0-33846068205 Carrer J. A. Fleischfresser S. A. Garcia L. F. Mansur W. J. Dynamic analysis of Timoshenko beams by the boundary element method Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 2013 37 12 1602 1616 10.1016/j.enganabound.2013.08.007 MR3124867 2-s2.0-84886644469 Wu J.-J. Use of the elastic-and-rigid-combined beam element for dynamic analysis of a two-dimensional frame with arbitrarily distributed rigid beam segments Applied Mathematical Modelling: Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems 2011 35 3 1240 1251 10.1016/j.apm.2010.09.001 MR2740865 2-s2.0-78549273351 De Rosa M. A. Franciosi C. Maurizi M. J. On the dynamic behaviour of slender beams with elastic ends carrying a concentrated mass Computers and Structures 1996 58 6 1145 1159 10.1016/0045-7949(95)00199-9 2-s2.0-0030105043 Clough R. W. The finite element method in plane stress analysis Proceedings of the 2nd ASCE Conference on Electronic Computation 1960 Pittsburgh, Pa, USA Koloušek V. Anwendung des Gesetzes der virtuellen Ver schiebungen and des in der Reziprozitatssatzes Stab weks Dynamik Lngenieur Archiv 1941 12 363 370 Long Y.-Q. Bao S.-H. Structural Mechanics II 1996 2nd Beijing, China Higher Education Press Hashemi S. M. Richard M. J. Free vibrational analysis of axially loaded bending-torsion coupled beams: a dynamic finite element Computers & Structures 2000 77 6 711 724 2-s2.0-0342954847 10.1016/s0045-7949(00)00012-2 Chen S. Géradin M. Lamine E. An improved dynamic stiffness method and modal analysis for beam-like structures Computers & Structures 1996 60 5 725 731 10.1016/0045-7949(95)00448-3 2-s2.0-0030195690 Banerjee J. R. Su H. Jayatunga C. A dynamic stiffness element for free vibration analysis of composite beams and its application to aircraft wings Computers & Structures 2008 86 6 573 579 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.04.027 2-s2.0-39749200791 Banerjee J. R. Guo S. Howson W. P. Exact dynamic stiffness matrix of a bending-torsion coupled beam including warping Computers and Structures 1996 59 4 613 621 10.1016/0045-7949(95)00307-X 2-s2.0-0030151724 Shavezipur M. Hashemi S. M. Free vibration of triply coupled centrifugally stiffened nonuniform beams, using a refined dynamic finite element method Aerospace Science and Technology 2009 13 1 59 70 10.1016/j.ast.2008.03.003 2-s2.0-58049096642 Chopra A. K. Dynamics of Structures 2000 Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA Prentice Hall Hu X.-L. Dai Z.-M. On the dynamic stress concentrations in orthotropic plates with an arbitrary cutout Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics 1998 15 1 12 17 Wang X. Yang L. Gao W. Dynamic FEM analysis for the integration ballast structure based on variation principle Journal of Vibration and Shock 2005 24 4 99 102 2-s2.0-26944472050 Hashemi S. M. Richard M. J. A dynamic finite element (DFE) method for free vibrations of bending-torsion coupled beams Aerospace Science and Technology 2000 4 1 41 55 10.1016/s1270-9638(00)00114-0 2-s2.0-0034383814 Pagani A. Carrera E. Boscolo M. Banerjee J. R. Refined dynamic stiffness elements applied to free vibration analysis of generally laminated composite beams with arbitrary boundary conditions Composite Structures 2014 110 1 305 316 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.010 2-s2.0-84893021842 Nabi S. M. Ganesan N. A generalized element for the free vibration analysis of composite beams Computers and Structures 1994 51 5 607 610 10.1016/0045-7949(94)90068-X 2-s2.0-0028762820 Zhao L. Chen Q. Dynamic analysis of the stochastic variational principle and stochastic finite element method for structures with random parameters Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics 1998 15 3 263 274 Wang G.-H. Gan Y.-N. Wang Z.-B. Energy-variational method for the dynamic response of thin-walled I-beams with wide flange Engineering Mechanics 2010 27 8 15 20 2-s2.0-77956337681