Obstetrics and Gynecology InternationalVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 850313, 7 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/850313

Clinical Study

Phytoestrogens in Human Pregnancy

John Jarrell,¹ Warren G. Foster,² and David W. Kinniburgh³

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, 1403 29 NW Street, Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 2T9²Reproductive Biology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 3Z5³Alberta Centre for Toxicology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 2T9

Received 1 July 2011; Revised 24 February 2012; Accepted 9 March 2012

Academic Editor: Everett Magann

Copyright © 2012 John Jarrell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. The hormonal milieu associated with pregnancy has become a focus of interest owing to potential links with the developmental origins of health and disease. Phytoestrogens are hormonally active plant-derived chemicals that may have an impact on human reproductive processes. However, developmental exposure to phytoestrogens has not been well characterized and thus our objective was to quantify phytoestrogen exposure during pregnancy and lactation. Methods. Women in the second trimester of pregnancy entered the study during counseling for prenatal genetic information. Women who had an indication for a genetic amniocentesis on the basis of late maternal age were approached for inclusion. They completed an environmental questionnaire; a sample of amniotic fluid was collected for karyotype, blood was collected from women during pregnancy and at birth, from the umbilical cord and breast milk. Samples were tested for the presence of daidzein and genistein by GC Mass Spectroscopy. Findings. Phytoestrogens are commonly found in pregnant women’s serum and amniotic fluid during pregnancy. There is a sex difference in the concentrations with higher levels in amniotic fluid containing female fetuses. This difference was not present in maternal serum. Soy ingestion increases amniotic fluid phytoestrogen concentrations in female and male fetuses. The presence and concentrations of phytoestrogens did not differ in relation to common pregnancy complications or preexisting infertility.

1. Introduction

Phytoestrogens are naturally occurring polycyclic phenols that are isolated from certain plants [1]. They are of interest due to their weak estrogenic functions [2]. They are most commonly found in isoflavones and lignans [3]. The most common source of isoflavones is soy-based products either directly or indirectly ingested in the diet [4]. Daidzein and genistein are among the most frequently isolated isoflavones [5].

Importantly, there is considerable variation in the concentration of the compounds owing to different rates of absorption and metabolism [6]. The phytoestrogens are ingested in their beta-glycosidic state which are hydrolyzed in the intestine, absorbed and then undergo glucuronidation in the intestinal wall and the liver [6]. It is the glucuronidated compounds that circulate and are measured in the blood and urine [7, 8]. Excretion is rapid, occurring in approximately 24 hours. There have been few studies of human pregnancy kinetics, but the phytoestrogens daidzein and genistein have been found in amniotic fluid and transplacental passage of genistein has been documented in vitro in human and in vivo in rat placentae [9–12].

There are concerns that these chemicals may, alone or in combination with other chemicals, function as endocrine disruptors, with potentially adverse effects on male reproductive function although there are not sufficient data available to confirm these concerns [13]. One meta-analysis of fifteen placebo-controlled trials with baseline and intervention levels of testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, free testosterone, and free androgen index failed to demonstrate that ingestion of soy foods or phytoestrogens altered testosterone bioavailability. Studies of human exposure during pregnancy have been limited in number [14]. Therefore this study was designed to evaluate the concentrations and correlations of daidzein and genistein in the amniotic fluid, maternal serum during pregnancy, at birth, the umbilical cord levels, and breast milk concentration in relation to important clinical variables and pregnancy outcomes. A parallel study from this cohort of women on the concentrations of chlorinated organic chemical exposure in pregnancy has been reported [15].

2. Methods

Pregnant women attending a prenatal counseling session at Foothills Hospital in Calgary, Alberta, were approached to participate in this project. Approval was obtained from the University of Calgary Ethics committee. Three hundred and twenty-three women were enrolled after their eligibility was determined. They were seeking counseling for age-related genetic counseling and all women were at least 35 years of age. The women were approached during an educational presentation for genetic testing. Although the project was very popular, the total number attending the sessions is not known.

Of those agreeing to participate, two hundred and thirty-eight completed an environmental questionnaire. Amniotic-fluid was collected for testing from three hundred and twenty-three women. Blood was collected from two hundred and nine women during the second trimester of pregnancy, one hundred and five women at the time of delivery, and ninety seven from cord samples at delivery, and forty-seven samples of breast milk were collected. The peripheral blood was collected in red topped tubes in a volume of 10–20 mL, allowed to clot at 4°C and centrifuged.

Clinical information was collected from three Calgary hospitals and three hospitals outside the Calgary Health Region. The samples were collected by the regional laboratory in specially prepared glass tubes, centrifuged and transferred to the Centre for Toxicology, University of Calgary for analysis.

Daidzein and genistein were measured by Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GSMS) using an Hewlett-Packard 6890 Gas Chromatograph equipped with a HP 5973 Mass Spectral (MS) Detector and a Hewlett-Packard Capillary Column HP-5MS (cross-linked 5% PH ME Siloxane) (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness: 0.25 μm) (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Breast milk was vortexed for 5 minutes before being prepared for extraction and serum and amniotic fluid were analyzed without pretreatment. Amniotic fluid was not diluted with Type I water (Milli-Q Synthesis, Millipore Ltd., ON, Canada) and was not extracted with solid phase extraction prior to liquid/liquid extraction. A 1 mL sample aliquot was spiked with internal standards and buffered with the 0.5 M acetic buffer to a pH of 5.2. Daidzein and genistein were obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals Inc., Ontario, Canada. Daidzein-d3 was obtained from Radian International, TX, USA, and Genistein-d3 was obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc., MA, USA. The sample was hydrolyzed for 3 hours at 60°C with the Type H-5 Helix pomatia enzyme (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). After hydrolysis, sample was diluted with Type I water (1 : 1 ratio for serum and 1 : 4 for breast milk) and sonicated for 30 minutes (Bransonic 2210, Branson Ultrasonics, CT, USA). The sample was extracted using solid phase extraction with a conditioned C18 cartridge and eluted with diethyl ether. The eluent was then dried down and reconstituted with water and then further cleaned up with hexane. The aqueous sample was then extracted with diethyl ether. The organic layer was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate and then evaporated down to dryness under nitrogen gas at 40°C. The sample was then derivatized with N-Methyl-N-[trimethylsilyl]-trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) (Sigma M-7891) in Dithioerythritol (Sigma D-8255), (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) at 70°C for 30 minutes, and 1uL of the extract was injected on the GC/MS. The LOQ for the method was 0.5 ng/mL for both diadzein and genistein.

As the results of the concentrations were skewed, analysis was done using nonparametric statistics. Nondetectable concentrations were treated as zero. For comparison between compartments, the Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used. For correlation analysis, Spearman’s test was used. Normally distributed data were compared using t-Test. A was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The demographics and reproductive histories of the women are summarized in Table 1. During the previous year 15.1% of the women reported that they were smokers; 8% continued to smoke during this pregnancy with an average of less than 20 cigarettes per day.

Table 1: Clinical variables.

N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Standard deviation

Age
238
35
48
39.03
2.29

BMI
238
16.47
42.77
24.08
7.11

Gravida
319
1.00
10
2.78
1.52

Parity
317
0
6
0.94
0.93

Term
316
0
6
0.89
0.94

Preterm
316
0
1
0.04
0.21

Stillbirth
318
0
1
0.00
0.06

Spont Ab
316
0
5
0.54
0.89

Therapy Ab
315
0
3
0.30
0.60

Smokers
238
0
1
0.08
0.27

Number of Cigarettes
238
0
20
0.60
2.52

Spont Ab: Spontaneous abortion.

Sixty-six women reported being on a specific diet, most commonly weight reduction, and eighty-five women reported a significant weight loss of an average of 7.3 pounds. A subgroup of one hundred and six women provided detailed information on soy supplementation in their diet.

Of the pregnancies under review there were 291 births in which the following complications occurred: pregnancy-induced hypertension of 8.2%, premature labor of 3.4%, gestational diabetes of 5.2%, low birth weight of 4.8%, and Caesarian section rate of 27%. The mean birthweight was 3404 ± 533 (SD) g. There was no difference in birthweight between male and female infants. The sex ratio (male/female) was 1.13. The frequency of women reporting prior infertility was 12% in this study. Genetic analysis determined that there were two cases of Klinefelter syndrome and 2 cases of trisomy that went on to deliver.

Of the 323 women who had sampling of the amniotic fluid, 300 had testing for phytoestrogens, and of these samples, 185 (62%) contained detectable daidzein and 183 (61%) detectable genistein. The concentrations of the phytoestrogens among all samples and the concentrations in male and female pregnancies are presented in Tables 2 and 3. The serum concentrations were higher in maternal serum during pregnancy than those in amniotic fluid. There were no differences in the concentrations of daidzein and genistein in serum during pregnancy compared to serum at birth. There were significant correlations between the amniotic levels of daidzein with both daidzein and genistein and maternal serum during pregnancy and at birth and cord serum with the exception of serum at birth genistein levels. There were significant correlations of amniotic fluid genistein with both daidzein and genistein in all compartments (Table 4). The degree of correlation was greater for genistein than that for daidzein. Breast milk samples of daidzein correlated with amniotic fluid genistein while breast milk samples of genistein correlated with amniotic fluid daidzein levels (Table 4).

Table 2: Phytoestrogen concentration over the course of pregnancy.

Phytoestrogen concentrations in human pregnancy

N
Mean
Standard error
Standard deviation

Amniotic fluid daidzein
300
0.60
0.08
1.41

Amniotic fluid genistein
300
0.77
0.10
1.78

Serum during pregnancy daidzein
215
2.88
0.88
12.96

Serum during pregnancy genistein
215
5.18
1.84
27.02

Serum at birth daidzein
97
1.21
0.55
5.45

Serum at birth genistein
100
1.48
0.84
8.40

Cord serum daidzein
75
2.30
0.81
7.02

Cord serum genistein
85
2.68
1.07
9.87

Breast milk daidzein
90
0.25
0.11
1.03

Breast milk genistein
84
0.61
0.24
2.20

Table 3: Phytoestrogen concentration during pregnancy by sex of fetus.

                                    Phytoestrogen concentration during pregnancy by sex of fetus

Sex
N
Mean
Standard deviation
Standard error mean

Amniotic fluid daidzein
Male
152
0.41
0.82
0.07

Female
136
0.85
1.88
0.16

Amniotic fluid genistein
Male
152
0.55
1.25
0.10

Female
136
1.04
2.27
0.19

Serum during pregnancy daidzein
Male
118
2.77
13.36
1.23

Female
94
3.08
12.71
1.31

Serum during Pregnancy genistein
Male
118
5.16
27.23
2.51

Female
94
5.36
27.33
2.82

Serum at birth daidzein
Male
55
0.75
1.69
0.23

Female
42
1.82
8.07
1.25

Serum at birth genistein
Male
56
0.68
1.56
0.21

Female
43
2.55
12.69
1.94

Cord serum daidzein
Male
37
2.66
8.28
1.36

Female
36
2.02
5.77
0.96

Cord serum genistein
Male
45
3.27
11.64
1.73

Female
38
2.08
7.70
1.25

Breast milk daidzein
Male
43
0.36
1.41
0.21

Female
46
0.16
0.49
0.07

Breast milk genistein
Male
42
0.87
2.86
0.44

Female
42
0.36
1.21
0.19

Table 4: Correlation analysis of daidzein and genistein between the tissue compartments of amniotic fluid, maternal serum during pregnancy and at birth, cord serum, and breast milk.

Amniotic fluid daidzein
Amniotic fluid genistein
Serum in pregnancy daidzein
Serum in pregnancy genistein
Serum at birth daidzein
Serum at birth genistein
Cord serum daidzein
Cord serum genistein
Breast milk daidzein
Breast milk genistein

Amniotic fluid daidzein
Rho
1.000
0.784**
0.244**
0.204**
0.261*
0.165
0.263*
0.234*
0.210
0.265*

P

0.000
0.000
0.003
0.011
0.106
0.028
0.034
0.053
0.018

N
300.000
300.000
206.000
206.000
94.000
97.000
70.000
82.000
86.000
80.000

Amniotic fluid genistein
Rho
0.784**
1.000
0.233**
0.278**
0.352**
0.322**
0.351**
0.289*
0.226*
0.208

P
0.000

0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.003
0.009
0.036
0.064

N
300.000
300.000
206.000
206.000
94.000
97.000
70.000
82.000
86.000
80.000

Serum in pregnancy daidzein
Rho
0.244**
0.233**
1.000
0.853**
0.299**
0.257*
0.352**
0.304**
0.269*
0.343**

P
0.000
0.001

0.000
0.003
0.010
0.003
0.005
0.015
0.002

N
206.000
206.000
215.000
215.000
95.000
98.000
71.000
82.000
81.000
77.000

Serum in pregnancy genistein
Rho
0.204**
0.278**
0.853**
1.000
0.287**
0.267**
0.313**
0.288**
0.278*
0.373**

P
0.003
0.000
0.000

0.005
0.008
0.008
0.009
0.012
0.001

N
206.000
206.000
215.000
215.000
95.000
98.000
71.000
82.000
81.000
77.000

Serum at birth daidzein
Rho
0.261*
0.352**
0.299**
0.287**
1.000
0.885**
0.824**
0.634**
0.168
0.078

P
0.011
0.000
0.003
0.005

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.197
0.562

N
94.000
94.000
95.000
95.000
97.000
94.000
64.000
74.000
61.000
57.000

Serum at birth genistein
Rho
0.165
0.322**
0.257*
0.267**
0.885**
1.000
0.704**
0.646**
0.100
0.031

P
0.106
0.001
0.010
0.008
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.446
0.824

N
97.000
97.000
98.000
98.000
94.000
100.000
66.000
77.000
60.000
55.000

Cord serum daidzein
Rho
0.263*
0.351**
0.352**
0.313**
0.824**
0.704**
1.000
0.865**
0.452**
0.233

P
0.028
0.003
0.003
0.008
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.002
0.149

N
70.000
70.000
71.000
71.000
64.000
66.000
75.000
72.000
44.000
40.000

Cord serum genistein
Rho
0.234*
0.289**
0.304**
0.288**
0.634**
0.646**
0.865**
1.000
0.540**
0.427**

P
0.034
0.009
0.005
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.004

N
82.000
82.000
82.000
82.000
74.000
77.000
72.000
85.000
49.000
44.000

Breast milk daidzein
Rho
0.210
0.226*
0.269*
0.278*
0.168
0.100
0.452**
0.540**
1.000
0.794**

P
0.053
0.036
0.015
0.012
0.197
0.446
0.002
0.000

0.000

N
86.000
86.000
81.000
81.000
61.000
60.000
44.000
49.000
90.000
82.000

Breast milk genistein
Rho
0.265*
0.208
0.343**
0.373**
0.078
0.031
0.233
0.427**
0.794**
1.000

P
0.018
0.064
0.002
0.001
0.562
0.824
0.149
0.004
0.000

N
80.000
80.000
77.000
77.000
57.000
55.000
40.000
44.000
82.000
84.000

**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Notably there were significantly higher concentrations in the amniotic fluid of pregnancies with female fetuses compared to amniotic fluid of pregnancies with male pregnancies. Amniotic fluid daidzein concentrations from male pregnancies were 48% of the concentrations from female pregnancies while the amniotic fluid genistein concentrations from male pregnancies were 54% of the concentrations from female pregnancies . There were no sex-related differences in serum during pregnancy, at birth, cord serum, or breast milk. Although the mean concentrations of cord daidzein and genistein were higher than maternal blood at birth, these differences were not statistically significant.

Among women reporting their soy intake, there was an increase in the amniotic fluid levels of daidzein and genistein (Figures 1 and 2). There was no difference in the frequencies of intake between male and female fetuses (Table 5). However, women who reported the use of soy products were found to have higher concentrations of daidzein and genistein in the amniotic fluid in pregnancies with a female fetus than with a male fetus (Figures 3 and 4).

Table 5: The relationship of soy in the diet to the sex of the fetus.

Frequency
Male
Female
Total

Soy in diet
never
12
7
19

monthly
28
20
48

weekly
10
11
21

daily
5
9
14

No response
69
60
129

Total
124
107
231

Figure 1: The amniotic fluid levels of Daidzein (ng/mL) by soy diet.

Figure 2: The amniotic fluid levels of Genistein (ng/mL) by soy diet.

Figure 3: The amniotic fluid levels of Daidzein (ng/mL) by soy diet and sex of fetus.

Figure 4: The amniotic fluid levels of Genistein (ng/mL) by soy diet and sex of fetus.

The concentrations of daidzein and genistein did not differ when the levels were compared among women with complications of pregnancy including premature labor, pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational diabetes, low birth weight, or Caesarian section. There were no differences in the amniotic fluid levels of phytoestrogens among women reporting prior infertility compared to those who did not report infertility. There was no increase in the rates of infertility among women who ingested higher concentrations of soy products.

4. Discussion

The results of these investigations indicate that the phytoestrogens are commonly identified in the amniotic fluid and blood of women and fetuses during pregnancy as previously reported [16]. The concentrations are higher in the maternal serum than those in the amniotic fluid although there were no significant differences between amniotic fluid and serum at birth, cord serum, or breast milk. The significant correlations indicate that measures of cord blood phytoestrogens can provide a reasonable estimate of the levels that were present in amniotic fluid, earlier in pregnancy.

One significant finding not previously reported was the difference noted between male and female fetuses with significantly higher concentrations among the female fetuses. No immediate explanation for this is apparent. The birthweights of the male and female infants were similar suggesting that fetal size would not be an explanation. The sex differences in amniotic fluid daidzein and genistein suggest that there may be a differential metabolic handling of these chemicals during fetal life. Previous studies of adult human urine levels of phytoestrogens have not demonstrated sex-related differences however [17]. There were differences in intestinal metabolism of microflora noted in other human studies in response to soy-augmented diet [18].

Soy levels of ingestion were assessed in 102/231 women, and among these women, there was a higher level of daidzein and genistein in the amniotic fluid. This did not appear to be the explanation for sex differences as the frequency of the soy ingestion patterns did not differ by sex. The data suggest that dietary soy concentrations should be considered in the analysis of amniotic fluid concentrations of phytoestrogens.

This finding of a sex difference should be confirmed, as early exposure to these chemicals has been suggested as an important area of research due to the possibility that these chemicals can act alone or in combination with other chemicals as endocrine disruptors [19]. Safety of these chemicals in relation to androgen metabolism in males has been reported [20].

There was no difference in the concentrations between the fetus and mother at birth, consistent with previous studies of the transplacental passage of the chemicals [9, 21].

The strengths of the study are based on it being a prospective study of a large sample size of pregnant women employing direct measurements of exposure with state-of-the-art techniques. The study provides information that demonstrates a dose relationship of phytoestrogens to soy consumption.

The limitations are based on the sample size being too small to evaluate exposure with specific adverse health outcomes, and the study population is not representative of the general population of pregnant women. Also, the samples of cord blood and breast milk are available for only a small segment of the population. In relation to the soy ingestion, there are no data to indicate the type of soy or the last time of ingestion.

In summary, we have demonstrated that pregnant women of advanced maternal age have exposure to phytoestrogens which can be measured in the amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood demonstrating fetal exposure. Moreover, when soy consumption was considered, there was a dose response relationship for phytoestrogens in the amniotic fluid. Finally, concentrations of daidzein were significantly higher in the amniotic fluid of female versus male fetuses suggesting potential sex differences in metabolic capacity of the fetus.

References

CDC, Human Exposure Levels of Phytoestrogens, 2011.

F. Petit, P. Le Goff, J. P. Cravédi, Y. Valotaire, and F. Pakdel, “Two complementary bioassays for screening the estrogenic potency of xenobiotics: recombinant yeast for trout estrogen receptor and trout hepatocyte cultures,” Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 321–335, 1997.

K. D Setchell, A. M. Lawson, S. P. Borriello, et al., “Lignan formation in man—microbial involvement and possible roles in relation to cancer,” Lancet, vol. 2, no. 8236, pp. 4–7, 1981.

S. Vergne, K. Titier, V. Bernard et al., “Bioavailability and urinary excretion of isoflavones in humans: effects of soy-based supplements formulation and equol production,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1488–1494, 2007.

H. Tapiero, G. Nguyen Ba, and K. D. Tew, “Estrogens and environmental estrogens,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2002.

M. K. Piskula, “Factors affecting flavonoids absorption,” BioFactors, vol. 12, no. 1-4, pp. 175–180, 2000.

S. R. Stitch, J. K. Toumba, and M. B. Groen, “Excretion, isolation and structure of a new phenolic constituent of female urine,” Nature, vol. 287, no. 5784, pp. 738–740, 1980.

S. Vergne, K. Titier, V. Bernard et al., “Bioavailability and urinary excretion of isoflavones in humans: effects of soy-based supplements formulation and equol production,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1488–1494, 2007.

B. Balakrishnan, E. B. Thorstensen, A. P. Ponnampalam, and M. D. Mitchell, “Transplacental transfer and biotransformation of genistein in human placenta,” Placenta, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 506–511, 2010.

W. G. Foster, S. Chan, L. Platt, and C. L. Hughes, “Detection of phytoestrogens in samples of second trimester human amniotic fluid,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 199–205, 2002.

N. V. Soucy, H. D. Parkinson, M. A. Sochaski, and S. J. Borghoff, “Kinetics of genistein and its conjugated metabolites in pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats following single and repeated genistein administration,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 230–240, 2006.

G. Degen, P. Janning, P. Diel, H. Michna, and H. Bolt, “Transplacental transfer of the phytoestrogen daidzein in DA/Han rats,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2002.

C. R. Cederroth, J. Auger, C. Zimmermann, F. Eustache, and S. Nef, “Soy, phyto-oestrogens and male reproductive function: a review,” International Journal of Andrology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 304–316, 2010.

W. G. Foster, S. Chan, L. Platt, and C. L. Hughes, “Detection of phytoestrogens in samples of second trimester human amniotic fluid,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 199–205, 2002.

J. Jarrell, S. Chan, R. Hauser, and H. Hu, “Longitudinal assessment of PCBs and chlorinated pesticides in pregnant women from Western Canada,” Environmental Health, vol. 4, 2005.

W. G. Foster, S. Chan, L. Platt, and C. L. Hughes, “Detection of phytoestrogens in samples of second trimester human amniotic fluid,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 199–205, 2002.

D. B. Clarke, A. S. Lloyd, N. P. Botting, M. F. Oldfield, P. W. Needs, and H. Wiseman, “Measurement of intact sulfate and glucuronide phytoestrogen conjugates in human urine using isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with [13C3]isoflavone internal standards,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 309, no. 1, pp. 158–172, 2002.

H. Wiseman, K. Casey, E. A. Bowey et al., “Influence of 10 wk of soy consumption on plasma concentrations and excretion of isoflavonoids and on gut microflora metabolism in healthy adults,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 692–699, 2004.

C. R. Cederroth, J. Auger, C. Zimmermann, F. Eustache, and S. Nef, “Soy, phyto-oestrogens and male reproductive function: a review,” International Journal of Andrology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 304–316, 2010.

J. M. Hamilton-Reeves, G. Vazquez, S. J. Duval, W. R. Phipps, M. S. Kurzer, and M. J. Messina, “Clinical studies show no effects of soy protein or isoflavones on reproductive hormones in men: results of a meta-analysis,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 997–1007, 2010.

G. Degen, P. Janning, P. Diel, H. Michna, and H. Bolt, “Transplacental transfer of the phytoestrogen daidzein in DA/Han rats,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2002.