Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 8102936, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8102936

Research Article

Hydrogen Sulfide Oxidation: Adaptive Changes in Mitochondria of SW480 Colorectal Cancer Cells upon Exposure to Hypoxia

Francesca Malagrinò,1,2 Karim Zuhra,1,2 Ludovica Mascolo,¹ Daniela Mastronicola,¹ João B. Vicente,³ Elena Forte,¹ and Alessandro Giuffrè²

¹Department of Biochemical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
²CNR Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, Rome, Italy
³Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal

Correspondence should be addressed to João B. Vicente; jvicente@itqb.unl.pt and Alessandro Giuffrè; alessandro.giuffre@uniroma1.it

Received 26 September 2018; Accepted 10 December 2018; Published 29 January 2019

Academic Editor: Mario Zoratti

Copyright © 2019 Francesca Malagrinò et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), a known inhibitor of cytochrome c oxidase (CcOX), plays a key signaling role in human (patho)physiology. H₂S is synthesized endogenously and mainly metabolized by a mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing pathway including sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR), whereby H₂S-derived electrons are injected into the respiratory chain stimulating O₂ consumption and ATP synthesis. Under hypoxic conditions, H₂S has higher stability and is synthesized at higher levels with protective effects for the cell. Herein, working on SW480 colon cancer cells, we evaluated the effect of hypoxia on the ability of cells to metabolize H₂S. The sulfide-oxidizing activity was assessed by high-resolution respirometry, measuring the stimulatory effect of sulfide on rotenone-inhibited cell respiration in the absence or presence of antimycin A. Compared to cells grown under normoxic conditions (air O₂), cells exposed for 24 h to hypoxia (1% O₂) displayed a 1.3-fold reduction in maximal sulfide-oxidizing activity and 2.7-fold lower basal O₂ respiration. Based on citrate synthase activity assays, mitochondria of hypoxia-treated cells were 1.8-fold less abundant and displayed 1.4-fold higher maximal sulfide-oxidizing activity and 2.6-fold enrichment in SQR as evaluated by immunoblotting. We speculate that under hypoxic conditions mitochondria undergo these adaptive changes to protect cell respiration from H₂S poisoning.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) has been increasingly recognized as a key signaling molecule in human (patho)physiology. While being able to regulate cell redox homeostasis and other crucial physiological functions at low (nM) concentrations [1–4], at higher (μM) levels, H₂S exerts toxicity both inhibiting O₂ consumption by cytochrome c oxidase (CcOX) in the mitochondrial electron transport chain [5] and impairing O₂ transport/storage through covalent modification of the heme porphyrin ring in globins (reviewed in [6]). It is therefore crucial that cells tightly control H₂S bioavailability to prevent toxicity.

In humans, at least three enzymes are directly involved in H₂S synthesis (reviewed in [1, 7, 8]): cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) and cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE), belonging to the transulfuration pathway, and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MST). Of these, CBS is inhibited with relatively high affinity by nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO), particularly in the presence of the allosteric stimulator S-adenosyl-L-methionine [9–13]. H₂S breakdown is instead mostly accomplished by a mitochondrial enzymatic pathway that couples the oxidation of H₂S into thiosulfate (S₂O₃²⁻) and sulfate (SO₄²⁻) to ATP synthesis [14]. The first step of sulfide breakdown is catalyzed by the membrane-associated sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR). This flavoprotein transfers electrons from H₂S to coenzyme Q in the mitochondrial electron transfer chain, thus making H₂S the first inorganic substrate that is able to sustain mitochondrial respiration [15]. Concomitantly, SQR transfers the H₂S sulfur atom to an acceptor, leading to the formation of glutathione persulfide (GSSH) [16, 17] or, less likely, S₂O₃²⁻ [18, 19]. Differences in the SQR substrate specificity were recently reported comparing the soluble with the nanodisc-incorporated enzyme [20]. Three additional enzymes, persulfide dioxygenase (ETHE1), thiosulfate sulfurtransferase, and sulfite oxidase, cooperate with SQR in the mitochondrial sulfide oxidation pathway, to oxidize H₂S into SO₄²⁻ and S₂O₃²⁻. To process 1 H₂S molecule, mitochondria overall consume ~0.75 O₂ molecules (0.25 by CcOX plus 0.5 by ETHE1, [21]). Besides being metabolized through the mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing pathway, H₂S can be oxidized by several metalloproteins such as globins, heme-based sensors of diatomic gaseous molecules, catalase, and peroxidases (see [8] and references therein) or be catabolized by the cytosolic thiol methyltransferase [22].

In vivo, H₂S can therefore exert a dual effect on cell bioenergetics, at lower concentrations stimulating via SQR mitochondrial respiration and thus ATP synthesis or causing a reversible inhibition of CcOX at higher concentrations (reviewed in [23–26]). Notably, the sulfide-oxidizing activity varies considerably between different cell types and tissues, spanning from undetectable, as e.g., in neuroblastoma cells, to high, as observed in colonocytes [15, 21, 27]. The high H₂S-detoxifying ability of colonocytes is perhaps not surprising as these cells are physiologically exposed to the fairly high H₂S levels produced by the gut microbiota (reviewed in [28]).

Among other diseases, cancer has been increasingly associated with alterations of H₂S metabolism [29–31]. In particular, CBS has been shown to be overexpressed in cell lines and samples of colorectal cancer [32] and other cancer types [33–36]. In colorectal cancer cell lines, CBS-derived H₂S was proposed to promote cell proliferation and angiogenesis and to sustain cellular bioenergetics by stimulating both oxidative phosphorylation and glycolytic ATP synthesis. The enzyme is therefore currently recognized as a drug target [29, 31, 37]. CSE and CSE-derived H₂S have been recognized as key elements in melanoma progression [38]. All three H₂S-synthesizing enzymes have been posited to contribute to the correlation between increased H₂S production and tumor stage and grade in bladder urothelial cell carcinoma [39]. Moreover, Szczesny et al. [36] observed higher expression levels of all three H₂S-generating enzymes and increased H₂S-producing activity in lung adenocarcinoma samples as compared to the adjacent normal lung tissue. A link between H₂S production and mitochondrial DNA repair was proposed, and the inhibition of CBS and CSE by aminooxyacetic acid or siRNA-mediated depletion of CBS, CSE, or MST in the lung adenocarcinoma A549 cell line resulted in compromised integrity of mitochondrial DNA. Irrespectively of the downstream mechanisms linking increased H₂S levels and cell proliferation and/or tumor progression, it remains to be established how cancer cells circumvent the potentially toxic effects of increased H₂S.

Hypoxia is a common factor in the microenvironment of solid tumors that has been recognized to be associated to drug resistance and promotion of cancer progression, metastasization, and angiogenesis (see [40] for a review). The effect of hypoxia on cancer metabolism has been extensively investigated (reviewed in [41–43]). Among other changes, hypoxic cells undergo a reduction in mitochondrial mass, resulting from reduced biogenesis of this organelle and enhanced mitophagy [44–46]. Because mitochondria are the main site of sulfide oxidation, in the absence of compensatory mechanisms, hypoxic cells are expected to display a reduced ability to detoxify sulfide. The intricate interplay between H₂S and O₂ has been extensively investigated (reviewed in [47, 48]). As O₂ facilitates both the chemical and enzymatic oxidative decomposition of H₂S into persulfides and polysulfides, at low O₂ tension a higher stability of H₂S is expected. Furthermore, hypoxic/ischemic conditions have been reported to enhance H₂S synthesis, through upregulation or stimulation of the sulfide-synthesizing enzymes [49, 50], accumulation of CBS in mitochondria, likely augmenting the H₂S mitochondrial levels [51], and release of CO-mediated inhibition of CBS and CSE [52, 53]. Hypoxia is thus expected to increase H₂S bioavailability, a condition that can have opposite physiological consequences. Indeed, while H₂S has been shown to be protective against ischemic injuries [54, 55], the enhanced biosynthesis and chemical stability of H₂S, combined with the reduced content in mitochondria (the main sites of sulfide disposal), may increase the risk of H₂S toxicity in hypoxic cells.

This information prompted us to investigate in the present study the effect of hypoxia on the mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing activity and SQR expression in colorectal cancer cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The human colon cancer cell line SW480 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC no. CCL228™). Sodium sulfide nonahydrate (Na₂S·9H₂O, 431648), 5,5-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), acetyl coenzyme A, oxaloacetate, CelLytic™ MT cell lysis reagent, protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340), and rabbit polyclonal antibody against human SQR (HPA017079) were purchased from Sigma. The bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) kit was from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Cell culture media and antibiotics were from Sigma, EuroClone, or Gibco. Mini-PROTEAN TGX Stain-Free Precast Gels, the Clarity Western ECL Substrate, and the Laemmli protein sample buffer were purchased from Bio-Rad. Bovine serum albumin was from AppliChem.

2.2. Preparation of Sulfide Stock Solutions

Stock solutions of Na₂S were prepared by quickly washing the surface of a crystal of sodium sulfide nonahydrate with degassed ultrapure (Milli-Q®) water and then dissolving it in degassed Milli-Q water under N₂ atmosphere, as reported in [56]. The concentration of Na₂S in solution was measured spectrophotometrically using 5,5-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) according to Nashef et al. [57] in a Cary 60 UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The concentration of Na₂S was then adjusted to 3-5 mM by dilution with degassed ultrapure (Milli-Q®) water in a gas-tight glass syringe.

2.3. Cell Culture

The human colon cancer cell line SW480 was maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 4.5 g·L⁻¹ glucose, supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U·mL⁻¹ penicillin, and 100 μg·mL⁻¹ streptomycin. Cells at 37°C and 5% CO₂ in 25 cm² or 75 cm² flasks were grown under normoxic conditions (air O₂) or incubated for 24 h under hypoxic conditions (1% O₂) in a Galaxy 14 S incubator (Eppendorf) designed to maintain cell cultures at controlled O₂ tension. After trypsinization, the cells were washed in the culture medium, counted using the trypan blue dye exclusion test, centrifuged at 1000 ×g for 5 min, and resuspended in fresh medium at a final density of cells·mL⁻¹. Trypan blue-positive cells were always less than 5%. Cells grown under air conditions or exposed to hypoxia are, respectively, referred to as “normoxic” and “hypoxia-treated” cells.

2.4. Measurements of the Mitochondrial Sulfide-Oxidizing Activity

The mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing activity of tested cells was evaluated as described in [25], by measuring the stimulatory effect of sulfide on cellular O₂ consumption. Measurements were carried out at 37°C, using a high-resolution respirometer (Oxygraph-2k, Oroboros Instruments, Innsbruck, Austria), equipped with two 1.5 mL chambers and a micropump (TIP-2k) allowing for steady injections of relatively small amounts of sulfide into the chambers. According to Abou-Hamdan et al. [25], in these assays, sulfide is injected into a cell suspension at increasing flux (determined by the pump rate) and the mitochondrial sulfide-detoxifying activity is evaluated from the observed stimulation of cellular O₂ consumption. Indeed, upon increasing the rate of sulfide injection, the concentration of sulfide in solution and, in turn, the sulfide-sustained cellular O₂ consumption increase until the concentration of injected sulfide becomes inhibitory for CcOX. In colorectal cancer cells, SQR-mediated sulfide detoxification was shown to promote both forward electron transfer to O₂ via quinol:cytochrome c reductase (complex III)/cytochrome c/CcOX and reverse electron transfer through complex I [21]. Therefore, measurements were herein carried out in the presence of rotenone, a known inhibitor of complex I, to prevent electrons derived from SQR-mediated sulfide oxidation to be partially diverted from O₂ reduction with consequent underestimation of the mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing activity. Herein, the assays were typically conducted in FBS-supplemented cell medium under stirring as follows. A suspension of four million cells was added into the respirometer chamber, and the basal respiration was measured for ~10 min. Afterwards, following the addition of 5 μM rotenone resulting in O₂ consumption inhibition, a solution of 3-5 mM sulfide was injected for time intervals of 180 s at increasing rates (10 nL·s⁻¹, 20 nL·s⁻¹, 40 nL·s⁻¹, 80 nL·s⁻¹, and 160 nL·s⁻¹) and the effect on O₂ consumption was measured. Control experiments were carried out in the presence of both rotenone (5 μM) and antimycin A (5 μM), an inhibitor of complex III. The latter assays allowed us to evaluate the effect of sulfide on extramitochondrial and nonenzymatic O₂ consumption and thus obtain by subtraction (from the experiments performed in the absence of antimycin A) the genuine mitochondrial O₂ consumption activity due to sulfide oxidation and from it an estimate of the H₂S-oxidizing activity, considering that ~1.33 molecules of H₂S per O₂ molecule are reportedly consumed by the mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing pathway [21].

2.5. Evaluation of Mitochondrial Content by the Citrate Synthase Assay

Cells were harvested and lysed using the CelLytic™ MT cell lysis reagent and protease inhibitor cocktail from Sigma according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell extracts were assayed spectrophotometrically for citrate synthase in 100 mM Tris-HCl, 0.3 mM acetyl-CoA, 0.1 mM DTNB and 0.1 mM oxaloacetate, as described in [58].

2.6. Immunoblotting Assays

Cells were harvested and lysed as described in the previous section, and after total protein content determination by the bicinchoninic acid method, proteins (20 μg per lane) were separated by SDS-PAGE using Mini-PROTEAN TGX Stain-Free Precast Gels (Bio-Rad). The formulation of these gels includes trihalo compounds which lead to UV fluorescence emission upon reaction with proteins [59], allowing estimation of the total protein load in a gel lane, using a ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad) without resorting to staining procedures or housekeeping proteins for normalization purposes. Proteins commonly used as housekeepers, such as glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and β-actin, indeed are known to change their expression levels under hypoxia [60, 61]. Afterwards, the proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using a Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Electrophoretic Transfer Cell (from Bio-Rad) at 180 mA for 30 min. The membrane was blocked with PBS-T (phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 (v/v)) containing 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA, w/v) and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the antibody against human SQR (1 : 150, in PBS-T with 3% BSA (w/v)). After three washing steps with PBS-T (15 min), the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1 : 5000, in PBS-T with 3% BSA (w/v)), followed by three washing steps with PBS-T (15 min) and detection by enhanced chemiluminescence (Clarity Western ECL Substrate, Bio-Rad). Finally, the blotted membrane was subjected to densitometric analysis using the Image Lab software (Bio-Rad), followed by the normalization of the target protein band intensity to the total protein load determined as described above.

2.7. Data Analysis

Oxygen consumption rates (OCR) were calculated using the software DatLab4 (Oroboros Instruments, Austria). Data are reported as of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance () was estimated using Student’s -test in Microsoft Excel. , , and were considered significant.

3. Results

Colorectal cancer SW480 cells were either grown under normoxic (air O₂) conditions or exposed for 24 h to hypoxia (1% O₂), and their sulfide-oxidizing activity was assayed by high-resolution respirometry, according to Abou-Hamdan et al. [25], as described in Materials and Methods. A representative oxygraphic trace acquired with untreated (“normoxic”) cells is shown in Figure 1(a). The trace shows that ~80% of oxygen consumption was blocked by the addition of the complex I inhibitor rotenone, added to prevent sulfide oxidation through reversal of complex I activity, as described in [21, 62]. Sulfide was then injected five times at increasing rates into the oxygraphic chamber via a micropump. The first four injections led to the stimulation of O₂ consumption, pointing to a fully operative mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing pathway in the tested cells (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The stimulation persisted for the entire duration (3 minutes) of sulfide injection, after which the O₂ consumption rate (OCR) declined back to the value measured in the absence of sulfide. The decline took a few minutes, as if some sulfide persisted in solution, sustaining cell respiration even after the injection was stopped. The extent of O₂ consumption stimulation by sulfide increased with the rate of sulfide injection (up to 80 nL·s⁻¹, Figures 1(a) and 1(c)). However, upon further increasing the injection rate (to 160 nL·s⁻¹), a decline in OCR was observed already before sulfide injection was stopped, likely due to CcOX inhibition by sulfide, as suggested previously [25].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 1: Stimulation of O₂ consumption by sulfide. Representative oxygen consumption traces (blue) and corresponding O₂ consumption rate (OCR, red traces) acquired with normoxic (a) or hypoxia-treated SW480 cells (b), following the addition of cells (), rotenone (Rot., 5 μM) either alone (top traces) or plus antimycin A (Ant. A, 5 μM, bottom traces), and subsequent injection of a sulfide solution (3-5 mM) at increasing rates (10 nL·s⁻¹, 20 nL·s⁻¹, 40 nL·s⁻¹, 80 nL·s⁻¹, and 160 nL·s⁻¹, corresponding, respectively, to injections #1 to #5). (c, d) OCR values obtained from the oxygraphic traces, respectively shown in (a) and (b), measured at basal condition and upon sulfide injection at increasing rates after addition of rotenone alone (full symbols) or rotenone plus antimycin A (hollow symbols). Mitochondrial H₂S consumption in normoxic cells was calculated by determining the OCR measured at the highest non-inhibitory H₂S injection rate (highlighted with grey bar in (c)) and subtracting the OCR measured after the addition of rotenone (horizontal dashed line in (c)), yielding ΔOCR(-Ant). Then, the ΔOCR at the corresponding sulfide injection in the antimycin A-containing measurement was calculated in the same manner, yielding ΔOCR(+Ant). By calculating , the genuine mitochondrial H₂S-dependent OCR (OCRmitH2S) was determined. Finally, OCRmitH2S was multiplied by 1.33 to account for the number of H₂S molecules consumed per O₂ molecule, yielding an estimated sulfide oxidizing activity of 12.7 nM H₂S·s⁻¹·10⁶ cells⁻¹. Employing the same procedure for cells exposed to hypoxia (b, d), an activity of 9.5 nM H₂S·s⁻¹·10⁶ cells⁻¹ was estimated.

For comparison, the measurements described above were carried out on the same cells after 24 h exposure to hypoxic conditions. A representative oxygraphic trace is shown in Figure 1(b). Hypoxia-treated cells displayed a lower basal respiratory activity compared to untreated cells ( O₂·s⁻¹ vs. O₂·s⁻¹ per million cells). Yet, as observed for normoxic cells, after rotenone addition a progressive stimulation of cell respiration was observed upon injecting sulfide at an increasing rate (Figures 1(b) and 1(d)), until the amount of injected sulfide exceeded the detoxifying activity of the cells, and CcOX inhibition occurred, leading to impairment of cell respiration (see last sulfide injection in Figure 1(b), top).

To evaluate the contribution of mitochondria to the observed sulfide-oxidizing activity, we used antimycin A, a known inhibitor of complex III that blocks quinol oxidation in the respiratory chain and thus prevents sulfide oxidation by mitochondria [25]. As shown in Figures 1(a) and 1(b) (bottom traces), in the presence of rotenone, antimycin A considerably prevented O₂ consumption stimulation by sulfide in both normoxic and hypoxia-treated cells, proving that under the tested conditions sulfide oxidation occurs mostly at the mitochondrial level. The effect of sulfide on mitochondrial O₂ consumption was quantitatively evaluated by subtracting the OCR values measured during sulfide injection in the presence of both rotenone and antimycin A from those measured at identical sulfide injection rates in the presence of rotenone only (see legend of Figure 1 for more details). According to this analysis, at the highest non-inhibitory (for CcOX) injection rate sulfide sustained a mitochondrial O₂ consumption of O₂·s⁻¹ and O₂·s⁻¹ per million cells, in normoxic and hypoxia-treated cells, respectively. Considering that the mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing pathway overall was reported to consume ~1.33 molecules of H₂S per O₂ molecule [21], a mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing activity of and H₂S·s⁻¹ per million cells was estimated for normoxic and hypoxia-treated cells, respectively (Figure 2(a)). To evaluate the mitochondrial content in the tested cells, we carried out citrate synthase activity assays, a validated surrogate biomarker of mitochondrial content ([63] and references therein). Normoxic and hypoxia-treated cells displayed, respectively, a citrate synthase activity of ·min⁻¹·10⁶ cells⁻¹ and ·min⁻¹·10⁶ cells⁻¹ (Figure 2(b)), consistent with a reduction in the mitochondrial content upon exposure to hypoxia [44–46]. The measured citrate synthase activity was used to normalize the calculated mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing activity, which proved to be in hypoxia-treated cells ~1.4-fold higher than in normoxic cells (Figure 2(c)). Finally, we have assayed by immunoblotting combined with “stain-free” imaging technology the SQR expression level in the tested cells (Figure 3(a)) and found that hypoxia-treated cells display 1.4-fold higher SQR protein levels than normoxic cells (Figure 3(b)). Considering that hypoxia-treated cells have a lower mitochondrial content (based on citrate synthase activity assays, Figure 2(b)), we estimate that the mitochondria of hypoxia-treated cells contain 2.6-fold more SQR than those of normoxic cells (Figure 3(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2: Effect of hypoxia on mitochondrial sulfide consumption. (a) Mean values of maximal estimated sulfide consumption activity (calculated as described in the legend of Figure 1(c)), measured in normoxic (, blue bar) and hypoxia-treated (, red bar) cells. (b) Citrate synthase activity in normoxic (, blue bar) and hypoxia-treated (, red bar) cell lysates. (c) Maximal sulfide consumption activity normalized to the citrate synthase activity, as measured in normoxic (blue bar) and hypoxia-treated (red bar) cells. ; ; .

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3: Effect of hypoxia on SQR expression. Representative Western blot analyzing SQR expression in normoxic and hypoxia-exposed SW480 cells (a), with the corresponding total protein load quantitation by stain-free imaging technology (see Materials and Methods). SQR levels in normoxic ( in triplicate, blue bars) and hypoxia-treated cells ( in triplicate, red bars), as normalized to total protein (b) or citrate synthase activity (c). .

4. Discussion

O₂ and H₂S are key molecules in living systems, able to control each other’s availability, and regulate numerous processes in human (patho)physiology. As reviewed in [47], the interplay between H₂S and O₂ is intricate and based on several mechanisms: (i) direct reaction between the two, (ii) O₂-dependent H₂S breakdown through the mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing pathway, (iii) H₂S-mediated stimulation or inhibition of mitochondrial O₂ consumption, (iv) O₂-dependent regulation of expression and cellular relocalization of the H₂S-synthesizing enzymes, and (v) O₂-dependent control of CO-mediated inhibition of H₂S production by CBS. H₂S has indeed been recognized as an O₂ sensor [64]. Despite this, to our knowledge no studies have been conducted yet to explore the effect of prolonged exposure to hypoxia on the cell ability to dispose of H₂S, which represented the main objective of the present study.

Under hypoxic conditions, H₂S plays a key protective role against ischemia/reperfusion damages [54, 55] through only partly understood molecular mechanisms including induction of antioxidant and vasorelaxation effects on microcirculation. Moreover, H₂S appears to mediate the repair of damaged mitochondrial DNA [36], occurring in ischemia/reperfusion, and to protect from hypoxia-induced proteostasis disruption, as demonstrated in Caenorhabditis elegans [65]. In knockdown experiments with Hepa1-6 cells, H₂S-mediated protection during O₂ deprivation was found to require SQR [66], pointing to a key role of H₂S catabolism in the cellular protective responses to hypoxia. Consistently, under hypoxic conditions, thiosulfate, a major product of H₂S oxidation, has been shown to exert protective effects against ischemia/reperfusion damage [66–68] and also to generate H₂S [69]. In this context, it is noteworthy that H₂S is able to mimic hypoxia-induced responses such as vasodilation [70], neoangiogenesis [71], and expression of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1α, [72]), a master gene regulator promoting cell survival under hypoxic conditions shown to stimulate CBS expression in hypoxia [49]. The occurrence of H₂S under hypoxic conditions is therefore likely part of a more general adaptive response adopted by the cells to ensure survival and protection from damages resulting from O₂ deprivation (and possible reoxygenation).

In hypoxic cells, H₂S bioavailability therefore needs to be finely regulated for this gaseous molecule to occur at physiologically protective yet non-poisonous levels. In this regard, it seems relevant to gain insight into the regulation of H₂S production and breakdown at low O₂ tensions. Previous studies focused on the H₂S-synthesizing enzymes have shown that, under hypoxic conditions, H₂S synthesis is enhanced [47] through multiple mechanisms [49–53] (see Introduction). In addition, H₂S breakdown via both chemical and enzymatic reaction pathways is negatively affected by low O₂ tensions. Evidence for a lower mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing activity at lower O₂ concentrations was initially provided in [73] working on immortalized cells derived from alveolar macrophages and, then, corroborated by Abou-Hamdan et al. in a more recent investigation on CHO cells [74].

In the present study, using SW480 colorectal cancer cells as a model, we tested the effect of prolonged (24 h) exposure to 1% O₂ on the cellular ability to dispose of sulfide at the mitochondrial level. Exposure to hypoxia leads to a notable (2.7-fold) reduction in basal respiration and to a marked (1.8-fold) decrease in the mitochondrial content (Figure 2(b)), as previously documented and suggested to result from enhanced mitophagic activity and reduced organelle biogenesis [44–46]. Hypoxia-treated cells also display a lower ability to dispose of H₂S as compared to normoxic cells (Figure 2(a)). However, considering the above-mentioned decrease in mitochondrial content, the sulfide-detoxifying capacity of hypoxia-treated cells normalized to their minor mitochondrial content actually turned out to be 1.4-fold higher than that of untreated cells, pointing to an enhanced sulfide disposal capacity of mitochondria in hypoxia-treated cells. To gain further insight, we analyzed the SQR expression by immunoblotting, employing “stain-free” imaging technology for total protein quantitation and normalization purposes. Using this approach, we made the somewhat puzzling observation that hypoxia-treated cells, though displaying slightly reduced overall sulfide-oxidizing activity, have modestly (~1.4-fold) increased SQR levels. Interestingly, normalizing the SQR expression to the mitochondrial content revealed that, in line with their enhanced sulfide-oxidizing capacity, mitochondria of hypoxia-treated SW480 cells have ~2.6-fold higher levels of SQR than those of normoxic cells. Altogether, these results are intriguing in that they suggest that mitochondria in hypoxia-treated cells display lower mass but are enriched in SQR. The increased SQR levels could have a protective role in hypoxic cells preventing mitochondria to be poisoned by enhanced production of sulfide (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Adaptive changes occurring in mitochondria in response to hypoxia. Upon prolonged exposure to hypoxia, mitochondria become less abundant, but enriched in sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR). Consistently, their maximal sulfide-oxidizing activity increases, while overall decreasing in the cell. These changes are proposed to occur to prevent H₂S inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase (CcOX) and thus protect cell respiration from H₂S poisoning.

5. Conclusions

This is to our knowledge the first study in which the effect of prolonged cell exposure to hypoxia on the mitochondrial sulfide-oxidizing activity has been evaluated. The evidence collected here on SW480 colorectal cancer cells shows that hypoxia-treated cells metabolize sulfide with overall reduced maximal efficacy and have reduced mitochondrial content, but mitochondria are better equipped to dispose of H₂S. Physiologically, this may represent a regulatory mechanism to ensure higher protective H₂S levels, while protecting mitochondria from H₂S toxicity.

Abbreviations

H₂S: | Hydrogen sulfide
SQR: | Sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase
NO: | Nitric oxide
CO: | Carbon monoxide
CcOX: | Cytochrome c oxidase
CBS: | Cystathionine β-synthase
CSE: | Cystathionine γ-lyase
MST: | 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase
SO₄²⁻: | Sulfate
S₂O₃²⁻: | Thiosulfate
DTNB: | 5,5′-Dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)
PBS-T: | Phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 (v/v)
OCR: | Oxygen consumption rate.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universita e della Ricerca of Italy (PNR-CNR Aging Program 2012–2014 and PRIN 20158EB2CM_003 to AG). iNOVA4Health Research Unit (LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007344), which is cofunded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia/Ministério da Ciência e do Ensino Superior, through national funds, and by FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement, is acknowledged by JBV.

References

O. Kabil and R. Banerjee, “Enzymology of H₂S biogenesis, decay and signaling,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 770–782, 2014.

K. Ono, T. Akaike, T. Sawa et al., “Redox chemistry and chemical biology of H₂S, hydropersulfides, and derived species: implications of their possible biological activity and utility,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 77, pp. 82–94, 2014.

E. Cuevasanta, M. N. Moller, and B. Alvarez, “Biological chemistry of hydrogen sulfide and persulfides,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 617, pp. 9–25, 2017.

M. R. Filipovic, J. Zivanovic, B. Alvarez, and R. Banerjee, “Chemical biology of H₂S signaling through persulfidation,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 1253–1337, 2018.

C. E. Cooper and G. C. Brown, “The inhibition of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase by the gases carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, hydrogen cyanide and hydrogen sulfide: chemical mechanism and physiological significance,” Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 533–539, 2008.

R. Pietri, E. Roman-Morales, and J. Lopez-Garriga, “Hydrogen sulfide and hemeproteins: knowledge and mysteries,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 393–404, 2011.

K. R. Olson, “H₂S and polysulfide metabolism: conventional and unconventional pathways,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 149, pp. 77–90, 2018.

A. Giuffrè and J. B. Vicente, “Hydrogen sulfide biochemistry and interplay with other gaseous mediators in mammalian physiology,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, Article ID 6290931, 31 pages, 2018.

M. Puranik, C. L. Weeks, D. Lahaye et al., “Dynamics of carbon monoxide binding to cystathionine β-synthase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 19, pp. 13433–13438, 2006.

C. Gherasim, P. K. Yadav, O. Kabil, W. N. Niu, and R. Banerjee, “Nitrite reductase activity and inhibition of H₂S biogenesis by human cystathionine ß-synthase,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 1, article e85544, 2014.

J. B. Vicente, H. G. Colaço, M. I. S. Mendes, P. Sarti, P. Leandro, and A. Giuffrè, “NO• binds human cystathionine β-synthase quickly and tightly,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 12, pp. 8579–8587, 2014.

J. B. Vicente, H. G. Colaço, P. Sarti, P. Leandro, and A. Giuffrè, “S-Adenosyl-L-methionine modulates CO and NO• binding to the human H₂S-generating enzyme cystathionine β-synthase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 291, no. 2, pp. 572–581, 2016.

J. B. Vicente, H. G. Colaço, F. Malagrinò et al., “A clinically relevant variant of the human hydrogen sulfide-synthesizing enzyme cystathionine β-synthase: increased CO reactivity as a novel molecular mechanism of pathogenicity?” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2017, Article ID 8940321, 13 pages, 2017.

T. M. Hildebrandt and M. K. Grieshaber, “Three enzymatic activities catalyze the oxidation of sulfide to thiosulfate in mammalian and invertebrate mitochondria,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 275, no. 13, pp. 3352–3361, 2008.

M. Goubern, M. Andriamihaja, T. Nubel, F. Blachier, and F. Bouillaud, “Sulfide, the first inorganic substrate for human cells,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1699–1706, 2007.

T. V. Mishanina, P. K. Yadav, D. P. Ballou, and R. Banerjee, “Transient kinetic analysis of hydrogen sulfide oxidation catalyzed by human sulfide quinone oxidoreductase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 290, no. 41, pp. 25072–25080, 2015.

A. P. Landry, D. P. Ballou, and R. Banerjee, “H₂S oxidation by nanodisc-embedded human sulfide quinone oxidoreductase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 292, no. 28, pp. 11641–11649, 2017.

M. R. Jackson, S. L. Melideo, and M. S. Jorns, “Human sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase catalyzes the first step in hydrogen sulfide metabolism and produces a sulfane sulfur metabolite,” Biochemistry, vol. 51, no. 34, pp. 6804–6815, 2012.

K. D. Augustyn, M. R. Jackson, and M. S. Jorns, “Use of tissue metabolite analysis and enzyme kinetics to discriminate between alternate pathways for hydrogen sulfide metabolism,” Biochemistry, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 986–996, 2017.

A. P. Landry, D. P. Ballou, and R. Banerjee, “Modulation of catalytic promiscuity during hydrogen sulfide oxidation,” ACS Chemical Biology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1651–1658, 2018.

E. Lagoutte, S. Mimoun, M. Andriamihaja, C. Chaumontet, F. Blachier, and F. Bouillaud, “Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide remains a priority in mammalian cells and causes reverse electron transfer in colonocytes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, vol. 1797, no. 8, pp. 1500–1511, 2010.

R. A. Weisiger, L. M. Pinkus, and W. B. Jakoby, “Thiol S-methyltransferase: suggested role in detoxication of intestinal hydrogen sulfide,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 29, no. 20, pp. 2885–2887, 1980.

F. Bouillaud and F. Blachier, “Mitochondria and sulfide: a very old story of poisoning, feeding, and signaling?” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 379–391, 2011.

C. Szabo, C. Ransy, K. Modis et al., “Regulation of mitochondrial bioenergetic function by hydrogen sulfide. Part I. Biochemical and physiological mechanisms,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 171, no. 8, pp. 2099–2122, 2014.

A. Abou-Hamdan, H. Guedouari-Bounihi, V. Lenoir, M. Andriamihaja, F. Blachier, and F. Bouillaud, “Oxidation of H₂S in mammalian cells and mitochondria,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 554, pp. 201–228, 2015.

J. B. Vicente, F. Malagrinò, M. Arese, E. Forte, P. Sarti, and A. Giuffrè, “Bioenergetic relevance of hydrogen sulfide and the interplay between gasotransmitters at human cystathionine β-synthase,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, vol. 1857, no. 8, pp. 1127–1138, 2016.

S. Mimoun, M. Andriamihaja, C. Chaumontet et al., “Detoxification of H₂S by differentiated colonic epithelial cells: implication of the sulfide oxidizing unit and of the cell respiratory capacity,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2012.

F. Blachier, A. M. Davila, S. Mimoun et al., “Luminal sulfide and large intestine mucosa: friend or foe?” Amino Acids, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 335–347, 2010.

M. R. Hellmich, C. Coletta, C. Chao, and C. Szabo, “The therapeutic potential of cystathionine β-synthetase/hydrogen sulfide inhibition in cancer,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 424–448, 2015.

M. R. Hellmich and C. Szabo, “Hydrogen sulfide and cancer,” Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol. 230, pp. 233–241, 2015.

X. Cao, L. Ding, Z. Z. Xie et al., “A review of hydrogen sulfide synthesis, metabolism, and measurement: is modulation of hydrogen sulfide a novel therapeutic for cancer?” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2018.

C. Szabo, C. Coletta, C. Chao et al., “Tumor-derived hydrogen sulfide, produced by cystathionine-β-synthase, stimulates bioenergetics, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis in colon cancer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 30, pp. 12474–12479, 2013.

S. Bhattacharyya, S. Saha, K. Giri et al., “Cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) contributes to advanced ovarian cancer progression and drug resistance,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, article e79167, 2013.

P. K. Chakraborty, X. Xiong, S. B. Mustafi et al., “Role of cystathionine beta synthase in lipid metabolism in ovarian cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 35, pp. 37367–37384, 2015.

S. Sen, B. Kawahara, D. Gupta et al., “Role of cystathionine β-synthase in human breast cancer,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 86, pp. 228–238, 2015.

B. Szczesny, M. Marcatti, J. R. Zatarain et al., “Inhibition of hydrogen sulfide biosynthesis sensitizes lung adenocarcinoma to chemotherapeutic drugs by inhibiting mitochondrial DNA repair and suppressing cellular bioenergetics,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 36125, 2016.

N. Druzhyna, B. Szczesny, G. Olah et al., “Screening of a composite library of clinically used drugs and well-characterized pharmacological compounds for cystathionine β-synthase inhibition identifies benserazide as a drug potentially suitable for repurposing for the experimental therapy of colon cancer,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 113, Part A, pp. 18–37, 2016.

E. Panza, P. De Cicco, C. Armogida et al., “Role of the cystathionine γ lyase/hydrogen sulfide pathway in human melanoma progression,” Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2015.

J. W. Gai, W. Qin, M. Liu et al., “Expression profile of hydrogen sulfide and its synthases correlates with tumor stage and grade in urothelial cell carcinoma of bladder,” Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 166.e15–166.e20, 2016.

B. Muz, P. de la Puente, F. Azab, and A. K. Azab, “The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy,” Hypoxia, vol. 3, pp. 83–92, 2015.

N. Masson and P. J. Ratcliffe, “Hypoxia signaling pathways in cancer metabolism: the importance of co-selecting interconnected physiological pathways,” Cancer & Metabolism, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 3, 2014.

H. Xie and M. C. Simon, “Oxygen availability and metabolic reprogramming in cancer,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 292, no. 41, pp. 16825–16832, 2017.

D. Samanta and G. L. Semenza, “Metabolic adaptation of cancer and immune cells mediated by hypoxia-inducible factors,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1870, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2018.

H. Zhang, M. Bosch-Marce, L. A. Shimoda et al., “Mitochondrial autophagy is an HIF-1-dependent adaptive metabolic response to hypoxia,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 16, pp. 10892–10903, 2008.

G. Solaini, A. Baracca, G. Lenaz, and G. Sgarbi, “Hypoxia and mitochondrial oxidative metabolism,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, vol. 1797, no. 6-7, pp. 1171–1177, 2010.

H. Wu and Q. Chen, “Hypoxia activation of mitophagy and its role in disease pathogenesis,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1032–1046, 2015.

K. R. Olson, “Hydrogen sulfide as an oxygen sensor,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 377–397, 2015.

B. Wu, H. Teng, L. Zhang et al., “Interaction of hydrogen sulfide with oxygen sensing under hypoxia,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Article ID 758678, 9 pages, 2015.

N. Takano, Y. J. Peng, G. K. Kumar et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate human and rat cystathionine β-synthase gene expression,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 458, no. 2, pp. 203–211, 2014.

M. Wang, Z. Guo, and S. Wang, “Regulation of cystathionine γ-lyase in mammalian cells by hypoxia,” Biochemical Genetics, vol. 52, no. 1-2, pp. 29–37, 2014.

H. Teng, B. Wu, K. Zhao, G. Yang, L. Wu, and R. Wang, “Oxygen-sensitive mitochondrial accumulation of cystathionine β-synthase mediated by Lon protease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 31, pp. 12679–12684, 2013.

T. Morikawa, M. Kajimura, T. Nakamura et al., “Hypoxic regulation of the cerebral microcirculation is mediated by a carbon monoxide-sensitive hydrogen sulfide pathway,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1293–1298, 2012.

G. Yuan, C. Vasavda, Y. J. Peng et al., “Protein kinase G-regulated production of H₂S governs oxygen sensing,” Science Signaling, vol. 8, no. 373, article ra37, 2015.

E. M. Bos, H. van Goor, J. A. Joles, M. Whiteman, and H. G. Leuvenink, “Hydrogen sulfide: physiological properties and therapeutic potential in ischaemia,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 172, no. 6, pp. 1479–1493, 2015.

A. R. Jensen, N. A. Drucker, S. Khaneki et al., “Hydrogen sulfide: a potential novel therapy for the treatment of ischemia,” Shock, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 511–524, 2017.

P. Nagy, Z. Palinkas, A. Nagy, B. Budai, I. Toth, and A. Vasas, “Chemical aspects of hydrogen sulfide measurements in physiological samples,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1840, no. 2, pp. 876–891, 2014.

A. S. Nashef, D. T. Osuga, and R. E. Feeney, “Determination of hydrogen sulfide with 5,5-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid), N-ethylmaleimide, and parachloromercuribenzoate,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 79, no. 1-2, pp. 394–405, 1977.

P. A. Srere, “[1] Citrate synthase: [EC 4.1.3.7. Citrate oxaloacetate-lyase (CoA-acetylating)],” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 13, pp. 3–11, 1969.

B. Rivero-Gutierrez, A. Anzola, O. Martinez-Augustin, and F. S. de Medina, “Stain-free detection as loading control alternative to Ponceau and housekeeping protein immunodetection in Western blotting,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 467, pp. 1–3, 2014.

H. Zhong and J. W. Simons, “Direct comparison of GAPDH, β-actin, cyclophilin, and 28S rRNA as internal standards for quantifying RNA levels under hypoxia,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 259, no. 3, pp. 523–526, 1999.

K. Heerlein, A. Schulze, L. Hotz, P. Bartsch, and H. Mairbaurl, “Hypoxia decreases cellular ATP demand and inhibits mitochondrial respiration of A549 cells,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2005.

N. Helmy, C. Prip-Buus, C. Vons et al., “Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by human liver mitochondria,” Nitric Oxide, vol. 41, pp. 105–112, 2014.

S. Larsen, J. Nielsen, C. N. Hansen et al., “Biomarkers of mitochondrial content in skeletal muscle of healthy young human subjects,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 590, no. 14, pp. 3349–3360, 2012.

K. R. Olson, R. A. Dombkowski, M. J. Russell et al., “Hydrogen sulfide as an oxygen sensor/transducer in vertebrate hypoxic vasoconstriction and hypoxic vasodilation,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 209, no. 20, pp. 4011–4023, 2006.

E. M. Fawcett, J. M. Hoyt, J. K. Johnson, and D. L. Miller, “Hypoxia disrupts proteostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Aging Cell, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 92–101, 2015.

C. Hine, E. Harputlugil, Y. Zhang et al., “Endogenous hydrogen sulfide production is essential for dietary restriction benefits,” Cell, vol. 160, no. 1-2, pp. 132–144, 2015.

E. Marutani, M. Yamada, T. Ida et al., “Thiosulfate mediates cytoprotective effects of hydrogen sulfide against neuronal ischemia,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 4, no. 11, 2015.

A. Leskova, S. Pardue, J. D. Glawe, C. G. Kevil, and X. Shen, “Role of thiosulfate in hydrogen sulfide-dependent redox signaling in endothelial cells,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 313, no. 2, pp. H256–H264, 2017.

K. R. Olson, E. R. Deleon, Y. Gao et al., “Thiosulfate: a readily accessible source of hydrogen sulfide in oxygen sensing,” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 305, no. 6, pp. R592–R603, 2013.

W. Zhao, J. Zhang, Y. Lu, and R. Wang, “The vasorelaxant effect of H₂S as a novel endogenous gaseous KATP channel opener,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 20, no. 21, pp. 6008–6016, 2001.

A. Papapetropoulos, A. Pyriochou, Z. Altaany et al., “Hydrogen sulfide is an endogenous stimulator of angiogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 51, pp. 21972–21977, 2009.

M. Beaumont, M. Andriamihaja, A. Lan et al., “Detrimental effects for colonocytes of an increased exposure to luminal hydrogen sulfide: the adaptive response,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 93, pp. 155–164, 2016.

J. Matallo, J. Vogt, O. McCook et al., “Sulfide-inhibition of mitochondrial respiration at very low oxygen concentrations,” Nitric Oxide, vol. 41, pp. 79–84, 2014.

A. Abou-Hamdan, C. Ransy, T. Roger, H. Guedouari-Bounihi, E. Galardon, and F. Bouillaud, “Positive feedback during sulfide oxidation fine-tunes cellular affinity for oxygen,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, vol. 1857, no. 9, pp. 1464–1472, 2016.