Parkinson's DiseaseVolume 2011 (2011), Article ID 125271, 7 pagesdoi:10.4061/2011/125271

Clinical Study

The Possible Clinical Predictors of Fatigue in Parkinson's Disease: A Study of 135 Patients as Part of International Nonmotor Scale Validation Project

Vinod Metta,1,2,3 Kartik Logishetty,¹ P. Martinez-Martin,⁴ Heather M. Gage,³ P. E. S. Schartau,² T. K. Kaluarachchi,² Anne Martin,¹ Per Odin,5,6 P. Barone,⁷ Fabrizio Stocchi,⁸ A. Antonini,⁹ and K. Ray Chaudhuri1,2

¹National Parkinson Foundation Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, King's College London, Denmark Hill Campus, 9th Floor, Ruskin Wing, London SE5 9RS, UK²University Hospital Lewisham, London SE13 6LH, UK³University of Surrey, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK⁴Alzheimer Disease Research Unit, CIEN Foundation, Carlos III Institute of Health, Alzheimer Center Reina Sofia Foundation, Madrid, Spain⁵Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden⁶Department of Neurology, Central Hospital, Reinkenheide, Bremerhaven, Germany⁷Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy⁸Department of Neurology, IRCCS San Raffaele, 00163 Rome, Italy⁹Department of Neurology, IRCCS San Camillo Venice and University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy

Received 23 December 2010; Revised 14 September 2011; Accepted 14 September 2011

Academic Editor: Antonio Strafella

Copyright © 2011 Vinod Metta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Fatigue is a common yet poorly understood and underresearched nonmotor symptom in Parkinson's disease. Although fatigue is recognized to significantly affect health-related quality of life, it remains underrecognised and empirically treated. In this paper, the prevalence of fatigue as measured by a validated visual analogue scale and the Parkinson's disease nonmotor symptoms scale (PDNMSS) was correlated with other motor and nonmotor comorbidities. In a cohort of patients from a range of disease stages, occurrence of fatigue correlated closely with more advanced Parkinson's disease, as well as with depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders, hinting at a common underlying basis.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder which is known to be associated with nonmotor symptoms (NMS) including dribbling of saliva, constipation, depression, sleep disorders, apathy, hallucinations, and dementia [1]. NMS of PD contributes significantly to health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and some NMS such as constipation, hyposmia, rapid eye movement behavior disorder (RBD), fatigue, and depression may be markers of a preclinical stage of PD [2, 3]. In spite of its clinical and patient-related importance, NMS remain undeclared and often undertreated in primary or secondary care [4].

Fatigue is now recognized as a key NMS in PD. It may be present at diagnosis and can complicate late disease and become an overwhelming problem for patients and relatives [5–7]. Indeed, fatigue impacts most dimensions of HrQoL even as a factor independent of depression and disability [8–10]. The largest holistic study of NMS in PD, the PRIAMO study, reported fatigue to be prevalent in 58.1% of a population sample of 1072 patients ranging from 37.7% in early (Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stage 1) PD to 81.6% in advanced (HY stage 5) [11]. Other studies have suggested a prevalence between 33% to 58%, although the method of diagnosis and definition of “fatigue” is heterogeneous [7, 12–16]. However, there is a poor correlation between the severity of mental and physical fatigue suggesting independent aetiologies [17]. Since there is as yet no biomarker of fatigue, patient-reported questionnaires remain the mainstay of measuring and diagnosing fatigue. Specific scales for clinical assessment of fatigue have now been validated for PD and can be used in the clinic while “holistic” nonmotor scales can be used to explore the relationship of other key NMS of PD such as depression, apathy, excessive daytime sleepiness, and fatigue. The Parkinson's nonmotor group (PDNMG) led pivotal studies validating the first nonmotor questionnaire (NMSQuest) and subsequently, the nonmotor scale (NMSS) for PD [18–20]. Fatigue is a key component of domain 2 of the NMSS. It is scored based on the multiplication of its severity and its frequency—a measure that was validated based on the collection of data from an unselected cohort of PD patients from a number of international centers.

Fatigue in PD occurs independent of motor severity. There is a paucity of research exploring the treatment of fatigue in PD. There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of levodopa in treating fatigue [21, 22] while it may be alleviated using methylphenidate [23]. Independent of PD, large cohort [24–26] studies have associated fatigue with a more sedentary lifestyle. Only one study, which evaluated patients with PD, found that lower levels of physical activity, poorer physical function, and less frequent strenuous exercise were associated with increased fatigue (see the work of Garber and Friedman [27]). A study on rats which had 6-OHDA lesioning [28] has suggested a link between increased exercise and reduced loss of striatal dopamine concentrations, with another study showing that later intervention with exercise did not improve deficits [29]. However, no animal studies to date have demonstrated an improvement of fatigue with exercise, and there is no evidence yet to recommend the efficacy of exercise therapy on fatigue in PD in humans.

In this study, we have analysed the prevalence of fatigue from the composite data set used to validate the nonmotor symptom scale. We attempted to explore if other measures used in the study contributed or could be marked as “predictors” of fatigue in this population. We also aimed to discern whether disease severity or pharmacological treatment of PD affected the prevalence of fatigue. An improved understanding of this poorly researched area of nonmotor symptoms in PD could then guide a holistic treatment strategy.

2. Methods

2.1. Design

This data is obtained from the database related to the validation study of the NMSS [18] which was an international, cross-sectional, open, multicentre, one point-in-time evaluation with retest study. Details of the administration of the scales have been published previously.

2.2. Patients

Consecutive patients with PD (patients with Parkinsonism were excluded), of all age groups and disease severity, satisfying the UK PD Brain Bank criteria for diagnosis of idiopathic PD were included after attending relevant outpatient clinics [30]. Patients with a diagnosis of parkinsonism due to alternative causes were excluded.

Patients were recruited from specialist movement disorder clinics at the National Parkinson Foundation centre of excellence at King’s College and Lewisham Hospitals (UK) and also local Care of the Elderly clinics. This ensured that we recruited a range of patients from the composite group. Cases with disease severity spanning Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stages 1 to 5 were studied, and we also attempted to include a proportion of untreated cases. Datasets were included where fatigue data was available and computable.

Only patients able to provide informed consent were selected for the study and demented patients were excluded. The latter would mean that the clinician would exclude patients with significant cognitive impairment that (i)affected their ability to provide informed consent,(ii)affected their ability to complete self-reported items.

The data presented relates to 135 patients included largely from the King’s/Lewisham, German and Italian sites.

3. Ethical Approval

Central ethical approval for the full study was initially obtained via the research ethics committee at University Hospital Lewisham and subsequently all centres obtained site specific ethical approval.

4. Procedure

The scales (listed below) and the nonmotor symptom questionnaire used in the study were applied following a standardized protocol, always in the same order, and there was no reported patient fatigue while completing the scales [3, 18]. Patient and carers took approximately 25 minutes to complete the questionnaire while the investigator-led instruments took 40 minutes to complete.

5. Assessments

The researcher then completed the following battery of standard assessment measures: (i)standard demography form,(ii)unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS) [31],(iii)cumulative illness rating scale-geriatrics [32] (CIRS-G to measure physical comorbidity),(iv)Hoehn and Yarh scale [33],(v)frontal assessment battery [34] (FAB),(vi)nonmotor symptom scale [18].

Sections 3 and 4 of the UPDRS were applied. These domains evaluate motor examination and complications of therapy, respectively. The frontal assessment battery is a short scale exploring assessing cognitive and behavioural function, as a measure of executive capacity in PD.

In addition, the patient (assisted by the research nurse if necessary) completed the following self-assessments: (i)PDQ-8 [35] (a specific instrument for assessment of health-related quality of life in PD),(ii)a fatigue-visual analogue scale (VAS-F) [36],(iii)hospital anxiety and depression Scale (HADS) [37] (a self-administered instrument developed for the detection of mood disorders in nonpsychiatric outpatients attending hospital consulting rooms).

The total time required for a single assessment was approximately 65 minutes per patient.

5.1. Fatigue

For this study the VAS was used as a measure of convergent validity with the fatigue section of the NMSS. Fatigue was assessed using the fatigue VAS validated specifically for PD. Patients were asked about the severity of perceived fatigue by means of visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 represented the worst imaginable fatigue state to 100 representing no fatigue at all [37].

5.2. The NMS Scale

The NMS scale is composed of 30 items grouped in 9 domains: cardiovascular, sleep/fatigue, mood/apathy, perceptual problems, attention/memory, gastrointestinal, urinary, sexual function, and miscellaneous. Each item is scored for frequency (ranging from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent)) and intensity (ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe)). The product of these scores gives the item severity score (0 to 12). Domains and NMSS total scores are obtained by the sum of items scores. The scale has been extensively validated in two large international studies exceeding 700 patients [3, 18].

5.3. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

All patients with established diagnosis of PD satisfying the UK Brain bank criteria were included while all cases of Parkinsonism due to other causes were excluded [13]. Additionally, after data had been collected, patients whose clinical assessments indicated dementia, severe depression (HADS > 13), or major sleep disturbances were excluded as these factors may confound assessment of fatigue.

5.4. Statistics

Descriptive statistics were used for the study variables as needed. For comparisons, the Pearson’s chi-squared, Mann-Whitney test (to test between two groups), and Kruskal-Wallis test (to compare more than two groups) were applied, as the variables did not meet the assumptions for use of parametric statistics. Looking for a balance between error types I and II adjustment for multiple comparisons, the Benjamini-Hochberg method was applied. Association of nonlinear relationships was analyzed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient () with an alpha level set at 0.0001 but with a Bonferroni downward adjustment for multiple comparisons. The statistical software SPSS 19.0 (IBM, USA) was used for data analysis.

6. Results

A total of 135 patients met eligibility criteria with complete datasets. Demographic details and summary of measures are shown in Tables 1–5. Patients had a mean age of 69.7 ± 10.52 years and an age range of 35 to 88 yrs (24.4% TD, 28.9% AD, 46.6% mixed). However, as this was a clinic-based study, only 2% were HY stage 5 while the majority were between HY stages 2-3 (Table 4). The breakdown of NMSS scores in each domain is shown in Table 6.

Table 1: Distribution of disease severity as measured by Hoehn and Yahr stage (H & Y stage).

H & Y stage
Patients ()
Percent (%)

1
16
11.85

1.5
17
12.59

2
22
16.30

2.5
20
14.81

3
42
31.11

4
15
11.11

5
3
2.22

Table 2: Distribution of patients after H & Y stage grouped by severity.

H & Y categories
Patients ()
Percent (%)

Mild
75
55.56

Moderate
42
31.11

Severe
18
13.33

Subdivisions: H & Y 1–2.5 = (mild); 3 = (moderate); 4 + 5 = (severe).

Table 3: Analysis of fatigue scores using Hoehn and Yahr staging of disease progression showed a significant correlation () using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

H & Y categories
Mean fatigue score
Std. Dev.

Mild
67.52
18.33

Moderate
56.83
17.16

Severe
54.94
26.44

Table 4: The distribution of antiparkinsonian therapy used in the patients studied.

Therapies
Patients ()
Percent (%)

Drug naïve
12
8.89

Levodopa monotherapy
50
37.04

DA monotherapy
11
8.15

Levodopa + DA
61
45.19

Others
1
0.74

DA: dopamine agonists.

Table 5: A unified table showing demographic values and assessment scores in this study.

Variable
Patients ()
Mean
SD
Minimum
Maximum

Age
135
69.74
10.52
25
88

Duration
135
5.78
5.19
0
32

Agedx
135
63.88
11.34
29
65

UPDRS 3
130
16.13
8.01
2
44

UPDRS 4
132
2.92
3.03
0
13

Dysk & Flct
132
2.32
2.74
0
12

CIRS Total
135
4.74
2.84
0
15

VAS-F
135
62.52
19.90
10
100

HADS Anx
135
10.73
4.79
0
21

HADS Dep
135
10.19
4.62
1
21

FAB Total
134
14.79
2.83
3
18

PDQ-8
134
28.19
17.82
0
78.13

SD: standard deviation, duration = duration of disease, agedx: age at diagnosis. Dysk & Flct: dyskinesia and fluctuation, UPDRS 3 and 4: unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale domains 3 & 4, CIRS: cumulative illness rating scale, VAS-F: fatigue-specific visual analogue scale, HADS Anx & Dep: hospital anxiety and depression rating scale anxiety and depression domains, FAB: frontal assessment battery.

Table 6: Table showing nonmotor scale (NMSS) data distribution including subitem scores.

Variable
Patients ()
Mean
Std. Dev.
Min
Max

GI
135
4.38
5.14
0
23

Urinary
135
6.44
7.01
0
36

CV
133
2.60
4.04
0
21

Sexual function
135
3.08
5.66
0
24

Sleep/fatigue
135
11.11
9.03
0
48

Perception
135
1.81
4.43
0
36

Mood
135
10.56
14.34
0
72

Attention/memory
135
5.97
8.03
0
36

Misc.
135
6.66
7.38
0
36

NMSS total
133
52.96
41.52
0
243

GI: gastrointestinal, CV: cardiovascular, Misc.: miscellaneous, NMSS total: total score on NMSS.

Data from the application of the fatigue-specific visual analogue scale showed no significant differences between males (1) and females (2) using the Mann-Whitney test (male 62 ± 20.4 versus female 63.1 ± 19.2). Analysis of fatigue scores (grouped as mild, moderate, or severe) using HY staging of disease progression (HY 1–2.5 = 7 (mild fatigue); HY 3 = 8 (moderate fatigue); HY 4-5 = 9 (severe fatigue)) showed a significant correlation () using the Kruskal-Wallis test as seen in Table 3. No significant differences were observed in fatigue scores between the different drug treated and drug naïve patients using the Mann-Whitney test. Correlation measures using Spearman rank correlation coefficient were used between the various variables and fatigue scores and are listed in Table 7.

Table 7: Correlation measures using Spearman rank correlation coefficient measures between the various variables and fatigue scores.

Variable

Age
—
N.S.

UPDRS domain 3
−0.2380
=0.0064

UPDRS domain 4
−0.1968
0.0237

CIRS total
—
N.S.

CIRS domain 1
—
N.S.

HADS anxiety domain
−0.3948
<0.0001

HADS depression domain
−0.4171
<0.0001

Frontal assessment battery
0.3374
=0.0001

NMSQuest total
−0.3122
=0.0003

NMSQuest sleep domain
−0.2823
=0.0009

Other NMSQuest domains
—
N.S.

Hoehn & Yahr staging
−0.2882
=0.0007

PDQ-8
−0.367
<0.0001

NMSS total
−0.3924
<0.0001

NMSS cardiovascular domain
−0.2985
=0.0004

NMSS sexual function domain
−0.2576
=0.003

NMSS sleep domain
−0.3908
<0.0001

NMSS mood domain
−0.3766
<0.0001

NMSS attention/memory domain
−0.2574
=0.003

NMSS misc. domain
−0.2666
0.002

Other NMSS domains
—
N.S.

The key correlations () are highlighted (N.S.: not significant, UPDRS: unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale, CIRS: cognitive impairment rating scale, HADS: hospital anxiety and depression scale, NMSQuest: nonmotor symptom questionnaire, NMSS: nonmotor symptom scale).

Correlation measures using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient associating measured variables from UPDRS, CIRS, HADS, FAB, PDQ-8, Hoehn & Yahr, NMSQuest, and NMSS instruments are also shown in Table 7. Increased fatigue was independently correlated strongly (, ) with HADS anxiety and depression domains, FAB score, total NMSQuest score, total NMSS score, HRQo measured by PDQ-8, and NMS sleep and mood domains.

7. Discussion

Fatigue was noted by James Parkinson (1817) in his original description of the disorder, but it is only in 1993 that studies began describing its prevalence, progression, and impact and characterising fatigue [7].

Studies since then have suggested that sleep disorders, medications, and depression may be possible secondary causes of fatigue in individuals with PD [6]. The prevalence of autonomic impairment, nocturnal sleep disturbances, and depression have been found to exacerbate the subjective perception of fatigue. However, fatigue occurs in patients with PD independent of sleep dysfunction and in nondepressed patients, suggesting that these factors may not be the only contributors to the high prevalence of fatigue in PD patients. Indeed, population-based studies in PD report that sleep disorders and in particular excessive daytime somnolence (EDS) do not account for fatigue in the majority of PD subjects. This relationship is, however, clouded by evidence showing that certain medications used to treat PD are associated with EDS [6].

The PRIAMO study showed that fatigue is present in patients presenting at Hoehn and Yahr stage 1 of the disease while the percentage of patients with fatigue rises as the disease progresses to stage 5 [11]. It is likely that in the majority of PD patients, fatigue is intrinsic to the disease.

Our current study was aimed at exploring these various issues, in particular by using PD-specific fatigue measures which were used as secondary variable measure in the original validation study of NMSS, and employing correlation measures with seemingly confounding variables. The patient base was “real life” and representative of a PD population.

We found no difference in fatigue scores between subtypes of PD. Akinesia dominant cases had similar levels of fatigue compared to tremor dominant types, and fatigue levels were similar between male and female patients. However, using Kruskall-Wallis comparative measures, fatigue levels worsened significantly with worsening disease severity as measured by HY stage and graded as mild, moderate, and severe (Table 2). This observation is in line with the recently reported PRIAMO study where fatigue levels were reported incrementally as HY stages increased [11]. However, it is to be noted that a substantial proportion of mild PD cases, including drug naïve PD patients, experienced some level of fatigue.

The level of fatigue between drug naïve cases and those treated with either mono or combination therapy of antiparkinsonian agents were similar and provides an indirect support for the observation that fatigue in PD appears to be unaffected by conventional PD therapy. However, we observed a trend (although nonsignificant) of better fatigue scores in those treated by combined levodopa and dopamine agonists (fatigue score of 71.3 ± 19.1 in untreated PD versus fatigue score of 60.6 ± 20.6 in combined therapy). At least one study has suggested that pergolide, an ergot dopamine agonist may improve fatigue in PD although controlled studies are lacking [38].

Finally, in an attempt to unravel the positive correlations of fatigue and other measures in PD, a detailed correlation analysis was undertaken (Table 7). The key findings were that anxiety and depression as measured by the HADS anxiety and depression subscales, and the mood domain of NMSS showed a robust association with fatigue scores on VAS. Sleep dysfunction was also associated highly significantly with fatigue while HY score also registered a significant association. All together this translated to a robust association with health-related quality of life as measured by PDQ-8.

The association of fatigue with sleep dysfunction and anxiety and depression appears confirmatory with other observations as quoted previously while the lack of association with age, sex, and pattern of PD is also in line with established views on fatigue [6]. Statistically the dominant predictive factors of fatigue emerging from this study are depression, anxiety, and sleep dysfunction. This was our a priori hypothesis and may support a view held by Shulman et al. who suggested that nonmotor symptoms of PD such as fatigue, depression, and pain could share the same pathogenic origin [39].

Indeed, a recent study suggests that reduced serotonin (and perhaps dopamine) in certain areas of the brain may provide the pathophysiological basis of fatigue in PD [40]. Pavese et al. [40] used ¹¹C-DASB imaging to demonstrate reduced serotonin transporter binding in the caudate, putamen, ventral striatum, and thalamus in PD patients with fatigue. Although there was no difference between nigrostriatal dopamine levels as measured by ¹⁵F-dopa values, reduced uptake in the insular cortex of PD patients with fatigue points to a link between fatigue and loss of extrastriatal dopaminergic function. Methylphenidate, a dopamine transporter blocker, has been shown to be effective in improving fatigue in PD patients [23]. While SSRIs have been used to treat chronic fatigue, and anecdotally to address fatigue in PD, the ¹¹C-DASB findings suggest that treatment strategy should aim to restore serotonin levels rather than inhibit its transport (via the serotonin transporter, SERT).

Although it is clinically difficult to separate fatigue and sleep given the difficulty a patient may have in distinguishing the two, several studies have suggested that fatigue is an independent nonmotor symptom unrelated to sleepiness [7, 16]. Sleepiness in PD has been associated to damage to central arousal systems by neuronal loss and Lewy bodies in several areas including serotonergic neurons in the raphe median nucleus.

Isolating depression from fatigue in PD can also be challenging. Although it has been shown that fatigue occurs more in the depressed patient than in the general population [41, 42], this relationship is obscured by varying definitions of “fatigue” in the literature. More so, symptoms of fatigue and anergia contribute to the disability of depression. However, there are reports demonstrating that PD patients may experience depression and/or sleepiness without fatigue [5]. Depression has long been associated with widespread serotonergic loss [43, 44]. One small study has shown that nortriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant with moderate antiserotonin receptor effects, improved symptoms of fatigue [45].

Although it is unlikely that one neuronal hormone, be it serotonin or dopamine, is responsible for fatigue, sleepiness, anxiety, or depression in PD, this study shows a commonality between these nonmotor symptoms, and is thus consistent with the hypothesis proposed by Shulman et al. Less robust association was observed for instance with cardiovascular NMS such as orthostatic tolerance, sexual function, pain, hyperhidrosis, attention, and memory functions (Table 7). Further studies must be designed to disentangle the specific relationship of these issues with fatigue, including the role of sleep pattern in fatigued PD patients, and explore alternative strategies to target the role of low central serotonin levels in these patients.

In conclusion, this study suggests that fatigue is an important independent nonmotor symptom of PD and is associated with depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders. Fatigue appears to be widespread irrespective of the motor stage of PD and has a close correlation with quality of life in people with Parkinson’s.

Acknowledgment

The authors are members of PDNMG and EUROPAR.

References

K. R. Chaudhuri, D. G. Healy, and A. H. Schapira, “Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease: diagnosis and management,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 235–245, 2006.

K. R. Chaudhuri and Y. Naidu, “Early Parkinson's disease and non-motor issues,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 255, supplement 5, pp. 33–38, 2008.

P. Martinez-Martin, C. Rodriguez-Blazquez, K. Abe et al., “International study on the psychometric attributes of the non-motor symptoms scale in Parkinson disease,” Neurology, vol. 73, no. 19, pp. 1584–1591, 2009.

K. R. Chaudhuri, C. Prieto-Jurcynska, Y. Naidu et al., “The nondeclaration of nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease to health care professionals: an international study using the nonmotor symptoms questionnaire,” Movement Disorders, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 704–709, 2010.

G. Alves, T. Wentzel-Larsen, and J. P. Larsen, “Is fatigue an independent and persistent symptom in patients with Parkinson disease?” Neurology, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1908–1911, 2004.

J. H. Friedman and H. Friedman, “Fatigue in Parkinson's disease: a nine-year follow-up,” Movement Disorders, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1120–1122, 2001.

J. J. van Hilten, M. Weggeman, E. A. van der Velde, G. A. Kerkhof, J. G. Van Dijk, and R. A. C. Roos, “Sleep, excessive daytime sleepiness and fatigue in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 235–244, 1993.

E. Havlikova, J. Rosenberger, I. Nagyova et al., “Clinical and psychosocial factors associated with fatigue in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 187–192, 2008.

E. Havlikova, J. Rosenberger, I. Nagyova et al., “Impact of fatigue on quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 475–480, 2008.

K. Herlofson and J. P. Larsen, “The influence of fatigue on health-related quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2003.

P. Barone, A. Antonini, C. Colosimo et al., “The PRIAMO study: a multicenter assessment of nonmotor symptoms and their impact on quality of life in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1641–1649, 2009.

J. J. van Hilten, G. Hoogland, E. A. van der Velde, H. A. M. Middelkoop, G. A. Kerkhof, and R. A. C. Roos, “Diurnal effects of motor activity and fatigue in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 874–877, 1993.

J. Friedman and H. Friedman, “Fatigue in Parkinson's disease,” Neurology, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2016–2018, 1993.

L. M. Shulman, R. L. Taback, A. A. Rabinstein, and W. J. Weiner, “Non-recognition of depression and other non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 193–197, 2002.

K. Abe, M. Takanashi, and T. Yanagihara, “Fatigue in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Behavioural Neurology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 103–106, 2000.

K. Karlsen, J. P. Larsen, E. Tandberg, and K. Jørgensen, “Fatigue in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 237–241, 1999.

J. S. Lou, G. Kearns, B. Oken, G. Sexton, and J. Nutt, “Exacerbated physical fatigue and mental fatigue in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 190–196, 2001.

K. R. Chaudhuri, P. Martinez-Martin, R. G. Brown et al., “The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson's disease: results from an international pilot study,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 1901–1911, 2007.

K. R. Chaudhuri, P. Martinez-Martin, A. H. V. Schapira et al., “International multicenter pilot study of the first comprehensive self-completed nonmotor symptoms questionnaire for Parkinson's disease: the NMSQuest study,” Movement Disorders, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 916–923, 2006.

K. R. Chaudhuri, L. Yates, and P. Martinez-Martin, “The non-motor symptom complex of Parkinson's disease: a comprehensive assessment is essential,” Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 275–283, 2005.

J. S. Lou, G. Kearns, T. Benice, B. Oken, G. Sexton, and J. Nutt, “Levodopa improves physical fatigue in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study,” Movement Disorders, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1108–1114, 2003.

G. Schifitto, J. H. Friedman, D. Oakes et al., “Fatigue in levodopa-naïve subjects with Parkinson disease,” Neurology, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 481–485, 2008.

D. A. Mendonça, K. Menezes, and M. S. Jog, “Methylphenidate improves fatigue scores in Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 2070–2076, 2007.

R. G. Laforge, J. S. Rossi, J. O. Prochaska, W. F. Velicer, D. A. Levesque, and C. A. McHorney, “Stage of regular exercise and health-related quality of life,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 349–360, 1999.

A. Vuillemin, S. Boini, S. Bertrais et al., “Leisure time physical activity and health-related quality of life,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 562–569, 2005.

G. C. Wendel-Vos, A. J. Schuit, M. A. R. Tijhuis, and D. Kromhout, “Leisure time physical activity and health-related quality of life: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 667–677, 2004.

C. E. Garber and J. H. Friedman, “Effects of fatigue on physical activity and function in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Neurology, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1119–1124, 2003.

N. P. Poulton and G. D. Muir, “Treadmill training ameliorates dopamine loss but not behavioral deficits in hemi-Parkinsonian rats,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 181–197, 2005.

A. D. Cohen, J. L. Tillerson, A. D. Smith, T. Schallert, and M. J. Zigmond, “Neuroprotective effects of prior limb use in 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats: possible role of GDNF,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 299–305, 2003.

A. J. Hughes, S. E. Daniel, L. Kilford, and A. J. Lees, “Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 181–184, 1992.

S. Fahn, R. L. Elton, and Members of the UPDRS Development Committee, “Unified Parkinson’s disease Rating Scale,” in Recent Developments in Parkinson’s Disease, S. Fahn, et al., Ed., pp. 153–164, Macmillan Healthcare Information, Florham Park, NJ, USA, 1987.

B. S. Linn, M. W. Linn, and L. Gurel, “Cumulative illness rating scale,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 622–626, 1968.

M. M. Hoehn and M. D. Yahr, “Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality,” Neurology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 427–442, 1967.

B. Dubois, A. Slachevsky, I. Litvan, and B. Pillon, “The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside,” Neurology, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1621–1626, 2000.

C. Jenkinson, R. Fitzpatrick, V. Peto, R. Greenhall, and N. Hyman, “The Parkinson's disease questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson's disease summary index score,” Age and Ageing, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 353–357, 1997.

P. Martínez-Martín, J. Benito-León, F. Alonso et al., “Quality of life of caregivers in Parkinson's disease,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 463–472, 2005.

A. S. Zigmond and R. P. Snaith, “The hospital anxiety and depression scale,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 361–370, 1983.

K. Abe, M. Takanashi, T. Yanagihara, and S. Sakoda, “Pergolide mesilate may improve fatigue in patients with Parkinson's disease,” Behavioural Neurology, vol. 13, no. 3-4, pp. 117–121, 2001.

L. M. Shulman, R. L. Taback, J. Bean, and W. J. Weiner, “Comorbity of the nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 507–510, 2001.

N. Pavese, V. Metta, S. K. Bose, K. R. Chaudhuri, and D. J. Brooks, “Fatigue in Parkinson's disease is linked to striatal and limbic serotonergic dysfunction,” Brain, vol. 133, no. 11, pp. 3434–3443, 2010.

S. M. Stahl, L. Zhang, C. Damatarca, and M. Grady, “Brain circuits determine destiny in depression: a novel approach to the psychopharmacology of wakefulness, fatigue, and executive dysfunction in major depressive disorder,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 64, supplement 14, pp. 6–17, 2003.

A. Tylee, M. Gastpar, J.-P. Lépine, and J. Mendlewicz, “DEPRES II (Depression Research in European Society II): a patient survey of the symptoms, disability and current management of depression in the community. DEPRES Steering Committee,” International Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 139–151, 1999.

W. C. Drevets, M. E. Thase, E. L. Moses-Kolko et al., “Serotonin-1A receptor imaging in recurrent depression: replication and literature review,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 865–877, 2007.

P. A. Sargent, K. Husted Kjaer, C. J. Bench et al., “Brain serotonin1A receptor binding measured by positron emission tomography with [¹¹C]WAY-100635: effects of depression and antidepressant treatment,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 174–180, 2000.

J. Andersen, E. Aabro, and N. Gulmann, “Anti-depressive treatment in Parkinson's disease. A controlled trial of the effect of nortriptyline in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with L-DOPA,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 210–219, 1980.