Pulmonary Medicine
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 6838439, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6838439

Review Article

Role of Convex Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonmalignant Diseases

Ahmed A. Aljohaney

Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence should be addressed to Ahmed A. Aljohaney; aaljohani@kau.edu.sa

Received 13 November 2018; Revised 31 May 2019; Accepted 7 June 2019; Published 17 June 2019

Academic Editor: Roberto Walter Dal Negro

Copyright © 2019 Ahmed A. Aljohaney. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Here we present a comprehensive review of the literature concerning the utility of convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) in the diagnosis and treatment of nonmalignant conditions and discuss the associated complications. CP-EBUS has been conventionally used for the staging of lung cancer and sampling of mediastinal and hilar nodes. However, its application is not limited to malignant conditions, and it is gaining acceptance as a diagnostic modality of choice for nonmalignant conditions such as tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, pulmonary embolism, thyroid lesions, and cysts. Moreover, its therapeutic value allows for extended applications such as mediastinal and thyroid cyst drainage, fiducial marker placement for radiation therapy, and transbronchial needle injection. The noninvasiveness, low complication rate, high diagnostic yield, and satisfactory sensitivity and specificity values are the main attributes that lend credence to the use of CP-EBUS as a standalone primary diagnostic and therapeutic tool in pulmonary medicine in the foreseeable future.

1. Introduction

In 1897, a metal tube with an electric light served as the first rigid bronchoscope for the removal of pork bone from the airway [1]. This preliminary design was a breakthrough in the history of pulmonary medicine. In 1904, rigid bronchoscopy crossed its first milestone when the devices were equipped with a suction channel and small light bulb for illumination. In 1966, Ikeda designed the first flexible bronchoscope; however, the first commercially available flexible bronchoscope was introduced by Machita and Olympus in 1968. Video bronchoscopy became available for educational purposes in 1987, following which it evolved and came to be used by surgeons for the monitoring of real-time images of procedures on computer screens [2]. Continuous developments and improvements resulted in the invention of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) in the early 1990s. At that time, a radial probe, which provided better resolution and superior image quality, was used. Although radial probe EBUS (RP-EBUS) provides images of the deeper parts of the airway, it does not facilitate real-time transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA). This limitation was overcome by the development of convex probe EBUS (CP-EBUS) [3], following which there have been few improvements in the appearance of bronchoscopes. Table 1 presents a comparison of RP-EBUS and CP-EBUS, and Figure 1 presents the schematic features of CP-EBUS.

Table 1: Comparison of RP-EBUS and CP-CBUS.

CP-EBUS
RP-EBUS

Flexibility of bronchoscope for view
60°
360°

Real time TBNA Possibility
Yes
No

Doppler mode
Yes
No

Frequency of Ultrasound probe
5-12MHz
20MHz

Tissue Penetration
Low
High

A higher frequency leads to better resolution and image quality and less penetration and a low frequency in ultrasound waves leads to better penetration yet low quality image due to low resolution.

Figure 1: Schematic presentation of features of CP-EBUS equipped with video camera and needle for sampling and a convex ultrasound probe.

Because of its noninvasiveness, CP-EBUS-guided real-time TBNA has largely replaced invasive sampling and diagnostic modalities such as mediastinoscopy. The value of CP-EBUS for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer is well known. CP-EBUS can also aid in the diagnosis of nonmalignant conditions such as tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, and pulmonary embolism and facilitate treatments such as bronchogenic cyst drainage and transbronchial injection [3].

Here we present a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the utility of CP-EBUS for nonmalignant conditions, with focus on its expanded prospects in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Complications associated with CP-EBUS are also discussed.

2. Main Text

2.1. Diagnostic Value of CP-EBUS

2.1.1. Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic inflammatory disorder with an unknown etiology that is characterized by the accumulation of macrophages and the formation of epithelioid cell nonnecrotizing benign granulomas. The lungs and hilar or mediastinal nodes are affected in 90% patients with sarcoidosis; therefore, pulmonary sarcoidosis is the most common form of the disease. Diagnostic modalities include computed tomography (CT), transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB), endobronchial biopsy (EBB), TBNA, and mediastinoscopy. Pneumothorax and haemoptysis are major side effects of TBLB, which also exhibits moderate diagnostic sensitivity. Although mediastinoscopy is highly effective in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, the associated costs and invasiveness limit its routine use. CP-EBUS-guided TBNA is an effective, noninvasive approach for sampling on an outpatient basis. Wong et al. and Garwood et al. first reported the use of CP-EBUS-guided TBNA for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, with diagnostic sensitivities of 91.8% and 85%, respectively [4, 5]. In another prospective study of 39 patients, EBUS-TBNA showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of 93.9%, 100%, 100%, and 94.8%, respectively [6]. A meta-analysis of 14 studies involving 2097 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis reported a pooled diagnostic yield of 0.79, pooled sensitivity of 0.84, and pooled specificity of 1.00 [7]. CP-EBUS is also used to study the echogenic features of lymph nodes in patients with sarcoidosis. A retrospective analysis found homogeneous low echogenicity and the presence of a germinal central structure as the main characteristics of lymph nodes in patients with sarcoidosis [8]. The presence of granules in lymph nodes reportedly exhibits a diagnostic accuracy of 99.3% [9]. Echogenicity analysis using EBUS-TBNA also aids in the differentiation of sarcoidosis from malignancy, as well as the differentiation of benign lymphadenopathies, including sarcoidosis, from cancer recurrence [10].

Several studies have compared sensitivity and accuracy values among various diagnostic modalities for sarcoidosis. Oki et al. presented a positive pathological diagnosis rate of 93% for EBUS-TBNA or TBNA alone and 100% for EBUS-TBNA combined with TBNA [11]. In another study, the diagnostic sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA was significantly higher (85%) than that of standard bronchoscopy techniques (35%) [12]. Comparisons of EBUS-TBNA with TBLB have been presented with contradictory results. A prospective study of 62 patients reported a significantly higher diagnostic yield for EBUS-TBNA (94%) than for TBLB (37%) [13], whereas another study found no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of both techniques [14]. In another cohort of 33 patients with sarcoidosis, the diagnostic sensitivities of EBUS-TBNA, TBLB, EBB, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were 90%, 35%, 6%, and 71%, respectively [15]. However, in a randomized controlled trial including 130 patients, EBUS-TBNA showed a higher diagnostic yield (74.5%) than did TBNA (48.4%) and EBB (36.3%), with no significant difference from TBLB (69.6%). A meta-analysis of studies including 1823 patients with sarcoidosis compared the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA with that of TBLB and found odds ratios of 0.26 and 126.58, respectively [16]. Finally, EUS-FNA and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy showed no significant difference in the diagnostic yield (66.7%), with a combination of the two modalities increasing the diagnostic yield to 100% [17].

Multiple factors influencing the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA have been studied; these include the gauge size, lymph node size, disease stage, number of sampled lymph node stations, and number of needle passes per lymph node. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial found no significant difference between 21G and 22G needles in terms of the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in patients with sarcoidosis [18]. However, the yield of 19G eXcelon core needles was superior to that of 21G EBUS needles in a study of EBUS-TBNA from mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with sarcoidosis; this was attributed to the tissue size obtained with the former needle [9]. In a retrospective chart review of EBUS-TBNA performed with a 19G needle, the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA was significantly higher (93.3%) than that of TBLB (38%) and EBB (43%) [19]. The diagnostic sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA has also been associated with the lymph node size [20] and disease stage [21].

In summary, direct comparisons between conventional diagnostic modalities and EBUS-TBNA have favored the use of EBUS-TBNA as a primary diagnostic tool for sarcoidosis [22].

2.1.2. Tuberculosis

Infectious manifestation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a global public health concern for clinicians and researchers. Sputum or smear culture remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). However, these methods are not efficient for the diagnosis of mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenopathy (TBLA). Moreover, 25% and 60% patients have negative sputum smears and no spontaneous sputum production, respectively [23]. EBUS-TBNA is a noninvasive modality that has been found to aid in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB and TBLA. It helps in obtaining adequate lymphocytic material to test for acid-fast bacilli by staining and examine for the presence of necrotizing granulomas. Steinfort et al. first used EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of mediastinal intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [24]. Subsequently, Lyu et al. demonstrated the use of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant TB [25]. While one retrospective study assessing the diagnosis of TBLA reported a diagnostic yield of 64.6% for EBUS-TBNA [26], another prospective study of patients with intrathoracic TB reported a diagnostic accuracy of 90%, sensitivity of 85%, and specificity of 100% for the same modality [27]. Similar diagnostic specificity (100%) and sensitivity (90.9%) values were shown in a cohort of 93 patients [28]. A meta-analysis of studies involving 809 patients presented pooled sensitivity and specificity values of 0.80 and 1.00, respectively, for the diagnosis of intrathoracic TB by EBUS-TBNA. However, the pooled sensitivity for the diagnosis of intrathoracic TBLA was higher at 0.87. In another meta-analysis of studies involving 809 patients, the pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA for TBLA was 80% [29]. EBUS-TBNA was also found to exhibit a diagnostic yield as high as 96.6% in cases of mediastinal TB, which presents a diagnostic challenge for clinicians [30].

2.1.3. Fungal Infection

Conventionally, diagnosis of fungal infection-related lymphadenopathy requires tissue biopsy for obtaining adequate material for fungal culture. However, Sodhi et al. confirmed the utility of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis in 452 patients, with a diagnostic yield of 78% [31]. In another study, EBUS helped in confirming the diagnosis of histoplasmosis, with no requirement for further invasive procedures [32]. EBUS was also found to be effective in the diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis in a debilitated patient who was not fit enough to undergo invasive procedures [33]. The use of EBUS also facilitates rapid diagnosis in patients with other endemic fungal infections such as coccidioidomycosis [34].

2.1.4. Reactive Hyperplasia

Reactive hyperplasia involving the mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes is a nonspecific diagnosis. The condition is potentially caused by benign etiologies such as fungal infection [32]. CP-EBUS can reliably provide adequate material for the diagnosis of reactive hyperplasia with a high degree of confidence. In one study, operators diagnosed reactive hyperplasia using CP-EBUS in 60% patients [35]. Furthermore, Ko et al. confirmed the accuracy of CP-EBUS in diagnosing reactive hyperplasia in a cohort of patients suspected to have lymphoma or other nonneoplastic lesions [36].

2.1.5. Nocardiosis

Nocardiosis is an infectious disease caused by Nocardia spp. Fujikura et al. successfully used CP-EBUS to sample purulent exudates containing N. asteroids [37]. CP-EBUS-guided TBNA was also used to isolate two Nocardia strains from a lung mass in a patient who had undergone kidney–pancreas transplantation [38]. These findings indicate the diagnostic value of CP-EBUS for nonmalignant mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

2.1.6. Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) occurs when a blood clot gets lodged in blood vessels anywhere in the lungs, consequently blocking blood flow to the relevant parts of the lungs. It is a common disease and can be life-threatening depending on the presence of comorbid conditions, anatomical site, and size of the clot. Thus, prompt diagnosis is essential. Contrast-enhanced CT, ventilation perfusion scanning, and, less commonly, pulmonary arteriography are the preferred diagnostic methods. However, these techniques cannot be used for individuals with contraindications for the use of contrast agents, such as allergy or renal failure, pregnancy, and hemodynamic instability. In such cases, CP- EBUS serves as an effective alternative diagnostic modality.

The pulmonary arteries are located in close proximity to the bronchial and tracheal airways and can be easily visualized by CP-EBUS. CP-EBUS equipped with color Doppler imaging enables the pulmonologist to characterize the size of the thrombus and the extent of the blockage in real time. Casoni et al. initially reported the use of EBUS-CP for the diagnosis of PE in a 26-year-old patient [39]. Subsequently, Aumiller et al. conducted a multicenter pilot study involving the use of CP-EBUS for the diagnosis of PE after angio-CT in 32 patients. Angio-CT detected 101 PEs while CP-EBUS detected only 97. However, CP-EBUS diagnosed at least one thrombus per patient, which was sufficient to establish the diagnosis. Three thrombi in the left upper lobe and one in the middle lobe could not be detected by CP-EBUS. The duration of CP-EBUS was 5 min/patient for the first 16 patients and 3 min/patient thereafter [40]. In 2010, CP-EBUS attempted for TBNA identified PE in the right pulmonary artery in a 69-year-old man. PE was then confirmed by angio-CT [41]. Subsequently, four independent case studies were published in 2011, with each describing a single patient aged 61–83 years who was diagnosed with PE by CP-EBUS [42–46]. The high sensitivity of CP-EBUS was further highlighted by Santaolalla, who presented an unusual case where EBUS-TBNA detected PE after angio-CT failed to do so [44]. Another study involving eight patients monitored for PE in 2013 exhibited encouraging outcomes. The authors indicated the feasibility of EBUS for sampling and diagnosis. When 548 CP-EBUS procedures were performed in one study, four cases of PE, three of which also involved cancer, were detected [47]. In yet another study, 14 patients were diagnosed with PE using EBUS-TBNA [39]. Figure 2 presents the number of studies and patients diagnosed with PE using CP-EBUS on an annual basis.

Figure 2: Number of studies and patients per year diagnosed with Pulmonary Embolism through CP-EBUS.

CP-EBUS can easily visualize and monitor the aortic arch, left and right pulmonary artery trunks, azygos vein, hilum, and lobar arteries; however, the image quality is generally suboptimal because of the low frequency (5–10MHz). Consequently, confirmation by angio-CT is required. Furthermore, the probe diameter of 6.3–6.9 mm facilitates the visualization of clots only in adjacent vascular structures. Nevertheless, CP-EBUS is a safe and sensitive method for real-time evaluation of PE, enabling not only diagnosis but also real-time evaluation of thrombolytic therapies in clinical studies [3].

2.1.7. Thyroid Cysts, Lesions, and Nodules

EBUS-TBNA has been infrequently used for thyroid aspiration. Chalhoub et al. initially reported the use of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of substernal solitary thyroid nodules [48]. In another study, EBUS-TBNA was performed when ultrasound characteristics suggested a cyst. A sample was obtained for histopathological analysis, which revealed plaques and clusters of follicular cells, abundant macrophages, and hemosiderophages. Thus, the diagnosis of a thyroid cyst was confirmed [49]. Casal et al. reported 12 cases of thyroid biopsy performed using EBUS-TBNA [50]. More recently, Ozturk et al. reported three cases of mediastinal ectopic thyroid diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA [51].

2.1.8. Nonthrombotic Endovascular Lesions (NELs)

Al-Saffar et al. systematically reviewed 12 cases where EBUS-TBNA was used for the diagnosis of NELs in the pulmonary artery and lungs. The diagnoses included sarcoma (n = 6), lung cancer (n = 2), thyroid cancer (n = 1), renal cell cancer (n = 1), melanoma (n = 1), and PE (n = 1) [52]. The findings indicated that EBUS-TBNA is a safe and efficient diagnostic modality for NELs and tumor embolisms.

2.2. Therapeutic Value of CP-EBUS

2.2.1. Fiducial Marker Placement

CP-EBUS is reportedly used for the placement of fiducial markers for tracking purposes in patients requiring stereotactic radiation therapy and CyberKnife therapy for mediastinal and lung cancers [53, 54]. Harley et al. successfully used CP-EBUS for the placement of 2–5 fiducial markers around tumor masses in 43 patients scheduled for radiosurgery [55].

2.2.2. Transbronchial Needle Injection (TBNI)

EBUS-TBNI in patients with mediastinal diseases is another therapeutic application of CP-EBUS. Two independent case studies have documented EBUS-TBNI of cisplatin for the treatment of lung cancer [56, 57]. In addition, Parikh et al. used EBUS-TBNI of liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of symptomatic aspergilloma [58].

2.2.3. Drainage

Nakajima et al. initially reported the therapeutic use of EBUS-TBNA for aspiration during the treatment of central airway stenosis caused by a mediastinal cyst. The Doppler mode in CP-EBUS helps in the differentiation of cysts from vascular structures [59]. Drainage of infectious bronchogenic cysts using EBUS-TBNA, with subsequent resolution of symptoms, has also been reported [60, 61]. As mentioned above, EBUS-TBNA is also used in the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cysts [62].

2.3. Complications and Limitations

CP-EBUS is a noninvasive procedure with an excellent safety profile. Although it has several applications beyond the diagnosis of malignancies, it cannot cover the entire mediastinum and allows visualization of only the anterosuperior portion. Moreover, some anatomical locations such as the upper lobes cannot be accessed by CP-EBUS [63]. A nationwide survey by the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy reported a complication rate of only 1.23% for 7,345 cases in 210 facilities. Hemorrhage was the most frequent complication (n = 50), followed by infectious complications (n = 14), breakage of the ultrasound bronchoscope (n = 98), and needle puncture (n = 15) [64].

3. Conclusions

In summary, CP-EBUS is a minimally invasive procedure that plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant and nonmalignant mediastinal diseases. CP-EBUS-guided TBNA provides the highest diagnostic yield in cases involving nonmalignant mediastinal diseases such as tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. However, combination with TBLB and EBB increases the yield to 100%, with minimal complications. Furthermore, CP-EBUS can provide adequate information for the diagnosis of most benign diseases without the need for other invasive procedures such as mediastinoscopy. There is overwhelming evidence on the efficacy and safety of CP-EBUS for benign conditions, with the noninvasiveness, low complication rate, high diagnostic yield, and satisfactory sensitivity and specificity values comprising the main attributes that lend credence to its use as a standalone primary diagnostic and therapeutic tool in pulmonary medicine. Therefore, the acquisition of this technology is highly recommended for most institutions to enable pulmonologists to safely and effectively diagnose benign and malignant diseases of the mediastinum.

Disclosure

This research did not receive support from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

T. S. Panchabhai and A. C. Mehta, “Historical perspectives of bronchoscopy: Connecting the dots,” Annals of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 631–641, 2015.

T. J. Paradis, J. Dixon, and B. H. Tieu, “The role of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of airway disease,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 3826–3837, 2016.

P. Li, W. Zheng, and L. Zhao, “Convex probe endobronchial ultrasound: applications beyond conventional indications,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. E289–E97, 2015.

S. Garwood, M. A. Judson, G. Silvestri, R. Hoda, M. Fraig, and P. Doelken, “Endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis,” Chest, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 1298–1304, 2007.

M. Wong, K. Yasufuku, T. Nakajima et al., “Endobronchial ultrasound: New insight for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1182–1186, 2007.

C. Ribeiro, A. Oliveira, S. Neves et al., “Diagnosis of sarcoidosis in the Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration era,” Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 237–241, 2014.

R. Trisolini, L. Lazzari Agli, C. Tinelli, A. De Silvestri, V. Scotti, and M. Patelli, “Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosis of sarcoidosis in clinically unselected study populations,” Respirology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 226–234, 2015.

N. Imai, K. Imaizumi, M. Ando et al., “Echoic features of lymph nodes with sarcoidosis determined by endobronchial ultrasound,” Internal Medicine, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 1473–1478, 2013.

M. A. Ozgul, E. Çetinkaya, G. Kirkil et al., “Lymph node characteristics of sarcoidosis with endobronchial ultrasound,” Endoscopic Ultrasound, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 232–237, 2014.

D. Minami, N. Takigawa, H. Hayakawa et al., “Usefulness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in distinguishing sarcoidosis from recurrent cancer in patients with lymphadenopathy after surgery,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1110–1114, 2013.

M. Oki, H. Saka, C. Kitagawa et al., “Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration is useful for diagnosing sarcoidosis,” Respirology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 863–868, 2007.

N. Navani, H. L. Booth, G. Kocjan et al., “Combination of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with standard bronchoscopic techniques for the diagnosis of stage I and stage II pulmonary sarcoidosis,” Respirology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 467–472, 2011.

M. Oki, H. Saka, C. Kitagawa et al., “Prospective study of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of lymph nodes versus transbronchial lung biopsy of lung tissue for diagnosis of sarcoidosis,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 143, no. 6, pp. 1324–1329, 2012.

M. Plit, R. Pearson, A. Havryk, J. Da Costa, C. Chang, and A. R. Glanville, “Diagnostic utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with transbronchial and endobronchial biopsy for suspected sarcoidosis,” Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 434–438, 2012.

G. Hong, K.-J. Lee, K. Jeon et al., “Usefulness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosis of sarcoidosis,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1416–1421, 2013.

L.-X. Hu, R.-X. Chen, H. Huang et al., “Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration versus standard bronchoscopic modalities for diagnosis of sarcoidosis: A meta-analysis,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 129, no. 13, pp. 1607–1615, 2016.

A. A. Aragaki-Nakahodo, R. P. Baughman, R. T. Shipley, and S. Benzaquen, “The complimentary role of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy and endobronchial ultrasound fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 131, pp. 65–69, 2017.

V. Muthu, N. Gupta, S. Dhooria et al., “A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing the diagnostic yield of 21- and 22-gauge aspiration needles for performing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in sarcoidosis: To the editor,” CHEST, vol. 149, no. 4, pp. 1111–1113, 2016.

A. Balwan, “Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration using 19-G needle for sarcoidosis,” Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 260–263, 2018.

H. Zhang, G. Wang, W. Zhang et al., “Diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in pulmonary sarcoidosis,” Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 774–777, 2014.

J. Sun, H. Yang, J. Teng et al., “Determining factors in diagnosing pulmonary sarcoidosis by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 441–445, 2015.

A. Bugalho and A. Szlubowski, “Endobronchial ultrasound in sarcoidosis: Time to rethink the diagnostic strategy?” Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 235-236, 2014.

American Thoracic Society and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis in adults and children,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 161, no. 4, pp. 1376–1395, 2002.

D. P. Steinfort, D. F. Johnson, T. G. Connell, and L. B. Irving, “Endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy in the evaluation of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in suspected tuberculosis: A minimally invasive technique with a high diagnostic yield,” Infection, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 309–311, 2009.

J. Lyu, C. K. Kim, M. Kim et al., “Transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis confirmed by endobronchial ultrasound biopsy of a mediastinal lymph node and dna fingerprinting analysis,” Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 345–347, 2010.

S. Ren, Z. Zhang, H. Jiang et al., “Combination of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with standard bronchoscopic techniques enhanced the diagnosis yields of pulmonary tuberculosis patients with lymphadenopathy,” Panminerva Medica, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 363–370, 2013.

J. Sun, J. Teng, H. Yang et al., “Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing intrathoracic tuberculosis,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 2021–2027, 2013.

A. Senturk, E. Arguder, H. Hezer et al., “Rapid diagnosis of mediastinal tuberculosis with polymerase chain reaction evaluation of aspirated material taken by endobronchial ultrasoundyguided transbronchial needle aspiration,” Journal of Investigative Medicine, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 885–889, 2014.

W. Ye, R. Zhang, X. Xu, Y. Liu, and K. Ying, “Diagnostic efficacy and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in intrathoracic tuberculosis: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1645–1650, 2015.

R. Chalela, A. Sánchez-Font, M. Domínguez-Álvarez, D. Badenes-Bonet, L. Pijuan, and V. Curull, “Role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of mediastinal tuberculosis,” Medicina Clínica (English Edition), vol. 146, no. 12, pp. 532–535, 2016.

A. Sodhi, R. Supakul, G. W. Williams et al., “Role of transbronchial needle aspiration (conventional and ebus guided) in the diagnosis of histoplasmosis in patients presenting with mediastinal lymphadenopathy,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 2017.

K. v. L. Egressy, M. Mohammed, and J. S. Ferguson, “The Use of endobronchial ultrasound in the diagnosis of subacute pulmonary histoplasmosis,” Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, vol. 2015, Article ID 510863, 6 pages, 2015.

V. Nair, R. K. Sharma, A. Khanna, and D. Talwar, “Pulmonary mucormycosis diagnosed by convex probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of cavity wall,” Lung India, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 179–181, 2017.

R. A. Shah, J. J. Vempilly, S. M. N. U. Husnain, and P. Hegde, “Combined endosonography reduces time to diagnose pulmonary coccidioidomycosis,” Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 152–155, 2018.

O. Usluer and S. O. R. Kaya, “Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal lymphadenopathy: effect of the learning curve,” Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 693–695, 2014.

H. M. Ko, G. Da Cunha Santos, G. Darling et al., “Diagnosis and subclassification of lymphomas and non-neoplastic lesions involving mediastinal lymph nodes using endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1023–1030, 2013.

Y. Fujikura, Y. Kouzaki, S. Ohta et al., “A case of Nocardia asteroides infection in a patient with HIV/AIDS diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA),” Internal Medicine, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1413–1417, 2012.

A. Aragaki-Nakahodo, S. Benzaquen, and M. Kirschner, “Coinfection by Nocardia beijingensis and Nocardia arthritidis in an immunocompromised patient diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA),” Respiratory Medicine Case Reports, vol. 12, pp. 22-23, 2014.

G. L. Casoni, C. Gurioli, M. Romagnoli, and V. Poletti, “Diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism with endobronchial ultrasound,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1416-1417, 2008.

J. Aumiller, F. J. F. Herth, M. Krasnik, and R. Eberhardt, “Endobronchial ultrasound for detecting central pulmonary emboli: a pilot study,” Respiration, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 298–302, 2009.

O. Le Rouzic, G. Terce, C. Jardin et al., “Pulmonary embolism diagnosed during an endobronchial ultrasound procedure,” Revue des Maladies Respiratoires, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 775–777, 2010.

E. Çetinkaya, A. Yilmaz, A. Özgül, S. Onur, A. Gençoǧlu, and S. Altin, “A case of pulmonary embolism confirmed by endobronchial ultrasound,” Tüberküloz ve Toraks, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 318–320, 2011.

H. G. Colt, M. Davoudi, and S. Murgu, “Scientific evidence and principles for the use of endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration,” Expert Review of Medical Devices, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 493–513, 2011.

C. J. Egea Santaolalla, F. J. Ribas Solis, and M. Juste Carne, “Pulmonary thromboembolism observed by endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS),” Archivos de Bronconeumología, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 164-165, 2011.

J. Sanz-Santos, F. Andreo, I. García-Olivé, J. Remón, and E. Monsó, “Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism by endobronchial ultrasound as an incidental finding,” Respiration, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 150-151, 2011.

M. A. Swartz and C. T. Gillespie, “Pulmonary emboli detected by endobronchial ultrasound,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 183, no. 11, p. 1569, 2011.

O. F. Erer, P. Cimen, M. Unlu, and N. Katgi, “Four cases of pulmonary thromboembolism diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 441–444, 2017.

M. Chalhoub and K. Harris, “The use of endobronchial ultrasonography with transbronchial needle aspiration to sample a solitary substernal thyroid nodule,” CHEST, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 1435-1436, 2010.

A. Sánchez-Font, S. Peralta, and V. Curull, “Thyroid cyst diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in a patient with lung cancer,” Archivos de Bronconeumología, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 38-39, 2013.

R. F. Casal, M. N. Phan, K. Keshava et al., “The use of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of thyroid lesions,” BMC Endocrine Disorders, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 88, 2014.

A. Ozturk, T. Cicek, Z. Aktas, F. Demirag, and A. Yilmaz, “Mediastinal ectopic thyroid diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Report of three cases,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 299–301, 2018.

F. Al-Saffar, S. Ibrahim, V. Seeram, A. A. Bajwa, and A. Shujaat, “Use of endobronchial ultrasound to evaluate nonthrombotic endovascular lesions in pulmonary arteries: A systematic review,” Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 28–32, 2015.

A. Casutt, A. Koutsokera, N. Peguret, and A. Lovis, “Linear-endobronchial ultrasound-guided insertion of a fiducial marker: a new tool for tracking central lesions,” Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 166–169, 2017.

B. J. Seides, J. P. Egan, K. D. French, K. L. Kovitz, and N. R. Desai, “Fiducial marker placement for stereotactic body radiation therapy via convex probe endobronchial ultrasound: A case series and review of literature,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1972–1983, 2018.

D. P. Harley, W. S. Krimsky, S. Sarkar, D. Highfield, C. Aygun, and B. Gurses, “Fiducial marker placement using endobronchial ultrasound and navigational bronchoscopy for stereotactic radiosurgery: an alternative strategy,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 368–374, 2010.

F. Khan, C. J. Anker, G. Garrison, and C. Matthew Kinsey, “Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle injection for local control of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer,” Annals of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 101–104, 2015.

X. Li, X. Liu, X. Rao, J. Zhao, Y. Xu, and M. Xie, “A case report of local treatment of inoperable squamous cell lung carcinoma with convex-probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided intratumoral injection of cisplatin in a patient with severe COPD,” Medicine (United States), vol. 96, no. 24, Article ID e7070, 2017.

M. S. Parikh, E. Seeley, E. Nguyen-Tran, and G. Krishna, “Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle injection of liposomal amphotericin b for the treatment of symptomatic aspergilloma,” Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 330–333, 2017.

T. Nakajima, K. Yasufuku, K. Shibuya, and T. Fujisawa, “Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for the treatment of central airway stenosis caused by a mediastinal cyst,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 538–540, 2007.

R. F. Casal, C. A. Jimenez, R. J. Mehran et al., “Infected mediastinal bronchogenic cyst successfully treated by endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. e52–e53, 2010.

H. S. Bukamur, E. Alkhankan, H. M. Mezughi, N. J. Munn, and Y. R. Shweihat, “The role and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis and management of infected bronchogenic mediastinal cysts in adults,” Respiratory Medicine Case Reports, vol. 24, pp. 46–49, 2018.

P. Li, W. Zheng, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, and L. I. Zhao, “Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for thyroid cyst therapy: A case report,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1944–1947, 2017.

B. A. Jalil, K. Yasufuku, and A. M. Khan, “Uses, limitations, and complications of endobronchial ultrasound,” Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 325–330, 2015.

F. Asano, M. Aoe, Y. Ohsaki et al., “Complications associated with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a nationwide survey by the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy,” Respiratory Research, vol. 14, no. 1, article 50, 2013.