PPAR Research
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 1932036, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1932036

Clinical Study

PPARG2 Pro12Ala and TNFα -308G>A Polymorphisms Are Not Associated with Heart Failure Development in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Izabela Wojtkowska,¹ Tomasz A. Bonda,² Andrzej Tysarowski,³ Katarzyna Seliga,³ Janusz A. Siedlecki,³ Maria M. Winnicka,² and Janina Stępińska¹

¹Institute of Cardiology, Intensive Cardiac Therapy Clinic, Alpejska St., 04-628 Warsaw, Poland
²Medical University of Bialystok, Department of General and Experimental Pathology, Mickiewicza 2c, 15-222 Bialystok, Poland
³Institute of Oncology, Department of Molecular and Translational Oncology, Wawelska 15B St., 02-034 Warsaw, Poland

Correspondence should be addressed to Izabela Wojtkowska; izabelawojt@op.pl

Received 31 December 2018; Revised 31 March 2019; Accepted 11 April 2019; Published 2 June 2019

Academic Editor: Swasti Tiwari

Copyright © 2019 Izabela Wojtkowska et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

TNFα and PPARγ are important modulators of metabolism, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of heart failure (HF). The aim of the study was to assess whether polymorphisms of the TNFα (-308G>A) and PPARG2 (Pro12Ala) genes are associated with the risk of developing HF by patients with ischemic heart disease. Methods. 122 patients without HF (aged 63 ± 8.8 years, 85% males) with confirmed coronary artery disease qualified for coronary bypass grafting were enrolled in the study. After the procedure, they were screened for cardiac parameters. Those with elevated NT-proBNP or diminished left ventricular ejection fraction during follow-up were assigned to the HF group (n=78), and the remaining ones to the non-HF group (n=44). The TNFα -308G>A and PPARG2 Pro12Ala polymorphisms were detected using the TaqMan method. Results. The distributions of TNFα -308G>A and PPARG2 Pro12Ala did not differ between the HF and non-HF groups (-308G>A: 16% vs. 11.4% of alleles; Pro12Ala: 23.9% vs. 20.5% of alleles, respectively). IL-6 concentration in the plasma of TNFα A-allele carriers at months 1 and 12 after CABG was higher in the HF group compared to the non-HF group (1 month after CABG: 5.3 ± 3.4 vs. 3.1 ± 2.9, p<0.05; 12 months after CABG: 4.2 ± 3,9 vs. 1.4 ± 1.2, p<0.01, respectively). Both polymorphisms were not related to changes in the plasma TNFα concentration or other parameters related to HF. Conclusions. Our study did not reveal any correlation between the PPARG2 Pro12Ala and TNFα -308G>A polymorphisms and development of HF in patients with ischemic heart disease after coronary bypass grafting.

1. Introduction

Coronary heart disease (CHD) plays a critical role in the development of heart failure (HF). Nearly two-thirds of HF cases are attributed to underlying coronary artery atherosclerosis. An important aim of the CHD treatment is to prevent HF-associated morbidity and mortality. Progression of atherosclerosis is the main reason for development of CHD and is influenced by numerous factors such as high plasma LDL cholesterol concentration, blood glucose level, inflammation, and oxidative stress [1]. Many of the above factors have proven to be closely related to the polymorphisms of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gene [2]. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the link between PPAR gene polymorphisms, including PPARA intron 7G/C, PPARD +294T/C, PPARG2 Pro12Ala and C161T, and CHD risk [3–8], but data from these single studies have not provided consistent results. The data may not have sufficient statistical power to reveal relatively weak dependencies or allow analyses in specific populations. Moreover, meta-analyses including large populations have not provided any clear evidence for association between PPAR polymorphisms and coronary artery disease [9–11]. The most frequent PPARG2 polymorphism in Caucasian population (about 25%) is the Pro12Ala polymorphism in which cytosine is exchanged for guanine in codon 12, resulting in proline substitution by alanine in the PPARγ protein [2]. This change has been reported to reduce the transcription of target genes, including genes regulating inflammation, and may be related to reduced synthesis of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) [2, 12, 13]. The PPARG2 gene is expressed mainly in the adipose tissue and thus may influence fatty acid turnover and cytokine release from adipocytes. PPARG2 expression has also been found in atherosclerotic lesions and macrophages, suggesting that PPARG2 may influence atherogenic processes [14, 15]. TNFα and PPARγ are able to influence the myocardium through regulation of inflammatory cytokine release and metabolic modulation. However, their effect on the progression of HF is unclear.

The aim of the presented study was to determine a link between the polymorphisms (-308G>A (rs1800629) in TNFα and Pro12Ala (rs1801282) in PPARG2) and development of HF in patients with ischemic heart disease subjected to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).

2. Methods

Patients qualified for surgical treatment of coronary artery disease and without HF manifestations were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent coronary angiography confirming significant atherosclerotic lesions in the coronary arteries. Fifty-one patients (42%) had a history of myocardial infarction. Only patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in echocardiography and normal NT-proBNP were included, while patients with diabetes mellitus and valvular heart disease were excluded from the study. The protocol for patient qualification and follow-up was the same as described in our previous papers [16, 17].

The clinical status, biochemical tests, resting transthoracic echocardiography, and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were performed before CABG and at 3 time points during the follow-up: 1, 12, and 24 months after the procedure. Patients who had elevated NT-proBNP (>400 pg/ml) or decreased LVEF (< 40%) during follow-up visits were assigned to the HF group, while patients without NT-proBNP elevation or LVEF decrease were assigned to the control (non-HF) group.

Blood samples were drawn at baseline and during each follow-up evaluation. Serum concentrations of IL-6 and TNFα were measured using solid-phase sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (HS600B, R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.

Genomic DNA was isolated from blood leukocytes. Genotyping evaluating the TNFα -308G>A (rs1800629) and PPARG2 Pro12Ala (rs1801282) polymorphisms was performed with TaqMan probes using the Abi Prism 7500 Fast apparatus (Applied Biosystems).

2.1. Ethics Statement

The procedures followed in the study were conducted ethically according to the principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research. All procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Regional Medical Chamber in Warsaw [IK NP-0021/13/998/2007]. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

2.2. Statistics

Data was presented as mean ± SD for quantitative variables or percent of study group for qualitative variables. Specific parameters of both groups and changes in parameter values during follow-up were compared using chi-square test and one- and two-way ANOVA with post hoc tests. Chi-square test was used for evaluation of allele distribution in both groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis was performed using Statistica 12 (StatSoft, Inc. 2014).

3. Results

A total of 122 Caucasian patients (aged 63 ± 8.8 years, 85% males) were qualified to the study. During post-CABG follow-up, the criteria for diagnosing HF were fulfilled in 78 patients (HF group), while the remaining 44 were assigned to the non-HF group. Demographic and initial clinical characteristics of the study groups are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Initial characteristics of the investigated groups.

HF
Non-HF
P

(n=78)
(n=44)

Age (y)
65.1 ± 8.4
59.6 ± 8.7
NS

BMI (kg/m²)
27.0 ± 3.5
27.9 ± 3.4
NS

Smokers
16 (20%)
4 (9%)
NS

Hypertension
48 (62%)
28 (63%)
NS

History of MI
35 (45%)
15 (35%)
NS

Systolic BP (mmHg)
132.2 ± 12.3
127.7 ± 9.0
0.035

Diastolic BP (mmHg)
79.5 ± 5.0
79.2 ± 4.70
NS

LVEDV (cm)
5.2 ± 0.3
5.1 ± 0.8
NS

LV EF (%)
59 ± 4.5
59 ± 3.5
NS

6-MWT (m)
405 ± 62
446 ± 63
0.0007

Blood count:

    RBC
4.3 ± 0.7
4.58 ± 0.6
0.031

    HGB
13.3 ± 2.0
14 ± 1.9
NS

    HCT
38.6 ± 5.8
40.32 ± 5.3
NS

    WBC
7.9 ± 3.0
7.42 ± 2.5
NS

    PLT
192.8 ± 59.9
186.64 ± 46.5
NS

Electrolytes:

    Na (mmol/L)
139.8 ± 14.7
141.8 ± 2.8
NS

    K (mmol/L)
4.5 ± 0.4
4.5 ± 0.4
NS

CRP (mg/L)
7.1 ± 8.1
6.6 ± 9.0
NS

TNF (pg/mL)
3.3 ± 3.9
2.6 ± 3.8
NS

IL-6 (pg/mL)
9.4 ± 5.4
8.6 ± 6.0
NS

NT-proBNP (pg/mL)
212.4 ± 101
198.3 ± 111
NS

eGFR (mL/min/1.73m²)
74 ± 13.1
77.4 ± 11.0
NS

Total cholesterol (mmol/L)
4.1 ± 0.9
4.0 ± 0.8
NS

LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L)
2.2 ± 0.8
2.2 ± 0.7
NS

HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L)
1.4 ± 0.3
1.2 ± 0.3
0.016

Triglycerides (mmol/L)
1.3 ± 0.6
1.4 ± 0.6
NS

Medications:

    Aspirin
100%
100%
NS

    Beta-blockers
100%
100%
NS

    ACE-I
91%
93%
NS

    ARB
7 %
0 %
NS

    Aldosterone antagonists
11 %
0 %
0.007

    Diuretics
19 %
9 %
NS

    Statins
99 %
98%
NS

The distribution of the SNP alleles of TNFα and PPARG2 was comparable in the HF and non-HF groups (Table 2). The plasma levels of TNFα and IL-6 were not related to the PPARG2 or TNF polymorphisms before CABG and during follow-up. The profiles of plasma levels of TNFα and IL-6 were not significantly different between the HF and non-HF groups at each individual follow-up step. In both groups, no influence of the TNFα or PPARG2 genotype on the levels of TNFα was found (Figure 1). IL-6 concentration in the plasma of TNFα A-allele carriers at months 1 and 12 after CABG was higher in the HF group compared to the non-HF group (1 month after CABG: 5.3 ± 3.4 vs. 3.1 ± 2.9, p<0.05; 12 months after CABG: 4.2 ± 3,9 vs. 1.4 ± 1.2, p<0.01, respectively) (Figure 2). Plasma IL-6 concentration was higher before CABG, subsequently decreased one month after the procedure, and remained at a stable level in both the HF and non-HF groups irrespective of the TNFα and PPARG2 genotype (p<0.05; Figure 2).

Table 2: Allele distribution in the heart failure (HF) and non-heart failure (Non-HF) groups.   test.

HF (78)
Non-HF (44)
P value

PPARG2 Pro12Ala
CC (ProPro)
48 (61.5%)
25 (57%)

CG (ProAla)
28 (35.9%)
17 (38.9%)

GG (AlaAla)
2 (2.6%)
2 (4.6%)

C allele %
79.5
76.1
NS

G allele %
20.5
23.9

TNF -308G/A
GG
56 (71.8%)
34 (77.3%)

GA
19 (24.4%)
10 (22.7%)

AA
3 (3.8%)
0

G allele %
84
88.6
NS

A allele %
16
11.4

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: Plasma TNFα (panel (a)) and IL-6 (panel (b)) concentrations in the HF (upper graphs) and non-HF (lower graphs) groups in relation to the presence of specific alleles of TNF (position -308): G is the dominating isoform. There were only 3 AA homozygotes; thus AA were grouped together with GA into one “A-allele” subgroup, while the “G-allele” subgroup contained GG homozygotes only. Plasma TNFα concentrations were not statistically different between the HF and non-HF groups and were not affected by the TNF-308 polymorphism. IL-6 was significantly higher at baseline in both groups (# p<0.001 vs. follow-up results in the same subgroup). IL-6 levels were higher in the HF carriers of A-allele at 1-month and 12-month follow-up visits compared to the non-HF carriers of A-allele (panel (b) black bars; p<0.05, p<0.01). Bars represent mean, and whiskers represent SEM.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: Plasma TNFα (panel (a)) and IL-6 (panel (b)) concentrations in the HF (upper graphs) and non-HF (lower graphs) groups in relation to the presence of specific alleles of PPAR Pro12Ala. The ProPro subgroup contains homozygotes with dominating isoform, while the Ala subgroup includes carriers of the mutated Ala allele: AlaAla homozygotes and ProAla heterozygotes. There were no differences in the cytokine profiles between the C-allele (Ala) and G-allele (Pro) subgroups in either the HF or the non-HF group. Baseline IL-6 levels were higher than follow-up measurements in all subgroups (# p<0.05 vs. remaining values in the same group and genotype). Bars represent mean, and whiskers represent SEM.

In both groups, the TNFα polymorphism was not significantly correlated with any clinical or other biochemical parameters. PPARG2 Ala was related to a longer distance in the 6-minute walk test, but only in patients of the HF group before and 1 month after CABG (424 ± 62 m in PPARG2 Ala vs. 394 ± 59 m in PPARG2 ProPro before CABG, p=0.025, and 417 ± 100 m vs. 383.4 ± 84 m, p=0.01, respectively). Other clinical and laboratory parameters were not related to the PPARG2 allele.

4. Discussion

Our results suggest a lack of significant relationship between the TNFα -308G>A and PPARG2 Pro12Ala polymorphisms and development of HF after CABG. The TNFα A-allele has been shown to promote expression of TNFα; however, in human studies, it has not been associated with significantly higher concentrations of TNFα in blood [18–21]. The presence of the A-allele has been correlated with inflammatory processes, higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and development of metabolic syndrome, but in clinical observations this effect is very often lost due to multiple confounding factors [21–23]. As shown by a recent meta-analysis, A-allele carriers are more susceptible to developing ischemic heart disease [24]; however, there are also reports describing a protective role of this polymorphism. We observed a similar distribution of both G and A alleles of TNFα in the HF and non-HF groups. CRP levels did not differ between the carriers of the above alleles, and plasma TNFα levels were similar between the AA+AG and GG carriers. We found that patients with HF carrying the A-allele had significantly higher plasma IL-6 concentrations than A-allele carriers of the non-HF group. This may reflect a link between the proinflammatory IL-6 and this genetic variant of TNFα in patients with reduced cardiac function, even though this effect seems to be insignificant from the clinical point of view.

Association between the PPARG2 Pro12Ala polymorphism and development of HF has not been described previously, but has been investigated for its association with the development of atherosclerosis, including coronary atherosclerosis. In the Caucasian population of A homozygotes, a significantly increased risk of coronary artery disease has been reported [10].

The single nucleotide polymorphism (C>G) in codon 12 of exon B of the PPARG2 gene results in proline substitution by alanine in the PPARγ protein, which is responsible for a reduced binding activity of PPARγ to the cognate promoter element and a reduced ability to transactivate responsive promoters [25]. The presence of the Ala allele has been linked to increased sensitivity to insulin and reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus, most probably resulting from changes in the adipocyte function, which is characterized by suppression of lipolysis and release of free fatty acids, as well as secondarily improved glucose utilization by muscles [2, 26]. PPARG2 is expressed in the adipose tissue; thus the hypothetical consequences of the Pro12Ala polymorphism for the myocardium seem to be indirect, related to changes in lipid turnover and adipokine release [27], or attributed to the development of coronary atherosclerosis. Our study was conducted in a population with significant stenoses in the epicardial coronary arteries, and none of the patients had reduced systolic function of the left ventricle before the procedure. Moreover, the BMI of both study groups was at the same level; thus we presumed that the PPARG2 polymorphism should exert its effect not through an ischemic mechanism, but through endo/paracrine signaling engaging adipokines. We examined the profiles of TNFα and IL-6—the two adipokines involved in the pathogenesis of HF—but we did not find any difference in the TNFα and IL-6 levels between the dominant PPARG2 ProPro genotype and Ala carriers before CABG or during follow-up. In patients with HF, the Ala allele was associated with a longer distance in the 6-minute walk test. Previous reports have linked the Ala allele with the development of more effective short-term anaerobic muscle performance and strength [28], but since no difference between the genotypes was present in the non-HF group, it should not be explained by the PPARG2 Pro12Ala polymorphism.

We did not find correlations between the PPARG2 Pro12Ala and TNFα -308G>A polymorphisms and development of HF in patients with ischemic heart disease after coronary bypass grafting.

Data Availability

The source data (table containing the clinical parameters, concentrations of TNFα and IL-6, and results of the polymorphisms) are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional Points

Study Limitations. A significant number of patients was lost during follow-up: 8 (6.5%) patients 12 months after CABG and 40 (32%) after two years.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the research grant NN 402 177934 from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Warsaw, Poland.

References

R. Ross, “Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 1999.

M. Stumvoll and H. Häring, “The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2 Pro12Ala polymorphism,” Diabetes, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2341–2347, 2002.

XL. Wang, J. Oosterhof, and N. Duarte, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma C161→T polymorphism and coronary artery disease,” in Cardiovascular Research, vol. 44, pp. 588–594, 1999.

J. Skogsberg, A. D. McMahon, F. Karpe, A. Hamsten, C. J. Packard, and E. Ehrenborg, “Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta genotype in relation to cardiovascular risk factors and risk of coronary heart disease in hypercholesterolaemic men,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 254, no. 6, pp. 597–604, 2003.

D. M. Flavell, Y. Jamshidi, E. Hawe et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha gene variants influence progression of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of coronary artery disease,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 1440–1445, 2002.

M. Blüher, T. Klemm, T. Gerike, H. Krankenberg, G. Schuler, and R. Paschke, “Lack of association between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma-2 gene variants and the occurrence of coronary heart disease in patients with diabetes mellitus,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 545–551, 2002.

U. Vogel, S. Segel, C. Dethlefsen et al., “PPARgamma Pro12Ala polymorphism and risk of acute coronary syndrome in a prospective study of Danes,” BMC Medical Genetics, vol. 10, no. 52, 2009.

L. P. Wang, L. R. Zhao, H. W. Cui, M. R. Yan, L. Yang, and X. L. Su, “Association between PPARgamma2 Pro12Ala polymorphism and myocardial infarction and obesity in Han Chinese in Hohhot, China,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2929–2938, 2012.

W. Xu, J. Xu, B. Sun et al., “The effect of PPARG gene polymorphisms on the risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 875–884, 2013.

Z. Wu, Y. Lou, W. Jin et al., “The Pro12Ala polymorphism in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-2 gene (PPARgamma2) is associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 12, Article ID e53105, 2012.

Z. Wu, Y. Lou, W. Jin, Y. Liu, L. Lu, and G. Lu, “The C161T polymorphism in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene (PPARgamma) is associated with risk of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 3101–3112, 2013.

Y. Zhang, X. Yang, F. Bian et al., “TNF-alpha promotes early atherosclerosis by increasing transcytosis of LDL across endothelial cells: crosstalk between NF-kappaB and PPAR-gamma,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 72, pp. 85–94, 2014.

Q. Yao, L. Nordfors, J. Axelsson et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma polymorphisms affect systemic inflammation and survival in end-stage renal disease patients starting renal replacement therapy,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 182, pp. 105–111, 2005.

R. Kursawe, V. D. Dixit, P. E. Scherer et al., “A role of the inflammasome in the low storage capacity of the abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue in obese adolescents,” Diabetes, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 610–618, 2016.

N. Marx, G. Sukhova, C. Murphy, P. Libby, and J. Plutzky, “Macrophages in human atheroma contain PPARgamma: differentiation-dependent peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma(PPARgamma) expression and reduction of MMP-9 activity through PPARgamma activation in mononuclear phagocytes in vitro,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 1998.

I. Wojtkowska, A. Tysarowski, K. Seliga et al., “PPAR gamma expression levels during development of heart failure in patients with coronary artery disease after coronary artery bypass-grafting,” PPAR Research, vol. 2014, Article ID 242790, 5 pages, 2014.

I. Wojtkowska, T. A. Bonda, J. Wolszakiewicz et al., “Myocardial expression of ppargamma and exercise capacity in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery,” PPAR Research, vol. 2017, Article ID 1924907, 7 pages, 2017.

J.-P. Mira, A. Cariou, F. Grall et al., “Association of TNF2, a TNF-α promoter polymorphism, with septic shock susceptibility and mortality: a multicenter study,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 282, no. 6, pp. 561–568, 1999.

P. Nejati, S. Naeimipour, A. Salehi, and M. Shahbazi, “Association of tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene promoter polymorphism and its mRNA expression level in coronary artery disease,” Meta Gene, vol. 18, pp. 122–126, 2018.

A. H. Hajeer and I. V. Hutchinson, “nfluence of TNFalpha gene polymorphisms on TNFalpha production and disease,” Human Immunology, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1191–1199, 2001.

M. Galiñanes, M. James, V. Codd, A. Baxi, and L. Hadjinikolaou, “TNF-alpha gene promoter polymorphism at nucleotide -308 and the inflammatory response and oxidative stress induced by cardiac surgery: role of heart failure and medical treatment,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 332–337, 2008.

S. C. Sookoian, C. González, and C. J. Pirola, “Meta-analysis on the G-308A tumor necrosis factor alpha gene variant and phenotypes associated with the metabolic syndrome,” Obesity Research, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2122–2131, 2005.

H. Lakka, T. A. Lakka, T. Rankinen et al., “The TNF-alpha G-308A polymorphism is associated with C-reactive protein levels: the HERITAGE Family Study,” Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 377–383, 2006.

P. Zhang, X. Wu, G. Li et al., “Tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Medicine, vol. 96, no. 14, Article ID e6569, 2017.

S. S. Deeb, L. Fajas, M. Nemoto et al., “A Pro12Ala substitution in PPARgamma2 associated with decreased receptor activity, lower body mass index and improved insulin sensitivity,” Nature Genetics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 284–287, 1998.

T. Yamauchi, J. Kamon, H. Waki et al., “The mechanisms by which both heterozygous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) deficiency and PPARgamma agonist improve insulin resistance,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 44, pp. 41245–41254, 2001.

R. Marfella, K. Esposito, M. Siniscalchi et al., “Effect of weight loss on cardiac synchronization and proinflammatory cytokines in premenopausal obese women,” Diabetes Care, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2004.

A. Maciejewska-Karlowska, M. Sawczuk, P. Cieszczyk, A. Zarebska, and S. Sawczyn, “Association between the Pro12Ala polymorphism of the peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor gamma gene and strength athlete status,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e67172, 2013.