Plastic Surgery InternationalVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 303247, 6 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/303247

Clinical Study

The Versatility of Perforator-Based Propeller Flap for Reconstruction of Distal Leg and Ankle Defects

Durga Karki and R. P. Narayan

Department of Plastic, Burns & Maxillofacial Surgery, V.M. Medical College & Safdarjang Hospital, Delhi 110029, India

Received 6 December 2011; Accepted 23 January 2012

Academic Editor: Yoshihiro Kimata

Copyright © 2012 Durga Karki and R. P. Narayan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Introduction. Soft tissue coverage of distal leg and ankle region represents a challenge and such defect usually requires a free flap. However, this may lead to considerable donor site morbidity, is time consuming, and needs facility of microsurgery. With the introduction of perforator flap, management of small- and medium-size defects of distal leg and ankle region is convenient, less time consuming, and with minimal donor site morbidity. When local perforator flap is designed as propeller and rotated to 180 degree, donor site is closed primarily and increases reach of flap, thus increasing versatility. Material and Methods. From June 2008 to May 2011, 20 patients were treated with perforator-based propeller flap for distal leg and ankle defects. Flap was based on single perforator of posterior tibial and peroneal artery rotated to 180 degrees. Defect size was from 4 cm × 3.5 cm to 7 cm × 5 cm. Results. One patient developed partial flap necrosis, which was managed with skin grafting. Two patients developed venous congestion, which subsided spontaneously without complications. Small wound dehiscence was present in one patient. Donor site was closed primarily in all patients. Rest of the flaps survived well with good aesthetic results. Conclusion. The perforator-based propeller flap for distal leg and ankle defects is a good option. This flap design is safe and reliable in achieving goals of reconstruction. The technique is convenient, less time consuming, and with minimal donor site morbidity. It provides aesthetically good result.

1. Introduction

Soft tissue reconstruction of ankle region is difficult and challenging. Due to limited mobility and availability of overlying skin, even a small defect in the distal leg and ankle region may require a microsurgical reconstruction. Random pattern flap are limited in size and mobility [1]. Local fasciocutaneous flaps with limited availability in distal leg resulted in donor site that always require skin grafting. Free microvascular transfer leads to considerable donor site morbidity, is time consuming, and requires expensive microsurgical facility.

The field of reconstructive surgery has taken a significant leap forward with the introduction of perforator flaps. This has been made possible with the development of knowledge in vascular anatomy and cutaneous circulation [2, 3].

According to the Gent consensus, perforator flaps are composed of skin and subcutaneous fat nourished by perforators rising from deep vascular systems, which reach the surface by passing mostly through muscle and intramuscular septa [4]. Advantage of perforator flaps is that they are safe, reliable, and with minimal donor site morbidity. A Propeller flap has additional advantage of wider mobilization and rotation so as to increase reach of local flap and their versatility. This technique can be performed expeditiously and is beneficial in themanagement of multiple injured, systemically compromised and elderly patients.

The propeller flap was first described in 1991 by Hyakusoku et al., as a fasciocutaneous flap rotated 90 degree to cover defects resulted from release of postburn contracture in cubital and axillary area [5].

Propeller flap was used earlier to reconstruct leg defects [6–10].

In this study, the experience with perforator-based propeller flap based on posterior tibial and peroneal artery is reported. The flap was rotated to 180 degree to cover the defect on ankle region and donor site is primarily closed.

2. Materials and Methods

From June 2008 to May 2011, 20 patients were treated with perforator-based propeller flap for distal leg and ankle defects (Table 1). All were male. Mean age was 38.2 years. One patient had diabetes mellitus. All defects were posttraumatic due to road traffic accidents. One patient had diabetes mellitus, no history of other comorbid conditions. Ten patients presented with medial malleolar soft-tissue defect, seven lateral malleolar defect, one anteromedial lower tibial defect and two patients presented with defect over anterior aspect of lower tibia. Size of defects ranged from .5 to  cm. The flaps were based on posterior tibial artery in 14 patients and peroneal artery in 6 patients. All flaps were islanded on a single perforator. The perforator-based propeller flap used in our series is a “skeletonised perforator flap.” I found constant perforator of posterior Tibial artery 9-10 cm above the medial malleolus in 12 out of 14 cases.

Table 1: Patient summary.

Patient
Age (yrs)/sex
Location of defect
Defect size (cm)
Perforator source vessel
Followup (months)
Complications

1
22/M
Lateral malleolus

Peroneal
15
None

2
16/M
Lateral malleolus

Peroneal
11
None

3
18/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
2
Transient venous

congestion

4
38/M
Anterior lower tibia

Post. tibial
4
None

5
40/M
Lateral malleolus

Peroneal
10
Partial flap

necrosis

6
70/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
6
None

7
52/M
Anterior lower tibia

Post. tibial
18
None

8
36/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
18
None

9
46/M
Antero medial

Post. tibial
7
None

lower tibia

10
40/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
2
Marginal wound

Diabetic
dehiscence

11
22/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
12
None

12
36/M
Lateral malleolus

Peroneal
24
None

13
55/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
10
Transient venous

congestion

14
26/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
8
None

15
38/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
10
None

16
40/M
Lateral malleolus

Peroneal
14
None

17
51/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
16
None

18
34/M
Lateral malleolus

Peroneal
5
None

19
27/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
18
None

20
56/M
Medial malleolus

Post. tibial
12
None

2.1. Flap Design

Concept of propeller flap corresponds to 2 blades of propeller of unequal length and perforator forming the pivot point. When 2 blades rotated, the long blade fills the defect. The distance between proximal tip of the flap and the perforator should be equal to the distance between the perforator and the distal limit of the defect with 1 cm added to prevent tension in the flap.

2.2. Surgical Technique

Preoperatively perforators near the defect were marked with the help of hand-held Doppler probe. The patient is positioned supine. The flap was drawn adjacent to the defect around the perforator. Design of the flap is described above. A tourniquet is inflated without prior exsanguinated. This maneuver facilitates identification of perforators as they remain filled with the blood. All flaps were dissected under loop magnification. An exploratory incision is given along posterior margin of the flap. The dissection started in subfascial plane, keeping in mind expected site of perforator. Once suitable perforator was found, dimension of flap confirmed or changed to the extent, as required. Flap margins were then incised, so as to island it on selected perforator. Adequate release of all fascial strands around the perforator and dissection around the perforator in intermuscular or intramuscular plane to gain additional length were then carried out. This will facilitate rotation of flap without kinking the perforator. After deflation of the tourniquet, hemostasis was performed and viability of flap was evaluated. Finally 180 degree rotation of the flap as a propeller into the defect was performed and position of the perforator was once again checked to avoid kinking. The flap is inset and sutured into the defect. Proximal donor area is partially covered with the distal flap, and rest is closed primarily which significantly reduced the donor site morbidity.

3. Results

Twenty patients with defect over ankle region were operated from June 2008 to May 2011. One patient developed partial flap necrosis, which was managed with skin grafting.

Two patients developed transient venous congestion, which subsided spontaneously without complications. Small marginal wound dehiscence was present in one patient, treated with small split skin graft. Donor site was closed primarily in all patients. Flaps were based on posterior tibial artery in fourteen patients and peroneal artery in six patients. All patients provided stable coverage of the defect with good contour and skin cover (Figures 1, 2, and 3).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 1: (a) Preoperative view of defect with exposed lower end tibia on anterior aspect of ankle region with scarring of surrounding area. Posterior tibial perforators marked and flap outlined. (b) Flap islanded on a single perforator. (c) Flap rotated at 90 degree. (d) Flap rotated at 180 degree and sutured to the defect. (e) Flap inset. (f) Result 18 months after surgery.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2: (a) Soft-tissue defect near lateral malleolus with peroneal tendons injury and infection. Surrounding skin is inflamed. Defect is marked. (b) Flap islanded on a single perforator and rotated to 90 degree. (c) Propeller flap completely rotated to 180 degree. (d) Flap inset preoperatively. (e) Postoperative result after 15 months.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 3: (a) Soft-tissue defect with exposed medial malleolus and implant. (b) Flap islanded around the perforator of posterior tibial artery. (c) Flap lifted up on a single perforator. (d) The propeller flap is rotated to 180 degree and placed over the defect. (e) Result after 2 months of surgery. Marginal dehiscence of wound over inferior part of defect managed with small split skin graft.

4. Discussion

Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects at the level of distal leg and ankle region remains a frequent and challenging problem for reconstructive surgeon.

There are many possible reconstructive options for this region like local flaps, distant flap and free flap. Local flap includes random pattern flaps, fasciocutaneous flaps, reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap [11], and muscle flap. Distant includes cross leg flap, and free flaps. Random pattern flaps have high incidence of failure. Free flap is costly with significant donor site morbidity and long operating time. This demands microsurgery facility and expertise [12–14]. Fasciocutaneous flap from the same leg to reconstruct defect around ankle region is less preferred due to its morbidity as donor area always requires skin graft and bulky dog ear, which is unappealing. Distally based superficial sural artery flap is a good alternative to reconstruct distal leg defects. The sural nerve is not important for vascularization of the distally based superficial sural artery flap and can be spared during flap elevation [15–17].

Muscle flap has a limited role to address the ankle defects with disadvantage of sacrifice of function [18–20].

The concept of perforator flaps has progressed with improvement in understanding of flap perfusion based on different studies of Taylor on angiosomes of the body. Perforator flap is based on a reliable vascular pedicle. Perforator flaps play an important role in reconstruction of different regions of the body [21–25]. Perforator flaps may be transposed, advanced in V-Y manner or rotated depending upon site of the defect.

A propeller perforator flap is more advantageous in gaining tension-free reach to the defect due to wider mobilization and rotation options. In all our patients, we used a flap design rotated to 180 degrees to cover ankle defects based on “propeller” principle [5, 19]. With 180 degree rotations, the distant reach of the flap is possible and reliable. Flaps were based on posterior tibial and peroneal artery. This perforator-based propeller flap has various advantages over conventional perforator flap. This flap design increases the reach of local perforator flaps, thus increasing their versatility. Proximal healthy tissue is transferred to the defect. This flap is found to be suitable in small-to-moderate size defects ( to cm) located in the ankle region. The morbidity of the donor site was minimized due to primary closure of donor site.

5. Conclusion

The perforator-based propeller flap adds viable options to armamentarium of reconstructive surgeons. This is a simple, versatile technique and is less time consuming with no donor site morbidity. It is ideal for reconstruction of small-to-medium size defects of distal leg and ankle region with good cosmetic, excellent colour, and thickness match. Disadvantages of these propellers flap have a limited role in large defects and variable location of the perforators.

References

O. Quaba and A. Quaba, “Pedicled perforator flaps for the lower limb,” Seminars in Plastic Surgery, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 103–111, 2006.

G. I. Taylor and W. R. Pan, “Angiosomes of the leg: anatomic study and clinical implications,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 599–616, 1998.

G. I. Taylor, “The angiosomes of the body and their supply to perforator flaps,” Clinics in Plastic Surgery, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 331–342, 2003.

P. N. Blondeel, K. H. I. Van Landuyt, S. J. M. Monstrey et al., “The Gent consensus on perforator flap terminology: preliminary definitions,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 1378–1382, 2003.

H. Hyakusoku, T. Yamamoto, and M. Fumiiri, “The propeller flap method,” British Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 53–54, 1991.

A. N. Rad, M. R. Christy, E. D. Rodriguez, P. Brazio, and G. D. Rosson, “The anterior tibialis artery perforator (atap) flap for traumatic knee and patella defects: clinical cases and anatomic study,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 210–216, 2010.

A. N. Rad, N. K. Singh, and G. D. Rosson, “Peroneal artery perforator-based propeller flap reconstruction of the lateral distal lower extremity after tumor extirpation: case report and literature review,” Microsurgery, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 663–670, 2008.

T. C. Teo, “Perforator flaps in lower limb reconstruction,” Cirugia Plastica Ibero-Latinoamericana, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 287–292, 2006.

C. Rubino, A. Figus, M. Mazzocchi, L. A. Dessy, and A. Martano, “The propeller flap for chronic osteomyelitis of the lower extremities: a case report,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. e401–e404, 2009.

F. Moscatiello, J. Masià, A. Carrera, J. A. Clavero, J. R. Larranaga, and G. Pons, “The ‘propeller’ distal anteromedial thigh perforator flap. Anatomic study and clinical applications,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 1323–1330, 2007.

S. Akhtar and A. Hameed, “Versatility of the sural fasciocutaneous flap in the coverage of lower third leg and hind foot defects,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 839–845, 2006.

C. Rainer, A. H. Schwabegger, T. Bauer et al., “Free flap reconstruction of the foot,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 595–607, 1999.

H. N. Langstein, D. W. Chang, M. J. Miller et al., “Limb salvage for soft-tissue malignancies of the foot: an evaluation of free-tissue transfer,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 152–159, 2002.

K. van Landuyt, M. Hamdi, P. Blondeel, and S. Monstrey, “The compound thoracodorsal perforator flap in the treatment of combined soft-tissue defects of sole and dorsum of the foot,” British Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 371–378, 2005.

A. Mojallal, C. Wong, C. Shipkov et al., “Vascular supply of the distally based superficial sural artery flap: surgical safe zones based on component analysis using three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 1240–1252, 2010.

H. Hyakusoku, H. Tonegawa, and M. Fumiiri, “Heel coverage with a T-shaped distally based Sural Island fasciocutaneous flap,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 872–876, 1994.

S. Aoki, K. Tanuma, I. Iwakiri et al., “Clinical and vascular anatomical study of distally based sural flap,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 73–78, 2008.

C. R. Hartrampf, M. Scheflan, and J. Bostwick, “The flexor digitorum brevis muscle island pedicle flap: a new dimension in heel reconstruction,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 264–270, 1980.

G. G. Hallock, “The propeller flap version of the adductor muscle perforator flap for coverage of ischial or trochanteric pressure sores,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 540–542, 2006.

G. G. Hallock, “Lower extremity muscle perforator flaps for lower extremity reconstruction,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 1123–1130, 2004.

M. Hamdi, K. Van Landuyt, B. de Frene, N. Roche, P. Blondeel, and S. Monstrey, “The versatility of the inter-costal artery perforator (ICAP) flaps,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 644–652, 2006.

M. Hamdi, K. Van Landuyt, S. Monstrey, and P. Blondeel, “Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: a new concept,” British Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 531–539, 2004.

A. J. Lyons, “Perforator flaps in head and neck surgery,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 199–207, 2006.

J. T. Kim, “Latissimus dorsi perforator flap,” Clinics in Plastic Surgery, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 403–431, 2003.

D. Karki and A. Singh, “The distally-based island ulnar artery perforator flap for wrist defects,” Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2007.