Stem Cells International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 8749751, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8749751

Research Article

Involvement of WNT Signaling in the Regulation of Gestational Age-Dependent Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Proliferation

Sota Iwatani,¹ Akemi Shono,¹ Makiko Yoshida,² Keiji Yamana,¹ Khin Kyae Mon Thwin,¹ Jumpei Kuroda,³ Daisuke Kurokawa,¹ Tsubasa Koda,⁴ Kosuke Nishida,¹ Toshihiko Ikuta,¹ Kazumichi Fujioka,¹ Masami Mizobuchi,⁵ Mariko Taniguchi-Ikeda,¹ Ichiro Morioka,¹ Kazumoto Iijima,¹ and Noriyuki Nishimura¹

¹Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe 6500017, Japan
²Department of Pathology, Kobe Children’s Hospital, Kobe 6500047, Japan
³Department of Neonatology, Tokyo Metropolitan Children’s Medical Center, Fuchu 1838561, Japan
⁴Department of Pediatrics, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya 6638181, Japan
⁵Department of Developmental Pediatrics, Shizuoka Children’s Hospital, Shizuoka 4208660, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Noriyuki Nishimura; nnishi@med.kobe-u.ac.jp

Received 17 April 2017; Revised 22 June 2017; Accepted 4 July 2017; Published 12 September 2017

Academic Editor: Zhaohui Ye

Copyright © 2017 Sota Iwatani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a heterogeneous cell population that is isolated initially from the bone marrow (BM) and subsequently almost all tissues including umbilical cord (UC). UC-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) have attracted an increasing attention as a source for cell therapy against various degenerative diseases due to their vigorous proliferation and differentiation. Although the cell proliferation and differentiation of BM-derived MSCs is known to decline with age, the functional difference between preterm and term UC-MSCs is poorly characterized. In the present study, we isolated UC-MSCs from 23 infants delivered at 22–40 weeks of gestation and analyzed their gene expression and cell proliferation. Microarray analysis revealed that global gene expression in preterm UC-MSCs was distinct from term UC-MSCs. WNT signaling impacts on a variety of tissue stem cell proliferation and differentiation, and its pathway genes were enriched in differentially expressed genes between preterm and term UC-MSCs. Cell proliferation of preterm UC-MSCs was significantly enhanced compared to term UC-MSCs and counteracted by WNT signaling inhibitor XAV939. Furthermore, WNT2B expression in UC-MSCs showed a significant negative correlation with gestational age (GA). These results suggest that WNT signaling is involved in the regulation of GA-dependent UC-MSC proliferation.

1. Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a heterogeneous cell population that has a potential to proliferate and differentiate into trilineage mesenchymal cells: adipocytes, osteocytes, and chondrocytes. MSCs were initially isolated and characterized from the bone marrow (BM) [1, 2] and subsequently derived from almost all tissues including adipose tissue (AT), synovium, skin, dental pulp, umbilical cord blood (UCB), placenta, and umbilical cord (UC) [3]. Due to the ability to home to sites of injury, undergo differentiation, suppress immune responses, and modulate angiogenesis, MSCs are paid an increasing attention as a source for cell therapy against various degenerative diseases. Currently, MSCs from different sources have been tested in clinical studies for treatment of graft-versus-host disease, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, and so on [4, 5].

Although BM is the most well-characterized source of MSCs, it has certain limitations with the invasive BM aspiration and the decline in MSC proliferation and differentiation capacity with age. In contrast, fetal MSCs obtained from UCB, placenta, and UC have advantages with the noninvasive sampling during newborn delivery and the vigorous proliferation and differentiation capacity for cell therapy [6, 7]. Especially, human UC starts to develop at 4–8 weeks of gestation, continues to grow until 50–60 cm in length, and is usually discarded as medical waste after newborn delivery. Taken together, UC-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) will become a promising source for cell therapy [8, 9].

Various genes and signaling pathways are known to regulate MSC proliferation and differentiation. WNT signaling serves as a key regulator that influences various stages of embryonic development as well as tissue homeostasis in adulthood [10]. It affects the proliferation, self-renewal, and differentiation of various tissue stem cells and controls the various tissue renewal and regeneration in response to disease, trauma, and ageing [11]. WNT ligands, which comprise a family of 19 members in human, are evolutionally conserved, are lipid modified, and secreted glycoproteins. They can activate either β-catenin-dependent (canonical) or β-catenin-independent (noncanonical) pathways by acting on transmembrane receptor FZD and its coreceptors LRP5/LRP6. The canonical pathway inhibits the β-catenin destruction complex, associates the transcriptional coactivator β-catenin with the transcriptional factor complex TCF/LEF, and induces WNT target gene transcription. The noncanonical pathway is independent of β-catenin and mainly associates with Ca²⁺-dependent and JNK-dependent signaling pathways, which can impact on cell migration, cell polarity, and cytoskeletal organization. The molecular events occurring these noncanonical pathways are far less defined than the canonical pathway [12].

Early studies showed the profound impacts of WNT signaling on a variety of tissue stem cell proliferation and differentiation [13–15]. In MSCs, both stimulatory and inhibitory roles for WNT signaling in cell proliferation and differentiation into trilineage mesenchymal cells were documented [16]. The adipogenic differentiation of AT-derived MSCs (AT-MSCs) was inhibited by WNT signaling activation [17]. The potential of WNT signaling on osteogenic differentiation of MSCs was controversial, with both stimulatory and inhibitory effects being reported [18, 19]. An inhibitory effect of WNT signaling on chondrogenic differentiation was demonstrated in AT-MSCs [20].

Although UC can be obtained from a wide range of gestational age (GA) newborn as a result of preterm, term, and postterm delivery, their functional differences are poorly characterized [21]. An understanding of the molecular mechanisms controlling UC-MSC proliferation and differentiation is crucial to determining the drivers and effectors of the functional difference between different GA UC-MSCs as well as the most suitable use of UC-MSCs for cell therapy against degenerative diseases. In the present study, we isolated UC-MSCs from 23 infants delivered at 22–40 weeks of gestation and analyzed their gene expression and cell proliferation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Samples

Human UCs were obtained from 23 infants delivered at 22–40 weeks of gestation with parental written consent. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine (approval number 1370) and Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children’s Hospital (approval numbers 24-25) and conducted in accordance with the approved guidelines.

2.2. Preparation of UC-MSC

The umbilical cord (2-3 g weight) was collected, cut into 2-3 mm pieces, enzymatically dissociated with Liberase DH Research Grade (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) in PBS for 45–60 min at 37°C followed by the addition of 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to inhibit enzyme activity, and filtered through a 100 μm cell strainer (BD Bioscience, Bedford, MA). The resulting cells derived from all compartments of the umbilical cord (whole UC) were cultured at 37°C (5% CO₂ and 95% air) in MEM-α (Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan) containing 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) until confluent primary cultures were established. The cells were then disassociated with trypsin-EDTA (Wako Pure Chemical), and the trypsinized cells were seeded into fresh dishes and passaged to confluence. Serial passaging was carried out until the tenth passage. The cells at fifth to eighth passages were used in the present experiments.

2.3. Cell Surface Marker Analysis

UC-MSCs were dissociated with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA for 10 minutes, washed with PBS and suspended at ~1 × 10⁶ cells/ml in FCM buffer containing 1 × PBS, 2 mM EDTA, and 10% Block Ace (Dainippon Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan). The cells were incubated with phycoeryhrin- (PE-) conjugated mouse primary antibodies against CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45, CD73, CD90, CD105, or HLA-DR (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ) for 45 min on ice, washed with PBS, incubated with Fixable Viability Stain 450 (BD Bioscience) for 15 min at room temperature, washed with PBS, and filtered through a 70 μm cell strainer (BD Bioscience). PE-conjugated mouse IgG1 k, IgG2a k, or IgG2b k isotype control (BD Bioscience) was used as a negative control for each primary antibody. Flow cytometric analysis was performed using FACSAria III carrying a triple laser (BD Bioscience) and FACSDiva software (BD Bioscience).

2.4. Cell Differentiation

To verify the multipotency of UC-MSCs, the cells were induced to differentiate into the adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic lineages. Adipogenic differentiation was induced in STEMPRO adipogenesis differentiation medium (Invitrogen) for 2-3 weeks and stained, and the differentiation was investigated by staining lipid vesicles with Oil Red O (Sigma). Osteogenic differentiation was induced in STEMPRO osteogenesis differentiation medium (Invitrogen) or STK-3 (DS Pharma Biomedical, Osaka, Japan) for 1-2 weeks, and the differentiation was examined by staining with Arizarin Red S (Sigma) reacting to calcium cation. Chondrogenic differentiation was induced by forming cell aggregates in micromass culture in STEMPRO chondorogenesis differentiation medium (Invitrogen) for 1 week, and the differentiation was assessed by staining anionic glycoconjugates with Toluidine Blue (Sigma). Cell images were acquired using a BZ-X700 microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).

2.5. RNA Extraction

Total RNA from UC-MSCs and fibroblasts was extracted with a TRIZOL Plus RNA purification kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was evaluated by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) using RNA 6000 nanokit (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.6. Gene Expression Microarray Analysis

Total RNA from three term and five preterm UC-MSCs (Table 1) was subjected to global gene expression analysis using the Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit One-Color (Agilent Technologies) and SurePrint G3 Human Gene Expression v3 8 × 60 K Microarray Kit (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, double-stranded cDNA was synthesized from 100 ng of total RNA by AffinityScript-RT using T7 promoter-incorporated Oligo-dT primer. Cyanine 3- (Cy3-) CTP-incorporated RNA (cRNA) was generated using the second strand cDNA as a template via an in vitro transcription reaction. The amplified cRNA was purified with the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and quantified cRNA by the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). 600 ng of Cy3-labeled cRNA was hybridized to the microarray slides at 65°C for 17 hr with rotation at 10 rpm. After hybridization, the slides were washed and scanned by the SureScan (Agilent Technologies), the images were subsequently extracted using the Feature Extraction Software (Agilent Technologies). Extracted data with good QC metrics were normalized (percentile shift to the 75th percentile) and filtered by gene expression (20.0–100.0 percentile), flags for signals and error for CV in the GeneSpring GX (v 14.5) (Agilent Technologies). The processed data were subjected to statistical analysis (moderated T-test with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR), and the corrected value <0.05 was determined to be significant (). The following analyses were performed for further data interpretation: principal component analysis (PCA), clustering analysis, GO (gene ontology) analysis, and pathway analysis with curated datasets of WikiPathways (413 pathways) and KEGG (10 pathways). A gene-set list associated with human WNT signaling pathway (150 genes, 04310 from KEGG pathways) was obtained from a public database (https://www.stemformatics.org/).

Table 1: UC-MSC sample characteristics.

Sample
Gestational age (weeks)
Birth weight (g)
Sex
Apgar score 1 min
Apgar score 5 min
Paternal age (years)
Maternal age (years)
Gravidity
Parity
Perinatal history
Maternal complication
Usage in the present study

Pre-1
24
530
Female
1
3
42
38
2
2
Cesarean section due to non-reassuring fetal status involved with abruption of placenta
Pregnancy-induced hypertension
Figures 2, 3, 5, and 6, S

Pre-2
25
656
Male
4
8
26
31
0
0
Cesarean section due to active premature labor

Figures 2, 3, 5, and 6, S

Pre-3
26
338
Male
2
2
37
36
1
1
Cesarean section due to active premature labor involved with placental hematoma

Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, S

Pre-4
22
550
Male
1
4
26
25
1
1
Cesarean section due to active premature labor

Figures 2, 3, 5, and 6, S

Pre-5
23
530
Female
2
4
32
31
1
1
Vaginal delivery due to active premature labor

Figures 2, 3, 5, and 6, S

Pre-6
23
478
Female
1
5
32
32
2
1
Cesarean section due to active premature labor

Figures 5 and 6, S

Pre-7
24
642
Male
1
3
16
17
0
0
Cesarean section due to active premature labor

Figures 1, 5, and 6, S

Pre-8
26
750
Female
5
9
39
38
2
1
Cesarean section due to advancing pregnancy-induced hypertension
Pregnancy-induced hypertension Graves’ disease
Figures 4, 5, and 6, S

Pre-9
26
568
Female
4
7
38
36
2
1
Cesarean section due to non-reassuring fetal status
Low-lying placenta
Figure 4

Int-1
30
1546
Female
7
8
44
42
0
0
Cesarean section due to non-reassuring fetal status

Figure 6, S

Int-2
31
1170
Male
4
7
27
28
1
1
Cesarean section due to non-reassuring fetal status
Pregnancy-induced hypertension
Figure 6, S

Int-3
34
2062
Female
7
9
48
42
3
2
Cesarean section due to non-reassuring fetal status
Pregnancy-induced hypertension
Figure 6, S

Term-1
38
2550
Male
8
8
37
34
0
0
Cesarean section due to placental previa

Figures 2, 3, and 6, S

Term-2
40
2546
Male
2
6
40
44
1
1
Cesarean section due to non-reassuring fetal status

Figures 2, 3, and 6, S

Term-3
38
3314
Male
8
8
40
33
0
0
Cesarean section due to breech presentation

Figures 2, 3, 5, and 6, S

Term-4
37
2750
Female
8
9
36
33
0
0
Cesarean section due to placental previa

Figures 5 and 6, S

Term-5
37
3062
Male
9
10
35
35
1
1
Repeated cesarean section

Figure 5

Term-6
37
2776
Female
8
9
42
45
2
1
Repeated cesarean section

Figures 5 and 6, S

Term-7
38
3390
Male
9
10
32
26
1
1
Normal vaginal delivery

Figures 5 and 6, S

Term-8
38
2960
Male
8
9
38
39
1
1
Repeated cesarean section

Figures 1, 5, and 6, S

Term-9
38
3144
Female
8
8
39
39
1
1
Repeated cesarean section

Figure 4

Term-10
38
2666
Female
8
9
28
28
0
0
Cesarean section due to breech presentation

Figure 4

Term-11
39
2892
Female
9
9
37
31
1
0
Cesarean section due to breech presentation

Figure 4

2.7. Quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR)

cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA from UC-MSCs by using a QuantiTect reverse transcription kit (Qiagen). Real-time PCR analysis was performed with an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using FastStart Universal SYBR Green master mix (Roche) with 0.5 μM sense and antisense primers and cDNA (corresponding to 12.5 ng total RNA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each cDNA was amplified with a precycling hold at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 60 sec, and one cycle at 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 60 sec, 95°C for 15 sec, and 60°C for 15 sec. Relative expression of each transcript was calculated based on the ΔΔCt method using β-actin (ACTB) as an endogenous reference for normalization. Primer sequences for WNT2, WNT2B, WNT3A, WNT4, WNT5B, WNT6, SFRP1, and ACTB were shown in Table 2. All sample measurements were repeated at least three times, and the results were expressed as the mean ± SE.

Table 2: Primers used for RT-qPCR.

Forward primer
Reverse primer

WNT2
tttggcagggtcctactcc
cctggtgatggcaaatacaa

WNT2B
aacttacataataaccgctgtggtc
actcacgccatggcactt

WNT3A
aactgcaccaccgtccac
aaggccgactccctggta

WNT4
gcagagccctcatgaacct
cacccgcatgtgtgtcag

WNT5B
gcgagaagactggaatcagg
cagagcagccgtgaacag

WNT6
agagtgccagttccagttcc
gaacacgaaggccgtctc

SFRP1
gctggagcacgagaccat
tggcagttcttgttgagca

ACTB
ccaaccgcgagaagatga
ccagaggcgtacagggatag

2.8. Ki-67 Staining

Cell suspensions of UC-MSCs were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and two smears were immediately prepared. Slides were fixed in 95% ethanol for immunostaining or fixed in 20% formalin and 80% methanol and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), respectively. Immunostaining was performed with antibody against Ki-67 (Clone MIB-1, Dako, Santa Clara, CA) using Leica Bond-Max automation and Bond Polymer Refine detection kit (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. IHC cytology protocol included primary antibody incubation for 15 min, post primary for 8 min, polymer for 8 min, peroxide block for 5 min, mixed DAB refine for 10 min, and followed by 5 min hematoxylin counterstaining.

2.9. MTS Assay

UC-MSCs were seeded at the density of 12,000 cells/well in a 12-well plate, incubated in 1 ml of MEM-α with 10% FBS in the presence or absence of 10 μM XAV939 (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX) at 37°C (5% CO₂ and 95% air) for 24, 48, or 72 h. Cell proliferation was then determined by the CellTiter 96H AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, 200 μl of MTS reagent (a tetrazolium compound) was added into each well and incubated at 37°C (5% CO₂ and 95% air) for 4 h. The absorbance at 490 nm was measured using an EnSpire Microplate Reader (Perkin Elmer, Poland, OR). All experiments were repeated at least three times, and the results were expressed as the mean ± SE.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Pearson’s correlation coefficients were determined, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare two independent datasets, using Excel software (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and Excel Statistics (Statcel 3; Social Survey Research Information, Tokyo, Japan). Differences were considered statistically significant for .

3. Results

3.1. UC-MSCs Isolated from Infants Delivered at 22–40 Weeks of Gestation

We first obtained UCs from infants delivered at 22–40 weeks of gestation and then isolated the plastic-adherent cells from these UCs (Table 1). The cells exhibited a spindle-like shape (Figure 1(a)). Their cell surface markers were positive for MSC signature markers CD73, CD90, and CD105 but negative for hematopoietic, macrophage, and endothelial markers CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45, and HLA-DR by flow cytometric analysis (Figure 1(b)). There were no statistically significant differences in the percentages of MSC signature marker-positive cells (CD73: 99.9 ± 0.1% and 99.6 ± 0.4%, CD90: 99.9 ± 0.1% and 99.5 ± 0.5%, and CD105: 99.7 ± 0.3% and 99.5 ± 0.5%) between preterm and term UCs.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1: Characterization of UC-MSCs from term and preterm infants. (a) UC-MSCs from preterm (24 weeks of gestation, preterm UC-MSCs) and term (38 weeks of gestation, term UC-MSCs) newborns at passage numbers 6 to 7 were examined by phase-contrast microscopy. The images shown are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bars show 100 μm. (b) Preterm and term UC-MSCs were analyzed by flow cytometer using antibodies against MSC markers (CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45, CD73, CD90, CD105, and HLA-DR) defined by ISCT [22]. The histograms shown are representative of three independent experiments. (c) Preterm and term UC-MSCs were differentiated into adipocyte as visualized by Oil Red O and into osteocyte as visualized by Alizarin Red S and chondrocyte as visualized by Toluidine Blue. The images shown are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bars represent 50 μm.

Under standard in vitro differentiation conditions, both preterm and term UC-MSCs were induced to differentiate into osteocytes, adipocytes, and chondrocytes (Figure 1(c)). Preterm UC-MSCs did not qualitatively differ from term UC-MSCs in their capacity to differentiate into trilineage mesenchymal cells. Taken together, the resulting cells fulfilled the criteria defined by the ISCT position paper [22] and were defined as UC-MSCs.

3.2. Differentially Expressed Genes between Preterm and Term UC-MSCs

To get an insight into the functional difference between preterm and term UC-MSCs, we extracted total RNA from five preterm and three term UC-MSCs (Table 1) and performed microarray analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) for global gene expression revealed that preterm UC-MSC samples were clustered together and were separated from term UC-MSC samples (Figure 2(a)). In total, 5578 unique genes (4272 upregulated and 1306 downregulated) showed greater than twofold-expression changes between preterm and term UC-MSCs with a corrected value less than 0.05 (Figure 2(b), Supplementary Table S available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8749751). The pathway analysis of all differentially expressed genes identified significant enrichment of signaling pathways for immune/inflammatory reactions, cell-cell/cell-extracellular matrix interactions, glucose/lipid metabolism, and cell proliferation and differentiation (Table 3). Among these signaling pathways, we focused WNT signaling pathway that was previously implicated in the regulation of MSC proliferation and differentiation. Noticeably, 32/150 of WNT signaling pathway genes were overlapped with differentially expressed genes between preterm and term UC-MSCs (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2: Gene expression microarray analysis of preterm and term UC-MSCs. (a) PCA mapping of gene expression profile for preterm (pre-1-5) and term (term-1-3) UC-MSCs. (b) Heat map of 5578 differentially expressed gene with greater than twofold changes in preterm UC-MSCs as compared to term UC-MSCs at a corrected value less than 0.05. Green color refers to low levels of gene expression and red color to high levels. (c) Pie chart of altered expression genes and WNT signaling pathway genes. The list shows overlapped 32 genes. (d) Heat map of 32 genes extracted from (c). Green color refers to low levels of gene expression and red color to high levels.

Table 3: Pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes between preterm and term UC-MSCs.

Pathway
value
Matched
entities
Pathway entities

Hs_Interferon_alpha-beta_signaling_WP1835_83224
1.91E−09
29
122

Hs_GPCR_downstream_signaling_WP1824_83301
1.85E−07
171
919

Hs_Interferon_gamma_signaling_WP1836_83234
8.41E−06
32
170

Hs_NRF2_pathway_WP2884_83041
3.20E−05
36
143

Hs_Immunoregulatory_interactions_between_a_Lymphoid_and_a_non-Lymphoid_cell_WP1829_83164
5.33E−05
32
332

Hs_Gastrin-CREB_signalling_pathway_via_PKC_and_MAPK_WP2664_83266
1.55E−04
42
180

Hs_Focal_Adhesion_WP306_80308
2.25E−04
45
191

Hs_GPCR_ligand_binding_WP1825_83346
2.99E−04
85
438

Hs_Regulation_of_beta-cell_development_WP3513_83407
3.98E−04
11
28

Hs_Glycerophospholipid_biosynthesis_WP2740_83341
4.59E−04
26
96

Hs_Allograft_Rejection_WP2328_78554
5.49E−04
24
100

Hs_Extracellular_matrix_organization_WP2703_83106
6.47E−04
22
78

Hs_Selenium_Micronutrient_Network_WP15_82705
6.56E−04
23
84

MAPK signaling pathway
7.53E−04
55
257

Hs_MicroRNAs_in_cardiomyocyte_hypertrophy_WP1544_75258
7.89E−04
23
104

Hs_DNA_Damage_Response_(only_ATM_dependent)_WP710_79974
8.29E−04
29
114

Hs_Parkin-Ubiquitin_Proteasomal_System_pathway_WP2359_72121
9.16E−04
20
73

Hs_Cell_surface_interactions_at_the_vascular_wall_WP1794_83824
0.0010894155
25
99

Hs_BDNF_signaling_pathway_WP2380_79953
0.0012996251
34
144

Hs_Nuclear_Receptors_Meta-Pathway_WP2882_83040
0.0013138579
62
318

Hs_Wnt_Signaling_Pathway_WP428_79854
0.0013306512
19
67

Hs_B_Cell_Receptor_Signaling_Pathway_WP23_79985
0.0014992601
25
98

Hs_MAPK_Signaling_Pathway_WP382_79951
0.0016350249
38
168

Hs_SIDS_Susceptibility_Pathways_WP706_80056
0.0017464098
37
166

Hs_O-linked_glycosylation_WP3315_83262
0.0020349505
25
104

Hs_NGF_signalling_via_TRKA_from_the_plasma_membrane_WP1873_83147
0.0023317037
20
77

Hs_Arachidonic_acid_metabolism_WP2650_83044
0.0026565776
15
53

Hs_Vitamin_B12_Metabolism_WP1533_82707
0.0026565776
15
53

Hs_Folate_Metabolism_WP176_82704
0.0028243104
18
67

Hs_Nanoparticle-mediated_activation_of_receptor_signaling_WP2643_74251
0.0033263897
10
28

Hs_Muscle_contraction_WP1864_83290
0.0033954314
17
63

Hs_NCAM_signaling_for_neurite_out-growth_WP1866_83314
0.0033983262
12
40

Hs_Corticotropin-releasing_hormone_WP2355_79973
0.0034443145
23
92

Hs_Cori_Cycle_WP1946_79691
0.0037244426
7
23

Hs_Eicosanoid_Synthesis_WP167_82702
0.0037961914
8
25

Hs_Serotonin_Receptor_2_and_ELK-SRF-GATA4_signaling_WP732_80010
0.0037961914
8
20

Hs_Semaphorin_interactions_WP1907_83271
0.0040335725
18
67

Hs_Histidine,_lysine,_phenylalanine,_tyrosine,_proline_and_tryptophan_catabolism_WP3573_83463
0.005489827
12
39

Hs_ACE_Inhibitor_Pathway_WP554_77712
0.0055746404
7
17

Hs_Integrin-mediated_Cell_Adhesion_WP185_80036
0.005693194
24
101

Hs_Prostaglandin_Synthesis_and_Regulation_WP98_72088
0.0058502043
10
31

Hs_GPCRs,_Class_A_Rhodopsin-like_WP455_81793
0.0062826765
50
262

Hs_Phase_1_-_Functionalization_of_compounds_WP1879_83057
0.0067225243
21
88

Hs_Complement_and_Coagulation_Cascades_WP558_79680
0.007009079
16
61

Hs_Lipid_digestion,_mobilization,_and_transport_WP2764_83187
0.0071218973
15
61

Hs_Type_II_diabetes_mellitus_WP1584_81779
0.0074452385
8
22

Hs_miRNA_targets_in_ECM_and_membrane_receptors_WP2911_83020
0.0074452385
8
45

Hs_Insulin_Signaling_WP481_82731
0.0084877005
34
161

Hs_L1CAM_interactions_WP1843_83082
0.008832967
21
92

Hs_Calcium_Regulation_in_the_Cardiac_Cell_WP536_80211
0.008975188
32
150

Hs_Cell_junction_organization_WP1793_83402
0.009355909
20
85

Hs_XBP1(S)_activates_chaperone_genes_WP3472_83243
0.010727612
22
98

Hs_G1_to_S_cell_cycle_control_WP45_80001
0.010931775
17
68

Hs_Prostate_Cancer_WP2263_80439
0.011036183
25
117

Hs_Wnt_Signaling_Pathway_and_Pluripotency_WP399_79474
0.011321301
23
101

Hs_Human_Complement_System_WP2806_83005
0.011321301
23
136

Hs_Assembly_of_collagen_fibrils_and_other_multimeric_structures_WP2798_83231
0.0113662705
9
29

Hs_DSCAM_interactions_WP1808_83372
0.0118092755
5
11

Hs_Arrhythmogenic_Right_Ventricular_Cardiomyopathy_WP2118_71265
0.012006286
18
78

Hs_Endothelin_Pathways_WP2197_74852
0.0121577475
10
33

Hs_Nuclear_Receptors_WP170_71083
0.012546546
11
38

Hs_Metapathway_biotransformation_WP702_73516
0.013431928
34
188

Hs_Potassium_Channels_WP2669_83272
0.0139101725
15
59

Hs_Myometrial_Relaxation_and_Contraction_Pathways_WP289_81078
0.014395579
32
156

Hs_Collagen_biosynthesis_and_modifying_enzymes_WP2725_83130
0.014458477
14
54

Hs_Cardiac_Hypertrophic_Response_WP2795_78544
0.014458477
14
54

Hs_IL-3_Signaling_Pathway_WP286_78583
0.014911717
13
49

Hs_Hematopoietic_Stem_Cell_Differentiation_WP2849_83039
0.015318828
11
98

Hs_Telomere_Maintenance_WP1928_83097
0.016210536
15
61

Hs_Signaling_Pathways_in_Glioblastoma_WP2261_81197
0.016799
19
83

Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis
0.017775405
16
66

Hs_Reversible_hydration_of_carbon_dioxide_WP2770_83176
0.017944276
5
12

Hs_Transport_of_inorganic_cations-anions_and_amino_acids-oligopeptides_WP1936_83267
0.01851932
21
97

Hs_Neural_Crest_Differentiation_WP2064_79263
0.01922032
22
101

Hs_Signaling_by_the_B_Cell_Receptor_(BCR)_WP2746_83158
0.020346014
24
247

Hs_Adipogenesis_WP236_80209
0.02145827
27
131

Hs_Secretion_of_Hydrochloric_Acid_in_Parietal_Cells_WP2597_78485
0.021901488
3
5

Pathways in cancer
0.023056423
59
327

Hs_NLR_Proteins_WP288_80026
0.02675793
4
10

Hs_Neurotransmitter_Release_Cycle_WP1871_83254
0.027170882
10
39

Hs_Transport_of_vitamins,_nucleosides,_and_related_molecules_WP1937_83207
0.027170882
10
38

Hs_S_Phase_WP2772_83395
0.02769413
25
123

Hs_Integrin_cell_surface_interactions_WP1833_83181
0.028421601
15
66

Hs_GABA_synthesis,_release,_reuptake_and_degradation_WP2685_83090
0.030757299
6
19

Hs_Transport_of_glucose_and_other_sugars,_bile_salts_and_organic_acids,_metal_ions_and_amine_compounds_WP1935_83132
0.0316663
21
100

Hs_Class_I_MHC_mediated_antigen_processing_&_presentation_WP3577_83467
0.032386538
49
330

Hs_Formation_of_Fibrin_Clot_(Clotting_Cascade)_WP1818_83143
0.032393858
10
39

Hs_Parkinsons_Disease_Pathway_WP2371_79766
0.032393858
10
71

Hs_ErbB_Signaling_Pathway_WP673_80202
0.032395784
13
55

Hs_Interferon_type_I_signaling_pathways_WP585_80201
0.032395784
13
54

Hs_Metabolism_of_water-soluble_vitamins_and_cofactors_WP1857_83083
0.033578653
19
93

Hs_Primary_Focal_Segmental_Glomerulosclerosis_FSGS_WP2572_79947
0.033947315
16
74

Hs_Glycolysis_and_Gluconeogenesis_WP534_78585
0.034427498
12
49

Hs_Interleukin-11_Signaling_Pathway_WP2332_79525
0.03641972
11
44

Hs_Sleep_regulation_WP3591_83861
0.0382818
10
39

Hs_Regulation_of_toll-like_receptor_signaling_pathway_WP1449_81172
0.03940498
27
149

Hs_PI_Metabolism_WP2747_83160
0.03972961
12
51

Hs_Signal_regulatory_protein_(SIRP)_family_interactions_WP1909_83190
0.0397491
4
11

Hs_Neurotoxicity_of_clostridium_toxins_WP2665_83321
0.0397491
4
22

Hs_Overview_of_nanoparticle_effects_WP3287_82926
0.039779507
6
22

Hs_Protein_folding_WP1892_83103
0.039869573
9
34

Hs_Platelet_homeostasis_WP1885_83192
0.041275427
15
70

Hs_Synthesis_of_DNA_WP1925_83144
0.04189585
20
98

Hs_Pathogenic_Escherichia_coli_infection_WP2272_78594
0.042428713
13
64

Hs_Mitotic_G1-G1-S_phases_WP1858_83315
0.042929105
25
128

Hs_Synaptic_Vesicle_Pathway_WP2267_78595
0.04557775
12
51

Hs_Spinal_Cord_Injury_WP2431_80343
0.046727844
23
117

Hs_Gamma_carboxylation,_hypusine_formation_and_arylsulfatase_activation_WP2762_83388
0.04724196
9
36

Hs_RAF-MAP_kinase_cascade_WP2735_83142
0.047904383
36
216

Hs_Binding_and_Uptake_of_Ligands_by_Scavenger_Receptors_WP2784_83217
0.048846867
11
195

Hs_Extracellular_vesicle-mediated_signaling_in_recipient_cells_WP2870_79555
0.04923168
8
30

We then confirmed a subset of these WNT signaling pathway gene expressions by RT-qPCR using cDNA from the same five preterm and three term UC-MSCs as a template. A subset included secreted WNT ligands and modulators: WNT2, WNT2B, WNT3A, WNT4, WNT5B, WNT6, and SFRP1. Consistent with microarray analysis, upregulated WNT2, WNT2B, WNT3A, WNT4, and WNT6 showed increased expression in preterm UC-MSCs compared to term UC-MSCs by RT-qPCR (Table 4, Figure 3). Decreased expression of downregulated WNT5B and SFRP1 was also detected by RT-qPCR (Table 4, Figure 3). Collectively, these results suggested that WNT signaling pathway gene expression in preterm UC-MSCs was distinct from term UC-MSCs.

Table 4: Differentially expressed WNT pathway genes between preterm and term UC-MSCs.

Gene
FC (pre versus term)
(Corr)

Ligands

WNT2
4.07917
0.01631

WNT2B
2.64791
0.02698

WNT3A
2.56017
0.02584

WNT6
2.35531
0.00938

WNT4
2.11623
0.00510

WNT5B
−3.93533
0.01317

Receptors

FZD9
3.47820
0.04035

TCF7L2
2.29222
0.01187

Extracellular modulators

DKK4
3.79029
0.01143

DKK2
−2.65327
0.01720

SFRP1
−3.13336
0.00621

Intracellular signaling molecules

CCND2
3.49892
0.02933

DAAM2
2.71289
0.00467

CER1
2.40160
0.03446

MAPK8
2.36091
0.00501

NFATC4
2.25687
0.01089

APC2
2.21774
0.04864

PPP2R5B
2.20956
0.00501

PRKCB
2.11780
0.00504

CAMK2A
2.03443
0.02825

APC
−2.01861
0.00578

FOSL1
−2.06872
0.03346

PRKACA
−2.16403
0.02705

PPP2R1A
−2.19719
0.04119

CCND3
−2.20727
0.01748

RUVBL1
−2.24427
0.02646

AXIN1
−2.47832
0.02670

RAC2
−2.51880
0.00902

TBL1X
−2.73244
0.01261

DVL1
−2.77299
0.00726

NFATC3
−2.82561
0.02238

CCND1
−3.28580
0.03436

Figure 3: WNT signaling pathway gene expression in preterm and term UC-MSCs. The relative expression of WNT2, WNT2B, WNT3A, WNT4, WNT6, WNT5B, and SFRP1 mRNA in preterm () and term () UC-MSCs was analyzed by RT-qPCR. The mean of term UC-MSCs was set as 1. The results shown are the mean ± SE.

3.3. Cell Proliferation of Preterm and Term UC-MSCs

To examine the function of WNT signaling pathway genes in preterm and term UC-MSCs, we isolated UC-MSCs from nine preterm (22–26 weeks of gestation) and nine term (37–39 weeks of gestation) infants (Table 1) and analyzed their cell proliferation. We first evaluated the expression of Ki-67, a marker of proliferating cells expressed in all active phases of the cell cycle (G1, S, G2, and M), by immunocytochemistry [23]. The percentages of Ki-67-positive cells were markedly increased in preterm UC-MSCs as compared to term UC-MSCs, albeit not statistically significant (Figure 4).

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: Ki-67 staining of preterm and term UC-MSCs. (a) Smears of preterm () and term () UC-MSCs were prepared, immunostained with anti-Ki-67 antibody, and counterstained with hematoxylin. The images shown are representative of three independent experiments. (b) The percentage of Ki-67 positive was determined by manually counting 1000 cells and expressed as the mean ± SE.

We then analyzed cell proliferation of preterm and term UC-MSCs by MTS assay. Although both preterm and term UC-MSCs showed vigorous proliferation, the proliferation rate of preterm UC-MSCs measured at 72 h was significantly faster than term UC-MSCs (Figure 5(a)). Next, we examined the effect of WNT signaling inhibition on the growth of preterm and term UC-MSCs using a small molecule XAV939. XAV939 is a potent inhibitor of Tankyrase1 and Tankyrase2, and this inhibition stabilizes Axin1 and Axin2, the concentration-limiting component of the WNT pathway transcription factor β-catenin destruction complex. Increased levels of Axin1 and Axin2 stimulate β-catenin degradation and thereby inhibit β-catenin-mediated transcription [24]. Treatment of preterm UC-MSCs with 10 μM XAV939 resulted in significant inhibition of cell proliferation (Figure 5(b)). Term UC-MSC proliferation was also reduced by 10 μM XAV939, but there was no statistical significance (Figure 5(c)). These results suggest that WNT signaling is involved in the enhanced cell proliferation of preterm UC-MSCs compared to term UC-MSCs.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 5: Cell proliferation of preterm and term UC-MSCs. Preterm () and term () UC-MSCs were cultured in the absence or presence of XAV939 for 24, 48, and 72 h. Their cell proliferation was determined by MTS assay and expressed as the percent increase. The results shown are the mean ± SE of (a) preterm and term UC-MSCs, (b) preterm UC-MSCs ± XAV939, and (c) term UC-MSCs ± XAV939.

3.4. Gestational Age-Dependent Expression of WNT Signaling Pathway Genes

We further analyzed WNT2, WNT2B, WNT3A, WNT4, WNT5B, WNT6, and SFRP1 expressions in UC-MSCs isolated from other 10 infants delivered at 22–40 weeks of gestation by RT-qPCR. Expression of these WNT signaling pathway genes tended to decrease or increase with gestational age. Among them, WNT2B expression showed a statistically significant negative correlation with gestational age (Figure 6, Supplementary Figure S).

Figure 6: Gestational age-dependent expression of WNT signaling pathway genes. The relative expression of WNT2B mRNA in UC-MSCs isolated from 18 infants delivered at 22–40 weeks of gestation was analyzed by RT-qPCR. The mean of all UC-MSCs was defined as 1.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we isolated UC-MSCs from 23 infants delivered at 22–40 weeks of gestation and obtained the following findings. (1) Global gene expression in preterm UC-MSCs was distinct from term UC-MSCs. (2) WNT signaling pathway genes were enriched in differentially expressed genes between preterm and term UC-MSCs. (3) Preterm UC-MSC proliferation was faster than term UC-MSCs. (4) WNT signaling inhibitor XAV939 significantly inhibited the cell proliferation of preterm but not term UC-MSCs. (5) WNT2B expression in UC-MSCs showed a significant negative correlation with GA.

MSCs are isolated from a variety of tissues and result in so heterogeneous population of cells, and not all of them express the same phenotypic markers. In the case of BM-MSCs, younger donor-derived BM-MSCs showed greater proliferative and differentiative potential than older counterparts and may have more potential for cell therapy [25, 26]. Although fetal MSCs could be isolated from newborns delivered at a wide range of GA as a result of preterm, term, and postterm delivery, their GA-dependent function remained poorly characterized [8, 9]. With regard to UCB-MSCs, the MSC population in UCB was significantly higher in preterm newborn compared to term newborn [27, 28]. In the case of UC-MSCs, MSCs were isolated from different UC compartments including cord lining, perivascular region (PV), Wharton’s jelly (WJ), and whole UC [29–31]. Preterm UCs were shown to contain more perivascular cells (PVCs), identical to MSCs, than term UCs [32]. Preterm PVCs/UC-MSCs isolated from fetuses aborted at 8–12 weeks of gestation were reported to exhibit a greater proliferative potential, a more efficient differentiation into chondrogenic and adipogenic cell lineages, and a differential gene expression profile compared to term PVCs/UC-MSCs isolated from newborns delivered at 37–40 weeks of gestation [33]. Although we isolated UC-MSCs from the whole UC and preterm newborns delivered at 22–26 weeks of gestation, the present study and others supported that proliferative capacity of UC-MSCs declined with GA.

Global gene expression analysis identified 5578 differentially expressed genes between preterm and term UC-MSCs (Figure 2(a), Table S). The pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment of 111 signaling pathways (Table 3). Immune/inflammatory reaction-associated signaling pathways were top-ranked among the list (Table 3). The upregulation of interferon (IFN) signaling pathways in preterm UC-MSCs may be interpreted as the consequence of preterm delivery that has inherent fetal and/or maternal indications (Table 1, Table 3). Although cell cycle and senescence-associated secretory phenotype pathways were also expected to affect the growth rate and GA-dependent changes of UC-MSCs, these pathways were not included in the list (Table 3).

WNT signaling is a key regulator of stem cell functions in development, renewal, and regeneration of multiple tissues [13–15]. In the case of MSCs, mRNA expression of a subset of WNT signaling pathway genes including WNT2, WNT4, WNT5A, WNT11, WNT16, SFRP2, SFRP3, and SFRP4 was detected in BM-MSCs [34]. WNT2, WNT2B, WNT4, WNT5A, WNT5B, SFRP1, and SFRP4 were also highly expressed in AT-MSCs under hypoxic stress conditions [35]. Comparison of BM-MSCs with UC-MSCs revealed lower differentiation capacity toward osteocytes and adipocytes along with the downregulation of WNT3A, WNT5A, WNT5B, WNT7B, WNT8A, SFRP1, and SFRP4 in UC-MSCs compared to BM-MSCs [36]. Consistent with these observations, the present study revealed a significant enrichment of WNT2, WNT2B, WNT3A, WNT4, WNT5B, WNT6, and SFRP1 in differentially expressed genes between preterm and term UC-MSCs (Figure 2(c)). Noticeably, WNT2, WNT2B, WNT4, WNT5B, WNT6, and SFRP1 were associated with a noncanonical WNT pathway, as opposed to only WNT3A with a canonical WNT pathway among these WNT ligands and modulators in UC-MSCs [12]. In contrast, the enhanced cell proliferation of preterm UC-MSCs was abolished by XAV939, which selectively decreased β-catenin expression through Tankyrase1 and Tankyrase2 inhibition and increased Axin1 and Axin2 expression (Figure 5) [24]. Accumulating evidence indicates that noncanonical WNT signaling can inhibit canonical WNT signaling [37, 38] and that activation of either canonical or noncanonical WNT signaling is highly dependent on the cell type and on specific receptors expressed by the cells [39, 40]. Further understanding of how WNT signaling pathway controls the GA-dependent proliferation of UC-MSC will be crucial to develop UC-MSC-based cell therapy.

In summary, preterm UC-MSC proliferation is significantly faster than term UC-MSCs, and WNT signaling is involved in the regulation of this GA-dependent proliferation of UC-MSCs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (Grant no. 25461644) and Young Scientists (B) (Grant no. 26860845) of JSPS KAKENHI. The authors thank Drs. Shohei Ohyama, Sachiyo Fukushima, Oshi Tokuda, Kaori Maeyama, and Miwako Nagasaka for collecting the umbilical cord samples.

References

A. J. Friedenstein, K. V. Petrakova, A. I. Kurolesova, and G. P. Frolova, “Heterotopic of bone marrow. Analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues,” Transplantation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 230–247, 1968.

A. I. Caplan, “Mesenchymal stem cells,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 641–650, 1991.

M. Crisan, S. Yap, L. Casteilla et al., “A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 301–313, 2008.

P. Bianco, P. G. Robey, and P. J. Simmons, “Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 313–319, 2008.

P. Bianco, ““Mesenchymal” stem cells,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 677–704, 2014.

D. Baksh, R. Yao, and R. S. Tuan, “Comparison of proliferative and multilineage differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord and bone marrow,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1384–1392, 2007.

S. Manochantr, Y. U-pratya, P. Kheolamai et al., “Immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stromal cells derived from amnion, placenta, wharton's jelly and umbilical cord,” Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 430–439, 2013.

D.-C. Ding, Y.-H. Chang, W.-C. Shyu, and S.-Z. Lin, “Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: a new era for stem cell therapy,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 339–347, 2015.

I. Arutyunyan, A. Elchaninov, A. Makarov, and T. Fatkhudinov, “Umbilical cord as prospective source for mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 6901286, 17 pages, 2016.

H. Clevers and R. Nusse, “Wnt/β-catenin signaling and disease,” Cell, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 1192–1205, 2012.

H. Clevers, K. M. Loh, and R. Nusse, “Stem cell signaling. An integral program for tissue renewal and regeneration: Wnt signaling and stem cell control,” Science, vol. 346, no. 6205, article 1248012, 2014.

H. A. Baarsma, M. Königshoff, and R. Gosens, “The Wnt signaling pathway from ligand secretion to gene transcription: molecular mechanisms and pharmacological targets,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 66–83, 2013.

V. Korinek, N. Barker, P. Moerer et al., “Depletion of epithelial stem-cell compartments in the small intestine of mice lacking tcf-4,” Nature Genetics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 379–383, 1998.

U. Gat, R. DasGupta, L. Degenstein, and E. Fuchs, “De novo hair follicle morphogenesis and hair tumors in mice expressing a truncated beta-catenin in skin,” Cell, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 605–614, 1998.

R. DasGupta and E. Fuchs, “Multiple roles for activated lef/tcf transcription complexes during hair follicle development and differentiation,” Development, vol. 126, no. 20, pp. 4557–4568, 1999.

M. Visweswaran, S. Pohl, F. Arfuso et al., “Multi-lineage differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells - to Wnt, or not Wnt,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 68, pp. 139–147, 2015.

J. R. Park, J.-W. Jung, Y.-S. Lee, and K.-S. Kang, “The roles of Wnt antagonists dkk1 and sfrp4 during adipogenesis of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 859–874, 2008.

C. A. Gregory, W. G. Gunn, E. Reyes et al., “How Wnt signaling affects bone repair by mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1049, no. 1, pp. 97–106, 2005.

J. de Boer, R. Siddappa, C. Gaspar, A. van Apeldoorn, R. Fodde, and C. van Blitterswijk, “Wnt signaling inhibits osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells,” Bone, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 818–826, 2004.

S. Luo, Q. Shi, Z. Zha et al., “Inactivation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in human adipose-derived stem cells is necessary for chondrogenic differentiation and maintenance,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 819–824, 2013.

D. Zhu, E. M. Wallace, and R. Lim, “Cell-based therapies for the preterm infant,” Cytotherapy, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1614–1628, 2014.

M. Dominici, K. Le Blanc, I. Mueller et al., “Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The international society for cellular therapy position statement,” Cytotherapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 315–317, 2006.

J. Gerdes, H. Lemke, H. Baisch, H. H. Wacker, U. Schwab, and H. Stein, “Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody ki-67,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 1710–1715, 1984.

S.-M. A. Huang, Y. M. Mishina, S. Liu et al., “Tankyrase inhibition stabilizes axin and antagonizes Wnt signalling,” Nature, vol. 461, no. 7264, pp. 614–620, 2009.

K. Mareschi, I. Ferrero, D. Rustichelli et al., “Expansion of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from pediatric and adult donor bone marrow,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 744–754, 2006.

D. M. Choumerianou, G. Martimianaki, E. Stiakaki, L. Kalmanti, M. Kalmanti, and H. Dimitriou, “Comparative study of stemness characteristics of mesenchymal cells from bone marrow of children and adults,” Cytotherapy, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 881–887, 2010.

M. J. Javed, L. E. Mead, D. Prater et al., “Endothelial colony forming cells and mesenchymal stem cells are enriched at different gestational ages in human umbilical cord blood,” Pediatric Research, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 68–73, 2008.

A. Jain, N. Mathur, M. Jeevashankar et al., “Does mesenchymal stem cell population in umbilical cord blood vary at different gestational periods?” Indian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 375–379, 2013.

M. T. Conconi and R. Di Liddo, “Phenotype and differentiation potential of stromal populations obtained from various zones of human umbilical cord: an overview,” The Open Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Journal, vol. 4, pp. 6–20, 2011.

C. Mennan, K. Wright, A. Bhattacharjee, B. Balain, J. Richardson, and S. Roberts, “Isolation and characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells from different regions of the human umbilical cord,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 916136, 8 pages, 2013.

A. Subramanian, C. Y. Fong, A. Biswas, and A. Bongso, “Comparative characterization of cells from the various compartments of the human umbilical cord shows that the wharton’s jelly compartment provides the best source of clinically utilizable mesenchymal stem cells,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 6, article e0127992, 2015.

T. Montemurro, G. Andriolo, E. Montelatici et al., “Differentiation and migration properties of human foetal umbilical cord perivascular cells: potential for lung repair,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 796–808, 2011.

S.-H. Hong, L. Maghen, S. Kenigsberg et al., “Ontogeny of human umbilical cord perivascular cells: molecular and fate potential changes during gestation,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 22, no. 17, pp. 2425–2439, 2013.

S. L. Etheridge, G. J. Spencer, D. J. Heath, and P. G. Genever, “Expression profiling and functional analysis of Wnt signaling mechanisms in mesenchymal stem cells,” Stem Cells, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 849–860, 2004.

O. O. Udartseva, E. R. Andreeva, and L. B. Buravkova, “Wnt-associated gene expression in human mesenchymal stromal cells under hypoxic stress,” Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 465, no. 1, pp. 354–357, 2015.

A. K. Batsali, C. Pontikoglou, D. Koutroulakis et al., “Differential expression of cell cycle and Wnt pathway-related genes accounts for differences in the growth and differentiation potential of Wharton’s jelly and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 102, 2017.

M. J. Nemeth, L. Topol, S. M. Anderson, Y. Yang, and D. M. Bodine, “Wnt5a inhibits canonical Wnt signaling in hematopoietic stem cells and enhances repopulation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 39, pp. 15436–15441, 2007.

A. J. Mikels and R. Nusse, “Purified Wnt5a protein activates or inhibits beta-catenin-tcf signaling depending on receptor context,” PLoS Biology, vol. 4, no. 4, article e115, 2006.

R. van Amerongen, A. Mikels, and R. Nusse, “Alternative Wnt signaling is initiated by distinct receptors,” Science Signaling, vol. 1, no. 35, article re9, 2008.

G. Liu, A. Bafico, and S. A. Aaronson, “The mechanism of endogenous receptor activation functionally distinguishes prototype canonical and noncanonical Wnts,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 3475–3482, 2005.