With the increasing of coal mining depth, the mining conditions are deteriorating, and dynamic hazard is becoming more likely to happen. This paper analyzes the relations and differences between rockburst in the coal mine and rockburst in the metal mine. It divides coal mine rockburst into two types including static loading type during roadway excavation process and dynamic loading type during mining face advancing. It proposes the correlation between the formation process of rockburst and the evolution of overlying strata spatial structure of the stope, criterion of rockburst occurrence, new classification, and predictive evaluation method for rockburst hazard that rockburst damage evaluation (RDE) = released energy capacity (REC)/absorbed energy capacity (AEC). Based on the relationship between RDE value and its corresponding level of rockburst hazard, the rockburst hazard can be divided into five types and evaluation index of each type can be achieved. Then the ongoing rockburst damage level can be classified in one of the five types, and the relative parameters, such as hazard extent, controlling measures also can be achieved. This new quantitative method could not only assess the impacting direction of rockburst occurrence, but also verify the effect of preventive measures for rockburst.
With the increasing mining depth and mining intensity, dynamic hazard, such as rockburst, is becoming more likely to happen, which threatens the safe and high-efficient mining [
With addition of the complexity of mining geological condition, the problem of rockburst is particularly acute, so a scientific solution to predict and control the rockburst is urgently needed.
Rockburst in coal mine is a dynamic phenomenon with sudden severe damage, throw-out of large quantity of rock or coal body, and loud sound in the surrounding rock of roadway or working face, which is induced by instantaneous release of elastic deformed energy of the surrounding rock and occurs during the mining process. It usually leads to severe supporting device damage and large deformation in the roadway and working face, casualties and coal mine collapse in the worse situation, and even ground collapse that induces local earthquake. It is one of major hazards in coal mine [
Rockburst in metal mine or underground tunnel occurs in the geological condition of high stress area and is a dynamic phenomenon of rock crack and damage or rock ejection induced by the sudden release of rock mass stored elastic energy during the excavation process [
Considering economic factors and temporary requirements, deformation or little damage of the surrounding rock is allowed in coal mining projects, as long as the structure of the surrounding rock does not fail and meets the production safety requirements. Underground tunneling projects do not allow big deformation or little damage. Moreover, mining-induced stress is another characteristic in coal mine, which is much bigger than that of underground tunneling projects.
The similar parts between rockburst in coal mine and rockburst in metal mine or underground tunnels are a dynamic phenomenon with rock breaking and throw-out because of sudden release of surrounding rock stress. The difference between them is that, in mining engineering, the sign of rockburst occurrence depends on whether this dynamic phenomenon can induce serious damage and geological hazard or not. With no serious damage or geological hazard, the treatment measures are not needed. So the dynamic failure phenomenon which needs to be taken in treatment measures in coal mine is called rockburst, and its hazard evaluation criterion should be the induced serious damage and the geological hazard.
Many researchers propose different classification methods of rockburst from different perspectives. According to the position of rockburst occurrence, coal mine rockburst is divided into three types including rockburst of coal seam, rockburst of roof, rockburst of floor. According to the energy source of rockburst, it is divided into the gravitative type, the tectonic type, and gravitative-tectonic type. According to the magnitude of impact energy, it is divided into microimpact type, weak impact type, medium impact type, strong impact type, and disastrous impact type. Based on loading type of coal or rock material and their failure models, rockburst is divided into static load-induced stress type of burst failure and dynamic load-induced vibration type of burst failure [
Pan et al. summarize and analyze crucial influencing factors of 67 coal mines where rockburst had occurred in the recent 5 years in China. The statistics of geological factors and technical factors for rockburst prone mines are shown in Table
Statistics of main factors in rockburst mines [
Geological factors | Amount of rockburst mines (2008–2013) | Typical examples |
---|---|---|
Hard and thick roof | 48 | Dongtan and Baodian coal mines; Liangzhuang, Xiezhuang, and Panxi coal mines; Sanhejian coal mine; number 11 and number 12 coal mines in Pingdingshan; Tangshan coal mine; Junde and Nanshan coal mines; Xinxing coal mine |
|
||
Overlying strata with large thickness | 5 | Huafeng coal mine; Qianqiu coal mine; Shijie coal mine; Wanglou coal mine |
|
||
Hard roof-and-floor | 6 | Tongjialiang and Xizhouyao coal mines; Huafeng and Suncun coal mines; Hetaoshan coal mine; Yanbei coal mine |
|
||
Geological structure | 38 | Laohutai coal mine; Sunjiawan coal mine; Guantai coal mine; Tangshan and Zhaogezhuang coal mines; Panxi coal mine |
|
||
Great inclined coal seam | 3 | Huating coal mine; Muchengjian coal mine; Huafeng coal mine |
|
||
Change of coal thickness | 2 | Jisan coal mine; Xiezhuang coal mine |
|
||
Natural earthquake | 1 | Zhaogezhuang coal mine |
|
||
Gob-surrounded coal pillar | 26 | Qianqiu coal mine; Jisan, Dongtan, Baodian, and Jiyi coal mines; Xiezhuang coal mine; Zhuangji coal mine; number 11 coal mine in Pingdingshan; Tangshan and Zhaogezhuang coal mines |
|
||
Upper coal pillar formed in the mining coal seam group | 11 | Huafeng coal mine; Tongjialiang and Xizhouyao coal mines; Junde coal mine |
|
||
Blast-induced vibration | 6 | Liangzhuang coal mine; Zhaogezhuang coal mine; Nanshan coal mine; Muchengjian coal mine |
This paper, based on the energy viewpoint, redivides the coal mine rockburst into two types including static loading type during roadway excavation mainly induced by the compressive elastic energy release of coal seam (Figure
Mechanical structure of static loading type during roadway excavation.
Mechanical structure of dynamic loading type during mining face advancing.
For high strength coal or rock seam, high level elastic stored energy and high level stress concentration induced by tectonic movement and mining face advancing are the root cause of coal mine rockburst [
In the mining process of deep mines, dynamic evolution and development of stress field and energy field create conditions for the formation, occurrence, and development of rockburst. Rockburst is an energy-releasing process with instability in time and nonuniformity in space. Namely, from the time perspective, if the energy releasing rate in coal or rock body is greater than energy consumption rate, then the process of system failure is instable [
Rockburst occurrence depends mainly on impacting properties and stress state of rock or coal body. Bursting proneness is the internal property of coal or rock body, which can be obtained from the laboratory test. Mining stress is the dynamic factor for rockburst occurrence. Rockburst usually occurs in intake or return airway close to the working face. Its range is between zero and 80 meters in front of working face. The movement of overlying strata in the stope leads to stress redistribution, which may result in instability of the surrounding rock and the occurrence of mine dynamic hazard. The evolution of mining stress is a dynamic process and is related to the advancing distance of working face, coal mining method, geological structure and distribution, and characteristics of overlying strata spatial structure.
With the development of overlying strata spatial structure in the stope, there are two characteristics of mining stress distribution, including first weighting of overlying strata and periodic weighting of working face advancing, during the formation process of breakage arch that consists of the overlying strata. With overlying strata breaking, each hard roof weighting will impact high-level stress concentration zone, which possibly leads to bursting failure. The breakage arch usually consists of several groups of hard roof. So, in order to scientifically and quantitatively study the bursting proneness of high stress zone with mining disturbance, bursting hazard for every group of hard roof rupture should be evaluated, as shown in Figure
Structural model of the stope.
In Figure
At the position of maximum value of surrounding rock stress, the energy condition for rockburst occurrence is not only the concentrated static load, but also the accumulated elastic strain energy which is greater than minimum energy needed in the rupture process of coal or rock body. The impacting energy (
Mechanical structure of dynamic loading rockburst during mining face advancing is shown in Figure
From Figure
The energy condition of rockburst occurrence is that the sum of elastic strain energy accumulated in the limit equilibrium area and dynamic loading energy from the roof rupture should be greater than the minimum energy needed in the rupture process of coal or rock mass. The criterion is given by
Many researchers study the mechanism of rockburst by using strength theory, energy theory, damage and fracture theory, and catastrophe theory. According to these mechanisms, they further study the criterion of rockburst occurrence. The criteria used widely include E. Hoek method that uses the ratio of shear stress of coal wall and uniaxial compressive strength of rock as a criterion, Kidybinski method that uses stored energy, Hou F. L. critical covering depth method, Tao Z. Y. method that uses the ratio of uniaxial strength and maximum principal stress, and analogical method of surrounding rock classification [
The magnitude of the seismic event causing the damage should be considered, and whether or not a damaging seismic event is likely to occur at all should be considered also. Meanwhile, it is necessary to consider the distance from the event source to the damage location. It shows that when a significant dynamic load on an excavation occurs (after a rockburst), there is a relation between the seismic events disturbance and the degree of absorbing energy ability.
Rockburst damage is known to be highly variable. For any given seismic event at a given distance from an excavation, there can be considerable variation in the amount of rockburst damage. Released energy capacity describes the relationship between the elevated energy condition due to seismic events and the general accumulated energy in the investigated area:
The evaluated energy condition is based on seismic wave energy propagation at distance
AEC is represented by a rating scale dependent on installed support. Absorbed energy capacity equation includes the current installed reinforcement and its support load capacity in the risk estimations. The higher the capacity of the support to withstand dynamic damage, the larger the AEC. It is considered to account for the energy absorbing level of the rock support in the seismic rock failure process:
In general, it is difficult to calculate the real local stress in the anchorage area because of lack of high accuracy instrumentation. Therefore, the absorbed energy capacity (AEC) can be evaluated using qualitative scale of ground support capacity that represents basic support types in coal mine (see Table
Absorbed energy capacity scale for ground support.
Support type | AEC rating |
---|---|
No bolts | 1 |
Rock bolts | 2 |
Cable bolts | 3 |
Rock bolts and cable bolts | 4 |
Rock bolts and mesh | 5 |
Rock bolts, cable bolts, and mesh | 6 |
The scale of projected damage determines the necessary dynamic capacity of installed ground support. Proper ground reinforcement that can withstand dynamic loading and large deformations is required in order to reduce the rockburst hazard and protect worker and mine infrastructure and sustain safe operation [
The presented formula will be applied on real seismic data for the first time in coal mine. The obtained results must be evaluated and classified for their risk potential. Therefore, documented damaging events due to seismic activities in the coal mine will be used for general identification purposes. Nevertheless, further assessments with detailed result interpretation and benchmarking should be carried out to verify the assessment formula/approach.
To consider the likely magnitude and the distance of the seismic event responsible for rockburst damage, the REC index can be combined with the AEC. For assessing rockburst risk, the amount of seismic event energy can be used, which is directly obtained from the seismic events testing system. The combination of the two parameters is termed “rockburst damage evaluation” (RDE).
Based on probabilistic analysis of over 120 instances of rockburst damage, RDE values for which certain levels of rockburst damage are expected to occur are given. The rockburst damage was categorized using Table
Rockburst damage potential scale.
RDE | Rockburst damage scale | Expected working space damage | Expected support damage |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
No damage/minor deformation | No damage/minor deformation |
|
|||
|
|
Low reduction ratio of roadway section (0~20%), with normal production | Support system is loaded, with loose mesh and plates deformed |
|
|||
|
|
Medium reduction ratio of roadway section (20%~40%), with a small influence on normal production | Some broken bolts |
|
|||
|
|
Big reduction ratio of roadway section (40%~80%), with a big influence on normal production | Major damage to support system |
|
|||
|
|
Huge reduction ratio of roadway section (80%~100%), with a serious influence on normal production even stopping production | Complete failure of support system |
During the advancing process of working face number 9103 in Junde coal mine, the equipment had monitored 118 times microseismic phenomenon, five of which are rockburst that threw a large amount of rock or coal mass out and threatened mine safety production. Combined with microseismic monitoring data, we studied the energy, magnitude, and frequency of microseismic events before and after the rockburst.
Working face number 9103 in Junde coal mine uses slicing mining and fully mechanized coal mining for the first layer. Its mining height is 3.5 m. It is about 300 m in depth and has 40 m thickness of hard sandstone roof in the overlying strata and protective coal pillar with the width of 5 to 40 m. The width of working face is 150 m. The behavior of rock pressure is serious during the mining process. The spatial distribution of microearthquake and previous rockburst is shown in Figures
Spatial relation between microearthquake and mining.
Rock strata histogram.
Diagram of microearthquake.
According to the information on the previous rockburst in working face number 9103, the evaluation index of rockburst damage potential level for Junde coal mine is built. The previous rockburst in different roadway with same supporting method of bolt-mesh-cable support is shown in Tables
Statistics of previous rockburst in Junde coal mine.
RDE | AEC | REC |
|
|
|
|
Coefficient of stress concentration “ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.09 | 5.00 | 2.54 | 220000 | 60 | 0.74 | 30.00 | 2.00 |
4.56 | 5.00 | 2.28 | 126000 | 60 | 0.67 | 40.00 | 2.00 |
3.22 | 5.00 | 1.61 | 36700 | 30 | 0.61 | 50.00 | 1.50 |
9.27 | 5.00 | 4.64 | 936000 | 30 | 0.67 | 40.00 | 1.50 |
6.72 | 5.00 | 3.36 | 578000 | 60 | 0.70 | 35.00 | 2.00 |
4.28 | 5.00 | 2.14 | 63600 | 60 | 0.67 | 40.00 | 2.00 |
Characteristics of rockburst.
Number | Time | Energy of centrum |
Accumulated energy |
Distance from rockburst to centrum |
Characteristics of rockburst | Reason | Type of rockburst | RDE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aug. 30, 2012 |
|
60 | 30 | 50 m in front of working face; roof-to-floor convergence of 0.6 m, rib sides convergence of 1.2 m | Accumulated energy releasing of coal pillar induced by first weighting of hard roof | Dynamic load type during mining face advancing | 5.09 |
|
||||||||
2 | Jan. 9, 2013 |
|
60 | 40 | 40 m in front of working face; roof-to-floor convergence of 0.7 m, rib sides convergence of 0.5 m; working face supports broken | Accumulated energy releasing of coal pillar induced hard roof rupture | Dynamic load type | 4.56 |
|
||||||||
3 | Feb. 1, 2013 |
|
30 | 50 | Rib spalling of 2 m, many working face supports broken, and one day of production stop | Accumulated energy releasing of coal wall induced hard roof rupture | Dynamic load type | 3.22 |
|
||||||||
4 | Mar. 15, 2013 |
|
30 | 40 | 40 m in front of working face; reduction rate of return airway section of 100%, four people dead, 30 days of production stop | Accumulated energy releasing of coal wall induced hard roof rupture | Dynamic load type | 9.27 |
|
||||||||
5 | May 1, 2013 |
|
60 | 35 | Reduction rate of return airway section of 60% | Accumulated energy releasing of coal pillar induced hard roof rupture | Dynamic load type | 6.72 |
Based on the RDE value shown in Table
Rockburst damage potential classification.
RDE | Rockburst damage scale |
---|---|
0 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
5 to 7 |
|
7 to 9 |
|
9 to 10 |
|
Different RDE values can be obtained by putting the five event times into the RDE formula. According to the hazard level in combination with the monitored microearthquake events, the rockburst damage potential classification for other working faces can be predicted, especially for the same mining area.
Rockburst occurrence is closely related to the accumulated energy in the impacting zone. Based on the energy factor, it can be divided to two types including static load type during roadway excavation and dynamic load type during mining face advancing. The first is induced when the roadways excavate high concentration area of tectonic stress. The second occurs when the bending deformation that stored elastic energy of overlying strata induces the compressive elastic energy of coal seam. Compressive elastic energy of coal seam is concentrated due to large area hanging overlying strata applied on the coal seam. Elastic energy of overlying strata is stored in the roof due to the bending deformation of high strength and big thickness hard roof.
The formation process of rockburst during the advance of working face is related to the movement of overlying strata of the stope. The impacting energy generated in hard roof when breaking exceeds the upper limit energy that is stored in stress concentrated area. The criteria for static load type during roadway excavation and dynamic load type during the advance of mining face are built; that is,
The quantitative method to evaluate and predict rockburst damage evaluation level was studied based on the existing rockbursts’ parameters and its hazard appearance. The rockburst is divided into five levels with different RDE values by using the influence of hard roof rupture process on the disturbance of energy accumulated in the area, in combination with previous microearthquake and rockburst events in the mining area. Then the ongoing rockbursts’ hazard level can be predicated.
The work contained in the paper was carried out as part of the of the project titled “
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant no. 51304126, New Teachers’ Fund for Doctor Stations of Ministry of Education under Grant no. 20123718120009, the research fund for excellent young and middle-aged scientists of Shandong Province under Grant no. BS2013NJ007, Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation under Grant no. 141046, Shan Dong University of Science and Technology Outstanding Young Investigator Award under Grant no. 2014JQJH105, Shandong University of Science and Technology Graduate Innovation Fund no. YC150309, a Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program under Grant no. J15LH04, and State Key Laboratory of open funds under Grant no. SKLGDUEK1520. This paper was also supported by “the Tai’shan Scholar Engineering Construction Fund of Shandong Province of China”.