The Scientific World JournalVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 456516, 7 pagesdoi:10.1100/2012/456516

Research Article

Ru (III) Catalyzed Oxidation of Aliphatic Ketones by N-Bromosuccinimide in Aqueous Acetic Acid: A Kinetic Study

P. Giridhar Reddy, K. Ramesh, S. Shylaja, K. C. Rajanna, and S. Kandlikar

Department of Chemistry, Osmania University, Hyderabad 500 007, India

Received 15 October 2011; Accepted 4 January 2012

Academic Editors: V. Capriati and G. Sommen

Copyright © 2012 P. Giridhar Reddy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Kinetics of Ru (III) catalyzed oxidation of aliphatic ketones such as acetone, ethyl methyl ketone, diethyl ketone, iso-butylmethyl ketone by N-bromosuccinimide in the presence of Hg(II) acetate have been studied in aqueous acid medium. The order of [N-bromosuccinimide] was found to be zero both in catalyzed as well as uncatalyzed reactions. However, the order of [ketone] changed from unity to a fractional one in the presence of Ru (III). On the basis of kinetic features, the probable mechanisms are discussed and individual rate parameters evaluated.

1. Introduction

N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) has been used as a brominating and oxidizing agent in synthetic organic chemistry as well as analytical reagent especially in acid medium [1–25]. Recently, NBS has been used for the bromination of some selected organic substrates in which it is used as source for bromine in radical reactions (such as allylic brominations) and various electrophilic additions. The NBS reaction with organic substrates such as alcohols and amines leads to the products of net oxidation followed by elimination of HBr [7–17]. During the past few decades, there has been an upsurge in the designing of a variety of catalysts to explore their utility in synthetic organic chemistry. A number of transition and platinum group metal ions and their complexes have been designed and used as catalysts under homogeneous conditions. Microconcentration of Ru (III) has been found to be an efficient catalyst in a number of redox systems that are reported from our laboratories and elsewhere [26–32]. However, there seems to be no report on Ru (III)-mediated oxidation of ketones by NBS even though few reports are available under uncatalyzed conditions [33–35] by N-bromo compounds. In view of the above, we have studied the kinetics of oxidation of few aliphatic ketones by NBS in aqueous acetic acid solutions under catalytic conditions using microconcentrations of Ru (III) as catalyst.

2. Experimental

2.1. Reagents

All the chemicals used are of analytical grade. Acetic acid was refluxed with chromic oxide and acetic anhydride for 6 h and then fractionally distilled according to literature procedures [36].

2.2. Stoichiometry of the Reaction

Stoichiometry of the reaction was determined by taking known excess of NBS over [ketone] in aqueous acid media at a constant ionic strength (μ) and desired temperature. The progress of the reaction was followed for several days to ensure the completion of the reaction. The unreacted [NBS] in aliquots (5 mL each) was estimated every day till a constancy in the titer value is obtained. Final analysis indicated that one mole of Ketone consumed two moles of NBS.

2.3. Kinetic Method

All kinetic measurements were performed under pseudo-first-order conditions with [Ketone] at least 10-fold in excess over [NBS] at a constant ionic strength (μ) and desired temperature. The reaction was initiated by mixing previously thermostated solutions of NBS and Ketone, which also contained necessary quantities of acid and NaClO₄. The progress of the reaction was followed by iodometric determination of the unreacted [NBS] in aliquots (5 mL each) of the reaction mixture withdrawn into aqueous KI solutions at regular time intervals. The initial rates (V) were evaluated from the tangential slopes of the plots of [NBS] versus time. The initial rate (V) values were reproducible within ±5%. The oxidation product was identified as 1,2-dicarbonyl compound according to standard procedures cited in literature [37].

The effect of dissolved oxygen on the rate of the reaction was studied by preparing the reaction mixture and following the reaction under nitrogen atmosphere. No significant difference between the results obtained under nitrogen atmosphere and those obtained in the presence of atmospheric oxygen was observed. However, fresh solutions were used during the experiments.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Variation of [substrate]

Acetone (MMK), ethyl methyl ketone (EMK), and iso-butyl methyl ketone (IBMK) were used as substrates in the present study. The rate of oxidation increased with an increase in [Substrate] and a first-order dependence in [Substrate] was observed. However, in the presence of Ru (III), the order with respect to [S] changed from unity to a fraction (Table 1). Figure 1 shows the plots of versus [Acetone] for uncatalyzed and Ru (III) catalyzed reactions. The plot of uncatalyzed reaction is linear with an excellent correlationship while the catalyzed plot is a nonlinear curve much above the uncatalyzed plot. However, the reciprocal plot of versus (1/[Ketone]) is linear with excellent correlationship as shown in Figure 2. This observation indicates the formation of intermediate complex [Ru (III)-Substrate].

Table 1: Effect of variation of [substrate] 10² [Hg(OAc)₂] = 2.00 mol dm⁻³; HOAc = 10% (v/v); 10² = 5.00 mol dm⁻³; 10⁵ [Ru (III)] = 2.09 mol dm⁻³; temp = 300 K.

10³

 mol dm⁻³ s⁻¹

            mol dm⁻³
EMK
IBMK

2.00
0.040
0.050
(0.761)
0.725

4.00
0.040
0.051
(0.759)
0.723

5.00
0.040
0.049
(0.762)
0.728

8.00
0.040
0.050
(0.760)
0.720

5.00
0.080
0.102
(1.190)
1.40

5.00
0.100
0.124
(1.330)
1.82
(3.03)

5.00
0.200
0.252
(1.790)
3.62
(4.17)

5.00
0.400
0.503
(2.130)
7.20
(5.00)

5.00
0.500

9.09
(5.55)

*Values presented in the parenthesis indicate Ru (III)-catalyzed redox system.

Figure 1: Plot of versus [acetone] in NBS-acetone reaction 10² [Hg(OAc)₂] = 2.00 mol dm⁻³; HOAc = 10% (v/v); 10² [H+] = 5.00 mol dm⁻³; 10⁵ [Ru (III)] = 2.09 mol dm⁻³; temp = 300 K.

Figure 2: Plot of versus 1/[acetone] in Ru (III) catalyzed NBS-acetone reaction. 10² [Hg(OAc)₂] = 2.00 mol dm⁻³; HOAc = 10% (v/v); 10² [H⁺] = 5.00 mol dm⁻³; 10⁵ [Ru (III)] = 2.09 mol dm⁻³; temp = 300 K.

3.2. Effect of Variation of [Ru (III)]

Highly significant rate (V) accelerations were observed with an increase in [Ru (III)] and the order with respect to [Ru (III)] was found to be unity (Table 2).

Table 2: Effect of variation of [Ru (III)]. 10³ [NBS] = 5.00 mol dm⁻³; 10² [H⁺] = 1.00 mol dm⁻³; [EMK] = 0.100 mol dm⁻³; 10² [Hg(OAc)₂] = 2.00 mol dm⁻³; HOAc = 10% (v/v); temp = 300 K.

10⁵ [Ru (III)]
0.525
1.05
2.09
4.18
5.25

10⁶ V mol dm⁻³ s⁻¹
0.338
0.675
1.35
2.72
3.40

10⁶ V/10⁵ [Ru (III)]
0.644
0.595
0.646
0.650
0.648

3.3. Effect of Variation of Acidity

The reaction rates increased with an increase in acidity ([H⁺]) at constant ionic strength μ in uncatalysed system, that is, first-order dependence on [H⁺], whereas in the case of Ru (III)-catalyzed system, [H⁺] effect is negligible (Table 3).

Table 3: Effect of variation of [H⁺]. 10³ [NBS] = 5.00 mol dm−3; 10² [Hg(OAc)₂] = 2.00 mol dm⁻³; HOAc = 10% (v/v); [EMK] = 0.100 mol dm⁻³; Temp = 300 K; 10⁵ [Ru (III)] = 2.09 mol dm⁻³.

[H⁺] mol dm⁻³
0.010
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100

10⁷ V mol dm⁻³ s⁻¹
0.250
0.520
0.124
1.75
2.50

(13.3)
(13.0)
(13.3)
(13.5)
(13.0)

*Values presented in the parenthesis indicate Ru (III)-catalyzed system.

3.4. Effect of Variation of Mercuric Acetate

A four-fold change (0.02 to 0.08 M) in the concentration of mercuric acetate did not affect the rate of reaction to any considerable extent.

3.5. Effect of Variation of Solvent Composition

The reaction rates were found to increase with an increase in the percentage of acetic acid (Table 4). The increase in the rate of oxidation with increase in the polarity of the medium suggests a more polar transition state than the reactants. The plot of versus the inverse of the relative permittivity is nonlinear. The solvent effect was also analyzed using Grunwald-Winstein equation as cited in literature [38, 39]:

Table 4: Effect of variation of solvent composition. 10³ [NBS] = 5.00 mol dm⁻³; [EMK] = 0.100 mol dm⁻³; Temp = 300 K 10² [Hg(OAc)₂] = 2.00 mol dm⁻³; 10⁶ [Ru (III)] = 5.25 mol dm⁻³.

HOAc % (v/v)
10
20
30
40
50

10⁶ mol dm⁻³ s⁻¹
0.124
0.175
0.220
0.270
0.325

(0.340)
(0.385)
(0.435)
(0.480)
(0.535)

* Values presented in the parenthesis indicate Ru (III)-catalyzed system.

The plot of versus is linear () with . The value of suggests a more polar transition state than the reactants. Thus, a considerable charge separation takes place in the transition state of the reaction.

3.6. Effect of Variation of Temperature

Effect of variation of temperature has been studied to compute activation and thermodynamic parameters. The enthalpy of activation and entropy of activation are computed from Eyring plots of versus (Figures 4 and 5) while free energy of activation is obtained from Gibbs-Helmholtz relationship. The data of activation parameters have been compiled in Tables 5 and 6. The enthalpy and entropy of [Ru (III)-S] complex formation have been obtained from vant Hoff’s equation, while free energy of formation is obtained from vant Hoff’s reaction isotherm.

Table 5: Effect of temperature. Activation Parameters for unanalyzed system.

Parameter
T(K)
Acetone
Ethyl methyl ketone (EMK)
Isobutyl methyl ketone (IBMK)

10⁴(dm³ mol⁻¹ s⁻¹)
290
—
—
1.82

300
0.088
0.248
3.66

310
0.182
0.488
7.36

320
0.384
0.986
—

k J mol⁻¹

56.4
54.9
135

k J mol⁻¹

102
102
93.1

 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹

152
−152
140

Table 6: Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters involving rate constants and formation constants for Ru (III) catalyzed system.

Parameter
T(K)
Acetone
EMK
IBMK

(dm³ mol⁻¹ s⁻¹)
290
—
—
0.137

300
0.033
0.126
0.319

310
0.068
0.412
0.957

320
0.165
1.19
—

 k J mol⁻¹

61.8
86.3
70.2

 k J mol⁻¹

81.9
78.4
76.3

 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹

−67.0
25.0
−20.3

 dm³ mol⁻¹
290
—
—
12.5

300
63.5
10.3
7.50

310
56.0
4.51
3.10

320
32.2
2.22
—

 k J mol⁻¹

27.1
59.4
52.2

 k J mol⁻¹

10.4
3.89
5.05

 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹

55.6
179
157

3.7. Mechanism of Oxidation in Uncatalyzed Reaction

In order to gain an insight into the mechanistic path, it is essential to know the nature of the reactive oxidizing and reducing species. NBS is known to exist in three forms in acid media, namely, NBS itself, NBSH⁺ (protonated NBS) and bromonium ion (Br⁺). Since all the kinetic studies are conducted in the presence of mercuric acetate, the liberated Br₂ during the course of the reaction according to (2) can be removed in the form of or HgBr₂ complexes because Hg (OAc) 2 acts as a scavenger for Br⁻ formed in the reaction:

In acid media, ketones are protonated to yield oxonium salts. Since oxygen is more electronegative than carbon, the first resonating structure (I) makes a larger contribution than the second (II):

This discussion together with the observed kinetics, namely, first-order dependence on [ketone] as well as [H⁺] and zero-order dependence on [NBS] substantiate a mechanism comprising the enolisation step prior to the slowest step as shown in Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

This mechanism is similar to the one proposed by Litter and Waters [14–17] in the case of two electrons abstracting oxidation process. Participation of ion in the rate-limiting step can be further supported from negligible salt effect and enhanced rates in the solvents of low dielectric constant. Rate law, for the above mechanism, comes out as where . This rate expression is consistent with observed kinetics, namely, zero order with respect to [NBS] and first order in [ketone] as well as [H⁺]. The kinetic and activation parameters presented in the table indicate that the second-order rate constant is almost doubled with a 10° (ten degrees) rise in temperature. The free energy of activation of the present study fits well with the one reported by [18–25, 33] (23.0 K cal/mol) in the oxidation of diethyl ketone by NBS in acid medium which depicts the validity of a similar mechanism being operative in the NBS oxidation of ethyl methyl ketone (EMK) and iso-butyl methyl ketone (IBMK). A perusal of kinetic constants compiled in Table 5 indicates that the rate of oxidation follows the sequence: IBMK > EMK > MMK which may be attributed to the increased +I effect (inductive effect) due to an increase in electron cloud in the vicinity of alkyl groups present in EMK and IBMK. This can be also evidenced by values (Table 5) which follow the order: IBMK > EMK > MMK. By and large values also show a similar trend. Then, the trend exhibited by agrees with that of second-order rate constants. Thus it is not unjustifiable to say that the reactions are entropy controlled.

3.8. Mechanism of Oxidation in the Presence of Ru (III)

The absence of free radicals, zero-order dependence on [oxidant] and that in [ketone] is changed from unity to a fraction from the uncatalysed system to Ru (III)-catalyzed system [18–25]. Such a change in the reaction order of [S] from uncatalyzed to catalyzed system usually points out the intermediate complex formation either with metal ion or NBS itself, but the zero-order dependence of NBS rules out complexation between NBS and ketone. Ultimately, one can visualize the complex formation of ketone with Ru (III). The Ru (III) employed in the system are known to form adduct with organic compounds due to the partially filled d-orbitals. Complexation between ketone and Ru (III) appears, therefore, most likely. Negligible acidity and salt effects probably suggest the keto form to be active in the study. However, the solvent effect studies point out that the reaction rate is faster in the solvent of low dielectric constant thus indicating the participation of ionic species in the rate limiting step. The most probable mechanism in Ru (III)-catalyzed system can be traced as in Scheme 1 by taking ethyl methyl ketone as a typical substrate.

Scheme 1. where : Carbonium ion intermediate. Rate law for the mechanism was derived as

The reciprocals of (6) demand that plot of versus (1/[Ketone]) should be linear with positive slope and intercept on ordinate. Such plots have been realized in this study with excellent correlationship as shown in Figure 2, showing the validity proposed mechanism given in Scheme 1. The decomposition constant () and formation constant () for [Ru (III)-Ketone] adducts are evaluated from the intercept and slopes of these plots. Thermodynamic parameters pertaining to the formation constant are evaluated from known procedures and compiled in Table 6. It is interesting to note that Ru (III)-catalyzed rate of oxidation of IBMK is almost ten times greater than that of acetone (MMK) as evidenced from the magnitude of decomposition constant () values (IBMK > EMK > MMK presented in Table 6). This may be explained due to the increased + I effect due to an increased electron cloud of alkyl group in IBMK compared to MMK or EMK. However, this trend cannot be supported by either enthalpy of activation or entropy of activation because none of these parameters indicated a regular pattern, but according to Hinshelwood’s classification of reaction series, it appears that both and is important in controlling the reaction rate in the present study. Further, the negative entropies if activation data presented in Table 5 show that the transition state of uncatalyzed reaction is by large rigid due to salvation (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Eyring’s plot of versus (uncatalyzed reaction). (A) Acetone (B) EMK (C) IBMK.

Figure 4: Eyring’s plot of versus for Ru (III) catalyzed reaction. Reaction (A) Acetone (B) EMK (C) IBMK.

Figure 5: vant Hoff’s plot of versus for Ru (III) catalyzed reaction. (A) Acetone (B) EMK (C) IBMK.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, rate of oxidation of aliphatic ketones such as acetone, ethyl methyl ketone, iso-butylmethyl ketone by N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) has been dramatically accelerated by trace amounts (micro concentrations) of Ru (III) in acid medium. Kinetic studies indicated zero order in [NBS] in Ru (III)-catalyzed as well as uncatalyzed reactions. However, the order of [Ketone] changed from unity to a fraction in the presence of Ru (III). Mechanism of oxidation was explained through the formation of [Ru (III)-Ketone] precursor prior to rate-limiting step. According to Hinshelwood’s classification of reaction series, present set of reactions appear to fall into the third category of reaction series, in which both and are important in controlling the reaction rate.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to tank Professor T. Navaneeth Rao (former Vice-chancellor) and Professor P. K. Saiprakash (former Dean, Faculty of Science), Osmania University, Hyderabad, for constant encouragement and helpful discussions and Principal, Nizam College, Hyderabad, for providing necessary facilities during the part of this work.

References

R. Filler, “Oxidations and dehydrogenations with N-bromosuccinimide and related N-haloimides,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 63, pp. 21–43, 1963.

N. K. Mathur and C. K. Narang, The Determination of Organic Compounds with NBS and Allied Reagents, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1975.

D. L. Kamble, G. H. Hugar, and S. T. Nandibewoor, “Kinetics of oxidation of chromium(III) by N-bromosuccinimide in aqueous alkaline medium,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 144–147, 1996.

D. L. Kamble, R. B. Chougale, and S. T. Nandibewoor, “Kinetic and mechanism of uncatalyzed and Ru (III) catalyzed oxidation of allyl alcohol by N-bromosuccinimide in aqueous alkaline medium,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 35, pp. 865–869, 1996.

P. Saroja, B. Kishore Kumar, and S. Kandlikar, “Kinetic and mechanism of uncatalyzed and Ir (III) catalyzed oxidation of oxalate ion by N-bromosuccinimide in basic medium,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 28, p. 501, 1989.

S. K. Mavalangi, M. R. Kembhavi, and S. T. Nandibewoor, “Oxidation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid by N-bromosuccinimide in aqueous alkaline medium—a kinetic study,” Turkish Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 355–363, 2001.

M. Narender, M. Somi Reddy, and K. Rama Rao, “A mild and efficient oxidative deprotection of THP ethers with NBS in the presence of β-cyclodextrin in water,” Synthesis, no. 11, pp. 1741–1743, 2004.

L. X. Shao and M. Shi, “N-bromosuccinimide and lithium bromide: an efficient combination for the dibromination of carbon-carbon unsaturated bonds,” Synlett, no. 8, pp. 1269–1271, 2006.

X. Huang and W. J. Fu, “Stereoselective aminobromination of alkylidenecyclopropanes with TsNH 2 and NBS as nitrogen and bromine sources: a simple access to γ-bromohomoallylic sulfonamides,” Synthesis, no. 6, pp. 1016–1020, 2006.

N. C. Ganguly, P. De, and S. Dutta, “Mild regioselective monobromination of activated aromatics and heteroaromatics with N-bromosuccinimide in tetrabutylammonium bromide,” Synthesis, no. 7, pp. 1103–1108, 2005.

K. Rajesh, M. Somasundaram, R. Saiganesh, and K. K. Balasubramanian, “Bromination of deactivated aromatics: a simple and efficient method,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 72, no. 15, pp. 5867–5869, 2007.

G. K. S. Prakash, T. Mathew, D. Hoole et al., “N-halosuccinimide/BF₃-H₂O, efficient electrophilic halogenating systems for aromatics,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 48, pp. 15770–15776, 2004.

C. Thiebes, G. K. S. Prakash, N. A. Petasis, and G. A. Olah, “Mild preparation of haloarenes by ipso-substitution of arylboronic acids with N-halosuccinimides,” Synlett, no. 2, pp. 141–142, 1998.

J. Prakash Das and S. Roy, “Catalytic Hunsdiecker reaction of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids: how efficient is the catalyst?” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 22, pp. 7861–7864, 2002.

C. Kuang, Q. Yang, H. Senboku, and M. Tokuda, “Stereoselective synthesis of (E)-β-arylvinyl bromides by microwave-induced Hunsdiecker-type reaction,” Synthesis, no. 8, pp. 1319–1325, 2005.

S. Hajra, B. Maji, and S. Bar, “Samarium triflate-catalyzed halogen-promoted Friedel-Crafts alkylation with alkenes,” Organic Letters, vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 2783–2786, 2007.

S. Hajra, D. Sinha, and M. Bhowmick, “Metal triflate catalyzed reactions of alkenes, NBS, nitriles, and TMSN₃: synthesis of 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1852–1855, 2007.

G. S. Sundaram and N. Venkatasubramanian, “Oxidation of diphenylmethanol by bromamine-T. A kinetic and mechanistic study,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions, vol. 2, pp. 949–953, 1983.

J. P. Sharma, R. N. P. Singh, A. K. Singh, and B. Singh, “Kinetics and mechanism of Ru(III) catalysed oxidation of some polyhydric alcohols by N-bromosuccinimide in acidic media,” Tetrahedron, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2739–2747, 1986.

R. Ramachandrappa, M. Puttaswamy, S. M. Mayanna, and N. M. Made Gowda, “Kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of aspirin by bromamine-T, N-bromosuccinimide, and N-bromophthalimide,” International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 407–414, 1998.

A. L. Harihar, M. R. Kembhavi, and S. T. Nandibewoor, “Kinetics and mechanism of N-bromosuccinimide oxidation of L-arginine in aqueous acidic medium,” Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 128–130, 1999.

A. K. Singh, S. Rahmani, V. K. Singh, V. Gupta, D. Kesarwani, and B. Singh, “Iridium (III) catalysis of N-bromosuccinimide oxidation of reducing sugars in aqueous acid,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 519–523, 2001.

C. Karunakaran and K. Ganapathy, “Kinetic study on the reaction of N-bromosuccinimide with β, γ-unsaturated alcohols in aqueous acetic acid,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 29, p. 133, 1990.

N. Venkatasubramanian and V. Thiagarajan, “The mechanism of oxidation of alcohols by bromine,” Canadian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 47, p. 694, 1969.

N. A. Mohamed Farook, “Kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of 4-oxoacids by N-bromosuccinimide in aqueous acetic acid medium,” Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 378–386, 2006.

P. G. Reddy, Y. Ramesh, and S. Kandlikar, “Ru (III) catalyzed oxidation of ethanolamine, diethanolamine and tri ethanolamine by N-bromosuccinimide -A kinetic study,” Oxidation Communications, vol. 7, p. 89, 1984.

P. G. Reddy, A. V. Reddy, A. Ratnamala, S. V. Rao, and S. Kandlikar, “Ru(III) catalyzed oxidation of some aliphatic alcohols by N-bromosuccinimide (NBS). A kinetic study,” Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 209–213, 1984.

G. Caroling, J. Rajaram, and J. C. Kuriacose, “Kinetics and mechanism of Ru(III)-catalysed oxidation of organic sulphides and triphenylphosphine by N-methylmorpholine N-oxide,” Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 1988.

M. D. Prasada Rao, M. Ahmad, P. K. Pujapanda, and T. K. Kanungo, “Ru(III)-catalyzed oxidation of acetanilide, o-chloroacetanilide, p-chloroacetanilide and p-methylacetanilide by sodium perioda'te at pH 4,” Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 375–379, 1984.

K. N. Shivananda, B. Lakshmi, R. V. Jagadeesh, Puttaswamy, and K. N. Mahendra, “Mechanistic studies on the Ru(III)-catalyzed oxidation of some aromatic primary diamines by chloramine-T in hydrochloric acid medium: a kinetic approach,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 326, no. 2, pp. 202–212, 2007.

K. N. Shivananda, R. V. Jagadeesh, Puttaswamy, and K. N. Mahendra, “Ru(III)-catalysed oxidation of some amines by chloramine-T in hydrochloric acid medium: mechanistic aspects and kinetic modeling,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 255, no. 1-2, pp. 159–170, 2006.

R. Saxena and S. K. Upadhyay, “Kinetics and mechanism of the ruthenium(III)-catalyzed oxidation of hydroxy-acids by N-bromosuccinimide,” Transition Metal Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 245–248, 1991.

S. P. Mushran , K. Singh, L. Pandey, and S. M. Pandey, “Kinetic study of oxidation of cycloheptanone by N-bromosuccinimide in acidic media,” Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, vol. 46, p. 119, 1980.

K. Singh, J. N. Tiwari, and S. P. Mushran, “Kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of diethyl ketone by N-bromosuccinimide,” International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, vol. 10, p. 995, 1978.

B. Singh and R. Chand, “Kinetics and mechanism of bromamine-T oxidation of some cyclic ketones in acidic media,” Tetrahedron, vol. 41, no. 14, pp. 2871–2873, 1985.

K. J. P. Orton and A. E. Bradfield, “The purification of acetic acid. The estimation of acetic anhydride in acetic acid,” Journal of Chemical Society, pp. 983–985, 1927.

F. Feigl, Spot Tests in Organic Analysis, Elsevier, London, UK, 1966.

A. H. Fainberg and S. Winstein, “Correlation of solvolysis rates. III. T-butyl Chloride in a wide range of solvent mixtures,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 2770–2777, 1956.

K. B. Wiberg, Physical Organic Chemistry, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1963.