The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 479315, 8 pages

doi:10.1100/2012/479315

Research Article

Selection of the In Vitro Culture Media Influences mRNA Expression of Hedgehog Genes, Il-6, and Important Genes regarding Reactive Oxygen Species in Single Murine Preimplantation Embryos

N. Pfeifer,¹ D. M. Baston-Büst,¹ J. Hirchenhain,¹ U. Friebe-Hoffmann,¹ D. T. Rein,² J. S. Krüssel,¹ and A. P. Hess¹

¹Department of OB/GYN and REI (UniKiD), Medical Center University of Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

²St. Elisabeth Hospital Hohenlind, Department of OB/GYN, Werthmannstr. 1, 50935 Köln, Germany

Received 28 March 2012; Accepted 22 April 2012

Academic Editors: S. Roy and Q. Y. Sun

Copyright © 2012 N. Pfeifer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. The aim of this paper was to determine the influence of different in vitro culture media on mRNA expression of Hedgehog genes, il-6, and important genes regarding reactive oxygen species in single mouse embryos. Methods. Reverse transcription of single embryos either cultured in vitro from day 0.5 until 3.5 (COOK’s Cleavage medium or Vitrolife’s G-1 PLUS medium) or in vivo until day 3.5 post coitum. PCR was carried out for β-actin followed by nested-PCR for shh, ihh, il-6, nox, gpx4, gpx1, and prdx2. Results. The number of murine blastocysts cultured in COOK medium which expressed il-6, gpx4, gpx1, and prdx2 mRNA differed significantly compared to the in vivo group. Except for nox, the mRNA profile of the Vitrolife media group embryos varied significantly from the in vivo ones regarding the number of blastocysts expressing the mRNA of shh, ihh, il-6, gpx4, gpx1 and prdx2. Conclusions. The present study shows that different in vitro culture media lead to different mRNA expression profiles during early development. Even the newly developed in vitro culture media are not able to mimic the female reproductive tract. The question of long-term consequences for children due to assisted reproduction techniques needs to be addressed in larger studies.

1. Introduction

Since 1978, about 10 million children all over the world were born after applying assisted reproduction technique (ART). Therefore, 1–3% of all babies born in developed countries result from the use of ART. Besides optimizing the technique of ART to improve pregnancy rates, it is also important to consider risks of the therapy itself as well as possible long-term consequences for those children. Although human IVF procedure is constantly improved by implementation of innovative techniques and new scientific results regarding the preimplantation development, the current methods do not succeed in mimicking the in vivo situation completely. Therefore, knowledge about factors which regulate the preimplantation development is of great interest.

The components of the medium in which the embryo is cultured as well as the oxygen concentration of the in vitro culture play important roles in mimicking the female reproductive tract and therewith influence the gene expression of the preimplantation embryo [1, 2]. Development of the sequential media system already respects the changing metabolism of the preimplantation embryo with regard to glucose concentration, amino acids, and ph within its development to a blastocyst [3]. Physiologically, the preimplantation embryo develops in hypoxic condition within the reproductive tract (oxygen concentration: oviduct 8%, uterus 1.5%) whereas in vitro embryos are cultured with atmospheric oxygen tension (oxygen concentration: 20%). High oxygen concentration results in generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Besides the capability of ROS to damage cell function by modifying the structure of lipids, proteins and DNA causing strand breaks and inactivation of enzymes, ROS serve as key signalling molecules in physiological processes and are essential for embryogenesis by regulating cell proliferation and intracellular signal transduction pathways. In order to optimize the in vitro culture system, the oxygen concentration might be reduced by either culturing the embryo under hypoxic conditions or by adding antioxidants to the culture media.

The early embryo development from the zygote to the blastocyst stage and the implantation are complex processes with morphological and dynamic changes in the surrounding and the metabolism of the embryo. A large number of genes are involved in the early embryo development regulating immunomodulation, angiogenesis, and cell proliferation. Genes of the Hedgehog family—Sonic Hedgehog (shh) and Indian Hedgehog (ihh)—are essential for a regular early embryo development. Shh and ihh encode proteins which regulate cell proliferation and differentiation during the early embryo development and homeostasis of adult tissues [4]. Shh acts as a morphogen governing the pattern of neural tube development as well as patterning and midlining of somites and limbs. Ihh regulates ossification and is expressed in the endoderm.

The cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a well-established angiogenic factor during the implantation process of the murine embryo controlling the formation of a capillary network in the maternal decidua following embryonic implantation [5].

NADPH oxidase (NOX) producing ROS endogenously is involved in the immune defence of macrophages against bacteria. Glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and peroxiredoxin (PRDX) belonging to the cellular response against ROS are localized ubiquitously. Regulating the cell functions, PRDX plays an important role in cell differentiation, intracellular signal transduction pathways, and apoptosis [6]. For example, an upregulation of PRDX2 was demonstrated in murine testis after radiation [7].

With respect to the important roles of shh, ihh, and il-6 during early embryo development and possible alterations in neural tube development, bone development or angiogenesis during early embryo development as well as the relevance of nox, gpx4, gpx1, and prdx2 concerning ROS and feasible modifications in the antioxidant system, knowledge of their gene expression in blastocysts, and a potential influence of in vitro culture is of great interest. The aim of this study was to investigate shh, ihh and il-6 and nox, gpx4, gpx1 and prdx2 mRNA expression in single murine blastocysts to evaluate a possible impact of in vitro culture compared to in vivo development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Planning and conduction of the experimental procedures as well as maintenance of the animals was carried out in accordance to the German Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory animals and according to the ethics board of the Heinrich-Heine University. Female, 12-week-old mice of the B6129F1 strain were obtained from Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. (Wilmington, MA, USA) and maintained at 22–24°C on a 12 h light 12 h dark cycle. Female mice were superovulated by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 10 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG, Sigma-Aldrich, München, Germany). 48 h after PMSG, ovulation was induced by i.p. injection of 10 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, Sigma-Aldrich). Female mice were impregnated by 12-week-old fertile males of the same strain. A single male was placed with two females overnight. Mating was verified by the appearance of a vaginal plug on the following morning.

2.2. Zygote Recovery and Embryo Culture

For in vitro culturing, mated mice were sacrified by cervical dislocation 12 h after hCG injection. Ovaries and oviduct were removed and washed with universal IVF medium (Medicult, Jyllinge, Denmark) with 80 IU/mL hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich). Cumulus-zygote complexes were extracted from the swollen parts of the ampulla by incubation with 80 IU/mL hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 min and gentle suction through a Pasteur pipette (Reproline Medical GmbH, Rheinbach, Germany). Cumulus-free zygotes were transferred to a culture dish (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) and cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂/95% ambient air. The dishes were prepared as follows: 25 L IVF medium—either COOK’s Cleavage medium or the Vitrolife’s G-1 PLUS medium which is supplemented with the strong antioxidant lipoate—was covered with mineral oil (Gynemed, Lensahn, Germany). Embryos, cultured in groups of 5, were observed regularly every day to monitor their development and eliminated in case of an developmental arrest. The corresponding in vivo blastocysts for comparison were removed 90 h after hCG injection after mice were sacrified by cervical dislocation. Uteri were flushed with a microneedle containing universal IVF medium (Medicult) under visual control. For further experiments, single blastocysts were transferred into thin wall PCR tubes (Sarstedt AG, Nümbrecht, Germany). After reverse transcription (RT), reaction single embryos were examined for mRNA-levels of β-actin, shh, ihh, il-6, nox, gpx4, gpx1, and prdx2 by two rounds of nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Table 1).

Table 1: Sequences of oligonucleotides and annealing temperature used in reverse transcription and nested-PCR.

mRNA
Nested PCR
Annealing temperature (°C)
Size of the fragment (bp)
3′-/5′-end
Sequence of oligonucleotide 5′→3′

β-actin X03672

54
407
5′
CAA GGT GTG ATG GTG GGA ATG G

3′
CAG GAT GGC GTG AGG GAG AGC A

shh NM_009170
Outer pair
55
530
5′
GAG ACC CAA CTC CGA TGT GT

3′
GAT GTC GGG GTT GTA ATT GG

Inner pair
56
150
5′
CTG GCC AGA TGT TTT CTG GT

3′
CTC GGC TAC GTT GGG AAT AA

ihh NM_010544
Outer pair
58
438
5′
CAC TTG TGG TGG AGA TGT G

3′
TAC CAC ACG CTT GTC AGC TC

Inner pair
53
106
5′
CTC TAA CCA CTG CCC TCC TG

3′
AGA GGA CGG AGA CAA CCT CA

il-6 NM_031168
Outer pair
56
339
5′
GTT CTC TGG GAA ATC GTG GA

3′
GGA AAT TGG GGT AGG AAG GA

Inner pair
56
226
5′
TGT GCA ATG GCA ATT CTG AT

3′
CTC TGA AGG ACT CTG GCT TTG

nox NM_172203
Outer pair
59
683
5′
GGG ATG ACC ATA AGG GGA GT

3′
CCA GCC AGT GAG GAA GAG AC

Inner pair
59
216
5′
TCC ATT TCC TTC CTG GAG TG

3′
CCC AAC CAG TAC AGC CAC TT

gpx4 NM_001037741
Outer pair
58
410
5′
AGT ACA GGG GTT TCG TGT GC

3′
CGG CAG GTC CTT CTC TAT CA

Inner pair
57
166
5′
CCG GCT ACA ACG TCA AGT TT

3′
ACG CAG CCG TTC TTA TCA AT

gpx1 NM_008160
Outer pair
58
847
5′
GTC CAC CGT GTA TGC CTT CT

3′
TCG ATG TCG ATG GTA CGA AA

Inner pair
45
278
5′
GGT TCG AGC CCA ATT TTA CA

3′
GGG CAC GCG TCC ATG TCG GC

prdx2 NM_011563
Outer pair
56
946
5′
TAG GGC TCT CTC GGT TTT GA

3′
TTG ACT GTG ATC TGG CGA AG

Inner pair
56
179
5′
GGT GCC TTC AAG GAA ATC AA

3′
GCC TAG CTT TCG GAA GTC CT

2.3. Reverse Transcription Reaction

For each single embryo, 18 L RT mastermix was prepared containing 10 × RT buffer, 25 × dNTPs (each 100 mM), 10 × RT-random primer and DEPC-treated dH₂O ad 18 L (High capacity cDNA Archive Kit 432217, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). This RT mastermix was added to a PCR tube (Sarstedt AG) with a single embryo in 1 L media, covered with light weight PCR mineral oil (Sigma-Aldrich) and kept on ice until RNA extraction. In this study complete single embryos were used. For RNA extraction, samples were heated up to 99°C for 1 min in a DNA thermocycler (UNOII, T-Gradient, Biometra GmbH, Goettingen, Germany) for total RNA release and denaturation of protein. Samples were cooled down to 4°C, and 50 U/L Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase (High capacity cDNA Archive Kit 432217, Applied Biosystems) was added to each reaction. The protocol for RT was completed as follows: 25°C for 10 min, 37°C for 60 min, 4°C for ∞. After the reaction was finalized, samples were diluted with DEPC-treated dH₂O ad 50 L and stored at −20°C until the PCR reaction was carried out.

2.4. Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

A total of 5 L for β-actin, shh, ihh, il-6, nox, and gpx1 of diluted RT product was added to 20 L of specific PCR-1-mix for β-actin, shh, ihh, il-6, nox, and gpx1. 2 L for gpx4 and prdx2 of diluted RT product was added to 23 L of specific PCR-1-mix for gpx4 and prdx2. The PCR Master Mix (2×) contained MgCl₂, PCR buffer, dNTPs each 0.04 mM and 0.05 U/L Taq-DNA-polymerase, outer primer pair mix each 0.3 M and DEPC-treated dH₂O ad 25 L (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Deutschland). In a DNA thermocycler, the PCR-1-mix was heated to 95°C for 5 min to activate the hot-start enzyme and 40 cycles (β-actin, shh, ihh, il-6, nox, gpx4, gpx1 (35 cycles prdx2)) of 94°C for 30 sec, annealing temperature listed in Table 1 for 45 sec and 72°C for 60 sec were completed. After terminating the reaction at 72°C for 5 min, the samples were cooled down to 4°C for ∞. First round PCR products were stored at −20°C until the second PCR was carried out.

For the second PCR, 5 L (2 L) of the first round PCR product was added to 20 L (23 L) PCR-2-mix (PCR Master Mix (2×) and DEPC-treated dH₂O ad 25 L). Program parameters were identical to the first round protocol except annealing temperatures (see Table 1). Samples were stored at −20°C until agarose gel electrophoresis was carried out. Although the use of two nested primer pairs should yield in a high specificity for the amplified cDNA, we additionally confirmed the identity of the amplicons by sequence analysis (data not shown) (biomedical research center of the Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany).

2.5. Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

In the presence of ethidiumbromide (0.5 g/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich) horizontal 2% agarose gel electrophoresis was carried out. A DNA marker (Biozym Scientific GmbH) was used to determine the sizes of the amplified fragments. The agarose gel was analyzed with the GelDoc 1000 system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Expression of the investigated mRNAs was encoded as 0, nondetectable, and 1, detectable, for each single embryo. To evaluate the statistical significance of the different mRNA expression of in vivo and in vitro cultured embryos at 90 h following hCG injection, Student’s -test was carried out with *; ** and ***.

3. Results

A total number of 276 single blastocysts (106 in vivo blastocysts, 170 in vitro blastocysts) were examined for β-actin-, shh, ihh, il-6, nox, gpx4, gpx1, and prdx2 mRNA expression. The in vitro blastocysts were divided into two groups; 92 blastocysts were cultured in COOK Cleavage medium and 78 blastocysts in Vitrolife G-1 PLUS. The blastocysts resulted from a total number of 140 zygotes in each medium (Table 2).

Table 2: Number of zygotes developed to blastocyst in correlation with gene expression of the mRNAs of interest.

In vivo
In vitro in COOK cleavage medium
In vitro in Vitrolife’s G-1 PLUS medium

Number of zygotes
unknown
140
140

Number of good quality blastocysts
106
92
78

No. of blastocyst with detectable mRNA expression of

     β-actin
106/106
92/92
78/78

    shh
8/106
12/92
17/78

    ihh
4/106
10/92
26/78

    il-6
27/106
72/92
43/78

    nox
0/106
2/92
1/78

    gpx4
98/106
92/92
77/78

    gpx1
42/106
79/92
72/78

    prdx2
39/106
91/92
76/78

All blastocysts—cultured in vivo and in vitro—were positive for the housekeeping gene β-actin and of good quality. DEPC-H₂O was used as negative and splenic cDNA as positive control. Only blastocysts with a regular morphology were included in the study. Every day the development of the in vitro cultured murine embryos was controlled and examined with an inverse microscope before the reverse transcription was performed. The experimental time course from stimulation of female mice, isolation of embryos, and their early development is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Overview representing experimental time course from stimulation of female mice, isolation of embryos, and their early development (modified after [8]).

3.1. mRNA Expression of shh and ihh in Single Murine Preimplantation Embryos

All 276 single blastocysts of the three groups were examined for their mRNA expression of both hh genes. 8% of the in vivo blastocysts expressed shh mRNA and 4% ihh mRNA. In the COOK medium group 13% of shh mRNA and 11% of ihh mRNA could be detected whereas in the Vitrolife medium group 22% of the blastocysts expressed shh mRNA and 33% ihh mRNA. The -test showed a highly significant difference with *** for both shh and ihh in the group cultured in Vitrolife medium compared to the in vivo group. The blastocysts cultured in the COOK medium showed no significant difference for shh and ihh mRNA compared to the in vivo group. Moreover, ihh showed a highly significant difference of mRNA expression between both in vitro groups with more blastocysts expressing ihh mRNA in the Vitrolife group (***) (Tables 2 and 3, Figure 2).

Table 3: Frequency of detection of β-actin, shh, ihh, il-6, nox, gpx4, gpx1, and prdx2 mRNA in single murine blastocyst with β-actin as internal standard.

Specific mRNA expression (%)
β-actin
shh
ihh
il-6
nox
gpx4
gpx1
prdx2

In vivo cultured embryos
100
8
4
25
0
92
40
37

In vitro cultured embryos (COOK)
100
13
11
78
2
100
86
99

In vitro cultured embryos (Vitrolife)
100
22
33
55
1
99
92
97

Figure 2: Quantitative analysis of mRNA expression of shh, and ihh of single murine blastocyst either cultured in vivo (white) or in vitro in COOK’s Cleavage medium (grey) or in Vitrolife’s G-1 PLUS medium (black) compared to β-actin as housekeeping gene with *; **; ***.

3.2. mRNA Expression of il-6 in Single Murine Preimplantation Embryos

All three collectives of single murine blastocysts were examined for il-6 mRNA expression. 25% () of the in vivo blastocysts compared to 78% () and 55% () of the in vitro groups expressed il-6 mRNA (COOK and Vitrolife, resp.). The -test showed a highly significant difference of il-6 mRNA expression with *** between both in vitro groups compared to the in vivo group as well as between the two in vitro groups with a higher number of blastocysts expressing il-6 mRNA in the COOK medium group (Tables 2 and 3, Figure 3).

Figure 3: Quantitative analysis of mRNA expression of il-6 of single murine blastocyst either cultured in vivo (white) or in vitro in COOK’s Cleavage medium (grey) or in Vitrolife’s G-1 PLUS medium (black) compared to β-actin as housekeeping gene with *; **; ***.

3.3. mRNA Expression of nox, gpx4, gpx1, and prdx2 in Single Murine Preimplantation Embryos

The detection of nox mRNA transcript was comparable with no statistical significant difference in all three groups (in vivo: 0% (); in vitro COOK: 2% (); in vitro Vitrolife: 1% ()).

Gpx4 mRNA transcripts could be detected in all three groups in more than 90% of the blastocysts (in vivo: 92% (); in vitro COOK: 100% (); in vitro Vitrolife: 99% ()], whereas the COOK medium group showed in the t-test a highly significant difference with *** for gpx4 mRNA compared to the in vivo group. In the group cultured in Vitrolife medium the t-test represents a high significant difference with ** for gpx4 mRNA compared to the in vivo group.

Gpx1 mRNA was found in 42 of 106 in vivo blastocysts (40%). In contrast, the in vitro blastocysts showed a much higher number of gpx1 mRNA transcripts. 79 of 92 (86%) murine blastocysts of the COOK and 72 of 78 (92%) murine blastocysts of the Vitrolife medium group expressed gpx1 mRNA.

Prdx2 mRNA expression was comparable to the gpx1 results with 91 of 92 (99%) blastocysts of the COOK and 76 of 78 (97%) of the Vitrolife medium group, whereas only 37% () of the in vivo group blastocysts showed Prdx mRNA expression (all results displayed in Figure 4, Tables 2 and 3).

Figure 4: Quantitative analysis of mRNA expression of nox, gpx4, gpx1 and prdx2 of single murine blastocyst either cultured in vivo (white) or in vitro in COOK’s Cleavage medium (grey) or in Vitrolife’s G-1 PLUS medium (black) compared to β-actin as housekeeping gene with *; **; ***.

4. Discussion

A growing body of evidence in the literature suggests that in vitro culture of preimplantation embryos as widely used in ART is influencing the gene expression [9–14]. Moreover, different in vitro culture systems showed modified patterns of gene expression. Rinaudo and Schultz [1] described that important genes involved in protein synthesis, cell proliferation, and transporter functions were changed after in vitro culture in murine embryos compared to the in vivo group and the usage of two different culture media led to different gene expression profiles.

Thus, the environment of the preimplantation embryo seems to have an important impact on gene expression and embryo development.

The oxygen concentration and ROS regulate different cellular signal transduction pathways, for example, hypoxia inducible factor family or nuclear factor κB and metabolic processes like glucose transport or glycolysis [15–17]. Physiologically, the early embryo development takes place in a surrounding area of 5% oxygen in comparison with an atmospheric oxygen of 20% during the in vitro culture in many times. Many data pointed out that the hypoxic condition of the in vitro culture improves the embryo development in mouse, cattle, and human compared with atmospheric tension, for example, by reducing the generation of ROS [18–21].

In order to maintain the balance of ROS and antioxidants, recently, antioxidants are added to the culture media. The addition of cysteine as a scavenger to the culture system improved the development of bovine embryos, whereas the addition of antioxidant enzymes like catalase or superoxide dismutase showed no benefit [22, 23]. As there are contradictory data concerning the addition of antioxidants to culture media, it is important to gain more insight into their relevance concerning the choice and concentration of the respective antioxidant [24–26].

In the present study, the majority of genes (il-6, shh, ihh, gpx1, gpx4, prdx2) showed an altered pattern of mRNA expression in the Vitrolife medium cultured blastocysts compared to the in vivo blastocysts. Although the in vitro blastocysts of the COOK medium group expressed no different shh and ihh mRNA profile compared to the in vivo group, the other genes showed a modified mRNA expression in the COOK medium cultured blastocysts as well. Only the nox mRNA expression of the in vitro blastocysts was similar to that of the in vivo group in both in vitro groups. These findings are concordant with the studies of Rinaudo and Schultz [1] demonstrating that not only the in vitro blastocysts show a modified mRNA expression pattern compared to the in vivo blastocysts but also that the use of varying culture media leads to a different pattern of gene expression according to the media used.

As the number of shh mRNA positive murine blastocysts in the COOK medium group showed no significant difference compared to the in vivo group, but the number of shh mRNA positive murine blastocysts in the Vitrolife medium group was significantly increased compared to the in vivo group, one can hypothesize that the components of the Vitrolife medium lead to an increased number of shh mRNA positive murine blastocysts. As Nguyen et al. [27] described an antiapoptotic function of SHH, the in vitro culture medium supplemented by antioxidants could possibly cause stress in the murine embryo resulting in an increased shh mRNA expression in order to avoid DNA strand breaks.

Becker et al. showed that only little ihh mRNA can be detected in the early murine blastocyst, which increases in concordance with the developmental process, especially with the development of the extraembryonic endoderm, where ihh displays a decisive function [28]. Furthermore, IHH induces the endothelial cell production in murine yolk sac tissue and plays an important role in the development of the earliest hematovascular system [29]. Although IHH exhibits important key functions considering the early development, the influence of the in vitro culture on ihh mRNA expression was not yet examined. In this study, the investigated blastocysts showed an increased number of ihh mRNA positive murine blastocysts in the Vitrolife medium group compared to the in vivo group similar to the results of the shh mRNA expression, whereas the number of ihh mRNA positive murine blastocysts in the COOK medium group showed no significant difference compared to the in vivo group. The significantly increased number of ihh mRNA positive murine blastocysts in the Vitrolife group raises concern with regard to possible disturbances of the early embryonic development. Since investigations of mice as well as IHH overexpression in the chicken model showed growth defects with hypertrophic chondrocytes and abnormal limbs, the significant increased number of ihh mRNA positive murine blastocysts in the Vitrolife medium group might influence the growth pattern of the affected blastocysts [30–32].

Moreover, the progesterone-dependent ihh production in the endometrium which increases during the first days of pregnancy marks a critical signal in uterine cell remodeling and cell proliferation during the implantation of mice and hamster [33, 34]. As ihh inhibits important functions as a mediator of epithelial-mesenchymal interaction in the mouse uterus during early development, a possible influence of embryonal produced ihh—especially with regard to the significant increased number of ihh mRNA positive murine blastocysts in the Vitrolife medium group—on its receptor ptc which is localized in the uterine mesenchyme has to be contemplated [35].

Whereas the number of shh and ihh mRNA positive blastocysts differed only in the Vitrolife medium compared to the in vivo group, the number of blastocysts expressing il-6 mRNA showed a significant difference in both in vitro groups compared to the number of blastocysts of the in vivo group. Considering IL-6’s function in terms of regulating angiogenic processes during early embryo development and implantation, an altered mRNA expression of il-6 in the in vitro groups might lead to deviated angiogenic processes during early embryo development and implantation [5].

The four genes which are important with regard to ROS (nox, gpx1, gpx4, prdx2) were detected in both in vitro groups in a comparable fashion. Therefore, the supplementation of antioxidants seemed to have no beneficial effect at least on the mRNA expression of the representative genes investigated. Since Gonçalves et al. [23] described that addition of antioxidants to IVF media impairs early development of bovine embryos, implications of the murine embryo development due to the antioxidant enriched media have to be considered especially if an anticipated effect on ROS depending genes is not evident. The increased number of mRNA positive murine blastocysts in both in vitro collectives regarding gpx4, gpx1, and prdx2 might be explained with an adaptive mechanism of the embryo because of possible stress in the modified culture conditions compared with the physiological conditions in the female reproductive tract. Certainly it would have been interesting to investigate these expression patterns in a culture system with reduced oxygen concentration but could not do it due to technical reasons.

In summary, the present study shows that the in vitro culture alters the mRNA expression pattern of single murine embryos during early development. In spite of the constant effort to optimize the in vitro culture media, up to today there is still no perfect imitation of the physiological conditions within the female reproductive tract. Moreover, different in vitro culture media lead to a different gene expression profile in single murine blastocysts which might result in a disturbed early mouse development. Therefore, possible implications of the in vitro culture regarding modified pattern of mRNA expression should raise concern in terms of long-term clinical aspects and health condition of children born after ART and hence need to be addressed in further studies. In parallel more effort in order to optimize the in vitro culture media is needed.

Authors’ Contribution

N. Pfeifer and D. Baston-Büst has equally contributed to this work.

References

P. Rinaudo and R. M. Schultz, “Effects of embryo culture on global pattern of gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos,” Reproduction, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 301–311, 2004.

P. F. Rinaudo, G. Giritharan, S. Talbi, A. T. Dobson, and R. M. Schultz, “Effects of oxygen tension on gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 86, pp. 1252–1256, 2006.

M. Lane and D. K. Gardner, “Embryo culture medium: which is the best?” Best Practice and Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 83–100, 2007.

P. W. Ingham and A. P. McMahon, “Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles,” Genes and Development, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 3059–3087, 2001.

B. Motro, A. Itin, L. Sachs, and E. Keshet, “Pattern of interleukin 6 gene expression in vivo suggests a role for this cytokine in angiogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 8, pp. 3092–3096, 1990.

J. Fujii and Y. Ikeda, “Advances in our understanding of peroxiredoxin, a multifunctional, mammalian redox protein,” Redox Report, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 123–130, 2002.

K. Lee, J. S. Park, Y. J. Kim et al., “Differential expression of Prx I and II in mouse testis and their up-regulation by radiation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 296, no. 2, pp. 337–342, 2002.

J. S. Krüessel, H. Y. Huang, Y. Wen, A. R. Kloodt, P. Bielfeld, and M. L. Polan, “Different pattern of interleukin-1β-(IL-1β), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist- (IL-1ra) and interleukin-1 receptor type I-(IL-1R tI) mRNA-expression in single preimplantation mouse embryos at various developmental stages,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 103–120, 1997.

G. F. Cox, J. Bürger, V. Lip et al., “Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase, the risk of imprinting defects,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 162–164, 2002.

C. M. Owen and J. H. Segars, “Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 417–428, 2009.

S. Manipalviratn, A. DeCherney, and J. Segars, “Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 305–315, 2009.

C. Wrenzycki, D. Herrmann, L. Keskintepe et al., “Effects of culture system and protein supplementation on mRNA expression in pre-implantation bovine embryos,” Human Reproduction, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 893–901, 2001.

K. F. Lee, J. F. C. Chow, J. S. Xu, S. T. H. Chan, S. M. Ip, and W. S. B. Yeung, “A comparative study of gene expression in murine embryos developed in vivo, cultured in vitro, and cocultured with human oviductal cells using messenger ribonucleic acid differential display,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 910–917, 2001.

N. Minami, K. Sasaki, A. Aizawa, M. Miyamoto, and H. Imai, “Analysis of gene expression in mouse 2-cell embryos using fluorescein differential display: comparison of culture environments,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2001.

A. J. Harvey, K. L. Kind, and J. G. Thompson, “REDOX regulation of early embryo development,” Reproduction, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 479–486, 2002.

R. H. Wenger, “Mammalian oxygen sensing, signalling and gene regulation,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 203, no. 8, pp. 1253–1263, 2000.

Y. M. W. Janssen-Heininger, M. E. Poynter, and P. A. Baeuerle, “Recent advances towards understanding redox mechanisms in the activation of nuclear factor κB,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1317–1327, 2000.

Y. Umaoka, Y. Noda, K. Narimoto, and T. Mori, “Effects of oxygen toxicity on early development of mouse embryos,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 1992.

Y. Fujitani, K. Kasai, S. Ohtani, K. Nishimura, M. Yamada, and K. Utsumi, “Effect of oxygen concentration and free radicals on in vitro development of in vitro-produced bovine embryos,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 483–489, 1997.

J. C. M. Dumoulin, C. J. J. Meijers, M. Bras, E. Coonen, J. P. M. Geraedts, and J. L. H. Evers, “Effect of oxygen concentration on human in vitro fertilization and embryo culture,” Human Reproduction, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 465–469, 1999.

P. Guérin, S. El Mouatassim, and Y. Ménézo, “Oxidative stress and protection against reactive oxygen species in the pre-implantation embryo and its surroundings,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 175–189, 2001.

A. A. Ali, J. F. Bilodeau, and M. A. Sirard, “Antioxidant requirements for bovine oocytes varies during in vitro maturation, fertilization and development,” Theriogenology, vol. 59, no. 3-4, pp. 939–949, 2003.

F. S. Gonçalves, L. S. S. Barretto, R. P. Arruda, S. H. V. Perri, and G. Z. Mingoti, “Effect of antioxidants during bovine in vitro fertilization procedures on spermatozoa and embryo development,” Reproduction in Domestic Animals, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 129–135, 2010.

S. R. Payne, R. Munday, and J. G. Thompson, “Addition of superoxide dismutase and catalase does not necessarily overcome developmental retardation of one-cell mouse embryos during in-vitro culture,” Reproduction, fertility, and development, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 167–174, 1992.

A. Van Soom, Y. Q. Yuan, L. J. Peelman et al., “Prevalence of apoptosis and inner cell allocation in bovine embryos cultured under different oxygen tensions with or without cysteine addition,” Theriogenology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1453–1465, 2002.

H. Iwata, S. Akamatsu, N. Minami, and M. Yamada, “Effects of antioxidants on the development of bovine IVM/IVF embryos in various concentrations of glucose,” Theriogenology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 365–375, 1998.

N. T. Nguyen, D. P. C. Lin, C. Siriboon, N. W. Lo, and J. C. Ju, “Sonic Hedgehog improves in vitro development of porcine parthenotes and handmade cloned embryos,” Theriogenology, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 1149–1160, 2010.

S. Becker, Z. J. Wang, H. Massey et al., “A role for Indian hedgehog in extraembryonic endoderm differentiation in F9 cells and the early mouse embryo,” Developmental Biology, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 298–310, 1997.

M. A. Dyer, S. M. Farrington, D. Mohn, J. R. Munday, and M. H. Baron, “Indian hedgehog activates hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis and can respecify prospective neurectodermal cell fate in the mouse embryo,” Development, vol. 128, no. 10, pp. 1717–1730, 2001.

B. St-Jacques, M. Hammerschmidt, and A. P. McMahon, “Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation,” Genes and Development, vol. 13, no. 16, pp. 2072–2086, 1999.

B. Lanske, A. C. Karaplis, K. Lee et al., “PTH/PTHrP receptor in early development and Indian hedgehog-regulated bone growth,” Science, vol. 273, no. 5275, pp. 663–666, 1996.

A. Vortkamp, K. Lee, B. Lanske, G. V. Segre, H. M. Kronenberg, and C. J. Tabin, “Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian Hedgehog and PTH-related protein,” Science, vol. 273, no. 5275, pp. 613–622, 1996.

N. Takamoto, B. Zhao, S. Y. Tsai, and F. J. DeMayo, “Identification of Indian hedgehog as a progesterone-responsive gene in the murine uterus,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2338–2348, 2002.

A. Khatua, X. Wang, T. Ding et al., “Indian hedgehog, but not histidine decarboxylase or amphiregulin, is a progesterone-regulated uterine gene in hamsters,” Endocrinology, vol. 147, no. 9, pp. 4079–4092, 2006.

H. Matsumoto, X. Zhao, S. K. Das, B. L. M. Hogan, and S. K. Dey, “Indian hedgehog as a progesterone-responsive factor mediating epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the mouse uterus,” Developmental Biology, vol. 245, no. 2, pp. 280–290, 2002.