The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 426134, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/426134

Research Article

How Can Stress Be Controlled in Endodontically Treated Teeth? A 3D Finite Element Analysis

İhsan Yıkılgan and Oya Bala

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 06510 Emek, Ankara, Turkey

Received 30 May 2013; Accepted 29 June 2013

Academic Editors: C. H. Pameijer and N. Tanoue

Copyright © 2013 İhsan Yıkılgan and Oya Bala. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The aim of this study was to analyze the stresses that develop by oblique and vertical forces in endodontically treated maxillary second premolars that were restored with resin composite. Additionally, in our study the effects of the different restorative approaches and use of different base materials on stress formation were analyzed using three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. For restoration, the models representing both cusp capping, palatinal cusp capping, standard MOD restoration, and use of woven fiber in occlusal part were prepared. In all models, oblique forces caused more stress than did vertical forces. Materials with low elastic moduli cause high amounts of stress, whereas materials with elastic moduli similar to that of dental tissues cause low amounts of stress. Additional approaches such as cusp capping, functional cusp capping, and woven fiber use do not affect stress formation on the tooth after endodontic treatment.

1. Introduction

Many factors affect the success of endodontic treatment throughout its duration. Different approaches at various stages, such as the preparation technique, irrigation regimen, working length measurement, and obturation technique, have long-term functional effects on endodontically treated teeth. For clinical success, restoration after endodontic treatment is as important as the applications used during treatment. Many studies have suggested a direct connection between restoration quality and the success of endodontic treatment [1, 2].

Whereas healthy teeth may break because of traumatic factors [3], endodontically treated teeth are more fragile than vital teeth and can break because of typical functional factors. The main reason for such fracture is the loss of substance during caries elimination and the preparation of endodontic access cavities. Removing the marginal walls, especially in occlusal areas, during preparation negatively affects the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth [4]. Dehydration, collagen cruciate ligament loss, and dentin loss after endodontic treatment also negatively affect fracture resistance.

Teeth that show little substance loss after endodontic treatment can be restored conservatively. Sound dentinal tissue with 1.5 mm thickness and 3-4 mm buccal and lingual heights is required to restore teeth conservatively [5]. Various materials, such as amalgam, composite resins, metal alloys, and dental ceramics, are used for conservative tooth restoration. Among these materials, composite resins are usually preferred for the direct restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment.

Various approaches are currently used to reduce or eliminate stress formation on dental tissues while restoring teeth that have been endodontically treated with composite resin. One approach is the use of base materials, such as resin-modified glass ionomer or fluid composite resin, under composite restorations. The use of base materials reportedly absorbs stress and thus can be beneficial although it remains controversial [6–8].

Composite restoration can be performed using different approaches to increase the fracture resistance of other dental tissues after endodontic treatment and to prevent the formation of undesired stress. One approach is cusp capping with composite resin, which is performed by slightly reducing cusp height and then covering the reduced cusps with composite resin. This procedure can be applied to functional or multiple cusps. Cusp capping reportedly decreases stress formation while increasing the fracture resistance of teeth after endodontic treatment [9–12].

Another restorative approach is the placement of woven fiber in the composite restoration to increase its mechanical strength [13, 14]. In studies evaluating the effect of woven fiber use on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, the fiber has been placed in the restoration or used to splint cusps [4, 13–18]. Although some studies have shown that the use of woven fiber increases the fracture resistance of teeth [13, 14, 19], others have found no significant effect [15–17].

In the previously studies, the effects of the use of base material and woven fiber on the stress formation in endodontically treated teeth have not been analyzed. The effect of cusp capping on the stress formation in endodontically treated teeth has been analyzed in a limited number of studies, but different types of cusp capping have not been compared. In addition, there is not a comprehensive study which can guide clinicians in the conservative restoration of endodontically treated teeth.

The aim of this study was to analyze (1) the different composite restoration types (cupping one cusp, cupping two cusps, using woven fiber) in endodontically treated maxillary second premolars, (2) the use of different base materials (fluid composite, resin-modified glass ionomer) under composite restorations, and (3) the effects of occlusal forces applied from different directions on stress in other dental tissues with a three-dimensional (3D) finite element stress analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Master Model Preparation

A single-rooted, single-canal, endodontically treated maxillary second premolar with mesial and distal caries was evaluated in this study. First, images of the tooth were taken from different perspectives and in different dimensions using Wheeler’s atlas. The images of the premolar were then scaled to create a model according to these dimensions using Rhinoceros software (ver. 4.0; McNeil Inc., NJ, USA) (Figure 1(a)). Mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) and endodontic access cavities were prepared on the tooth models, and root canal fillings were positioned (Figures 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), 1(d), and 1(e)). ProTaper F3 gutta percha (Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland), which is designed for use with the F3 file of the ProTaper rotary instrument for root canal filling, was adapted to the root canal system by modeling to 1 mm short of the apex. Lamina dura (0.25 mm), periodontal ligament (0.25 mm), and cortical and cancellous bone (≥1.5 mm) were modeled around the tooth root and matched with the tooth using the same software (Figures 1(g), 1(h), 1(i), and 1(j)). Next, the master model of the endodontically treated tooth was made so that access was closed with 1 mm resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Changes were then made to mathematically analyze the distribution of any stress occurring with the use of different restorative approaches on this master pattern (Figure 1(k)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

Figure 1: Model preparation, (a) sound tooth model, (b) MOD and endodontic access cavity, (c, d) root-canal filling and resin modified glass ionomer, (e) adaptation of root-canal filling to model, (f) restoration, (g) modeling of PDL, (h, i, j) lamina dura, cortical, and cancellous bone, and (k) model of the endodontically treated tooth.

2.2. Restorative Approaches

Models were made assuming the use of resin-modified ionomer cement and fluid composite resin as base materials. Four different approaches to maxillary tooth restoration were evaluated: capping two cusps, cupping the palatinal cusp, and using woven fiber on the occlusal area and standard MOD restoration.

Models that underwent capping of two cusps were prepared by simulating 2 mm vertical reductions of the buccal and palatinal cusps parallel to the long axis of the tooth on the master model. The obtained spaces were then filled with composite resin (Figure 2(a)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2: Restorative approaches (a) buccal + palatinal cusps capped, (b) palatinal cusps capped, (c) MOD restoration, and (d) woven fiber used.

Similarly, in models in which only the palatinal cusp was covered, the palatinal cusp was formed of composite resin and the buccal cusp of dental tissue (Figure 2(b)).

No additional restoration was performed with composite resin on models that underwent MOD restoration (Figure 2(c)).

For restorations in which woven fiber was used, a 3 mm wide and 2 mm deep space was modeled in the bucco-palatinal direction over the buccal and palatinal cusps on the master model. Woven fiber was then placed in the space so that it was consistent with the occlusal gradient of the tooth. Finally, the upper portion of the woven fiber was covered with composite resin (Figure 2(d)).

As a result, 12 models of 12 different restorative approaches were obtained.

Tooth models prepared with Rhinoceros 4.0 software were transferred to Algor Fempro software (ALGOR, Inc. 150 Beta Drive Pittsburgh, PA, USA) in STL format and meshed for analysis. For meshing, the models comprised 10-knot point (brick-type) units when possible. To obtain realistic results, we selected an excessive number of units for all dimensions of the tooth models within the bounds of the program. A total of 167,606 units and 30,172 knots were used in mathematical models that included scripts.

Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio, which describe the physical characteristics of each structure, were loaded into the software to identify the materials from which existing structures on the models prepared with Algor Fempro software were made (Table 1) [20, 21]. Solid features were accepted as linearly resilient, homogenous, and isotropic in the program.

Table 1: Material properties (Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio).

Material
Young's modulus (GPa)
Poisson's ratio
Reference

Enamel
41
0.31
[21]

Dentin
18,6
0.31
[21]

Cortical bone
13,7
0.30
[21]

Cancellous bone
1,37
0.30
[21]

Periodontal ligament
0.0000689
0.45
[21]

Composite resin
12
0.30
[21]

Woven fiber

    Longitudinal (X)
46
0.39
[22]

    Transverse (Y)
7
0.29
[22]

    Transverse (Z)
7
0.29
[22]

Fluid composite resin
5,1
0.27
[21]

RMGI
10,6
0.30
[21]

Guta perka
0.14
0.45
[21]

2.3. Determination of Contact Surfaces on the Models

All components were assumed to be in contact with one another for the identification of surface relationships among the model’s parts and analysis of the mathematical models.

2.4. Border Conditions

Zero motion and rotation were identified at six degrees of freedom from the side and upper surfaces of dental tissues.

2.5. Loading and Stress Analyses

Two different scripts were evaluated in the study. In the first script, a 100 N force was applied to the central fossae of restored tooth models parallel to the long axis of the tooth (vertical). In the second script, a 100 N force was applied to the palatinal cusps of the tooth models at a 45° angle to the long axis of the tooth (oblique).

Stresses arising from the restorative approach and script differences were evaluated with 3D finite element stress analysis, and Von Mises stress rates were recorded.

3. Results

Maximum stress values in models to which vertical and oblique forces were applied are shown in Table 2. In all models, enamel in the cervical area and at the cementoenamel junction showed the highest stress values after force application.

Table 2: Maximum stress values in models to which vertical and oblique forces were applied.

Restoration type
Base
Vertical force
Oblique force

Max.
Enamel
Dentin
Max.
Enamel
Dentin

Model 1
Buccal + palatinal cusps capping
RMGI
23,2576
23,2576
7,47318
48,1163
48,1163
16,8935

Model 2
Palatinal cusp capping
RMGI
23,2593
23,2593
7,46765
52,6151
52,6151
18,3603

Model 3
MOD restoration
RMGI
23,2844
23,2844
7,48487
52,6108
52,6108
18,3592

Model 4
Woven fiber
RMGI
24,279
24,279
7,41309
52,7324
52,7324
18,3862

Model 5
Buccal + palatinal cusps capping
Fluid composite
25,019
25,019
7,99823
49,32
49,32
17,2984

Model 6
Palatinal cusp capping
Fluid composite
25,0536
25,0536
7,99245
49,3576
49,3576
17,3073

Model 7
MOD restoration
Fluid composite
25,078
25,078
8,01069
53,8333
53,8333
18,7693

Model 8
Woven fiber
Fluid composite
26,1037
26,1037
7,94491
53,9383
53,9383
18,7906

Model 9
Buccal + palatinal cusps capping
No base
22,0818
22,0818
7,15808
51,6907
51,6907
18,0553

Model 10
Palatinal cusp capping
No base
22,083
22,083
7,15272
48,4006
48,4006
16,6957

Model 11
MOD restoration
No base
22,1082
22,1082
7,16925
51,7573
51,7573
18,0709

Model 12
Woven fiber
No base
23,2833
23,0794
7,09289
44,0467
44,0467
15,1938

When the models were evaluated according to restoration type, differences were observed between models to which vertical forces were applied and those to which oblique forces were applied. The highest stress values were observed in models in which woven fiber was used, compared with those to which vertical forces were applied. Whereas the stress values for other models were similar, those in which two cusps were covered yielded the lowest stress value. Specimens in which woven fiber was used showed lower stress values than did those to which oblique forces were applied. Whereas the stress values for other specimens were similar, those undergoing MOD restoration yielded the highest stress values.

Lower stress values were obtained in models with no base material than in those in which base material was used. Among models with base materials, lower stress values were obtained for resin-modified glass ionomer cement than for fluid composite.

Higher stress values were obtained in models to which oblique forces were applied than in those to which vertical forces were applied (Figure 3).

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: Principal stress distribution of Model 1 (buccal + palatinal cusps capped): (a) vertikal force applied ((a-1) enamel and dentin, (a-2) dentin) and (b) oblique force applied ((b-1) enamel and dentin, (b-2) dentin).

4. Discussion

The effects of masticator forces on endodontically treated teeth have been evaluated by stress analysis and fracture resistance studies. Fracture resistance tests are important because they determine the maximum strength that teeth resist while functioning and enable the evaluation of tooth reaction to instant force application. However, such tests cannot evaluate fatigue in other dental tissues according to masticator forces. Thus, stress analysis methods are currently considered to be superior to fracture resistance tests because they provide comparative information about dental tissues, restoration fatigue, and deformation over time with the use of different restorative techniques.

Teeth are exposed to many forces from different parts of the mouth. Because the evaluation of all such forces was difficult on the 12 models prepared in our study, vertical and oblique forces, which are accepted as the basis of masticatory function, were evaluated. We found that oblique forces caused more stress than vertical forces in dental tissues because vertical forces applied to the teeth are transmitted to the root and, thereby, to periodontal tissues, causing less stress in the coronal tooth structures. However, oblique forces cause more stress in coronal than in periodontal tissues, resulting in more fatigue and injurious effects in coronal dental tissues. The results of previous studies support these findings [22, 23].

For both vertical and oblique force applications in our study, stress values were lower in specimens with no base models than in those in which the same restorative approaches were applied. The highest stress values were observed in models in which fluid composite resin was used as a base material, which may reflect differences in the elastic modulus of the materials. Our results are supported by studies showing that materials with elastic moduli similar to that of dental tissues transmit functional forces with less stress, whereas materials with low elastic moduli cause severe stress [5, 24]. Shubhashini et al. [24] evaluated the effects of composite resin, fluid composite resin, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and glass ionomer cement on stress distribution in class V restorations using finite element stress analysis. They reported that the least stress was observed with composite resin, which has an elastic modulus similar to that of dental tissues. The authors concluded that materials with such elastic moduli may cause less stress.

The restoration types play an important role in the clinical prognosis of endodontically treated teeth. Fracture resistance of teeth is known to decrease after endodontic treatment, and the amount of stress in dental tissues increases in the face of functional forces. Many studies have revealed the ideal restorative approaches that increase fracture resistance of remaining dental tissues after endodontic treatment and enable minimal stress transmission [10, 18, 19, 25–27]. The use of woven fiber, fiber posts, and cusp capping was generally preferred in these studies to strengthen tooth structure. In our study, the effects of woven fiber and cusp capping on stress creation were evaluated.

Most studies evaluating the effect of cusp capping on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth has MOD cavities in the maxillary premolars. These studies have produced inconsistent results; some have suggested that cusp capping increases fracture resistance [11, 12, 25, 28], whereas others have found no significant effect [9, 27, 29].

In our study, cusp capping techniques (one or two cusp capping) were not superior to other restoration techniques in terms of stress creation, and they even caused more stress in some specimens subjected to vertical and oblique force applications. In contrast to our results, Jiang et al. [10] reported that cusp capping created more tolerable stress in other dental tissues when teeth were treated endodontically. This difference may be because our study and that of Jiang et al. used different models for finite element analysis. In our study, cortical and cancellous bone and the periodontal ligament were modeled separately. Absence of the periodontal ligament in Jiang et al.’s model may have markedly affected the amount and dispersion of stress.

The use of woven fiber in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth is a new approach. Woven fiber is placed in the restoration or used for cusp splinting. Some studies have evaluated the effect of woven fiber on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth [13, 15, 19, 30]. However, its effect on stress creation has not been evaluated.

Belli et al. [14] reported that fracture resistance values were higher in specimens in which woven fiber was placed in the occlusal parts of the restoration, and that fracture resistance of specimens in which woven fiber was placed at the base of the cavity was superior to that of specimens restored with only composite resin (no woven fiber). Sengun et al. [15] evaluated the effect of buccal and lingual cusp splinting with woven fiber on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. The use of woven fiber did not increase fracture resistance, but caused the creation of fractures that could be restored. Lia Mondelli et al. [12] showed that the fracture strength of specimens in which cusps were splinted with woven fiber was significantly superior to those in which woven fiber was placed at the cavity base or center of the restoration. In our study, cusps were splinted to each other by placing woven fiber in the space opened in palatinal and buccal cusps. However, the effect of the difference in woven fiber position on stress creation was not evaluated.

Among models with woven fiber, higher stress values were observed in those to which vertical force was applied than in those to which oblique force was applied. These results suggest that the use of woven fiber may be an effective option enabling the toleration of oblique forces, which cause more stress.

5. Conclusions

(1)In all models, oblique forces caused more stress than did vertical forces.(2)Materials with low elastic moduli cause high amounts of stress, whereas materials with elastic moduli similar to that of dental tissues cause low amounts of stress. Thus, the use of materials with elastic moduli similar tissues to that of dental for restoration after endodontic treatment creates less stress in other dental tissues.(3)Additional restoration types such as cusp capping, functional cusp capping, and woven fiber use do not affect stress formation on the tooth after endodontic treatment.(4)The results of our study do not reflect the clinical situation because they were obtained using computed-generated mathematical models. Our findings with regard to the use of different restorative approaches in endodontically treated maxillary second premolars should be supported with clinical follow-up studies and further research.

References

L. Tronstad, K. Asbjørnsen, L. Døving, I. Pedersen, and H. M. Eriksen, “Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 218–221, 2000.

L.-L. Kirkevang, D. Ørstavik, P. Hörsted-Bindslev, and A. Wenzel, “Periapical status and quality of root fillings and coronal restorations in a Danish population,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 509–515, 2000.

J. Andreasen and F. M. Andreasen, Textbook and Color Atlas of Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth Munksgaard Copenhagen, 2007.

S. Belli, F. K. Cobankara, O. Eraslan, G. Eskitascioglu, and V. Karbhari, “The effect of fiber insertion on fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars with MOD cavity and reattached fractured lingual cusps,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2006.

H. O. Heymann, E. J. Swift Jr., and V. Andre Ritter, Sturdevant's Art & Science of Operative Dentistry, Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 5th edition, 2010.

M. Sadeghi and C. D. Lynch, “The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 306–311, 2009.

C. Sabatini, U. Blunck, G. Denehy, and C. Munoz, “Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 663–671, 2010.

P. E. G. D. A. Campos, M. D. O. Barceleiro, H. R. Sampaio-Filho, and L. R. M. Martins, “Evaluation of the cervical integrity during occlusal loading of class II restorations,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2008.

C. J. Soares, P. V. Soares, P. C. de Freitas Santos-Filho, C. G. Castro, D. Magalhaes, and A. Versluis, “The influence of cavity design and glass fiber posts on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1015–1019, 2008.

W. Jiang, H. Bo, G. YongChun, and N. LongXing, “Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2010.

N. Scotti, M. Scansetti, R. Rota, F. Pera, D. Pasqualini, and E. Berutti, “The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 923–929, 2011.

R. F. Lia Mondelli, S. K. Ishikiriama, O. De Oliveira Filho, and J. Mondelli, “Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage,” Journal of Applied Oral Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 161–165, 2009.

P. A. Oskoee, A. A. Ajami, E. J. Navimipour, S. S. Oskoee, and J. Sadjadi, “The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 413–416, 2009.

S. Belli, A. Erdemir, M. Ozcopur, and G. Eskitascioglu, “The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2005.

A. Sengun, F. K. Cobankara, and H. Orucoglu, “Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 214–219, 2008.

F. K. Cobankara, N. Unlu, A. R. Cetin, and H. B. Ozkan, “The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 526–533, 2008.

F. B. Rodrigues, M. P. G. Paranhos, A. M. Spohr, H. M. S. Oshima, B. Carlini, and L. H. Burnett Jr., “Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 356–362, 2010.

S. Akman, M. Akman, G. Eskitascioglu, and S. Belli, “Influence of several fibre-reinforced composite restoration techniques on cusp movement and fracture strength of molar teeth,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 407–415, 2011.

S. Belli, A. Erdemir, and C. Yildirim, “Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 136–142, 2006.

A. Shinya, D. Yokoyama, L. V. J. Lassila, A. Shinya, and P. K. Vallittu, “Three-dimensional finite element analysis of metal and FRC adhesive fixed dental prostheses,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 365–371, 2008.

Ö. Eraslan, O. Eraslan, G. Eskitaşcioǧlu, and S. Belli, “Conservative restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolar teeth: a FEM study,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 403–408, 2011.

P. J. J. M. Plasmans, L. G. H. Visseren, M. M. A. Vrijhoef, and A. F. Käyser, “In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 382–387, 1986.

G. W. Christian, G. L. Button, P. C. Moon, M. C. England, and H. B. Douglas, “Post core restoration in endodontically treated posterior teeth,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 182–185, 1981.

N. Shubhashini, N. Meena, A. Shetty, A. Kumari, and D. N. Naveen, “Finite element analysis of stress concentration in Class V restorations of four groups of restorative materials in mandibular premolar,” Journal of Conservative Dentistry, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 121–126, 2008.

A. Elayouti, M. I. Serry, J. Geis-Gerstorfer, and C. Löst, “Influence of cusp coverage on the fracture resistance of premolars with endodontic access cavities,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 543–549, 2011.

M. Hammad, A. Qualtrough, and N. Silikas, “Effect of new obturating materials on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 732–736, 2007.

N. Mohammadi, M. A. Kahnamoii, P. K. Yeganeh, and E. J. Navimipour, “Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1428–1432, 2009.

K. Bitter, H. Meyer-Lueckel, N. Fotiadis et al., “Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 469–477, 2010.

R. B. Fonseca, A. J. Fernandes-Neto, L. Correr-Sobrinho, and C. J. Soares, “The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 277–284, 2007.

S. Belli, H. Orucoglu, C. Yildirim, and G. Eskitascioglu, “The effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in class II adhesive restorations,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 175–181, 2007.