The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 391282, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/391282

Research Article

Improved Stability Criteria of Static Recurrent Neural Networks with a Time-Varying Delay

Lei Ding,¹ Hong-Bing Zeng,² Wei Wang,³ and Fei Yu⁴

¹School of Information Science and Engineering, Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China

²School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China

³Hunan Railway Professional Technology College, Zhuzhou 412001, China

⁴Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for Computer Information Processing Technology, Soochow University, Soochow 215006, China

Received 17 August 2013; Accepted 8 January 2014; Published 24 February 2014

Academic Editors: J. Shu and Z. Chen

Copyright © 2014 Lei Ding et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

This paper investigates the stability of static recurrent neural networks (SRNNs) with a time-varying delay. Based on the complete delay-decomposing approach and quadratic separation framework, a novel Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional is constructed. By employing a reciprocally convex technique to consider the relationship between the time-varying delay and its varying interval, some improved delay-dependent stability conditions are presented in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). Finally, a numerical example is provided to show the merits and the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

1. Introduction

During the past decades, recurrent neural network (RNN) has been successfully applied in many fields, such as signal processing, pattern classification, associative memory design, and optimization. Therefore, the study of RNN has attracted considerable attention and various issues of neural networks have been investigated (see, e.g., [1–4] and the references therein). As the integration and communication delay is unavoidably encountered in implementation of RNN and is often the main source of instability and oscillations, much efforts have been expended on the problem of stability of RNNs with time delays (see, e.g., [5–14]).

RNNs can be classified as local field networks and static neural networks based on the difference of basic variables (local field states or neuron states) [15]. Recently, the stability of static recurrent neural networks (SRNNs) with time-varying delay was investigated in [16], where sufficient conditions were obtained guaranteeing the global asymptotic stability of the neural network. Nevertheless, some negative semi-definite terms were ignored in [16], which lead to the conservatism of the derived result. By retaining these terms and considering the low bound of the delay, some improved stability conditions were derived for SRNNs with interval time-varying delay in [17]. In [18], an input-output framework was proposed to investigate the stability of SRNNs with linear fractional uncertainties and delays. Based on the augmented Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional approach, some new conditions were derived to assure the stability of SRNNs in [19–22], but the results can be further improved.

In this paper, the problem of stability of SRNNs with time-varying delay is investigated based on the complete delay-decomposing approach [12]. By employing a reciprocally convex technique, some sufficient conditions are derived in the forms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). The effectiveness and the merit are illustrated by a numerical example.

Notations. Through this paper, and stand for the transpose and the inverse of the matrix , respectively;    means that the matrix is symmetric and positive definite (semipositive definite); denotes the -dimensional Euclidean space; denotes a block-diagonal matrix; is the Euclidean norm of ; the symbol within a matrix represents the symmetric terms of the matrix; for example, . Matrices, if not explicitly stated, are assumed to have compatible dimensions.

2. System Description

Consider the following delayed neural network:

where and denote the neuron state vector and the input vector, respectively; is the neuron activation function; is the initial condition; and are known interconnection weight matrices; and is the time-varying delay and satisfies

Furthermore, the neuron activation functions satisfy the following assumption.

Assumption 1. The neuron activation functions are bounded and satisfy

where for . For simplicity, denote .

Under Assumption 1, there exists an equilibrium of (1). Hence, by the transformation , (1) can be transformed into

where is the state vector; is the initial condition; and the transformed neuron activation functions − satisfies

Notice that there exists an equilibrium point in neural network (5), corresponding to the initial condition . Based on the analysis above, the problem of analyzing the stability of system (1) at equilibrium is changed into a problem of analyzing the zero stability of system (5).

Before presenting our main results, we first introduce two lemmas, which are useful in the stability analysis of the considered neural network.

Lemma 2 (see [23]). Let be a constant real matrix, and suppose with such that the subsequent integration is well defined. Then, one has

where .

Lemma 3 (see [24]). Let be given finite functions, and they have positive values for arbitrary value of independent variable in an open subset of . The reciprocally convex combination of    in satisfies

subject to

3. Main Results

In the sequel, following the method proposed in [13], we decompose the delay interval into equidistant subintervals, where is a given integer; that is, with . Thus, for any , there should exist an integer , such that . Then the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional candidate is chosen as

with

where

are to be determined, ,  , and   denotes the th row of matrix .

Remark 4. Notice that a novel term being continuous at is included in the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional (10), which plays an important role in reducing conservativeness of the derived result.

Next, we develop some new delay-dependent stability criteria for the delayed neural networks described by (5) and (6) with satisfying (2) and (3). By employing the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional (10), the following theorem is obtained.

Theorem 5. For a given positive integer , scalars and , the origin of system (5) with the activation function satisfying (6) and a time-varying delay satisfying conditions (3) is globally asymptotically stable if there exist

and , , , and , , with appropriate dimensions, such that, for ,

where

with

Proof. From Assumption 1, it can be deduced that, for any diagonal matrices ,  ,

Now, calculating the derivative of along the solutions of neural network (5) yields

where

By Lemmas 2 and 3, it can be deduced that

where .

Next, we introduce a new vector as

where

Then, rewrite system (5) as

Adding the right sides of (18) to (19) and applying (21) yield

where

For all , if , which is equivalent to LMIs (14) in the sense of Schur complement [25], then for any . Note that is continuous at , so the system (5) is globally asymptotically stable. This completes the proof.

Remark 6. In the proof of Theorem 5, and are not simply enlarged to as [16] does. By employing reciprocally convex approach to consider this information, Theorem 5 may be less conservative, which will be verified by the simulation results in the next section.

Remark 7. In previous works such as [16, 19], considerable attention has been paid to the case that the derivative of the time-varying delay satisfies (3). However, in the case of satifying

the treatment in [16, 19] means that in (27) is enlarged to , which may lead to conservativeness inevitably. By contrast, the case above can be taken fully into account by replacing with in Theorem 5.

For the case that the time-varying delay is nondifferentiable or is unknown, setting ,  , in Theorem 5, a delay-dependent and rate-independent criterion is easily derived as follows.

Corollary 8. For a given positive integer , scalars , the origin of system (5) with the activation function satisfying (6) and a time-varying delay satisfying condition (2) is globally asymptotically stable if there exist

with appropriate dimensions, such that, for , LMIs in (15) and (29) hold

where , and are defined in Theorem 5.

4. Numerical Examples

In this section, we will provide a numerical example to show the effectiveness of the presented criteria.

Example 1. Consider neural network (1) with the following parameters:

The activation functions satisfy (6) with

This example has been discussed in [16–22]. By using Theorem 5 and Corollary 8 with , for various , the upper bounds that guarantee the global asymptotic stability of neural network (1) are computed and listed in Table 1. It can be concluded that the upper bounds obtained by our method are much better than those in [16–22]. Obviously, the conditions proposed in this paper are an improvement over the existing ones.

Table 1: Allowable upper bounds of for different .

0
0.1
0.5
0.9
Any

[16]
1.3323
0.8245
0.3733
0.2343
0.2313

[19]
1.3325
0.8404
0.4265
0.3217
0.3211

[20]
1.3324
0.8402
0.4266
0.3225
0.3218

[17]
1.3323
0.8402
0.4264
0.3214
0.3209

[18]
1.5157
0.9279
0.4267
—
0.3212

[18]
1.5330
0.9331
0.4268
—
0.3215

[21]
—
0.8411
0.4267
0.3227
0.3215

[22]
1.5575
0.9430
0.4417
0.3632
0.3632

The proposed ()
1.7685
1.0431
0.4382
0.3668
0.3644

5. Conclusions

This paper has studied the stability of SRNNs by constructing a complete delay-decomposing Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional. Some improved delay-dependent stability conditions have been derived by utilizing a reciprocally convex technique to consider the relationship between the time-varying delay and its varying interval, which are formulated in linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). Finally, a numerical example has been provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 61304064, 61363073, 61273157, and 61262032), the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 13JJ6058), the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province (no. 13A075), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan University of Technology (no. 2012HZX06).

References

A. N. Michel and D. Liu, Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis of Recurrent Neural Networks, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2002.

Q. J. Zhang and X. Q. Lu, “A recurrent neural network for nonlinear fractional programming,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 807656, 18 pages, 2012.

K. Goto and K. Shibata, “Emergence of prediction by reinforcement learning using a recurrent neural network,” Journal of Robotics, vol. 2010, Article ID 437654, 9 pages, 2010.

C.-C. Ku and K. Y. Lee, “Diagonal recurrent neural networks for dynamic systems control,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 144–156, 1995.

Y. Liu, Z. Wang, and X. Liu, “Global exponential stability of generalized recurrent neural networks with discrete and distributed delays,” Neural Networks, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 667–675, 2006.

T. Li, W. X. Zheng, and C. Lin, “Delay-slope-dependent stability results of recurrent neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2138–2143, 2011.

T. Li, Q. Luo, C. Sun, and B. Zhang, “Exponential stability of recurrent neural networks with time-varying discrete and distributed delays,” Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2581–2589, 2009.

J. Cao and J. Wang, “Global asymptotic and robust stability of recurrent neural networks with time delays,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 417–426, 2005.

C. Li and X. Liao, “Robust stability and robust periodicity of delayed recurrent neural networks with noise disturbance,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 2265–2273, 2006.

Y. Liu, Z. Wang, A. Serrano, and X. Liu, “Discrete-time recurrent neural networks with time-varying delays: exponential stability analysis,” Physics Letters A, vol. 362, no. 5-6, pp. 480–488, 2007.

Y. He, G. P. Liu, D. Rees, and M. Wu, “Stability analysis for neural networks with time-varying interval delay,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1850–1854, 2007.

H.-B. Zeng, Y. He, M. Wu, and C.-F. Zhang, “Complete delay-decomposing approach to asymptotic stability for neural networks with time-varying delays,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 806–812, 2011.

X.-M. Zhang and Q.-L. Han, “New Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals for global asymptotic stability of delayed neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 533–539, 2009.

S.-P. Xiao and X.-M. Zhang, “New globally asymptotic stability criteria for delayed cellular neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 659–663, 2009.

Z.-B. Xu, H. Qiao, J. Peng, and B. Zhang, “A comparative study of two modeling approaches in neural networks,” Neural Networks, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 73–85, 2004.

H. Shao, “Delay-dependent stability for recurrent neural networks with time-varying delays,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1647–1651, 2008.

Z. Zuo, C. Yang, and Y. Wang, “A new method for stability analysis of recurrent neural networks with interval time-varying delay,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 339–344, 2010.

X. Li, H. Gao, and X. Yu, “A unified approach to the stability of generalized static neural networks with linear fractional uncertainties and delays,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1275–1286, 2011.

Y.-Y. Wu and Y.-Q. Wu, “Stability analysis for recurrent neural networks with time-varying delay,” International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 223–227, 2009.

H.-B. Zeng, S.-P. Xiao, and B. Liu, “New stability criteria for recurrent neural networks with a time-varying delay,” International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 128–133, 2011.

Y. Q. Bai and J. Chen, “New stability criteria for recurrent neural networks with interval time-varying delay,” Neurocomputing, vol. 121, pp. 179–184, 2013.

M. D. Ji, Y. He, C. K. Zhang, and M. Wu, “Novel stability criteria for recurrent neural network with time-varying delay,” Neurocomputing, 2014.

Q.-L. Han, “A new delay-dependent stability criterion for linear neutral systems with norm-bounded uncertainties in all system matrices,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 469–475, 2005.

P. Park, J. W. Ko, and C. Jeong, “Reciprocally convex approach to stability of systems with time-varying delays,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 235–238, 2011.

S. Boyd, L. E. Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1994.