The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 543813, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/543813

Research Article

Brachiaria ruziziensis Responses to Different Fertilization Doses and to the Attack of Mahanarva spectabilis (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) Nymphs and Adults

Daniela de Melo Aguiar, Alexander Machado Auad, Marcy das Graças Fonseca, and Melissa Vieira Leite

Embrapa Dairy Cattle Research Center, Rua Eugênio do Nascimento, 610 Dom Bosco, 36038-330, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil

Received 12 August 2013; Accepted 27 October 2013; Published 22 January 2014

Academic Editors: E. T. Johnson and P. Parolin

Copyright © 2014 Daniela de Melo Aguiar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Cropping practices are necessary in order to help reduce the population of pest insect, such as the induction of resistance through fertilization. Therefore, this study aimed to assess alterations on the production and quality of Brachiaria ruziziensis when receiving the fertilization composed by the macronutrients NPK and/or exposed to the attack of Mahanarva spectabilis nymphs and adults. B. ruziziensis plants were fertilized according to the recommendation (R), half of the recommended fertilization (H), or non-fertilization (C). They were also exposed to different M. spectabilis nymph and adult densities. The damage, regrowth, and bromatological components were evaluated. The fertilization treatment promoted a higher M. spectabilis nymph survival on B. ruziziensis; however, it reduced the damage caused by the forage exposed to nymphs and adults of pest insect, and it did not alter the quality of the signal grass. Moreover, the fertilization treatment enabled forage recovery, even when exposed to 5 nymphs or 10 spittlebug adults.

1. Introduction

The livestock is one of the most important Brazilian economic activities, and its contribution for the gross domestic product (GDP), in the second semester of 2011, achieved 61.9 billion reais [1]. Among the forages used in Brazil, it is possible to point out Brachiaria ruziziensis, because it contains a high quality for the cattle. Nevertheless, productivity levels in most Brazilian pastures are considered low, due to their degradation level [2].

Besides, forage productivity is also compromised by the spittlebugs attack [3]. This fact is worrying, because more than 90% of cattle for meat production use forages for feeding [4], as they represent one of the most economic food resource [5]. It is not known if cercopids affect the chemical-bromatological composition of forages. This is represented by crude protein content, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and values of in vitro dry matter digestibility that are important on the quantitative analysis of the forage, as long as these variables might assume direct or indirect influence on the consumption of dry material and, consequently, on the animal production [6].

Among the species that occur in Brazil, Mahanarva spectabilis (Distant, 1909) is considered a limiting pest upon the forage grass production [7, 8]. These insects, nymphs and adults, cause harm to the host plant [9] by sucking its sap and injecting a toxin, that initiates yellowing and drought of the forage [10]. This makes it unpalatable for the cattle [11]. The damage caused by the spittlebugs is around 840 to 2100 billion dollars per year throughout the world [12], justifying the necessity of discovering efficient control methods for minimizing these losses.

There are controlling techniques, and the one which has the most succeeded is the diversification of pastures by using resistant grass [13–15]. The control by forage resistance has low cost and may be easily adopted by the agricultures; however, getting resistant materials demands a long wait. The adoption of chemical control is not recommended, because it is economic and ecologically unfavorable [16]. Therefore, it is strongly necessary to develop good cropping practices in order to help reduce the population of this pest insect, also aiming to answer the producers demand, such as the induction of resistance through fertilization.

Morphological responses from plants to fertilizers are evident, such as changes on growing rates, acceleration or delay of maturity, size of parts of the plants, and the thickness and hardness of epicuticle, which influence the success of many pest species when attacking the host [17]. Moreover, any factor that affects the plant physiology may lead to changes on the resistance to pest insects [17].

Thus, it was aimed to verify changes on B. ruziziensis production and quality, when fertilized with macronutrients NPK and/or exposed to M. spectabilis nymph and adults attack through evaluation of damage score, regrowth, and bromatological components.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Brachiaria ruziziensis Plants and Pest Insect Maintenance

Seeds of a commercial variety of B. ruziziensis were planted in trays containing vermiculite and after 20 days were transferred to plastic tubes (35 cm³) containing plant substrate. After 35 days, two seedlings were moved into vases with 1 Kg capacity of soil collected from the field with clay texture (59% of clay, 5% of silt, and 36% of sand). In order to correct the soil's acidity, dolomitic calcarium (PRNT 90%) was applied. The plants were kept in a greenhouse (average temperature 27.5 ± 4°C).

M. spectabilis nymphs and adults were collected in Embrapa Dairy Cattle Research Center, Brazil, and kept in the entomological laboratory and greenhouse. Recently emerged adults were transferred to acrylic cages (30 30 60 cm). The cages contained a section with gauze moistened with distilled water, which served as an oviposition substrate. To remove the eggs deposited on the substrate, the gauze was placed on a set of sieves and subjected to water jets, such that the eggs remained on the thinnest sieve (400 m mesh size). The eggs were placed in petri dishes (2 cm high × 5 cm in diameter) lined with moistened filter paper and kept in a climatic chamber at 25 ± 2°C, with 70 ± 10% relative humidity (RH) and a 14 h photophase. The filter paper was moistened daily, and embryonic development was observed up to stage 4 (S4), close to hatching, which was used on the experiments. This developmental stage of the egg is characterized by 2 red spots on each side of the operculum, corresponding to the eyes, with the red spot representing the nymphs’ abdominal pigments [18].

2.2. Plant Fertilization Effect on the M. spectabilis Nymph Survival

Plants roots were exposed and filter paper sections (1 2 cm), with sixteen eggs (S4) of M. spectabilis, was placed in each vase.

After the soil analysis, the plants were fertilized according to the literature recommendation (R) [19]. This fertilization was done applying 45 mg/dm³ of urea, 255 mg/dm³ of superphosphate, and 28 mg/dm³ of potassium chlorate on the planting and 140 mg/dm³ of NPK 20-5-20 on the 30th and the 60th days. The same number of plants received half of the recommended fertilization (H). The control group (C) received no fertilization.

The vase and the signal grass base were kept in fabric bags (voil), tied to the plant base, to prevent the insects from escaping. After 32 days, the nymph survival percentage was recorded on the plants submitted to fertilization doses R, H, and C. The assays were conducted in a randomized block, with three treatments containing 40 repetitions each, totalizing 120 experimental units. Data were submitted to variance analysis and the averages were compared by the Tukey test (), using the Sisvar program [20].

2.3. Plant Fertilization Effect and/or M. spectabilis Nymphs Attack on the Damage Score, Regrowth, and Bromatological Components

Forty days after pruning, B. ruziziensis was fertilized as described for experiment one. Plants submitted to fertilizing doses R, H, and C received 0, 5, 15, or 30 nymphs of 4th and 5th instars. For 10 days, plants were evaluated daily and the dead nymphs and the emerged adults were taken out. At the same time, nymphs were restored in to order to maintain the density of each treatment. After this period, nymphs were taken out, and for each plant the damage scores were given, which were adapted to Cardona et al. [21] scale, by three evaluators; moreover, the plants height was assessed. In the next step, the shoots of the plants submitted to the fertilizing dose R, H, and C infested with 30 nymphs or in the absence of them, were cut 7.5 cm above the soil and weighed, dried in an oven at 55°C, and grinded for the chemical-bromatological analysis: lignin, cellulose, in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and crude protein (CP) using nIR (near infrared reflectance). The regrowth was assessed 30 days after being cut.

The assays were conducted in a randomized block, with four insect densities (0, 5, 15, and 30) and three fertilization doses (recommended, half of recommended, and control doses), with ten repetitions, totalizing 120 experimental units.

To evaluate the fertilization effect on the damage score and the regrowth, the data were submitted to variance analysis and the averages were compared by the Tukey test (), whereas, to evaluate the nymph density effect, data were submitted to regression analysis. For bromatological quality of B. ruziziensis the assays were conducted in a randomized block design in a factorial arrangement with two densities (0 and 30) and three fertilization doses (R, H, and C). The data were submitted to variance analysis and the averages were compared by the Tukey test (), by the Sisvar program [20].

2.4. Plant Fertilization Effect and/or M. spectabilis Adults Attack on the Damage Score, Regrowth, and Bromatological Components

B. ruziziensis plants were submitted to different levels of fertilization, as described in experiment one. Sixty days after the second maintenance fertilization, each vase containing signal grass was put inside a metal cage (70 40 40) covered with organza fabric. Ten M. spectabilis adults (five males and five females) were released into each cage or the adults were absent.

Daily, the dead adults were taken out and the same quantity of males and females was restored in order to keep the density of each treatment as well as the male/female ratio. After five days, spittlebugs were taken out and three evaluators attributed the damage score for each plant. Plants were assessed for five days, a period sufficient to visualize the damage, based on previous tests.

The shoots were cut 7.5 cm above the soil and dried in an oven with air circulation for seven days at 55°C. After being dried, the plants were grinded in order to analyze lignin, cellulose, in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and crude protein, using the device nIR (near-infrared reflectance). The regrowth was evaluated 30 days after being cut.

The assays were conducted in a randomized block design in a factorial arrangement 2 3, with two insect densities (0 or 10) and three fertilizations (recommended, half of recommended, and control ones), with seven repetitions, totalizing 42 experimental units.

To evaluate the fertilization effect and the adult’s density on the damage score, regrowth, and bromatological component, data were submitted to variance analysis and the averages were compared by the Tukey test (), by the program of Sisvar [20].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Plant Fertilization Effect on the M. spectabilis Nymph Survival

Fertilization promoted a significant difference on the M. spectabilis nymph survival (, ), being 1.4 times higher when nymphs were kept in plants which received the recommended fertilization dose compared to the control group. The nymphs kept in plants which received half of recommended fertilizer dose were similar to those kept in plants which received no fertilizer and to the ones which received the ideal fertilizer dose (Figure 1). It is suggested that the higher survival will cause population increase of the pest insect in pastures fertilized with NPK, in agreement with Butler et al. [22] who reported a significant effect on the insect population, when NPK elements were used together.

Figure 1: Mahanarva spectabilis nymph survival (%) kept in B. ruziziensis cultivated under recommended (R), half of recommended (H), and control (C) fertilization. Means values followed by the same letter did not differ among them by the Tukey test ().

Management of soil fertility might assume several effects upon the plant quality, which might affect the insect abundance. Some studies documented a higher survival of certain insects when plants received fertilization [23–25]. Nevertheless, how the fertilizers act on the insect population is an area of intense debate, sometimes even contradictory, as a few research results recorded positive, negative, or neutral effects of the fertilizers on the insect population [22].

The crop fertilization might affect plant susceptibility to pest insects by affecting plant resistance to attack or by altering plant acceptability by certain herbivores [17]. Regardless of fertilization, M. spectabilis nymph survival changed from 50 to 70% and, according to Cardona et al. [21], a genotype is only considered resistant to spittlebugs when the survival is lower than 30%, confirming the B. ruziziensis susceptibility to M. spectabilis nymph survival. Treatment of plants with NPK recommended fertilization implies that this cropping practice is not sufficient to make B. ruziziensis change its status from susceptible to resistant to the cercopid.

Although fertilizer application is important for the crop yield, it is necessary to determine the cost benefit of the relation between the maximum crop yield and the susceptibility to pest insect attack on the fertilized crop [26]. Therefore, this crop method should be used with restriction in areas where M. spectabilis reveals pest troubles, since survival levels were high in plants fertilized with NPK. However, the NPK fertilization effect on plant tolerance to the cercopid nymphs and adults attack also should be taken into consideration.

3.2. Fertilization Effect and/or M. spectabilis Nymph and Adults Density on B. ruziziensis Tolerance by the Damage Score

The damage of the leaf area increased significantly in nonfertilized plants ( and ) and on those that received ideal fertilization ( and ) with increasing nymph density from 0 to 15 nymphs and leveling off when plants were maintained with 30 nymphs. The data formed quadratic regressive curves with high correlation coefficients (Figure 2(a)). For the plants that received half of recommended fertilization (H), a significant increase in the damage of leaf area was observed ( and ) with reference to pest insect nymph density, forming a linear model (Figure 2(a)). Plants fertilized and attacked by five, fifteen, and thirty M. spectabilis nymphs displayed a significant reduction on the leaf damage, compared to those kept in soils without fertilization (Table 1).

Table 1: Leaf damage (damage score) and regrowth (%) of Brachiaria ruziziensis cultivated under recommended (R), half of recommended (H), and control (C) fertilization and exposed to different Mahanarva spectabilis nymphs and adults densities.

Fertilization doses
Nymphs density

0
5
15
30

Leaf damage

    C
1.0 ± 0.0 A
2.8 ± 0.3 A
4.1 ± 0.3 A
4.5 ± 0.2 A

    H
1.0 ± 0.0 A
1.6 ± 0.1 B
2.6 ± 0.2 B
3.6 ± 0.3 B

    R
1.0 ± 0.0 A
1.9 ± 0.2 B
3.1 ± 0.2 B
3.4 ± 0.1 B

P
1.000
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001

F
0.000
12.490
17.709
10.668

Regrowth (%)

    C
90.0 ± 10.0 A
40.0 ± 16.3 B
10.0 ± 10.0 A
0 ± 0.0 A

    H
100.0 ± 0.0 A
80.0 ± 13.3 A
10.0 ± 10.0 A
20 ± 13.3 A

    R
80.0 ± 13.3 A
90.0 ± 10.0 A
0.0 ± 0.0 A
0 ± 0.0 A

P
0.3871
0.002
0.728
0.289

F
0.948
6.639
0.316
1.243

Fertilization doses
Adults density

0
10
P
F

Leaf damage

    C
0 ± 0.0 Ab
3.9 ± 0.14 Aa
<0.001
333.333

    H
0 ± 0.0 Ab
3.1 ± 0.14 Ba
<0.001
187.500

    R
0 ± 0.0 Ab
2.7 ± 0.18 Ca
<0.001
120.000

P
1.000
<0.001

F
0.000
27.220

Regrowth (%)

    C
100.0 ± 0.0 Aa
0.0 ± 0.0 Bb
<0.001
52.500

    H
100.0 ± 0.0 Aa
71.4 ± 18.4 Ab
0.047
4.286

    R
100.0 ± 0.0 Aa
86.7 ± 14.3 Aa
0.309
1.071

P
1.000
<0.001

F
0.000
22.143

Means values followed by the same small letter in the row and by the same capital letter in the column are not significant (ANOVA followed by a Tukey test ( ≤ 0.05)).

P and F are values of variance analysis.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: Leaf damage (a) (damage score) and regrowth (%) (b) of Brachiaria ruziziensis cultivated under recommended (R), half of recommended (H), and control (C) fertilization and exposed to different Mahanarva spectabilis nymphs densities.

Ideal fertilization provides a suitable balance among the essential elements to the plant, which might stimulate the resistance to the insect attack [27], through secondary compounds that can modify the food quality and reduce palatability [28]. This was confirmed in the present research, where the three essential elements NPK used together promoted tolerance for M. spectabilis nymphs, confirming results of Fernandes et al. [29] that recorded Coffea arabica tolerance fertilized with high N and K concentration to Coccus viridis attack. According to Miyasaka et al. [30], the use of N and K isolated or together is fundamental in the insect response to the plant attack, whereas N or NK promoted increase in the aphid Sipha flava response to the Pennisetum clandestinum attack; however, no difference was observed on the injuries of these aphids when only potassium was applied.

Nitrogen is a limiting component of the homopteran diet [31] and these insects might consume daily up to 100 times its own body weight to obtain enough nitrogen [30], as this element is crucial for the insect’s survival [29, 32]. We suggest that nitrogen existing in the fertilizers used on B. ruziziensis plants may have reduced M. spectabilis herbivory, as low consumption was sufficient for obtaining their necessary nitrogen. In addition, the potassium builds resistance in the cellular walls [33], which might have promoted the reduction of spittlebugs feeding rate, consequently, reducing damage of the plants.

Damage of leaf area increased significantly in nonfertilized plants and in those which received the half of recommended fertilization and recommended fertilization, when exposed to 10 adults, compared to plants exposed to zero M. spectabilis adults (Table 1), indicating that this insect density is enough to cause damage regardless of the applied fertilization. Nevertheless, within the density of 10 adults, injuries on the nonfertilized plants were observed (control group) in more than 68% of the leaf area (3.9 on the damage score), reducing significantly the damage verified on fertilized plants with the recommended dose, or half of this one. These results confirm those from Scanavachi et al. [34] and De Bortoli et al. [35], who observed higher damage when there was no fertilization in corn and sorgo, exposed to its main pests. In this study, when the plants were fertilized, the damage averages were not higher than 50% (2.7 on the damage score) (Table 1). Higher injuries (75%) on B. ruziziensis fertilized with 50 kgha⁻¹of NPK exposed for 10 days to nine spittlebugs Aeneolamia varia (Fabricius) were recorded by Cardona et al. [21].

3.3. Fertilization Effect and M. spectabilis Nymphs and Adults Density on B. ruziziensis Tolerance by Regrowth

It was verified that a M. spectabilis nymph density increase caused reductions in regrowth percentage for nonfertilized plants ( and ), with half of fertilization ( and ) as well as for those which received the recommended fertilization ( and ) (Figure 2(b)), forming quadratic regressive curves with high correlation coefficients. It is suggested that this might have occurred due to the great amount of sap sucked out by the nymphs, impoverishing the plant from its reserves and compromising its regrowth capacity. According to Valério [36], the frequent attacks from Mahanarva sp. might reduce the volume of radicular system and decrease grass persistence.

When nymphs are absent, the regrowth was significantly equal, regardless of the fertilization. In low density (5 nymphs), it was observed that fertilization promoted higher regrowth percentage. In this way, Valério [36] emphasizes that well-managed pastures and fertilized soils are less vulnerable to the pest attack. However, in higher densities (15 and 30) there was no effect of fertilization on the regrowth, which did not reach 20% (Table 1). Considering the low percentage of regrowth of the plants submitted to 15 M. spectabilis nymphs, regardless of the fertilization, it is recommended that forage by grazing animals, or even cutting and storage when the density of insect per plant is lower than 15 nymphs; it guarantees the persistence of the forage. Moreover, fertilization is only recommended in pastures with low nymph density, which according to Auad et al. [37] normally occurs at the beginning of the rainy season.

When B. ruziziensis was exposed to 10 M. spectabilis adults, the regrowth was significantly reduced in nonfertilized plants and in those which received the half of fertilization. However, this alteration was not seen in plants which received the recommended dose of fertilization (Table 1). There was 100% regrowth in plants that were not exposed to adults, regardless of the application and dosage of fertilizer, which was different from the Cecato et al.’s [38] results, who observed a regrowth increase in B. brizantha, marandu cultivar, with the application of increasing N and P doses.

Nevertheless, when the plants were exposed to 10 adults, regrowth did not occur in signal grass nonfertilized plants, differing from those which received half of recommended dose and the recommended dose, treatments whose regrowth rates were 71% and 86%, respectively (Table 1). The relation between the damage caused by 10 adults and regrowth was evident. Nonfertilized plants showed a 3.9 damage score, and they did not have regrowth while those which were fertilized, having a damage score of at least 2.7, had regrowth over 70%. This result confirms that the deleterious effect of the pest was mitigated, causing tolerance promotion when the macronutrients NPK were supplied. Fertilizers might promote pasture recovery when M. spectabilis pressure is high. Meyer [39] argues that the nutrient availability in the soil affects damage caused by herbivores and the capacity of plants to recover. Nevertheless, both factors are rarely taken into consideration together.

3.4. Effect of Fertilization and M. spectabilis Nymphs and Adults Density in the Quality of B. ruziziensis

Fertilization did not promote significant effects on the cellulose, lignin, ADF, and NDF contents and, consequently, on the B. ruziziensis IVDMD when M. spectabilis nymphs and adults were absent (Table 2). Rosa et al. [40] did not check for a nitrogen fertilization effect on the B. decumbens cellulose content and IVDMD; however, they recorded reduction in lignin content. In the same way, Cecato et al. [38] did not verify an effect on B. brizantha, marandu cultivar, digestibility submitted to nitrogen fertilization.

Table 2: Cellulose, lignin, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), and crude protein (CP) contents in Brachiaria  ruziziensis plants, cultivated under recommended (R), half of recommended (H), and control (C) fertilization and exposed to different Mahanarva  spectabilis densities.

Fertilization doses
Nymphs density
P
F
Adults density
P
F

0
30
0
10

Cellulose (%)

    C
40.0 ± 2.2
49.6 ± 2.3
0.015
6.352
43.4 ± 3.1
47.7 ± 1.2
0.206
1.674

    H
45.5 ± 3.4
49.3 ± 3.5
0.304
1.083
44.1 ± 2.6
44.7 ± 1.3
0.785
0.076

    R
45.6 ± 1.8
46.4 ± 1.6
0.818
0.054
47.6 ± 2.6
41.9 ± 2.7
0.035
4.88

P
0.233
0.648

0.320
0.095

F
1.448
0.434

1.171
2.526

Lignin (%)

    C
5.7 ± 0.3
5.5 ± 0.2
0.508
0.445
6.3 ± 0.3
6.1 ± 0.2
0.415
0.683

    H
5.8 ± 0.2
5.7 ± 0.3
0.700
0.15
6.3 ± 0.1
6.0 ± 0.2
0.309
1.072

    R
6.1 ± 0.3
6.3 ± 0.2
0.579
0.311
6.5 ± 0.3
6.5 ± 0.3
0.983
0.000

P
0.285
0.023

0.601
0.118

F
1.277
4.064

0.512
2.272

DNF (%)

    C
71.2 ± 0.9
73.6 ± 0.9
0.070
3.447
77.0 ± 0.7
75.9 ± 0.4
0.15
2.172

    H
73.7 ± 0.9
75.8 ± 1.1
0.111
2.641
75.9 ± 0.5
75.0 ± 0.4
0.264
1.292

    R
72.4 ± 1.0
75.8 ± 0.9
0.015
6.356
76.2 ± 1.0
75.9 ± 0.5
0.721
0.130

P
0.152
0.205

0.32
0.401

F
1.949
1.624

1.168
0.930

DAF (%)

    C
42.1 ± 0.9
43.8 ± 0.9
0.139
2.272
45.9 ± 0.9
44.9 ± 0.6
0.363
0.854

    H
44.7 ± 0.7
45.4 ± 0.6
0.499
0.463
45.2 ± 0.5
44.1 ± 0.3
0.32
1.027

    R
43.7 ± 0.9
45.6 ± 0.8
0.093
2.953
45.9 ± 1.2
45.0 ± 0.9
0.419
0.67

P
0.063
0.213

0.771
0.671

F
2.915
1.586

0.262
0.400

IVDMD

    C
55.8 ± 1.3
52.1 ± 1.2
0.053
3.948
50.8 ± 1.0
51.1 ± 0.7
0.848
0.037

    H
54.7 ± 1.4
51.8 ± 1.1
0.129
2.396
51.2 ± 1.0
52.2 ± 0.5
0.439
0.615

    R
57.4 ± 1.5
52.3 ± 1.3
0.080
7.760
59.8 ± 1.3
50.0 ± 1.0
0.546
0.373

P
0.331
0.970

0.963
0.266

F
1.123
0.032

0.039
1.366

CP (%)

    C
5.6 ± 0.3
4.9 ± 0.2
0.255
1.331
4.1 ± 0.1
3.8 ± 0.2
0.254
1.354

    H
5.5 ± 0.2
4.7 ± 0.5
0.152
2.13
4.0 ± 0.2
3.9 ± 0.2
0.644
0.218

    R
6.6 ± 0.7
4.4 ± 0.3
0.060
6.493
3.6 ± 0.2
3.7 ± 0.2
0.801
0.065

P
0.096
0.602

0.143
0.683

F
2.444
0.508

2.051
0.383

P and F are values of variance analysis followed by a Tukey test.

When the plants were exposed to 30 nymphs or ten adults, fertilization did not promote a significant difference on cellulose percentage, NDF, ADF, and IVDMD. Lignin was not altered in plants submitted to the attack of ten adults, regardless of the fertilization. However, there was a significant lignin content increase in the recommended fertilization plants in the presence of 30 nymphs of the pest insect but this alteration was not sufficient to change IVDMD.

There was a significant cellulose increase in nonfertilized plants and NDF in those with the recommended fertilization and exposed to 30 cercopid nymphs, compared to those without the insect presence. This difference was not observed for lignin, ADF, and IVDMD. Moreover, in fertilized plants exposed to 30 nymphs there was no significant alteration in cellulose, lignin, ADF, NDF, and IVDMD contents compared to those in which nymphs were absent (Table 2).

We observed a significant decrease in cellulose content only with the recommended fertilization in plants exposed to 10 adults, compared to those without bugs. The same was not verified for plants without fertilization and with half fertilization, regardless of the adult density. Lignin, ADF, and NDF content were not altered by the adult density, regardless of the fertilization (Table 2).

When the plants were submitted to different fertilization doses and M. spectabilis nymph and adult density, there were no significant effects on the crude protein content percentage of B. ruziziensis (Table 2). It is worthy emphasizing that the present study crude protein values were lower than the critical value of 7% [6], a limiting condition to animal production. Considering that the crude protein content is directly related to the forage age, it is suggested that the results found occurred due to forage growth, as a result of 52 days after being cut, because tropical grasses have their protein and fiber content reduced as they grow older, which results in a low digestibility and nutritional value of the forage [41].

The assessment of M. spectabilis effect on B. ruziziensis quality is unpublished. We highlighted that 30 nymphs, or 10 adults, attack of this pest insect did not promote alteration on forage quality.

Fertilization with NPK promoted greater nymph M. spectabilis survival on B. ruziziensis; however, it reduced damage by nymphs and adults of the pest insect and did not alter the forage quality. In addition, fertilization was sufficient for the forage recovery, when exposed to 5 nymphs or 10 adults of M. spectabilis.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), Indicadores IBGE, Contas Nacionais Trimestrais, Indicadores de Volume e Valores Correntes, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2011.

C. Costa, P. R. L. Meirelles, J. J. Silva, and M. A. Factori, “Evolução das pastagens cultivadas e do efeito bovino no Brasil,” Veterinária E Zootecnia, vol. 15, pp. 8–17, 2008.

J. R. Valério, “Cigarrinha das pastagens. Circular Técnico,” Documento 179, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Corte, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009.

C. T. Karia, J. B. Duarte, and A. C. G. Araújo, “Desenvolvimento de cultivares do gênero Brachiaria (trin.) Griseb. no Brasil,” Documento 163, Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina-DF, Brazil, 2006.

J. B. R. Abreu and F. A. Monteiro, “Produção e nutrição do capim marandu em função de adubação nitrogenada e estádios de crescimento,” Boletim da Indústria Animal, vol. 56, pp. 137–146, 1999.

P. J. Van Soest, “Cell wall matrix interactions and degradation. Session synopsis,” in Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility, H. G. Jung, D. R. Buxton, R. D. Hatfirld, et al., Eds., pp. 377–395, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis, USA, 1994.

A. M. Auad, A. D. Simões, A. V. Pereira et al., “Seleção de genótipos de capim elefante quanto à resistência à cigarrinhas-das-pastagens,” Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1077–1081, 2007.

A. M. Auad and C. A. Carvalho, “Desenvolvimento e viabilidade de ovos de Mahanarva spectabilis (Distant, 1909) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) submetidos a diferentes regimes de hidratação,” Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, vol. 76, pp. 711–714, 2009.

A. M. Auad, F. Souza Sobrinho, R. L. Amaral et al., “Seleção de progênies de B. ruziziensis quanto à resistência à Mahanarva spectabilis,” in Proceedings of the 45a Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, Lavras-MG, Brazil, 2008.

G. B. Hewitt, “Grazing management as a means of regulating spittlebug (Homoptera: Cercopidae) numbers in Central Brazil,” Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 697–707, 1988.

J. C. Souza, R. A. Silva, P. R. Reis, D. S. Queiroz, and D. B. Silva, “Cigarrinhas-das-pastagens: histórico, bioecologia, prejuízos, monitoramento e medidas de controle,” Circular Técnica 42, Portal da Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (Epamig), Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2008.

V. Thompson, “Associative nitrogen fixation, C4 photosynthesis, and the evolution of spittlebugs (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) as major pests of neotropical sugarcane and forage grasses,” Bulletin of Entomological Research, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 189–200, 2004.

J. R. Valério and M. C. M. Oliveira, “Parasitism of spittlebug eggs (Homoptera: Cercopidae) by the microhymenopteran Anagrus urichi Pickles (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in Campo Grande, MS, Brazil,” Neotropical Entomology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 137–138, 2005.

C. Cardona, J. W. Miles, E. Zuñiga, and G. Sotelo, “Independence of resistance in Brachiaria spp. to nymphs or to adult spittlebugs (Hemiptera: Cercopidae): implications for breeding for resistance,” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 1860–1865, 2010.

F. S. Sobrinho, A. M. Auad, and F. J. D. S. Lédo, “Genetic variability in Brachiaria ruziziensis for resistance to spittlebugs,” Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 83–88, 2010.

J. R. Valério and W. W. Koller, “Proposição para o manejo integrado das cigarrinhas-das-pastagens,” Pasturas Tropicales, vol. 15, no. 3, 1993.

M. A. Altieri and C. I. Nicholls, “Soil fertility management and insect pests: harmonizing soil and plant health in agroecosystems,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 203–211, 2003.

D. C. Peck, “Distribución y reconocimiento del salivazo de los pastos (Homoptera: Cercopidae) en la Costa Caribe de Colombia,” Pasturas Tropicales, vol. 24, pp. 4–15, 2002.

A. C. Ribeiro, P. T. G. Guimarães, and V. H. Alvarez, Recomendação para o Uso de Corretivos e Fertilizantes em Minas Gerais, 5a Aproximação, Comissão de Fertilidade do Solo do Estado de Minas Gerais, Viçosa, Brazil, 1999.

D. F. Ferreira, “SISVAR: um programa para análises e ensaio de estatística,” Revista Symposium, vol. 6, pp. 36–41, 2008.

C. Cardona, J. W. Miles, and G. Sotelo, “An improved methodology for massive screening of Brachiaria spp. genotypes for resistance to Aeneolamia varia (Homoptera: Cercopidae),” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 490–496, 1999.

J. Butler, M. P. D. Garratt, and S. R. Leather, “Fertilisers and insect herbivores: a meta-analysis,” Annals of Applied Biology, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 223–233, 2012.

P. L. Adkisson, “The influence of fertilizer applications on population of Heliothis zea and certain insect predators,” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 51, pp. 144–149, 1958.

N. T. Chang, B. R. Wiseman, R. E. Lynch, and D. H. Habeck, “Influence of N fertilizer on the resistance of selected grasses to fall armyworm larvae,” Journal of Agricultural Entomology, vol. 2, pp. 137–146, 1985.

D. A. Guenther, K. T. Gardner, and D. C. Thompson, “Influence of nutrient levels in Tamarix on Diorhabda sublineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) survival and fitness with implications for biological control,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 66–72, 2011.

S. Facknath and B. Lalljee, “Effect of soil-applied complex fertiliser on an insect-host plant relationship: Liriomyza trifolii on Solanum tuberosum,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 67–77, 2005.

J. M. Luna, “Influence of soil fertility practices on agricultural pests,” in Proccedings of the 6th international science conference of IFOAM on global perspectives on agroecology and sustainable agricultural systems, pp. 589–600, Santa Cruz, Calif, USA, 1988.

K. A. Leiss, F. Maltese, Y. H. Choi, R. Verpoorte, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer, “Identification of chlorogenic acid as a resistance factor for Thrips in chrysanthemum,” Plant Physiology, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 1567–1575, 2009.

F. L. Fernandes, M. C. Picanço, M. E. S. Fernandes, R. B. Queiroz, V. M. Xavier, and H. E. P. Martinez, “The effects of nutrients and secondary compounds of Coffea arabica on the behavior and development of Coccus viridis,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 333–341, 2012.

S. C. Miyasaka, J. D. Hansen, and G. K. Fukumoto, “Resistance to yellow sugarcane aphid: screening kikuyu and other grasses,” Crop Protection, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 503–510, 2007.

W. J. Mattson, “Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 11, pp. 119–161, 1980.

S. J. Moe, R. S. Stelzer, M. R. Forman, W. S. Harploe, T. Daufresne, and T. Yoshida, “Recent advances in ecological stoichiometry: insights for population and community ecology,” Oikos, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2005.

H. N. Sampaio, M. F. C. Barros, J. V. Oliveira, F. S. Lima, and E. M. R. Pedrosa, “Efeito de doses de nitrogênio e potássio nas injúrias provocadas por Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) na cultura do milho,” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, vol. 2, pp. 219–222, 2007.

F. A. Scanavachi, R. A. Figueiredo, F. H. Oliveira, M. H. Calafiori, and R. C. Andrade, “Diferentes níveis de potássio influenciando a lagarta do cartucho Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1979) em duas variedades de milho (Zea mays),” Revista Ecossistema, vol. 29, pp. 5–8, 2004.

S. A. De Bortoli, H. O. S. Doria, N. M. M. S. Albergaria, and M. V. Botti, “Aspectos biológicos e danos de Diatraea saccharalis (Fabr., 1794) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) em sorgo cultivado sob diferentes doses de nitrogênio e potássio,” Ciência e Agrotecnologia, vol. 29, pp. 267–273, 2005.

J. R. Valério, “Considerações sobre a morte de pastagens de Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu em alguns estados do Centro e Norte do Brasil: enfoque entomológico,” in Comunicado Técnico, vol. 98, 2006.

A. M. Auad, C. A. Carvalho, D. M. Silva, and F. Deresz, “Flutuação populacional de cigarrinhas das pastagens em braquiária e capim-elefante,” Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, vol. 44, pp. 1205–1208, 2011.

U. Cecato, F. Y. Yanaka, M. R. T. Brito Filho et al., “Influência da adubação nitrogenada e fosfatada na produção, na rebrota e no perfilhamento do capim-marandu (Brachiaria brizantha),” Acta Scientiarum, vol. 22, pp. 817–822, 2000.

G. A. Meyer, “Interactive effects of soil fertility and herbivory on Brassica nigra,” Oikos, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 433–441, 2000.

B. Rosa, R. A. Reis, K. T. De Resende, S. Do Nascimento Kronka, and C. C. Jobim, “Nutritive value of Brachiaria decumbens stapf cv. basilisk hay submitted to anhydrous ammonia or urea treatment,” Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 815–822, 1998.

R. S. Aguiar, H. M. Vasquez, and J. F. C. Silva, “Produção e composição químico-bromatológica do capim-furachão (Panicum repens L.) sob adubação e diferentes idades de corte,” Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, vol. 29, pp. 325–333, 2000.