Veterinary Medicine InternationalVolume 2011 (2011), Article ID 839737, 5 pagesdoi:10.4061/2011/839737

Research Article

Effect of Feed Restriction during Pregnancy on Performance and Productivity of New Zealand White Rabbit Does

Abeer Nafeaa,¹ Souad Abd Elfattah Ahmed,² and Said Fat Hallah³

¹Physiology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Moshtohor, Benha University, Benha, Egypt²Animal Hygiene, Behavior and Management Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Moshtohor, Benha University, Benha, Egypt³Physiology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Menofia University, El-Sadate Branch, El-Sadate City, Egypt

Received 25 December 2010; Accepted 4 July 2011

Academic Editor: Nigel R. Perkins

Copyright © 2011 Abeer Nafeaa et al. Abeer Nafeaa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

This study aimed to evaluate effect of stage of feed restriction on performance and productivity of pregnant does. New Zealand white female rabbits were randomly divided into three groups. Control group was provided daily with 185 g of food increased to 200 g from the 15th day of gestation. was offered daily a restricted amount of food (60% restriction, 111 g) for the first half of pregnancy and then offered 200 g of food daily till parturition. was provided with 185 g of food daily through the first half of pregnancy and then offered daily a restricted amount of food (60% restriction, 120 g) for the second half. After parturition, food was provided adlibitum. Maternal body weights, litter size, litter weight, and average body weight of kits at kindling of showed no change, whereas showed significant reduction in the weights of does at the 4th week of pregnancy and at kindling. The birth weight and weaning weight of were significantly reduced. The highest mortality was recorded in kits of . No significant differences in blood parameters or serum prolactin were observed. The serum protein was significantly reduced .

1. Introduction

It is a common practice in commercial rabbit production to feed rabbit does to appetite directly after mating and during gestation. The young does fed ad libitum with diets of high energy level often show parturition problems, with the subsequent reduction of the number of newborn rabbits, linked to excessive fatness [1]. In order to reduce the excessive fatness of young does, restricted feeding during pregnancy is frequently applied to obtain uniformity in their body weights, to avoid fattening and high mortalities around parturition [2], to increase voluntary intake at the beginning of the lactation period, and to allow a long productive life [3]. Also, feed restriction could be exploited in the feeding regimen of rabbits, especially in periods of inadequate supply of concentrates and forages [4]. But, feed restriction for rabbits has to be considered as a stress condition and applied with attention when other stressors occur [5].

It is well known that fetal growth is dependent on an adequate supply of oxygen and nutrients crossing the placenta from the mother [6]. Moreover, nutrient supply to embryos and fetuses is exclusively dependent upon the mother [7]. Consequently, as the body size of the does decreases, the litter weight at kindling also reduces [8]. Furthermore, reduction of total caloric intake during pregnancy, eating disorders, and related indicators such as low pregnancy weights of does account for a significant proportion of intrauterine growth retardation [9]. Moreover, factors that perturb fetal substrate supply and are known to be responsible for much fetal growth restriction, such as placental insufficiency or poor maternal nutrition, are implicated in the long-term programming of adult dysfunction and disease [10]. Previous studies concluded that, after the restoration of maternal nutrition over the second half of gestation, fetal adipose tissue development is enhanced, which may act to place these individuals at increased risk of obesity in later life [11]. However, details of the influence of restricted feeding of the pregnant does on their blood parameters shortly after parturition and on the performance of their offspring are still obscure.

So, the aim of this work is to evaluate the effect of the stage of feed restriction during pregnancy on maternal body weights, weights of offspring at birth and weaning as well as some hematological and biochemical parameters of the young does.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

New Zealand white female rabbits (sixty females) of 20 weeks of age (first kindling) and weighed were randomly divided into three equal groups: Group 1 (control group): rabbits were provided daily with 185 g of food increased to 200 g from the 15th day of gestation (daily food intake of pregnant does according to [12]); Group 2 (, early feed restriction): rabbits were offered daily a restricted amount of food (60% restriction, 111 g) for the first half of pregnancy (the first fifteen days) and then offered 200 g of food daily till parturition; Group 3 (, late feed restriction) : rabbits were provided with 185 g of food daily through the first half of pregnancy and then offered daily a restricted amount of food (60% restriction, 120 g) for the second half of pregnancy. Treatments started after natural mating. After parturition, all does and their young were provided ad libitum amount of feed till weaning. Rabbits were reared in individual cages (50 cm × 50 cm × 30 cm) of galvanized wire net, equipped with an automatic drinker and a manual feeder. Rabbits were provided with a commercial pellet diet, containing 18% crude protein and 2700 Kcal/Kg ration metabolizable energy (ME). Does were submitted to a 16-hour photoperiod daily and the minimum ambient temperature was set at 18 ± 2°C. Fourteen days after mating, does were palpated to check pregnancy and nonpregnant does were excluded from the experiment. Five days before kindling, does were provided an access to nest boxes that were attached to each cage. Does were weighed individually at the start of the experiment then every two weeks and just after kindling. After kindling, the nest boxes were checked for live and still born kits. For each doe, the living kits were weighed to obtain the total litter weight at birth which were then divided by the number of kits (litter size at birth) to calculate the mean kits weight at birth. Then kits were weighed at 21 days of age and at the day of weaning (the 30th day). Kit’s mortality rate % was recorded for each group from birth till weaning.

2.2. Blood Collection

Blood samples were collected from does five days after kindling [13]. The blood samples were collected in the morning (10.00 a.m.) from the ear veins. Two blood samples were taken from each female: one sample was taken into a tube containing EDTA for determination of the hematological parameters and the other was taken without an anticoagulant, centrifuged at 3000 g, and then the serum was collected and stored at −20°C until assayed for prolactin hormone and the total protein concentration.

2.3. Hematological and Biochemical Analysis

Packed cell volume (PCV), red blood cell number (RBCs), and hemoglobin concentration (Hb) were determined using Wintrobe’s microhematocrite, improved Neubauer hemocytometer, and cyanomethemoglobin method, respectively. The erythrocytic indices, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were calculated according to [14]. Determination of serum prolactin was done according to [15] while determination of total protein concentration was done according to [16].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data collected were subjected to one-way ANOVA. Differences among means were tested by Duncan’s multiple range test.

3. Results and Discussion

Results of the effect of the stage of feed restriction during pregnancy on maternal body weights were presented in Table 1. Feed restriction during the first half of gestation did not affect the maternal body weights, whereas feed restriction during the second half of gestation was accompanied with significant reduction in the weights of does at the 4th week of pregnancy and at kindling. This decrease became nonsignificant from the second week after kindling till the end of the experiment. Similar results were recorded by many investigations which found that dams lost a significant amount of body weights throughout the gestation period as a result of undernutrition, but they were able to catch up to the ad libitum group by day 10 postnatal [17]. Other research recorded that, after delivery, the control group exhibited higher body weight than the restricted does, but at time of weaning all the mothers had similar live weights [13]. The results of the present study could be attributed to that as the postmiddle period of pregnancy is vulnerable to effects of reduced food consumption in pregnant rabbits [18], food-restricted females mobilized body fat and reduced their energy expenditure for maintenance and activity especially when feed restriction occurred shortly before parturition [19]. That could be the cause of the significant reduction observed in the weights of does subjected to feed restriction during the second half of gestation from the 4th week of pregnancy till the kindling. After kindling, these does were provided ad libitum amount of feed and they were able to catch up to the control group by the 15th day of delivery. That could be because, the animal under quantitative and qualitative feed restriction exhibited compensative growth as a consequence of increased food intake after restricted feeding [13]. Consequently, when food was provided ad libitum to the previously restricted does, weight gain was significantly higher than that in the ad libitum group [11, 20].

Table 1: The effect of the stage of feed restriction during pregnancy on maternal body weights (means ± SE).

Parameter
Group

Control

Weight of does at the start (g)
2860.00 ± 77.67a
2790.00 ± 165.63a
2873.33 ± 38.44a

Weight of does after two weeks (g)
3216.67 ± 72.65a
2966.67 ± 130.17a
3100.00 ± 76.38a

Weight of does after four weeks (g)
3500.00 ± 57.74a
3443.33 ± 34.80a
3196.67 ± 68.88b

Weight ofdoes at kindling day (g)
3140.00 ± 66.58a
3083.33 ± 95.28a
2783.33 ± 70.55b

Weight of does after six weeks (g)
3540.00 ± 95.39a
3490.00 ± 66.58a
3480.00 ± 58.59a

Weight of does after eight weeks (g)
3593.33 ± 63.59a
3556.67 ± 177.42a
3540.00 ± 63.51a

a, bMeans with the different superscripts in the same raw are significantly different (). : early feed restriction. : late feed restriction.

The present study revealed that feeding level during gestation period did not affect the litter size at birth (Table 2). There were no abortions, external, visceral, or skeletal malformations associated with any of the levels of maternal body weight loss due to feed restriction. Similar results were obtained in rabbits [21] and in rats [17]. However, previous studies investigated the effect of feeding level during first gestation in young does on reproductive performance and recorded a reduced number of live born kits as a result of low-feeding level during early gestation [22] and the litter size increased with increased weight of does [23, 24]. Also, feed restriction of pregnant does resulted in developmental abnormalities expressed by abortion, reduced fetal weight, and alterations in ossification [25]. One potential explanation for the results of the present study is that the young rabbit does could maintain normal blood supply to their embryos during this feeding restriction level as indicated by the hematological results which revealed no changes in hematological parameters due to feed restriction (Table 3).

Table 2: The effect of the stage of feed restriction during pregnancy on litter performance (means ± SE).

Parameter
Group

Control

Litter Size at birth
6.00 ± 0.58a
5.67 ± 0.33a
5.00 ± 0.58a

Total litter weight at birth (g)
304.17 ± 8.21a
320.00 ± 17.32a
236.67 ± 8.82b

Mean kit weight at birth (g)
51.57 ± 4.60a
57.22 ± 6.55a
48.22 ± 3.86 a

Mean kit weight at the 21st day (g)
380.00 ± 11.55b
446.67 ± 8.82a
308.33 ± 11.67c

Individual weaning body weight (g)
471.67 ± 14.81b
558.33 ± 16.19a
411.67 ± 7.26c

Mortality rate %
4.33 ± 0.67a
3.33 ± 0.88a
7.00 ± 0.58 b

a, b, c Means with the different superscripts in the same raw are significantly different (). : early feed restriction. : late feed restriction.

Table 3: The effect of the stage of feed restriction during pregnancy on hematological findings of does at the 5th day post partum (means ± SE).

Parameter
Group

Control

RBCs (10⁶/μl)
3.64 ± 0.27a
3.76 ± 0.32a
3.33 ± 0.15a

PCV (%)
30.65 ± 0.62a
29.26 ± 0.59a
28.34 ± 0.75a

Hb (g/dl)
9.14 ± 0.54a
9.24 ± 0.39a
8.31 ± 0.41a

MCV (fl)
84.79 ± 4.52a
78.61 ± 5.21a
85.39 ± 2.17a

MCH (pg)
25.15 ± 0.64a
24.74 ± 1.19a
24.98 ± 0.12a

MCHC (%)
29.79 ± 1.36a
31.59 ± 1.29a
29.30 ± 0.86a

Prolactin
3.85 ± 0.15a
4.20 ± 0.15a
3.51 ± 0.29a

Total protein (g/dl)
5.63 ± 0.15 a
5.90 ± 0.26 a
4.92 ± 0.16 b

a, bMeans with the different superscripts in the same raw are significantly different ().: early feed restriction. : late feed restriction.

In the present investigation it was clear that feed restriction during the first half of gestation increased the litter weight at birth and the mean kit weights from birth till weaning as compared to the control group but the differences were nonsignificant at any experimental periods (Table 2). These results disagree with the result obtained by a previous study which recorded a significant decrease in the weights of fetuses carried by does subjected to different degrees of feed restriction maintained for various periods during gestation [26, 27]. The obtained results could be ascertained by that, in the first and second weeks after feed restriction, compensatory feed intake occurred and does which ate more than average during the last week of gestation had heavier kits than does eating less than average feed intake [21], and in most instances, the energy level of the diet fed to the does influenced birth weight (higher energy level, greater weight) [2].

On the other hand, feed restriction during the second half of gestation significantly decreased the litter weight at birth as well as the postnatal pup weights; however, the differences were significant only from the 21th day till weaning (Table 2). Similar results were obtained by some previous studies which recorded that offsprings from undernourished group were significantly smaller at birth and were significantly less active at all ages independent of postnatal nutrition [28]. The reduced litter weight at birth of in the present study could be attributed to the significantly reduced total protein concentration measured in the serum of the does (Table 3) where it is well known that the maternal body composition and diet are thought to affect the fetal development as a result of both direct effects on substrate availability to the fetus and indirectly through changes in placental functions and structure [29]. Furthermore, it was recorded that birth weight of rabbit kits was correlated with daily weight gain and weight at weaning [30]. So the reduction observed in mean kit weights of from birth till weaning could be attributed to the reduced birth weight not to the amount of milk intake (no-significant differences were recorded between control and feed-restricted does in serum prolactin concentrations (Table 3).

As regarding the mortality rate % among the offspring from birth till weaning, the pups of feed-restricted does during the second half of gestation showed a significantly higher mortality rate % than the kits of the control does and feed-restricted does during the second half of gestation period (Table 2). The result disagreed with the result recorded in a previous research [13] which recorded similar number of rabbits at weaning as well as similar mortality rates for all groups (kits of control does and kits of does under different nutritive levels). The result recorded in the present study could be attributed to the significantly reduced litter weight as well as the reduced kit weight of at birth, whereas within any given rabbit breed there is a close correlation between the weight of offspring at birth and their viability [18]. Furthermore, a previous study [31] concluded that, in the medium-sized breeds (including New Zealand white rabbits), the minimum birth weight consistent with the survival was between 40 and 45 g which was very close to the birth weight of in the present study.

The blood parameters and serum prolactin concentrations of the does at the 5th day post partum were shown in Table 3; there were no significant differences in RBCs, Hb, PCV, MCV, MCH, or MCHC values between the control and feed-restricted groups. The obtained results agreed with the results obtained by [32] who concluded that hematological examination of pregnant does revealed variations in several blood parameters only in animals subjected to restricted feeding at 20 g/head/day when blood samples were collected on gestation day 19. Also, there were no significant differences recorded in serum prolactin concentrations between the control and feed-restricted groups. Similar results were obtained in rat [33], in ewes [11], and in mare [34], whereas, a previous study recorded some specific changes in the endocrine status during food restriction depending on the severity of food restriction and its duration [35].

Feed restriction during the first half of gestation did not affect the serum protein level whereas feed restriction during the second half of gestation significantly decreased the total protein as compared with the control group and this finding reflected low nutritive conditions due to restricted feeding as previously reported by [32, 36]. The significantly reduced total protein concentrations measured in serum of feed restricted does at the second half of gestation could be the cause of the significantly reduced weights of their litters at birth.

4. Conclusion

In order to reduce the excessive fatness of young rabbit does, restricted feeding during the first half (the first two weeks) of gestation is recommended as feed restriction for 15 days during early gestation does not affect the performance of young does, which had been fed to appetite during rearing.

References

L. Fortun-Lamothe and F. Lebas, “Effects of dietary energy level and source on foetal development and energy balance in concurrently pregnant and lactating primiparous rabbit does,” Animal Science, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 615–620, 1996.

J. M. Rommers, B. Kemp, R. Meijerhof, and J. P. T. M. Noordhuizen, “The effect of litter size before weaning on subsequent body development, feed intake, and reproductive performance of young rabbit does,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 1973–1982, 2001.

G. G. Partridge, Y. Daniels, and R. A. Fordyce, “The effects of energy intake during pregnancy in doe rabbits on pup birth weight, milk output and maternal body composition change in the ensuing lactation,” Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 107, pp. 697–708, 1986.

A. Yakubu, A. E. Salako, A. O. Ladokun, M. M. Adua, and T. U. K. Bature, “Effects of feed restriction on performance, carcass yield, relative organ weights and some linear body measurements of weaner rabbits,” Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 391–396, 2007.

F. Bovera, C. Di Meo, S. Marono, N. Vella, and A. Nizza, “Feed restriction during summer: effect on rabbit growth performance,” in Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress of Nutrition and Digestive Physiology, Verona, Italy, 2008.

J. S. Robinson, J. A. Owens, and P. C. Owens, “Fetal growth and growth retardation,” in Textbook of Fetal Physiology, G. D. Thorburn and R. Harding, Eds., pp. 83–94, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1994.

Z. Szendrő and L. Maertens, “Maternal effects during pregnancy and lactation in rabbits,” Acta Agraria Kaposvariensis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–21, 2001.

S. Holdas and Z. Szendro, “Breeds of rabbits,” in Breeds of Domestic Animals, S. Mihok, Ed., Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary, 2001.

M. S. Kramer, “Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 663–737, 1993.

D. J. P. Barker, Mothers, Babies and Health in Later Life, Churchill Livingstone, London, UK, 1998.

J. Bispham, G. S. Gopalakrishnan, J. Dandrea, V. Wilson, H. Budge, D. H. Keisler, F. B. Pipkin, T. Stephenson, and M. E. Symonds, “Maternal endocrine adaptation throughout pregnancy to nutritional manipulation: consequences for maternal plasma leptin and cortisol and the programming of fetal adipose tissue development,” Endocrinology, vol. 144, no. 8, pp. 3575–3585, 2003.

E. G. Moody, Rabbit Learning Activities in Raising Small Animals, chapter 10, Farming Press Books, UK, 1991.

C. Rizzi, G. M. Chiericato, and A. Dalle, “Reproductive and physiological responses of rabbit does under different nutritive levels before the first parturition,” in Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress, pp. 437–441, Verona, Italy, June 2008.

N. C. Jain, Schalm's Veterinary Hematology, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 4th edition, 1986.

R. J. Whitley, A. W. Meikle, and N. B. Watts, Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, chapter 35, W. B. Sounders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2nd edition, 1994.

B. Doumas and H. Biggs, Standard Method of Clinical Chemistry, vol. 7, Academic press, New York, NY, USA, 1972.

S. M. Woodall, B. H. Breier, B. M. Johnston, and P. D. Gluckman, “A model of intrauterine growth retardation caused by chronic maternal undernutrition in the rat: effects on the somatotrophic axis and postnatal growth,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 231–242, 1996.

K. Serizawa, Y. Mizoguchi, and T. Matsuoka, “Effects of stage and degree of restricted feeding on pregnancy outcome in rabbits,” Journal of Toxicological Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 69–75, 2006.

K. M. Rasmussen, “Effects of under- and overnutrition on lactation in laboratory rats,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 390–393, 1998.

J. A. Petrere, W. R. Rohn, and L. E. Grantham, “Food restriction during organogenesis in rabbits: effects on reproduction and the offspring,” Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 517–522, 1993.

J. M. Rommers, R. Meijerhof, J. P. T. M. Noordhuizen, and B. Kemp, “The effect of level of feeding in early gestation on reproductive success in young rabbit does,” Animal Reproduction Science, vol. 81, no. 1-2, pp. 151–158, 2004.

P. Coudert and F. Lebas, “Coudert and lebas, production et morbidité de lapines reproductrices. Part I. Effects du rationnement alimentaire avant et pendant la première gestation,” Annales de Zootechnie, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 1985.

C. M. Young and K. M. Rasmussen, “Effects of varying degrees of chronic dietary restriction in rat dams on reproductive and lactational performance and body composition in dams and their pups,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 979–987, 1985.

J. M. Rommers, Strategies for rearing of rabbit does, Dissertation thesis, Wageningen University, 2003, no. 3486 21.

G. D. Cappon, T. L. Fleeman, R. E. Chapin, and M. E. Hurtt, “Effects of feed restriction during organogenesis on embryo-fetal development in rabbit,” Birth Defects Research Part B, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 424–430, 2005.

L. Fortun-Lamothe and F. Lebas, “Influence of the number of suckling young and the feed level on fetal survival and growth in rabbit does,” Annales de Zootechnie, vol. 43, pp. 163–171, 1994.

L. Fortun-Lamothe, “Effects of pre-mating energy intake on reproductive performance of rabbit does,” Animal Science, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 263–269, 1998.

M. H. Vickers, B. H. Breier, D. McCarthy, and P. D. Gluckman, “Sedentary behavior during postnatal life is determined by the prenatal environment and exacerbated by postnatal hypercaloric nutrition,” American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 285, no. 1, pp. R271–R273, 2003.

K. M. Godfrey, “The role of the placenta in fetal programming,” Placenta, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. S20–S27, 2002.

I. Schulte and S. Hoy, “Untersuchungen zur saugeverhalten und zur mutter-kind abeziehung bei hauskaninchen,” Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, vol. 110, pp. 134–138, 1997.

F. Garsia-Ximenez and J. S. Vicente, “Propuesta de un criterio de valoracion de la capacidad uterine namerico en coneja,” ITEA Production Animal A, vol. 87, pp. 65–71, 1991.

T. Matsuoka, Y. Mizoguchi, K. Serizawa, T. Ishikura, H. Mizuguchi, and Y. Asano, “Effects of stage and degree of restricted feeding on pregnancy outcome in rabbits,” Journal of Toxicological Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 169–175, 2006.

Y. Nakanishi, J. Mori, and H. Nagasawa, “Recovery of pituitary secretion of gonadotrophins and prolactin during refeeding after chronic restricted feeding in female rats,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 329–339, 1976.

C. J. McManus and B. P. Fitzgerald, “Effects of a single day of feed restriction on changes in serum leptin, gonadotropins, prolactin, and metabolites in aged and young mares,” Domestic Animal Endocrinology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2000.

J. M. Rommers, C. Boiti, G. Brecchia, R. Meijerhof, J. P. T. M. Noordhuizen, E. Decuypere, and B. Kemp, “Metabolic adaptation and hormonal regulation in young rabbit does during long-term caloric restriction and subsequent compensatory growth,” Animal Science, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 255–264, 2007.

T. Matsuzawa, M. Nakata, I. Goto, and M. Tsushima, “Dietary deprivation induces fetal loss and abortion in rabbits,” Toxicology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 255–259, 1981.