The 402–405 MHz medical implant communication service (MICS) band has recently been allocated by the US Federal Communication Commission (FCC) with the potential to replace the low-frequency inductive coupling techniques in implantable devices. This band was particularly chosen to provide full-integration, low-power, faster data transfer, and longer communication range. This paper investigates the design of a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) that will be an essential building block of such wireless implantable devices operating in the MICS service band. Three different integrated quadrature VCOs that meet the requirements of the MICS standard are designed in 0.18 μm TSMC CMOS process to propose an optimum choice. Their performances in terms of power consumption, die area, linearity, and phase noise are compared. The fabricated VCOs are a four-stage differential ring VCO, an LC tank VCO directly loaded with a poly-phase filter, and an 800 MHz LC tank VCO with a high-frequency master-slave divider. All three architectures target a VCO gain of Kvco = 15 MHz/V with 3 calibration control and 2 frequency-shift keying (FSK) control signals and are designed for 1.5 V supply voltage in a 0.18-μm standard CMOS process.
1. Introduction
Design of implantable miniature
devices to be able to record or to transmit real-time physiologic parameters
(e.g., ECG, EEG, EOG, EMG, Neural, Blood Flow, Blood Pressure, etc.) from a
patient body in medical
environments is
becoming very important research area. FCC has recently allocated a new band at
402–405 MHz with 300 kHz channels to enable the wireless communication of such implantable devices to deliver high level of comfort, mobility, and better patient care [1]. In
addition to medical implants, metrological aids service has primary allocation
at 402–405 MHz band and
the Earth exploration-satellite service together with metrological-satellite
service has secondary allocation at 402-403 MHz [2]. With
the advance of radio frequency IC (RFIC) technology, this frequency band
promises high-level integration (compared to inductive link
designs) which results in miniaturization and low-power consumption. In
addition, there exist relatively insignificant penetration loss at these
frequencies (10 dB with 10 mm tissue penetration) [3] and is therefore very
suitable for the above applications. Although higher frequency causes higher
penetration loss, high-level integration becomes difficult at low frequencies.
Moreover, a small antenna design is also difficult at lower
frequencies [4].
Combining all these with the availability of the 402-403 MHZ band
internationally, this frequency band offers an attractive choice for future
medical implant devices [5].
Low power consumption and full
integration are the most critical targets for implantable transceivers.
Recently, some low-power CMOS transceivers, working at 433 MHz and 435 MHz
bands, have been reported [6–8]. These designs achieve low-power operation,
leaving the matching networks or voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) tank
inductor off-chip. As the size of an implantable transceiver is required to be
low, the VCOs presented in this paper are designed as fully integrated. A
direct conversion frequency-shift-keyed (FSK) transceiver shown in Figure 1 is
selected for a low-power implantation because of the simple demodulation
process of FSK signals when used with an I/Q direct conversion architecture [5, 9].
The system in Figure 1 is based on a
half full-duplex communication system, namely, it does not receive and transmit
at the same time. In the receive mode, the VCO is in the PLL loop. In the transmit mode of the
architecture, the PLL loop opens and the base-band digital data directly
modulate the VCO with an offset tone of ±Δf=70 kHz fitting
optimally into one of ten 300 kHz channels. The technique can easily be used for other modulation
schemes as well (e.g., AM/FM/PM, etc.). Herein, we are mainly interested in the
direct modulation of VCOs for FSK signals because of the relaxed bandwidth
requirements per channel (20 kb/s maximum data rate). When the input to the
VCOs is analog data, then an FM modulated signal will be generated [10]. The detailed specifications of the
proposed architecture were discussed in [11].
Block diagram of an MICS
transceiver. The shadow area shows the transmitter part.
The rest of the paper is organized as
follows. Section 2 discusses the details of the phase-locked loop (PLL)
architecture for an MICS transceiver. In Section 3, the design including a
402 MHz VCO directly loaded with a single-stage poly phase filter is presented.
In Section 4, the performance of an 800 MHz VCO followed by a high frequency
master-slave divider is discussed. Section 5 presents a four-stage differential
ring VCO as a very low-power candidate for the implantable devices in the MICS
band. Section 6 is the conclusion that does a performance comparison of the
three different architectures targeting the same specifications with a minimal
power.
2. Pll Architecture
The
block diagram of the target PLL architecture for this application is shown in
Figure 2(a). A choice of fractional-N PLL with 128/129 division ratio is
considered with a reference oscillator of ~3.14 MHz. With this selection, the whole
3-MHz MICS band (420–405 MHz) is covered. All of the VCOs designed here employ
direct modulation, where the base-band data arrange the frequency tones of FSK
signals in the transmit mode.
To utilize a precise reference frequency,
crystal oscillators are generally used, but they increase the package size. We
are investigating alternate methods such as using an on-chip temperature
compensated relaxation oscillator. The main reason for choosing the proposed
architecture in Figure 2(a) is to have an on-chip temperature compensated
relaxation oscillator to generate the frequency reference instead of a bulky
off-chip crystal. Some designs reported in the literature have successfully
demonstrated sub-100 ppm accuracy across temperature and supply variations
[12, 13]. Such an integrated device would inevitably contribute substantial
phase noise. Direct open loop modulation of the VCO in the transmit mode and
very low loop bandwidth PLL can alleviate this problem.
PLL architecture, (a) block diagram for the PLL with calibration, (b) down
conversion of the adjacent channel by the phase noise.
In
order to minimize the center frequency variations in the transmit mode, the VCO
gain is kept very low. This
reduces the susceptibility of the oscillation frequency to the noise on the
control voltage. However, having a narrow tuning range might leave the
VCO frequency range out of the desired band, considering the effect of process
variations. To prevent this to happen, a second static calibration loop is
utilized to maintain the VCO frequency in the desired range. Two comparators
track the control voltage and step the VCO frequency up or down with three-bit
resolution, in case the control voltage exceeds the predefined limits. Total of 8 overlapping frequency clusters provides
large enough overall tuning range while still keeping the VCO gain very low in
every cluster. Overlapping regions between the clusters
should be kept large enough to prevent unstable switching among the clusters
due to noise and temperature variations.
Moreover, by setting the thresholds of these comparators properly, the
VCO is easily kept in the linear regions of its total tuning range.
Unlike the other mobile communication
circuits, the phase noise requirement of a VCO for the targeted application
(i.e., MICS regulation) is not stringent due to the low regulated power and
short communication distance [5]. Because of the fixed distance and upper
bound on EIRP (equivalent isotropically radiated power), the dynamic range is
not too high (set by the path loss in 2 m, ~30 dB [11]). For this reason, the
down conversion of the noise in the adjacent channel due to the phase noise of
the oscillator is not very detrimental (except strong outside interferers).
Assuming a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 10 dB due to the next channel, the phase noise
requirement of the VCO can be driven with the help of Figure 2(b) as [14] L(160kHz)=−30−10−10log20000=−83dBc/Hz, where
the transmission data rate is selected 20 kb/s to cover the majority of
physiological signals [3, 8, 11]. All of the different VCOs presented in the
following sections were designed for the same specifications described so far,
targeting the minimum power consumption with 3-bit calibration control (~15
MHz/V VCO gain in every cluster) and 2-bit FSK control (±Δf=70 kHz to 80
kHz). They are followed by the same two-stage single-ended power amplifier
carefully sized to deliver around −7 dBm power to a 50-Ω antenna with an
integrated 13.9-nH RF-choke spiral inductor and 9-pF by-pass capacitors (MIM).
This output stage consumes 2.2 mA current from a 1.5 V supply.
3. A 400 MHz LC Tank VCO Directly Loaded with a Poly-Phase Filter
In this section, the circuit design parameters and
the measurement results of a poly-phase filter loaded 400 MHz LC tank
VCO are discussed.
3.1. Circuit Design
As
shown in Figure 3(b), a topology that uses nMOS-pMOS cross-coupled pairs with pMOS tail current source was chosen for the core VCO design. Using
both nMOS and pMOS pair gives double amplification for a given current. In
addition, this circuit can be optimized to have more symmetry in the output
waveform leading to a further phase noise reduction [15]. Due to its lower
flicker noise pMOS transistor was used as a tail current source.
(a) Basic LC-tank oscillator configuration with tank
parasitics, (b) schematic of a VCO directly loaded with poly-phase filter.
For
a given process and VCO topology, enlarging the oscillation amplitude is a very
efficient way of reducing the phase noise [16]. For a given current level, this
can be achieved by maximizing the values of the resonant tank inductors [17].
However, there are some serious limitations on the value of the inductor if the
inductor is to be integrated in a CMOS process. As the value of the inductance
in a spiral inductor increases, the resistive losses associated with it would
degrade the Q of this inductor, which is the most important phase noise source
in a fully integrated VCO. Thus, it is desirable to construct large inductors
with very low resistive losses [16]. An 8-turn 22.4 nH spiral inductor with a
trace width of w=12μm and gap of s=1.5μm is used for this design. Only
the top metal layer (metal6) was used for the spirals which would result in a
total series resistance of Rind=20Ω at 400 MHz. The quality factor of
this inductor at 400 MHz is 5.2. The total tank capacitance corresponding to
this inductance value is Ctot=7.07 pF. This total capacitance represents all the parasitic capacitances associated
with the FETs, capacitive loading due to poly-phase filter, 3-bit binary
weighted MIM-Caps for calibration, and varactor diodes for tuning. Moreover,
two switchable 7-fF metal2-metal3 capacitors were used for FSK modulation.
The
basic configuration for an LC tank oscillator is given in Figure 3(a) [16]. To
satisfy the oscillation condition, the transconductance necessary to have the
unity loop gain at the oscillation frequency, ωo, can be calculated from the
transfer function as [16] GM=Reff(ωoC)2, where Reff=RC+RL+1/(RP(ωoC)2). RP is the parallel tank
resistance, RL is the
inductor series resistance, and RC is the varactor series resistance. The most important term in determining the
value of Reff is the
series resistance of the inductor at 400 MHz, which is approximately 20
Ω
Using (1), the transconductance required to compensate the losses can be
calculated as GM=20Ω⋅(2π⋅0.4GHz⋅7.07pF)2=6.5mS. Therefore, each
transistor should have a gm of 6.5 mS. Thus, with a safety factor of 3, the
design assumes 20-mS transconductance
for each device. Current required to achieve the given transconductance value
with an over-drive voltage of VGS−VT=0.12V would be ID=gm(VGS−VT)/2≅1mA. Hence, the total tail current of VCO core is
set to be 2 mA from a 1.5-V supply during the simulations. The corresponding
transistor W/L ratios are 100μm/0.18μm for nMOS pair transistors and three times
bigger for the pMOS pair devices.
Using
a poly-phase filter to generate quadrature phases is a popular approach for low
power, I-Q mismatch tolerant applications [18, 19]. In general, these filters
have low input impedance and require power hungry buffers to drive them after the
VCO. They might also require buffers following them to drive the mixers (Figure 1). These buffers isolate the mixer input capacitance from the filter and also
provide the signal swing required for the mixer.
For
this specific application, taking advantage of relatively low operating
frequency, both buffers have been removed and the VCO is directly loaded with a
single-stage poly-phase filter as shown in Figure 3(b) (only single stage is used
to limit the filter loss). Rfil and
Cfil were chosen very carefully to maximize the filter input
impedance while keeping capacitance value large enough compared to total
parasitic capacitance in order not to deteriorate the I-Q mismatch. The total
input capacitance of mixer and power amplifier driver together with the parasitic
capacitance of the poly-resistors to substrate is around 38 fF in this design.
Thus, Cfil was chosen to be 132.7 Ff (four times bigger than total
parasitic capacitance) which would lead to a resistor value of Rfil=3 kΩ. The filter impedance for these
values can be reflected to the VCO as parallel combination of Rp=Rfil(Q2+1)/2≅3kΩ and Cp=2⋅Cfil((Q2)/(Q2+1))=132fF [19]. This 3 kΩ resistor value is 6 times larger than the total effective parallel tank
resistance (dominated by inductor series resistance Rind) Rptot=Rind(Q2+1)≅20Ω⋅25=500Ω.
Thus, the loading due to the filter impedance is negligible. The capacitive
part of the filter impedance is absorbed into the total tank capacitance to
generate 400 MHz center frequency.
3.2. Measurement Results
The
design has been fabricated in 0.18μm TSMC CMOS process. The total die area
including the bonding pads, a fully integrated power amplifier with the RF
choke coil, and the by-pass capacitors is 1.2 mm × 1.2 mm (Figure 4). LLP-40
leadless 40-pin RF package is used for the measurements. The oscillator can
sustain the oscillation with a current as low as 800μA. The detailed spectrum
measurements were done with a core supply current of 1.25 mA, leaving some
safety margin. The measured spectrum and the tuning characteristics are shown
in Figure 5. The desired tuning characteristics were obtained with a total tuning
range of 90 MHz spread into 3-bit controlled 8 clusters. The VCO gain inside
every cluster is around 15 MHz/V as expected.
Although the most significant bit (MSB) of the calibration input causes
a larger step in the tuning range, a safe overlap can still be observed. The
FSK control bits caused 60-kHz tones around the center frequency. Although this
tone frequency still can be employed with FSK, this value can easily be tuned
to the desired 70-kHz tone in the next iteration of the design by modifying the
FSK capacitors. The phase noise measurement is done with Agilent E5052A. The
phase noise at an offset of 160 kHz is −98 dBc/Hz, which is far below the
prerequisite value for the application. The phase noise plot is shown in
Figure 6(a). Figure 6(b) shows the phase noise values at the offsets of interest for
various power levels.
The microphotograph of
the VCO directly loaded with a poly-phase filter and a two-stage power
amplifier.
(a) The measured spectrum of the VCO with
poly-phase filter, (b) the measured tuning characteristics of this VCO.
(a) The measured phase noise of the
VCO with poly-phase filter, (b) phase noise for various VCO core
current levels.
4. An 800 MHz LC Tank VCO with a Master-Slave Divider
Another way to
generate quadrature signals is to use a master-slave divide-by-2 circuit
following a VCO operating at double frequency. In this section, the performance
of an 800 MHz LC tank VCO with an analog master-slave divider is discussed. The
divider outputs drive the same mixer and power amplifier load as in the case of
first design (as shown in Figure 1).
4.1. Circuit Design
Since
the fast analog D-flip-flops of the divider circuit needs to be driven with
high swing inputs, a VCO topology with only nMOS cross-coupled pair is used to
have a higher swing at the oscillator output. The circuit schematic of the
design including the divider is shown in Figure 7. Two 13.69-nH spiral inductors
with 7 turns are used for this 800-MHz LC tank. The top metal (metal6) with
conductor width w=9μm and conductor
spacing s=1.5μm yields an effective
series resistance of 13 Ω. Q factor for this inductor is around 4.2
at the frequency of 800 MHz. The total of 2.89 pF tank capacitance includes
varactor diode capacitances, 3-bit binary weighted switchable MIM-caps,
parasitic gate-source, and drain-source capacitances of the cross coupled nMOS
pair and the parasitic input gate capacitance of the divider circuit. Two 5-fF
metal2-meatl3 capacitances are used for direct FSK modulation by the base-band
binary data. The total effective series resistance of the tank was estimated to
be 16 Ω with an additional up to 3-Ω varactor series resistance. Again using
(2), the overall required transconductance is calculated to be 3.36 mS.
Assuming a safety factor of 3, each nMOS device of the cross-coupled pair
should have a gm of around 20 mS to
sustain reliable oscillation. This transconductance value can be obtained by
having 1 mA current through each branch with 120 mV overdrive voltage across
100μm width minimum channel length nMOS devices. A current source pMOS device
of 400μm channel width and 0.3μm channel length can support this 2-mA total
current with an overdrive voltage of 140 mV.
The schematic for 800 MHz VCO with master-slave divider.
A very common topology shown in Figure 7 was
used for fast divide-by-2 operation. In this design, M3 and M4 would not allow
a large voltage drop at the drains of M1 and M2, which otherwise would push M11
into triode region in case of a large VCO output driving this stage,
particularly in the case of a low supply voltage. Transistors were carefully
sized to achieve successful division using a 1.5-V supply with minimum power
consumption. The divider circuit can directly drive the mixers and the PA
consuming 400μA from a 1.5-V supply [20].
4.2. Measurement Results
The
design has been fabricated in 0.18μm TSMC CMOS process. The total die area
including the bonding pads, a fully integrated power amplifier with the RF
choke coil and the by-pass capacitors is 1.1 mm × 1.2 mm (Figure 8). The VCO core
and the divider circuit consume 2.2 mA from a 1.5-V supply. The measured tuning
characteristic of the design is shown in Figure 9. The desired tuning
characteristics were obtained with a total tuning range of 70 MHz spread into
3-bit controlled 8 clusters. The linear tuning region of this VCO is much less
compared to linear tuning range of the 400 MHz design. However, due to large overlapping
margins across the clusters, the comparator thresholds can be set accordingly
to keep the VCO in the linear part of the tuning curve as shown in Figure 9. The
VCO gain inside every cluster is around 17 MHz/V. The FSK control bits in this case caused
120-kHz tones around the center frequency. The measured spectrum and the phase
noise plot are shown in Figure 10. The phase noise at an offset of 160 kHz is
−97.7 dBc/Hz, a value which is very close to the −98 dBc/Hz value obtained from
the previous design.
The microphotograph of the chip including an 800 MHz LC tank VCO with dividers and a four-stage
differential ring VCO.
The tuning characteristic of 800 MHz oscillator followed by a divider.
(a) The measured spectrum, (b) the phase noise of 800 MHz oscillator followed by a divider.
5. A Four-Stage Differential Ring VCO
Since
the phase noise requirement of the application is relatively relaxed, the
performance of a four-stage differential ring VCO is evaluated as a low power
alternative to LC tank VCOs. There is no extra step to generate the quadrature
outputs in the case of this four-stage ring VCO. The area of the design, most of which is
occupied by the on-chip inductor of the PA, is considerably less compared to
the LC tank VCOs (Figure 9). The same PA and mixer loads as in the case of LC
tank designs are driven by the differential buffers following the Ring
VCO.
5.1. Circuit Design
Ring
oscillators are generally avoided in communication circuit applications due to
their poor phase noise and linearity performance relative to LC tank
oscillators. However, some researchers have investigated the ways to improve
the phase noise and linearity of the ring VCOs [21, 22]. The noise transfer
function can be calculated using a linear model for the oscillator. In the
paper, these calculations were supported with the measurements in order to
predict the thermal noise contributions of the delay elements accurately. A
four-stage differential VCO was optimized to achieve the desired tuning and FSK
modulation characteristics satisfying the phase noise requirement (−83 dBc/Hz at
160 kHz offset). The schematic of the design including an individual delay
element is shown in Figure 11. Every delay cell in this VCO gets three bit
calibration control and two bit FSK control signals. These two bit FSK data turn
long channel devices M11 and M12 on and off, causing the total sink current
change in slight amounts such that frequency deviations will be around 80 kHz.
The delay cell topology proposed in [22] is modified to have additional
calibration and FSK control. This topology is particularly suitable for the
application due to two main reasons. First, one can obtain a very low VCO gain, Kvco, by properly sizing the devices
M5 and M6 relative to the devices M3 and M4. Second, the tuning devices M5 and
M6 would stay in saturation even for very small control voltage levels. Using
Barkhausen oscillation criteria, oscillation frequency for an n-stage ring
oscillator can be written down as [21, 22] ωo=1RCtan(πn), where, R and C are the resistance and capacitance, respectively, at the output
node of individual delay cells. For this design the output impedance is
dominated by 1/gm3,4. Since the devices M3 and M4 are mostly in
saturation, the relation between the control voltage and the oscillation frequency
can be written down as ωo=gm3,4C=2μnCoxW3,4C2l3,4×(Is2−μnCoxW5,62l5,6(Vdd−Vctr)2). Although not
perfectly linear, monotonic, and linear-like characteristic can be maintained
over the full useful tuning range due to low supply voltage.
The schematic of the four-stage differential ring VCO.
The circuit was
optimized in simulations to obtain −82 dBc/Hz phase noise at a 160 kHz offset. Spectre was used for phase noise
optimization. The simulated current consumption of the VCO core including the
differential buffers was 700μA from a 1.5-V supply.
5.2. Measurement Results
The
design was laid out on the upper left corner of the 800-MHz LC tank VCO die (Figure 8). The same inductively loaded two-stage PA
follows the buffers isolating the delay cells. The measured spectrum and the
tuning characteristic of the ring VCO are shown in Figure 12. Very fine
distributed overlapping tuning clusters were obtained as predicted. The
linearity of this ring VCO even outperforms the linearity of its LC tank
counterparts. A very serious drawback of this ring VCO was the excessively high
susceptibility of the oscillating frequency to the noise in the supply and
control lines. Although an average frequency deviation of ±Δf≅120kHz observed with FSK control, this drawback
associated with this ring VCO should be addressed in order to be able to
observe accurate 70 kHz FSK tones.
(a) The tuning characteristic, (b) the measured spectrum of the four-stage differential ring VCO.
The phase noise at 160 kHz offset is −77
dBc/Hz, which is extracted by looking at the power from the measured spectrum
at this offset and subtracting the resolution bandwidth. The measured current
consumption was 738μA from a 1.5-V supply.
6. Comparison and Conclusion
Three
different fully integrated VCOs including the driving buffers and the power
amplifiers were designed, and fabricated in 0.18μm TSMC CMOS process to
evaluate the best option for an MICS band transceiver operating at the new
402–405 MHz band. Although it consumes very low power and occupies very small
die area, the poor frequency stability of ring VCO makes it difficult to obtain
a reasonable FSK tone for 300 kHz channel spacing in MICS band. Moreover, the
measured phase noise was 5 dB more than the predefined maximum level. The 800
MHz LC tank VCO with master-slave divider achieves almost the same phase noise
performance at the expense of almost double power consumption, compared to the
400 MHz LC tank VCO directly loaded with poly-phase filter. The linearity of
the tuning curve of 800 MHz design is worse than the 400 MHz one. The
measurement results of these three architectures were summarized in a
comparison table (Table 1). In conclusion, a carefully designed 400 MHz LC
tank driving a poly-phase filter was proven to be the best option for this
application.
Comparison table for the three oscillator architectures.
VCO type
Current consumption
Die area
Phase noise @ 160 kHz offset
Linearity
Frequency stability
Supply noise sensitivity
Ring
0.74 mA
0.2 mm × 0.2 mm
−77 dBc/Hz
Good
Poor
Sensitive
LC-tank divided
2.20 mA
0.4 mm × 0.7 mm
−97 dBc/Hz
Moderate
Good
Immune
LC-tank with PF
1.25 mA
0.6 mm × 0.8 mm
−98
dBc/Hz
Moderate
Good
Immune
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Masood Yousefi, Ali Kiaei, Bijoy G
Chatterjee, Ahmad Bahai, Raj Subramoniam, and Virginia Abellera of National
Semiconductor for their support and collaboration in the project. M. Yuce’s
work is supported by the Australian ARC discovery Grant no. DP0772929.
FCC Rules and RegulationsMICS Band PlanTable of Frequency Allocations, Part 95, January 2003Australian Communications Authority, Radio Frequency Planning GroupPlanning for Medical Implant Communications Systems & Related DevicesProposals Paper, October 2003, http://www.acma.gov.auScanlonW. G.w.scanlon@ulst.ac.ukBurnsJ. B.EvansN. E.Radiowave propagation from a tissue-implanted source at 418 MHz and 916.5 MHz200047452753410.1109/10.828152SkrivervikA. K.ZurcherJ.-F.StaubO.MosigJ. R.PCS antenna design: the challenge of miniaturization2001434122710.1109/74.951556BradleyP.An ultra low power, high performance medical implant communication system (MICS) transceiver for implantable devicesProceedings of the IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS '06)November -December, 2006London, UKMellyT.PorretA.-S.EnzC. C.VittozE. A.An ultralow-power UHF transceiver integrated in a standard digital CMOS process: transmitter200136346747210.1109/4.910485ZencirE.HuangT.-H.TekinA.DoganN. S.ArvasE.UHF RF front-end circuits in 0.35-μm silicon on insulator (SOI) CMOS200545323124510.1007/s10470-005-4953-zNeihartN. M.HarrisonR. R.harrison@ece.utah.eduMicropower circuits for bidirectional wireless telemetry in neural recording applications200552111950195910.1109/TBME.2005.856247PorretA.-S.MellyT.PythonD.EnzC. C.VittozE. A.An ultralow-power UHF transceiver integrated in a standard digital CMOS process:
architecture and receiver200136345246610.1109/4.910484ChoiY. B.TeoT. H.YeohW. G.A 2.4 GHz fully integrated CMOS VCO with direct FM/FSK modulation capabilityProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Electron Devices and Solid-State Circuits (EDSSC '03)December 2003Hong Kong17517810.1109/EDSSC.2003.1283509TekinA.YuceM. R.mryuce@soe.ucsc.eduLiuW.A low power MICS band transceiver architecture for implantable devicesProceedings of the IEEE Annual Conference on Wireless and Microwave
Technology (WAMICON '05)April 2005Clearwater, Fla, USA555810.1109/WAMIC.2005.1528383NolanJ. B.EllisonR. S.Calibration techniques for a precision relaxation oscillator integrated circuit with
temperature compensationUS patent 299338, March 2002SplithofM. H.van TuijlA. J. M.GierkinkS. L. J.KlumperinkE. A. M.Current-ratio temperature compensation in bipolar relaxation oscillatorProceedings of the 24th European Solid-State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC '98)September 1998The Hague, The Netherlands392395RazaviB.1998Upper Saddle River, NJ, USAPrentice-HallBhattacharjeeJ.MukherjeeD.GebaraE.NuttinckS.LaskarJ.A 5.8 GHz fully integrated low power low phase noise CMOS LC VCO for WLAN applications1Proceedings of the IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium DigestJune 2002Seattle, Wash, USA58558810.1109/MWSYM.2002.1011688CraninckxJ.SteyaertM.1998Dordrecht, The NetherlandsKluwer Academic PublishersRazaviB.A 1.8 GHz CMOS voltage-controlled oscillatorProceedings of the 43rd IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC '97)February 1997San Francisco, Calif, USA38838910.1109/ISSCC.1997.585453BorremansM.SteyaertM.YoshitomiT.A 1.5 V, wide band 3 GHz, CMOS quadrature direct up-converter for multi-mode wireless communicationsProceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits ConferenceMay 1998Santa Clara, Calif, USA798210.1109/CICC.1998.694911BorremansM.De MuerB.SteyaertM.The optimization of GHz integrated CMOS quadrature VCO's based on a poly-phase filter loaded differential oscillator2Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS '00)May 2000Geneva, Switzerland72973210.1109/ISCAS.2000.856432ParkerJ. F.RayD.A 1.6-GHz CMOS PLL with on-chip loop filter199833333734310.1109/4.661199RazaviB.A study of phase noise in CMOS oscillators199631333134310.1109/4.494195ChenH.GeigerR.Transfer characterization of CMOS ring voltage controlled oscillators1Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS '01)August 2001Dayton, Ohio, USA667010.1109/MWSCAS.2001.986116