Leukemia Research and TreatmentVolume 2011 (2011), Article ID 592519, 3 pagesdoi:10.4061/2011/592519

Case Report

A Rare t(9;22;16)(q34;q11;q24) Translocation in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia for Which Imatinib Mesylate Was Effective: A Case Report

Masahiro Manabe,1,2 Yumi Yoshii,¹ Satoru Mukai,¹ Erina Sakamoto,¹ Hiroshi Kanashima,¹ Takeshi Inoue,³ and Hirofumi Teshima¹

¹Department of Hematology, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojimahondori, Miyakojima-Ku, Osaka 534-0021, Japan²Department of Hematology, Osaka City University Medical School, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abeno-Ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan³Department of Pathology, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojimahondori, Miyakojima-Ku, Osaka 534-0021, Japan

Received 15 February 2011; Revised 20 April 2011; Accepted 15 May 2011

Academic Editor: Daniela Cilloni

Copyright © 2011 Masahiro Manabe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The t(9;22)(q34;q11) translocation is found in about 90% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. About 5–10% of CML patients have complex variant translocations involving a third chromosome in addition to chromosomes 9 and 22. Herein, we describe a CML-chronic phase male with a complex translocation involving chromosome 16, t(9;22;16)(q34;q11;q24). First, he was treated with interferon-alpha and intermittent hydroxyurea, but only a partial cytogenetic response was attained. Subsequently, the patient was treated with imatinib mesylate because of an additional chromosome abnormality, trisomy 8. A major molecular response was obtained after one year's imatinib therapy, and the follow-up chromosomal analysis performed 4 years and 3 months after the initiation of imatinib therapy displayed a normal karyotype of 46,XY.

1. Introduction

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the t(9;22)(q34;q11) translocation, in which the BCR gene at 22q11 is fused to the ABL gene at 9q34. The BCR/ABL fusion gene is thought to play a role in the leukemogenesis of CML and is a target of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as imatinib mesylate.

About 5–10% of CML patients have complex variant translocations involving a third chromosome in addition to chromosomes 9 and 22. All chromosomes have been reported to act as the third chromosome, but breakpoint clustering at 1p36, 3p21, 5q13, 6p21, 9q22, 11q13, 12p13, 17p13, 17q21, 17q25, 19q13, 21q22, 22q12, and 22q13 has been reported [1, 2]. On the other hand, only a few cases involving chromosome 16 have been reported. Herein, we describe a CML-chronic phase male with a complex translocation involving chromosome 16, t(9;22;16)(q34;q11;q24), for which imatinib mesylate was effective, even after a new subclone, +8, appeared.

2. Case Report

A 55-year-old man was referred to us in November 2000 because of leukocytosis. No lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly was detected. Peripheral blood analysis showed a white blood cell count of /L with 1% blasts, 0.5% promyelocytes, 5.5% myelocytes, 1% metamyelocytes, 64% neutrophils, 8% lymphocytes, 2% monocytes, 3.5% eosinophils, and 14.5% basophils. His hemoglobin level was 14.6 g/dL, and his platelet count was /L. His serum level of lactate dehydrogenase was 423 U/L (reference range, 106–211 U/L). Bone marrow aspiration revealed less than 5% blasts, and karyotype analysis of his bone marrow cells showed the following karyotype: 46,XY,t(9;22;16)(q34;q11;q24) [20] (Figure 1(a)). In addition, fluorescent in situ hybridization showed BCR/ABL fusion signals in 92.2% cells, as shown in Figure 1(b). A diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (chronic phase) was made. In addition, his prognostic Sokal score indicated that he was an intermediate-risk patient. He was treated with interferon-alpha and intermittent hydroxyurea from December 2000, and he achieved a partial cytogenetic response in February 2002: FISH showed fusion signals in 5.6% cells. However, cytogenetic surveillance on a quarterly basis confirmed that only a partial cytogenetic response had been attained, and a complete cytogenetic response was not achieved at any point during his treatment with this combination therapy. We proposed switching from interferon-based medication to imatinib mesylate, but he did not give his consent for this due to his economic situation. Follow-up cytogenetic analysis in November 2006 revealed the following additional abnormal karyotype: 46,XY,t(9;22;16)(q34;q11;q24) [3]/47,idem,+8 [2]/46,XY [4]. As shown in Figure 2, the complex translocation found by multicolor-FISH was consistent with the results of the G-banding analysis. Therefore, the patient was started on imatinib mesylate therapy (400 mg/day) and rapidly achieved a complete cytogenetic response (by January 2007). A major molecular response, estimated by the method described previously [3], was obtained after one year's imatinib therapy. The latest chromosomal analysis, which was performed 4 years and 3 months after the initiation of imatinib therapy, displayed a karyotype of 46,XY [20]. He still continues to display a major molecular response and is currently receiving imatinib therapy and undergoing quarterly cytogenetic evaluations.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: (a) G-band karyotype analysis performed at diagnosis revealed the following karyotype: 46,XY,t(9;22;16)(q34;q11;q24). (b) Dual-color FISH analysis performed using a BCR/ABL-specific probe (LSI BCR/ABL Dual-Color single translocation probe, Vysis, IL, US) demonstrated the presence of fusion signals (white arrow) in CML cells.

Figure 2: Multicolor FISH image (pseudocolor labeled) of metaphase spreads after spectrum-based classification.

3. Discussion

The t(9;22)(q34;q22) translocation is a characteristic chromosomal abnormality of CML, and in 5–10% cases, the BCR/ABL fusion gene is produced by a complex translocation. Several hundred CML cases with variant translocations have been reported, and the distribution of the breakpoints is clearly clustered around particular chromosomal bands such as 1p36, 3p21, 5q13, 6p21, 9q22, 11q13, 12p13, 17p13, 17q21, 17q25, 19q13, 21q22, 22q12, and 22q13 [1, 2]. To the best of our knowledge, chromosome 16 has only been reported to be involved in t(9;22)(q34;q22) variants in about ten cases [5–15]. However, most of these reports mainly focused on the chromosomal abnormality itself, and only a few reports mentioned the response to imatinib therapy; one showed hematological remission, three cases attained a complete cytogenetic response [8, 11, 15], and another case was not available. Although our case displayed a clonal chromosome abnormality (+8) in Ph+ cells at the start of the imatinib therapy, a major molecular response was achieved. Concerning the therapeutic response, in the preimatinib era, shorter survival was observed in variant Ph patients than in those with the classical Ph translocation, as deletions of the derivative chromosome 9 were found to occur at a much higher frequency in patients with variant translocations than in those with the classical t(9;22)(q34;q22) translocation [9]. However, it has been reported that patients harboring variant translocations have similar prognoses to those with classical t(9;22)(q34;q22) when treated with imatinib [14, 15]. On the other hand, although it was based on a small series of cases, it was reported that patients harboring complex variant translocations at diagnosis exhibit a poor clinical outcome because of their relative genomic instability compared to classical t(9;22) patients without variant translocations [4]. Hence, it seems that the prognostic impact of variant translocations has not been fully elucidated. In the present case, even after a new subclone, +8, had appeared, imatinib mesylate treatment achieved ample success. We think that further elucidation of the therapeutic outcome of imatinib therapy in CML cases involving variant translocations, including clonal evolution, is necessary.

References

B. Johansson, T. Fioretos, and F. Mitelman, “Cytogenetic and molecular genetic evolution of chronic myeloid leukemia,” Acta Haematologica, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 76–94, 2002.

F. Mitelman, B. Johansson, and F. Mertens, Eds., “Mitelman database of chromosome aberrations in cancer,” February 2011, http://www.cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman.

M. Sumi, T. Tauchi, G. Sashida, N. Shoji, A. Gotoh, Y. Itoh, K. Miyazawa, Y. Kimura, J. H. Ohyashiki, and K. Ohyashiki, “Clinical usefulness of transcription-mediated amplification and hybridization protection assay in imatinib-treated chronic myelogenous leukemia patients,” Clinical and Laboratory Haematology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 416–417, 2005.

F. Stagno, P. Vigneri, V. D. Fabro, S. Stella, A. Cupri, M. Massimino, C. Consoli, L. Tambè, M. L. Consoli, A. Antolino, and F. Di Raimondo, “Influence of complex variant chromosomal translocations in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 506–508, 2010.

R. Bernstein, M. R. Pinto, and C. Wallace, “The incidence, type, and subsequent evolution of 14 variant Ph1 translocations in 180 South African patients with Ph1-positive chronic myeloid leukemia,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 225–238, 1984.

I. Dube, J. Dixon, T. Beckett, A. Grossman, M. Weinstein, P. Benn, T. McKeithan, C. Norman, and P. Pinkerton, “Location of breakpoint within the major breakpoint cluster region (bcr) in 33 patients with bcr rearrangement-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with complex or absent Philadelphia chromosomes,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 106–111, 1989.

T. Ishihara and M. Minamihisamatsu, “The Philadelphia chromosome. Considerations based on studies of variant Ph translocations,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 75–92, 1988.

J. P. M. Espinoza, V. J. P. Cárdenas, E. A. V. Jiménez, M. G. Angulo, M. A. E. Flores, and J. R. G. García, “A complex translocation (9;22;16)(q34;q11.2;p13) in chronic myelocytic leukemia,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 175–177, 2005.

A. G. Reid, B. J. P. Huntly, C. Grace, A. R. Green, and E. P. Nacheva, “Survival implications of molecular heterogeneity in variant Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 419–427, 2003.

A. Hagemeijer, C. R. Bartram, and E. M. E. Smit, “Is the chromosomal region 9q34 always involved in variants of the Ph1 translocation?” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1984.

S. Richebourg, V. Eclache, C. Perot, M. F. Portnoi, J. Van den Akker, C. Terré, O. Maareck, V. Soenen, F. Viguié, J. L. Laï, J. Andrieux, S. Corm, and C. Roche-Lestienne, “Mechanisms of genesis of variant translocation in chronic myeloid leukemia are not correlated with ABL1 or BCR deletion status or response to imatinib therapy,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 2008.

F. Morel, A. Herry, M. J. Le Bris, P. Morice, P. Bouquard, J. F. Abgrall, C. Berthou, and M. De Braekeleer, “Contribution of fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses to the characterization of masked and complex Philadelphia chromosome translocations in chronic myelocytic leukemia,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 115–120, 2003.

M. Gorusu, P. Benn, Z. Li, and M. Fang, “On the genesis and prognosis of variant translocations in chronic myeloid leukemia,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 97–106, 2007.

M. M. T. El-Zimaity, H. Kantarjian, M. Talpaz, S. O'Brien, F. Giles, G. Garcia-Manero, S. Verstovsek, D. Thomas, A. Ferrajoli, K. Hayes, B. Nebiyou Bekele, X. Zhou, M. B. Rios, A. B. Glassman, and J. E. Cortes, “Results of imatinib mesylate therapy in chronic myelogenous leukaemia with variant Philadelphia chromosome,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 187–195, 2004.

G. Marzocchi, F. Castagnetti, and S. Luatti, “Variant Philadelphia translocations: molecular-cytogenetic characterization and prognostic influence on frontline imatinib therapy, a GIMEMA Working Party on CML analysis,” Blood, vol. 117, no. 25, pp. 6793–6800, 2011.