ISRN Materials ScienceVolume 2011 (2011), Article ID 907493, 12 pagesdoi:10.5402/2011/907493

Research Article

A New Approach to Dyeing of 80 : 20 Polyester/Cotton Blended Fabric Using Disperse and Reactive Dyes

B. Muralidharan1,2 and S. Laya1,2

¹Department of Industrial Chemistry, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, TamilNadu 630003, India²Department of Chemistry, Birla Institute of Technology and Science-Pilani, Dubai Campus, Dubai International Academic City, P.O. Box 345055, Dubai, UAE

Received 9 April 2011; Accepted 3 May 2011

Academic Editor: P. de Lima-Neto

Copyright © 2011 B. Muralidharan and S. Laya. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Polyester/Cotton blended fabrics are normally dyed by two-bath or one-bath two-step dyeing method. This paper deals with a new approach involving azeotropic ternary mixture of organic solvents pretreatment to dye polyester/cotton blends using disperse and reactive dyes in one-bath method. The effect of solvent pretreatments on dyeability, fastness, and few physicochemical properties has been investigated involving SEM, FTIR, DSC, and XRD studies, and results are presented.

1. Introduction

Commercially polyester/cotton blended fabrics are dyed by two-bath or one-bath two-step dyeing method employing suitable dyes and chemicals for each fiber [1].

Two bath dyeing methods are relatively long and complicated. The one-bath two-step dyeing procedure is shorter as compared to two-bath method, but the drawbacks are lower dyeability and poor reproducibility [2–4]. Dyeing of cotton by conventional reactive dyes is carried out under alkaline conditions at 80°C, but this is entirely different condition from that of polyester dyeing, which is carried out at acidic conditions over 120°C by using dispersed dyes. Many research works have been carried out to dye polyester/cotton blends in one-bath dyeing method using conventional dispersed dyes and newly developed reactive dyes which can be dyed at acidic or neutral conditions around 100–130°C and are added simultaneously to the same bath [5–8].

Youssef et al. [9] have developed a dyeing method for polyester/cotton blend fabrics using sodium edetate as an alkaline buffering agent. Selected mono- and bifunctional reactive dyes were used in combination with the alkali stable disperse dyes for dyeing of polyester/cotton blend. One-bath method for dyeing of polyester/cotton blends with reactive disperse dyes using supercritical carbon dioxide as a solvent at 393 K and 20 MPa was successfully investigated by Shingo et al. [10]. A very recent research work reported by Najafi et al. [11] discussed the process of dyeing polyester/cotton fabrics using disperse/reactive dyestuff in one-bath dyeing process after coating the fabric with chitin biopolymer and then dyed with sulphato ethyl sulphonyl disperse/reactive dyes. Reports are available on the use of single solvent assisted dyeing of polyester and polyester/cotton blends [12–14]. Dystar Textilfarben GMBH & Co. has patented dyeing of polyester/cotton blends fabrics with disperse and reactive dyes in a one-bath process in alkaline medium using disperse dyes which are stable in alkaline medium [15].

The present work was undertaken to establish a new method for dyeing polyester/cotton blends by pretreating the fibre blend using nonaqueous azeotropic solvent mixture to get improved dyeing results. The term Azeotrope (Greek) means “to boil unchanged”, that is, the vapour boiling from a liquid has the same composition as the liquid. The composition of the ternary mixtures was fixed by referring to azeotropic data published by Ryland [16] and Lecat [17]. The polyester/cotton blend of 80 : 20 composition was treated with two different azeotropic solvent mixtures for various durations and their physical, structural, chemical, and dyeing behavior was analyzed.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials, Dyes, and Chemicals

80 : 20 polyester/cotton fabric (80 : 20 PCF):

A plain woven polyester/cotton fabric of the following specification was used.(i)Types of yarn-filament.(ii)Ends per inch-146.(iii)Picks per inch-82.

2.1.1. Dyes

The following four disperse dyes (Scheme 1) were used for dyeing the polyester component of the blend as supplied by the manufacturer (Parishi Chemicals, Surat, India) without further purification.

Scheme 1: (a) Foron Brilliant Red E-2BL200 F (C.I. Disperse Red 60); (b) Foron Brilliant Orange S-FL (C.I. Disperse Orange 96); (c) Foron Blue SE 2R (Disperse Blue183); (d) Foron Brilliant Yellow E-3GFL (C.I. Disperse Yellow 49).

The following four reactive dyes (Scheme 2) were used for dyeing the cotton component of the blend as supplied by the manufacturer (Ridhi Sidhi Trading Co., Mumbai, India) without further purification.

Scheme 2: (a) Drimarene Brilliant Red K-BL (C.I. Reactive Red 124); (b) Drimarene Brilliant Orange (C.I. Reactive Orange 64); (c) Drimarene Turquoise K-2B (C.I. Reactive Blue 116); (d) C.I. Reactive Yellow 14.

2.1.2. Chemicals

The details of Azeotropic mixtures of organic solvents used are shown in Table 1. Commercially available anionic wetting agent, dispersing agent, Glauber’s salt, sodium bicarbonate (to maintain the pH between 10 and 11), and borax as buffering agent were used in the dyebath. Ladipur MCL was used for reduction clearing of the fabric after dying. All chemicals used were Fischer-LR Grade.

Table 1: Details of azeotropic solvent mixture.

S. no
Solvent System
Weight %
Volume %
Solubility parameter
Polarity Index
B. P. (°C)

Acetone
24.3
30.6
10.0

1
Ethyl alcohol
10.4
13.2
12.7
14.5
63.2

Chloroform (Ac-EA-Cf)
65.3
44.0
9.3

Acetone
51.1
64.3
10.0

2
Methyl acetate
5.6
6.0
9.8
9.5
49.7

n-Hexane (Ac-MAc-nH)
43.3
66.1
7.3

2.1.3. Apparatus

Padding mangle was used to squeeze the pretreated fabric to aid the penetration of solvent mixture into the interior of the fibre samples. Dyeing was performed using the Rota-dyer bath (Rota dyer -N machine, R.B. Electronics & Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai-53, India).

2.1.4. Pretreatments

The above-said azeotropic mixtures (Table 1) were used as pretreater. The pretreatments were carried out at room temperature for various time intervals, namely, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, and 30 minutes. The pretreated fabrics were then squeezed in the padding mangle and then air dried for removal of residual solvent mixture. Then, the fabrics were subjected to dyeing.

2.1.5. Dyeing Recipe

(i)Disperse dye: 2%.(ii)Reactive dye: 2%.(iii)Glauber’s salt: 5 gpl.(iv)Soda ash: 3 gpl.(v)Borax: 5 gpl.(vi)pH of the dye bath: 10 to 11.(vii)MLR (material to liquor ratio) : 1 : 50.(viii)Temperature: 80, 95, and 110°C. (ix)Time: 30, 45, and 60 minutes.

The pretreated samples were introduced into the above-said dye bath and kept under these conditions for 10 minutes. Then, calculated amount of dye solution and chemicals were added into the dye bath and then required temperature was reached by increasing the bath temperature at a rate of 2°C/min. Dyeings were carried out for the above-mentioned durations. After the completion of the dyeing time, the temperature was brought down to room temperature gradually, then the dyed fabrics were taken out and washed with water. The fabrics after dyeing and washings were reduction cleared by using commercially available reduction clearing agent, Ladipur MCL (Clariant Chemicals, India). Then, it was washed with water at room temperature and then dried in a hot air oven.

2.2. Measurement of Dye Uptake

The amount of dye pickup of polyester/cotton fabrics during dyeing was determined spectrophotometrically using spectrophotometer (Labomed-model spectro 23 RS, USA).

2.3. Test for Colour Fastness

The untreated and solvent-pretreated 80 : 20 PCFs after dyeing were tested for their wash fastness, light fastness and rub fastness using AATCC test methods (AATCC technical manual 2000). The washing fastness, was evaluated by AATCC method 61(2A) using an Atlas-Launder Ometer. Fastness to light was evaluated by AATCC method 16E using an Atlas CI 3000 + Xenon Weatherometer. The fastness to rubbing was also evaluated as per AATCC 116-1995 standards using crock meter.

2.4. Determination of Weight Loss

The weight loss percentage of the treated fabrics was determined by measuring the weights before and after pretreatments using an electronic balance Sartorius-GD 503-Germany.

2.5. Abrasion Resistance

The abrasion resistance of the fabric samples after and before solvent treatment was measured by Martindale abrasion tester as per ASTM D4966 test method.

2.6. SEM Topography

Scanning electron microscopic studies were made on treated and untreated samples with S-3000H- Hitachi, Japan to study surface modifications if any caused by the solvent pretreatments using azeotropic mixtures. The samples were imaged with a magnification of 500x for better understanding of the inner core of the sample.

2.7. FTIR Analysis

Fourier Transform infrared spectral analysis of the treated and untreated fabrics was recorded in the range of 4000–400 cm⁻¹ using Perkin Elmer spectrometer (spectrum BX, USA) with built-in spectral matching computerized software. The fabric samples were made into individual fibers and were mounted onto the instrument for recording the spectrum.

2.8. Thermal Analysis

Thermal analysis of the untreated and solvent-mixture-pretreated 80 : 20 PCF was made using Perkin Elmer Pyris 6, USA at a temperature range of −50 to 400°C with a heating rate of 50°C/min under inert atmosphere of nitrogen gas at a rate of 20 mL/min [18].

2.9. X-ray Diffraction Studies

X-Ray diffraction studies using PANalytival-mode X’Pert PRO was carried out for both untreated and solvent-treated 80 : 20 PCFs for determining the crystalline and amorphous region of both treated and untreated samples. The samples were analyzed by observing number of counts as a function of scattering angle (2).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Dyeing Behavior of Fabric

The effect of azeotropic mixture of solvent pretreatments on the dyeing behavior of 80 : 20 PCF was studied by dyeing the pretreated and untreated fabrics for different dyeing time intervals (30, 45, and 60 minutes) and at different temperatures (80, 95, and 110°C). The dye uptake results are presented in the Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. It is clear from the figures that maximum dye uptake is observed in the case of samples pretreated for 8 minutes with the solvent systems Ac-EA-Cf and Ac-MAc-nH. As the pretreatment time increases, the dye uptake is found to increase with increase in dyeing temperature and duration of dyeing. The dye uptake for the samples treated beyond 8 min was found decreasing. The change in dyeing behavior of the treated fabrics reflects changes in fibre structure of the treated fabrics caused by azeotropic mixtures of solvents. Due to solvent pretreatment, the molecular structure of the fabrics gets loosened, resulting in increased dye uptake. The improvement in the dye uptake of treated samples is probably due to the large increase in inter surface by swelling or plasticizing action, greater segmental mobility of polymer molecules, formation of micro voids, and so on [19–21]. The pretreatment enabled to get better dye uptake even at a low temperature of 80°C, and in the cases where the pretreatment time is above 8 minutes, the dye uptake is found to decrease which may be due to the desorption of dye from the fabric due to irreversible swelling of the fibre. The extent of improvement in dyeing behavior was found to be different for different dyes.

Figure 1: Dye uptake of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-EA-Cf (Disperse Red 60 and Reactive Red 124).

Figure 2: Dye uptake of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-EA-Cf (Disperse Orange 96 and Reactive Orange 64).

Figure 3: Dye uptake of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-EA-Cf (Disperse Blue 183 and Reactive Blue 116).

Figure 4: Dye uptake of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-EA-Cf (Disperse Yellow 49 and Reactive Yellow 14).

Figure 5: Dye uptake of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-MAc-nH (Disperse Red 60 and Reactive Red 124).

Figure 6: Dye uptake of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-MAc-nH (Disperse Orange 96 and Reactive Orange 64).

Figure 7: Dye uptake of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-MAc-nH (Disperse Blue 183 and Reactive Blue 116).

Figure 8: Dye uptake of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-MAc-nH (Disperse Yellow 49 and Reactive Yellow 14).

3.2. Fastness Properties

Tables 2, 3, and 4 show the wash, light, and rubbing fastness properties of the treated and untreated 80 : 20 PCF. The results indicate that the solvent treatments involving azeotropic mixtures of solvents have slightly improved the fastness properties of the dyed polyester/cotton blended fabrics. This may be due to the fact that the solvent pretreatments have improved the penetration of the dyestuff molecules into the interior of the fiber matrix and have improved the stability of dye-fiber bond.

Table 2: Wash fastness properties of treated and untreated 80 : 20 PCF.

Solvent system
        Dye
Dyeing temp. (°C)
Untreated
Grading

Pretreatment time (min.)

2
4
6
8
10
20
30

Ac-EA-Cf

80
3
3
3-4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4

A
95
3
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4-5
4

80
3
3
3-4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4

B
90
3
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

80
3
3
3-4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4

C
95
4
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4-5
4

80
3
3
3-4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4

D
95
3
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

Ac-MAc-Nh

80
3
3
3-4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4

A
95
3
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

80
3
3
3-4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4

B
95
3
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
4
4
4

80
3
3
3-4
4-5
4-5
4
4
4

C
95
3
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

80
3
3
3-4
4-5
4-5
4-5
4
4

D
95
3
4
4-5
5
5
4
4
4

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
4-5
4
4

A: Disperse Red 60 and Reactive Red 124; B: Disperse Orange 96 and Reactive Orange 64; C: Disperse Blue 183 and Reactive Blue 116; D: Disperse Yellow 49 and Reactive Yellow 14.

Table 3: Light fastness properties of treated and untreated 80 : 20 PCF.

Solvent system
        Dye
Dyeing temp. (°C)
Untreated
Grading

Pretreatment time (min.)

2
4
6
8
10
20
30

Ac-EA-Cf

80
5
5
5-6
6-7
7
6-7
6
6

A
95
5-6
5-6
5-6
7
7
6-7
6
6

110
6-7
6-7
6-7
7
7
6-7
6
6

80
5
5
5-6
6-7
7
6-7
6
6

B
90
5
5
6
7
7
6-7
6-7
6

110
6-7
6-7
6
7
7
6-7
6-7
6

80
5
5
5-6
6
6
6
5-6
5-6

C
95
5
5
6
6-7
7
6-7
6
6

110
6
6
6
6-7
7
6-7
6
6

80
5
5
5-6
6
6
6
6
5-6

D
95
5
5
6
6-7
6
6-7
6
6

110
6
6
6
6-7
7
6-7
6
6

Ac-MAc-Nh

80
5
5
5-6
6-7
6-7
6
6
6

A
95
5-6
5
5-6
7
7
6-7
6
6

110
6
6
6
7
7
6-7
6
6

80
4-5
5
5-6
6-7
6-7
6
6
6

B
95
5-6
5-6
6
7
7
6-7
6
6

110
6
6
6-7
7
7
6-7
6
6

80
4
4-5
5-6
6
6-7
6
6
6

C
95
5-6
6
6
7
7
6-7
6
6

110
6
6
6
7
7
6-7
6
6

80
4
4
5
6
6-7
6
6
6

D
95
5-6
5-6
6
7
6-7
6-7
6
6

110
5-6
5-6
6
7
7
6-7
6
6

A: Disperse Red 60 and Reactive Red 124; B: Disperse Orange 96 and Reactive Orange 64; C: Disperse Blue 183 and Reactive Blue 116; D: Disperse Yellow 49 and Reactive Yellow 14.

Table 4: Rubbing fastness properties of treated and untreated 80 : 20 PCF.

Solvent system
        Dye
Dyeing temp. (°C)
Untreated
Grading

Pretreatment time (min.)

2
4
6
8
10
20
30

Ac-EA-Cf

80
2-3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

A
95
3-4
4
4
5
5
4-5
4-5
4-5

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
5
5
5

80
2-3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

B
90
3-4
4
4
5
5
4-5
4-5
4-5

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
5
5
5

80
2-3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

C
95
3-4
4
4
5
5
4-5
4-5
4-5

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
5
5
5

        D
80
2-3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

95
3-4
4
4
5
5
4-5
4-5
4-5

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
5
5
5

Ac-MAc-Nh
        A
80
2-3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

95
3-4
4
4
5
5
4-5
4-5
4-5

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
5
5
5

80
2-3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

B
95
3-4
4
4
5
5
4-5
4-5
4-5

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
5
5
5

80
2-3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

C
95
3-4
4
4
5
5
4-5
4-5
4-5

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
5
5
5

80
2-3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

D
95
3-4
4
4
5
5
4-5
4-5
4-5

110
4
4
4-5
5
5
5
5
5

A: Disperse Red 60 and Reactive Red 124; B: Disperse Orange 96 and Reactive Orange 64; C: Disperse Blue 183 and Reactive Blue 116; D: Disperse Yellow 49 and Reactive Yellow 14.

3.3. Weight Loss and Abrasion Resistance Measurements

Table 5 shows the changes in weight and abrasion resistance of the solvent pretreated fabrics in comparison with untreated fabrics. It was found that the weight loss is very small and is dependent upon the pretreatment time. As the pretreatment time increases, there was an increase in weight loss. The abrasion resistance measurements of the treated materials show that there was a slight increase in abrasion resistance. The extent of increase in abrasion resistance was found to increase with increase in treatment duration due to increased pitting of fiber surface. However, the overall effect of solvent pretreatment has not caused any detrimental effect.

Table 5: Weight loss/abrasion resistance of treated and untreated 80 : 20 PCF.

Solvent system
Pretreatment time (min.)
Percentage loss (%)
Abrasion resistance no. cycles

Ac-EA-Cf
2
0.098
7295

4
0.257
7410

6
0.750
7800

8
0.820
7745

10
0.980
7550

20
1.120
7475

30
1.350
7275

Ac-MAc-nH
2
0.050
7255

4
0.130
7380

6
0.475
7763

8
0.650
7715

10
0.780
7510

20
0.987
7442

30
1.100
7245

Untreated
—
—
7245

3.4. Tearing Strength Measurements

Tearing strength measurement of untreated and azeotropic solvent-mixture-pretreated samples showed that there is significant improvement in the tearing strength of the treated materials. In all the cases, the maximum load applied has been found to increase and the elongation percentage remains almost constant. The above changes may be due to very less influence of the solvent treatment on crystallinity index. The mechanical properties of textile fibers depend not only on the degree of crystallinity of fibers but also on the various secondary valence forces that operate in the polymer. The improvement in the strength of treated materials can be attributed to improvement in the structural order of the polymer matrix and generation of more number of crystallites, leading to improvement in the resistance power to deform the material with higher interchain bond. These observations are strengthened by the XRD and DSC results as well. The present observations are in conformity with the reports available on the effect of solvent pretreatment on polymers where, in the solvents, it does not penetrate the compact crystalline region in the polymer and therefore do not affect the strength of the polymer material [22–24].

3.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy Studies

Scanning electron-micrographs of untreated and solvent-pretreated 80 : 20 PCF are presented in Figures 9, 10, and 11. The untreated samples exhibit smooth surface texture. In the treated samples, it appears that the solvent mixture attacked almost the entire surface of the fiber compared to untreated samples. As the duration of pretreatment increased, there was progress in attack and erosion propagates inside the fiber resulting in the formation of elongated pits or cavities on the surface. This is also supported by the fact that the dye uptake of solvent pretreated fabric materials has improved because of development of voids. The observed results resemble those of earlier reports available in the literature [13, 25].

Figure 9: SEM photograph of untreated 80 : 20 PCF.

Figure 10: SEM photograph of AcEA-Cf-treated 80 : 20 PCF.

Figure 11: SEM photograph of Ac-MAc-nH-treated 80 : 20 PCF.

3.6. FTIR Studies

The FTIR spectrum of 80 : 20 PCF before and after solvent treatment is shown in Figures 12 and 13. FTIR was recorded to assess structural change if any made in the fiber of the alteration of existing functional groups as a consequence of azeotropic solvent mixture pretreatments. It was found, from the spectra, that the patterns are almost identical for both treated and untreated samples without any additional peaks. However, on comparing the samples treated with the two different azeotropic solvent mixtures, Ac-EA-Cf caused a slight shift in the position of the peak to a higher wave number than that treated with Ac-MAc-nH due to its higher polarity index. The extent of shift was found to be dependent on solvent pretreatment time. A broad peak at 1730 cm⁻¹ is characteristic of carbonyl stretching of - unsaturated ester. In the case of solvent treated fiber, the width of the peak had reduced and the peak value has been shifted to higher wave number, that is, 1750 cm⁻¹. A small peak in the region between 800 and 850 cm⁻¹ can be accounted for out-of-plane bending of aromatic ring system. The peak at 1250 cm⁻¹ and 1300 cm⁻¹ may be due to C–O stretching of the polymer back bone. An intense peak at 2350–2360 cm⁻¹ can be attributed to methylene C–H stretching. The small peak close to 3000 cm⁻¹ can be correlated to C–H stretching of aromatic ring. An interesting feature in the above-discussed spectrum was that an additional sharp small peak observed at around 3600 cm⁻¹ corresponds to free –OH groups of cellulose component indicating that solvent treatment had increased the extent of amorphous region in the cotton component of the material. This trend was further been supported by the results of strength measurements and SEM studies. The observed small peaks between the regions 1110–1150 cm⁻¹ were due to cellulosic component of the fiber materials [26, 27].

Figure 12: FTIR spectra of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-EA-Cf for different durations; (a) untreated, (b) treated for 4 min and (c) treated for 30 min.

Figure 13: FTIR spectra of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-MAc-nH for different durations; (a) untreated, (b) treated for 4 min and (c) treated for 30 min.

3.7. Thermal Studies

DSC curves of 80 : 20 PCF treated with azeotropic solvents mixtures and untreated samples are shown in Figures 14 and 15. In each case, the starting temperature and peak melting temperature (Table 6) are noted. The final melting temperature corresponds to the melting of the most stable crystallite whereas the peak melting temperature is taken as the temperature at the maximum of melting endotherm [28]. The starting temperature is the starting of the melting endotherm and can be regarded as the melting of the smallest crystallite in the sample. The DSC thermograms of solvent pretreated samples obtained are found to be almost identical with that of untreated samples with small changes in terms of starting temperature, peak temperature, and melting temperature. However, maximum heat flow has increased considerably for solvent pretreated samples due to solvent-induced crystallization. During the interaction of the polymer with the solvent, the solvent enters into the amorphous region of polymer structure, weakens polymer-polymer interaction, replaces it with polymer-solvent interaction, induces extensive segmental motion, and lowers the effective glass transition temperature of material. The polymer chains rearrange themselves into a lower free energy state. This induces crystallization even in the swollen state. The interaction of solvent with the polymer may be of two types, namely, intercrystalline interaction and intracrystalline interaction. In the case of intercrystalline interaction, the solvent penetrates inside the amorphous region only. The polymer chains within this region are under lower stress, and this generally results in the rearrangement of molecular chains [29, 30]. In this case, crystallization takes place in the swollen state and crystalline areas of the sample increase. On the other hand, in the case of intracrystalline interaction, the interacting solvent penetrates inside the crystalline region, decrystallizes the sample, and affects higher lateral order parts of the fiber. In the present study, the interaction of solvent with the fiber material is found to be intercrystalline interaction. This is evident from the considerable increase in the melting heat for solvent-treated samples due to solvent-induced crystallization. It is further supported by the observed small increase in starting temperature, peak temperature, and melting temperature of the treated samples.

Table 6: Thermal behavior of azeotropic solvent-mixture-treated 80 : 20 PCF.

Solvent system
Pretreatment time (min.)

Max. heat flow in mW

Ac-EA-Cf
4
233.2
243.4
270.3
254.6
46.22

30
233.7
243.8
270.6
254.9
46.92

Ac-MAc-nH
4
233.8
242.1
270.5
254.4
44.97

30
233.9
242.7
270.6
254.7
45.09

untreated
233.1
240.6
270.4
254
36.55

, , , and correspond to starting, onset, final, and melting temperatures, respectively.

Figure 14: DSC of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-EA-Cf for different durations; UT : untreated, T₁ : 4 min, and T₂ : 30 min.

Figure 15: DSC of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-MAc-nH for different durations; UT : untreated, T₁ : 4 min, and T₂ : 30 min.

3.8. XRD Studies of 80 : 20 PCF

X-ray diffraction studies on a polymer are mainly concerned, with study of crystalline, amorphous, and semicrystalline regions/phases, which are responsible for observing their respective electrical and mechanical properties. X-ray diffraction pattern of most polymers contains sharp as well as broad and diffuse peak. The sharp peak corresponds to crystalline regions; the diffuse and the broad ones refer to amorphous region [31–34]. The interaction of solvent with polymer results in recrystallization and decrystallization of the corresponding polymer contents. XRD patterns were recorded for the untreated and pretreated 80 : 20 PCF to evaluate the effect of pretreatments and are presented in Figures 16 and 17. The results from XRD reveals that the solvent treatment disturbs the amorphous region of the fabric material used in the present study, probably creates more cavity and pores resulting in the opening up of the structured assembly enhancing more dye uptake when compared with the untreated [35]. Increase in pretreatment duration causes much pronounced effect on the treated materials, which leads to improved dye uptake. The above observation is supported by the weight loss and tearing strength measurements wherein no much loss in weight and strength was observed.

Figure 16: XRD of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-EA-Cf for different durations; UT : untreated, T₁ : 4 min, and T₂ : 30 min.

Figure 17: XRD of 80 : 20 PCF treated with Ac-MAc-nH for different durations,  UT = untreated, T₁ = 4 min. and T₂ = 30 min.

4. Conclusion

The effect of azeotropic mixture of solvent pretreatments on the dyeing behavior of 80 : 20 PCF was studied. As the pretreatment time increased, the dye uptake was found to increase. The slight improvement in the fastness properties of the pretreated fabrics revealed that the treatment has not affected the dye-fibre bond and the improvement in fastness is due to improved dye pickup and dye-fibre bond formation. The abrasion resistance measurements of the treated materials show that there was a small increase in abrasion resistance of solvent pretreated samples up to 6 minutes pretreatment time. Prolonged solvent pretreatments led to decrease in abrasion resistance when treated for more than 6 minutes. As the time of pretreatment increased, the weight loss of the fabric was also found to increase. SEM studies showed that the azeotropic solvent mixtures attacked the entire surface of the fabric materials and caused erosion. As the time of solvent treatment increased, erosion propagated into the fibre structure resulting in the formation of elongated pits or cavities on the surface. FTIR analysis of treated and untreated fabrics showed that there was no structural change or introduction of any functional groups or alteration of the existing groups in the case of solvent-treated materials used in the study. It is also concluded from the XRD and DSC analysis that the solvent treatment has disturbed the crystalline distribution probably by creating more cavity and pores resulting in opening up of the structured assembly. The improvement in the dye uptake of solvent-treated fabrics is due to large increase in intersurface area by swelling and greater segmental mobility of polymer molecules.

References

R. J. Beech, Fibre-Reactive Dyes, Logos Press, London, UK, 1970.

J. M. Cardamone and J. D. Turner, “Cationic applications for union dyeing wool/cotton blends,” Textile Chemist and Colorist & American Dyestuff Reporter, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 49–53, 2000.

S. D. Kim, J. L. Lee, C. H. Ahn, K. S. Kim, and K. S. Lee, “Dyeing of N/P union fabric with reactive disperse dyes,” Journal of Korean Society of Dyers and Finishers, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2004.

S. N. Croft, D. M. Lewis, R. Orita, and T. Sugimoto, “Neutral-fixing reactive dyes for cotton. Part 1—synthesis and application of quaternized S-triazinyl reactive dyes,” Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 195–199, 1992.

T. Sugimoto, “Neutral-fixing reactive dyes for cotton. Part 2—commercial reactive dyestuffs and their classification,” Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists, vol. 108, no. 11, pp. 497–500, 1992.

J. Y. Kim, K. P. Lee, H. M. Park, M. S. Yoon, and K. H. Chao, “The one bath onestep dyeing of nylon/cotton blends with acid dyes and mononicotinic acid-triazine type reactive dyes,” Journal of Korean Society of Dyers and Finishers, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1–7, 2004.

B. Jin-Seok, H. P. Jong, K. Joonseok, and D. K. Sung, “Dyeing and fastness properties of a reactive disperse dye on PET, nylon, silk and N/P fabrics,” Fibers and Polymers, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 174–179, 2006.

K. Mikyung, Y. Seokhan, K. Taekyeong, B. Jin-seok, and Y. Namsik, “Dyeing of cotton and polyester/cotton blend with disperse dyes using sodium 2-(2,3-dibromopropionylamino)-5-(4,6-dichloro-1,3,5-triazinylamino)- benzenesulfonate,” Fibers and Polymers, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 352–357, 2006.

Y. A. Youssef, Y. A. Nahed, A. A. Ahmed, A. A. Mousa, and M. E. Reda, “Alkaline dyeing of polyester and polyester/cotton blend fabrics using sodium edentate,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 342–350, 2008.

M. Shingo, K. Katsushi, H. Toshio, and M. Kenji, “One-bath dyeing of polyester/cotton blends with reactive disperse dyes in supercritical carbon dioxide,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 989–994, 2004.

H. Najafi, R. Assefipour, M. Hajilari, and H. R. Movahed, “One bath method dyeing of polyester/cotton blend fabric with sulphatoethylsulphonyl disperse/reactive dyes treatment by chitin biopolymer,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1127–1135, 2009.

J. W. Davis, “The preparation and dyeing of polyester-cotton fabrics,” Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 77–80, 1973.

B. Muralidharan, T. Mathanmohan, and J. Ethiraj, “Effect of acetonitrile pretreatment on the physicochemical behavior of 100% polyester fabric,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 3871–3878, 2004.

A. Bendak and W. M. Raslan, “Dyeability improvement of polyester pretreated with some alkoxides,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2008.

Dystar Textilfarben GMBH & Co, Dyeing Polyester-Cotton Blend Fabrics, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.

G. Ryland, “Liquid mixrures of constant boiling point,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 22, p. 384, 1899.

M. Lecat, La Tension de Vapeur des Melanges de Liquides L'Azeotropisme, Lamartin, Bruxelles, Belgium, 1918.

W. Bernhard, “Equilibrium melting of flexible linear macromolecules,” Polymer Engineering & Science, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 431–436, 1978.

M. R. Wafaa, B. Ahmed, M. K. Eid, and F. Thanaa, “Modification of polyester fabric by chemical/thermal treatment to improve dyeing ability,” Coloration Technology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 231–236, 2010.

S. R. Arthur, W. Hans-Dietrich, and R. Ludwig, “Interactions of nonaqueous solvents with textile fibers,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 176–183, 1976.

D. Jayshree, R. Kumar, and H. C. Srivastava, “Studies on modification of polyester fabrics 1: alkaline hydrolysis,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 455–477, 1987.

H. D. Weigmann and A. S. Ribnick, “Interactions of nonaqueous solvents with textile fibers: part IV: effects of solvents on the mechanical properties of various textile yarns,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 165–173, 1974.

A. S. Ribnick, H. D. Weigmann, and L. Rebenfeld, “Interactions of nonaqueous solvents with textile fibers: part I: effect of solvents on the mechanical properties of a polyester yarn,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 720–726, 1972.

J. L. Williams and A. Peterlin, “A study of sorption and permeability of gases and vapours in solvent-drawn polyethylene,” Die Makromolekulare Chemie, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 1970.

S. Rajendran, S. S. Ramasamy, and S. P. Mishra, “Studies on dyeing and structural behavior of chemically treated polyester yarns,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 989–1001, 1996.

H. W. Siesler, “Fourier transform infra red characterization of polymers,” in Fourier Transform—Infra Red Characterization of Polymers (Polymer Science and Technology, V. 36), H. Ishida, Ed., Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1987.

A. T. Debra and H. You-Lo, “Solvent-induced structural changes in sulfonated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (SPET) fibers,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1291–1301, 1994.

D. Chidambaram, R. Venkatraj, and P. Manisankar, “Solvent-induced modifications in polyester yarns. II. Structural and thermal behavior,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1555–1566, 2003.

J. Hasan, W. Joshua, and R. Ludwig, “The effects of orientation and crystallinity on the solvent-induced crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate). 1. Sorption- and diffusion-related phenomena,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1795–1811, 1981.

S. Rajendran and S. P. Mishra, “Chemical, structural and thermal changes in PET caused by solvent induced polymer crystallisation,” Polymers and Polymer Composites, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 2007.

A. K. Kulshreshtha, A. H. Khan, and G. L. Madan, “X-ray diffraction study of solvent-induced crystallization in polyester filaments,” Polymer, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 819–823, 1978.

B. H. Knox, H. D. Weigmann, M. G. Scott, and L. Rebenfeld, “The Effects of an aqueous medium on the structure and physical properties of a polyester yarn,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 549–558, 1981.

L. Vicini, A. Seves, M. Canetti, P. Sadocco, and R. Galli, “Influence of an aqueous acetone medium on the thermal behaviour of solvent treated poly(ethylene terephthalate),” Polymer, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1774–1778, 1984.

H. D. Weigmann, “Interaction between fibres and organic solvents,” in Handbook of Fiber Science and Technology Volume 1: Chemical Processing of Fabrics: Fundamentals and Preparation, Part A, M. Lewin and S. B. Sello, Eds., pp. 1–49, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1983.

P. M. Stephen, R. Ludwig, and H. D. Weigmann, “Interactions of nonaqueous solvents with textile fibres: part XI. Nomex shrinkage behavior,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 323–331, 1981.