Combination Phototherapy with a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor and a Potent DNA-Binding Bibenzimidazole: Effects in Haematological Cell Lines

Current treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma includes phototherapy, which involves either the use of narrowband ultraviolet B light or UVA in combination with a psoralen photosensitiser. Therapy typically involves administration of the photosensitiser followed by topical exposure to UVA. A different approach is extracorporeal photopheresis, an ex vivo strategy which is used for more advanced stages of disease. Further, histone deacetylase inhibitors are emerging as potent anticancer agents with suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid and depsipeptide, having received FDA approval for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. We have developed UVASens, an extremely potent, DNA minor groove-binding UVA sensitizer for potential use in phototherapy. We have previously demonstrated the extreme photopotency of UVASens in human erythroleukemic K562 cells. Here we have extended those studies by investigating the photopotency of UVASens in four haematological cell lines, namely, K562, T-cell leukaemic CEM-CCRF, P-glycoprotein overexpressing R100, and transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) cells. In addition, we investigated the effects of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid in combination with UVASens. Using γH2AX as the endpoint, our findings indicate that UVASens-induced phototoxicity in all four of the haematological cell lines. The addition of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid augmented the photopotency of UVASens highlighting the potential clinical applicability of combination therapies.


Introduction
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) describes a heterogenous series of extranodal non-Hodgkin T-cell lymphomas that primarily appear in the skin [1,2].CTCL is characterised by an initial influx of T-cells of the CD4 phenotype in the skin, which have the propensity to home and accumulate in the blood and lymph nodes as the disease develops [2][3][4].The two most common subtypes of CTCL include mycosis fungoides (MF), generally a low-grade lymphoma characterised by skin manifestations and the erythrodermic version Sézary syndrome.Sézary syndrome is an aggressive leukemic form of the disease identifiable by diffuse skin involvement (erythroderma), lymphadenopathy, and the presence of abnormal lymphoid cells circulating in the blood [5,6].Although a rare condition, with annual incidence of approximately 0.2-0.8 per 100,000 [7,8], in its advanced or transformed stages, it is a debilitating disease, differing dramatically in its clinical and histopathologic presentations and subsequent therapeutic considerations [9].While a plethora of treatments are available for CTCL, most remain palliative, and prolonged remissions or cures are rare for advanced stages of the disease.
While the idea of phototherapy has been acknowledged for hundreds of years, the concept of using phototherapy for the treatment of CTCL came to the forefront in the early 1970s.Phototherapy involves the combined use of nonionising electromagnetic energy together with a photosensitising chemical compound-a phenomenon known as photochemotherapy.Currently PUVA therapy is a common avenue of therapy for a variety of hyperproliferative skin diseases including psoriasis and early stages of CTCL.This involves the pretreatment with a psoralen (typically 8methoxypsoralen; 8-MOP), prior to long-wave ultraviolet radiation (320-400 nm, UV A ) exposure.Psoralens directly intercalate into DNA, and upon exposure to UV A radiation become photoexcited leading to the formation of a photoadduct which interferes with DNA synthesis [10].At more advanced stages of CTCL, once the T-cells are no longer dependent on the keratinocytes and begin to migrate to the lymph nodes and peripheral blood, systemic treatment is warranted.At this stage, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) may become a therapeutic option.ECP involves the direct administration of 8-MOP into the plasma fraction of the blood, followed by exposure of the photosensitised peripheral blood mononuclear cells to UV A irradiation, ex vivo [11].In addition to the mechanisms of action associated with PUVA, an immunomodulatory response is believed to be responsible for the beneficial actions behind ECP.Specifically this response is believed to involve dendritic cell maturation, stimulation of T-regulatory lymphocytes and modulation of T-helper cells [11][12][13][14].
Halogenated DNA precursors are an additional set of photosensitisers that have been investigated for their potential use in phototherapy.These UV sensitisers, specifically iodo-and bromodeoxyuridine, are pyrimidine analogues that have been prepared with a halogen substituted in place of the methyl group of thymidine.These results in the analogues compete with thymidine during DNA synthesis and subsequently leading to the insertion of a halogen atom into DNA.Intercalation results in sensitisation of DNA to both UVB irradiation and ionising radiation [14].Photoactivation of these compounds in DNA results in photodehalogenation-the dissociation of the carbon-halogen bond, followed by uracilyl free radical formation.This causes abstraction of H atoms from deoxyribosyl carbons, subsequently inducing DNA strand breakage.While these halogenated DNA precursors have shown to be effective, one major concern is that they are only incorporated into the synthesis phase (S phase) of the cell cycle, limiting the population of cells that are sensitised [15].The limitation of halogenated pyrimidine analogues described above has prompted the investigation of alternative photosensitisers, such as iodinated DNA minor groove-binding bibenzimidazoles [16].
A series of iodinated bis-benzimidazoles have been extensively investigated for their UV A photosensitisation properties [17].Studies have highlighted the photopotency of directly iodinated Hoechst 33258 (prepared by direct iodination of the commercially available Hoechst 33258) and in particular the three structural isomers designated ortho-, meta-, and para-iodo-Hoechst reflecting the position of the iodine substitution on the terminal ring.The ortho-analogue-subsequently referred to as UV A Sens (Figure 1)-has shown remarkable photoefficiency, approximately 1000-fold greater potency than that of the clinically used psoralens [18,19].Upon UV A irradiation, UV A Sens is rapidly dehalogenated to phenyl Hoechst, creating a carbon-centered radical which is analogous to the uracilyl radical produced from the halogenated DNA precursors [17].
Recently, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have evoked significant amounts of attention as a new class of antineoplastic agents, capable of inducing growth arrest, differentiation, and/or apoptosis of transformed cells [20].In 2006, the HDACi suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA, Vorinostat) (Figure 2(a)) became the first HDACi to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).SAHA is a broad-spectrum HDACi that at nanomolar concentrations is capable of inhibiting HDAC activity.Crystallographic studies have demonstrated that the mechanism of SAHA involves its binding to active sites of the HDACwhereby the hydroxamic end of the molecule binds to the zinc atom in the HDAC catalytic site, with the phenyl ring of SAHA projecting out of the catalytic pocket on to the surface of the HDAC [20].Specifically, this drug is for the treatment of progressive, persistent or recurrent CTCL, after which two systemic therapies have failed [21,22].The cyclic tetrapeptide depsipeptide (romidepsin) has also been approved for the treatment of CTCL [23].In addition to their autonomous antitumour capacity, HDACi have shown to be synergistic with a number of commonly used anticancer agents, further signifying their potential as therapeutic agents [24].Considering the already established therapeutic benefits of treatment of CTCL with both HDACi and phototherapy illuminates the imminent possibility of combination therapy, and further the opportunity to identify potential synergistic or additive activities.Here we investigated the application of combination therapy-specifically using SAHA and UV A Sens/UV A -in four haematological cell lines.We utilised γH2AX, a highly specific and sensitive molecular marker of DNA double-strand breaks, to explore the combinatorial effects of HDAC inhibition and phototherapy.
For UV A radiation, UV dosimetry was employed to determine the amount of time required to achieve varying doses of UV A (fluence) at a certain flux (dose rate).Cells were irradiated with relevant fluencies (50 J/m 2 ) of UV A (8 Watt, black light fluorescent lamps: UVP, Upland, CA, USA), and the flux (UVX radiometer, measuring 365 nm, UVP) was adjusted such that irradiations were completed within 2 minutes.

Preparation of Ortho-Iodo-Hoechst.
Synthesis of the bisbenzimidazole analogue ortho-iodoHoechst was performed by Associate Professor Jonathan White (The School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne) as previously described [27].The Hoechst analogue was stored as lyophilised pellets in the dark.Concentrated stock solutions were prepared in 45% (v/v) ethanol/sterile dH 2 O and further dilutions were prepared in dH 2 O.

Drug Treatments.
For experiments which required pretreatment with SAHA, 24 hours prior to initiation of experiment, 5 or 10 μM SAHA (Sigma-Aldrich) were prepared via dilutions of stock solutions in PBS without Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ (PBS(−)).SAHA was stored as a concentrated stock (10 mM) at −20 • C. Following 24 hours incubation with SAHA in a humidified environment (37 • C, 5% CO 2 ), cells were treated with 0.1 or 5 μM ortho-iodo Hoechst 33258 and incubated at 37 • C, 5% CO 2 for 1 hour prior to irradiation with 50 J/m 2 intensity of UV A radiation.Postirradiation cells were incubated for a further hour at 37 • C, 5% CO 2 .Subsequently cells were either examined for γH2AX immunofluorescence assays, apoptosis, cell viability, or western blot using methods described below.

γH2AX
Immunofluorescence.Following varying treatments, each of the 4 cell lines were fixed and stained for γH2AX foci, as described previously [28,29].Images were acquired using a Zeiss 510 Meta Confocal Microscope using a step size of 0.5 μm to obtain optical z slices.Images of cells were then stacked and merged using Metamorph software (Molecular Probes, Oregon, USA) to obtain a 2D image for immunofluorescence visualisation of γH2AX foci (green) and the nucleus (TO-PRO3, blue).The average number of γH2AX foci per nucleus was quantified using Image J analysis software Fiji Version 1.44a).

Immunoblotting.
Histone hyperacetylation was assessed by immunoblotting of total cell protein extracted following treatment for 24 hours with 10 μM SAHA.Cells were pelleted at 1200 revolutions per minute (RPM) for 5 minutes and washed twice in ice-cold PBS, with subsequent procedures all performed on ice.Cell pellets were resuspended in mammalian protein extraction reagent (M-PER) (M-PER; Thermo Scientific, Rockford, USA) at a ratio of 60 μL M-PER reagent to 1 × 10 6 cells.The cell suspension was lysed via agitation for 10 minutes at 4 • C, and supernatant was collected following centrifugation at 14,000 g for 15 minutes at 4 • C. The protein content was measured using the bradford protein assay with bovine serum albumin standards (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) at 595 nM using a Emax Precision Lymphoma microplate reader.Equal amounts of protein (40 μg/lane) were separated using NuPAGE 4-12% gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes.SeaBlue Plus 2 (Invitrogen) prestained molecular weight size standards were used.Membranes were incubated for 1 hour in 5% skim milk ((w/v) in PBS-T)(0.05%Tween 20, PBS(−)), briefly rinsed in PBS-T and incubated overnight with primary antibodies: monoclonal rabbit antiacetylated histone H2B (1 : 200000, Epitomics), polyclonal rabbit anti-acetylated histone H3 (1 : 2000, Millipore), polyclonal rabbit anti-acetylated histone H4 (1 : 2000, Millipore) or monoclonal mouse antiacetylated α-tubulin.Following this, membranes were incubated for an additional hour with corresponding peroxidase labelled secondary antibody (Millipore, Billerica, MA).After incubation, immunoreactive bands were visualised using chemiluminescent reagent (ECL) (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions.Equal loading and transfer were verified by probing the membranes with GAPDH.
2.6.Drug Uptake Studies.Uptake of UV A Sens in K562, LCL, CEM-CCRF, and R100 cells was examined to determine whether differences in DNA damage were due to differences in uptake of SAHA.Cells were seeded at a density of 10 6 cells per mL in 96 well black plates and incubated with 10 μM SAHA for 24 hours at 37 • C, 5% CO 2 (v/v) prior to a 2 hour incubation with 5 μM UV A Sens. Final volumes were made to 200 μL.After incubations, 20 μL cell droplets were dried on slides and rehydrated with PBS(−) immediately prior to imaging on a BX61 upright fluorescence microscope with a 20x UplanFL air Ph1, 0.5 NA objective, and DAPI lens (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical Analysis.
Statistical analysis was measured using Prism (version 5, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed, with a Bonferroni posttest to determine the statistical significance between differing treatments.The level of significance was accepted at * P < 0.05, * * P < 0.01, and * * * P < 0.001.

SAHA Induces Accumulation of Hyperacetylated Histones.
Western blot analysis was undertaken to investigate the acetylation status of histone and nonhistone protein of the four malignant cell lines following treatment with the HDAC inhibitor, SAHA (Figure 2(a)).Total cell lysates of K562, CEM-CCRF, R100, and LCL cells pretreated with or without 10 μM SAHA performed.Our findings showed that over 24 hours SAHA induces the accumulation of hyperacetylated histones-H2B, H3, and H4 in all four haematological cell lines (Figure 2(b)).In addition, the acetylation status of nonhistone cytoplasmic protein-α-tubulin was also examined.We found α-tubulin was hyperacetylated following SAHA treatment in all cell lines with the exception of the nonmalignant, transformed LCL cell (Figure 2(b)).

Effects of SAHA on Cell Viability and Apoptosis.
Treatment with SAHA for both 24 and 48 hours decreases the relative cell viability of K562, CEM-CCRF, R100, and LCL cells (Figures 3(a), 3(c), 3(e), and 3(g), resp.).The greatest reduction in relative cell viability was seen in CEM-CCRF cells.HDAC inhibitor-mediated cell death often involves caspase activity.Caspase 3 and 7 activity was therefore monitored to observe the effect of SAHA on apoptosis.SAHA induced apoptosis in each of the four cell lines (Figures 3(b), 3(d), 3(f), and 3(h)).

SAHA Increases Uptake of UV
A Sens in Cell Nuclei.The uptake of UV A Sens following treatment with SAHA was examined in all four heamatological cell lines.Analysis of the uptake by fluorescence intensity in K562, CEM-CCRF, R100, and LCL cells was undertaken after pretreatment for 24 hours with 10 μM SAHA.Results revealed that when cells were treated with both HDACi and UV A Sens, there was an increase in fluorescence intensity in all cell lines, alluding to possible chromatin remodelling caused by the inhibition of histone deacetylases (Figure 4).Specifically in the case of the R100 cells, the uptake of 1 μM UV A Sens is considerably lower in comparison to the other haematological cell lines.The differences can be attributed to the expression of Pglycoprotein transporter, which effluxes drug out of the cell.With the addition of 10 μM SAHA, the uptake of UV A Sens was significantly increased.Similarly, and to a greater extent, 5 μm UV A Sens causes a significant increase in mean fluorescent intensity, and this is only enhanced following pretreatment with SAHA in K562 and CEM-CCRF cells but not R100 or LCL cells.

Initial DNA Damage in Haematological Cell Lines.
To compare initial DNA damage in the 4 cell lines: K562, CEM-CCRF, R100, and LCL cells, a γH2AX immunofluorescence assay was performed on cells treated with 0.1 μM UV A Sens and 50 J/m 2 with and without 10 μM SAHA.UV A Sens/UV A had a remarkable effect-significantly increasing both mean γH2AX foci and mean fluorescence intensity as compared to untreated cells (P < 0.001) in all four heamatological cell lines-K562 (Figure 5), CEM-CCRF (Figure 6), R100 (Figure 7), and LCL (Figure 8).Combination therapy with 10 μM SAHA enhanced this cytotoxicity, leading to increased γH2AX foci and total nuclear fluorescence in all cell lines also.CEM-CCRF (Figure 6) and K562 cells (Figure 5), respectively, were found to have the greatest accumulation of γH2AX foci and mean fluorescence of cells with UV A Sens/UV A treatment either alone or in combination with SAHA.R100 cell given it expresses P-glycoprotein and transformed LCL cells has significantly lower accumulation of γH2AX foci in comparison to CEMCCRF cells and K562 cells which suggests the necessity of using combinational therapeutics to increase damage in these cell lines.

Discussion
To first evaluate the effects of SAHA alone, primary experiments aimed specifically towards exploring its properties were undertaken.Immunoblot analysis performed on each of the 4 cell lines pre-treated with the broad-spectrum HDACi SAHA demonstrated that as expected, the HDACi induces hyperacetylation of both histone and nonhistone proteins (Figure 2(b)).Histone acetylation is an important regulatory mechanism opening up the chromatin structure and so altering the accessibility of transcription factors to DNA.This in turn modulates gene expression [30].Previously, using MNase digestion assays, we have identified the ability of Trichostatin A, like SAHA a hydroxamic acid and broad-spectrum HDACi, to open the chromatin structure in K562 cells [31].With this in mind, uptake studies of UV A Sens were initiated.The intrinsic fluorescence properties of the bibenzidazimazole, which are enhanced upon binding to DNA, provide an optimal opportunity to further study HDACi.Given that pre-treatment with SAHA results in a more open chromatin conformation, it was hypothesised that there would be increased levels of fluorescence with combination treatment of cells (both SAHA and UV A Sens) as compared to UV A Sens alone.While the mechanisms through which SAHA exerts these actions have not been fully delineated, increased number of binding sites available, an increase in the number of susceptible sites for radial attack, or possibly as a result of a reduction in the scavenging capacity of the chromatin are possible reasons functions of the HDACi.This concept of chromatin remodelling was explored in each of the 4 cell lines.Results revealed that total nuclear fluorescence was increased in all cell types tested when cells were pre-treated with SAHA (Figure 4).Hence this highlights the ability of SAHA to open the chromatin conformation, subsequently allowing UV A radiation to cause increased numbers of double-strand breaks, possibly via indirect DNA damage by free radicals [32].Therefore, we have identified a potentiating effect of SAHA on UV A Sens/UV A -induced cell damage.
In addition HDACi target histone and non-histone proteins which regulate gene expression, cell cycle progression, and cell death [33].They are therefore well accepted to induce apoptosis and subsequently reduce cell viability [34], and so the effect of SAHA on cell viability and induction of apoptosis was assessed using the CellTiter-Blue and Apo-One Homogeneous Caspase 3/7 assay kits, respectively.Indeed, treatment of each of the 4 cell lines with SAHA resulted in a disruption of the proliferative nature of the haematological cell lines.This was observed from cell viability data which indicated that for all of the 4 cell lines, incubation with SAHA for 24 and 48 hours significantly reduced cell viability in a time-dependent manner (Figure 3).Further, HDACi have been shown to induce caspase-independent autophagic cell death and apoptosis by mitochondria/cytochrome cmediated caspase activation pathways [35].Analysis of caspase 3/7 activation in the 4 cell lines provided complementary results to those found for cell viability analysis.SAHA causes significant apoptosis in all cell lines, a finding that is complementary to other studies that have demonstrated SAHA's ability to mediate apoptosis via novel mechanisms involving activation of the intrinsic death pathway resulting in caspase-dependent cell death [36,37].
In line with findings of recent studies demonstrating the efficiency of using the HDACi sodium butyrate and TSA together with PUVA therapy in various cell lines [38] and extending on previous studies conducted in this laboratory using UV A Sens and TSA [39], the concept of using combination treatment involving the Hoechst analogue for the treatment of CTCL was further explored.With the effect of HDACi well established, damage in the form of double-strand breaks from UV A radiation was analysed with γH2AX immunofluorescence assays.DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) constitute one of the most severe forms of DNA damage, having severe consequences on cell survival and maintenance of genomic stability [40][41][42].While they result as by-products of endogenous processes, they are also formed as a consequence of a variety of exogenous insults including ionising radiation (X-rays and γ-rays), ultraviolet rays, oxidative stress, and some chemical agents [43].Upon induction of a DSB, phosphorylation of the histone variant H2AX on the Ser-139 residue occurs, resulting in discrete foci at the site of damage.Consequently γH2AX formation is a rapid and sensitive cellular marker to the presence of DNA DSB [44].Using this model, we were able to identify the relative potency of the ortho-isomer of Hoechst 33258, UV A Sens, upon exposure to UV A radiation both as a standalone treatment, and in combination with SAHA-possibly alluding to an additive, or even synergistic therapeutic potential.
Experiments were undertaken in parallel involving four cell lines to examine the effects of UV A Sens/UV A and HDACi.This allowed for a direct contrast to be made on the effect of the Hoechst analogue in varying cell lines.Combination treatment with SAHA augmented cytotoxicity in all four of the cell lines.A common occurrence in cancer therapy is the development of resistance to drug treatment [45].Malignant cells frequently have a poor response to antitumour drugs on account of the development of the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype [46].One mechanism of resistance is increased expression of the ATP-dependent efflux pump, the membrane P-glycoprotein (PGP) pump, from the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family [47].This pump, encoded by the human multidrug resistance gene 1 (MDR1) gene, causes efflux of drugs from the cell, and hence induces MDR [26].It has been shown that suppression of this PGP-pump in certain cancer patients with the PGP inhibitor-cyclosporine A-significantly improved remission and survival rates [48].Studies have shown R100 cells to have expression levels of mRNA for PGP approximately 50 times to that of its parental cell line-CEM-CCRF [26].This prompted the speculation that there would be increased resistance noticed during experimental undertakings, this however was not the case.With the chromatin remodelling studies, while no significant increase in uptake was noticed following treatment with 1 μM UV A Sens, when these cells were pre-treated with 10 μM SAHA, a significant increase in uptake was seen (Figure 4).This indicates that at low concentrations of UV A Sens, the presence of the PGP pump in the R100 cells leads to efflux of the drug therefore preventing it from binding the nucleus and so resulting in low levels of fluorescence.The increase in fluorescence noticed following the addition of the SAHA suggests an ability of the HDACi to alter the properties of the PGP pump, perhaps through altering the expression of certain genes, therefore allowing the bibenzimidalzole to bind to the cell nucleus, increasing the mean fluorescence intensity.At higher concentrations of UV A Sens, noticeably 5 μM, even in the absence of SAHA, a significant level of uptake of the drug was observed (Figure 4).Therefore, we can infer that the PGP pump is no longer able to efflux the drug-possibly due to the loss of function of the pump, or perhaps at these higher concentrations of UV A Sens, saturation of the binding sites has occurred, and so accounts for the higher levels of fluorescence.Nevertheless, the mechanisms of resistance of the R100 cell line are failing, and so levels measured are similar to that the parental cell line-CEM-CCRF.Further, in the apoptosis and cell viability studies it was found that posttreatment with SAHA an increase in apoptosis (Figure 3(f)) and decrease in viability (Figure 3(e)) of the cell resulted in all 4 of the haematological cells, including R100.This once again indicates that SAHA has an effect to inhibit the MDR properties of this cell line.MDR is an ever-increasing concern, one that constantly threatens anticancer management.In this regard, the ability of the combination treatment investigated in this study-UV A Sens/UV A and SAHA-to overcome this resistance and induce cytotoxicity, regardless of the presence of the PGP drug efflux pump is an important and promising finding.
In addition, it was observed that the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV-) transformed, autologous B-lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) was also sensitive to treatment.LCL cells are a transformed, immortalised cell line [49,50] and as such can be grown for prolonged periods in vitro.While in comparison to K562 cells, an overall increase in resistance was noticed in these cells with respect to γH2AX immunofluorescence assays, pre-treatment with HDACi led to increased overall UV A Sens/UV A -induced cytotoxicity.This was also observed in cell viability and apoptosis studies-where LCLs pretreated for 24 and 48 hours showed significant increase in apoptosis and marked decrease in viability at both time points.LCL cells are a transformed cell line, therefore having similar properties of a malignant cell line, including the ability to rapidly proliferate.Therefore, the findings in this study, whereby this cell line behaves in a similar way to K562 and CEM-CCRF cells, are not unexpected, and only further act to highlight the imminent potential of combination therapy (UV A Sens/UV A and SAHA).
We investigated the effect of preincubation with the hydroxamic acid, SAHA on UVA A Sens/UV A -induced DNA double-strand breaks in 4 haematological cell lines.Overall, the findings in this project indicate that SAHA has synergistic activity, enhancing UV A Sens/UV A -induced cytotoxicity.Broad-spectrum HDACi SAHA has shown to cause accumulation of hyperacetylated proteins, highlighting the possibility that their toxicity is associated with induction of histone hyperacetylation and modulation of gene transcription through chromatin remodelling, leading to the selective activation of genes associated with cell growth and survival [51].The consequence of a more open, transcriptionally active chromatin conformation potentially results in and increased number of binding sites available for the UV A Sens moiety.This speculation was strengthened with findings from uptake studies which demonstrated a positive correlation between pre-incubation with SAHA and increased nuclear binding of UV A Sens, inferred from higher detection levels of nuclear fluorescence.Furthermore, SAHA induced significant increase in apoptosis and decrease in cell viability in all four haematological cell lines.Using γH2AX assays, combination treatment was assessed in multiple haematological cell lines, results demonstrating HDACi's ability to attenuate the effect of phototherapy and so highlighting the potential for combination therapy involving both SAHA and UV A Sens/UV A for the treatment of CTCL.

Figure 2 :
Figure 2: SAHA induces the accumulation of hyperacetylated histone and nonhistone protein in malignant and transformed haematological cells.Chemical structure of SAHA (a).Effects of SAHA on histone H2B, H3, and H4 acetylation, as well as α-tubulin acetylation in haematological K562, CEM-CCRF, R100, and LCL cells.Cells were pretreated with 10 μM of SAHA for 24 hours prior to extraction of whole cell lysates.Immunoblots of specific antibodies to acetylated histones H2B, H3, H4, and α-tubulin are shown.Equal loading and transfer were verified by probing the membranes with GAPDH (b).

Figure 3 :
Figure3: SAHA decreases the viability and increases apoptosis in malignant and transformed haematological cells.K562 (a), CEM-CCRF (c), R100 (e), and LCL (g) cells were treated with the indicated concentration of SAHA for 24 and 48 hours, and the cell viability was measured using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay kit.The data is presented as the percentage of growth inhibition relative to untreated cells.For the measurement of apoptosis, 48 hours after incubation with HDACi, the level of caspase 3/7 activity was analysed in K562 (b), CEM-CCRF (d), R100 (f), and LCL (h) cells using the Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay kit following manufacturer instructions.Results are expressed as means ± SEM, n = 2. * P < 0.05, * * P < 0.01, * * * P < 0.001 as compared to untreated.

Figure 4 :
Figure4: SAHA increases the uptake of UV A Sens in malignant and transformed haematological cells.K562, CEM-CCRF, R100, and LCL cells were pretreated with 10 μM of SAHA for 24 hours prior to 2 hour incubation with either 1 or 5 μM UV A Sens, and the uptake of drug was measured by the fluorescence intensity levels.Given R100 express the P-glycoprotein transporter, uptake of 1 μM of UV A Sens is lower compared to the other cell lines but increases with the addition of 10 μM SAHA as shown in all cell lines.Result are expressed as means ± SD, n = 2. * P < 0.05, * * * P < 0.001.

Figure 5 :
Figure5: HDACi enhance UV A Sens/UV A -induced accumulation of γH2AX fluorescence in K562 cells.Cells were pretreated with 10 μM SAHA for 24 hours prior to a 1-hour treatment with 0.1 μM UV A Sens and UV A radiation of cells with 50 J/m 2 .One hour after irradiation, cells were fixed and stained for γH2AX, following which images were acquired using a Zeiss 510 Meta Confocal Microscope using 0.5 μm z-sectioning (a).Images were stacked and merged using Metamorph software for immunofluorescence visualisation of γH2AX fluorescence (green) in nuclei (TO-PRO-3, blue).Total nuclear fluorescence was measured (b) using Image J analysis software.Mean ± standard deviations from a single experiment performed in duplicate are shown.Bar = 20 μm; 63x magnification.* P < 0.05, * * * P < 0.001 compared to untreated cells.