Indian Journal of Materials Science

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 465905, 5 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/465905

Research Article

⁶⁰Co-Gamma Ray Induced Total Dose Effects on P-Channel MOSFETs

Shashank Nagaraj,¹ Vikram Singh,² Halepoojar Siddalingappa Jayanna,³ Kagalagodu Manjunathiah Balakrishna,⁴ and Ramakrishna Damle⁵

¹Instrumentation Department, Uniphos Envirotronic Pvt. Ltd., Vapi 396195, India

²Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Mandi 175001, India

³Department of Studies in Physics, Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta 577451, India

⁴Department of Physics, Mangalore University, Mangalore 574199, India

⁵Department of Physics, Bengaluru University, Bengaluru 560056, India

Received 25 June 2013; Accepted 28 August 2013

Academic Editors: D. S. Patil and D. Sinha

Copyright © 2013 Shashank Nagaraj et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Total Dose Effect (TDE) on solid state devices is of serious concern as it changes the electrical properties leading to degradation of the devices and failure of the systems associated with them. Ionization caused due to TDE in commercial P-channel Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors (MOSFETs) has been studied, where the failure mechanism is found to be mainly a result of the changes in the oxide properties and the surface effects at the channel beneath the gate oxide. The threshold voltage of the MOSFETs was found to shift from −0.69 V to −2.41 V for a total gamma dose of 1 Mrad. The net negative threshold shifts in the irradiated devices reveal the major contribution of oxide trapped charges to device degradation. The radiation induced oxide and interface charge densities were estimated through subthreshold measurements, and the trap densities were found to increase by one order in magnitude after a total gamma dose of 1 Mrad. Other parameters like transconductance, subthreshold swing, and drain saturation current are also investigated as a function of gamma dose.

1. Introduction

In recent years, one can observe a tremendous increase in the usage of electronic instrumentation for nuclear and space research, and it is often susceptible to high ionizing radiations in space. Considerable attention must therefore be given to possible effects of such an environment on electronic devices. Gamma rays are one of the basic radiation sources used to test the device for space applications. Gamma rays interact with matter in three different ways: photoelectric effect, compton scattering, and pair production. In silicon, the photoelectric effect dominates at photon energies less than 50 keV, and pair production dominates at energies greater than 20 MeV with Compton scattering dominating in the intervening energy range [1]. MOSFETs being widely used in space systems because of their faster switching speeds and simple drive requirements are very sensitive to ionizing gamma radiations. The high threshold voltage shifts caused due to trapped charges reduce the switching speed and also modify the other charge dependent properties like transconductance and mobility [2, 3]. The ionization effects in these devices can be related to either the total amount of radiation that is absorbed (total dose) or the rate at which radiation is absorbed (dose rate) [4]. In the present experiment, the devices are evaluated for total dose effects.

Of most concern in the total dose effects is the creation of hole electron pairs in silicon dioxide. In any silicon technology in which silicon dioxide is in contact with low acceptor doped (p-type) silicon, concern for total dose effects is warranted. The dominant effects are due to holes being trapped at the oxide causing free electrons to be attracted to the Si–SiO₂ interface and effectively resulting in an inversion of the doping near the interface [5]. Thus, the electrons in the region between the two p-regions of a p-channel MOSFET cause leakage currents and change the electrical parameters of the MOSFETs. In addition to hole trapping, interface states are also generated at Si–SiO₂ interface. When a negative bias is applied to the gate of a p-channel MOSFET, positive interface charges cause the threshold voltage to shift towards less negative side, while negative interface charges cause threshold voltage to shift towards the more negative side. Holes transporting through p-channels undergo Coulomb scattering from the charged interface states resulting in reduction in carrier channel mobility and increase in channel ON resistance.

2. Devices and Methods

The ⁶⁰Co-gamma irradiation was performed on ALD1102 P-channel MOSFETs using the Blood Irradiator-2000 at ISRO Satellite Centre, Bangalore. The Gamma irradiator (Blood Irradiator-2000) has a Cobalt-60 source capacity of 675 Ci with photon energies 1.17 MeV and 1.33 MeV. The devices were irradiated for different doses varying from 1 krad to 1 Mrad. All the leads of the devices were shorted and grounded during irradiation as P-channel MOSFETs are very sensitive to even the smallest parasitic currents. The effects of  ⁶⁰Co-gamma rays on P-channel MOSFETs were studied for changes in the threshold voltage (), transconductance (), drain current (), subthreshold swing (), oxide charge density (), and interface charge density ().

The threshold voltage was determined from characteristics. Among several methods available to measure the threshold voltage, one method is to choose a current level and define the gate voltage () required for producing the drain-source current [2]. In the present experiment, the was noted for = −10 μA. The threshold voltage of an irradiated MOSFET shifts towards the positive for interface trapped charge and towards the negative side of the voltage axis for oxide trapped charges. Hence, the net threshold voltage shift () is given by

where is threshold voltage shift due to oxide trapped charges, is threshold voltage shift due to interface trapped charges.

The of a MOSFET which is defined as the small change in drain current with unit increase in gate voltage is measured at constant source-drain voltage ( = −8 V). The Subthreshold swing is measured as the change in the slope of subthreshold curves obtained by plotting along x-axis and ln along y-axis [6]. The subthreshold swing () is calculated using the equation

where is the Gate Voltage, is the drain current.

The interface trap density was estimated from subthreshold measurements using the equation

where is the thermal voltage (0.0259 V),   is the oxide capacitance per unit area, and is the electron charge (1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C) (see [7]).

2.1. Charge Separation Method

The threshold voltage shift due to interface charges () was separated from that due to oxide trapped charges () by subthreshold measurements using the technique proposed by Mc Whorter and Winokur [8]. Using this technique, it is possible to split the total threshold voltage shift () into contribution due to interface trapped charge and oxide trapped charge. There are different methods for separating these two components, but they all use the assumption that interface traps are net neutral at midgap so that voltage shift at midgap () is a measure of oxide hole trapping; that is,

Then, the shift due to interface traps is given by

For a capacitor, one can use the stretchout between midgap and inversion or the stretchout between threshold and midgap on the characteristic of a transistor (which usually requires extrapolating the subthreshold current to midgap) [9]. We note that the assumption of midgap neutrality for interface traps was first used by Lenahan and Dressendorfer [10], reexamined later by McWhorter et al. [11], and still later by Lenahan et al. [12], again. It is then possible to determine the change in the interface charge density () and oxide charge density () using the equations

3. Results and Discussion

Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics at room temperature were carried out on ALD1102 MOSFETs using Keithley I-V Source Measure Units. The devices were characterized for and characteristics before and after irradiation with various doses of gamma rays. The changes in the threshold, subthreshold, and transfer characteristics are analyzed and reported.

3.1. Characteristics

Threshold voltage is extracted from characteristics by keeping the drain-source voltage () constant at −8 V. Figure 1 shows the curves of virgin and gamma irradiated devices. It can be noticed that the curve shifts towards more negative voltage with increase in gamma dose.

Figure 1: characteristics of gamma irradiated P-channel MOSFETs.

The threshold voltage of the devices was found to be −0.69 V for unirradiated (virgin) device and shifted to −2.41 V for device irradiated to a total gamma dose of 1 Mrad. The negative shift in the threshold voltage can be attributed to the buildup of positive oxide charges. Even though the interface charges contribute to the shift in the threshold voltage, the effect of oxide charges dominates. The individual contributions of oxide and interface charges for the threshold voltage shift are reported in Table 2. The is directly related to the drain current and is one of the important parameters of a MOSFET. A high is always preferred when it comes to transistor performance. The transconductance of P-channel MOSFETs was found to decrease from 30.90 × 10⁻⁴ mho (virgin) to 4.04 × 10⁻⁴ mho for a total gamma dose of 1 Mrad. The decrease in transconductance is the result of decreasing slope in the saturation region of curves [13].

3.2. Characteristics

The drain saturation current () is extracted from characteristics by keeping the gate- constant at −6 V. Figure 2 shows the curves of virgin and gamma irradiated devices. It can be noticed that the drain current saturates early with the increase in gamma dose. The drain saturation current is measured at a particular point on the curve in the saturation region.

Figure 2: characteristics of gamma irradiated P-channel MOSFETs.

The was found to be −19.06 mA for virgin device and reduced to −8.13 mA for device irradiated to a total gamma dose of 1 Mrad. The reduction of drain current due to gamma exposure can, in principle, be explained by a shift of threshold voltage () and/or a decrease of mobility (μ) [14]. The reduction in the drain current can also be attributed to the increased channel resistance caused due to carrier removal effect in irradiated devices. The pronounced Coulomb scattering in the channel due to radiation induced interface traps also causes the drain current to reduce.

3.3. Subthreshold Characteristics

Figure 3 shows the subthreshold characteristics of virgin and gamma irradiated P-channel MOSFETs.

Figure 3: Subthreshold characteristics of gamma irradiated P-channel MOSFET.

The decrease in slope of ln versus curves with increase in total dose can be clearly observed. The slope of the preirradiated curve was measured to be 26.66, while the one irradiated to a total gamma dose of 1 Mrad was found to be 11.04. The decreasing slope was analogous to the distortion of the C-V characteristics and is due to an increase in the density of interface traps [13]. A decreased slope means that a larger swing in gate voltage is required to bring the transistor into strong inversion. Therefore, interface traps reduce the switching speed of MOSFETs. The subthreshold swing is found to increase from 9.0 mV/decade (virgin) to 16.10 mV/decade for a total gamma dose of 1 Mrad.

The experimentally obtained values of threshold voltage (), transconductance (), subthreshold swing (), and drain current () for virgin and gamma irradiated devices are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Experimental results of virgin and gamma (γ) irradiated P-channel MOSFETs.

-Dose
(V)
(10⁻⁴ mho)
(mV/decade)
(mA)

Virgin
−0.69
30.90
9.0
19.06

1 Krad
−0.72
30.60
9.62
18.81

10 Krad
−0.84
29.30
10.12
18.17

100 Krad
−1.39
21.32
10.58
14.63

500 Krad
−1.95
11.07
13.34
11.12

1 Mrad
−2.41
4.04
16.10
8.13

Table 2: Threshold voltage shifts and trapped charge densities of gamma irradiated P-channel MOSFETs.

-Dose
(V)
(V)
(V)
(cm⁻²)
(cm⁻²)

1 Krad
−0.03
−0.041
0.011
3.00 10¹⁰
8.33 10⁹

10 Krad
−0.15
−0.169
0.019
1.23 10¹¹
1.44 10¹⁰

100 Krad
−0.7
−0.727
0.027
5.27 10¹¹
2.00 10¹⁰

500 Krad
−1.26
−1.333
0.073
9.67 10¹¹
5.36 10¹⁰

1 Mrad
−1.72
−1.840
0.120
1.33 10¹²
8.72 10¹⁰

3.4. Oxide and Interface Trapped Charges Density

The effect of oxide and interface charges on the threshold and subthreshold characteristics of a MOSFET has been briefed in the earlier sections. As discussed before, both the charges (oxide and interface) contribute to the total threshold voltage shift (), and the individual contribution to the can be identified by using the charge separation technique. Figure 4 shows the total voltage shift and the voltage shifts due to oxide () and interface trapped charges () for various doses of gamma radiation.

Figure 4: Contribution of oxide and interface charges to of gamma irradiated P-channel MOSFETs.

It can be observed from the figure that the interface charges shift the threshold voltage towards positive voltage, while the oxide charges cause the to shift towards more negative voltage. Since the oxide charge density is large compared to interface charge density, the voltage shift due to oxide trapped charges becomes dominating resulting in the total negative shift in the threshold voltage. The for a MOSFET irradiated with 1 Mrad of gamma rays was found to be −1.72 V for which contributes with −1.84 V and contributes with 0.12 V. Similar results were observed for other gamma doses which are summarized in Table 2. The changes in oxide charge density () and interface charge density () are calculated from and . Figure 5 shows the variation in and for various gamma doses.

Figure 5: and of P-channel MOSFETs for various gamma doses.

The and of 1 Mrad gamma irradiated P-channel MOSFETs were found to be 1.33 × 10¹² cm⁻² and 8.72 × 10¹⁰ cm⁻². The calculated values of and for various doses of gamma rays are summarized in Table 2.

4. Conclusion

The gamma ray induced total dose effects on P-channel MOSFETs have resulted in various parametric changes like increase in threshold voltage, subthreshold swing, reduced transconductance, and drain saturation current. Increase in oxide and interface trap densities is found to be the main degradation mechanism of gamma irradiated transistors. From the preceding results, it is very clear that the oxide trapped charges have the major contribution towards threshold voltage shift and the net threshold voltage shift is negative. The measurements confirm the fact that gamma rays seriously degrade the device performance to a greater extent.

References

G. E. Schwarze and A. J. Frasca, “Neutron and gamma irradiation effects on power semiconductor switches,” in Proceedings of the 25th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC '90), pp. 30–35, August 1990.

A. P. G. Prakash, S. C. Ke, and K. Siddappa, “High-energy radiation effects on subthreshold characteristics, transconductance and mobility of n-channel MOSFETs,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1037–1042, 2003.

Y. H. Lho and K. Y. Kim, “Radiation effects on the power MOSFET for space applications,” ETRI Journal, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 449–452, 2005.

J. E. Gover and T. A. Fischer, “Radiation-hardened microelectronics for accelerators,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 160–165, 1987.

N. Mohan, Project Report ECE 709, University of Waterloo.

D. K. Schroder, Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization, Wiley Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1990.

C.-Y. Chen, J.-W. Lee, S.-D. Wang et al., “Negative bias temperature instability in low-temperature polycrystalline silicon thin-film transistors,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 2993–2999, 2006.

P. J. Mc Whorter and P. S. Winokur, “Simple technique for separating the effects of interface traps and trapped‐oxide charge in metal-oxide-semiconductor transistors,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 48, no. 2, p. 133, 1986.

T. R. Oldham and F. B. McLean, “Total ionizing dose effects in MOS oxides and devices,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 483–499, 2003.

P. M. Lenahan and P. V. Dressendorfer, “Hole traps and trivalent silicon centers in metal/oxide/silicon devices,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 3495–3499, 1984.

P. J. McWhorter, D. M. Fleetwood, R. A. Pastorek, and G. T. Zimmerman, “Comparison of MOS capacitor and transistor postirradiation response,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1792–1799, 1989.

P. M. Lenahan, N. A. Bohna, and J. P. Campbell, “Radiation-induced interface traps in MOS devices: capture cross section and density of states of Pb1 silicon dangling bond centers,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 2708–2712, 2002.

T. P. Ma and P. V. Dressendorfer, Ionizing Radiation Effects in MOS Devices and Circuits, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1989.

F. A. S. Soliman, A. S. S. Al-Kabbani, M. S. I. Rageh, and K. A. A. Sharshar, “Effects of electron-hole generation, transport and trapping in MOSFETs due to γ-ray exposure,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1337–1343, 1995.