We study the phases of a Schwarzschild black hole in the Anti-deSitter background geometry. Exploiting fluid/gravity duality, we construct the Maxwell equal area isotherm T=T* in the temperature-entropy plane, in order to eliminate negative heat capacity BHs. The construction we present here is reminiscent of the isobar cut in the pressure-volume plane which eliminates unphysical part of the Van der Walls curves below the critical temperature. Our construction also modifies the Hawking-Page phase transition. Stable BHs are formed at the temperature T>T*, while pure radiation persists for T<T*. T* turns out to be below the standard Hawking-Page temperature and there are no unstable BHs as in the usual scenario. Also, we show that, in order to reproduce the correct BH entropy S=A/4, one has to write a black hole equation of state, that is, P=PV, in terms of the geometrical volume V=4πrH3/3.
1. Introduction
Black holes (BHs) are among the most intriguing solutions of Einstein equations. Their geometric description is fully provided by the theory of general relativity and is discussed in many excellent textbooks. However, this is only half of the story.
Since the original works by Bekenstein and Hawking, some new aspects of the BH behavior emerged once quantum field theory is coupled to a BH background geometry. Even if this is only a “semiclassical” quantum gravity formulation, the outcome has profoundly changed the prospective of the BH behavior.
A stellar mass, classical, BH is characterized by the unique feature of being a perfect absorber with a vanishing luminosity. From a thermodynamical point of view, a classical BH is a zero temperature black body.
However, nuclear size BHs, interacting with quantized matter, are almost perfect black bodies as they emit black body radiation at a characteristic nonvanishing temperature! Moreover, BHs are assigned a thermodynamical property identified with entropy. Thus, there are two complementary descriptions of BH physics: one in terms of pure space-time geometry and the other in terms of thermodynamics. The two descriptions are related to each other through the so-called “first law” of BH (thermo)dynamics as follows:(1)dM=TdS+ϕHdQ+ΩHdJ,
whereM= total mass energy,T= Hawking temperature,S= entropy,ϕH= the Coulomb potential on the horizon,Q= electric charge,ΩH= angular velocity of the horizon, andJ= angular momentum.
The first law (1) is the basis of the thermodynamical description of the BH as a “fluid” wheredMis the variation of total energy split into variation of “internal,” “electrostatic,” and “rotational” pieces, which are then given a thermodynamical meaning. By comparing (1) to the first law as it appears in fluid thermodynamics, one cannot but notice the absence of a fundamental pair of canonical thermodynamical variables, that is, the volume and the pressure of the system. While the volume in question can be naturally identified with the volume excluded by the event horizon [1], it is a bit ambiguous what geometrical quantity is to be identified with pressure [2–5]. However, for BHs in Anti-deSitter background, there is a natural candidate, that is, the cosmological constant [6–12]. In fact, AdS/dS spaces can be sourced by an energy-momentum tensor satisfying the vacuum state equation
(2)P=-ρ=-Λ8πGN.
With this identification, it is possible to write the extended first law in its simplest form as(3)dM=TdS+VdP.
Equation (3) can be rewritten as
(4)d(M-PV)=TdS-PdV,
which allows the identification of the proper thermodynamical potential for the BH:
(5)U=M-PV,M≡H=U+PV,F=U-TS,G=H-TS,
whereUis the internal energy,His the enthalpy,Fis the Helmholtz free energy, andGis the Gibbs free energy.
Equation (3) envisages the BH as a “gas” enclosed in its geometrical volume,V, and subject to an external pressurePgiven in (2). The question naturally arises: what is the equation of state for the gas?
The answer is as follows: take the expression of the Hawking temperature in terms of the geometrical quantities, that is, radius of the event horizon andΛ, replaceλwithP, and solveP=P(T,V). The BH fluid equation makes it possible to investigate the existence of different “phases” of the system and the kind of changes of state [13–16].
Recently, this approach has led to the identification, for charged AdS BH, of the pressure equation with the one of a Van der Waals gas [2–4]. Once this identification is achieved, one can pursue the standard Van der Waals analysis of phase transitions, calculate the critical exponents, and apply the Maxwell equal area construction in the(P,V)plane. At this point, it is worth mentioning that the Maxwell equal area construction can be equally applied in the(T,S)plane at constant pressure. This has been done in [17] with interesting results: (i) the equal area law can be analytically solved; (ii) the unphysical negative specific heat region is cutoff; (iii) a new BH phase structure emerges; (iv) the role of the Van der Waals unshrinkable molecular volume is taken by the extremal BH configuration, thus justifying its stability.
The Van der Waals description of charged BHs assumes a particular interest in the framework of AdS/CFT duality which conjectures a relation between QCD and real gas phase transitions.
For neutral, nonrotating, BHs in AdS background, the liquid-gas coexistence is absent in the sense that below certain temperature there are no more BHs. However, in this case, one speaks of a different type of phase transition between a pure background radiation and stable/unstable BHs [18].
In this paper, we will apply the Maxwell equal area construction in the(T,S)plane to the neutral BH in the AdS background and study how the Hawking-Page phase transition is affected. Although the model does not belong to the same universality class of charged AdS BHs, it still has all the thermodynamical potentials necessary for the Maxwell equal area law construction.
2. Neutral AdS Black Hole and the Area Law2.1. Review of the Hawking-Page Phase Transition
We start from the Schwarzschild Anti-deSitter (SAdS) metric. The line element is given by (GN=1units)
(6)ds2=-(1-2Mr+r2l2)dt2+(1-2Mr+r2l2)-1dr2+r2dΩ(2)2,
whereMis the mass and the AdS curvature radiuslis related to the cosmological constant asΛ=-3/l2. We briefly review the properties of the solution (6) which are relevant for our discussion.
The horizon is determined by the zero of thegrr-1metric component as follows:(7)M=r+2(1+r+2l2).
In the case of Schwarzschild AdS equation (7) shows that for any positive value ofMthere exists only one horizon. As a consequence, this kind of BH does not admit any extremal configuration whereMhas a minimum. As a function ofr+,Mis a monotonically increasing function linearly vanishing asr+→0.
The corresponding Hawking temperatureTHis given by (see Figure 1)
(8)kBT=14πr+(1+3r+2l2).
Equation (8) can be inverted by expressingr+as a function ofTas the free variable. Written in this form, (8) defines the existence of multiple BHs at the same temperature as follows:(9)3l2r+2-4πkBTr++1=0.
This is a quadratic algebraic equation admitting real solutions for
(10)T≥Tmin≡32πl.
ForT<Tmin, there are no BHs and we are in a pure radiation phase. The background heat bath is too cold to admit nucleation of BHs.
Plot of the Hawking temperature showing Hawking-Page phases. ForT<Tmin, there are no BHs but a pure radiation phase. ForT>Tmin, there exists a pair of BHs with radiirl,rsgiven in (12). The smaller BH is (thermodynamically) unstable, while the larger is either locally stable,T<THP, or globally stable forT>THP.
ForT=Tmin, a single BH is formed with a radius
(11)r^=l3.
ForT>Tmin, a pair of BHs (large/small) exists with radii given by
(12)rl,s=T2πTmin2(1±1-Tmin2T2),
wherers<r^andrl>r^. In order to investigate the stability of small and large BHs, we look at the Gibbs free energy (see Figure 2)
(13)G≡M-TS=r+2(1+r+2l2)-πkBTr+2.
BHs in thermal equilibrium with the background correspond to stationary points ofGforT>Tmin. At a lower temperature, the single, global, minimum ofGis the origin, that is,r+=0, and the system is in a pure radiation phase.
Plot of the Gibbs free energy for different temperatures.
ForT=Tmin,Gexhibits an inflexion point forr+=1/2πTmin=l/3. From this temperature on, we recover two BHs with radii given by (12). The smallest corresponds to a local maximum ofG, while the larger one is locally stable being a local minimum. With increasingT, the local minimum ofGlowers until reaching zero for
(14)T=1πl≡THP,
whereTHPis known as the Hawking-Page critical temperature and where the Gibbs energy of a BH of radiusr+=lis degenerate with the Gibbs free energy of a pure radiation at the same temperature. In this case, a BH with radiusr+=lis degenerate with the background radiation. Finally, forT>THP, large BHs are globally stable, absolute minima ofG.
This is a brief summary of the radiation into BH transition as originally introduced by Hawking and Page.
The question of stability of the BHs is also related to the sign of the constant specific heat [10] as follows:(15)CP≡(∂M∂T)P=-2πr+2(1+3r+2l2)(1-3r+2l2)-1,
whereCP<0describes unstable BHs corresponding to local maxima ofG, which cannot be in thermal equilibrium with the surrounding heat bath.
In this paper, we will discuss how to remove negative specific heat BHs by applying the Maxwell equal area construction and see how it affects the Hawking-Page phase structure.
2.2. The Gas Equation
Recently, a number of papers have dealt with the analogy between BHs in AdS and Van der Walls “real” fluids. From this vantage point, particular attention has been given to charged and/or rotating BHs. This approach is made possible if one assigns the cosmological constant the role of pressure in the dual VdW picture. The advantage of the dual picture is that one can exploit well-known properties and computational techniques from the WdV fluid dynamics, to gain a deeper understanding of BH thermodynamics, such as critical behavior and phase transitions. Furthermore, it is known that phase transitions in real fluids match the experimental results only if one applies an isothermal cut, the Maxwell equal area law, in the(P,V)plane.
By exploiting this kind of duality, we have shown in a recent paper that the equal area construction can be implemented in the gravitational sector as well [17]. Working in(T,S)plane, whereTandSare the Hawking temperature and the BH entropy, has given a significant advantage in the sense that the area law can be solved analytically and the negative heat capacity region can be eliminated.
In this paper, we will extend the same approach to the Schwarzschild AdS case. While the liquid-gas transition in the WdV fluid is dual to a small-large BH change in the gravitational picture, the Hawking-Page transition, for neutral BHs, has been interpreted by Witten as the gravitational dual of the QCD deconfinement transition [19, 20]. Thus, the study of the Schwarzschild AdS BH properties can shed more light on the quark-gluon plasma properties presently subject to an intensive research interest [21].
In order to obtain the fluid picture of the SAdS BH, we rewrite (8) as
(16)P=kBT2r+-18πr+2,
where the duality “dictionary” called for substitution:
(17)-Λ8π⟶P.
The graph ofPfor constantTis given in Figure 3. One sees thatPvanishes atr0=1/4πkBTand reaches maximumPM=πkB2T2/2GNatrM=2r0.
Plot of the (rescaled) pressure at fixedT, as a function of the geometric volume of the BH. Equal area regions are colored in black.
Although the graph is not of VdW form, the equal area law can be still defined between r0 and rg which will be determined later. In order to make (16) look like the state equation of a fluid, we still need to associate a proper volume to the system.
In previous works [22, 23], the specific volume of the fluid was identified asv=2rHGN. With respect to this choice, we cannot help but notice the following.
The conjugate canonical variable to the cosmological constant (identified with the inward pressure) is the geometric volume V=4πrH3/3 of the BH since
(18)V≡∂H∂P=4π3r+3,
whereHis given by (7).
Furthermore, it is widely accepted that the BH entropy is given by the area lawS=πr+2. On the other hand, the entropy of a gas is logarithmic in the specific volumev.
Therefore, in order to satisfy both requirements, one has to express (16) in terms of the geometric volume as
(19)P=kBT2(4π3V)1/3-18π(4π3V)2/3,
wherekBis the Boltzman constant.
To compute the entropy, we start from the general formula for a gas:
(20)dS=CVdTT+(∂P∂T)VdV,
whereCVis the specific heat at constant volume. Thus, (19) leads to
(21)dS=kB2(4π3)1/3dVV1/3,S=kB(A4).
We find the BH area law for entropy. Therefore, the area law follows from the gas equation only in terms of the geometric volume of the BH.
3. Equal Area Maxwell Construction
The equal area law was introduced by Maxwell in order to explain the experimental behavior of real fluid. Normally, this construction is applied in the(P,V)plane keeping the temperature constant. Theoretically, it can be derived from the variation of the Gibbs free energyG:
(22)dG=-SdT+VdP.
At constant T, one finds the equal area law:
(23)P*ΔV=∫VlVgPdV,
where P=P* is an isobar defining equal areas and Vl, Vg are the volume of the liquid and gaseous phase. However, if one keeps the pressure constant in (22), the same construction can be done in the (T,S) plane.
In this paper, we construct the Maxwell area law in the latter plane for two reasons:
it is through the temperature graph that the Hawking-Page phase transition has been originally studied [18], and we are interested in the modification of this phase structure;
we have shown in [17] that in this plane the equation for the equal area law can be explicitly solved.
We start from the temperature as a function of entropy given by
(24)kBT=14πS(1+3Sπl2)
and plotted in Figure 4. The graph has a minimum at Smin=πl2/3 and kBTmin=3/2πl. By rescaling (24) with respect to these extremal values, we obtain the reduced form
(25)t=12s+121s,s≡SSmin,t≡TTmin,
which is valid for any value of the cosmological constant. The Maxwell area law follows from requirement that the Gibbs free energy is the same for coexisting BHs. One finds
(26)G=M-TS,ΔG1,2=-∫12SdT=0,T*ΔS1,2=∫12TdS,
which leads to the definition of the equal area isotherm as follows:(27)T*=12π(S1+S2)[1+8P3(S1+S2+S1S2)].
Reduced entropy solutions to the equal area law are obtained solving simultaneously the following system:
(28)t=12s(s+1),t*=1(s0+s)[1+13(s0+s+s0s)].
Introducing s≡x, the above system leads to the following equation:
(29)2x3+x2-7x+3=0,
which has the following solutions:
(30)s0=x1=12,(31)sg=x2=12(13-1),(32)x3=-12(13+1),(33)t*=16(213-1),
where x3 is an unphysical solution leading to negative entropy, and t* is the Maxwell isotherm.
Plot of the temperature as function of the entropy. Equal are regions area shown in black.s0,sg,t*are given in (30), (31), and (33).
Maxwell construction has allowed us to eliminate negative specific heat part in the temperature graph. The motivation for removing this part of the temperature graph comes from the fact that it has no plausible physical explanation and does not allow the system to be in equilibrium with the heat bath. In the (T,S) plane it is the analogue of the unstable (unphysical) part of the VdW graph in the (P,V) plane. The flattening of the temperature graph through the isothermal cut modifies the Hawking-Page phase transition in the following way.
Pure radiation phase survives beyond Tmin=3/2πlup to the higher temperature, given by the isotherm T*:
(34)kBT*=312πl(213-1).
For T=T*, multiple, but stable, BHs form of different entropy. There are no more locally stable BHs that can decay into radiation as it occurs in Hawking-Page picture in the interval Tmin<T<THP.
For T>T*, there exists single, stable BH with positive heat capacity.
One may be tempted to ask what kind of statistical ensemble describes the BH thermodynamics.
Hawking has argued that the suitable description is in terms of canonical ensemble with the generating function to be defined in terms of Helmholtz free energy F=M-TS. This seems to be a suitable picture as long as the cosmological constant is held fixed. On the other hand, when one decides to work in an extended phase space [7, 10], the same function is interpreted as the Gibbs free energy and, thus, the suitable description should be in terms of grand canonical ensemble, since the PV term, a.k.a. the q-potential, defines the generating function for this ensemble. Since in this paper we put in evidence the PV term, and allow P to vary in the (P,V) plane, we are actually dealing with the grand canonical ensemble. An additional motivation is that the Maxwell area construction is based on the Gibbs free energy characterizing the grand canonical ensemble.
In our view, a statistical description can be only formal, until a microscopic structure of the BH is properly understood in terms of a reliable theory of quantum gravity. Nevertheless, working with different ensembles is just a matter of convenience leading to the same equation of state (19).
4. Conclusions
In this paper, we have presented a new scenario for Schwarzschild BH nucleation in the AdS vacuum. This kind of BHs has a well-known, but largely ignored, problem concerning the negative heat for r+<rmin=l/3. Similar negative specific heat regions exist also for other types of BHs. So far, no plausible physical explanation for negative heat capacity has been given. The problem of negative heat capacity is related to the fact that such BHs cannot be in thermal equilibrium with the background; thus, they cannot slowly evolve through a series of successive equilibrium states at different temperature. To avoid these problems, we construct an isothermal cut in the temperature graph which eliminates negative heat capacity region, following the Maxwell equal area prescription in the (T,S) plane.
We also studied the effect of the Maxwell construction on the Hawking-Page transition picture. It turns out that there are significant modifications: BHs start nucleating at a temperature T* higher than the temperature Tmin=3/2πl as in the original Hawking-Page scenario. Above T*, there are only single stable BHs. Therefore, having removed the negative specific heat region, unstable BHs cannot be formed. Along the isotherm T=T*, BHs of different radii have the same negative free energy and from a statistical point of view are equally probable among themselves, but more stable than the pure radiation. Degeneracy between radiation and BHs has been removed since T*>THP.
We have also discussed the corresponding equation of state P=P(V), where the pressure is related to the cosmological constant and V corresponds to the geometric volume of the BH. In the literature, different authors make different choices for the volume to be used in the equation of state, and it seems that there is no unique choice that everybody agrees upon. We have given our contribution to this controversy based on the following argument: if a gas equation is to truly describe a BH; it has to reproduce its basic properties and, in particular, area/entropy relation should follow from thermodynamical arguments. We have shown by an explicit calculation that the geometrical volume V=4πrH3/3 is needed to obtain the correct entropy, at least in the model described in this paper.
KastorD.RayS.TraschenJ.Enthalpy and the mechanics of AdS black holes2009261919501110.1088/0264-9381/26/19/195011ChamblinA.EmparanR.JohnsonC. V.MyersR. C.Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography19996061706401810.1103/PhysRevD.60.064018ChamblinA.EmparanR.JohnsonC. V.MyersR. C.Holography, thermodynamics, and fluctuations of charged AdS black holes199960102010402610.1103/PhysRevD.60.104026TsaiY. D.WuX. N.YangY.Phase structure of the Kerr-AdS black hole2012854904400510.1103/PhysRevD.85.044005NicoliniP.TorrieriG.The Hawking-Page crossover in noncommutative anti-deSitter space201120118, article 9710.1007/JHEP08(2011)097DolanB. P.The cosmological constant and black-hole thermodynamic potentials20112812125020DolanB. P.Pressure and volume in the first law of black hole thermodynamics201128235017DolanB. P.Compressibility of rotating black holes20118412312750310.1103/PhysRevD.84.127503DolanB. P.Where is the PdV term in the first law of black hole thermodynamics?2012InTech10.5772/45746CaldarelliM. M.CognolaG.KlemmD.Thermodynamics of Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes and conformal field theories20001723994202-s2.0-003434064610.1088/0264-9381/17/2/310CveticM.GibbonsG. W.KubiznakD.PopeC. N.Black hole enthalpy and an entropy inequality for the thermodynamic volume20118421702403710.1103/PhysRevD.84.024037LuH.PangY.PopeC. N.Vazquez-PoritzJ. F.AdS and Lifshitz black holes in conformal and Einstein-Weyl gravities20128642204401110.1103/PhysRevD.86.044011BanerjeeR.GhoshS.RoychowdhuryD.New type of phase transition in Reissner Nordström-AdS black hole and its thermodynamic geometry20116961-215616210.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.010BanerjeeR.RoychowdhuryD.Thermodynamics of phase transition in higher dimensional AdS black holes2011201111, article 410.1007/JHEP11(2011)004BanerjeeR.ModakS. K.RoychowdhuryD.A unified picture of phase transition: from liquid-vapour systems to AdS black holes2012201210, article 12510.1007/JHEP10(2012)125SmailagicA.SpallucciE.Thermodynamical phases of a regular SAdS BH201322312135001010.1142/S0218271813500107SpallucciE.SmailagicA.Maxwellʼs equal-area law for charged Anti-de Sitter black holes20137234-543644110.1016/j.physletb.2013.05.038HawkingS. W.PageD. N.Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de Sitter space198387457758810.1007/BF01208266WittenE.Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories19982505532WittenE.Anti-de Sitter space and holography19982253291MyersR. C.VazquezS. E.Quark soup al dente: applied superstring theory2008251111400810.1088/0264-9381/25/11/114008KubiznakD.MannR. B.P−V criticality of charged AdS black holes201220127, article 3310.1007/JHEP07(2012)033GunasekaranS.KubiznakD.MannR. B.Extended phase space thermodynamics for charged and rotating black holes and Born-Infeld vacuum polarization2012201211, article 110