Effect of Addition of Fine SiC Particles on the Dry SlidingWear Behaviour of Extruded 2014 Al-Alloy

Composites of 2014 alloy made by dispersing 10 vol.% of �ne �20–50 μm) SiC particles using vortex method ensuring uniform distribution of SiC particles in thematrix have shownuniformdistribution of SiC particles.Mechanical properties of the composites have also registered an improvement over the alloy. In an attempt to further improve the properties, the compositeswere subjected to hot extrusion of cylindrical rods along with the alloys under similar experimental conditions. A temperature range of 300–350C and an extrusion ratio of 10 : 1 were maintained during the process. e extruded samples were compared for their mechanical properties, and improvement was noted. e mechanism of material failure from fractographic studies showed difference in behaviour between the alloy and composite. Dry sliding wear studies carried out on extruded specimens exhibited improved wear behaviour in composites over alloys asmeasured by volume loss and wear rate.Wearmechanismwas studied from the worn surface and correlated with the wear performance. It was observed that the presence of SiC particles reduces the tendency of delamination and thus material removal from the wear surface.


Introduction
Worldwide, researchers have repeatedly demonstrated on a laboratory scale, attractive properties in aluminium-based metal matrix composites with SiC dispersoids.e property improvements relate to microstructural, mechanical properties such as speci�c modulus, strength, and wear resistance, in addition to a service temperature capability in selected aluminium-based composites with selected second phase dispersoids.It is an open knowledge for researchers in this �eld now as to the alloy systems, second phase�s nature, volume fraction, and fabrication routes that can exhibit improved performance.e properties attained are so attractive that these materials hold potential for applications in aerospace, automotive, electronic, sports, ballistic protection, and other general engineering �elds [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].However, the expectation to see the MMCs as engineering products would need their mass production and con�dence in the ability to subject these materials to secondary processing while maintaining the improved properties attained in the cast condition.Open literature regarding mass production is seldom reported.Attempts at secondary processing of Al-based MMCs especially through extrusion to deform the materials into desired shapes and re�ne the microstructure are being reported substantially now [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]; the extruded MMCs exhibit uniform reinforced distribution, reduced porosity, �ner grain structures, improved mechanical and physical properties, and improved bonding as compared to the cast products.

Property Evaluation. Challenges of extruding Al-based
MMCs have been overcome by the authors in the past and optimised conditions for extrusion established [23].e present paper reports the effect of extrusion under optimised conditions on a 2014 based aluminium alloy and its composite made with 10 vol.%SiC dispersoids and compares the properties, namely, microstructure, mechanical and dry sliding wear properties between the extruded alloy and composite.Material properties attained have been correlated to their microstructure and features obtained as observed in SEM of the tested samples.

Synthesis of Composites.
Aluminium based alloy conforming to 2014 system consisting of Al-4.4%Cu-0.5%Mg-0.8%Si-0.8%Mn was chosen for the present study.e alloys were cast into cylindrical billets of 75 mm diameter using the liquid metallurgy route.For preparing the composites, the alloy was remelted and 10 volume % SiC of size range 20-50 m which was preheated was poured into the melt aer passing through a sieve.During insertion of the dispersoid, the melt was stirred constantly by means of a stirrer placed in the melt operated by a motor.Aer complete insertion of the dispersoids in the molten alloy, the alloy was simultaneously stirred and heated for some time for uniform mixing and temperature.e melt with the dispersoids were then poured into preheated permanent moulds to cast the composites into cylinders of ∼75 mm diameter.

Extrusion of Composites.
A hydraulic press with a capacity of 400 tonne �tted with an extrusion setup was used for the hot extrusion of cylindrical rod by the forward bar extrusion process under optimized extrusion conditions that is, pressing speed of 0.36 mm/sec and billet soaking temperature of 350 ∘ C for 2 hours [23].Specimens of the alloys  and composites homogenized at 480 ∘ C for the period of 12 hours prior to the extrusion were used for the extrusion.e cast billets prior to homogenisation were machined to 50 mm diameter and ∼�0 mm height and extruded using a �at die to cylindrical rods of 15 mm diameter maintaining an extrusion ration of 10 : 1 in all the cases.Samples around 20 mm diameter cut from the cast and extruded specimens were metallographically polished and etched in Kellar's reagent for metallographic studies.e microstructures were observed in the optical microscope and/or JEOL scanning electron microscope operating at 20 KV in the secondary mode of electron emission.
Hardness of the samples was measured on the polished surface using a Vickers's Hardness Tester from K.B. Pruiechnik, Model No. KB250BVRZ applying a load of 5 Kg.An average of at least seven readings was taken at different portions of the sample for comparison between cast and extruded specimens.
e mechanical properties, namely, Yield stress, UTS, and % elongation in the cast and extruded from both alloy and composite were determined using a Universal Testing Machine, of INSTRON make, Model No. 8801.
Dry sliding wear tests were carried out on samples in the form of pins of 10 mm diameter and 25 mm length with a small hole at its end to place the thermocouple, from extruded rods of the alloy and composite.e tests were carried out on a Magnum make wear testing machine as per ASTM G99-05, in which the pin was placed vertically.e pin was made to slide against a rotating stainless steel disc at predetermined speeds of rotation.Using a cantilever, the loads were adjusted.Wear takes place due to the sliding action in the absence of any lubricant.e polished sample was initially used which was slid against the disc before starting the test to make its surface matching with the disc as the running in period.e friction force generated and temperature rise were continuously noted.e weight of the specimen was measured aer a �xed interval of time to measure the weight loss which was then converted to volume loss for comparison.e volume loss was plotted against the sliding distance (measured in meters) travelled, calculated as 2Πrts, where r is the radial distance on the disc where the pin is placed, t is the time in minutes, and s is the speed of rotation of the disc measured in rpm.Tests were carried out at loads of 1, 3, and 4 Kg and sliding speeds of 400, 700, and 1000 rpm upto sliding distance of ∼30,000 m. e fractured and worn surfaces were observed in an FESEM (FEI make model No. Nova Nano SEM 430) to understand the nature of failure and mechanism of wear removal, respectively.
All the above properties were compared between the extruded alloy and composite to understand improvement on extrusion between alloy and composite.

Results and Discussion
3.1.Metallographic Studies.e microstructure of the alloy and composites prior to and aer extrusion is shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.e cast structure (Figures 1(a   distribution can be uniformly seen.In the extruded sample (Figures 1(b) and 2(b)), the features are not well resolved; however a directionality can be seen and there is a general breakdown of the cast structure.Presence of the SiC can be observed but they do not seem to have been broken down in size; this is due to their already small size.

Hardness. e average hardness of the specimens is
shown in Figure 3.It is observed that making composites improves hardness signi�cantly.�owever as expected, homogenisation soens the matrix and a decrease in hardness is observed both for composite and alloy.Again extrusion improves the hardness in the case of both alloy and composite cast composite even over the cast condition.
Interestingly, it may be noted that the difference between the alloy and composite is maintained even aer extrusion.

Tensile
Properties. e stress-strain graph for the extruded alloy and composite is shown in Figure 4 and the average of at least two samples is tabulated in Table 1.
In general, it is found that making composites decreases the strength properties over the base alloy (Figure 5).is is due to the presence of the dispersoids which serve as nucleation sites for fracture.On extrusion, however, strength is improved both for the alloy and composite (Figure 5).e fractured surface of the composite is shown in Figure 6.At a lower magni�cation (Figure 6(a)), it is seen that shearing of the material takes place indicative of its ductile nature.e same can be seen at higher magni�cation (Figure   these dispersoids have been removed too; however, the latter con�rms that the dispersed particles do not serve as nuclei for fracture.is could be due to the very small size of the dispersoids in this case.However, in portions the shearing and initiation of breaking takes place close by (Figure 6(c), marked by arrow and double arrow resp.); which is due to the presence of dispersoids and this probably has led to the comparatively lower tensile properties in composites as compared to their base alloy in the extruded condition.

Sliding Wear Behaviour. e variation of volume loss as a function of different experimental factors for extruded
composite is plotted in Figure 7.It is seen that there is a mixed effect of the experimental factors on the volume loss.Maximum volume loss throughout the duration of the test is observed at 400 rpm and 3 Kg load and the minimum at 1000 rpm at 1 Kg load.Increasing only the load and keeping the speed of rotation constant results in higher volume loss; however, increasing speed at a constant load has the reverse effect.It is felt that when the load is increased due to pressure more material is lost but when the speed is increased since the specimen gets less time for contact the material loss is less.Likewise, varying either speed or load can result in improved wear properties (inverse of volume loss) over other experimental conditions.e maximum temperature rise and friction force during the duration of the test under different experimental conditions plotted in Figure 8 shows a clear increase in the maximum temperature reached with load under all speeds of rotation, but there is a decrease in the frictional force with increased speed of rotation.e lower friction force could be the cause of comparatively material loss under these conditions.However, the maximum temperature reached in well below 100 ∘ C and no signs of seizure have been observed during the tests.It may also be mentioned that the maximum friction force and maximum temperature are reached quite early during the test and remains around the same value for most part of the duration of the test, exhibiting decrease at intervals when the specimen is unmounted for weight measurements (depicted as gaps in the plot).As an example, a typical plot of the variation of the temperature and friction force with time during a particular experimental set of conditions that at 700 rpm and 3 Kg load is plotted in Figure 9.
As in the case of composite, the extruded alloys too exhibit a mixed response in the behaviour of volume loss with sliding distance with varying experimental conditions of speed and load (Figure 10).In general, highest speed of rotation tested that is, 1000 rpm results in lower volume loss as compared to the lower speeds of 400 and 700 rpm.is is due to the less time of contact with high speeds of 1000 rpm.is observation is corroborated by the less surface damage F 13: Worn surface depicting features commensurate with observed wear loss.
of the worn surface under high speeds.It is interesting to note that increasing load does not necessarily increase the volume loss at a particular sliding speed in the case of alloy.
No seizure has been observed in this case unlike in the case of composites.
A glance comparison of just the -axis scales between Figures 7 and 10 indicates the marked degree of improvement in the wear resistance on making composites.However, for comparison, the volume loss at two sliding distances 10000 and 30000 m has been compared for the alloy and composite under the different experimental conditions in Figures 11(a Improvement in the wear performance (inverse of volume loss) in composites over the base alloy is attributed to the resistance offered by the SiC dispersoids in the matrix.e load during wear is taken up by the hard SiC dispersoids saving the matrix from the exposure.is is in accordance with the oen quoted improved performance of wear resistance of composites over its matrix alloy.However, in this case due to extrusion, the material has been further strengthened due to consolidation resulting in still better resistance to wear.us the improvement in wear performance in the extruded case is expected to be better than the cast conditions; this point however cannot be ascertained as it is not possible to compare the wear behaviour which is a relative phenomenon with past �ndings.e size of the SiC dispersoids in this case being very �ne would further inhibit wear during sliding as larger particles have the tendency of breaking and falling off thus increases sudden and unpredicted wear/material losses.In this case, however, no breaking of dispersoids has been seen (Figure 12) ruling out material loss from dissociation of particles from dispersoids oen seen in composites made from larger SiC dispersoids [24][25][26][27].
3.4.1.Wear Mechanism: Worn Surface.e worn surface of the composites is characterized by wear marks throughout the tested region and it is scattered or continuous depending on the severity of wear; conditions which have exhibited high wear loss have deeper groves.All the above features can be seen on the worn surface (Figure 12) and the surface damage is commensurate with the harshness of the experimental conditions.Under mild conditions of wear like under high speeds of rotation, the material does not come in contact continuously with the rotating disc and hence the wear tracks are not continuous and very shallow (Figures 12(a) and 12(b)).In between the grooves, wear debris can be seen trapped which in all probability these are SiC dispersoids that have been removed during the process of wear (Figure 12(b) marked by arrow).Due to the sliding action of the specimen surface and rotating wheel, the surface layer of the specimen is affected through the formation of wear tracks.Wear tracks show that the material from in between the tracks loosened up which on further exposure (continuous) to the wear conditions �nally gets delaminated and chipped off (Figure 12(c)).e mechanism of wear (material) removal is through delamination of layers (surface) progressively as can be seen in the �gure.In cases where severe material loss is recorded, it is possible that the material has completely fallen off (Figures 12(d) and 12(e)).Again, seizure of the test specimen is characterized by material �ow and sudden change in wear track (Figure 12(f) marked by double arrow).e effect of material damage can be seen in the subsurface region.
e worn surface in the case of alloys observed aer completion of the tests is characterised by grooves and material removal between grooves; material overlapping is also observed in case of severe material damage (Figure 13) and in some cases cracking of the surface is also observed.All these features are commensurate with the wear loss; under conditions where less or least wear has been observed shallow grooves are observed (Figure 13(a)); as the conditions get harsher the grooves become deeper and broader and material removal takes place from between the grooves (Figure 13(b)).Material overlap precedes seizure and this relates to severely worn conditions (Figure 13(c)); material cracking has been observed to accompany high damage conditions (Figure 13(d)).

Concluding Remarks
Al-based 2014 alloy with �ne SiC dispersoids (size 20-50 m) has been successfully extruded to cylindrical rods along with alloys of the base matrix under identical experimental conditions.Forming composites in general increases the hardness and extrusion further increases it.However, the tensile properties record a decrease in making composites as compared to the alloy.
Dry sliding wear of extruded composites shows a marked improvement over extruded alloys under all conditions of load and speed tested over the entire sliding distance tested.e material removal method in the case of alloys consists of �rst making groove marks on the surface, then as the conditions continue the grooves get deeper and the material forming a layer on the surface being worn, then this surface could form a layer somewhat elevated from the specimen and then gradually peels off.In the case of composites also material removal is through progressive delamination of worn surface layers.However, the difference in material removal mechanism between the alloy and composite is that in the former under severe conditions of material loss, material is scooped out from the grooves but in the case of composites, the complete layer peels off.is is probably due to the presence of the dispersoids that assist in delamination of the worn layer.Again inspite of the alloy recording much higher wear loss as compared to the composite, seizure is not observed in the former whereas composites tend to seize at even lower material loss if conditions are harsh.Seizure of the test specimen is characterized by machine stopping abruptly and depicted as material �ow over layers and change in wear track as seen in the worn surface studies.

F 3 :
Hardness under different conditions.

F 4 :F 5 :
Stress-strain curves for extruded (a) alloy and (b) composites.UTS for alloy and composite under different conditions.
) and 2(a)) is characterized by rounded grains in which the SiC

F 6 :
Fractographic representation of composite specimens.T 1: Tensile properties of extruded specimens.

3 )F 7 :F 8 :
Variation of volume loss with sliding distance under different experimental conditions for extruded composite.Variation of maximum temperature and friction force for composites under different experimental conditions.

F 9 :
Variation of temperature and friction force with time at sliding speed of 700 rpm and 3 Kg load.

3 )F 10 :
Variation of volume loss with sliding distance for extruded alloy under different experimental conditions.6(b)) from the cup and cone arrangement of the fractured surface.At some positions, SiC can be seen encapsulated in the cup (Figure 6(b), marked by arrow) or even in the portions from where the sample has not broken (Figure 6(c));

3 )F 11 :F 12 :
Comparative volume loss of composite and alloy at different experimental conditions.Worn surface of composites under different experimental conditions.