AAAAbstract and Applied Analysis1687-04091085-3375Hindawi Publishing Corporation97813710.1155/2010/978137978137Research ArticleVariational Approaches for the Existence of Multiple Periodic Solutions of Differential Delay EquationsChengRong1HuJianhua2Mallet-ParetJohn1College of Mathematics and PhysicsNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjing 210044Chinanuist.edu.cn2College of ScienceUniversity of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyShanghai 200093Chinausst.edu.cn201092200920103003200915122009110120102010Copyright © 2010This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The existence of multiple periodic solutions of the following differential delay equation x(t)=f(x(tr)) is established by applying variational approaches directly, where x, fC(,) and r>0 is a given constant. This means that we do not need to use Kaplan and Yorke's reduction technique to reduce the existence problem of the above equation to an existence problem for a related coupled system. Such a reduction method introduced first by Kaplan and Yorke in (1974) is often employed in previous papers to study the existence of periodic solutions for the above equation and its similar ones by variational approaches.

1. Introduction

We are concerned in this paper with the search for 4r-periodic solutions (r>0) of a class of differential delay equations with the following form

x'(t)=-f(x(t-r)), where x, fC(,), and r>0 is a given constant. Equation (1.1) occurs in variety of applications and describes many interesting types of phenomena. Taking f(x)=-δ+sinx, then (1.1) with the form

x'(t)=δ-sin(x(t-r)),t0,δ0,r0 arises in the study of phase-locked loops which are widely used in communication systems . Furthermore, many equations occurring in other fields of applications can be changed to the form of (1.1) by changing variables. For example, letting x(t)=eu(t)-1, then the equation

x'(t)=αx(t-1)(1+x(t)) can be changed to the form of (1.1). Equation (1.3) was first proposed by Cunningham  as a nonlinear population growth model. Later Wright in  mentioned it as arising in the application of probability methods to the theory of asymptotic prime number density. For applications of (1.3) and its similar ones on ecology, one may see .

Because of extensive applications, (1.1) and (1.3) have been studied by many authors through various methods [13, 523]. In 1962, Jones in his paper of  considered (1.3) and obtained the existence of periodic solutions of (1.3) by applying fixed point theory. Nussbaum  also used fixed point theory  for the truncated cones of Krasnosel’skii to give an existence result on periodic solutions.

Besides various fixed point theorems, the global Hopf bifurcation theorem for differential delay equations introduced by Chow and Mallet-Paret , qualitative theory of ordinary differential equations, some well-known results on the existence of closed orbits for Hamiltonian vector fields, coincidence degree theory introduced by Mawhin [26, 27], and the Poincaré-Bendixson theorem are proved to be very useful tools in searching for periodic solutions of differential delay (1.1) and (1.3).

A different approach for establishing the existence of periodic solutions for the differential delay (1.1) was introduced by Kaplan and Yorke in their paper in . Employing the method, they could reduce the search for periodic solutions of (1.1) to the problem of seeking periodic solutions for a related system of ordinary differential equations, which is called the coupled system to (1.1). Following the reduction idea of Kaplan and Yorke, Li and He [17, 18] were able to translate (1.1) with more than one delay to a coupled Hamiltonian system. Then they used variational approaches to study the coupled Hamiltonian system and obtained some existence results of multiple periodic solutions of the equations. This proves that variational approaches [28, 29] also are very powerful tools to study periodic solutions of (1.1), (1.3), and their similar ones.

Recently, Guo and Yu  do not use Kaplan and Yorke’s reduction technique and apply variational methods directly to study the existence of multiple periodic solutions of (1.1) with x and f being vectors in n. That is to say they do not reduce the existence problem of (1.1) to an existence problem of a related coupled Hamiltonian system. By applying the pseudo-index introduced by Benci in , they obtained a sufficient condition on the existence and multiplicity of periodic solutions for (1.1). To the author’s knowledge, this is the first time in which the existence of periodic solutions of (1.1) is studied by variational methods directly.

Let us say some words about the two methods. The advantage of direct variational method is that the function f could be a vector in n while f is only being a scalar in Kaplan and Yorke’s reduction method. But Kaplan and Yorke’s reduction method can deal with (1.1) with more than two delays while direct variational method used by Guo and Yu only admits one delay in (1.1).

Motivated by the work of Guo and Yu, in this paper we will also use variational approaches directly to study the existence of periodic solutions of (1.1). But our arguments are quite different from theirs. Throughout this paper, we make the following assumptions.

f(x)C(,), and for any x, f(x)+f(-x)=0, that is, f(x) is odd.

f(x) satisfies

limx0f(x)x=-α0,limxf(x)x=-α. In order to state our main result, we need the following definition.

Definition 1.1.

For each α, define μ(α)=m=1{σ-[(-1)mπ2r(2m-1)-α]-σ-((-1)m)},ν(α)=m=1σ0[(-1)mπ2r(2m-1)-α], where the two functions σ-(t) and σ0(t) are given by σ-(t)={1,t<0,0,t0,σ0(t)={1,t=0,0,t0.

It is easy to see that μ(α) and ν(α) are well defined. Let μ0=μ(α0), μ=μ(α), ν0=ν(α0), and ν=ν(α). Then our main result states as follows.

Theorem 1.2.

Suppose that f satisfies (H1) and (H2). Then the following conclusions are true.

If α(π/2r)(2-1), then (1.1) possesses at least max{μ0-μ,μ-μ0-ν0} nontrivial geometrically different 4r-periodic solutions.

If α(π/2r)(2-1), |f(x)+αx| is bounded, and 0xf(y)dy+(1/2)αx2 converges to - as |x|, then the conclusion of (i) also holds.

Remark 1.3.

We say that two solutions of (1.1) are geometrically different if one cannot be obtained by time rescaling of the other. We will use [31, Theorem 2.4] to prove the main result.

2. Variational Functional on Hilbert Space

In this section, we will construct a variational functional of (1.1) defined on a suitable Hilbert space such that finding 4r-periodic solutions of (1.1) is equivalent to seeking critical points of the functional.

We work in the Hilbert space H=H1/2,2(S1,) which consists of those functions xL2(S1,) having weak derivative x'L2(S1,). The simplest way to introduce this space seems as follows. Each function xL2(S1,) has the following Fourier expansion:

x(t)=a0+m=1+(amcosπ2rmt+bmsinπ2rmt), where am,bm. H is the set of those functions satisfying

x2=4ra02+2rm=1+m(am2+bm2)<+. With this norm ·, H is a Hilbert space with the following inner product:

x,y=4ra0a0+2rm=1m(amam+bmbm), where y=a0+m=1+(amcos(π/2r)mt+bmsin(π/2r)mt).

For each xH, we define a functional I:H by

I(x)=04r12x'(t+r)x(t)dt+04rF(x(t))dt, where F(x)=0xf(y)dy.

By Riesz representation theorem, H identifies its dual space H*. Then we define an operator J:HH*=H by extending the bilinear form

Jx,y=04rx(t+r)y(t)dt,x,yH. In fact, define a map L:H×HH by L(x,y)=Jx,y. Then L is linear in x and y, respectively, and there exists a positive number M>0 such that

L(x,y)Mxy. Thus L is a bilinear form from H×HH. So J is a bounded linear operator on H and kerJ=.

For any xH, define a mapping K:H as

K(x)=04rF(x(t))dt. Then the functional I can be rewritten as

I(x)=12Jx,x+K(x),xH. According to a standard argument in , one has, for any x,yH,

I(x),y=04r12(x'(t+r)-x'(t-r))y(t)dt+04rf(x(t))y(t)dt. Moreover K':HH is a compact operator defined by

K(x),y=04rf(x(t))y(t)dt. Our aim is to reduce the existence of periodic solutions of (1.1) to the existence of critical points of I. For this we introduce a shift operator Γ:HH defined by

Γx(t)=x(t+r). It is easy to compute that Γ is bounded and linear. Moreover Γ is isometric, that is, Γx=x and Γ4=id, where id denotes the identity mapping on H.

Write

E={xH:Γ2x(t)=-x(t)}. By a direct computation, solutions of the Euler equation of I in E are exactly solutions of (1.1).

Lemma 2.1.

As a closed subspace of H, E has the following property: E={x(t)=m=1+(a2m-1cosπ2r(2m-1)t+b2m-1sinπ2r(2m-1)t)}.

Proof.

It is easy to see that E is a closed subspace of H. For any x(t)=a0+m=1+(amcos(π/2r)mt+bmsin(π/2r)mt)E, Γ2x=-x implies that x(t+2r)=-x(t). Then one has a0=-a0,am=(-1)m+1am,bm=(-1)m+1bm, that is, am=bm=0forevenm. Thus, for any x(t)E, x(t)=m=1+(a2m-1cosπ2r(2m-1)t+b2m-1sinπ2r(2m-1)t). Hence we get the conclusion.

If we restrict J on E, a direct check shows that J over E is self-adjoint. For any xE, let Jx(t)=m=1+(a2m-1Jcos(π/2r)(2m-1)t+b2m-1Jsin(π/2r)(2m-1)t). Let y=m=1+(a2mcos(π/2r)(2m-1)t+b2m-1sin(π/2r)(2m-1)t). Then

x'(t+r)=m=1+[(-1)mπ2r(2m-1)(a2m-1cosπ2r(2m-1)t+b2m-1sinπ2r(2m-1)t)],04rx'(t+r)y(t)dt=(-1)m[π(2m-1)a2m-1a2m-1+π(2m-1)b2m-1b2m-1].   According to the definition of the inner product in E, we have

a2m-1J=(-1)mπ2ra2m-1,b2m-1J=(-1)mπ2rb2m-1, that is,

Jx(t)=m=1+[(-1)mπ2r(a2m-1cosπ2r(2m-1)t+b2m-1sinπ2r(2m-1)t)].

Let I|E denote the restriction of I on E. Then we have the following lemma.

Lemma 2.2.

Critical points of I|E over E are critical points of I on H.

Proof.

Note that any xE is 4rperiodic and f is odd. It is enough for us to prove that I'(x),y=0 for any yH and x being a critical point of I in E.

For any yH, we have

Γ2I(x),y=Γ2Jx,y+Γ2K(x),y=Jx,Γ-2y+K(x),Γ-2y=04rx'(t+r)y(t-2r)dt+04rf(x(t))y(t-2r)dt=-04rx'(t+r)y(t)dt-04rf(x(t))y(t)dt=-I(x),y. This yields Γ2I'(x)=-I'(x), that is, I'(x)E.

Suppose that x(t) is a critical point of I in E. We only need to show that I'(x),y=0 for any yH. Writing y=y1y2 with y1E,y2E and noting that I'(x)E, one has

I(x),y=I(x),y1+I(x),y2=0+0=0. The proof is complete.

Remark 2.3.

By Lemma 2.2, we only need to consider I|E. Therefore in the following I will be assumed on E.

For any α, we define an operator Lα:HH by

Lαx,y=04rαx(t)y(t)dt.

It is not difficult to see that L is a bounded self-adjoint linear mapping on E. Furthermore, for any x(t)E, let Lαx(t)=m=1+(a2m-1Lαcos(π/2r)(2m-1)t+b2m-1Lαsin(π/2r)(2m-1)t). Let y=m=1+(a2m-1cos(π/2r)(2m-1)t+b2m-1sin(π/2r)(2m-1)t). Then

04rαx(t)y(t)dt=2rαa2m-1a2m-1+2rαb2m-1b2m-1. Similar to (2.19), we have

a2m-1Lα=α2m-1a2m-1,b2m-1Lα=α2m-1b2m-1, that is,

Lαx(t)=m=1+α2m-1[a2m-1cosπ2r(2m-1)t+b2m-1sinπ2r(2m-1)t].

Set

E(m)={xE:x(t)=a2m-1cosπ2r(2m-1)t+b2m-1sinπ2r(2m-1)t},En=E(1)E(2)E(n). Let Pn be the orthogonal projection from E to En, then one has

Pnx(t)=m=1n(a2m-1cosπ2r(2m-1)t+b2m-1sinπ2r(2m-1)t). Denote by M+(J-Lα),M-(J-Lα), and M0(J-Lα) the positive definite, the negative definite, and the null subspace of the self-adjoint operator J-Lα, respectively. Then we have the following lemma.

Lemma 2.4.

For m1, let λm=(-1)m(π/2r)(2m-1)-α. Then the following conclusions hold: M+(J-Lα)=m=1,λm>0E(m),M-(J-Lα)=m=1,λm<0E(m),M0(J-Lα)=m=1,λm=0E(m). Moreover for m large enough, dimM-(Pm(J-Lα)Pm)=2μ(α)+2j=1mσ-((-1)j),dimM0(Pm(J-Lα)Pm)=2ν(α).

Proof.

For xm=a2m-1cos(π/2r)(2m-1)t+b2m-1sin(π/2r)(2m-1)t, consider the following eigenvalue problem: (J-Lα)xm=λxm. From (2.19) and (2.25), one has [(-1)mπ2r-α2m-1]a2m-1=λa2m-1,[(-1)mπ2r-α2m-1]b2m-1=λb2m-1. The above two equalities show that J-Lα is positive definite, negative definite, and null on E(m) if and only if λm=(-1)m(π/2r)(2m-1)-α is positive, negative, and zero, respectively.

By Definition 1.1 and for m large enough,

dimM-(Pm(J-Lα)Pm)=2j=1mσ-[(-1)mπ2r(2m-1)-α]=2j=1mσ-[(-1)mπ2r(2m-1)-α]-2j=1mσ-((-1)j)+2j=1mσ-((-1)j)=2μ(α)+2j=1mσ-((-1)j). The last equality of Lemma 2.4 is obvious. The proof is complete.

3. Proof of the Main Result

In this section, we will use [31, Theorem 2.4] to prove our main result. To state the theorem, we need the following notation and definition. For θS1 and xE, define an action T on E by

T(θ)x(t)=x(t+θ). A direct computation shows that

Fix(S1)={xE:T(θ)(x)=x,θS1}={0}.

Definition 3.1.

I satisfies (PS)c condition on E if every sequence {xm}E with I(xm)c and I'(xm)0 possesses a convergent subsequence.

Write L0=Lα0 and L=Lα. Then [31, Theorem 2.4] applied to I on E can be stated as follows.

Lemma 3.2.

Suppose that there exist two closed S1-invariant linear subspace of E, Vand, W and a positive number s>0 such that

(V+W) is closed and of finite codimension in E,

L(W)W with A=J-L0 or A=J-L,

there exists β0 such that infxVI(x)β0,

there exists β such that I(x)β<I(0),xWBs={xW:x=s},

I satisfies (PS)c condition for β0cβ.

Then I possesses at least (1/2)[dim(VW)-codim(V+W)] geometrically distinct critical orbits in I-1([β0,β]).

Lemma 3.3.

Assume that (H1), (H2), and the assumptions of (i) or (ii) of Theorem 1.2 hold. Then I satisfies (PS)c condition on E.

Proof.

We first show that {xm}E is bounded. Assume that {xm} is not bounded. By passing to a subsequence, if necessary, we may assume that xm as m.

Case (i). Suppose that α(π/2r)(2-1). Then by Definition 1.1, ν=0, which yields M0(J-L)=0. Thus J-L has bounded inverse, that is,   κ>0 such that

(J-L)-11κ.

For any xE, define

I0(x)=K(x)+12L0x,x,I(x)=K(x)+12Lx,x. Then I(x) can be written as I(x)=12(J-L0)x,x+I0(x),orI(x)=12(J-L)x,x+I(x). By condition (H2), we have I(x)x0,asx. This means that for any 0<γ<κ there exists δ>0 such that I(x)γx,asxδ.

Note that (J-L)xm-I'(xm)=-I(xm). We have

xm-(J-L)-1I'(xm)xm-(J-L)-1I'(xm)=(J-L)-1((J-L)xm-I'(xm))(J-L)-1I(xm)1κγxm. Then by the above estimates, xmκκ-γ(J-L)-1I'(xm)κκ-γ1κI'(xm)0,asm. This contradicts xm as m. Hence xm is bounded.

Now we show that xm has a convergent subsequence. Notice that P0:EkerJ= is of finite rank and K':HH is compact. Therefore we may suppose that

K(xm)y,P0xmzinEasm. Since J+P0 has continuous inverse (J+P0)-1, it follows from (J+P0)xm=I'(xm)-K'(xm)+P0xm that xm=(J+P0)-1(I'(xm)-K'(xm)+P0xm)(J+P0)-1(z-y)asm. Thus {xm} has a convergent subsequence.

Case (ii). Assume that {xm} is not bounded. Since |f(x)+αx| is bounded, there exists a constant C>0 such that

I(x)<C,xE. Observe that (J-L)x=I'(x)-I(x) and I'(xm)0 as m, (J-L)xmI'(xm)+I(xm)C+1asm. Since xm and F(xm)+(1/2)αxm2 converges to - as m, I(xm)=I(xm)-12(J-L)xm,xm>I(xm)-C+12xm. Let m, then (3.17) implies ->-. This is a contradiction. Therefore {xm} is bounded. With the same discussion as that of Case (i), we can prove that {xm} has a convergent subsequence. The proof is complete.

Now we are ready to prove our main result.

Proof of Theorem <xref ref-type="statement" rid="thm1.2">1.2</xref>.

Since x(t)E is periodic and F(x(t)) is independent of t, I is S1-invariant and I' is S1-equivariant according to the action T on S1.

Case (i). Assume first μ0-μ>0. Take two subspaces V and W as

V=M+(J-L)M0(J-L),W=M-(J-L0). Since inner product is continuous and codim(V+W)=0, the assumption (1) of Lemma 3.2 holds. Let A=J-L0. We can check easily that A(W)W. By Lemma 3.3, I satisfies (PS)c condition. Thus the assumptions (2) and (5) of Lemma 3.2 hold.

By the proof of Lemma 3.3, M0(J-L)=0. For xV=M+(J-L), there is a suitable constant c1>0 such that

(J-L)x,xc1x2. Then by (3.8), for any xV, I(x)=12(J-L)x,x+I(x)12c1x2-c2x, where I(x) is defined in (3.6). Hence there exists β0<0 such that the assumption (3) of Lemma 3.2 holds.

By (H2), we have

I0(0)=0,I0(x)x0asx0, where I0(x) is defined in (3.6). For any xW, we can choose a suitable constant c3>0 such that (J-L0)x,x-c3x2. Then for any xWBs, I(x)=12(J-L0)x,x+I0(x)-12c3x2+c4x=-12c3r2+c4r. Choose r such that -(1/2)c3r+c4<0 and take β=max{β0,-(1/2)c1r2+c2r}. Then the assumption (4) of Lemma 3.2 holds.

Therefore by Lemma 3.2, I possesses at least

=12[dim(VW)-codim(V+W)] geometrically different critical orbits in I-1([β0,β]).

From Lemma 2.4 and Definition 1.1, we can show that for m large enough

=12[dimM-(Pm(J-L0)Pm)-dimM-(Pm(J-L)Pm)]=12[2μ(α0)-2μ(α)]=μ0-μ.

Secondly, if μ-μ0-ν0>0, then we replace I by -I and set

V=M-(J-L),W=M+(J-L0). With a similar argument to the case μ0-μ>0, we can show that -I satisfies the assumptions (1)–(5) of Lemma 3.2. Then -I has at least =(1/2)[dim(VW)-codim(V+W)] geometrically different critical orbits in I-1([β0,β]). By Lemma 2.4, Definition 1.1, and for m large enough, =12[dimM-(Pm(J-L)Pm)-dim(M-(Pm(J-L0)Pm)M0(Pm(J-L0)Pm))]=12[2μ(α)-(2μ(α0)+2ν(α0))]=μ-μ0-ν0.

Case (ii). Assume that μ0-μ>0. We take the same subspaces V and W as in Case (i). By a similar discussion, we can prove that the assumptions of (1), (2), and (4) of Lemma 3.2 hold. By Lemma 3.3, I satisfies (PS)c condition on E.

By condition (ii) of Theorem 1.2, I(x) is bounded, that is,   c5>0 such that

I(x)c5,xE. Moreover I(x0)- as x0M0(J-L) with x0+.

Write x=x++x0V, where x+M+(J-L). We have

I(x)=12(J-L)x+,x++I(x++x0)>12c6x+2+c5x+I(x0). Thus the assumption (3) of Lemma 3.2 holds. Then by Lemma 3.2 and the proof of Case (i), I possesses at least μ0-μ geometrically different critical orbits in I-1([β0,β]). The subsequent proof is similar to that of Case (i). We omit the details. The proof is complete.

FurumochiT.Existence of periodic solutions of one-dimensional differential-delay equationsThe Tôhoku Mathematical Journal. Second Series19783011335MR0470418ZBL0376.34057CunninghamW. J.A nonlinear differential-difference equation of growthThe Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1954404708713MR0067343ZBL0055.31601WrightE. M.A non-linear difference-differential equationJournal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik195519416687MR0072363ZBL0064.34203MayR.Stablity and Complexity in Model Ecosystems19739Princeton, NJ, USAPrinceton University PressChowS. N.WaltherH. O.Characteristic multipliers and stability of symmetric periodic solutions of x˙=g(x(t1))Transactions of the American Mathematical Society1988307112714210.2307/2000754MR936808ZBL0672.34069HerzA. V. M.Solutions of x˙=g(x(t1)) approach the Kaplan-Yorke orbits for odd sigmoid gJournal of Differential Equations199511813653MR132940210.1006/jdeq.1995.1066ZBL0823.34068KaplanJ. L.YorkeJ. A.Ordinary differential equations which yield periodic solutions of differential delay equationsJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications1974482317324MR036481510.1016/0022-247X(74)90162-0ZBL0293.34102KaplanJ. L.YorkeJ. A.On the stability of a periodic solution of a differential delay equationSIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis197562268282MR036136710.1137/0506028ZBL0241.34080YorkeJ. A.Asymptotic stability for one dimensional differential-delay equationsJournal of Differential Equations197071189202MR025279910.1016/0022-0396(70)90132-4ZBL0184.12401ChapinS.Periodic solutions of differential-delay equations with more than one delayThe Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics198717355557210.1216/RMJ-1987-17-3-555MR908261ZBL0644.34064WaltherH. O.Homoclinic solution and chaos in x˙(t)=f(x(t1))Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications19815777578810.1016/0362-546X(81)90052-3MR623379ZBL0459.34040WaltherH. O.Density of slowly oscillating solutions of x˙(t)=f(x(t1))Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications198179112714010.1016/0022-247X(81)90014-7MR603381ZBL0451.34063JonesG. S.The existence of periodic solutions of f(x)=αf(x(t1)){1+f(x)}Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications196253435450MR014183710.1016/0022-247X(62)90017-3ZBL0106.29504NussbaumR. D.Periodic solutions of special differential equations: an example in nonlinear functional analysisProceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section A1978811-2131151MR529382ZBL0402.34061NussbaumR. D.A Hopf global bifurcation theorem for retarded functional differential equationsTransactions of the American Mathematical Society1978238113916410.2307/1997801MR482913ZBL0389.34050NussbaumR. D.Uniqueness and nonuniqueness for periodic solutions of x(t)=g(x(t1))Journal of Differential Equations1979341255410.1016/0022-0396(79)90016-0MR549582LiJ.HeX.-Z.LiuZ.Hamiltonian symmetric groups and multiple periodic solutions of differential delay equationsNonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications199935445747410.1016/S0362-546X(97)00623-8MR1656528LiJ.HeX.-Z.Multiple periodic solutions of differential delay equations created by asymptotically linear Hamiltonian systemsNonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications1998311-2455410.1016/S0362-546X(96)00058-2MR1487530GuoZ.YuJ.Multiplicity results for periodic solutions to delay differential equations via critical point theoryJournal of Differential Equations20052181153510.1016/j.jde.2005.08.007MR2174964ZBL1095.34043LlibreJ.TarţaA.-A.Periodic solutions of delay equations with three delays via bi-Hamiltonian systemsNonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications200664112433244110.1016/j.na.2005.08.023MR2215817ZBL1101.34055JekelS.JohnstonC.A Hamiltonian with periodic orbits having several delaysJournal of Differential Equations2006222242543810.1016/j.jde.2005.08.013MR2208051ZBL1163.34386HanM. A.Bifurcations of periodic solutions of delay differential equationsJournal of Differential Equations2003189239641110.1016/S0022-0396(02)00106-7MR1964472ZBL1027.34081DormayerP.The stability of special symmetric solutions of x˙(t)=αf(x(t1)) with small amplitudesNonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications199014870171510.1016/0362-546X(90)90045-IMR1049789ZBL0704.34086BrowderF. E.A further generalization of the Schauder fixed point theoremDuke Mathematical Journal196532575578MR020371910.1215/S0012-7094-65-03261-8ZBL0137.32601ChowS. N.Mallet-ParetJ.The Fuller index and global Hopf bifurcationJournal of Differential Equations19782916685MR049256010.1016/0022-0396(78)90041-4ZBL0369.34020MawhinJ.Periodic solutions of nonlinear functional differential equationsJournal of Differential Equations1971102240261MR029482310.1016/0022-0396(71)90049-0ZBL0223.34055MawhinJ.Equivalence theorems for nonlinear operator equations and coincidence degree theory for some mappings in locally convex topological vector spacesJournal of Differential Equations1972123610636MR032870310.1016/0022-0396(72)90028-9ZBL0244.47049RabinowitzP. H.Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Applications to Differential Equations198665Washington, DC, USAAmerican Mathematical Societyviii+100CBMS Regional Conference Series in MathematicsMR845785MawhinJ.WillemM.Critical Point Theory and Hamiltonian Systems198974New York, NY, USASpringerxiv+277Applied Mathematical SciencesMR982267BenciV.On critical point theory for indefinite functionals in the presence of symmetriesTransactions of the American Mathematical Society1982274253357210.2307/1999120MR675067ZBL0504.58014FannioL. O.Multiple periodic solutions of Hamiltonian systems with strong resonance at infinityDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems199732251264MR143207810.3934/dcds.1997.3.251ZBL0989.37060