Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Volume 2021 (2021), Article ID 8860207, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8860207

Research Article

Comparison of Modular Control during Side Cutting before and after Fatigue

Naoto Matsunaga,1,2 Kenta Aoki,³ and Koji Kaneoka⁴

¹General Education Core Curriculum Division, Seigakuin University, 1-1 Tosaki, Ageo, Saitama, Japan
²Waseda Institute for Sport Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan
³School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan
⁴Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Naoto Matsunaga; n_matsunaga@seigakuin-univ.ac.jp

Received 30 July 2020; Revised 18 December 2020; Accepted 23 December 2020; Published 7 January 2021

Academic Editor: Ukadike C. Ugbolue

Copyright © 2021 Naoto Matsunaga et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the coordination between the trunk and lower limb muscles during sidestep and to compare this coordination before and after fatigue intervention. The intervention was lateral jump until exhaustion. Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) was used to extract muscle synergies from electromyography. Subsequently, to compare the muscle synergies, a scalar product that evaluates the coincidence of synergies was calculated. Three muscle synergies were extracted before and after the intervention from the NMF analysis. In accordance with the evaluation of the scalar product, these synergies were the same before and after the intervention. One of these synergies that engaged the internal oblique/transversus abdominis, rectus femoris, and adductor muscle was activated from before landing to midstance during sidestep motion; therefore, this synergy is thought to suppress excessive hip abduction. However, the activation timing of this synergy was delayed after the intervention (, effect size: 0.54, Wilcoxon test). This delay is considered to decrease hip stability. Thus, this change may induce a reduction in hip control function.

1. Introduction

Muscle synergy is defined as a group of muscle activities in synchrony and is extracted using mathematical methods, such as principal component analysis and nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) [1]. In synergy analysis, electromyography is divided into two factors: (i) muscle synergy, which represents the relative weighting; and (ii) the time-varying component, which represents the relative activation of the muscle synergy [1]. Research on muscle synergy has been widely conducted in the fields of rehabilitation and neuroscience to evaluate activities of daily living, such as reaching tasks and locomotion [2–4]. In recent years, it has expanded to sports science and is expected to improve sports performance and prevent sports injuries [5–13].

Groin pain syndrome is common in soccer and rugby, wherein repetitive sidestep or side cutting motions are frequent [14–17]. It is defined as a dysfunction around the pelvis that results from poor mobility, stability, or coordination between the trunk and lower limbs, causing pain around the inguinal area [18]. Matsunaga et al. reported that the muscle synergies between the trunk and lower limb muscles during side cutting were different with and without groin pain [12]. However, whether the alteration of the synergy occurs because of groin pain or whether groin pain occurs because of the alteration of the synergy is unclear. In addition, groin pain is believed to be caused by overuse [14, 19, 20]. Overuse injury in sports occurs when the musculoskeletal structure receives a repetitive force, producing a combined fatigue effect over a period beyond the capacities of the specific structure [21, 22]. A previous study reported that the synergy changes due to transitory fatigue [11], and we hypothesized that it might be one of the risk factors for overuse injuries. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the synergies during side cutting before and after transitory fatigue intervention. We hypothesized that the delay of the time-varying component will occur because the synergy time-varying component of the subjects with groin pain will be delayed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

We recruited young healthy men with an exercise routine. Nine men (: age, years; height,  m; and weight,  kg) participated in this study. They had performed hard training as high school students and had been performing physical activities two to three times per week at the recreational level when they participated in this study. Their sports included soccer, badminton, baseball, and rugby. The exclusion criteria included a history of lower limb disorders that included groin pain syndrome, neurological disorders, or lower limb surgery. This study was approved by the ethics committee of our university (2010–270). All the subjects read and signed an informed consent form prior to participation.

2.2. Test Exercises

The test exercise was 5 repeated sidesteps with a width of 1.1 times the subject’s height. The protocol was performed in the following order: first, five repeated sidestep motions at full effort, followed by the fatigue intervention, and finally, 5 repeated sidestep motions at full effort in the fatigue state. The subjects performed lateral jumps as a fatigue intervention. Lateral jumps can impose a large load on many muscles around the hip [23]. The width of the lateral jump was the same as the subject’s height. The fatigue intervention required continuous lateral jumping, and fatigue was reached when the subjects could not keep jumping in sync with the metronome (DB-60, BOSS Co., Japan) rhythm at 60 Hz or jumping the distance of their height.

2.3. Data Measurement

To measure muscle activity, a wireless electromyography (EMG) system (EMG-025, Harada Electronic Co., Japan) was used. The activities of the following 8 muscles were measured as described by Matsunaga et al. [11]: rectus abdominal (RA), external oblique (EO), internal oblique/transversus abdominal (IO/TrA), erector spinae (ES), rectus femoris (RF), semitendinosus (ST), gluteus medius (Gmed), and adductor (ADD). All the muscles measured were on the right side. The RA electrodes were placed 3 cm lateral to the umbilicus. The EO electrodes were placed midway between the costal margin of the ribs and iliac crest, approximately 45° from the horizontal plane. The IO/TrA electrodes were placed approximately 2 cm medial and inferior to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), and the ES electrodes were placed 3 cm lateral to the L4 spinal process. The RF electrodes were placed on the belly of the muscle corresponding to the center point between the ASIS and the upper margin of the patella. The ST electrodes were placed on the center point between the ischial tuberosity and medial epicondyle of the femur. The Gmed electrodes were placed 3 fingerbreadths from the lower region of the iliac crest. The ADD electrodes were placed 4 fingerbreadths from the lower region of the pubic symphysis. Before the surface electrodes were attached, the skin was rubbed with a skin abrasive and alcohol to reduce skin impedance to a level <2 kΩ. Pairs of disposable Ag/AgCl surface electrodes (Vitrode F-150S; Nihon Kohden Co., Japan) were attached parallel to the muscle fibers. The sampling frequency was set to 1000 Hz. To normalize the EMG data, a maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) test was performed on each muscle before the test exercise. The MVC for the RA was obtained, while the subjects performed a partial sit-up with their knees flexed and manual resistance was applied. For the EO, the subjects were in a supine position, with their knees and trunk flexed and rotated to the left. Resistance was applied to the shoulders, with the trunk extending and rotating to the right. For the IO/TrA, the trunk was instead flexed and rotated to the right, with the resistance applied at the shoulders, and the trunk extending and rotating to the left. For the ES, the MVC task was trunk extension performed in the prone position with manual resistance applied to the upper thoracic area without leg movement. For the RF, the subject sat on a chair with the hip and knee flexed to 90° and performed knee extension. Resistance was applied at the shank in the knee flexion direction. For the ST, the subjects performed knee flexion in the prone position, with the knee flexed to 45°. Resistance was applied at the shank in the knee extension direction. For the Gmed, the subject was in a side-lying position with the right side up and the hip extended and performed hip abduction with resistance applied in the hip adduction direction. For the ADD, the subject was in the side-lying position with the right side down with the hip extended and performed hip adduction with resistance applied in the hip abduction direction. Manual resistance was gradually increased up to the subject’s limit and then held for 3 s.

Three three-dimensional motion capture cameras (Oqus, Qualisys, Sweden) were used to determine the timing of foot contact and push-off. The laboratory (global) orthogonal coordinate system (frame) followed the right-hand rule and had the positive -direction orientated toward the left, the positive -direction orientated toward the back, and the positive -direction orientated vertically upward. To obtain kinematic data, reflective markers (QPM190, Qualisys, Sweden) were attached to 10 landmarks as follows: bilaterally on the edge of the toe on the shoes, the internal and external pastern on the shoes, the anterior superior iliac spinae, and 2 markers were placed on the floor, on either side of the subject. Kinematic data were collected at 200 Hz and synchronized with the EMG system.

2.4. Data Analysis

We analyzed the third round of sidestep motion during the test exercise. We determined the timing of landing using the acceleration of the edge of the toe marker. The EMG data were obtained from 200 ms before landing to 200 ms after push-off based on the kinematic data. A custom MATLAB (MATLAB R2016, MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) code was used to analyze the EMG data. The raw data were band-pass filtered between 20 and 450 Hz and full-wave rectified. Then, they were interpolated to 200 time points. The EMG data were normalized relative to the associated MVC data of the muscle. As previously described, NMF was performed to extract modules [1], as follows:

where is a -by- initial matrix ( is the number of muscles and is the number of time points). The initial matrix comprised normalized EMG data and a cycle for each of the 8 muscles; therefore, is a matrix with 8 rows and 200 columns. is a -by- matrix ( is the number of synergies) and represents muscle synergy, is an -by- matrix and represents the time-varying component, and is a -by- residual error matrix. Formula 2 indicates that matrix “” calculated using formula 1 reaches a minimum. is a vector; therefore, the calculated is written as . For each subject, we iterated the analysis by varying the number of synergies between 1 and 8, and then selected the least number of synergies that accounted for >90% of the variance accounted for (VAF) [5, 24, 25]. Global VAF was calculated based on the findings of previous studies.

where goes from 1 to and goes from 1 to . Thus, increases from 1 to 8, and increases from 1 to 200 in this study. In addition, to confirm the reliability of our analysis, we also calculated the local VAF based on Hug et al. [24]:

where represents the muscle. We defined the adoption standard for a local VAF >75% [24].

To compare before and after the intervention, the scalar product (SP) was calculated based on the findings reported by Cheung et al. [4]:

The SP for the use of the correlation coefficients can assess the similarity of . We defined the module as similar if the SP was above 0.75 [4].

In addition, to evaluate the level of fatigue, wavelet transform was performed based on the findings reported by Smale et al. [8], and the instantaneous mean frequencies (IMF) were calculated.

where is the time-dependent power spectral density. After that, the IMF was averaged to calculate the mean frequency. The analyzed range of data was the same as that of the NMF analysis.

2.5. Statistics Analysis

Following the results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, we used the Wilcoxon test to compare the mean frequency, peak timing of the time-varying component [7, 11], and muscle synergy weighting before and after fatigue using SPSS (ver 24.0, USA). The significance level was set at 0.05.

3. Results

Figure 1 shows the mean frequency of each muscle before and after fatigue. Among them, the mean frequency of the ADD decreased significantly (, effect size: 0.67). Table 1 shows the relationship between the number of modules and global and local VAF. When 2 synergies occurred, the mean global VAF exceeded 90% for the first time. However, the mean local VAF did not exceed 75%. On the other hand, when 3 synergies occurred, the mean global and local VAF exceeded 90% and 75%, respectively. Therefore, 3 synergies were compared before and after fatigue in this study.

Figure 1: Comparison of the mean frequency before and after fatigue. RA: rectus abdominis; EO: external oblique; IO/TrA: internal oblique/transversus abdominis; ES: erector spinae; RF: rectus femoris; ST: semitendinosus; Gmed: gluteus medius; ADD: adductor muscle. Significant difference ().

Table 1: Relationship between the number of synergies and the global and local VAF. The number of synergies is decided when the global VAF exceeds 90% and the local VAF exceeds 75% for the first time.

Number of synergies = 2
Number of synergies = 3

Pre
Post
Pre
Post

Global VAF (%)

Local VAF (%)
RA

EO

IO/TrA

ES

RF

ST

Gmed

ADD

VAF: variance accounted for; RA: rectus abdominis; EO: external oblique; IO/TrA: internal oblique/transversus abdominis; ES: erector spinae; RF: rectus femoris; ST: semitendinosus; Gmed: gluteus medius; ADD: adductor.

Figure 2 shows the extracted modules before and after fatigue. The SPs of modules 1, 2, and 3, which indicate the coincidence of muscle synergies, were 0.96, 0.97, and 0.86, respectively. For synergy 1, we found no significant difference in the peak activation timing (, effect size: 0.15). The activation timing of synergy 2 was significantly delayed after fatigue (, effect size: 0.54). Before fatigue, the activity of synergy 2 was observed in the first half of the sidestep sequence; however, it was seen in the second half after fatigue. The activation timing of synergy 3 did not differ before or after fatigue (, effect size: 0.36), and it occurred in the second half of the sidestep sequence. In addition, the weighting of ST decreased (, effect size: 0.54), while that of ADD increased significantly (, effect size: 0.54).

Figure 2: Extracted synergies (left) and the activation pattern (right) during side cutting before and after fatigue. RA: rectus abdominis; EO: external oblique; IO/TrA: internal oblique/transversus abdominis; ES: erector spinae; RF: rectus femoris; ST: semitendinosus; Gmed: gluteus medius; ADD: adductor muscle. Significant difference ().

4. Discussion

This study investigated modular control during a sidestep sequence before and after fatigue. The results indicate that the synergies were similar before and after the intervention, and the main finding of this study was that the activation timing of synergy 2 was delayed after fatigue.

Muscle fatigue was confirmed using wavelet analysis. The spectrum shifts toward lower values if muscle fatigue occurs [26, 27]. In our study, the median frequency of ADD decreased significantly after fatigue. This result indicated that ADD was fatigued after the fatigue intervention.

The data from synergy 1 mainly reflected the Gmed and IO/TrA activities during the first half of the sidestep sequence. The activation level of synergy 1 gradually increased, and the peak activation was 25–35% of the sidestep sequence corresponding to the time of landing. The Gmed was the highest contributing muscle, and the IO/TrA and RF activities were also notable in this synergy. The extensor muscles of the lower limb began activating before landing to enhance joint stability and prevent injury. Therefore, it is theorized that synergy 1 functions in response to weight loads [11, 28–34].

Synergy 2 indicated coordination among IO/TrA, RF, and ADD. Before fatigue, this synergy was activated before landing until the middle stage of the sidestep sequence. It is considered that this synergy has a role in hip control because the hip abduction moment occurs after landing [11, 35]. In contrast, the activation timing of this module is delayed after fatigue. Matsunaga et al. [11] reported that synergy 2 is delayed in subjects with groin pain when compared with healthy subjects. Therefore, we believe that this timing delay may be related to the development of groin pain.

Synergy 3 engaged mainly the EO and ST and was activated in the last one-third of the sidestep sequence, corresponding to toe off. The EO contributes to trunk stability and ST activates hip extension. Therefore, synergy 3 is involved in the movement of kicking off the ground. In addition, the weighting of the ST decreased after fatigue, and the contribution of the ADD may show compensatory increases because the main function of the ADD is hip adduction, with hip extension being a supplemental function. The risk factors for groin pain are overuse [14, 19, 20, 36], dysfunction of the ADD [37–42], and hip stability [18, 43]. These reports indicate that compensatory ADD activity may influence the pathogenesis of groin pain.

This study had some limitations. First, our sample size was small. However, the results showed a sufficient effect size; therefore, we believe that the impact on the data in this study was small. In addition, we did not include women as our subjects because we attached devices on the unclothed upper body. This might have affected the sample size. Second, we could not perform a full motion analysis; therefore, we focused only on the timing of foot contact and toe off the ground to divide the sidestep into phases. Third, we did not judge fatigue using other methods.

5. Conclusion

We examined trunk and lower limb muscle coordination during the sidestep sequence and compared it before and after the intervention. As a result, the same 3 synergies were observed before and after the intervention. However, the activation timing of the synergy that functioned as a hip adduction control was delayed due to the intervention. This motor control deficiency may be related to groin pain syndrome and other injuries to the hip.

Data Availability

The data will be used in a future study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung, “Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 556–562, 2001.

G. Cappellini, Y. P. Ivanenko, R. E. Poppele, and F. Lacquaniti, “Motor patterns in human walking and running,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 3426–3437, 2006.

Y. P. Ivanenko, R. E. Poppele, and F. Lacquaniti, “Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 556, no. 1, pp. 267–282, 2004.

V. C. K. Cheung, A. Turolla, M. Agostini et al., “Muscle synergy patterns as physiological markers of motor cortical damage,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 36, pp. 14652–14656, 2012.

F. Hug, N. A. Turpin, A. Guevel, and S. Dorel, “Is interindividual variability of EMG patterns in trained cyclists related to different muscle synergies?” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1727–1736, 2010.

N. A. Turpin, A. Guevel, S. Durand, and F. Hug, “Fatigue-related adaptations in muscle coordination during a cyclic exercise in humans,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 214, no. 19, pp. 3305–3314, 2011.

J. R. Vaz, B. H. Olstad, J. Cabri, P. L. Kjendlie, P. Pezarat-Correia, and F. Hug, “Muscle coordination during breaststroke swimming: comparison between elite swimmers and beginners,” Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 34, no. 20, pp. 1941–1948, 2016.

K. B. Smale, M. S. Shourijeh, and D. L. Benoit, “Use of muscle synergies and wavelet transforms to identify fatigue during squatting,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 28, pp. 158–166, 2016.

C. Chen, F. Gao, C. Sun, and Q. Wu, “Muscle synergy analysis for stand-squat and squat-stand tasks with sEMG signals,” in Chinese Conference on Biometric Recognition, pp. 545–552, Springer, Cham, 2018.

T. Sato, S. Shigetome, and T. Tokuyasu, “Changes in inter-limb muscle coordination induced by muscle fatigue during pedaling,” ISBS Proceedings Archive, vol. 37, no. 1, p. 153, 2019.

N. Matsunaga, A. Imai, and K. Kaneoka, “Comparison of muscle synergies before and after 10 minutes of running,” Journal of Physical Therapy Science, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1242–1246, 2017.

N. Matsunaga, K. Aoki, and K. Kaneoka, “Comparison of modular control during sidestepping with versus without groin pain,” International Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 17, pp. 114–118, 2019.

N. Matsunaga and K. Kaneoka, “Comparison of modular control during smash shot between advanced and beginner badminton players,” Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, vol. 2018, Article ID 6592357, 6 pages, 2018.

J. Werner, M. Hagglund, M. Walden, and J. Ekstrand, “UEFA injury study. A prospective study of hip and groin injuries in professional football over seven consecutive seasons,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 13, pp. 1036–1040, 2009.

D. M. O’Connora, “Groin injuries in professional rugby league players: a prospective study,” Journal of Sports Science, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 629–636, 2004.

D. Avrahami, “Adductor tendinopathy in a hockey player with persistent groin pain: a case report,” Journal of Canadian Chiropractic Association, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 264–270, 2010.

G. M. Verrall, “Outcome of conservative management of athletic chronic groin injury diagnosed as pubic bone stress injury,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 467–474, 2006.

S. Niga, “Inguinal region hernia changes groin pain syndrome,” Training Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 46-47, 2005.

A. J. Malloch and J. E. Taunton, “Overuse syndromes,” in Endurance in Sport, pp. 766–799, Wiley Online Library, 2nd edition, 2000.

E. M. Sean, N. Ali, S. David, T. John, and M. W. Lawrence, “Hip and groin pain in the professional athlete,” Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, vol. 63, pp. 87–99, 2012.

B. Elliott, “Adolescent overuse sporting injuries: a biomechanical review,” Australian Sports Commission, vol. 23, pp. 1–9, 1990.

W. D. Stanish, “Overuse injuries in athletes: a perspective,” Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise, vol. 16, pp. 1–7, 1984.

M. Boyle, Functional Training for Sports, Functional Training, Bunkodo, Japanese Edition, 2007.

F. Hug, “Can muscle coordination precisely studied by surface electromyography?” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2011.

G. Torres-Oviedo, J. M. Macperson, and L. H. Ting, “Muscle synergy organization is robust across a variety of postural perturbations,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 1530–1546, 2006.

J. H. Viitasalo and P. V. Komi, “Signal characteristics of EMG during fatigue,” European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 1977.

N. K. Vøllestad, “Measurement of human muscle fatigue,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 219–227, 1997.

G. M. Jones and D. G. D. Watt, “Observations on the control of stepping and hopping movements in man,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 219, no. 3, pp. 709–727, 1971.

R. R. Neptune, I. C. Wright, and A. J. Van Den Bogert, “Muscle coordination and function during cutting movements,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 294–302, 1999.

J. Brazier, C. Bishop, C. Simons, M. Antrobus, P. J. Read, and A. N. Turner, “Lower extremity stiffness: effects on performance and injury and implications for training,” Strength & Conditioning Journal, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 103–112, 2014.

Y. Iida, H. Kanehisa, Y. Inaba, and K. Nakazawa, “Activity modulations of trunk and lower limb muscles during impact-absorbing landing,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 602–609, 2011.

M. Hoffren, M. Ishikawa, and P. V. Komi, “Age-related neuromuscular function during drop jumps,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 1276–1283, 2007.

T. Horita, P. Komi, C. Nicol, and H. Kyröläinen, “Interaction between pre-landing activities and stiffness regulation of the knee joint musculoskeletal system in the drop jump: implications to performance,” European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 88, no. 1-2, pp. 76–84, 2002.

M. Santello, “Review of motor control mechanisms underlying impact absorption from falls,” Gait & Posture, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 85–94, 2005.

J. R. Houck, A. Duncan, and E. Kenneth, “Comparison of frontal plane trunk kinematics and hip and knee moments during anticipated and unanticipated walking and side step cutting tasks,” Gait & Posture, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 314–322, 2006.

S. Niga and H. Ikeda, “Groin pain in athletes,” in Sports Injury in Lower Limbs, K. Nakamura, Ed., pp. 164–177, Nakayama Publishing Company, Tokyo, 2011.

P. Holmich, “Long-standing groin pain in sportspeople falls into three primary patterns, a “Clinical entity” approach: a prospective study of 207 patients,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 247–252, 2007.

V. Morelli and V. Smith, “Groin injuries in athletes,” American Family Physician, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 1405–1414, 2001.

P. Malliaras, A. Hogan, A. Nawrocki, K. Crossley, and A. Schache, “Hip flexibility and strength measures: reliability and association with athletic groin pain,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 739–744, 2009.

K. Thorborg, S. Andreas, P. Jesper, M. M. Thomas, M. Peter, and H. Per, “Hip adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite soccer players: implications for clinical evaluation of hip adductor muscle recovery after injury,” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 121–126, 2011.

G. M. Verrall, I. A. Hamilton, J. P. Slavotinek et al., “Hip joint range of motion reduction in sports-related chronic groin injury diagnosed as pubic bone stress injury,” Journal of Science Medicine in Sport, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 2005.

J. F. Crow, A. J. Pearce, J. P. Veale, D. VanderWesthuizen, P. T. Cobum, and T. Pizzari, “Hip adductor muscle strength is reduced preceding and during the onset of groin pain in elite junior Australian football players,” Journal of Science Medicine in Sport, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 202–204, 2010.

J. Mens, H. Inklaar, B. W. Koes, and H. J. Stam, “A new view on adduction-related groin pain,” Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 15–19, 2006.