Steel slag is a byproduct of the steelmaking and steel refining processes. This paper provides an overview of the different types of steel slag that are generated from basic-oxygen-furnace (BOF) steelmaking, electric-arc-furnace (EAF) steelmaking, and ladle-furnace steel refining processes. The mineralogical and morphological properties of BOF and electric-arc-furnace-ladle [EAF(L)] slag samples generated from two steel plants in Indiana were determined through X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analyses and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) studies. The XRD patterns of both BOF and EAF(L) slag samples were very complex, with several overlapping peaks resulting from the many minerals present in these samples. The XRD analyses indicated the presence of free MgO and CaO in both the BOF and EAF(L) slag samples. SEM micrographs showed that the majority of the sand-size steel slag particles had subangular to angular shapes. Very rough surface textures with distinct crystal structures were observed on the sand-size particles of BOF and EAF(L) slag samples under SEM. The characteristics of the steel slag samples considered in this study are discussed in the context of a detailed review of steel slag properties.
The steelmaking industries in the US generate 10–15 million tons of steel slag every year. Approximately 15 to 40% of the steel slag output is initially stockpiled in the steel plants and, eventually, sent to slag disposal sites. Utilization of steel slag in civil engineering applications can alleviate the need for their disposal and reduce the use of natural resources. A better understanding of the properties of steel slag is required for large volumes of this material to be utilized in a technically sound manner in civil engineering applications.
Knowledge of the chemical, mineralogical, and morphological properties of steel slags is essential because their cementitious and mechanical properties, which play a key role in their utilization, are closely linked to these properties. As an example, the frictional properties of steel slag are influenced by its morphology and mineralogy. Similarly, the volumetric stability of steel slag is a function of its chemistry and mineralogy. The chemical, mineralogical, and morphological characteristics of steel slag are determined by the processes that generate this material. Therefore, knowledge of the different types of steelmaking and refining operations that produce steel slag as a byproduct is also required. This paper provides an overview of steel slag generation and a literature review on the chemical and mineralogical properties of steel slags. Moreover, the mineralogical and morphological characteristics of steel slag samples generated from two steel plants in Indiana were evaluated through XRD analyses and SEM studies.
Slags are named based on the furnaces from which they are generated. Figure
Flowchart of iron and steelmaking processes [
The main types of slags that are generated from the iron and steelmaking industries are classified as follow: blast-furnace slag (ironmaking slag), steel-furnace slag, basic-oxygen-furnace (BOF) slag, electric-arc-furnace (EAF) slag, ladle slag.
Basic-oxygen furnaces, which are located at integrated steel mills in association with a blast furnace, are charged with the molten iron produced in the blast furnace and steel scraps. Typically, the proper basic-oxygen furnace charge consists of approximately 10–20% of steel scrap and 80–90% of molten iron [
Figure
Schematic representation of the basic-oxygen furnace process [
Slag resulting from the steelmaking process floats on top of the molten steel. The basic-oxygen furnace is tilted in one direction in order to tap the steel into ladles. The steel produced in the basic-oxygen furnace can either undergo further refining in a secondary refining unit or be sent directly to a continuous caster where semifinished shapes (blooms, billets, or slabs) are solidified in integrated steel mills. After all the steel is removed from the basic-oxygen furnace, it is tilted again in the opposite direction to pour the liquid slag into ladles. The slag generated from a steelmaking cycle is later processed, and the final product after processing is referred to as
Electric-arc furnaces (mini mills) use high-power electric arcs, instead of gaseous fuels, to produce the heat necessary to melt recycled steel scrap and to convert it into high quality steel. The electric-arc furnace steelmaking process is not dependent on the production from a blast furnace since the main feed for it is steel scrap with some pig iron. Electric-arc furnaces are equipped with graphite electrodes and resemble giant kettles with a spout or an eccentric notch on one side. The roof of the electric-arc furnaces can pivot and swing to facilitate the loading of raw materials. Steel scraps, either as heavy melt (large slabs and beams) or in shredded form are separated, graded, and sorted into different classes of steel in scrap yards. Scrap baskets are loaded carefully with different types of scrap according to their size and density to ensure that both the melting conditions in the furnace and the chemistry of the finished steel are within the targeted range [
The electric-arc furnace steelmaking process starts with the charging of various types of steel scrap to the furnace using steel scrap baskets. Next, graphite electrodes are lowered into the furnace. Then, an arc is struck, which causes electricity to travel through the electrodes and the metal itself. The electric arc and the resistance of the metal to this flow of electricity generate the heat. As the scrap melts, the electrodes are driven deeper through the layers of scrap. In some steel plants, during this process, oxygen is also injected through a lance to cut the scrap into smaller sizes. As the melting process progresses, a pool of liquid steel is generated at the bottom of the furnace. CaO, in the form of burnt lime or dolomite, is either introduced to the furnace together with the scrap or is blown into the furnace during melting. After several baskets of scraps have melted, the refining metallurgical operations (e.g., decarburization and dephosphorization) are performed. During the steel refining period, oxygen is injected into the molten steel through an oxygen lance. Some iron, together with other impurities in the hot metal, including aluminum, silicon, manganese, phosphorus, and carbon, are oxidized during the oxygen injections. These oxidized components combine with lime (CaO) to form slag. As the steel is refined, carbon powder is also injected through the slag phase floating on the surface of the molten steel, leading to the formation of carbon monoxide. The carbon monoxide gas formed causes the slag to foam, thereby increasing the efficiency of the thermal energy transfer. Once the desired chemical composition of the steel is achieved, the electric-arc furnace is tilted, and the slag and steel are tapped out of the furnace into separate ladles. Steel is poured into a ladle and transferred to a secondary steelmaking station for further refining. The molten slag is carried to a slag-processing unit with ladles or slag pot carriers [
In electric-arc furnaces, up to 300 tons of steel can be manufactured per cycle (a cycle takes one to three hours to complete). Initially, the EAF steelmaking process was more expensive than the BOF process and, hence, it was only used for production of high quality steels. However, as the size of the electric-arc furnaces increased over the years, the EAF steelmaking process has become competitive in the production of different grades of steel and has started to dominate the US steel industry with a 55% share of the total steel output in 2006, according to USGS [
After completion of the primary steelmaking operations, steel produced by the BOF or EAF processes can be further refined to obtain the desired chemical composition. These refining processes are called secondary steelmaking operations. Refining processes are common in the production of high-grade steels. The most important functions of secondary refining processes are final desulfurization, degassing of oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen, removal of impurities, and final decarburization (done for ultralow carbon steels). Depending on the quality of the desired steel, molten steel produced in the EAF and BOF process goes through some or all of the above mentioned refining processes [
Schematic representation of the electric-arc-furnace steelmaking and ladle refining process [
Ladle furnaces, which look like smaller versions of EAF furnaces, also have three graphite electrodes connected to an arc transformer used to heat the steel. Typically, the bottom of the ladle furnace has a pipeline through which argon gas is injected for stirring and homogenization of the liquid steel in the furnace. By injecting desulfurizing agents (such as Ca, Mg, CaSi, CaC2) through a lance, the sulfur concentration in the steel can be lowered to 0.0002% [
Both BOF and EAF slags are formed during basic steelmaking operations, as explained above. Therefore, in general, the chemical and mineralogical compositions of BOF and EAF slags are similar. Calcium oxide and iron oxide are the two major chemical constituents of both EAF and BOF slags. Ladle slag is generated during the steel refining processes in which several alloys are added to the ladle furnace to produce different grades of steel. For this reason, the chemical constituents of ladle slag differ from those of BOF and EAF slags. Table
Chemical composition of BOF, EAF, and Ladle Slags.
Oxide composition (%) | |||||||||||||
Reference | Slag type | CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | MgO | FeO | Fe2O3 | Fe total | SO3 | MnO | TiO2 | P2O5 | Free CaO |
Das et al. [ | BOF | 47.9 | 12.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 26.3 | — | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | — | 3.3 | — |
Juckes [ | BOF | 36.4–45.8 | 10.7–15.2 | 1–3.4 | 4.1–7.8 | — | — | 19–24 | 0.1–0.2 | 2.7–4.3 | — | 1–1.5 | 2.5–12 |
Mahieux et al. [ | BOF | 47.5 | 11.8 | 2.0 | 6.3 | — | 22.6 | — | — | 1.9 | 0.5 | 2.7 | — |
Poh et al. [ | BOF | 52.2 | 10.8 | 1.3 | 5.04 | 17.2 | 10.1 | — | — | 2.5 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 10.2 |
Shen et al. [ | BOF | 39.3 | 7.8 | 0.98 | 8.56 | — | 38.06 | — | 0.0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | — | — |
Shi [ | BOF | 30–55 | 8–20 | 1–6 | 5–15 | 10–35 | — | — | 0.1–0.2 | 2–8 | 0.4–2 | 0.2–2 | — |
Tossavainen et al. [ | BOF | 45.0 | 11.1 | 1.9 | 9.6 | 10.7 | 10.9 | — | — | 3.1 | — | — | — |
Waligora et al. [ | BOF | 47.7 | 13.3 | 3.0 | 6.4 | — | 24.4 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 9.2 | ||
Xuequan et al. [ | BOF | 45–60 | 10–15 | 1–5 | 3–13 | 7–20 | 3–9 | — | — | — | — | 1–4 | — |
Barra et al. [ | EAF | 29.5 | 16.1 | 7.6 | 5.0 | — | 32.56 | — | 0.6 | 4.5 | 0.78 | 0.6 | — |
Luxán et al. [ | EAF | 24.4 | 15.4 | 12.2 | 2.9 | 34.4 | — | — | — | 5.6 | 0.56 | 1.2 | — |
Manso et al. [ | EAF | 23.9 | 15.3 | 7.4 | 5.1 | — | — | 42.5 | 0.1 | 4.5 | — | — | 0.5 |
Shi [ | EAF | 35–60 | 9–20 | 2–9 | 5–15 | 15–30 | — | — | 0.1–0.2 | 3–8 | — | 0.0–0.3 | — |
Tossavainen et al. [ | EAF | 38.8 | 14.1 | 6.7 | 3.9 | 5.6 | 20.3 | — | — | 5 | — | — | — |
Tsakiridis et al. [ | EAF | 35.7 | 17.5 | 6.3 | 6.5 | — | 26.4 | — | — | 2.5 | 0.8 | — | — |
Nicolae et al. [ | Ladle | 49.6 | 14.7 | 25.6 | 7.9 | 0.44 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.8 | 0.4 | — | 0.2 | — |
Shi [ | Ladle | 30–60 | 2–35 | 5–35 | 1–10 | 0–15 | — | — | 0.1–1 | 0–5.0 | — | 0.1–0.4 | — |
Qian et al. [ | Ladle | 49.5 | 19.59 | 12.3 | 7.4 | — | 0.9 | — | — | 1.4 | — | 0.4 | 2.5 |
Setién et al. [ | Ladle | 50.5–57.5 | 12.6–19.8 | 4.3–18.6 | 7.5–11.9 | — | 1.6–3.3 | — | 0.4–0.5 | 0.3–0.9 | 0–0.01 | 3.5–19 | |
Tossavainen et al. [ | Ladle | 42.5 | 14.2 | 22.9 | 12.6 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.4 | — | 0.2 | — | — | — |
aThe range of values are compiled based on the chemical composition data from 4 different sources in Great Britain provided by Juckes [
bXuequan et al. [
— = data not available.
The main chemical constituents of the basic-oxygen-furnace slag are CaO, FeO, and SiO2. During the conversion of molten iron into steel, a percentage of the iron (Fe) in the hot metal cannot be recovered into the steel produced. This oxidized iron is observed in the chemical composition of the BOF slag. Depending on the efficiency of the furnace, the iron oxide (FeO/Fe2O3) content of BOF slag can be as high as 38% (refer to Table
EAF slag has a chemical composition similar to that of BOF slag (refer to Table
Information on the chemical composition of ladle slags (LS) is limited in the literature. During the steel refining process, different alloys are fed into the ladle furnace in order to obtain the desired steel grade. Hence, the chemical composition of ladle slag is highly dependent on the grade of steel produced. As a result, compared to BOF and EAF slags, the chemical composition of ladle slag is highly variable. Typically, the FeO content of ladle slag is much lower (<10%) than that of EAF and BOF slags. On the other hand, the Al2O3 and CaO contents are typically higher for ladle slags (refer to Table
Crystal formation is a function of both the chemical composition of the melt and its cooling rate. Silica rich blast-furnace slag vitrifies (forms a glassy phase) easily when it is rapidly cooled. Steel slag has a lower silica content than blast-furnace slag and, hence, steel slag seldom vitrifies even when rapidly cooled. Tossavainen et al. [
Several researchers studied the mineralogical composition of steel slags. X-ray diffraction analysis of steel slag samples shows a complex structure with many overlapping peaks reflecting the crystalline phases present in steel slag. These crystalline phases appear to be mainly due to the chemical composition of steel slag and the slow cooling rate applied during processing [
Mineralogical phases of BOF, EAF, and ladle slags.
Reference | Slag | Mineralogical phases |
---|---|---|
Barra et al. [ | EAF | CaCO3, FeO, MgO, Fe2O3, Ca2Al(AlSiO7), Ca2SiO4 |
Geiseler [ | — | 2CaO·SiO2, 3CaO·SiO2, 2CaO·Fe2O3, FeO, (Ca, Fe)O (calciowustite), (Mg, Fe)O (magnesiowustite), free MgO, CaO |
Juckes [ | BOF | C3S, C2S, C2F, RO phase (FeO-MgO-CaO-FeO), MgO, CaO |
Luxán et al. [ | EAF | Ca2SiO5, Ca2Al(AlSiO7), Fe2O3, Ca14Mg2(SiO4)8, MgFe2O4, Mn3O4, MnO2 |
Manso et al. [ | Ladle | Al2O4Mg, Ca(OH)2, Si2O6CaMg, MgO, Ca3SiO5, |
Nicolae et al. [ | BOF | 2CaO·Al2O3·SiO2, Fe2O3, CaO, FeO |
Nicolae et al. [ | EAF | MnO2, MnO, Fe2SiO4, Fe7SiO10 |
Nicolae et al. [ | Ladle | CaO·SiO2, CaOAl2O3·2SiO2, CaS, Al2O3 |
Qian et al. [ | EAF | |
Qian et al. [ | Ladle | |
Reddy et al. [ | BOF | 2CaO·Fe2O3, 2CaO·P2O5, 2CaO·SiO2, CaO |
Reddy et al. [ | BOFq | 2CaO·Fe2O3, 3CaO·SiO2, 2CaO·SiO2, Fe2O3 |
Tossavainen et al. [ | Ladle | Ca12Al14O33, MgO· |
Tossavainen et al. [ | BOF | |
Tossavainen et al. [ | EAF | Ca3Mg(SiO4)2, |
Tsakiridis et al. [ | EAF | Ca2SiO4, 4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3, Ca2Al(AlSiO7), Ca3SiO5, 2CaO·Al2O3·SiO2, FeO, Fe3O4, MgO, SiO2 |
Wachsmuth et al. [ | BOF | Ca2SiO4, Ca3SiO5, FeO, 2CaO·Fe2O3 |
qquenched; — = type of slag not provided.
The common mineral phases present in steel slags include merwinite (3CaO·MgO·2SiO2), olivine (2MgO·2FeO·SiO2),
Due to the presence of unstable phases in its mineralogy, steel slags can show volumetric instability, caused mainly by the presence of free CaO. In the presence of water, free lime hydrates and forms portlandite (Ca(OH)2). Portlandite has a lower density than CaO and, hence, hydration of free CaO results in volume increase. Ramachandran et al. [
Gravel-size steel slag particle with a lime pocket (photograph taken at Mittal Steel, Indiana Harbor West Plant).
Other expansive compounds, such as free MgO, may also be present in steel slag. Unlike CaO, free MgO hydrates at a much slower rate, causing significant volume changes for months or even years. In general, slags generated from modern steelmaking technologies have low MgO content. However, if dolomite (CaMg(CO3)2) is used as a fluxing agent instead of lime, the free MgO content in steel slag increases and, therefore, the possibility of volumetric expansion due to hydration of MgO increases as well [
Another reaction that causes volumetric expansion involves the dicalcium silicate (C2S) phase. The C2S phase is commonly present in all types of steel slags and, in particular, is abundant typically as the main phase in ladle slags. C2S exists in four well-defined polymorphs:
The chemical composition, mineralogy, and morphology of steel slag particles can influence both the cementitious characteristics and mechanical properties of steel slag. Two different types of steel slag (BOF and EAF ladle slags) generated from Indiana steel plants were considered in this study.
Mittal Steel, Indiana Harbor Works West Plant, which is located in Highland, Indiana, was the source plant for the BOF slag. Multiserv Ltd., Harsco Corporation, which performs slag processing operations at the Mittal Steel Plant, supplied representative samples of BOF slag consisting of particles smaller than 15 mm. The Whitesville Steel Mill at Nucor Steel, which is located in Crawfordsville, Indiana, was the source for the EAF ladle (L) slag. The Edward C. Levy Co., which operates at the Whitesville Steel Mill, supplied The EAF(L) slag. This slag is referred to as EAF(L) slag, as it is the ladle slag generated from the refining of the steel from the electric-arc furnace. Edward C. Levy Co. provided representative samples of EAF(L) slag consisting of particles smaller than 9.5 mm.
The oxide composition of both the BOF slag and EAF(L) samples was determined by the slag processing companies (Multiserv and Edward C. Levy Co.) using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis. In order to determine the mineralogical phases present in the steel slag samples, X-ray diffraction analyses were carried out on both BOF slag and on EAF(L) slag samples with a Siemens D-500 diffractometer using copper radiation. Representative oven-dried steel slag samples (with both gravel-size and finer particles) were crushed until a powder passing the No. 200 (0.075 mm opening) sieve was attained. The powder samples were step-scanned from 5 to 65° (
Steel slag particles were subjected to microscopic examination to characterize their shape, angularity, and surface texture. The examination was performed with a scanning electron microscope (manufactured by ASPEX, Model Personal SEM) and a light microscope (manufactured by Nikon). The shape and surface texture of the gravel-size particles were visible to the naked eye. The medium sand-size particles were examined under the light microscope. Finer sand and silt-size particles were examined under the SEM. To prevent charging of the steel slag particles, they were coated with palladium with the Hummer 6.2 sputtering system. The coated steel slag particles were examined on a two-sided copper tape. The SEM images were captured on both photomicrographs and digital files.
Table
Chemical composition of BOF slag.
Oxides | % (by weight) |
---|---|
CaO | 39.40 |
FeO | 30.23 |
SiO2 | 11.97 |
MgO | 9.69 |
MnO | 2.74 |
Al2O3 | 2.16 |
P2O5 | 1.00 |
TiO2 | 0.40 |
Na2O | 0.25 |
Cr2O3 | 0.20 |
K2O | 0.05 |
Cl | 0.01 |
SO3 | 0.12 |
L.O.I.a | 1.80 |
aL.O.I: Loss on ignition.
The XRD patterns of the BOF slag samples were very complex, with several overlapping peaks resulting from the many minerals present in the samples (see Figure
X-ray diffraction pattern for BOF slag.
Table
Mineralogical phases identified in BOF slag based on XRD analyses.
Mineral type | Formula | BOF slag |
---|---|---|
Portlandite | Ca(OH)2 | major |
Srebrodol'skite | Ca2Fe2O5 | major |
Merwinite | Ca3Mg(SiO4)2 | major |
Larnite | Ca2SiO4 | minor |
Calcite (manganoan) | (Ca, Mn)CO3 | minor |
Lime | CaO | minor |
Dolomite | CaMg(CO3)2 | minor |
Wollastonite | CaSiO3 | probable |
Periclase | MgO | probable |
Pentahydrite | MgSO4·5H2O | probable |
Monticellite | CaMgSiO4 | probable |
Hematite | Fe2O3 | probable |
Magnesite | MgCO3 | probable |
Figure
Gravel-size BOF slag particles.
Figures
SEM micrographs of BOF slag sample. (a) particle shape and (b) surface texture and elemental analysis.
Table
Chemical composition of EAF(L) slag.
Oxides | % (by weight) |
---|---|
CaO | 47.52 |
Al2O3 | 22.59 |
FeO | 7.61 |
MgO | 7.35 |
SiO2 | 4.64 |
SO3 | 2.28 |
MnO | 1.00 |
Cr2O3 | 0.37 |
TiO2 | 0.33 |
P2O5 | 0.09 |
Na2O | 0.06 |
K2O | 0.02 |
Zn | 0.01 |
L.O.Ia | 6.20 |
aL.O.I: Loss on ignition.
Shi [
X-ray diffraction patterns for EAF(L) slag.
Table
Mineralogical phases identified in EAF(L) slag based on XRD analyses.
Mineral type | Formula | EAF(L) slag |
---|---|---|
Portlandite | Ca(OH)2 | major |
Mayenite | Ca12 Al14O33 | major |
Larnite | Ca2SiO4 | minor |
Lime | CaO | minor |
Uvavorite | Ca3·Cr2(SiO4)3 | minor |
Wollastonitef | (Ca, Fe)SiO3 | minor |
Periclase | MgO | minor |
Calcite | CaCO3 | probable |
Merwinite | Ca3Mg(SiO4)2 | probable |
fferroan.
Figure
Gravel-size EAF(L) slag particles.
SEM micrographs of EAF(L) slag. (a) sand- and silt-size particle shapes (magnification = 50X) and (b) particles with their elemental analysis.
SEM micrograph showing the surface texture of a sand-size EAF slag particle (magnification = 1200X).
The mineralogical and morphological properties of BOF and EAF(L) slag samples generated from two steel plants in Indiana were investigated through XRD analyses and SEM studies. The following conclusions were reached. The main mineral phases identified in the BOF slag samples were Portlandite, srebrodol’skite, and merwinite. Most of the BOF slag gravel-size particles had a high sphericity and a solid structure. Sand- and silt-size BOF slag particles had subrounded to angular shapes and rough surface textures under SEM. The main mineral phases identified in the EAF(L) slag samples were portlandite, mayenite, and malenterite. Both bulky and platy gravel-size particles with very low sphericity and sharp edges were observed in the EAF(L) slag samples. Sand- and silt-size particles of EAF(L) slag samples showed subrounded to subangular shapes. SEM micrographs showed that the majority of the sand-size particles had extremely rough surface textures with distinct crystal structures. The morphological studies suggest that both the BOF and EAF(L) slag samples tested in this study have favorable frictional characteristics. The complex XRD patterns of the tested BOF and EAF(L) slag samples were a result of their chemical composition and the very slow cooling conditions applied during their processing. The XRD analyses of both the BOF and EAF(L) slag samples indicated the presence of free MgO and CaO. Since these compounds expand when hydrated, the volumetric instability of the tested steel slags needs to be assessed for their use in civil engineering applications.
This work was supported by the Joint Transportation Research Program administered by the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) and Purdue University, Edw. C. Levy Co., and Multiserv Ltd., Harsco Corporation. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the writers, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents neither necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Indiana Department of Transportation, nor do the contents constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The writers are thankful to John Yzenas of Levy Co., and Nayyar Siddiki of INDOT for their support during this project.