Importance-Performance Analysis of Prefabricated Building Sustainability: A Case Study of Guangzhou

In the era of sustainability as the development concept, prefabricated buildings have gradually become an important way to achieve sustainable development of the construction process due to the advantages of high construction speed, energy-saving, and environmental protection. In order to make the prefabricated building develop in a sustainable direction, it is necessary to understand the importance and performance of the critical sustainability aspects of the prefabricated building. However, the existing research has not fully explored this point, and classiﬁcation research on all aspects of sustainability according to the management priorities of sustainable development is lacking. The present study determines the critical sustainability characterization items (criteria) of prefabricated buildings and uses the importance-performance analysis (IPA) method to explore the sustainability importance and performance level of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou on the basis of the three dimensions of economic, social, and ecological sustainability. In particular, this study revises the traditional IPA method and uses the comprehensive weight obtained by the analytical network process- (ANP-) entropy weight method to obtain the importance of items. Results show that items “environmental protection” and “construction civilization” are of high importance and perform well. “Construction cost” and “product quality” are considered high-importance items with relatively poor performance; that is, these areas require urgent improvement actions. The “policy support” item at the intersection of IPA coordinates is also an aspect worthy of attention and discussion. This study provides a useful reference for decision-makers and relevant personnel on determining the priority of project management and achieving the optimal allocation of resources to promote the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings.


Introduction
e construction industry significantly impacts the economy, society, and ecology globally [1,2]. e industry is also always accompanied by a high proportion of energy consumption [3], which significantly impacts sustainable development. e report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change indicated that buildings account for approximately 40% of global energy consumption [4]. Approximately 40% of energy consumption and 36% of carbon dioxide emissions in the EU come from buildings [5]. Over the past decade, construction activity in China has increased significantly, especially in terms of construction area; the resulting construction and demolition waste has reached approximately 1.55 to 2.4 billion tons in China [6]. erefore, shifting from traditional construction methods to sustainable ones is necessary [7]. In particular, the increase in people's awareness of environmental pollution and the accompanying social problems has facilitated the acceptance of the idea of sustainable construction by the construction industry [8,9].
In response to the development of sustainable construction, the construction industry has paid increasing attention to the use of modular prefabrication in recent years. Prefabrication can overcome the shortcomings of traditional construction methods and is considered an effective method to reduce construction waste from the source [10,11]. Prefabrication refers to assembling structural components at a factory or other manufacturing sites and transporting complete components or subcomponents to the construction site where the structure is located [12]. Compared with the traditional cast-in-place construction, the prefabricated building is a large-scale production method. It transfers part of the traditional site construction work to the factory for completion [13] and brings various advantages, such as shortening construction time, improving quality, saving resources, and reducing environmental pollution [14][15][16][17][18]. Prefabricated buildings have been widely accepted as an alternative to traditional cast-in-place structures because of their advantages [19]. As a result, prefabricated buildings become an inevitable trend in the future development of the construction industry.
In past research, the sustainability of prefabricated buildings has been studied in different aspects. Some scholars have investigated the sustainability performance evaluation of prefabricated buildings [20,21]. In addition, many studies have shown the results of analysis of affecting factors of the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings [22,23]. However, these studies mainly focus on the environmental sustainability of prefabricated buildings, while the economic and social sustainability studies are relatively lacking. e triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability standards in all dimensions should be fully considered in the sustainable development of the entire prefabricated building [24]. Moreover, few studies have comprehensively considered the importance and performance of the sustainability of prefabricated buildings. Attitude and awareness are the prerequisites for sustainable development actions [25,26]. If we do not pay attention to certain sustainability aspects of prefabricated buildings, then this aspect may not perform well.
erefore, in the research of the sustainability of prefabricated buildings, the following questions need to be paid attention to: what aspects are attached with importance to the sustainability of prefabricated buildings? What is the current performance of prefabricated building construction in all aspects of sustainability? However, the existing research rarely reviews the importance views and performance levels of critical sustainability aspects (including economic, social, and environmental aspects) of prefabricated buildings, and the interdependence among criteria is ignored. ese studies cannot determine the critical sustainability aspects that require management actions (such as the aspects of high importance but the worst performance). It lacks proper classification according to management priorities and cannot determine effective ways to promote the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings.
To fill these gaps in research, this study identifies critical items that can characterize the sustainability importance and performance level of prefabricated buildings from the perspective of TBL categories, namely, the economic, social, and ecological dimensions. To review the importance and performance level of various sustainability aspects of prefabricated buildings, this study introduces the importance-performance analysis (IPA) method into the field of construction engineering, explores the relationship between the importance and performance of prefabricated buildings in sustainability characterization items, and finds the key development ways. IPA is a useful tool to identify the most critical items related to management behavioral requirements. e criteria involved in the sustainability assessment of prefabricated buildings are usually complex and have different interrelations given that it is a complex decisionmaking issue [27]. erefore, considering the interdependence of criteria in the weighting process is important [28]. Analytical network process (ANP) is a useful method to deal with the interdependency among criteria in complex systems [29]. On this basis, this study attempts to modify IPA technology by taking the comprehensive weight of ANP and entropy weight method as the measurement of the importance of each item to improve the shortcomings of traditional IPA method in the measurement of the importance of the item in IPA technology.
High quality, high efficiency, and sustainable development are receiving unprecedented attention [30], and the production mode involving the installation of prefabricated components is still new for developing countries, such as China [31]. erefore, the sustainable research of prefabricated building is important in the development stage of sustainable building. is study explores the importance and performance level of each key sustainability aspect of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou based on the revised IPA method.
is study aims to reveal the importance and performance of various criteria for the sustainability of prefabricated buildings and determine the most important and least important aspects and the performance levels shown in these aspects. is paper proposes targeted development strategies by categorizing these criteria according to management priorities. It can provide theoretical basis and practical guidance for promoting the effective allocation of resources and improving the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings. In addition, the application of IPA technology in this study can also provide a feasible method and idea for future IPA research in the field of construction. e revised IPA technology in this study considers the mutual influence among criteria and sets a reasonable confidence interval, which can be used as an effective tool for identifying key criteria related to management actions.

Literature Review
Prefabricated buildings, which are an important part of construction industrialization, are receiving an increasing attention [32,33]. Previous research has used various terms related to prefabricated buildings, including "prefabricated" [34], "prefabricated concrete building" [35], "industrialized building" [36,37], and "off-site building" [38]. Some research results have shown that the use of the concept of product modularity is beneficial to traditional construction [39]. e emergence of prefabricated buildings helps solve the problems of large energy consumption and serious environmental pollution in traditional cast-in-place buildings [40]. rough the use of standardized design, factory prefabrication, and prefabricated production methods, the building is decomposed and converted from on-site construction to on-site assembly; this way not only can greatly save the construction period but also have outstanding 2 Advances in Civil Engineering performance in improving labor productivity, saving energy, and protecting the environment [41]. erefore, prefabricated building is considered the future of the construction industry [42] and is widely used in many countries as an effective way to help the construction industry pursue sustainable development [43,44].
In past research, many studies have proven that fabricated technology can help improve the sustainable performance of all aspects of the building, including economic, social, and ecological advantages. For example, Boyd et al. [45] enumerated the advantages of off-site construction in terms of construction time, building quality, and occupational health and safety. Tam et al. [46] identified the advantages of using prefabrication in improving the quality of prefabricated products, reducing construction time and costs, and enhancing environmental performance and aesthetics. Cao et al. [47] proven that prefabrication has obvious advantages in terms of material consumption, energy use, and drainage. Wang et al. [48] evaluated the environmental impact of prefabricated and traditional cast-in-place buildings in the building life cycle by using a building with a 40% assembly rate in Japan as a case study. e results showed that the total energy consumption and carbon emissions of prefabricated buildings are 7.54% and 7.17% lower than those of traditional cast-in-place buildings during the entire life cycle. On the issue of building sustainability, the implementation performance evaluation of relevant criteria is an important research content.
After years of research and exploration, many different methods have been developed to quantify and evaluate the sustainability of buildings. Sustainability assessment systems have been used in the construction industry for many years. Sustainability involves three critical dimensions, namely, the environment, economy, and society, also known as the TBL [49]. e built environment and related processes significantly influence the TBL dimension of sustainable development [50]. Sustainability assessments aim to collect and provide information to simplify the decision-making process [51]. e development of assessment methods and corresponding tools is a challenge in academia and practice. An important category of sustainability assessment methods is the sustainable building rating system. Studies have shown that more than 600 sustainability assessment rating systems are currently available worldwide [52]. For example, the LEED developed by the American Green Building Association, BREEAM developed by the British Building Research Center, GBC initiated and led by the Canadian Ministry of Natural Resources, CASBEE of the Japanese Ministry of Environmental Protection, German Ecological Building Guide LNB, and NABERS of Australian Architecture Environmental assessment systems are relatively common assessment systems. Different evaluation systems will vary with different national backgrounds and cultures. Understanding the relationship and importance of the criteria used in these assessment systems is necessary to help practitioners and governments implement measures to encourage sustainable construction [29]. However, the number of studies to explore the relevance and weight of these evaluation criteria is limited. ese sustainability rating systems also expose many shortcomings during use process, such as the complexity and diversity of standards, the bureaucratic evaluation process, and the high use cost [53]. In addition, these assessment tools rarely comprehensively consider multiple aspects of sustainability and generally pay insufficient attention to the economic and social aspects of sustainability [54].
In addition to the abovementioned sustainability assessment systems developed by organizations or institutions, many researchers have adopted various methods to evaluate the sustainable performance of buildings by using principal component analysis, analytic hierarchy process, and other decision-making methods to establish models [54,55]. In recent years, people's understanding of sustainable development of buildings has changed. Initially, emphasis was placed on resource constraints, that is, energy consumption and ways to reduce the impact on the natural environment [56]. Over the past 10 years, research has focused on building and construction technology issues, such as materials, structural components, building technology, and energy power. For example, Braganca et al. [51] proposed the viewpoint of sustainability assessment for the whole building from the current situation of building sustainability assessment, the feasibility study of performance analysis, and the development of building life cycle extension assessment. ey also introduced and discussed the first step of the sustainability assessment method for Portuguese residential buildings. Tsai et al. [57] proposed an evaluation model for selecting green building projects by defining a series of environmental sustainability standards (such as energy efficiency and resource conservation). Wongbumru and Dewancker [58] used a questionnaire for postevaluation, and the information provided by the research results will help improve the sustainability of new building development. Atanda andÖztürk [59] analyzed the frequency data and research results to identify some potential factors that will influence construction practitioners to make the correct decision for selecting and implementing social standards in green building assessment tools. It should be mentioned that sustainable architecture is considered to achieve balanced development in all aspects of the environment, economy, and society [60]. However, many works only focus on environmental issues or only use one or very limited standards to evaluate the sustainable performance of buildings. Most of them focus on the ecological environment, especially on the energy-saving performance of buildings but pay little attention to the economic and social aspects of sustainability.
is situation has led to a single dimension of the study and the lack of comprehensive consideration of multidimensional sustainability aspects.
Related research on the sustainability of prefabricated buildings can be classified into two aspects: one is the sustainability performance evaluation of prefabricated buildings. As with ordinary buildings, many studies have focused on one or a very limited number of criteria to discuss the sustainable benefits of prefabricated buildings. For example, Yong-Woo et al. [61] applied lean and agile ideas to prefabricated building supply chain systems to assess their environmental benefits. Dong et al. [62] compared the Advances in Civil Engineering carbon emissions of precast and cast-in-situ buildings during the construction phase based on the life cycle assessment method and took a residential project in Hong Kong as a case. e results confirmed that the prefabricated construction method can achieve the emission reduction compared with cast-in-place construction method. Mohammad and Kasun [63] studied the environmental performance of prefabricated buildings over their life cycle. ey also provided a comprehensive review of the advantages and challenges of prefabricated building construction methods compared with traditional methods. Liu et al. [64] used a process-based approach to assess carbon emissions during the off-site factory prefabrication manufacturing process and designed a carbon emission benchmark for the energy assessment of prefabricated buildings in China. On the other hand, most research topics are about the analysis of the influencing factors of the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings. Many scholars have explored the influencing factors of the sustainable development of fabricated buildings for its promotion. For example, Li et al. [65] analyzed the constraints on sustainable development of prefabricated buildings from the four aspects of market, economy, policy, and technology. e model revealed the relationship among the factors and identified the key influencing factors. Riduan and Jay [66] explored the improvement of the ecological performance of industrialized building systems and analyzed the potential key sustainable drivers and constraints of prefabricated building applications using the SWOTmethod. Chang et al. [23] analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of prefabricated buildings from the perspective of environmental sustainability and resources, identifying the obstacles to the development of prefabricated buildings. e current research status reveals that many existing studies focus only on unilateral research on the economic, social, and natural sustainability of prefabricated buildings, especially on environmental sustainability. However, sustainability is a complicated combination covering economic, social, and environmental dimensions, which makes the problem more complex [67]. e sustainability aspects of prefabricated buildings should cover the three dimensions of economy, society, and environment to promote their sustainable transformation. Moreover, for the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings, focusing on the most important but relatively poor performance is also necessary to prioritize the allocation of limited resources to the worst performing but important aspects of sustainability. e construction industry significantly impacts the economy, society, and the environment [68]. Understanding and evaluating the importance and performance of prefabricated buildings in terms of sustainability are important to sustainably develop these buildings, but the existing studies have not adequately discussed this issue. On the other hand, the most important step in assessing building sustainability is to develop appropriate sustainability assessment standards [63]. All applicable TBL sustainability standards should be fully addressed throughout the life cycle. Many previous studies do not analyze the sustainable performance level of prefabricated buildings and only focus on the study of a single dimension. erefore, the developed methods are insufficient in the analysis of developing prefabricated buildings with low sustainability to high sustainability. Moreover, the research results focusing on the importance or performance of sustainability indicate that few works comprehensively and simultaneously study the importance and performance evaluation of sustainability in prefabricated buildings. In China, the government has adopted strict measures to promote the development of prefabricated buildings. e policy requires that at least 30% of new buildings must adopt prefabricated construction methods by 2026 [69]. However, the proportion of prefabricated buildings in China's existing building stock is still relatively low, and the buildings are at the initial stage of development [29]. e existing research is insufficient to identify critical sustainability aspects of the development of prefabricated buildings and does not properly categorize various aspects according to management priorities and identify effective ways to promote development. In addition, items with different levels of sustainability performance need to adopt differentiated implementation methods for balancing the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings. erefore, this study comprehensively considers the sustainability of the three dimensions of ecology, economy, and society and regards the interdependence among the evaluation criteria using the revised IPA tools to analyze the importance and performance of the evaluation items for overcoming the shortcomings of the abovementioned research.

Research Framework.
In China's prefabricated building development, only prefabricated building demonstration cities, such as Shenyang, Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen, have a certain scale of industrial chain and base at present. Compared with the few demonstration cities, most cities in China, including Guangzhou, although the development of prefabricated buildings has been gradually carried out, the overall development trend is still relatively slow. is study takes Guangzhou as the representative of most domestic cities and uses the IPA method to study the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings. e research first screens and determines the critical sustainability characterization items of prefabricated buildings through literature analysis and expert interviews. en, IPA is used to analyze the correlation between importance and performance of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou. is study uses the combined weights of ANP method and entropy weight method to measure the importance of items. Finally, some targeted construction opinions on the direction and countermeasures of promoting the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings are proposed on the basis of the results of IPA. Figure 1 illustrates the framework and methodology of this study.

Importance-Performance Analysis.
e IPA technology was originally proposed by Martilla and James [70]; and it is a useful tool for identifying the most critical corporate management behavior needs. It can help decision-makers determine management priorities [71,72], help prioritize improvements, and mobilize and deploy scarce resources where they are most needed [73]. IPA technology is currently a popular management tool and has been greatly welcomed in many fields, such as food, education, banking, healthcare, e-commerce, public administration, and tourism [74][75][76][77]. IPA is easy to apply in various situations and can make strategic recommendations [78]. In the field of architecture, a few scholars have used IPA to study the transition of construction companies to sustainable development [67], sustainable attitudes and performance of construction companies and their employees [68], and China's prefabricated construction risks [79]. Overall, the IPA method has very limited application in the field of construction engineering and has not been effectively used yet. Determining the sustainability aspects that are considered to be the most important, least important, worst performing, and best performing is necessary for the development of prefabricated buildings to promote their sustainability. is study attempts to apply the IPA method to the sustainability research of prefabricated buildings, pay attention to the importance and performance of various items, and seek a more suitable research method for the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings.
In IPA, two-dimensional coordinates are drawn to reflect their relative relationship [80]. e x-axis represents the performance of items, and the y-axis represents the importance of items.
us, the chart is divided into four quadrants.
Quadrant I (Keep Up the Good Work): Importance and performance are high. If the evaluation item locates in this quadrant, it indicates that the item plays an important role in the sustainable performance of prefabricated buildings, with a high contribution value, and is currently developing well. e follow-up development idea is to maintain or promote innovation on the basis of the original. Quadrant II (Concentrate Here): Low performance but high importance. If the evaluation item locates in this quadrant, it indicates that the item plays a significant role in the sustainable performance of prefabricated buildings and has a high contribution value. However, its current status has not reached the performance development expectations. erefore, the items in this quadrant need urgent attention, and focusing on improvement actions in this region will have the greatest impact. Quadrant III (Low Priority): Low performance and importance. If the evaluation item locates in this  Advances in Civil Engineering quadrant, it indicates that the item plays a small role in the sustainable performance of prefabricated buildings, with a low contribution value, and is currently underdeveloped. e items in this quadrant are considered to be relatively less important areas and are not a priority for implementing improvement measures. Quadrant IV (Possible Overkill): High performance but low importance. If the evaluation item locates in this quadrant, it indicates that the item plays a less important role in the sustainable performance of prefabricated buildings and has a low contribution value. However, the item is currently developing well. erefore, improper resource allocation or investing in these items may cause excessive waste.
Although IPA has been used in the research for a long time, its application has some problems. In this study, IPA is modified according to the following three problems: (1) the location of the two-dimensional coordinate center of IPA, (2) the measurement of the importance of the items, and (3) the region division of quadrant edge items. e revised IPA coordinates are shown in Figure 2.
e first question involves the determination of the position of the IPA coordinate center. Determining the optimal position of the coordinate center is a major problem in applying the IPA method [81]. e placement of most IPA center points is divided into two methods: the "scale-centric" and "data-centric" methods. However, past IPA surveys indicate that many respondents tend to overstate the importance and performance scores, which is known as a "cap effect" [82]. As a result, "scale-centric" IPA mapping may not reveal some of the differences between respondents' assessments of importance and performance. To minimize this upper-limit effect, a "data-centric" IPA mapping method is used in this study. e median, which is a measure of central tendency, is theoretically preferable to the average considering that true interval scales may not exist [70]. On the basis of the characteristics of the data obtained in this study, the median intersection of the metrics of importance and performance is taken as the origin of the IPA coordinates. Among them, the measure of importance takes the item weight value calculated on the basis of the ANP-entropy weight method, and the measure of performance takes the average value of each sample measurement. e second question involves the measurement of the importance of items. A measure of the importance of items is meaningful for prioritizing resource allocation [83]. e use of absolute importance rather than relative importance greatly limits the predictive power of the importance measure [84]. Some studies have used more sophisticated methods to directly measure importance, including pairwise comparison methods (such as analytic hierarchy processes). Mouthino et al. [85] considered this method to be broad, flexible, and suitable for deriving numerical measures of the relative importance of decision variables. e treatment of the importance of items in the current study abandons the traditional method of directly measuring with a 5-level Likert scale to more scientifically measure the importance of each item of the sustainability of prefabricated buildings. e ANP-entropy weight method, which can reflect the interaction among criteria, is used as a way to measure the importance of each item for improving the performance of the items in a more profound and targeted manner. e third issue involves the regional division of marginal items. Data representing the performance of the items identify certain areas for improvement and the effectiveness of the organization [83]. Some items may firmly belong to the "Keep Up the Good Work" quadrant; other items may belong to the "Concentrate Here" quadrant but are very close to the "Keep Up the Good Work" quadrant boundary. Traditional IPA cannot distinguish between items assigned to the same quadrant; thus, decision-makers may fail to provide correct management decisions for boundary items [86].
e Tarrant-Smith [87] framework is used in this study to make IPA more sensitive to corresponding changes for addressing the aforementioned issue. For each item, the standard error (SE) of the items' performance value is calculated and then added to the data points on the IPA chart. A horizontally extended confidence interval (CI) is established on the basis of the value of SE, centering on the average value, and the CI is calculated as shown in (1). For item a in Figure 2, the CI for the average performance is within the first quadrant, which indicates that the average value of this item in the figure is a true reflection of the respondents' attitudes. In the case of item b, the CI value of the item spans the area of two quadrants. At this time, decision-makers cannot guarantee that the item will be accurately assigned to a single quadrant: where CI i P represents the CI of performance of item i, u(P i ) is the average performance of item i, S(P i ) represents the standard deviation of performance of item i, and n is the sample number.  Advances in Civil Engineering

ANP-Entropy Weight Method.
e methods for determining the weight of items can be roughly divided into two types: subjective and objective assignment methods [88]. e weight assignment in the subjective weighting method mainly depends on the decision-maker's experience and decision opinions with strong subjectivity and weak objectivity. Although the objective weighting method is based on mathematics, the weight obtained from the actual data of the evaluation matrix may be contrary to the actual importance of the index [89]. is study adopts the combination of ANP and entropy weight method to measure the importance of the item for avoiding too subjective or objective evaluation results and fully considering the interaction among evaluation criteria. is way ensures the minimum impact of the item weight on the evaluation results.
ANP is a subjective weighting method that can calculate the subjective weight of each item. e ANP model can measure all possible interrelationships among criteria while the analytic hierarchy process or rating law cannot [90]. In the case where the research object needs to consider and quantify the correlation among some criteria, ANP provides a more realistic method and better analysis for decisionmaking problems.
is advantage is extremely important [91,92]. e application of ANP mainly includes three main steps: establishing hierarchy model, constructing judgment matrix, and forming supermatrix and final priority [93]. e entropy method is a weighting method with strong objectivity [94]. is study uses the entropy weight method to determine the objective weight of items. Information entropy describes the degree of dispersion of some item data. A great dispersion corresponds to a great impact of the item on the evaluation results and a greater weight of the item [95]. e calculation principle of the entropy weight method is mainly to calculate the entropy weight by obtaining the entropy value [96]. e weight combination formula obtained by modifying the ANP method using the entropy weight method is as follows [97]: where W is the combined weight determined by the ANPentropy weight method, W a i is the weight calculated using the ANP, and W e i is the weight calculated using the entropy weight method.
To achieve the minimum sum of squared deviations of W a i , W e i , and W, the function is established as follows: By combining two formulas, the solution α � 0.5 is obtained without losing generality.

Identification of Critical Sustainability Items.
From the perspective of the TBL, the framework of sustainable development assessment criterion system can be divided into three dimensions of environment, economy, and society [98]. erefore, this study starts from the three dimensions of the TBL to determine the critical sustainability items of prefabricated buildings. is study first uses the literature analysis method to conduct a retrospective analysis of relevant literature in recent years [24,66,[99][100][101][102][103]. By referring to relevant literature and combining the characteristics of prefabricated buildings in China, some preliminary characterization items are extracted and summarized. One of the targets of sustainability evaluation research is to improve the reference value for formulating or implementing policies. erefore, involving knowledgeable and experienced professionals for the selection of criteria is important. us, we conducted a survey on the site of the Youth Palace Project in Nansha District, Guangzhou, and invited five experts with rich experience in the construction of prefabricated buildings to conduct interviews on the selection of characterization items and increased or decreased the items depending on the opinions of the experts. ereafter, the research invited 30 experts in China's construction industry, especially those with prefabricated construction experience, to score on the 5-point Likert scale through online e-mail and offline visit. e vast majority of experts in this survey have extensive professional experience and account for 46.67% of construction units, 20% of owner units, 24.44% of survey and design units, and 8.89% of other units. In general, the mean score of Likert scale with a scale of 1-5 indicates disagreement within the range of 1-2.4, indicates neutrality within the range of 2.5-3.4, and agrees within the range of 3.5-5. To ensure scientific and reasonable selection of items, this study eliminated the two items of "market awareness" and "community environmental satisfaction" with a weighted average score of less than 3.5 in the preliminary selected items. After a series of treatments, the critical sustainability items determined in this study are shown in Table 1, which lists the categories of each item and description of the meaning of the items. A total of 13 critical sustainability characterization items, including 5 items for economic sustainability and social sustainability and 3 items for ecological sustainability, were considered.

Determination of Item Importance Based on ANP-Entropy Weight Method.
In this study, we used the combined item weight values of ANP and entropy weight method to measure the importance of the items required in the IPA method. According to the critical sustainability items determined in Section 4.1, this study considered the sustainability of prefabricated buildings as the overall goal of the model, the three sustainability levels of economy, society, and environment as the criterion level, and the impact items of each criterion layer as the elements. In the network layer, the impact item in each criterion layer was used as an element group. After the correlation among the elements was analyzed, the ANP model diagram constructed is shown in Figure 3. After the ANP model is established, a pairwise Advances in Civil Engineering judgment matrix needs to be established based on the correlation between the elements. en, the obtained comparison data are filled into each judgment matrix to obtain an unweighted supermatrix. e ANP model is a mesh model, and its manual calculation is very complicated and needs to be implemented by computer software. erefore, this study used the Super Decision software to calculate the weighted supermatrix and extreme supermatrix to obtain the subjective weights of each element.
ANP theory was used in this study to develop a questionnaire that meets the needs of the research. e design of the questionnaire was based on the correlation among the items. e importance of each item was compared using a 9level scale method. Questionnaires were selectively sent out to knowledgeable and experienced experts through field surveys of construction projects in Guangzhou (including the Guangzhou International Campus project of South China University of technology, which has the largest prefabricated building area in Guangzhou and meets the A-level evaluation standard) and online mail scholars and technicians to obtain research survey data. Respondents were employees from government, owner, construction, design, consulting, component production, and others, covering engineers, project managers, technicians, and other major workers in the field of engineering. More than 67% of the respondents have been in the construction engineering field for 6 years or more. erefore, the objects of this survey have been in the engineering field for a long time, are familiar with the actual engineering construction, and have rich work experience. However, prefabricated buildings are still in the early stages of development in Guangzhou during the investigation process. Although the relevant personnel have been working in the traditional construction industry for many years, the time to participate in the construction of Guangzhou prefabricated building project is only in recent years. A total of 88 questionnaires were collected in this part of the study, and 70 valid questionnaires were obtained through screening. After the collected data were analyzed, the subjective weight of each evaluation item In the application of the entropy weight method to obtain the objective weight of each evaluation item, the  According to formula (4), the subjective weights of ANP and objective weights of entropy weights were comprehensively calculated. e final summary table of weights of evaluation item is shown in Table 2.

IPA Results.
In terms of performance data acquisition, this study targeted personnel in the field who are familiar with prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou. We sent emails to invite the respondents in the abovementioned survey to conduct a questionnaire survey and asked them to provide some other respondents who belong to the research objectives. According to the clues formed, we used the snowball method to visit the new respondents. e questionnaire has two parts: one is the background information of the interviewees, and the other involves the subjective feelings of the respondents on the sustainable performance of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou, which were measured by a 5-level Likert scale. e scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating that the respondent's evaluation of the sustainability performance of prefabricated buildings is better. A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed in the study, and 224 valid questionnaires were recovered (validation rate of questionnaires � 89.6%). When using Cronbach's α as the criterion for assessing the reliability of the questionnaire, α < 0.30 is unreliable, 0.30 < α < 0.40 indicates low reliability and is only acceptable in preliminary studies, 0.40 < α < 0.50 means slightly reliable, 0.50 < α < 0.70 means reliable (the most common reliable range), 0.70 < α < 0.90 is very reliable (the second most common range of reliability), and 0.90 < α is completely reliable [104]. In this study, Cronbach's α values of the three dimensions of economic sustainability, social sustainability, and environmental sustainability are 0.779, 0.761, and 0.691, respectively. e overall Cronbach's α value is 0.785, which belongs to the range of 0.70 < α < 0.90. erefore, the content of the questionnaire shows high reliability and internal consistency. e results are shown in Table 3. e background information of the interviewees collected from the questionnaire includes gender, age, education level, jobs, construction engineering field employment duration, and prefabricated building participation duration, in which the working years were calculated by rounding (Table 4). Among the 224 respondents, males account for 62.95% of the sample, which accords with the characteristics of the gender proportion in the construction engineering field. Most of the respondents are between the ages of 26 and 45, and the number of undergraduates and above is relatively high. From the perspective of the jobs, the respondents come from different employments, and the distribution ratio is relatively balanced and ranges from 4.02% to 16.96%. In terms of working duration in the construction engineering field, 6-10 years has the most frequency and accounts for 40.18% of the sample, and respondents with 11 years or more of working experience account for 38.84%. erefore, most of the respondents have a long working period in the engineering field and have rich work experience. For the construction time of prefabricated buildings, the proportion of respondents from 1 to 5 years reaches 54.46%, and the total proportion of respondents from 6 years and above reaches 25.01%. ose less than 1 year also occupy 20.54% of the sample. e reason is that prefabricated buildings have only begun to develop in Guangzhou and even throughout China in recent years.
is result also shows that the questionnaire collected in this study can effectively reflect the current situation of the sustainable development of the prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou, which confirms the reliability of the research results to a certain extent. Table 5 shows the results of the IPA using (1) and the Tarrant-Smith framework method (using a 95% CI to set SE for the average performance value of each item), combined with the item comprehensive weights shown in Table 2, and the performance questionnaire survey. Table 5 presents the values of the importance of each item (the comprehensive weight of the item), the average performance of the item, SE, CI, and the TSF results. In the TSF column, "-" represents that no corresponding value exists for the median in the CI of the item; that is, no problem related to the two quadrants exists; "×" represents that a corresponding value exists for the median in the CI of the item, which crosses two quadrants. e results in Table 5 indicate that the overall median values of performance and importance locate on the item C14 "policy support," which are 3.3438 and 0.0577, respectively. erefore, the coordinate origin of the twodimensional graph of IPA should be determined as the coordinate corresponding to the item (3.3438, 0.0577). e two-dimensional IPA established by ordinal correspondence of values representing item performance and importance is shown in Figure 4. e following is a brief analysis of each quadrant according to IPA results. e items in the quadrant are C11 (construction cost) and C21 (product quality). e two items have relatively low performance but high importance. For the "construction cost" item, the weight value is the largest among all items. erefore, improving the performance of the item is particularly urgent, and taking the improvement action for this item will have the greatest promotion effect. According to the Tarrant-Smith framework, the CI of the "product quality" item falls in the first quadrant, and we cannot determine exactly whether the performance of the item is good. However, if viewed conservatively, certain measures also need to be taken to promote the improvement of the quality of construction products for the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings. Quadrant III (Low Priority): e items included in this quadrant are C13 (construction technical difficulty), C15 (investment risk), C24 (quality requirement of workers), and C25 (industrial linkage development). ese items are currently relatively low in performance and importance. erefore, the attributes of the four items are not the areas that should be focused on to promote the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou nor the priority of implementing improvement measures. Quadrant IV (Possible Overkill): e items in this quadrant are C22 (productivity) and C31 (resource consumption). e performance value is high and the development is good at present, but the importance is low. According to the Tarrant-Smith framework, the CI of the item C22 in this quadrant locates in quadrant III. Similarly, we cannot confidently determine the performance level of this item. However, according to the IPA results, if too much attention and investment are made on the item C31, then excessive waste may be generated in the process of promoting the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou.
Notably, the item C14 (policy support) at the origin of the coordinates cannot be classified into any quadrant nor can it be completely separated into four quadrants. e analysis results in the IPA chart indicate that the importance and performance level of the item are in a medium state, and whether the item needs to take action for improvement is difficult to determine. However, the construction of prefabricated buildings in various regions and cities, including Guangzhou, has set off a wave since the country introduced a series of policies. Local governments have taken measures from policy, economy, and industrial technology aspects to increase policy support, research and development investment, and production university research cooperation for promoting the healthy and rapid development of prefabricated buildings [105].

Discussion
Prefabricated buildings are considered by many countries as important solutions for environmental construction and industry [43]. e data of "Forecast 2019: Panorama Map of China's Prefabricated Building Industry" in 2018 indicated that the proportion of prefabricated building areas in China's new construction area is much lower than in the United States, Japan, France, Sweden, and other developed countries. e previous IPA results show the importance and performance of the sustainability of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou and indicate that the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou is not very good. Only some prefabricated building model cities, such as Shenyang, Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen, have a certain scale of industrial chain and base in terms of prefabricated building applications in China. Most domestic cities, including Guangzhou, have a weaker development trend for prefabricated buildings than a small number of model cities. e research on the sustainable performance of prefabricated buildings conducted in this study with Guangzhou as a representative also actually represents the sustainable performance of prefabricated buildings in most cities and regions in China to a certain extent. erefore, the research results are not limited to the prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou but also have certain reference significance to other cities and regions in China.
e previous IPA results show that the items C11 (construction cost) and C21 (product quality) are in the second quadrant, which is of high importance but low performance. Since the CI of C21 mostly locates in quadrant II, for the sake of conservativeness, this item should be placed in this quadrant for analysis. By virtue of the "three-  10 Advances in Civil Engineering factor theory" proposed by Kano et al. [106], C11 and C21 belong to the "fundamental factors" of the three factors. e so-called "basic factors"; that is, if these factors are not satisfied, they will bring dissatisfactory effects; however, if they are satisfied or better than expected, they are not necessarily satisfactory. e negative performance of these factors will have a greater impact on the development level of overall performance than the positive performance. "Basic factors" are prerequisites for the product [107]. erefore, taking management actions to improve the performance of the items "construction cost" and "product quality" is particularly urgent to improve the sustainability level of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou. e item C14 (policy support) at the origin of IPA coordinates also needs special attention. In fact, the policy requiring the implementation of prefabricated buildings has greatly promoted the development of China's prefabricated industry [108]. Although the Chinese government has proposed a series of policies for the development of prefabrication in recent years [109], the implementation of prefabrication in China still lags behind those in other developed countries [110]. Previous studies have shown concerns about potentially high capital costs or even high total costs in prefabricated construction projects [111]. Many studies have shown that the unit cost of prefabricated buildings is estimated to be 2%-17% higher than that of traditional buildings [20,111]. Prefabricated buildings are still in the initial stage of development in China [112]. us, cost issues play an important role in the decision-making process when choosing innovative building methods. is is also the main factor that hinders the construction industry from advancing prefabricated buildings as highlighted in the literature and pilot project research [16,113]. Many consumers think that prefabricated buildings are inferior low-end products; they are also skeptical of prefabricated buildings due to a series of quality problems, such as poor seismic performance and weak thermal insulation performance in the process of developing prefabricated buildings in China [114,115]. e use of prefabricated construction will likely conflict with the project's economic interests, which inevitably reduces the developer's willingness. Because in the construction industry investment market, it is profit-oriented. Projects without profit or even causing losses will affect the investment enthusiasm. Some measures should be taken to solve this problem and promote the sustainable economic development of prefabricated buildings. In recent years, prefabricated buildings have shown a continuous development trend driven by policies [43]. Mao et al. [116] emphasized that the regulations and policies issued by the government have a crucial impact on the widespread application of prefabricated buildings. e government should adopt a positive attitude to formulate strategies and policies for promoting the implementation of prefabricated buildings. Jiang et al. [117] also put forward this opinion and gave a detailed policy system and feasible guidelines to solve the obstacles in the current implementation of prefabricated buildings. However, the construction cost of prefabricated buildings has remained high because of the significant increase in the production and installation costs of prefabricated components [101]. erefore, the development of domestic prefabricated buildings in the current initial stage should be promoted with policy incentives as the guide. For developers, sufficient concessions can be given in terms of land use and taxation to reduce development costs and encourage developers to choose prefabricated construction methods. For manufacturers of prefabricated components, certain subsidy policies can be adopted to encourage largescale production by enterprises. e resulting economies of scale can reduce overall construction costs and improve cost efficiency. For consumers, appropriate economic subsidies can be adopted to increase their willingness to purchase prefabricated houses. Moreover, product quality is also one of the important affecting factors of the development of prefabricated buildings. is factor includes various aspects, the quality of the house, the performance, and the diverse design requirements. Tool-based assistance and automatic control in the manufacturing process should be used to further improve the accuracy of components, reduce the frequency of replacement during the building operation phase, and develop environmentally friendly multiperformance building materials. It will increase the economic benefits of consumer use and facilitate public acceptance by this way. Only when the public accepts the quality of the building, can the developer's willingness and motivation to invest in prefabricated buildings be strengthened to effectively achieve the sustainable and stable development of prefabricated buildings. It is worth mentioning that governments in different regions should adapt to local conditions and improve local policy incentives. Guangzhou, which is one of the few first-tier cities and international business centers in China, has strong talents and scientific and technological resources. e city should take advantage of its strong economy and resource advantages to promote the development of its fabricated buildings.

Conclusion
is study investigates the importance and performance level of the sustainability of prefabricated buildings by taking Guangzhou as a study case. According to the sustainability dimension contained in TBL, this study identifies critical sustainability characterization items for prefabricated buildings. On this basis, this study attempts to amend the IPA method and introduce it into the research of the construction industry by surveying the employees of the relevant fields in prefabricated buildings. IPA provides a simplified method to analyze the importance and performance level of the research object, which helps identify the most critical aspects that require special attention. e ANPentropy weight method can determine the weight of each interacting item under different circumstances of knowledge and experience for obtaining more scientific and comprehensive weight results. e results show that "construction cost" and "product quality" are considered high-importance but low-performance items, which need to be focused on and take measures to promote improvement. e "policy support" item at the intersection of IPA coordinates is also an aspect worthy of attention and discussion. Effective policy incentives will greatly promote the development of domestic prefabricated buildings in China, which is still in the early development stage.
Although this study takes the importance and performance evaluation of the sustainability of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou as an example, the results have certain reference significance and enlightenment for the sustainability evaluation research of prefabricated buildings in other cities in China and other countries as well. e research ideas and results of this study can provide a new reference for the sustainability research methods of prefabricated buildings. e main contributions of the research are as follows: (1) from the perspective of research methods, this study has made various amendments to the IPA method. In particular, the combination of the ANP method that considers the interaction among criteria and the objective entropy weight method is used as a measure of the importance of items. It overcomes the shortcomings of existing research and is applied to the research field of prefabricated buildings. In the current research related to the construction field, IPA has not been widely and effectively applied. Although some research results on the sustainability evaluation of prefabricated buildings are available, measurement of the simultaneous analysis of the importance and performance level of critical items is lacking. is study further shows that the modified IPA method can evaluate and measure the importance and performance level of items and provide management recommendations for each item in the construction field. is study shows an example for future IPA research in the field of construction and provides a feasible method and idea, which helps enrich the current knowledge system. (2) In terms of evaluation results, this study comprehensively considered the sustainability of the three dimensions of TBL (economic, social, and ecological), making up for the deficiencies that most current studies only analyze the sustainability of single or limited dimensions. According to the results of a survey to investigate the importance and performance level of the sustainability of prefabricated buildings in Guangzhou, the critical items that are in urgent need of improvement and the priorities for the implementation of management measures are identified. And the corresponding development countermeasures are proposed on the basis of the evaluation results. is study provides a new research perspective for the sustainable development strategy of future prefabricated buildings. rough this perspective, a theoretical basis can be provided for promoting the sustainable construction and operation management of prefabricated buildings. e related theoretical results and conclusions studied in this work can also provide certain references for decision-makers and construction companies.
e IPA results of the sustainable development of prefabricated buildings in this article can help practitioners and decision-makers in the construction industry understand the sustainability and performance level of prefabricated buildings in each sustainability dimension and under the overall TBL to select sustainable best plan. However, sustainable development is a dynamic process and thus changes over time. It also depends on many parameters, and the regional differences exist among prefabricated construction projects in different places. Prefabricated building is an effective way to promote the industrialization of the construction industry and is also popular in recent years. erefore, further exploring of sustainability evaluation and research methods is still necessary. In the future Advances in Civil Engineering 13 research, more consideration may need to be given to the completeness of sustainability coverage and the balance between applicability and dynamic effectiveness to apply assessment methods and results in more real-time and effective ways.

Data Availability
All data generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
Disclosure is paper is based on a conference paper presented at the Construction Research Congress 2020, Tempe, Arizona, United States.

Conflicts of Interest
e authors declare no conflicts of interest.