Advances in Condensed Matter Physics

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 903239, 9 pages

doi:10.1155/2012/903239

Review Article

Research Progress on Ni-Based Antiperovskite Compounds

P. Tong¹ and Y. P. Sun1,2

¹Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Institute of Solid State Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

²High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

Received 19 September 2012; Accepted 5 December 2012

Academic Editor: Laifeng Li

Copyright © 2012 P. Tong and Y. P. Sun. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The superconductivity in antiperovskite compound MgCNi₃ was discovered in 2001 following the discovery of the superconducting MgB₂. In spite of its lower superconducting transition temperature (8 K) than MgB₂ (39 K), MgCNi₃ has attracted considerable attention due to its high content of magnetic element Ni and the cubic structure analogous to the perovskite cuprates. After years of extensive investigations both theoretically and experimentally, however, it is still not clear whether the mechanism for superconductivity is conventional or not. The central issue is if and how the ferromagnetic spin fluctuations contribute to the cooper paring. Recently, the experimental results on the single crystals firstly reported in 2007 trend to indicate a conventional s-wave mechanism. Meanwhile many compounds neighboring to MgCNi₃ were synthesized and the physical properties were investigated, which enriches the physics of the Ni-based antiperovskite compounds and help understand the superconductivity in MgCNi₃. In this paper, we summarize the research progress in these two aspects. Moreover, a universal phase diagram of these compounds is presented, which suggests a phonon-mediated mechanism for the superconductivity, as well as a clue for searching new superconductors with the antiperovskite structure. Finally, a few possible scopes for future research are proposed.

1. Introduction

To explore new superconductors is one of the central issues of material science and condensed matter physics. The discovery of high-temperature (high-) superconductivity in cuprates has attracted a lot of attention in the past decades [1]. In 2001, Professor R. J. Cava from the University of Princeton reported the superconductivity in antiperovskite compound MgCNi₃ with the transition temperature  K (Figure 1) [2]. The superconductivity in MgCNi₃ is unusual in view of the large content of the magnetic element Ni, which often favors a magnetic ground state. A prominent feature of the electronic structure is an extended van Hove singularity as shown in Figure 2(a), giving rise to a large density of states (DOS) just below the Fermi level () [see Figure 2(b)] [3]. A similar feature has been observed in some high- superconductors. Moreover, the DOS peak is mainly attributive to the Ni 3d states [4, 5]. Structurally, the cubic symmetry recalls the high- cuprates superconductors with perovskite structures. Thus the central question was raised, whether the superconductivity in MgCNi₃ is exotic. In other words, the answer to the question lies in clarifying the roles of the spin fluctuations or ferromagnetic (FM) correlations probably from the dominant Ni content in MgCNi₃. However, the experimental results based on polycrystalline samples by different techniques (such as NMR [6], London penetration depth [7, 8], critical current behavior [9], tunneling spectra [10, 11], carbon isotope effect [12],specific heat [13, 14], μSR [15] and so on) from different groups are controversial. A detailed summary on the experimental and theoretical results published before 2004 can be found in the review paper [16] written by Mollah. From then on, the researchers have been focusing on two main scopes in this field, namely, the experimental investigations on MgCNi₃ single crystals and on the synthesis and physical properties of neighbor compounds of MgCNi₃, which have never been included in any review papers. In this paper, we focus on these two topics, as well as give a phase diagram based on the available data of the lattice constant, the Debye temperature and the density of state at the Fermi level, , for the Ni-based antiperovskite compounds. The phase diagram supports that the superconductivity observed in the Ni-based antiperovskite compounds is rather phonon-mediated than unconventional. The phase diagram also helps explore new superconductors in Ni-based antiperovskite compounds. Some possible future research scopes were proposed in the end of this paper.

Figure 1: The temperature-dependent resistivity for polycrystalline MgCNi₃ [Adapted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature. He et al., Nature, 411, 6833 (2001), copyright 2001]. The up and low insets show the antiperovskite crystal structure and superconducting transition, respectively.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: (a) Surface plot (and contour plot below) of the van Hove singularity in (relative to ) in the G-M-X plane, with at the right-hand corner (planar coordinates are given in units of 2π/a) [Reprinted with permission from H. Rosner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 027001 (2002)]. (b) The peak structure in the electronic density of state around [Reprinted with permission from D. J. Singh et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 140507 (2001)].

2. Experimental Results on Single Crystalline MgCNi₃

The experiments on single crystal are desirable for eliminating the discrepancies in the experimental results based on polycrystalline samples. However, the first, also the only successful synthesis of MgCNi₃ single crystal up to date, was reported in 2007 [17] by Lee et al., five years after the discovery of superconductivity in polycrystalline MgCNi₃.

In [17], Lee et al. employed a self-flux method with the aid of high pressure. The mixtures of Mg, C, and Ni powders with the ratio 1 : 1 : 3 were ground, pressed into a pellet, and then loaded into a high pressure cell. Then the sample was heated at 1200°C under 4.25 GPa for 12 hours. The resulted sample is a mixture of single crystalline MgCNi₃ with the size of hundreds of micrometers and some fluxes. Unlike the polycrystalline samples, the single crystal does not contain C or Mg deficiencies. Instead, Ni is found to be deficient. The real composition turns out to be . As displayed in Figure 3, the transition temperature is found to be 6.7 K, slightly lower than the for polycrystalline MgCNi₃. Even so, the entire sample quality was greatly improved compared with the crystalline samples. For example, the residual resistivity ratio is 2.7, larger than the values ever reported for the crystalline samples. Moreover, the single crystal was homogeneous and free of microscopic regular arrays observed in the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images for polycrystalline samples [17].

Figure 3: (Color online) Temperature-dependent resistivity of MgCNi2.8 [Reprinted with permission from H. -S. Lee et al., Adv. Mater. 19, 1807-1809 (2007)]. The sample with four metallic leads is shown in the upper inset. The lower inset shows a magnified view of near the superconducting transition.

In order to clarify the nature of the superconductivity in single crystal MgCNi₃, further measurements have been performed on the samples from Lee’s group. Based on the resistance measured as functions of the temperature and the applied magnetic field, it is found that the normal state resistivity can be explained by using only electron-phonon (e-p) scattering mechanism, indicating a conventional BCS behavior [18]. It is further supported by the linear behavior of near . The low-temperature electronic specific heat in superconducting state shows a classical exponential decrease confirming s-wave pairing with a moderate e-p coupling in this material [19, 20]. However, the at normal state cannot be well described by the usual term of phonon contribution. A higher phonon-term probably due to the softening of the lowest acoustic Ni phonon modes is needed to interpret the deviation [20]. It is consistent with the magnetic penetration depth measured by high-precision tunnel diode oscillator technique and Hall probe magnetization, which shows that the superconducting gap is fully open over the whole Fermi surface [21]. Moreover, the ratio 2Δ/ and high specific-heat jump at in zero field, ΔC, indicating a strong-coupling mechanism. This scenario is supported by the direct gap measurements via the point-contact spectroscopy [20]. The reported superconducting parameters are summarized in Table 1. The availability of single crystal specimens also allows a detailed phonon-dispersion mapping which is closely related to the superconducting mechanism. By applying inelastic X-ray scattering (IXS), the phonon mapping was reported by Hong et al. [22]. The IXS result implies that there are no phonon anomalies that could support any exotic mechanisms for superconductivity in MgCNi₃. This result was verified by a late ab initio calculation [23]. In addition, Jang et al. [24] observed the collapse of the peak effect (PE), namely a sudden increase in the critical current near the end of superconductivity. As the AC driving frequency increases, the PE was collapse and observable flux creep was developed in contrast to the result observed in the well-studied NbSe₂. Also, the PE in MgCNi₃ was suggested be a dynamic phenomenon.

Table 1: The lattice constant a, superconducting transition temperature , low critical field , up critical field , coherence length (0), penetration depth (0), Ginzgurg-Landau parameter (0), electronic specific heat coefficient (Sommerfeld constant) , Debye temperature , coupling ratio 2/, and the density of state at the Fermi level , N(), for the Ni-based antiperovskite superconductors. The parameters are mainly from [41]. The parameters under the “/” are for MgCNi₃ single crystal from [17–20]. The values of N() are from theoretical calculations reported in [4, 28, 42].

MgCNi₃
CdCNi₃
ZnNNi₃

(Å)
3.812/3.8125
3.844
3.756

(K)
7.6/7.3
3.2
3

(mT)
10
8.6
6.9

(T)
14.4/12.8
2.2
0.96

(0)
46/51
122
185

(0) (Å)
2480/2300
2767
3089

(0)
54/44
23
17

(mJmol⁻¹ K⁻²)
30.1
18
13

(K)
284/132
352
336

2/
(3.75–5)/4
—
—

() 

(states eV⁻¹/f·u)
4.99
3.82
2.813

Although the experimental results measured on the single crystal samples suggest that MgCNi₃ is a conventional BCS-type superconductor with mediate or strong e-p coupling, it is yet arbitrary to exclude the contribution from spin fluctuations or FM instability. The reason is relative to the single crystalline sample itself. All the experiments were performed on the crystals prepared by the same group. Moreover, the crystal is Ni-deficient [17] though its superconducting parameters are close to those determined on polycrystalline samples (see Table 1). Theoretically, for another Ni-based antiperovskite compound InCNi₃, it is proved that the excess of Ni, or say, deficiency of In can tune the system to the FM instability [25], even to a FM order [26]. It is natural to expect stronger spin-fluctuations given a perfectly stoichiometric MgCNi₃ single crystal. Therefore, a theoretical comparison between the Ni-deficient and perfect MgCNi₃ would resolve the problem. Moreover, growth of single crystals without Ni deficiencies is needed to end the ten-year debate on whether MgCNi₃ is unconventional superconductor.

3. Research Progress on Ni-Based Antiperovskite Compounds other than MgCNi₃

The purpose of investigating the materials which are closely related to MgCNi₃, that is, AXNi₃ (A = Zn, Al, Ga, In, Cd and so on; X = C, N, B), is two sided to explore new superconductors and to shed light on the superconducting mechanisms for MgCNi₃. Up to date, there are more than ten compounds neighboring to MgCNi₃ were synthesized and the physical properties investigated. These newly synthesized Ni-based antiperovskite compounds can be grouped into three types, that is, carbides ACNi₃, nitrides ANNi₃, and borides ABNi₃.

CdCNi₃ with the same number of valence electrons as MgCNi₃ is another superconductor in the carbides ACNi₃. As shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), the transition temperature is around 3.2 K, varying with fabrication conditions [27]. The superconducting parameters are listed in Table 1. The specific heat Sommerfeld constant is 18 mJ/(mol K²), smaller than that of MgCNi₃. However, the theoretical calculation shows the value is slightly larger than MgCNi₃, while the calculated e-p coupling coefficient (0.8) is nearly half that of the corresponding value of 1.5 for MgCNi₃ [28]. This is argued to be associated with a softening behavior of the lowest acoustic phonon branch along the X-R symmetry direction [28]. The large Wilson ratio and the well suppressed upper critical field  T, compared with the Pauli limit (14 T) indicate the existence of strong FM correlations. Surprisingly, ZnCNi₃ with the same number of valence electrons, as MgCNi₃ and CdCNi₃, is found to be a Pauli paramagnetic (PM) metal without signals of superconductivity down to 2 K [29]. The value of is only 6.77 mJ/(mol K²), much smaller than those of MgCNi₃ and CdCNi₃ (see Table 1), indicating a very weak e-p coupling that explains the disappearance of superconductivity. However, it was theoretically suggested that the experimental ZnCNi₃ is carbon deficient, while the stoichiometric compound should be superconducting [30].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4: Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility (a) and electrical resistivity (b) for different CdCNi₃ samples [Reproduced with permission from M. Uehara et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 034714 (2007)]. Temperature dependence of electrical resistivity (c) and magnetic susceptibility (d) for Ni₃ [Reproduced with permission from M. Uehara et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 033702 (2009)].

The polycrystalline ACNi₃ (A = Al, Ga, In) series with one more valence electron than MgCNi₃ were prepared by solid state reaction and detailed studies of their basic properties were performed. For GaCNi₃, a temperature dependence of resistivity was observed. The large values of the Kadowaki-woods ratio (μΩ cm/K²) and the Wilson ratio suggest a highly correlated Fermi liquid behavior [31]. The large electron-electron correlation was suggested to be caused by the proximity of FM order from the side of exchange-enhanced Pauli paramagnet, evidenced by the remarkable enhancements in both the specific heat Sommerfeld constant and the temperature-independent magnetic susceptibility . As to AlCNi₃ compound, the magnetic properties also show it is a strongly exchange-enhanced Pauli paramagnet in the very vicinity of FM order [32]. However, the low-temperature resistivity is nearly linear temperature-dependent, indicating a possible non-Fermi-liquid behavior which is in sharp contrast with GaCNi₃. The low-temperature electronic specific heat reveals that the spin fluctuations in AlCNi₃ are strongly enhanced when compared with the superconducting MgCNi₃, while the e-p couplings are comparable in both compounds. The Wilson ratio is about 2.4 and the dimensionless ratio that connects the low-temperature Seebeck coefficient with the Sommerfeld specific heat constant indicate that AlCNi₃ can be considered as a modest electron-correlated material. Consistently, the enhanced spin fluctuations were confirmed using ²⁷Al NMR measurement in with where the FM order was suppressed and the system is in the vicinity of FM order [33, 34]. On the contrary, an early experimental report shows AlCNi₃ is a weak ferromagnet with the FM-PM transition at 300 K [35]. The nonmagnetic ground state for AlCNi₃ and GaCNi₃ was confirmed by many theoretical reports [36–39], though the predicted FM correlations or spin fluctuations are weaker than experimentally measured [37]. The existence of carbon deficiencies to various extents may account for this divergence, as suggested by Sieberer et al. [37]. As to the InCNi₃, it was found that the reduction of Indium ratio in the mixture of the raw powders helps make pure antiperovskite type compound [26]. The resulted composition from the optimum synthesis is In0.95CNi₃. It behaves as a FM metal below the Curie temperature (577 K) [26]. It was suggested that the appearance of ferromagnetism originates from the deviation of the Ni/In atomic ratio from the ideal case. Theoretically, it is found the ideally stoichiometric InCNi₃ is a nonmagnetic metal and far away from a long-range magnetic order [25, 40]. Both In vacancies and substitutional Ni on In site were found to be able to lead to a spin-polarized ground state. Energetically, the latter scenario is more preferable to generate a FM ground state [25].

ZnNNi₃ is the only superconductor observed so far in the nitrides ANNi₃ [41]. The  K, as shown in Figures 4(c) and 4(d), is close to that of CdCNi₃. The magnetic susceptibility shows a Pauli-like behavior with the magnitude much smaller than that of CdCNi₃. It indicates the FM correlations in this material are not as enhanced as in CdCNi₃. The obtained specific heat Sommerfeld constant is 13 mJ/(mol K²), smaller than the value of 18 mJ/(mol K²) for CdCNi₃. Even so, the is close to CdCNi₃ because the FM correlation which could suppress the is weak in ZnNNi₃. Compared with MgCNi₃, a significantly reduced was theoretically observed in ZnNNi₃ [42], which accounts for the lower in ZnNNi₃ than in MgCNi₃. The CdNNi₃ and InNNi₃ were also successfully synthesized by the same authors of [41] but neither is superconducting [43]. The value is 12 mJ/(mol K²) and 8 mJ/(mol K²) for CdNNi₃ and InNNi₃, respectively, smaller than that for ZnNNi₃. However, the temperature-independent magnetic susceptibility for CdNNi₃ and InNNi₃ is larger than that of ZnNNi₃, indicative of an enhanced contribution from the FM correlations in the former two compounds. It shows by theoretical calculations that the for CdNNi₃ is comparable with that for ZnNNi₃ [44], but the is much reduced in InNNi₃ [45]. Assuming that the e-p coupling is comparable in CdNNi₃ and ZnNNi₃, it is possible to observe superconductivity in CdNNi₃ in case the FM correlations can be well suppressed. Very recently, He et al. reported two series of doped CdNNi₃, that is, () and NNi₃ () [46]. These compounds show metallic resistivity and exhibit a Fermi liquid behavior at low temperatures. No superconductivity was found down to 2 K. However, all samples exhibit very soft and weak ferromagnetism, in contrast to the PM behavior for CdNNi3 reported previously by Uehara et al. [43].

Compared with the carbides ACNi₃ and nitrides ANNi₃, little attention has been paid to the borides ABNi₃. To the best of our knowledge, ScB0.5Ni₃ [47] is the only boron based Ni-based antiprovskite compound with its physical properties reported in the literatures. It shows a Pauli PM behavior without any superconducting signals observed down to 2 K. We tried to synthesize ABNi₃ (A = Al, Ga, In, and so on) samples by solid state reaction [48]. The pure sample of InBNi₃ with the antiperovskite structure (lattice constant  Å) was successfully synthesized and structural, magnetic, transport properties, and specific heat measurements performed. No superconductivity appears down to the lowest temperature by electric and magnetic measurements (5 K) as shown in Figure 5(a). The magnetization takes a typical Pauli PM behavior with a very small contribution from the FM spin fluctuations. As shown in the inset of Figure 5(b), the low-temperature specific heat data, plotted as versus , can be well fitted using the following formula, , where is the Sommerfeld constant for electronic contribution and the second term represents the phonon contribution according to the Debye approximation [31, 32]. The fitted values of and are equal to 11.33 mJ/(mol K²) and 0.32 mJ/(mol K⁴), respectively. The Debye temperature is estimated to be 311 K according to the formula, , where is the number of atoms in a unit cell. The Wilson ration is estimated to be 0.93, very close to the free electrons, indicating weak FM correlations or spin fluctuations in InBNi₃. The value of is smaller than the superconducting compounds in Table 1. So the e-p coupling is weak in this compound, accounting for the disappearance of superconductivity. Theoretically, the is only 1.47 states eV⁻¹/f·u [49], consistent with the observed small . Besides, the authors predicted that introduction of holes into InBNi₃ could make it superconducting, which has not been proved experimentally yet. Theoretically, it is predicted that AlBNi₃ is candidate for studying unconventional superconductivity, which has not been tested experimentally either [50].

(a)

(b)

Figure 5: (Color online) The physical properties for InBNi₃. (a) dc magnetic susceptibility at  kOe. Inset shows the temperature dependence of resistivity measure at zero field. (b) Specific heat as a function of temperature. Inset shows a linear fit of / versus below 15 K.

4. A Universal Phase Diagram

Thanks to the systematic studies in the past, it is possible to draw a uniform picture of the properties for the Ni-based antiperovskite compounds, thus to shed light on the unique superconductivity in MgCNi₃. The Debye temperature obtained from specific heat measurements, the calculated density of state at Fermi level available in the published literatures are plotted as a function the lattice constant, as shown in Figure 6. Two main trends can be found, the increases approximately as the lattice constant is reduced. The shrinkage of lattice constant reduces the , which is more scattered than though.

Figure 6: (Color online) The Debye temperature, , and the DOS at , as a function of the lattice parameter for Ni-based antiperovskite compounds. The crossing dashed lines indicate the trends of (downwards) and (upwards) with increasing the lattice constant . The values are derived from specific heat data reported in [26, 29, 31, 32, 41]. The values are from theoretical calculations where corresponding calculated lattice constant is the closet to the experimental ones [4, 28, 30, 37, 39, 40, 42].

The evolution of derived from experimental specific heat data with lattice constant can be understood as follows: the lattice contraction leads to the hardening of phonon mode, thus an increase of Debye temperature [29]. There exists a strong hybridization between X 2p and Ni 3d orbitals [4, 5, 16, 25, 30, 36, 37], playing important roles in determining the physical properties. The decrease of lattice constant reduces the Ni–C bond length, thus enhances the hybridization, leading to a decreased . It is more general that the DOS is inversely proportional to the band width . for a cubic solid, the band width is related with the lattice constant by the expression [29]. Therefore, the decrease of lattice constant will increase the band width, leading to a reduction of . In addition, the theoretical calculations show there is a peak structure in the DOS below the for all Ni-based antiperovskite compounds AXNi₃. For carbide compounds ACNi₃ (A = Al, Ga, In) or ZnNNi₃ that has more electrons than MgCNi₃, could be interpreted as electron-doped MgCNi₃, resulting in a downward shift of the position of the peak in the DOS from the , consequently a reduced [39]. In a word, the is expected to increase as the lattice expands. It is basically followed by many compounds as shown in Figure 6. However, the real case may be too complex to be attributed to the above models. One example is InBNi₃ whose is extremely lower than expected. It is probably because the B 2p state in borides hybridizes with Ni 3d state more than the C 2p state in carbides ACNi₃ [51].

For a BCS theory, the e-p coupling constant can be estimated by the McMillan’s formula [32], , where is the averaged electron-ion matrix element squared, is an atomic mass, and the averaged phonon frequency proportional to Debye temperature . Therefore, a combination of a large and small will lead to a strong e-p coupling, consequently a BCS-like superconductor. The Ni-based antiperovskite compounds seem to obey this raw. All discovered superconductors locate on the right side of the map in Figure 6, where the is relatively small, but the is relatively large. For instance, MgCNi₃ which shows the highest has the largest and smallest . Figure 6 also suggests that the superconductivity observed in the Ni-based antiperovskite compounds is predominantly s-wave BCS type mediated by e-p coupling, though the other contributions, for example, from spin fluctuations, may not be excluded. We note that the for MgCNi₃ in the figure is from polycrystalline sample [27], while the value deduced from resistivity for single crystal MgCNi₃ is surprisingly small (132 K) [18]. There is no clear trend for the relation between number of the valence electrons and or . Regardless of this, the phase diagram in Figure 6 provides a clue for searching new superconductors in Ni-based antiperovskite compound AXNi₃, namely, the compounds with large lattice constant may be superconducting in terms of the BCS scenario.

5. Future Outlook

In the future, the following works are worthy to be done.

a.New MgCNi₃ single crystals with ideal 1 : 1 : 3 stoichiometry would finally close the long-time debate on the mechanism of superconductivity. b.In order to clarify the divergences among the experimental and theoretical results for the Ni-based antiperovksite compounds other than MgCNi₃, more extensive investigations on single crystal samples are desirable. The growth of single crystal AXNi₃ is a challenge. The successful growth of MgCNi₃ single crystals would help, because the application of high pressure during heating can improve the solubility of carbon and suppresses the volatility of magnesium. c.The AXNi₃ materials may serve as a platform for studying quantum critical phenomena (QCP) and quantum phase transitions (QPT) in simple material systems with three-dimensional cubic structure and none “f” elements. Previously, the QCP and QPT have been extensively studied in some “unique” systems [52], such as heavy fermions with “f” elements, magnetic systems with spin frustration, and so on. Taking the advantages of the single crystal samples, the possible quantum phase transitions can be explored in some AXNi₃, such as AlCNi₃, GaCNi₃, and CdCNi₃, driven by chemical alloying, external pressure, or magnetic field. d.It is interesting to explore new superconductors with antiperovskite structure based the clues mentioned, for example, large lattice constant may favor BCS superconductivity. This clue may work for the antiperovskite compounds based on other 3d elements, such as Ti and Sc. The discovery of new superconductors can always cheer the superconductor society.

6. Conclusion

We summarized the recent progress for Ni-based antiperovskite compounds closely related to the superconducting MgCNi₃. A universal phase diagram is presented based on the published data, which would help design new superconductors with the antiperovskite structure. The synthesis and characterization on single crystals are desirable for future study in order to eliminate the divergences made by different authors or between the theoretical and experimental result.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Basic Research under Contract no. 2011CBA00111 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Contract nos. 50701042, 11174295, 51001094, 51171177, and 91222109.

References

J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Müller, “Possible high superconductivity in the Ba–La–Cu–O system,” Zeitschrift für Physik B, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 189–193, 1986.

T. He, Q. Huang, A. P. Ramirez et al., “Superconductivity in the non-oxide perovskite MgCNi₃,” Nature, vol. 411, no. 6833, pp. 54–56, 2001.

H. Rosner, R. Weht, M. D. Johannes, W. E. Pickett, and E. Tosatti, “Superconductivity near ferromagnetism in MgCNi₃,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 2, Article ID 027001, pp. 270011–270014, 2002.

D. J. Singh and I. I. Mazin, “Superconductivity and electronic structure of perovskite MgCNi₃,” Physical Review B, vol. 64, no. 14, Article ID 140507, pp. 1405071–1405074, 2001.

J. H. Shim, S. K. Kwon, and B. I. Min, “Electronic structures of antiperovskite superconductors MgxNi₃ (X = B, C, and N),” Physical Review B, vol. 64, no. 18, Article ID 180510, pp. 1805101–1805104, 2001.

P. M. Singer, T. Imai, T. He, M. A. Hayward, and R. J. Cava, “¹³C NMR investigation of the superconductor MgCNi₃ up to 800 K,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 25, Article ID 257601, pp. 257601/1–257601/4, 2001.

R. Prozorov, A. Snezhko, T. He, and R. J. Cava, “Evidence for unconventional superconductivity in the nonoxide perovskite MgCNi₃ from penetration depth measurements,” Physical Review B, vol. 68, no. 18, Article ID 180502, pp. 1805021–1805024, 2003.

X. F. Lu, L. Shan, Z. Wang et al., “Evidence for s-wave pairing from measurement of the lower critical field in MgCNi₃,” Physics Review B, vol. 71, no. 18, Article ID 174511, 2005.

D. P. Young, M. Moldovan, and P. W. Adams, “Scaling behavior of the critical current density in MgCNi₃ microfibers,” Physical Review B, vol. 70, no. 6, Article ID 064508, pp. 064508–5, 2004.

Z. Q. Mao, M. M. Rosario, K. D. Nelson et al., “Experimental determination of superconducting parameters for the intermetallic perovskite superconductor MgCNi₃,” Physical Review B, vol. 67, no. 9, Article ID 094502, pp. 945021–945026, 2003.

L. Shan, H. J. Tao, H. Gao et al., “s-wave pairing in MgCNi₃ revealed by point contact tunneling,” Physical Review B, vol. 68, no. 14, Article ID 144510, pp. 1445101–1445105, 2003.

T. Klimczuk and R. J. Cava, “Carbon isotope effect in superconducting MgCNi₃,” Physical Review B, vol. 70, no. 21, Article ID 212514, pp. 1–3, 2004.

J.-Y. Lin, P. L. Ho, H. L. Huang et al., “BCS-like superconductivity in MgCNi₃,” Physical Review B, vol. 67, no. 5, Article ID 052501, pp. 525011–525014, 2003.

A. Wälte, G. Fuchs, K. H. Müller et al., “Evidence for strong electron-phonon coupling in MgCNi₃,” Physical Review B, vol. 70, no. 17, Article ID 174503, pp. 1–18, 2004.

G. J. MacDougall, R. J. Cava, S. J. Kim et al., “Muon spin rotation study of MgCNi₃,” Physica B, vol. 374-375, pp. 263–266, 2006.

S. Mollah, “The physics of the non-oxide perovskite superconductor MgCNi₃,” Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 16, no. 43, pp. R1237–R1276, 2004.

H.-S. Lee, D. J. Jang, H. G. Lee, S. I. Lee, S. M. Choi, and C. J. Kim, “Growth of single crystals of MgCNi₃,” Advanced Materials, vol. 19, no. 14, pp. 1807–1809, 2007.

H.-S. Lee, D. J. Jang, H. G. Lee, W. Kang, M. H. Cho, and S. I. Lee, “Evidence of conventional superconductivity in single-crystalline MgCNi 3,” Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 20, no. 25, Article ID 255222, 2008.

J. Kačmarcík, Z. Pribulov, C. Marcenat et al., “Specific heat of superconducting MgCNi₃ single crystals,” Journal of Physics, vol. 150, no. 5, Article ID 052087, 2009.

Z. Pribulová, J. Kačmarčík, C. Marcenat et al., “Superconducting energy gap in MgCNi₃ single crystals: Point-contact spectroscopy and specific-heat measurements,” Physical Review B, vol. 83, no. 10, Article ID 104511, 2011.

P. Diener, P. Rodière, T. Klein et al., “s-wave superconductivity probed by measuring magnetic penetration depth and lower critical field of MgCNi₃ single crystals,” Physical Review B, vol. 79, no. 22, Article ID 220508, 2009.

H. Hong, M. Upton, A. H. Said et al., “Phonon dispersions and anomalies of MgCNi₃ single-crystal superconductors determined by inelastic x-ray scattering,” Physical Review B, vol. 82, no. 13, Article ID 134535, 2010.

P. K. Jha, S. D. Gupta, and S. K. Gupta, “Puzzling phonon dispersion curves and vibrational mode instability in superconducting MgCNi₃,” AIP Advances, vol. 2, no. 2, Article ID 022120, 2012.

D.-J. Jang, H. S. Lee, H. G. Lee, M. H. Cho, and S. I. Lee, “Collapse of the peak effect due to ac-induced flux creep in an isotropic vortex system of MgCNi₃ single crystals,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 4, Article ID 047003, 2009.

I. R. Shein and A. L. Ivanovskii, “Electronic and elastic properties of non-oxide anti-perovskites from first principles: Superconducting CdCNi₃ in comparison with magnetic InCNi₃,” Physics Review B, vol. 77, no. 10, Article ID 104101, 2008.

P. Tong, Y. P. Sun, X. B. Zhu, and W. H. Song, “Synthesis and physical properties of antiperovskite-type compound In0.95CNiM₃,” Solid State Communications, vol. 141, no. 6, pp. 336–340, 2007.

M. Uehara, T. Yamazaki, T. Kôri, T. Kashida, Y. Kimishima, and I. Hase, “Superconducting properties of CdCNi₃,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 76, no. 3, Article ID 034714, 2007.

S. Bağcı, S. Duman, H. M. Tütüncü, and G. P. Srivastava, “Ground state, phonon spectrum, and superconducting properties of the nonoxide perovskite CdCNi₃,” Physics Review B, vol. 78, no. 17, Article ID 174504, 2008.

M. S. Park, J. S. Giim, S. H. Park, Y. W. Lee, S. I. Lee, and E. J. Choi, “Physical properties of ZnCNi₃: Comparison with superconducting MgCNi₃,” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 274–277, 2004.

M. D. Johannes and W. E. Pickett, “Electronic structure of ZnCNi₃,” Physical Review B, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 060507–4, 2004.

P. Tong, Y. P. Sun, X. B. Zhu, and W. H. Song, “Strong electron-electron correlation in the antiperovskite compound GaCNi₃,” Physical Review B, vol. 73, no. 24, Article ID 245106, 2006.

P. Tong, Y. P. Sun, X. B. Zhu, and W. H. Song, “Strong spin fluctuations and possible non-Fermi-liquid behavior in AlCNi₃,” Physics Review B, vol. 74, no. 22, Article ID 224416, 2006.

B. Chen, C. Michioka, Y. Itoh, and K. Yoshimura, “Synthesis and magnetic properties of Ni₃AlCx,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 77, no. 10, Article ID 103708, 2008.

B. Chen, H. Ohta, C. Michioka, Y. Itoh, and K. Yoshimura, “²⁷Al NMR studies of itinerant electron ferromagnetic Ni₃ AlCx,” Physical Review B, vol. 81, no. 13, Article ID 134416, 2010.

A. F. Dong, G. C. Che, W. W. Huang, S. L. Jia, H. Chen, and Z. X. Zhao, “Synthesis and physical properties of AlCNi₃,” Physica C, vol. 422, no. 1-2, pp. 65–69, 2005.

C. M. I. Okoye, “Theoretical investigation of electronic structure and optical properties of paramagnetic non-oxide perovskite AlCNi₃,” Solid State Communications, vol. 136, no. 11-12, pp. 605–610, 2005.

M. Sieberer, P. Mohn, and J. Redinger, “Role of carbon in AlCNi₃ and GaCNi₃: a density functional theory study,” Physics Review B, vol. 75, no. 2, Article ID 024431, 2007.

G. H. Zhong, J. L. Wang, Z. Zeng, X. H. Zheng, and H. Q. Lin, “Induced effects by the substitution of Mg in MgCNi₃,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, no. 9, Article ID 09G520, 2007.

F. Boutaiba, A. Zaoui, and M. Ferhat, “Ground state analysis of XCNi₃ (X=Mg, Zn, and Ga) from first-principles,” Physica B, vol. 406, no. 2, pp. 265–269, 2011.

S. Q. Wu, Z. F. Hou, and Z. Z. Zhu, “Electronic structure and magnetic state of InCNi₃,” Physica B, vol. 403, no. 23-24, pp. 4232–4235, 2008.

M. Uehara, A. Uehara, K. Kozawa, and Y. Kimishima, “New antiperovskite-type superconductor ZnNyNi₃,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 0337021–0337024, 2009.

I. R. Shein, V. V. Bannikov, and A. L. Ivanovskii, “Elastic and electronic properties of the new perovskite-like superconductor ZnNNi₃ in comparison with MgCNi₃,” Physica Status Solidi B, vol. 247, no. 1, pp. 72–76, 2010.

M. Uehara, A. Uehara, K. Kozawa, T. Yamazaki, and Y. Kimishima, “New antiperovskite superconductor ZnNNi₃, and related compounds CdNNi₃ and InNNi₃,” Physica C, vol. 470, no. 1, pp. S688–S690, 2010.

C. Li, W. G. Chen, F. Wang et al., “First-principles investigation of mechanical and electronic properties of MNNi₃ (M=Zn, Mg, or Cd),” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105, no. 12, Article ID 123921, 2009.

Z. F. Hou, “Elastic properties and electronic structures of antiperovskite-type InNCo₃ and InNNi₃,” Solid State Communications, vol. 150, no. 39-40, pp. 1874–1879, 2010.

B. He, C. Dong, L. H. Yang, L. H. Ge, L. B. Mu, and X. C. Chen, “Preparation and the physical properties of antiperovskite-type compounds Cd1-xInxNNi₃ () and Cd1-yCuyNNi₃ (),” Chinese Physics B, vol. 21, no. 4, Article ID 047401, 2012.

T. Shishido, K. Kudou, T. Sasaki et al., “Search for perovskite-type new borides in the Sc-TM-B (TM = Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni) systems,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 383, no. 1-2, pp. 294–297, 2004.

P. Tong, Study on the physical properties of nickel based antiperovskite compounds [Ph.D. thesis], 2007.

I. R. Shein, A. L. Ivanovskii, and N. I. Medvedeva, “Electronic structure of the new MgCNi₃ superconductor and related intermetallic compounds,” JETP Letters, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 122–127, 2001.

I. Hase, “Ni₃AlB: A bridge between superconductivity and ferromagnetism,” Physics Review B, vol. 70, no. 3, Article ID 033105, 2004.

I. Hase, “Electronic structure of Ni₃AlXy (X = B, C, H; ),” Materials Transactions, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 475–477, 2006.

H. V. Löhneysen, A. Rosch, M. Vojta, and P. Wölfle, “Fermi-liquid instabilities at magnetic quantum phase transitions,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 1015–1075, 2007.