The energy of electrons and holes in cylindrical quantum wires with a finite potential well was calculated by two methods. An analytical expression is approximately determined that allows one to calculate the energy of electrons and holes at the first discrete level in a cylindrical quantum wire. The electron energy was calculated by two methods for cylindrical layers of different radius. In the calculations, the nonparabolicity of the electron energy spectrum is taken into account. The dependence of the effective masses of electrons and holes on the radius of a quantum wires is determined. An analysis is made of the dependence of the energy of electrons and holes on the internal and external radii, and it is determined that the energy of electrons and holes in cylindrical layers with a constant thickness weakly depends on the internal radius. The results were obtained for the InP/InAs heterostructures.
Program for Fundamental ResearchBA-FA-F-2-0051. Introduction
In recent years, a lot of work has been done on calculating the energy of electrons and holes in quantum wells based on InP/InAs/InP heterostructures, due to the fact that today, for the creation of new-generation devices, it largely depends on semiconductor nanostructures.
In [1, 2], various technologies for growing quantum wires were presented, and nanowires of various sizes were obtained. In [3], core-shell nanowires were experimentally obtained, and it was shown that the cross-sectional area is in the shape of a hexagon. Optical properties of InAs/InP-based quantum wires were studied by photoluminesce spectroscopy [4]. The optical properties of core-multishell nanowires based on InP/InAs/InP were experimentally studied in [5–8]. The relaxation time of electron spin in semiconductor quantum wires has been experimentally investigated.
In type III-V semiconductors and in heterostructures based on them, electron dispersion is strongly nonparabolic; the Kane model was used to study the spectrum of charge carriers of these materials [9]. In [10], the energy spectrum of an electron with a nonparabolic dispersion law in quantum wires with a rectangular cross-sectional shape was theoretically investigated. The authors of [11, 12] also theoretically studied the energy spectrum of an electron with a nonparabolic dispersion law in quantum wires, but with a hexagonal and triangular cross-sectional shape. The influence of electronic, polaron, and coulomb interactions on energy states in quantum nanowires was studied [13–16]. The I-V characteristic of nanowires was considered taking into account the tunneling of electrons in quantum states [17, 18]. The effect of temperature on the energy levels [19, 20] and optical absorption [21] of quantum dots are studied. The energy levels of InAs/InP quantum dots have been studied [22]. In [23–28], to determine the energy spectrum and wave function of an electron in quantum wires with a rectangular cross-sectional shape, solutions of the Schrödinger equation were obtained using various mathematical methods. The effect of an electric field on the energy spectrum of a rectangular quantum wire is investigated [29].
The authors of [30–33] obtained analytical solutions of the Schrödinger equation for cylindrical quantum wires with a finite potential and a parabolic dispersion law. The solution of the Schrödinger equation is obtained by the finite difference method (shooting method) for rectangular [34] and cylindrical [35, 36] quantum wires.
In this paper, two methods are used to calculate the energy of electrons and holes for a cylindrical quantum wire and a quantum nanorod with a finite potential well. In this case, the nonparabolicity of the dispersion of electrons and holes is taken into account. The relationship between the effective mass of charge carriers and the radius of a quantum wire is determined.
2. An Analytical Method for Calculating the Electron Energy in a Cylindrical Quantum Wire with a Finite Height of the Potential Well
Figure 1 shows the geometric and potential diagram of a cylindrical quantum wire with a finite potential well. The potential energy of an electron of a cylindrical quantum wire with a finite depth has the form:(1)Ur=Uρ=0,0≤ρ≤R,W,ρ>R.
Geometric and potential diagram of a cylindrical quantum wire with a finite potential well.
The Schrödinger equation in a cylindrical coordinate system is as follows:(2)−ℏ221ρ∂∂ρρmρ∂∂ρ+1ρ2∂2∂ϕ2+∂2∂z2fr+Urfr=Efr.
We seek a solution to this equation in the following form:(3)fr=eikzzeilϕψρ,
Here, the parameters kx and l are independent of coordinates. Therefore, equation (2) will be solved for the radial wave function. Thus, equation (2) in region 0≤ρ≤R for the radial wave function ψρ takes the following form:(4)∂2ψρ∂ρ2+1ρ∂ψρ∂ρ+kA2−l2ρ2ψρ=0,0≤ρ≤R,where(5)ξ=kAρ,kA=2mAℏ2E−kz2.
In this case, equation (4) takes the following form:(6)ξ2∂2ψρ∂ξ2+ξ∂ψρ∂ξ+ξ2−l2ψρ=0.
The general solution to this equation is in the form of a linear combination of the Bessel function Jlξ and the Neumann function Nlξ of the l-th order [37]:(7)ψ1ρ=A1JlkAρ+B1NlkAρ,0≤ρ≤R.
Equation (2) for the radial wave function ψρ in region ρ>R takes the following form:(8)ζ2∂2ψ∂ζ2+ζ∂ψ∂ζ+−ζ2−M2ψ=0,ρ>R,where(9)ζ=γBρ,γB=2mBℏ2W−E+kz2.
The solution of equation (8) gives a linear combination of the imaginary argument Ilζ of the Bessel function and the Macdonald function Klζ of the l-th order [37]:(10)ψ2ρ=A2KlγBρ+B2IlγBρ,ρ>R.Therefore, ψρ for a radial wave function is appropriate for the following:(11)ψρ=A1JlkAρ+B1NlkAρ,0≤ρ≤R,A2KlγBρ+B2IlγBρ,ρ>R.
If we take into account that the wave function inside the cylinder is finite and equal to zero at an infinite distance from the center of the cylinder, expression (11) takes the following form:(12)ψρ=A1JlkAρ,0≤ρ≤R,A2KlγBρ,ρ>R.
Here, A1 and A2 are constant values. We select relation A1/A2 in such a way that the following boundary conditions are satisfied:(13)ψ1ρ|ρ=R=ψ2ρ|ρ=R,1mAdψ1ρdρ|ρ=R=1mBdψ2ρdρ|ρ=R.
From (12) and (13), we obtain the following transcendental equation:(14)Jl′kARKlγBRJlkARKl′γBR=mAmB.
Solving the transcendental equation (14), we can determine the electron energy in a cylindrical quantum wire.
When the argument is too small under condition l=0, expanding the imaginary argument of the Bessel function Ilζ and MacDonald Klζ in a row, we get the first terms and an analytical formula for calculating the energy:(15)E0,1=4ℏ2mAR22mBW/ℏ2RK02mBW/ℏ2R+2K12mBW/ℏ2R2mBW/ℏ2RK02mBW/ℏ2R+4K12mBW/ℏ2R.
If we take into account (5) and (9), expression (15) gives very close results to the exact results of equation (14) when calculating the energy of electrons and holes in cylindrical nanowires with larger radii (Figures 2–4).
The dependence of energy on the radius of a cylindrical nanowire for electrons and holes with the parabolic and nonparabolic dispersion law.
The dependence of the energy of a heavy hole on the radius of a cylindrical quantum wire for the parabolic and nonparabolic dispersion law.
The dependence of the energy of a light hole on the radius of a cylindrical quantum wire for the parabolic and nonparabolic dispersion law.
3. The Analytical Method for Calculating the Electron Energy in a Cylindrical Quantum Nanorod with a Finite Height of the Potential Well
Figure 5 shows the geometric and potential diagram of a cylindrical quantum nanorod with a finite potential well. Let the potential energy of an electron in a cylindrical quantum nanorod with a finite depth be given by the following expression:(16)Ur=Uρ=W,0<ρ<R1,0,R1≤ρ≤R2,W,R2<ρ.
The geometric and potential scheme of a cylindrical quantum nanorod with a finite potential well.
The Schrödinger equation in a cylindrical coordinate system in this case is as follows:(17)−ℏ221ρ∂∂ρρmρ∂∂ρ+1ρ2∂2∂ϕ2+∂2∂z2fr+Urfr=Efr,
The solution to the radial part of the equation will be(18)ψρ=A1KlγBρ+B1IlγBρ,0<ρ<R1,A2JlkAρ+B2NlkAρ,R1≤ρ≤R2,A3KlγBρ+B3IlγBρ,R2<ρ.
If we take into account that the wave function inside a cylindrical quantum nanorod is finite and equal to zero at an infinite distance from the center of the quantum nanorod, then expression (18) takes the following form:(19)ψρ=B1IlγBρ,0<ρ<R1,A2JlkAρ+B2NlkAρ,R1≤ρ≤R2,A3KlγBρ,R2<ρ.
For the continuity of the wave function, the following conditions must be met:(20)ψ1ρ|ρ=R1=ψ2ρ|ρ=R1,1mBdψ1ρdρ|ρ=R1=1mAdψ2ρdρ|ρ=R1,ψ2ρ|ρ=R2=ψ3ρ|ρ=R2,1mAdψ2ρdρ|ρ=R2=1mBdψ3ρdρ|ρ=R2.
Applying boundary conditions (20) to expression (19), we obtain the following system of equations:(21)B1IlγBR1=A2JlkAR1+B2NlkAR1,1mBB1Il′γBR1=1mAA2Jl′kAR1+B2Nl′kAR1,A2JlkAR2+B2NlkAR2=A3KlγBR2,1mAA2Jl′kAR2+B2Nl′kAR2=1mBA3Kl′γBR2.
Solving the system of equation (21), we obtain the following transcendental equation:(22)mA/mBJlkAR1Il′γBR1−Jl′kAR1IlγBR1mA/mBJlkAR2Kl′γBR2−Jl′kAR2KlγBR2=Nl′kAR1IlγBR1−mA/mBNlkAR1Il′γBR1Nl′kAR2KlγBR2−mA/mBNlkAR2Kl′γBR2.
Transcendental equation (22) allows us to calculate the energy of electrons and holes in cylindrical nanolayers with a finite potential well.
4. The Shooting Method for Calculating the Electron Energy in a Cylindrical Quantum Wire and in a Quantum Nanorod with a Finite Height of a Potential Well
Given the effective mass, the Schrödinger equation will be as follows:(23)−ℏ22ρ∂∂ρρmρ∂∂ρψρ+Vρψρ=Eψρ.
Equation (23) is used for the parabolic dispersion law, and it is solved by the finite difference method—the Shooting method [38]. We will try to solve equation (23) by the same method for the nonparabolic dispersion law. In this case, we represent the wave function and the derivative of the effective mass in the following form:(24)dψdρ≈ψρ+δρ−ψρ−δρ2δρ,(25)d2ψdρ2≈ψρ+δρ−2ψρ+ψρ−δρδρ2,(26)dmdρ≈mρ+δρ−mρ−δρ2δρ.
Using (23)–(26), we obtain the following:(27)ρmρψρ+δρ−2ψρ+ψρ−δρδρ2−ψρ+δρ−ψρ−δρ2δρρmρ+δρ−mρ−δρ2δρ−mρ,=2ρmρ2ℏ2Vρ−Eψρ.
From here, we get(28)ψρ+δρ=8δρmρ2/ℏ2Vρ−E+mρ2mρ2+δρ/ρ−mρ+δρ+mρ−δρψρ−2mρ2−δρ/ρ+mρ+δρ−mρ−δρ2mρ2+δρ/ρ−mρ+δρ+mρ−δρψρ−δρ.
If the values of ψρ−δρ and ψρ are known for wave functions, then using (28), it is possible to determine the value of ψρ+δρ for an arbitrary energy. In order to calculate the wave function and energy of electrons and holes, it is necessary to take into account the following three boundary conditions:(29)ψ∞⟶0,ψ0=1,ψδρ=1.
5. Analysis of the Results
It is known that the lattice constant for InP is 0.5869 nm, and this value is close to the lattice constant for InAs 0.6058 nm [39]. This allows you to get the perfect heterostructures using these materials. Figure 6 shows the band diagram of the InP/InAs based heterostructures. To take into account the nonparabolicity of the zone, we use the Kane model [9]. Various approximations for the effective mass are given in [10, 40–43]; we will use the following expression for the effective mass:(30)mInPiE=m0/InPi1+αInPiE−Vρ,αInPi=1EgInP1−mim02,αInAsi=1EgInAs1−mim02,where i=e,hh,lh.
The band diagram of the InP/InAs heterostructure.
Table 1 shows the necessary parameters for InAs and InP obtained by various authors. For our calculations, we will choose the parameters shown in Table 2.
Material parameters of InAs and InP.
Parameter
InAs
InP
EgeV
0.35[39]
1.35[39,44,45]
0.36[44,46]
1.424[47]
0.417[47,48]
1.423[48]
0.42[48]
1.42[48,49]
0.418[49]
me/m0
0.022[39]
0.077[39,47,50]
0.023[44,47,48,50]
0.08[44]
0.024[48]
0.079[48,49]
mhh/m0
0.41[39,48]
0.6[39]
0.6[44]
0.85[44]
0.34[50]
0.65[48]
0.472[50]
mlh/m0
0.026[39]
0.12[39,48]
0.027[44,50]
0.098[44]
0.025[48]
0.096[50]
χeV
4.92[39]
4.38[39]
4.9[45]
4.4[45]
2m0P2/ℏ2eV
22.2[39]
20.4[39]
21.5[47,48]
20.7[47,48]
2mnP2/ℏ2eV
0.5[48]
1.46[48]
Δ0eV
0.38[39,47,49]
0.11[39,49]
0.39[48]
0.108[47,48]
Material parameters of InAs and InP.
Material parameters
EgeV
mem0
mhhm0
mlhm0
χeV
αe1/eV
αhh1/eV
αlh1/eV
Δ0eV
ΔECeV
ΔEVeV
InAs
0.36
0.023
0.41
0.026
4.91
2.65
0.97
2.63
0.38
0.52
0.47
InP
1.35
0.077
0.65
0.096
4.39
0.63
0.09
0.6
0.11
Eg is the band gap, me/m0 is the effective mass of the electron in the conduction band, mlh/m0 and mhh/m0 are the effective masses of light and heavy holes in the valence band, χ is the electron affinity, αi is the nonparabolicity coefficient, and Δ0 is spin-orbit interaction.
A numerical solution of transcendental equation (14) determines the wave functions and the energy of electrons and holes. By an approximate solution of this equation, equation (15) is obtained. For large radii, the solution of equation (15) gives results that are close to the exact results of equation (14). The energy and wave function of the particles are calculated using expression (28), which is obtained by the finite difference method. The calculations were performed taking into account the nonparabolicity of the zones using expression (30). The dependence of the energy on the radius of a cylindrical nanowire for electrons and holes is shown taking into account the parabolic and nonparabolic zones (Figures 2–4). Figure 7 shows the radial wave function of the electron. Usually, the electron wave function as ρ⟶∞ is equal to zero. If at the size of the potential well R, we choose that the wave function at a distance inside the barrier is R/2, and then the error in calculating the energy was 0.01 meV compared to ρ⟶∞. The dependence of the effective masses of electrons and holes on the radius of a cylindrical nanowire was determined (Figures 8–10). The results of the graphs show that the effective mass of charge carriers decreases with increasing radius of the nanowires and, at large radii, approaches m0. Thus, the nonparabolicity of the system at small radii is more noticeable than at large radii.
The dependence of the radial wave function of an electron on the radius of a cylindrical quantum wire with a finite potential.
The dependence of the effective electron mass on the radius of a cylindrical quantum wire with a finite potential.
The dependence of the effective mass of a heavy hole on the radius of a cylindrical quantum wire with a finite potential.
The dependence of the effective mass of a light hole on the radius of a cylindrical quantum wire with a finite potential.
The resulting expression (22) allows us to calculate the energy in cylindrical nanorod with inner and outer radii R1 and R2, respectively. The results are compared by expression (22) and expression (28) (Figures 11–13). Figure 14 shows the radial wave function of the electron. Here, we assumed that the wave function inside the barrier at a distance R1 is zero, and the error in this case is 0.01 meV. The results shown in Figure 15 allow us to draw the following conclusion: for a constant thickness of cylindrical nanorod, there is a weak dependence of the particle energy on the internal radius R1, i.e., with an increase in R1, a slight increase in particle energy is observed.
The dependence of the electron energy on the thickness of the layer of a cylindrical quantum nanorod with a finite potential.
The dependence of the energy of a heavy hole on the thickness of a layer of a cylindrical quantum nanorod with a finite potential.
The dependence of the energy of a light hole on the layer thickness of a cylindrical quantum nanorod with a finite potential.
The dependence of the radial wave function of an electron on the radius of a cylindrical quantum nanorod with a finite potential.
The dependence of the particle energy on the inner radius with a constant layer thickness of a cylindrical quantum nanorod and with a finite potential.
6. Conclusion
The Schrödinger equation for cylindrical nanowires and for cylindrical nanorods was solved by two methods. An approximate equation is obtained that determines the first energy level in cylindrical quantum wires with large radii. When solving the Schrödinger equation, the change in the effective masses of electrons and holes was taken into account. Graphs of the effective mass of electrons and holes versus nanowire radius are presented. The energy of electrons and holes in cylindrical nanorods was calculated, and the effects of parabolicity and nonparabolicity of the zones were compared. It is shown that, for a constant thickness of cylindrical nanorods, there is a weak dependence of the particle energy on the change in the internal radius R1, that is, with an increase in R1, a slight increase in the particle energy is observed.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (Kh.N. Juraev).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the Program for Fundamental Research (grant number BA-FA-F-2-005).
MohanP.MotohisaJ.FukuiT.Controlled growth of highly uniform, axial/radial direction-defined, individually addressable InP nanowire arrays200516122903290710.1088/0957-4484/16/12/0292-s2.0-27944495968MotohisaJ.NoborisakaJ.TakedaJ.InariM.FukuiT.Catalyst-free selective-area MOVPE of semiconductor nanowires on (111)B oriented substrates20042721-418018510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.08.1182-s2.0-9944256404MohanP.MotohisaJ.FukuiT.Realization of conductive InAs nanotubes based on lattice-mismatched InP ∕ InAs core-shell nanowires20068801311010.1063/1.21615762-s2.0-33645522815MazurY. I.DoroganV. G.BierwagenO.Spectroscopy of shallow InAs/InP quantum wire nanostructures20092061006540110.1088/0957-4484/20/6/0654012-s2.0-65449173921PalB.GotoK.IkezawaM.Spectral diffusion of type-II excitons in wurtzite InP/InAs/InP core-multishell nanowires2009129121941194410.1016/j.jlumin.2009.04.0442-s2.0-70349972982BaiM.HuangH.LiuZ.InAs/InP core/shell nanowire gas sensor: effects of InP shell on sensitivity and long-term stability201949814375610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.1437562-s2.0-85071728275LiY.GotoK.MohanP.MotohisaJ.FukuiT.Bimolecular interlayer scattering of electrons in InP/InAs/InP core-multishell nanowires201313313513710.1016/j.jlumin.2011.09.0362-s2.0-84868682873TomimotoF.KammermeierM.KönigJ.Ultralong spin lifetimes in one-dimensional semiconductor nanowires20191142020210110.1063/1.50969702-s2.0-85065967209SchüllerE. O.Band structure of indium antimonide19571424926110.1016/0022-3697(57)90013-62-s2.0-30244514592GodoyA.YangZ.RavaioliU.GámizF.Effects of nonparabolic bands in quantum wires20059801370210.1063/1.19401432-s2.0-22944441623Gómez-CamposF. M.Rodríguez-BolívarS.CarcellerJ. E.A new approach to analyzing anisotropic and non-parabolic effects on quantum wires20087334234510.1007/s10825-008-0256-92-s2.0-50949091667WongB. M.LéonardF.LiQ.WangG. T.Nanoscale effects on heterojunction electron gases in GaN/AlGaN core/shell nanowires20111183074307910.1021/nl200981x2-s2.0-80051653631GulyamovG.GulyamovA. G.DavlatovA. B.ShahobiddinovB. B.Electron energy in rectangular and cylindrical quantum wires202040402310.21272/jnep.12(4).04023SunH.LiuB.-C.TianQ.Polaron effects in cylindrical GaAs/Al x Ga1–x as core-shell nanowires201726909730210.1088/1674-1056/26/9/0973022-s2.0-85028967818HarutyunyanV. A.HayrapetyanD. B.KazaryanE. M.Optical transitions and photoluminescence in cylindrical core/layer/shell β-CdS/β-HgS/β-CdS heterostructure20206281305131610.1134/s106378342008003xHarutyunyanV. A.Semiconductor nanotube in the field of uniformly charged ring: additional quantization in the form of one-dimensional hydrogen-type levels201457697510.1016/j.physe.2013.10.0262-s2.0-84888602527SalimianS.ArifO.ZannierV.Electrical probing of carrier separation in InAs/InP/GaAsSb core-dualshell nanowires20201341065107010.1007/s12274-020-2745-5ErcolaniF. S.BaumgartnerA.GubserL.Highly symmetric and tunable tunnel couplings in InAs/InP nanowire heterostructure quantum dots2020311313500310.1088/1361-6528/ab5ce6CygorekM.KorkusinskiM.HawrylakP.Atomistic theory of electronic and optical properties of InAsP/InP nanowire quantum dots2020101710.1103/PhysRevB.101.075307HaS. H.ZhuJ.Temperature effect on shallow impurity states in a wurtzite GaN/Al Ga1-N core-shell nanowire202012211417910.1016/j.physe.2020.114179LiuG.LiuR.ChenG.ZhangZ.GuoK.LuL.Nonlinear optical rectification and electronic structure in asymmetric coupled quantum wires20201710302710.1016/j.rinp.2020.103027ZielińskiM.Vanishing fine structure splitting in highly asymmetric InAs/InP quantum dots without wetting layer20201011354210.1038/s41598-020-70156-1BouazraA.Abdi-Ben NasrallahS.PoncetA.BouazraY.SaidM.Numerical simulation of coupling effect on electronic states in quantum wires200967224525010.1140/epjb/e2009-00014-x2-s2.0-67349239426EspositoA.LuisierM.FreyM.SchenkA.A nonparabolicity model compared to tight-binding: the case of square silicon quantum wires200953337638210.1016/j.sse.2009.01.0122-s2.0-61349187605Shao-WenG.Jun-ChengC.Song-LinF.An emphasis of electron energy calculation in quantum wells200442343543910.1088/0253-6102/42/3/435PokatilovE. P.FonoberovV. A.BalabanS. N.FominV. M.Electron states in rectangular quantum well wires (single wires, finite and infinite lattices)200012429037905210.1088/0953-8984/12/42/3092-s2.0-0034292598JaffalA.RegrenyP.PatriarcheG.ChauvinN.GendryM.Density-controlled growth of vertical InP nanowires on Si (111) substrates2020313535400310.1088/1361-6528/ab9475Betancourt-RieraR.Betancourt-RieraR.Ferrer-MorenoL. A.Sañu-GinarteA. D.Theory of electron Raman scattering in a semiconductor core/shell quantum well wire20195639310010.1016/j.physb.2019.04.0042-s2.0-85064199012AktasŞ.BozF. K.BilekkayaA.OkanS. E.The electronic properties of a coaxial square GaAs/AlxGa1−xAs quantum well wire in an electric field20094181572157610.1016/j.physe.2009.04.0372-s2.0-67649207606TkachN. V.PronishinI. V.MakhanetsA. M.Spectrum of an electron in a superlattice along a cylindrical quantum wire199841217818410.1007/BF02766566LimaF. M. S.NunesO. A. C.FonsecaA. L. A.AmatoM. A.da SilvaE. F.JrEffect of a terahertz laser field on the electron-DOS in a GaAs/AlGaAs cylindrical quantum wire: finite well model20082312612503810.1088/0268-1242/23/12/1250382-s2.0-58149475679RaduA.Transverse laser dressing effects on the subband density of states in a 20 nm-wide GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As quantum well wire2012447-81446145310.1016/j.physe.2012.03.0092-s2.0-84861755919NagB.R.GangopadhyayS.Energy levels in quantum wires with finite barrier potential199317946310.1002/pssb.22217902212-s2.0-84990719413TsetseriM.TriberisG. P.A study of the ground state of quantum wires using the finite difference method2002321799010.1006/spmi.2002.10602-s2.0-0742318561DeyasiA.BhattacharyyaS.DasN. R.A finite-difference technique for computation of electron states in core-shell quantum wires of different configurations20148961106580410.1088/0031-8949/89/6/0658042-s2.0-84901252664ArsoskiV. V.ČukarićN. A.TadićM. Ž.PeetersF. MAn efficient finite-difference scheme for computation of electron states in free-standing and core–shell quantum wires2004197172610.1016/j.cpc.2015.08.0022-s2.0-84942984060AbramowitzM.StegunI.A.197210thNew York, NY, USADoverHarrisonP.20054thHoboken, NY, USAJohn Wiley624DaviesJ.1997Cambridge, UKCambridge University Press41041110.1017/CBO9780511819070.014BaymatovP. J.AbdulazizovB. T.Concentration dependences of the electron effective mass, fermi energy, and filling of subbands in doped InAs/AlSb quantum wells2017621465010.15407/ujpe62.01.00462-s2.0-85011630090BastardG.1991New York, NY, USAJohn Wiley & SonsEkenbergU.Nonparabolicity effects in a quantum well: Sublevel shift, parallel mass, and Landau levels198940117714772610.1103/physrevb.40.77142-s2.0-0001187205GulyamovG.ErkaboevU. I.GulyamovA. G.Influence of pressure on the temperature dependence of quantum oscillation phenomena in semiconductors201720176674785310.1155/2017/67478532-s2.0-85017165941AdachiS.Material parameters of In1−xGaxAsyP1−yand related binaries198253128775879210.1063/1.3304802-s2.0-0020296889RobertsonJ.FalabrettiB.Band offsets of high K gate oxides on III-V semiconductors200610001411110.1063/1.22131702-s2.0-33746281113HartH. Q.TuC. W.Optical property of InAsP/InP strained quantum wells grown on InP (111)Band (100) substrates19947594673467910.1063/1.3559202-s2.0-0028423832SaravananS.John PeterA.Phonon effects on interband optical transitions in InAs 0.8 P 0.2 /InP quantum wire2016169869210.1016/j.jlumin.2015.08.0432-s2.0-84941978717LeeI.MeyerJ. R.Ram-MohanL. R.Band parameters for III-V compound semiconductors and their alloys200189115815587510.1063/1.13681562-s2.0-0035356466LeonelliR.TranC. A.BrebnerJ. L.Optical and structural properties of metalorganic-vapor-phase-epitaxy-grown InAs quantum wells and quantum dots in InP19934815111351114310.1103/PhysRevB.4811135KentP. R. C.ZungerA.Biaxial strain-modified valence and conduction band offsets of zinc-blende GaN, GaP, GaAs, InN, InP, and InAs, and optical bowing of strained epitaxial InGaN alloys200281234377437910.1063/1.15242992-s2.0-0037011481