Analytical Cellular Pathology
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 828646, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/828646

Research Article

Polymorphisms of Homologous Recombination RAD51, RAD51B, XRCC2, and XRCC3 Genes and the Risk of Prostate Cancer

Maria Nowacka-Zawisza,¹ Ewelina Wiśnik,1,2 Andrzej Wasilewski,1,3 Milena Skowrońska,¹ Ewa Forma,¹ Magdalena Bryś,¹ Waldemar Różański,⁴ and Wanda M. Krajewska¹

¹Department of Cytobiochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-236 Lodz, Poland
²Department of Biophysics of Environmental Pollution, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-236 Lodz, Poland
³Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, 92-215 Lodz, Poland
⁴2nd Department of Urology, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Postgraduate Training, Medical University of Lodz, 93-513 Lodz, Poland

Received 29 April 2015; Revised 10 July 2015; Accepted 15 July 2015

Academic Editor: Francesco A. Mauri

Copyright © 2015 Maria Nowacka-Zawisza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may induce individual variations in DNA repair capacity, which may in turn contribute to the risk of cancer developing. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) plays a critical role in maintaining chromosomal integrity and protecting against carcinogenic factors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between prostate cancer risk and the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genes involved in HRR, that is, RAD51 (rs1801320 and rs1801321), RAD51B (rs10483813 and rs3784099), XRCC2 (rs3218536), and XRCC3 (rs861539). Polymorphisms were analyzed by PCR-RFLP and Real-Time PCR in 101 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma and 216 age- and sex-matched controls. A significant relationship was detected between the RAD51 gene rs1801320 polymorphism and increased prostate cancer risk. Our results indicate that the RAD51 gene rs1801320 polymorphism may contribute to prostate cancer susceptibility in Poland.

1. Introduction

Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed malignant disease in men and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death among men worldwide, with an estimated 10948 (14.3%) registered new cases and 4199 (8%) deaths in 2012 in Poland [1]. Although prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men, the genetic defects underlying its pathogenesis remain poorly understood. While being over 65 years and the presence of a family history are the strongest risk factors for prostate cancer, ethnicity has also been shown to be a risk factor, with the lowest incidence rates of prostate cancer being observed in Asian men, particularly in India, China, and Japan. Higher incidence rates are seen in black men. The risk of developing prostate cancer is thought to be 1.3–2.0 times higher in African-American than Caucasian men [2].

Genetic defects in DNA repair and DNA damage response genes often lead to an increase of cancer incidence. The most deleterious form of DNA damage is the DNA double-strand break (DSB), which can be formed by free radicals derived from the metabolism, ionizing radiation, or DNA cross-linking agents or which can naturally occur during DNA replication. Unrepaired DSBs lead to mutations, rearrangements, and/or loss of chromosomes, causing genome instability and the development of tumors or cell death. In order to maintain genetic stability, DNA double-strand breaks must be repaired by homologous recombination or nonhomologous end-joining. The key protein in homologous recombination is RAD51, which displaces replication protein A (RPA) and forms a helical nucleofilament on the exposed single-stranded DNA flanking the DSB. This nucleofilament performs a homology search for repair template and then catalyses DNA strand invasion [3, 4].

RAD51 is a homologue of the RecA protein and contains 339 amino acids. The RAD51 gene is located at human chromosome 15q15.1 and is highly polymorphic. Five RAD51 paralogs, that is, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, and XRCC3, have been identified in the human genome. They are key components of homologous recombination, and their loss can result in the development of genetic instability. The RAD51 paralogs form two major complexes, RAD51B-RAD51C-RAD51D-XRCC2 (BCDX2) and RAD51C-XRCC3 (CX3), as well as two subcomplexes, RAD51B-RAD51C (BC) and RAD51D-XRCC2 (DX2). The CX3 complex is known to catalyze strand exchange in vitro. Similarly, the BC subcomplex of the BCDX2 complex has been reported to have in vitro RAD51 mediator activity and the DX2 subcomplex has been reported to have strand exchange activity. However, the specific activities of the RAD51 paralog complexes and subcomplexes have not been defined in vivo [5–7].

The genetic variations of RAD51 and its paralogs may contribute to the development of cancer, as has been shown in the case of breast, ovarian, endometrial, colorectal, and head and neck cancer and acute leukemia [8–11].

The aim of the work was to evaluate the significance of common genetic variation in four genes involved in DNA double-strand break repair via homologous recombination, that is, RAD51, RAD51B, XRCC2, and XRCC3, in prostate cancer susceptibility, tagging six most widely studied single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these genes. The association between the presence of polymorphisms rs1801320 and rs1801321 of RAD51, rs10483813 and rs3784099 of RAD51B, rs3218536 of XRCC2, and rs861539 of XRCC3 and the risk of prostate cancer was examined.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Subjects

The study included 101 men with prostate adenocarcinoma and 216 sex- and age-matched persons who have not been diagnosed with cancer to serve as a control group. Peripheral blood from the patients with prostate adenocarcinoma was collected at the 2nd Department of Urology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland, between October 2009 and December 2011. Peripheral blood from the control group was obtained from the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Hospital, Zgierz, Poland. Blood samples were collected on EDTA and frozen. The clinical characteristics of the prostate cancer patients and controls are presented in Table 1. None of the patients underwent any anticancer treatment. The samples were obtained in accordance with guidelines concerning ethical and legal requirements. Informed consent was obtained from patients, and the studies were approved by the Independent Ethical Committees of the Medical University of Lodz, Poland (RNN/59/09/KE), and the University of Lodz, Poland (KBBN-UŁ/II/25/2012).

Table 1: Clinical characteristic of studied material.

Prostate cancer patients
Control group

Age (year)

    Range
49–86
43–84

    Mean ± SD
71 ± 9
63 ± 9

    Median
71
63

PSAT (ng/mL)

    Range
4.01–1489
0.004–3.94

    Mean ± SD
59.96 ± 182.67
1.09 ± 0.88

    Median
10.57
0.90

2.2. DNA Isolation

DNA was isolated from the blood samples from the prostate adenocarcinoma patients and controls using an AxyPrep Blood Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Axygen, USA) and the phenol-chloroform method. DNA purity and quantity were estimated by UV-spectroscopy (Eppendorf BioPhotometer TM Plus, Eppendorf, Germany). DNA purity was determined by the 260/280 nm absorbance ratio, with a value between 1.8 and 2.0 being acceptable.

2.3. Genotyping

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the RAD51 (rs1801320 and rs1801321), RAD51B (rs10483813 and rs3784099), XRCC2 (rs3218536), and XRCC3 (rs861539) genes were analyzed (Table 2).

Table 2: SNPs analyzed.

Gene
Polymorphism
Other names
SNP position
Chromosome
Global MAF
Method

RAD51
rs1801320
c. -98G>C 
G135C
UTR-5, Exon
15:40695330
13.04%
PCR-RFLP

rs1801321
c. -61G>T, G172T
UTR-5, Exon
15:40695367
26.63%
Real-Time PCR

RAD51B
rs10483813
c. 1037-29918T>A
Intron
14:68564567
12.49%
Real-Time PCR

rs3784099
c. 757-8674G>A
Intron
14:68283210
37.79%
Real-Time PCR

XRCC2
rs3218536
c. 563G>A, p. Arg188His
Missense
7:152648922
4.27%
PCR-RFLP

XRCC3
rs861539
c. 722C>T, p. Thr241Met
Intron, Missense
14:103699416
25.07%
PCR-RFLP

The genotyping of rs1801320, rs3218536, and rs861539 polymorphisms was determined by PCR-RFLP. The primers and PCR conditions for the polymorphic sites of these genes are shown in Table 2. The PCR was run in 10 μL reactions containing 10 ng of genomic DNA, 0.2 mM of each primer, 2.5 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), 3 U HOT FIREPol DNA polymerase, and 1x Solis BioDyne buffer B1. The primers were synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich (USA), and PCR reagents were obtained from Solis BioDyne (Estonia) and Applied Biosystems (USA). Thermal cycling was performed as follows: initial activation at 95°C for 12 min, followed by 30 amplification cycles consisting of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 64°C (rs3218536, rs861539) or 65°C (rs1801320) for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min.

To genotype the rs1801320, rs3218536, and rs861539 polymorphisms, 10 μL of each PCR product was digested with either 2 U of MvaI (BstNI) (Thermo Scientific, USA), 1 U of SexAI (New England Biolabs Inc., USA), or 0.5 units of NlaIII (New England Biolabs Inc., USA), respectively, for 16 h at 37°C. The genotypes were determined by running the digested products in 3% agarose gel with ethidium bromide (1 μL/mL) for UV visualization. The products for each genotype of the tested genes are shown in Table 3. Examples of the obtained restriction patterns are presented in Figure 1.

Table 3: Details of PCR-RFLP of the studied SNPs.

SNP
Primer sequences
Annealing temp. (°C)
Product size (bp)
Enzyme
Genotype
Fragment sizes (bp)

rs1801320
(F) 5′TGGGAACTGCAACTCATCTGG3′ 
(R) 5′GCGCTCCTCTCTCCAGCAG3′

GG
71, 86

65
157
MvaI
GC
71, 86, 157

CC
157

rs3218536
(F) 5′CGTCAATGGAGGAGAAAGTGTG3′ 
(R) 5′TCGAGAGGCATGAGAAGGTT3′

GG
166

64
166
SexA1
GA
79, 87, 166

AA
79, 87

rs861539
(F) 5′TAAGAAGGTCCCCGTACTCC3′ 
(R) 5′CTGCGCATCAACCAGGTGAG3′

CC
34, 161

64
195
NlaIII
CT
56, 105, 161

TT
56, 105

Figure 1: Genotyping of rs1801320, rs3218536, and rs861539 polymorphisms by PCR-RFLP.

The rs1801321, rs10483813, and rs3784099 polymorphisms were genotyped by Real-Time PCR (Mastercycler ep realplex, Eppendorf USA) using TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems). The PCR amplification was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations in 10 μL reactions containing 10 ng of genomic DNA, 0.25 μL SNP Genotyping Assay Mix (40x) (rs1801321 Assay ID: C_7482700_10; rs10483813 Assay ID: C_2564845_10; rs3784099 Assay ID: C_27481679_10), and 5 μL TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (2x). The amplification conditions consisted of initial AmpliTaq Gold 1 activation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 amplification cycles consisting of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s and annealing/extension at 60°C for 1 min.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The chi-square test was used to analyze the Hardy-Weinberg frequencies for the RAD51, RAD51B, XRCC2, and XRCC3 genotypes in the control and patients populations. The differences in genotype and allele frequency between prostate cancer patients and controls were also evaluated with the chi-square test. The odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined through unconditional multiple logistic regression. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistica version 9.0 (StatSoft, Poland).

3. Results

The study comprised 101 prostate cancer cases and 216 sex- and age-matched controls. The genotypes of six genetic variants of the RAD51, RAD51B, XRCC2, and XRCC3 genes were determined. The genotypes and allele frequencies for each polymorphism of the studied genes are summarized in Table 4. The observed genotype frequencies were found to be consistent with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at all studied polymorphic loci, except for the RAD51 polymorphism. No statistically significant differences were found between prostate cancer patients and cancer-free controls with regard to the distribution of genotypes and alleles, apart from the rs1801320 polymorphism of the RAD51 gene.

Table 4: Distribution of genotypes and allele frequency in the RAD51, RAD51B, XRCC2, and XRCC3 loci among prostate cancer patients.

Gene
Genotype/allele
Prostate cancer patients
()
Control group
()

RAD51 
rs1801320
GG
66
172
0.017

GC
27
37

CC
8
7

G
159
381
0.002

C
43
51

rs1801321
GG
39
67
0.392

TG
4
8

TT
58
141

G
82
421
0.058

T
120
290

RAD51B 
rs10483813
TT
56
134
0.350

TA
40
68

AA
5
14

T
152
336
0.481

A
50
96

rs3784099
GG
49
122
0.225

GA
41
80

AA
11
14

G
139
324
0.102

A
63
108

XRCC2 
rs3218536
GG
90
196
0.648

GA
11
20

AA
0
0

G
191
412
0.800

A
11
20

XRCC3 
rs861539
CC
54
119
0.776

CT
34
75

TT
13
22

C
142
313
0.574

T
60
119

The genotype frequencies for each polymorphism, in both the prostate cancer group and the control group, were analyzed using a logistic regression model (Table 5). Among the six polymorphisms examined, the rs1801320 RAD51 gene polymorphism was found to be significantly associated with prostate cancer susceptibility. The rs1801320 RAD51 gene polymorphism was verified by sequencing analysis with BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kits version 1.1 (see Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/828646). Heterozygous (OR = 1.90) and homozygous (OR = 2.98) C genotype variants and C allele (OR = 2.02, ) appeared to increase prostate cancer risk.

Table 5: Genotype distribution and prostate cancer risk for the RAD51, RAD51B, XRCC2, and XRCC3 polymorphisms in prostate cancer patients and control group.

Genotype/allele
Prostate cancer patients
()
Control group
()
OR [95% Cl]
value

rs1801320

    GG
66 (65.3)
172 (79.5)
1 [Ref.]

    GC
27 (26.7)
37 (17.3)
1.90 [1.07–3.37]
0.03

    CC
8 (8.0)
7 (3.2)
2.98 [1.04–8.54]
0.04

    G
159 (78.7)
381 (88.2)
1 [Ref.]

    C
43 (21.3)
51 (11.8)
2.02 [1.29–3.16]
<0.01

rs1801321

    GG
39 (38.6)
67 (31.0)
1 [Ref.]

    TG
4 (4.0)
8 (3.7)
0.86 [0.24–3.04]
1

    TT
58 (57.4)
141 (65.3)
0.71 [0.43–1.16]
0.17

    G
82 (40.6)
142 (32.9)
1 [Ref.]

    T
120 (59.4)
290 (67.1)
0.72 [0.51–1.01]
0.06

rs10483813

    TT
56 (55.4)
134 (62.0)
1 [Ref.]

    TA
40 (39.6)
68 (31.5)
1.41 [0.85–2.32]
0.18

    AA
5 (5.0)
14 (6.5)
0.85 [0.29–2.49]
0.78

    T
152 (75.2)
336 (77.8)
1 [Ref.]

    A
50 (24.8)
96 (22.2)
1.15 [0.78–1.70]
0.48

rs3784099

    GG
49 (48.5)
122 (56.5)
1 [Ref.]

    GA
41 (40.6)
80 (37.0)
1.28 [0.77–2.11]
0.34

    AA
11 (10.9)
14 (6.5)
1.96 [0.83–4.61]
0.12

    G
139 (68.8)
324 (75.0)
1 [Ref.]

    A
63 (31.2)
108 (25.0)
1.36 [0.94–1.97]
0.10

rs3218536

    GG
90 (89)
196 (90.7)
1 [Ref.]

    GA
11 (11.0)
20 (9.3)
1.20 [0.55–2.60]
0.65

    AA
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
—

    G
191 (94.6)
412 (95.4)
1 [Ref.]

    A
11 (5.4)
20 (4.6)
1.19 [0.56–2.53]
0.65

rs861539

    CC
54 (53.5)
119 (55.1)
1 [Ref.]

    CT
34 (33.7)
75 (34.7)
1.00 [0.60–1.68]
1.00

    TT
13 (12.8)
22 (10.2)
1.30 [0.61–2.78]
0.49

    C
142 (70.3)
313 (72.5)
1 [Ref.]

    T
60 (29.7)
119 (27.5)
1.11 [0.77–1.61]
0.57

The association between the C allele of RAD51 gene rs1801320 polymorphism and the age and PSAT serum level of the cancer patients was analyzed. No statistically significant relationship was found between the presence of the C allele for rs1801320 and either age or PSAT serum level (Table 6).

Table 6: Relationship between C allele for the RAD51 gene rs1801320 polymorphism and patient’s age and PSAT level.

rs1801320
Age
OR [95% Cl]
value
PSAT
OR [95% Cl]
value

≤71
>71
<4–10
>10

G
86
16
1 [Ref.]
0.05
77
21
1 [Ref.]
0.88

C
73
27
1.99 [0.99–3.97]
82
22
0.98 [0.50–1.93]

4. Discussion

Despite the high incidence of prostate cancer, the exact cause of its development is not known. It is assumed that, as in the case of other cancers, prostate cancer occurs as a result of the interaction between environmental factors and genetic predisposition. The standard biomarker associated with prostate pathology is prostate specific antigen (PSA). PSA is a kallikrein-like serine protease secreted by the epithelial cells of the prostate and encoded by an androgen-responsive gene (19q 13.3–13.4). The major role of PSA is the liquefaction of human semen by its proteolytic activity. However, because of the low specificity of PSA, unnecessary biopsies and mistaken diagnoses frequently occur. As prostate cancer has a variety of features, prognosis following diagnosis is greatly variable. Hence, there is a need for new biomarkers to improve clinical management of prostate cancer [12].

DNA is replicated with extremely high fidelity in normal cells, with a mutation rate of 10⁻¹⁰ per base pair per cell division. DNA damage typically occurs through exposure to genotoxic chemicals, ultraviolet and ionizing radiation, failures in normal cellular DNA processing and replication events (stalled replication forks), and spontaneous DNA-damaging events. These processes contribute to oxidation, alkylation, cross-linking, and dimerization and cause strand breaks in DNA, whose repair is essential for maintaining the integrity of the genome and preventing cancer. The DNA double-strand break is the most lethal form of DNA damage, as it can lead to significant DNA damage by multiple genomic changes, including translocation, deletion, and amplification, resulting in heritable cellular genomic instability that can lead to malignancy [12, 13].

The repair of a double-strand DNA break is performed by homologous recombination. This process is promoted by recombinase RAD51, which catalyzes the key reactions that typify HRR, that is, homology search and DNA strand invasion. Several RAD family members, including its paralogs RAD51B, XRCC2, and XRCC3, assist RAD51 in this process [14–16].

There is a growing body of evidence, which suggests that polymorphic variants of genes involved in DNA repair could modulate DNA repair capacity and thus have a great impact on genomic stability and cancer prevention. Human RAD51 and its paralogs RAD51B, XRCC2, and XRCC3 are highly polymorphic. The RAD51 polymorphisms c. -98G>C (rs1801320; 135G>C) and c. -61G>T (rs1801321; 172G>T) are two of the most common polymorphisms and are located at 5′UTR. Although the functional consequence of the c. -98G>C polymorphism is unknown, it is speculated that because it alters a CpG island pattern in the promoter region, it may regulate the expression of RAD51 and its mRNA levels. The c. -61G>T is located in a binding site for the transcription factor P300/CBP. Current models suggest that the binding of P300/CBP cofactors to transcription factor activation domains positions histone acetyltransferases near specific nucleosomes in the promoter regions of the target gene. In contrast to the c. -61T allele, the c. -61G allele does not form a binding site for cis-transcriptional elements for P300/CBP. Thus, the presence of the T allele results in a greater effect on RAD51 gene expression [17–19].

It was found that the RAD51 polymorphism rs1801320 is associated with an elevated risk of breast [20–22] and triple-negative breast cancer [23] and ovarian [24, 25], endometrial [26–28], colorectal [9, 29, 30], gastric [31], and head and neck cancer [32, 33] and myelodysplastic syndrome [34], as well as keratoconus and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy [35]. The significance of the RAD51 polymorphism rs1801320 has been best characterized in patients with breast cancer, especially in carriers of BRCA2 gene mutations. Antoniou et al. [17] report that the risk of developing breast cancer increases in the case of a polymorphic variant c. -98G>C and the presence of mutations in the BRCA2 gene. No correlations of this polymorphism were found in carriers of BRCA1 gene mutations. These results are confirmed by numerous studies [36–39]. However, on the contrary, Wang et al. [40] observe that the RAD51 gene rs1801320 polymorphism reduces the risk of developing ovarian cancer in carriers of the BRCA2 mutations. In addition, Ribeiro Junior et al. [41] indicate that the rs1801320 polymorphism of RAD51 gene is associated with a decreased risk of developing myelodysplastic syndrome. No correlation was found between the presence of the RAD51 rs1801321 polymorphism and the risk of developing endometrial and ovarian cancer [28, 42]. However, the variant c. -61G>T in the RAD51 gene seems to affect the development of breast and triple-negative breast cancer, acute myeloid leukemia, and head and neck cancer [32, 43–46].

The RAD51B gene encodes one of five RAD51 paralogs, which play an important role in DNA repair through homologous recombination. RAD51B-deficient chicken B lymphocyte DT40 cells have been observed to impair homologous recombination and are sensitive to cross-linking agents. It has been suggested that RAD51B promotes the assembly of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filaments during HRR. Inactivation of RAD51B by translocation between chromosomes 12 and 14 is a frequent finding in uterine leiomyoma, supporting a role for the inactivation of RAD51B in tumorigenesis [47]. In the case of the RAD51B gene, a correlation has been demonstrated between the presence of the rs3784099 polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer [48]. The relationship between the RAD51B gene rs10483813 polymorphic variants and risk of triple-negative breast cancer and age-related macular degeneration has also been indicated [49, 50].

The XRCC2 and XRCC3 genes are recognized as essential parts of the homologous recombination repair pathway. They are required for correct chromosome segregation and apoptotic response to DSB [51, 52]. A meta-analysis of data from available literature revealed no direct relationship between polymorphic variants rs3218536 of the XRCC2 gene and the risk of breast cancer [53]. However, the XRCC2 Arg188His polymorphism (c. 563G>A; rs3218536) is suggested to modify the risk of breast cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer [20, 54, 55]. A correlation was found between the prevalence of the XRCC2 gene rs3218536 polymorphism and morbidity of triple-negative breast cancer in the female population in Poland [55]. The XRCC2 gene rs3218536 polymorphism has been found to possibly increase the risk of developing cervical cancer and breast cancer in women in Pakistan [11, 56]. In contrast, no direct relation was observed between the occurrence of rs3218536 variant of the XRCC2 gene and the incidence of lung cancer or sporadic colorectal cancer [57, 58]. Similarly, no correlation has been found with hereditary colon cancer, known as Lynch syndrome [59].

The Thr241Met substitution is the most thoroughly analyzed polymorphism in the XRCC3 gene (c. 722C>T; rs861539). Although the functional relevance of the XRCC3 Thr241Met variation is unknown, some studies have reported that this polymorphism is associated with increased risk of breast cancer [20]. A meta-analysis has revealed that the XRCC3 gene rs861539 polymorphism also increases the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as head and neck, bladder, and breast cancer [11, 32, 33, 60–62]. However, this polymorphism has also been shown to have a weak association with the risk of breast cancer as well as lung cancer [63, 64] and no connection with the development of ovarian, cervical, or colorectal cancer or renal cell carcinoma [9, 65–67]. No direct relationship has been found between the XRCC3 gene rs861539 polymorphism and the risk of leukemia in the general population. However, studies performed in Asian populations have implicated it in the risk of incidence of leukemia [68].

The results of the present study show that the RAD51 gene rs1801320 polymorphism doubles the risk of prostate cancer in the studied population. Statistically significant differences in allele distribution were identified between the control group and prostate cancer patients (). Dhillon et al. [69] do not report any such correlation in an Australian population. Hence, the RAD51 gene rs1801320 polymorphism may act as an independent biomarker of prostate cancer risk in Polish population.

No associations were found between the polymorphic variants of the RAD51B, XRCC2, and XRCC3 genes evaluated in the present study and the susceptibility of prostate cancer. However, considering that the occurrence of cancer is the result of complex interactions between genetic changes and environmental factors, polymorphic variants of the RAD51B, XRCC2, and XRCC3 genes other than those studied may yet have an impact on the development of prostate cancer.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

U. Wojciechowska, J. Didkowska, and W. Zatoński, Cancer in Poland in 2012, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Polish National Cancer Registry, Warsaw, Poland, 2014.

National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, Prostate Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, UK, 2014.

Y. Kitagishi, M. Kobayashi, and S. Matsuda, “Defective DNA repair systems and the development of breast and prostate cancer,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2013.

H. Serra, O. Da Ines, F. Degroote, M. E. Gallego, and C. I. White, “Roles of XRCC2, RAD51B and RAD51D in RAD51-independent SSA recombination,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 9, no. 11, Article ID e1003971, 2013.

J. Chun, E. S. Buechelmaier, and S. N. Powell, “Rad51 paralog complexes BCDX2 and CX3 act at different stages in the BRCA1-BRCA2-dependent homologous recombination pathway,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 387–395, 2013.

S. Paulíková, M. Chmelařová, J. Petera, V. Palička, and A. Paulík, “Hypermethylation of RAD51L3 and XRCC2 genes to predict late toxicity in chemoradiotherapy-treated cervical cancer patients,” Folia Biologica, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 240–245, 2013.

S. Shi, L. Qin, M. Tian et al., “The effect of RAD51 135 G>C and XRCC2 G>A (rs3218536) polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk among Caucasians: a meta-analysis,” Tumor Biology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 5797–5804, 2014.

D. Cheng, H. Shi, K. Zhang, L. Yi, and G. Zhen, “RAD51 gene 135G/C polymorphism and the risk of four types of common cancers: a meta-analysis,” Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 9, article 18, 2014.

R. Krupa, T. Sliwinski, M. Wisniewska-Jarosinska et al., “Polymorphisms in RAD51, XRCC2 and XRCC3 genes of the homologous recombination repair in colorectal cancer—a case control study,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2849–2854, 2011.

L. Miao, X. F. Qian, G. H. Yang, and L. D. Zhao, “Relationship between RAD51-G135C and XRCC3-C241T single nucleotide polymorphisms and onset of acute myeloid leukemia,” Journal of Experimental Hematology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 605–611, 2015.

Z. Qureshi, I. Mahjabeen, R. M. Baig, and M. A. Kayani, “Correlation between selected XRCC2, XRCC3 and RAD51 gene polymorphisms and primary breast cancer in women in Pakistan,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 10225–10229, 2014.

M. Esfahani, N. Ataei, and M. Panjehpour, “Biomarkers for evaluation of prostate cancer prognosis,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2601–2611, 2015.

L. R. Ferguson, H. Chen H, A. R. Collins et al., “Genomic instability in human cancer: molecular insights and opportunities for therapeutic attack and prevention through diet and nutrition,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, 2015.

L. Krejci, V. Altmannova, M. Spirek, and X. Zhao, “Homologous recombination and its regulation,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 13, pp. 5795–5818, 2012.

J. San Filippo, P. Sung, and H. Klein, “Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 77, pp. 229–257, 2008.

C. S. Walsh, “Two decades beyond BRCA1/2: homologous recombination, hereditary cancer risk and a target for ovarian cancer therapy,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 343–350, 2015.

A. C. Antoniou, O. M. Sinilnikova, J. Simard et al., “RAD51 135G→C modifies breast cancer risk among BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from a combined analysis of 19 studies,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1186–1200, 2007.

L. Hasselbach, S. Haase, D. Fischer, H.-C. Kolberg, and H.-W. Stürzbecher, “Characterisation of the promoter region of the human DNA-repair gene Rad51,” European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 589–598, 2005.

D. Chekravarti, V. J. LaMorte, M. C. Nelson et al., “Role of CBP/P300 in nuclear receptor signalling,” Nature, vol. 383, no. 6595, pp. 99–103, 1996.

H. Romanowicz-Makowska, B. Smolarz, M. Zadrozny et al., “The association between polymorphisms of the RAD51-G135C, XRCC2-Arg188His and XRCC3-Thr241Met genes and clinico-pathologic features in breast cancer in Poland,” European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 145–150, 2012.

H. Sun, J. Bai, F. Chen et al., “RAD51 G135C polymorphism is associated with breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 22,399 subjects,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 157–161, 2011.

B.-B. Zhang, D.-G. Wang, C. Xuan, G.-L. Sun, and K.-F. Deng, “Genetic 135G/C polymorphism of RAD51 gene and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis of 28,956 cases and 28,372 controls,” Familial Cancer, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 515–526, 2014.

B. Smolarz, M. Zadrozny, J. Duda-Szymańska et al., “RAD51 genotype and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) risk in Polish women,” Polish Journal of Pathology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2013.

H. Romanowicz-Makowska, B. Smolarz, D. Samulak et al., “A single nucleotide polymorphism in the 5′ untranslated region of RAD51 and ovarian cancer risk in Polish women,” European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 406–410, 2012.

B. Smolarz, M. Makowska, D. Samulak et al., “Association between polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene RAD51 and ovarian cancer,” Polish Journal of Pathology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 290–295, 2013.

R. Krupa, A. Sobczuk, T. Popławski, K. Wozniak, and J. Blasiak, “DNA damage and repair in endometrial cancer in correlation with the hOGG1 and RAD51 genes polymorphism,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1163–1170, 2011.

M. M. Michalska, D. Samulak, H. Romanowicz, and B. Smolarz, “Association of polymorphisms in the 5′ untranslated region of RAD51 gene with risk of endometrial cancer in the Polish population,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 290, no. 5, pp. 985–991, 2014.

B. Smolarz, D. Samulak, M. Michalska et al., “135G>C and 172G>T polymorphism in the 5′ untranslated region of RAD51 and sporadic endometrial cancer risk in Polish women,” Polish Journal of Pathology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 157–162, 2011.

S. Nissar, S. M. Baba, T. Akhtar, R. Rasool, Z. A. Shah, and A. S. Sameer, “RAD51 G135C gene polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer in Kashmir,” European Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 264–268, 2014.

H. Romanowicz-Makowska, D. Samulak, M. Michalska et al., “RAD51 gene polymorphisms and sporadic colorectal cancer risk in Poland,” Polish Journal of Pathology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 193–198, 2012.

T. Popławski, M. Arabski, D. Kozirowska et al., “DNA damage and repair in gastric cancer—a correlation with the hOGG1 and RAD51 genes polymorphisms,” Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, vol. 601, no. 1-2, pp. 83–91, 2006.

M. A. Kayani, S. Khan, R. M. Baig, and I. Mahjabeen, “Association of RAD51 135 G/C, 172 G/T and XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphisms with increased risk of head and neck cancer,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 10457–10462, 2014.

T. Śliwiński, A. Walczak, K. Przybyłowska et al., “Polymorphisms of the XRCC3 C722T and the RAD51 G135C genes and risk of a head and neck cancer in a Polish population,” Experimental and Molecular Pathology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 358–366, 2010.

Y.-Z. He, X. Hu, X.-S. Chi et al., “Association between RAD51 gene polymorphism (-135G/C) and susceptibility of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute leukemia: evidence based on a meta-analysis,” Tumor Biology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 615–621, 2014.

E. Synowiec, K. A. Wojcik, J. Izdebska et al., “Polymorphisms of the homologous recombination gene RAD51 in keratoconus and fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy,” Disease Markers, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 353–362, 2013.

L. Kadouri, Z. Kote-Jarai, A. Hubert et al., “A single-nucleotide polymorphism in the RAD51 gene modifies breast cancer risk in BRCA2 carriers, but not in BRCA1 carriers or noncarriers,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 2002–2005, 2004.

E. Levy-Lahad, A. Lahad, S. Eisenberg et al., “A single nucleotide polymorphism in the RAD51 gene modifies cancer risk in BRCA2 but not BRCA1 carriers,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 3232–3236, 2001.

E. Synowiec, J. Stefańska, Z. Morawiec, J. Blasiak, and K. Wozniak, “Association between DNA damage, DNA repair genes variability and clinical characteristics in breast cancer patients,” Mutation Research, vol. 648, no. 1-2, pp. 65–72, 2008.

W. Wang, J.-L. Li, X.-F. He et al., “Association between the RAD51 135 G>C polymorphism and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis of 19,068 cases and 22,630 controls,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e75153, 2013.

W. W. Wang, A. B. Spurdle, P. Kolachana et al., “A single nucleotide polymorphism in the 5′ untranslated region of RAD51 and risk of cancer among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 955–960, 2001.

H. L. Ribeiro Junior, R. T. de Oliveira, A. R. Maia et al., “Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes are related to the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndrome,” Hematological Oncology, 2014.

A. Auranen, H. Song, C. Waterfall et al., “Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and epithelial ovarian cancer risk,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 611–618, 2005.

B. Kuschel, A. Auranen, S. McBride et al., “Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer susceptibility,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1399–1407, 2002.

K.-M. Lee, J.-Y. Choi, C. Kang et al., “Genetic polymorphisms of selected DNA repair genes, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and breast cancer risk,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 4620–4626, 2005.

M. M. Michalska, D. Samulak, H. Romanowicz, and B. Smolarz, “Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of RAD51-G172T and XRCC2-41657C/T homologous recombination repair genes and the risk of triple- negative breast cancer in Polish women,” Pathology & Oncology Research, 2015.

S. Rollinson, A. G. Smith, J. M. Allan et al., “RAD51 homologous recombination repair gene haplotypes and risk of acute myeloid leukaemia,” Leukemia Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 169–174, 2007.

K. A. W. Wadt, L. G. Aoude, L. Golmard et al., “Germline RAD51B truncating mutation in a family with cutaneous melanoma,” Familial Cancer, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 337–340, 2015.

X. O. Shu, J. Long, W. Lu et al., “Novel genetic markers of breast cancer survival identified by a genome-wide association study,” Cancer Research, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1182–1189, 2012.

J. D. Figueroa, M. Garcia-Closas, M. Humphreys et al., “Associations of common variants at 1p11.2 and 14q24.1 (RAD51l1) with breast cancer risk and heterogeneity by tumor subtype: findings from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 20, no. 23, Article ID ddr368, pp. 4693–4706, 2011.

J. Zhou, D. Wang, J. Zhang et al., “RAD51 gene is associated with advanced age-related macular degeneration in Chinese population,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 46, no. 16-17, pp. 1689–1693, 2013.

N. Bashir, S. Sana, I. Mahjabeen, and M. A. Kayani, “Association of reduced XRCC2 expression with lymph node metastasis in breast cancer tissues,” Familial Cancer, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 611–617, 2014.

Y. Z. Song, F. J. Han, M. Liu et al., “Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in XRCC3 and radiation-induced adverse effects on normal tissue: a meta-analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 6, Article ID e0130388, 2015.

K.-D. Yu, A.-X. Chen, L.-X. Qiu, L. Fan, C. Yang, and Z.-M. Shao, “XRCC2 Arg188His polymorphism is not directly associated with breast cancer risk: evidence from 37,369 subjects,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 219–225, 2010.

S. N. Silva, M. Tomar, C. Paulo et al., “Breast cancer risk and common single nucleotide polymorphisms in homologous recombination DNA repair pathway genes XRCC2, XRCC3, NBS1 and RAD51,” Cancer Epidemiology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2010.

B. Smolarz, M. Makowska, D. Samulak et al., “Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of XRCC2 and XRCC3 homologous recombination repair genes and triple-negative breast cancer in Polish women,” Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 151–157, 2015.

L. O. Pérez, A. Crivaro, G. Barbisan, L. Poleri, and C. D. Golijow, “XRCC2 R188H (rs3218536), XRCC3 T241M (rs861539) and R243H (rs77381814) single nucleotide polymorphisms in cervical cancer risk,” Pathology & Oncology Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 553–558, 2013.

K. Curtin, W.-Y. Lin, R. George et al., “Genetic variants in XRCC2: new insights into colorectal cancer tumorigenesis,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 2476–2484, 2009.

R. J. Hung, D. C. Christiani, A. Risch et al., “International Lung Cancer Consortium: pooled analysis of sequence variants in DNA repair and cell cycle pathways,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3081–3089, 2008.

S. G. Reeves, C. Meldrum, C. Groombridge et al., “DNA repair gene polymorphisms and risk of early onset colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome,” Cancer Epidemiology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 183–189, 2012.

S. Costa, D. Pinto, D. Pereira et al., “DNA repair polymorphisms might contribute differentially on familial and sporadic breast cancer susceptibility: a study on a Portuguese population,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 209–217, 2007.

H.-C. Luo, H.-B. Zhang, X.-J. Xin, and W.-X. Huang, “Haplotype-based case-control study of DNA repair gene XRCC3 and hepatocellular carcinoma risk in a Chinese population,” Tumor Biology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 3415–3419, 2014.

Q. Ma, Y. Zhao, S. Wang et al., “Genetic polymorphisms of XRCC3 Thr241Met (C18067T, rs861539) and bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 18 research studies,” Tumor Biology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1473–1480, 2014.

P. Ding, Y. Yang, L. Cheng et al., “The relationship between seven common polymorphisms from five DNA repair genes and the risk for breast cancer in northern Chinese women,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e92083, 2014.

R. J. Hung, D. C. Christiani, A. Risch et al., “International lung cancer consortium: pooled analysis of sequence variants in DNA repair and cell cycle pathways,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3081–3089, 2008.

V. Margulis, J. Lin, H. Yang, W. Wang, C. G. Wood, and X. Wu, “Genetic susceptibility to renal cell carcinoma: the role of DNA double-strand break repair pathway,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 2366–2373, 2008.

C. L. Pearce, A. M. Near, D. J. van den Berg et al., “Validating genetic risk associations for ovarian cancer through the international Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 412–420, 2009.

L. O. Pérez, A. Crivaro, G. Barbisan, L. Poleri, and C. D. Golijow, “XRCC2 R188H (rs3218536), XRCC3 T241M (rs861539) and R243H (rs77381814) single nucleotide polymorphisms in cervical cancer risk,” Pathology and Oncology Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 553–558, 2013.

Y. Yan, H. Liang, T. Li et al., “Association of XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and leukemia risk: evidence from a meta-analysis,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2130–2134, 2014.

V. S. Dhillon, M. Phil, E. Yeoh, and M. Fenech, “DNA repair gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in South Australia—results of a pilot study,” Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 641–646, 2011.