Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 3610543, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3610543

Research Article

Classical Polymerization of the Schwarzschild Metric

Babak Vakili1,2

¹Research Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics of Maragha (RIAAM), Maragha, P.O. Box 55134-441, Iran
²Department of Physics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence should be addressed to Babak Vakili; b.vakili@iauctb.ac.ir

Received 31 May 2018; Accepted 5 September 2018; Published 20 September 2018

Guest Editor: Farook Rahaman

Copyright © 2018 Babak Vakili. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP³.

Abstract.

We study a spherically symmetric setup consisting of a Schwarzschild metric as the background geometry in the framework of classical polymerization. This process is an extension of the polymeric representation of quantum mechanics in such a way that a transformation maps classical variables to their polymeric counterpart. We show that the usual Schwarzschild metric can be extracted from a Hamiltonian function which in turn gets modifications due to the classical polymerization. Then, the polymer corrected Schwarzschild metric may be obtained by solving the polymer-Hamiltonian equations of motion. It is shown that while the conventional Schwarzschild space-time is a vacuum solution of the Einstein equations, its polymer-corrected version corresponds to an energy-momentum tensor that exhibits the features of dark energy. We also use the resulting metric to investigate some thermodynamical quantities associated with the Schwarzschild black hole, and in comparison with the standard Schwarzschild metric the similarities and differences are discussed.

1. Introduction

One of the most important arenas that show the power of general relativity in describing the gravitational phenomena is the classical theory of black hole physics. However, when we introduce the quantum considerations to study of a gravitational systems, general relativity does not provide a satisfactory description of the physics of the system. The phenomena such as black hole radiation and all kinds of cosmological singularities are among the phenomena in which the use of quantum mechanics in their description is inevitable. This means that although general relativity is a classical theory, in its most important applications, the system under consideration originally obeys the rules of quantum mechanics. Therefore, any hope in the accurate description of gravitational systems in high energies depends on the development of a complete theory of quantum gravity. That is why the quantum gravity is one of the most important challenges in theoretical physics which from its DeWitt’s traditional canonical formulation [1] to the more modern viewpoints of string theory and loop quantum gravity (LQG) [2–4] has gone a long way. One of the main features of the space-time proposed in LQG is its granular structure which in turn, supports the idea of existence of a minimal measurable length. In the absence of a full theory of quantum gravity, effective theories which somehow exhibit quantum effects in gravitational systems play a significant role. These are theories which show some phenomenological aspects of quantum gravity and usually use a certain deformation in their formalism. For example, theories like generalized uncertainty principles and noncommutative geometry are in this category [5–13].

Among the effective theories that also use a minimal length scale in their formalism, we can mention the polymer quantization [14], which uses the methods very similar to the effective theories of LQG [15]. In polymer quantum approach a polymer length scale, , which shows the scale of the segments of the granular space, enters into the Hamiltonian of the system to deform its functional form into a so-called polymeric Hamiltonian. This means that, in a polymeric quantized system in addition of a quantum parameter , which is responsible to canonical quantization of the system, there is also another quantum parameter that labels the granular properties of the underlying space. This approach then opened new windows for the theories which are dealing with the quantum gravitational effects in physical systems such as quantum cosmology and black hole physics; see, for instance [16–31] and the references therein.

To polymerize a dynamical system one usually begins with a classical system described by Hamiltonian . The canonical quantization of such a system transforms its Hamiltonian to an Hermitian operator, which now contains the parameter , in such a way that in the limit , the quantum Hamiltonian returns to its classical counterpart. By polymerization, the Hamiltonian gets an additional quantum parameter , which is rooted in the ideas of granular structure of the space-time. Therefore, by taking the classical limit of the resulting Hamiltonian , we arrive at a semiclassical theory in which the parameter is still present. To achieve the initial classical theory, one should once again take the limit from this intermediate theory. It is believed that such effective classical theories have enough rich structure to exhibit some important features of the system related to the quantum effects without quantization of the system. The process by which the theory is obtained from the classical theory is called classical polymerization. A detailed explanation of this process with some of its cosmological applications can be found in [32].

In this paper, we are going to study how the metric of the Schwarzschild black hole gets modifications due to the classical polymerization. Since the thermodynamical properties of the black hole come from its geometrical structure, the corrections to the black hole’s geometry yield naturally modifications to its thermodynamics. To do this, we begin with a general form of a spherically symmetric space-time and then construct a Hamiltonian in such a way that the Schwarzschild metric is resulted from the corresponding Hamiltonian equations of motion. We then follow the procedure described above and by applying it to the mentioned Hamiltonian we get the classical polymerized Hamiltonian, by means of which we expect to obtain the polymer-corrected Schwarzschild metric. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we have presented a brief review of the polymer representation and classical polymerization. Section 3 is devoted to the Hamiltonian formalism of a general spherically symmetric space time. We show in this section that the resulting Hamiltonian equations of motion yield the Schwarzschild solution. In Section 4, we will apply the classical polymerization on the Hamiltonian of the spherically symmetric space-time given in Section 3 to get the polymerized Hamiltonian. We then construct the deformed Hamiltonian equations of motion and solve them to arrive the polymer corrected Schwarzschild metric. The energy-momentum tensor of the matter field corresponding to this metric as well as some of its thermodynamical properties are also presented in this section. The radial geodesics of the light and particles are obtained in Section 5 and, finally, we summarize the results in Section 6.

2. Classical Polymerization: A Brief Review

As is well known, in Schrödinger picture of quantum mechanics, the coordinates and momentum representations are equivalent and may be easily converted to each other by a Fourier transformation. However, in the presence of the quantum gravitational effects the space-time may take a discrete structure so that such well-defined representations are no longer applicable. As an alternative, polymer quantization provides a suitable framework for studying these situations [14, 15]. The Hilbert space of this representation of quantum mechanics is , where is the Haar measure and denotes the real discrete line whose segments are labeled by an extra dimension-full parameter such that the standard Schrödinger picture will be recovered in the continuum limit . This means that, by a classical limit , the polymer quantum mechanics tends to an effective -dependent classical theory which is somehow different from the classical theory from which we have started. Such an effective theory may also be obtained directly from the standard classical theory, without referring to the polymer quantization, by using of the Weyl operator [32]. The process is known as polymerization with which we will deal with in the rest of this paper.

According to the mentioned above form of the Hilbert space of the polymer representation of quantum mechanics, the position space (with coordinate ) has a discrete structure with discreteness parameter . Therefore, the associated momentum operator , which is the generator of the displacement, does not exist [15]. However, the Weyl exponential operator (shift operator) corresponding to the discrete translation along is well defined and effectively plays the role of momentum associated to [14]. This allows us to utilize the Weyl operator to find an effective momentum in the semiclassical regime. So, considering a state , its derivative with respect to the discrete position may be approximated by means of the Weyl operator as [32]

and similarly the second derivative approximation will be

Having the above approximations at hand, we define the polymerization process for the finite values of the parameter as

This replacement suggests the idea that a classical theory may be obtained via this process, but now without any attribution to the Weyl operator. This is what is dubbed usually as classical Polymerization in literature [14, 32]:

where now are a pair of classical phase space variables. Hence, by applying the transformation (4) to the Hamiltonian of a classical system we get its classical polymerized counterpart. A glance at (4) shows that the momentum is periodic and varies in a bounded interval as . In the limit , one recovers the usual range for the canonical momentum . Therefore, the polymerized momentum is compactified and topology of the momentum sector of the phase space is rather than the usual [33]. Our set-up to explain the classical polymerization of a dynamical system is now complete. In Section 4, we will return to this issue by some more explanations and apply it to the Hamiltonian dynamics of a spherically symmetric space-time.

3. Hamiltonian Model of the Spherically Symmetric Space-Time

We start with the general spherically symmetric line element as (it can be shown that, by introducing of new radial and time coordinates as and , this metric takes the standard form of static spherically symmetric line elements: ) [34, 35]

where , , , and are some functions of . Upon substitution this metric into the Einstein-Hilbert action

the action taking the form

where [34, 35]

is an effective Lagrangian in which the primes denote differentiation with respect to and the Lagrange multiplier is given by

In metric (5) the function plays the role of a lapse function with respect to the -slicing in the ADM terminology; see [34–36]. On the other hand, according to the relation (9), the functions and are related to the Lagrange multiplier which means that we can arbitrarily choose them. This is a reflection of this fact that we have freedom in the definition of the coordinates and in the metric (5). Hence, the only independent variables that can be determined by the Einstein field equations are the functions and . In order to write the Hamiltonian the momenta conjugate to these variables should be evaluated, that is,

Also, the momentum associated with vanishes which gives the primary constraint

In terms of these conjugate momenta the canonical Hamiltonian is given by its standard definition , leading to

in which due to existence of the constraint (11) we have added the last term that is the primary constraints multiplied by an arbitrary functions . The Hamiltonian equation for then reads

Now, let us restrict ourselves to a certain class of gauges, namely, , which is equivalent to the choice . With a constant we assume without losing general character of the solutions. By this choice, the Hamiltonian equations of motion for the other variables are as

From the second and third equations of (14) we obtain

from which one gets

where and are integration constants. Upon substituting these results into the first and fourth equations of the system (14), we arrive at the following system:

which results and then . Therefore,

In which after integration we obtain

and

with and being integration constants. Now, all of the above results should satisfy the constraint equation . Thus, with the help of (12) we get , where we fix them as . Also, and remain arbitrary where we take their values as and with being a constant. Therefore, the metric functions take the form

and their conjugate momenta are

Finally, with using these relations in (5) and (9), the metric is obtained as

In the final stage we have to eliminate the function . This function should be interpreted as a Lagrange-multiplier and, thus, cannot be considered as a real dynamical variable. As we mentioned before, one may freely choose it. From the physical point of view the function corresponds to a gauge freedom in choice of coordinates and in the above metric. If we choose the lapse function as this metric takes its canonical form

which is nothing but the familiar form for the metric of the Schwarzschild black hole. However, we may identify the line element (23) with the Eddington-Finkelstein metric

for , or with some other kinds of spherically symmetric metrics for ; see [37]. In summary, from physical viewpoint choosing different gauge functions is actually looking at a space-time from a different perspective. For example, the metric (25) can be obtained from (24) by introducing a new time coordinate in which the radial null geodesics (see Section 5) become straight lines. In this sense, the two metrics may differ from some aspects. While the Schwarzschild metric is singular at the Eddington-Finkelstein metric is regular not only at but also for the whole range . Indeed, the coordinate range is extended from to .

From now on we focus on Schwarzschild black hole metric and to justify the meaning of the constant , noting that the Newtonian gravitational potential of a point mass situated at the origin is given by the relation . On the other hand in the weak-field limit the component of the metric takes the form [38]. Therefore, comparing this with (24) we see that . This means that we may interpret the constant as due to the mass of the above mentioned point particle in relativistic units.

4. Polymerization of the Model

As explained in the second section the method of polymerization is based on the modification of the Hamiltonian to get a deformed Hamiltonian , where is the deformation parameter. Quantum polymerization of the spherically symmetric space-time is studied in [39, 40] in which the interior of the Schwarzschild black hole as described by a Kantowski-Sachs cosmological model is quantized by loop quantization method. For our system this method will be done by applying the transformation (4) on the Hamiltonian (12). However, since all of the thermodynamical properties of the black hole are encoded in the function , we will polymerize only the -sector of the Hamiltonian. So, by means of the transformation

the Hamiltonian takes the form

As we mentioned earlier, by this one-parameter -dependent classical theory, we expect to address the quantum features of the system without a direct reference to the quantum mechanics. Indeed, here instead of first dealing with the quantum pictures based on the quantum Hamiltonian operator, one modifies the classical Hamiltonian according to the transformation (4) and then deals with classical dynamics of the system with this deformed Hamiltonian. In the resulting classical system the discreteness parameter plays an essential role since its supports the idea that the -correction to the classical theory is a signal from quantum gravity. Under these conditions the Hamiltonian equations of motion for the above Hamiltonian are

The second and the third equations of this system give , integration of which results in , where is an integration constant. We note that, in the limit , this relation should back to , obtained in the previous section. So, taking this limit fixes the integration constant as . Therefore,

Now, we may use this result in the second equation of (28) to arrive at

whose integral is

From (29) we get . With the help of these relations (31) takes the following algebraic form for the function :

which admits the exact solution

Up to second order of , we have

Now, let us go back to the first and the fourth equations of the system (28). Using (29), they take the form

and

in which we have used the trigonometric relations: and . From these two equations we get

where up to second order of , using (34) is

and thus

We may use this relation in (35) to get a differential equation for . However, since the resulting equation seems to be too complicated to have an exact solution, we rely on an approximation according to which we ignore all powers of in the r.h.s. of (35) and so obtain

or after differentiation of both sides

with solution

where and are two integration constant and is the imaginary error function. Up to second order of this expression has the form

comparison of which with (21) suggests that the integration constants should fix as and . So,

Therefore, by choosing the lapse function in the form (see the discussion after (23)), the polymerized metric takes the form

where and are given in (44) and (34), respectively. It is seen that in the limit the line element (45) returns to the usual Schwarzschild metric (24). However, its asymptotic behavior, which comes from the expansion

shows that, in spite of the Schwarzschild case, the metric is not flat for large values of . Later in this section, we attribute such an asymptotic behavior to the matter field that created this metric. In what follows, we will deal with the physical properties, including thermodynamics, of the space-time (45). Since such properties of a black hole can be derived from its geometry, we expect that the deformed forms of these properties return to their ordinary form in the limit .

At first, let us take a look at the horizon(s) radius of the metric (45) which may be deduced from the roots of equation . Up to the leading order of parameter , the positive root of this equation is

On the other hand since , the function is monotonically increasing and thus the metric cannot have more than one horizon whose radius is approximately given in (47). To see the behavior of the above metric near the Schwarzschild essential singularity , we may evaluate some scalars associated with the metric such as Ricci scalar , , and the Kretschmann scalar . A straightforward calculation shows that

where is the Dawson function. Near , the above relation behaves as , so given that the value of the parameter is also very small we have . Computing of the scalar shows the similar behavior near , while the Kretschmann scalar takes the form

which behaves as . Thus near we have . This shows that the space-time described by the metric (45) has an essential singularity at , which cannot be removed by a coordinate transformation.

Now, let us investigate the properties of the matter corresponding to the metric (45). Considering the Einstein equations , the components of the energy-momentum tensor become

Before going any further, a remark is in order. The usual Schwarzschild metric is often considered a vacuum solution since it solves which is equivalent to the Einstein vacuum field equations . However, as (50) explicitly shows the polymer corrected metric (45) is not a vacuum solution. Then, a question arises: what mechanism made it possible starting from a vacuum solution we get a nonvacuum solution? To deal with this question note that any vacuum solution must be found in the absence of matter, strictly speaking, only the Minkowski metric can be considered as a vacuum solution. As shown in [41], in the Schwarzschild case there is a source term (energy-momentum tensor) concentrated on the origin, the origin which usually excluded from the space-time manifold. So we are faced with an unacceptable physical situation in which a curved metric is generated by a zero energy-momentum tensor. In [41] with more accurate calculations based on distributional techniques the energy-momentum tensor of the Schwarzschild geometry is obtained and it has been shown that its Ricci scalar is equal to which yields an energy-momentum tensor proportional to . Now, what is happening in the effective theories such as noncommutative, see [42], and polymeric counterparts of the Schwarzschild solution is that the concentrated matter on the origin will spread throughout space by the polymer parameter (or noncommutative parameter in noncommutative theories).

The energy-momentum tensor (50) shows a fluid with radial pressure and tangential pressure . In comparison with the conventional perfect fluid with isotropic pressure the above energy-momentum tensor shows an unusual behavior since its pressure exhibits an anisotropic behavior. At short distances the difference between and is of order , which shows that the fluid behaves approximately like a perfect fluid. However, when grows the anisotropy between the pressure’s components increases and the behavior of the fluid is far from the perfect fluid behavior. The nonvanishing radial pressure of the above anisotropic fluid may be interpreted as a result of the quantum fluctuation of given space-time. The large amount of this pressure near the origin prevents the matter collapsing into this point. Such an unusual equation of state for fluids also appeared in the noncommutative theories of black holes [42]. In view of the validity of the energy conditions, we see that

which shows the violation of the strong energy condition for this exotic distribution of matter. On the other hand, in view of the weak energy conditions, while the relation is always satisfied, the condition is violated for . The violation of the energy conditions shows that the classical description of this type of matter field is not credible and thus the corresponding gravity should be described by an effective quantum theory (here the polymerized theory) rather than the usual general relativity.

Finally, let us take a quick look at thermodynamics of the metric (45). According to the Hawking formulation the black hole’s temperature is proportional to the surface gravity at the black hole horizon. It can be shown that for a diagonal metric such as (45) the surface gravity is [43]

Evaluating this expression at the horizon radius (47) gives the temperature as

In Figure 1 we have plotted the qualitative behavior of the above results. As this figure shows near the origin the matter has a dense core like its conventional Schwarzschild counterpart. Thus, the temperature changes like Schwarzschild in this regime. However, in a global look, the exotic properties of the matter cause different behavior for temperature. Unlike the usual Schwarzschild case, by decreasing the mass, the radiation temperature first decreases to a minimum value and then exhibits the normal behavior; i.e., the temperature increases while the mass is decreasing. The reason for this abnormal behavior in the temperature of the radiation may be found in the nature of the dark energy-like of the matter field described by the energy-momentum tensor (50). Now, by the second law of thermodynamics , we may compute the entropy as

We see that this integral cannot be evaluated analytically. In Figure 2, employing numerical methods, we have shown the approximate behavior of the entropy for typical values of the parameters. As the figure shows with decreasing mass, the entropy grows from negative values up to a maximum positive value and then behaves like the Schwarzschild case and decreases to zero.

Figure 1: Left: Temperature versus mass. The solid line shows the qualitative behavior of the relation (53) while the dashed line refers to the conventional temperature of the Schwarzschild black hole. Right: the density of the matter distribution versus . The figures are plotted for and .

Figure 2: The entropy versus mass. The figure is plotted for and .

5. Geodesics of the Polymerized Metric

In this section we are going to study how light and particles will move in the geometrical background given by metric (45). This is important because from the classical trajectories of light or falling particles we understand that the corresponding space-time behaves really like a black hole. First, consider the radial null geodesics are defined by and . Therefore, we have

In order to get an analytical solution we use the approximate , for which we obtain

For , the above expression with positive (negative) sign shows that increases (decreases) as increases and thus the corresponding curve is an outgoing (incoming) radial null geodesics. For , the situation is reversed; i.e., the positive and negative signs correspond to the incoming and outgoing curves, respectively; see Figure 3. A glance at this figure makes it clear that none of the null geodesics can pass through the horizon which shows the black hole nature of the underlying space-time. It is clear that in comparison with region the local light cones tip over in region . This is because while the coordinates and are space-like and time-like, respectively, in region and in region they reverse their character. The orientation of the light cones inside the horizon shows that nothing can stay at rest in this region but will be forced to move towards the black hole center.

Figure 3: Left: the outgoing (dashed line) and incoming (solid line) geodesics for . Right:tThe outgoing (solid line) and incoming (dashed line) geodesics . The figures are plotted for and .

To complete our geodesics analysis, let us now consider the radial trajectory of a falling free particle. It moves along the time-like geodesics which results the following equations of motion [38]:

where a dot denotes differentiation with respect to the proper time and is a constant that depends on the initial conditions. If we assume that the particle begins to fall with zero initial velocity from a distance for which , then . Also, for the motion around this region we have . Therefore, we may analyse the path of the particle in view of a comoving observer which uses the proper time. Then, (57) and (58) give

in which we have used the same previous approximation for . Upon integration we get

where is an integration constant and is a Hypergeometric function. The above equation shows that in view of the proper observer no singular behavior occurs at the horizon radius and the particle falls to the center of the black hole; see Figure 4. If instead one describes the motion in terms of the coordinate time , the situation becomes like the null geodesics; i.e., in view of a distance observer the particle cannot pass through the horizon and it takes infinite time for the falling particle to reach the horizon, so that is approached but never passed. All of these results show that in terms of light and particles motion the space-time given by the metric (45) behaves like a black hole as its Schwarzschild counterpart.

Figure 4: The trajectory of an infalling particle in terms of the proper time . The particle falls continuously to the singularity in a finite proper time. The figure is plotted for and .

6. Summary

In this paper we have studied the classical polymerization procedure applied on the Schwarzschild metric. This procedure is based on a classical transformation under which the momenta are transformed like their polymer quantum mechanical counterpart. After a brief review of the polymer representation of quantum mechanics, we have introduced the classical polymerization by means of which the Hamiltonian of the theory under consideration gets modification in such a way that a parameter , coming from polymer quantization, plays the role of a deformation parameter. In order to apply this mechanism on the Schwarzschild black hole, we first presented a Hamiltonian function for a general spherically symmetric space-time and showed that the resulting Hamiltonian equations yield the conventional Schwarzschild metric. Then, we have applied the polymerization on this minisuperspace model and solved the Hamiltonian equations once again to achieve the polymer corrected Schwarzschild metric. We saw that while the usual Schwarzschild metric is a vacuum spherical symmetric solution of the Einstein equations, this is not the case for its polymerized version obtained by the above mentioned method. Interestingly, the energy-momentum tensor of the matter field corresponding to the polymerized metric has anisotropic negative pressure sector with a dark energy-like equation of state. As expected, the unusual behavior of such a matter field resulted in an uncommon behavior for the thermodynamical quantities like temperature and entropy in comparison with the traditional Schwarzschild solution. Finally, to clarify that the polymerized metric has also the black hole nature, we have investigated the null geodesics and verified that the outgoing and incoming geodesics curves can never pass through the horizon. Also, we proved that in view of a comoving observer which uses the proper time an infalling particle continuously falls to the center , without experiencing something passing through the horizon. All these indicate that the underlying space-time in which the light and particles are traveling is really a black hole.

Data Availability

No data were used to support of the author’s study in the manuscript: Classical Polymerization of the Schwarzschild Metric.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported financially by Research Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics of Maragha (RIAAM) under research project no. 1/5237-107.

References

B. S. DeWitt, “Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canonical theory,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 160, 1967.

C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, “Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 442, no. 3, pp. 593–619, 1995.

A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, “Quantum theory of geometry. I. Area operators,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 14, no. 1A, pp. A55–A81, 1997.

C. Rovelli, “Loop quantum gravity,” Living Reviews, vol. 1, p. 1, 1998.

A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1108–1118, 1995.

S. Hossenfelder, “Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 16, no. 2, 2013.

A. Kempf, “Quantum field theory with nonzero minimal uncertainties in positions and momenta,” High Energy Physics, vol. 11-12, pp. 1041–1048, 1994.

A. Kempf and G. Mangano, “Minimal length uncertainty relation and ultraviolet regularization,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 55, no. 12, 1997.

S. Hossenfelder, “Interpretation of quantum field theories with a minimal length scale,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 73, no. 10, 2006.

J. B. Achour and S. Brahma, “Covariance in self dual inhomogeneous models of effective quantum geometry: Spherical symmetry and Gowdy systems,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 97, 2018.

M. Bojowald, S. Brahma, and J. D. Reyes, “Covariance in models of loop quantum gravity: spherical symmetry,” Physical Review D: Covering Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 92, no. 4, 2015.

P. Nicolini, A. Smailagic, and E. Spallucci, “Noncommutative geometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole,” Physics Letters B, vol. 632, no. 4, pp. 547–551, 2006.

E. Spallucci, A. Smailagic, and P. Nicolini, “Trace anomaly on a quantum spacetime manifold,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 73, 2006.

A. Corichi, T. Vukašinac, and J. A. Zapata, “Polymer quantum mechanics and its continuum limit,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 76, no. 4, 2007.

A. Ashtekar, S. Fairhurst, and J. L. Willis, “Quantum gravity, shadow states and quantum mechanics,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1031–1061, 2003.

G. De Risi, R. Maartens, and P. Singh, “Graceful exit via polymerization of pre-big-bang cosmology,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 76, no. 10, 2007.

F. Wu and M. Zhong, “TeV scale Lee-Wick fields out of large extra dimensional gravity,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 78, 2008.

G. M. Hossain, V. Husain, and S. S. Seahra, “Nonsingular inflationary universe from polymer matter,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 81, no. 2, 2010.

A. Corichi and A. Karami, “Loop quantum cosmology of k = 1 FRW: A tale of two bounces,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, 2011.

S. M. Hassan and V. Husain, “Semiclassical cosmology with polymer matter,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 34, no. 8, 2017.

B. Vakili, K. Nozari, V. Hosseinzadeh, and M. A. Gorji, “Bouncing scalar field cosmology in the polymeric minisuperspace picture,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 29, no. 32, 2014.

J. B. Achour, F. Lamy, H. Liu, and K. Noui, “Polymer schwarzschild black hole: an effective metric,” Europhysics letters, vol. 123, 2018.

C. G. BOehmer and K. Vandersloot, “Loop quantum dynamics of the Schwarzschild interior,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 76, no. 10, 2007.

A. Peltola and G. Kunstatter, “Effective polymer dynamics of D-dimensional black hole interiors,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 80, no. 4, 2009.

E. Bianchi, “Black hole entropy, loop gravity, and polymer physics,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 11, 2011.

E. R. Livine and D. R. Terno, “Entropy in the classical and quantum polymer black hole models,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 29, no. 22, 2012.

G. Chacón-Acosta, E. Manrique, L. Dagdug, and H. A. Morales-Técotl, “Statistical thermodynamics of polymer quantum systems,” Loop Quantum Gravity and Cosmology, vol. 7, no. 110, p. 23, 2011.

G. M. Hossain, V. Husain, and S. S. Seahra, “Background-independent quantization and the uncertainty principle,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 27, no. 16, 2010.

M. Gorji, K. Nozari, and B. Vakili, “Polymeric quantization and black hole thermodynamics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 735, pp. 62–68, 2014.

M. Gorji, K. Nozari, and B. Vakili, “Thermostatistics of the polymeric ideal gas,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 90, no. 4, 2014.

M. A. Gorji, K. Nozari, and B. Vakili, “Polymer quantization versus the Snyder noncommutative space,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 32, no. 15, 2015.

A. Corichi and T. Vukašinac, “Effective constrained polymeric theories and their continuum limit,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 86, no. 6, 2012.

K. Nozari, M. A. Gorji, V. Hosseinzadeh, and B. Vakili, “Natural cutoffs via compact symplectic manifolds,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 33, no. 2, 2016.

M. Cavaglia, V. De Alfaro, and A. T. Filippov, “Hamiltonian formalism for black holes and quantization,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 661–672, 1995.

M. Cavaglia, V. De Alfaro, and A. T. Filippov, “Quantization of the Schwarzschild black hole,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 227–250, 1996.

B. Vakili, “Quantization of the Schwarzschild black hole: a Noether symmetry approach,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 133–145, 2012.

P. Kraus and F. Wilczek, “Some applications of a simple stationary line element for the Schwarzschild geometry,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 9, no. 40, pp. 3713–3719, 1994.

R. d'Inverno, Introducing Einstein's Relativity, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1998.

A. Corichi and P. Singh, “Loop quantization of the Schwarzschild interior revisited,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 33, no. 5, 2016.

J. Olmedo, S. Saini, and P. Singh, “From black holes to white holes: a quantum gravitational, symmetric bounce,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 34, no. 22, 2017.

H. Balasin and H. Nachbagauer, “The energy-momentum tensor of a black hole, or What curves the Schwarzschild geometry?” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2271–2278, 1993.

P. Nicolini, “Noncommutative black holes, the final appeal to quantum gravity: a review,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 24, no. 7, 2009.

Ø. Grøn and S. Hervik, Einsteins General Theory of Relativity: With Modern Applications in Cosmology, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 2007.