Advances in Medicine

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 547625, 5 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/547625

Research Article

Assessment of the Self-Perception of Dental Appearance, Its Comparison with Orthodontist’s Assessment and Demand for Treatment in Eastern Nepalese Patients

Varun Pratap Singh,¹ Amita Sharma,² and Deepak Kumar Roy³

¹Department of Orthodontics, College of Dental Surgery, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan 7053, Nepal

²Department of Dentistry, SHKM Government Medical College, Mewat, Haryana, India

³Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Surgery, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal

Received 29 May 2014; Accepted 27 July 2014; Published 13 August 2014

Academic Editor: James K. Hartsfield

Copyright © 2014 Varun Pratap Singh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the self-perception of dental appearance among Eastern Nepalese patients using aesthetic component (AC) of the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) and to compare it with that of an orthodontist’s assessment using the same scale and determine whether gender, area of residence, and level of education influence subject’s self-perception and orthodontist’s ratings. Methods. A total of 252 subjects (equal number of male and female) were conveniently selected. The average ages of subjects were years. The level of subject’s perception and orthodontist’s assessment was analyzed by nonparametric Chi square test. Kappa coefficient was done to verify its agreement. The Spearman’s correlation test was used to check the association of educational level and age. Mann-Whitney test was used to check the associations of sex and areas of residence. Results. The demand for treatment was significantly associated with the perception of the subject and orthodontist’s assessment. However, age, gender, and educational level were statistically insignificant in influencing subject perception and orthodontist’s assessment. Conclusion. Patient’s self-perception should be given equal importance while planning orthodontic treatment.

1. Introduction

A person having an attractive smile is appreciated by everyone. People always want to know how they look and what others think about their physical appearance. Therefore, a pleasing smile and an attractive facial appearance help to improve one’s self-esteem and have a positive impact on building social as well as professional relations. One with poor dental appearance may have a negative impact [1].

Enhancing dentofacial esthetics is one of the primary goals of orthodontic treatment. Frequently, people desire orthodontic treatment to address their esthetics concerns [2, 3]. A number of studies have shown that children have developed a self-perception for the need of orthodontic treatment [3–10]. Orthodontic treatment is determined mostly by the objective assessment. The patient’s perception toward seeking a dental treatment is usually ignored [2, 11].

The index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) has two components: one component relates to dental and functional health (dental health component (DHC)) and the other is based on aesthetic impairment of malocclusions (aesthetic component (AC)). The former is concerned only about dental health [12, 13] and the later deals with psychological need for orthodontic treatment [14]. The AC IOTN (Figure 1) consists of ten colorful photos of the occlusion of anterior teeth which is a standard method of assessing dental aesthetics. The data concerning the self-perception of malocclusion and the need of orthodontic treatment are available for many populations, [5–10, 15–20]; however, the perception of malocclusion in Nepalese population is being studied for the first time.

Figure 1: Aesthetic component scale.

The objectives of this study were to

(a)assess the self-perception of dental appearance among Eastern Nepalese population using aesthetic component (AC) of the IOTN index,(b)compare the perception of dental appearance of the subject with orthodontic assessment,(c)determine if gender (male/female) and residence (rural/urban) influence subject’s self-perception and orthodontist’s rating.

2. Methods

A hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted among 252 patients aged 17–29 years. The sample was selected from patients visiting the Department of Orthodontics, College of Dental Surgery, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal, between January 2011 to January 2012. Convenience sampling was done and an equal number of males and females were selected to enable comparison.

The subjects for the study were allowed to assess their own occlusion using color photographs of the aesthetic component. A series of 10 colorful photographs showing the range of dental attractiveness, number 1 having the most and number 10 the least attractive, were put in front of the subject to judge their occlusions and were asked individually to rate their teeth by seeing the photograph. Along with it, the patients were asked about their level of education, number of schooling years, area of residence, and demand for orthodontic treatment. At the same time, the orthodontist rated the subject’s occlusions using the AC scale. Finally, the ratings done by the patient and orthodontist were compared. To make the study more reliable a mirror and a lip retractor were provided to the patient. To make the test more valid, out of 252 subjects, 52 randomly selected subjects were reexamined 6 weeks after their initial examinations. After the ratings were noted, the grades for the treatment need were calculated. The AC has numbers for each photograph which signifies the grades for treatment need (Figure 1). The grades are as follows:

 AC Grade 1–4: no need for treatment, AC Grade 5–7: borderline/moderate need for orthodontic treatment, AC Grade 8–10: definite need for orthodontic treatment.

2.1. Statistical Procedures

A SPSS statistical package (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 17.0) was used to analyze the data. Chi-square test was applied to test the perception of subject and the orthodontist. Kappa coefficient was done to verify its agreement. Spearman’s correlation test was applied to see the association between subject’s and orthodontist’s perception on education level and age. Mann-Whitney test was applied to check the association between subject’s perception and orthodontist’s assessment with respect to areas of living (rural/urban) and gender (male/female).

3. Results

A total of 252 subjects (equal number of male and female) took part in the study. The average age was years. The level of education was schooling years. The subjects consisted of 128 individuals from rural and 124 from urban areas. Treatment was demanded by 123 subjects (Table 1). Figures 2, 3, and 4 show IOTN-AC grading according to patients perception.

Table 1: Showing the descriptive statistics.

Sex
Age
Educational level
Rural/urban
Demand for treatment

M
F
17 to 29 years
10 to 18 years
R
U
D
ND

126
126
Mean—22.33 ± 2.114
Mean—13.83 ± 1.828
128
124
123
129

R: rural; U: urban; D: demand; ND: no demand.

Figure 2: IOTN-AC Grade 1–4: no need for treatment.

Figure 3: IOTN-AC Grade 5–7: borderline/moderate need for orthodontic treatment.

Figure 4: IOTN-AC Grade 8–10: definite need for orthodontic treatment.

There were significant differences between subject’s perception and orthodontist’s rating (). The Kappa agreement was 48.7%. Most of the patients rated them in the “no need” category of IOTN-AC (215 patients) while the orthodontist rated (172 patients) under the same category. However, the orthodontist rated almost thrice the patients in “borderline need” (72 patients orthodontist, 25 patients self-perception) category as compared to the subjects (Table 2). The data were statistically insignificant with respect to age, sex, educational level, and place of residence. However, the demand of treatment was significantly related to the scores assigned by both the subjects and orthodontist (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 2: Comparison of subject’s perception and orthodontist’s assessment of IOTN-AC.

IOTN-AC
Grades
Chi-square nonparametric
Kappa measurement of agreement

No need

(1 to 4)
Borderline need

(5 to 7)
Definitive need

(8 to 10)

Subject’s perception
215
25
12
215.32

Sig. 0.000

0.487

Orthodontist’s assessment
172
72
08

Table 3: Correlation between subject’s perception and orthodontist’s assessment with educational level and age.

Variables
Subject’s perception
Orthodontist’s assessment

CC
Sig. (2 tailed)
CC
Sig. (2 tailed)

Educational level
−0.062
0.325
−0.095
0.132

Age
0.062
0.328
0.024
0.702

CC: correlation coefficient.

Table 4: Effect of variables (rural/urban, sex, and demand) on subject’s perception and orthodontist’s assessment of IOTN-AC.

Asymp. sig (2 tailed)
Layman’s perception
orthodontist’s assessment

Rural/urban
0.510
0.726

Sex
0.875
0.412

Demand
0.000*
0.000*

.

4. Discussion

The results of this study indicated that the orthodontist’s assessment was dissimilar with the subject’s perception. More subjects perceive that they do not need orthodontic treatment as compared to orthodontist’s assessment for “no need” group. The reason may be that layperson tends to have a less critical view of the same malocclusions assessed by the professionals as supported by Shaw et al. [14], Hunt et al. [21], Trivedi et al. [22], and Graber and Lucker [23]. For moderate need group, again there was disparity in orthodontist’s assessment and subject perception with less subjects perceiving moderate need as compared to orthodontist. The reason may be the difficulty for the general population to differentiate between the features of malocclusions such as deep bite and increased overjet while seeing the photograph which is only understood by an expert and is rated in treatment need grade of AC. For definite need group the patients perceived them of having more severe malocclusion as compared to orthodontists and are consistent with Reichmuth et al. [24] who found that subjects rated themselves as having worse occlusion in publicly funded clinics. In this study, it appeared that the gender and age had no significant relation which is similar to the study done by Albarakati [1] in Saudi Arabia. A study done by Aikins et al. [25] to check the self-perception of malocclusion among Nigerian adolescents found that there was no significant relation with respect to gender but adolescents aged 16–18 had an increased level of perception of need. Further, in the same study, males were found to be more in need of treatment by orthodontist. Al-Balkhi and Al-Zahrani [26] also found lack of significant difference between both genders. On the contrary, Burden and Holmes [27] found that there were significantly more males than females who were in need for orthodontics treatment. The present study shows insignificant relation toward the level of education in relation to the perception of subject and the assessment of orthodontist. Unlike the study done by Bellot-Arcís et al. [28] in a Spanish adult population in which it was found that the level of education is statistically significant as the treatment need was more higher in secondary/higher education. The present study also depicts insignificant relation between the perception of subjects and orthodontist’s assessment with areas of residence (rural/urban) which is supported by a study done among north Jordanian school children by Abu Alhaija et al. [10].

This study was conducted in a tertiary health care center in Eastern Nepal which has patients from a wide range of social backgrounds. The sample does not represent the whole population of this age group residing in Eastern region but gives an overview of the assessment of orthodontist and self-perception of subjects who took part in the study.

5. Conclusions

(1)A significant difference was found between the orthodontist’s assessment and perception of subjects regarding the attractiveness of occlusion in this hospital based Nepalese population of patients between ages 17 and 29 years.(2)Age, gender, level of education, and area of living were found to be statistically insignificant factors pertaining to perception of subjects and orthodontist’s assessment.(3)For effective orthodontic care the perception of both subject and professional assessment must be taken into consideration.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

S. Albarakati, “Self perception of malocclusion of Saudi patients using the aesthetic component of the IOTN index,” Pakistan Oral Dental Journal, vol. 27, pp. 45–52, 2007.

P. F. Dias and R. Gleiser, “Orthodontic concerns of Brazilian children and their parents compared to the normative treatment need,” Journal of Oral Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 101–107, 2010.

J. A. Dean, S. M. McDonald, and P. O. Walker, “Public assistance orthodontic treatment needs: a report from the State of Indiana,” Journal of Public Health Dentistry, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 133–137, 2005.

J. F. C. Tulloch, W. C. Shaw, C. Underhill, A. Smith, G. Jones, and M. Jones, “A comparison of attitudes toward orthodontic treatment in British and American communities,” The American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 253–259, 1984.

E. E. Roberts, J. G. Beales, L. Dixon, A. J. Willcocks, and D. R. Willmot, “The orthodontic condition and treatment status of a sample of 14-year-old children in North Derbyshire,” Community Dental Health, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 249–256, 1989.

A. Holmes, “The subjective need and demand for orthodontic treatment,” British Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 287–297, 1992.

I. Grzywacz, “The value of the aesthetic component of the index of orthodontic treatment need in the assessment of subjective orthodontic treatment need,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2003.

E. S. J. Abo Alhaija, K. S. Al-Nimri, and S. N. Al-Khateeb, “Orthodontic treatment need and demand in 12-14-year-old north Jordanian school children,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 261–263, 2004.

E. A. Mugonzibwa, A. M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, M. A. Van 't Hof, and E. N. Kikwilu, “Perceptions of dental attractiveness and orthodontic treatment need among Tanzanian children,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 426–433, 2004.

E. S. J. Abu Alhaija, K. S. Al-Nimri, and S. N. Al-Khateeb, “Self-perception of malocclusion among north Jordanian school children,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 292–295, 2005.

C. M. de Oliveira and A. Sheiham, “The relationship between normative orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 426–436, 2003.

P. H. Brook and W. C. Shaw, “The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 309–320, 1989.

R. Evans and W. Shaw, “Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 314–318, 1987.

W. C. Shaw, S. Richmond, and K. D. O'Brien, “The use of occlusal indices: a European perspective,” The American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1995.

M. S. B. Abdullah and W. P. Rock, “Assessment of orthodontic treatment need in 5,112 Malaysian children using the IOTN and DAI indices,” Community Dental Health, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 242–248, 2001.

M. S. Abdullah and W. P. Rock, “Perception of dental appearance using Index of Treatment Need (Aesthetic Component) assessments,” Community Dental Health, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 161–165, 2002.

H. S. Horowitz, L. K. Cohen, and J. Doyle, “Occlusal relations in children in an optimally fluoridated community. IV. Clinical and social-psychological findings.,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 189–201, 1971.

W. C. Shaw, “Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 151–162, 1981.

P. M. Jenkins, B. S. Feldman, and D. R. Stirrups, “The effect of social class and dental features on referrals for orthodontic advice and treatment.,” British journal of orthodontics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 185–188, 1984.

N. A. Mandall, J. F. McCord, A. S. Blinkhorn, H. V. Worthington, and K. D. O'Brien, “Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self-perceptions in 14-15-year-old Asian and Caucasian children in Greater Manchester,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 175–183, 2000.

O. Hunt, P. Hepper, C. Johnston, M. Stevenson, and D. Burden, “The aesthetic component of the index orthodontic treatment need validated against lay opinion,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2002.

K. Trivedi, T. R. Shyagali, J. Doshi, and Y. Rajpara, “Reliability of aesthetic component of IOTN in the assessment of subjective orthodontic treatment need,” Journal of Advanced Dental Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2011.

L. W. Graber and G. W. Lucker, “Dental esthetic self-evaluation and satisfaction,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 163–173, 1980.

M. Reichmuth, K. A. Greene, M. G. Orsini, G. J. Cisneros, G. J. King, and H. A. Kiyak, “Occlusal perceptions of children seeking orthodontic treatment: impact of ethnicity and socioeconomic status,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 575–582, 2005.

E. A. Aikins, O. O. Dacosta, C. O. Onyeaso, and M. C. Isiekwe, “Self-perception of malocclusion among Nigerian adolescents using the aesthetic component of the IOTN,” The Open Dentistry Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2012.

K. Al-Balkhi and A. Al-Zahrani, “The pattern of malocclusion in Saudi Arabian patients attending for orthodontic treatment of the College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh,” The Saudi Dental Journal, vol. 6, pp. 138–144, 1994.

D. J. Burden and A. Holmes, “The need for orthodontic treatment in the child population of the United Kingdom,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 395–399, 1994.

C. Bellot-Arcís, J. Montiel-Company, D. Manzanera-Pastor, and J. Almerich-Silla, “Orthodontic treatment need in a Spanish young adult population,” Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 638–643, 2012.