Atmospheric Deposition : Sampling Procedures , Analytical Methods , and Main Recent Findings from the Scientific Literature

The atmosphere is a carrier on which some natural and anthropogenic organic and inorganic chemicals are transported, and the wet and dry deposition events are the most important processes that remove those chemicals, depositing it on soil and water. A wide variety of different collectors were tested to evaluate site-specificity, seasonality and daily variability of settleable particle concentrations. Deposition fluxes of POPs showed spatial and seasonal variations, diagnostic ratios of PAHs on deposited particles, allowed the discrimination between pyrolytic or petrogenic sources. Congener pattern analysis and bulk deposition fluxes in rural sites confirmed long-range atmospheric transport of PCDDs/Fs. More and more sophisticated and newly designed deposition samplers have being used for characterization of deposited mercury, demonstrating the importance of rain scavenging and the relatively higher magnitude of Hg deposition from Chinese anthropogenic sources. Recently biological monitors demonstrated that PAH concentrations in lichens were comparable with concentrations measured in a conventional active sampler in an outdoor environment. In this review the authors explore the methodological approaches used for the assessment of atmospheric deposition, from the analysis of the sampling methods, the analytical procedures for chemical characterization of pollutants and the main results from the scientific literature.


Introduction
Atmospheric deposition is the transfer of atmospheric pollutants (dust, particulate matter containing heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins, furans, sulphates, nitrates, etc.) to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and nowadays is receiving more and more attention by the scientific community, becoming the subject of a specific research area in the environmental sciences.The research in atmospheric deposition has increased a great deal over the past years, because of its increasing significant contribution to the explanation of pollution phenomena in many environmental compartments along with the possibility to evaluate the impacts of pollution sources at long and short distance (as in fugitive emissions) and the possibility to carry out longterm studies aimed at performing health impact assessment on exposed population.The atmosphere is the carrier on which some natural and anthropogenic organic and inorganic chemicals are transported, and deposition events are the most important processes that remove those chemicals, depositing it on soil and water surfaces.
The prominent source of aerosols in the atmosphere, at the global scale, is the dust injected from arid regions, followed by soil and marine erosion and the anthropogenic sources [1].
Aerosol deposition occurs through three mechanisms depicted in Table 1 [2,3].In-cloud scavenging removes more than 70% of aerosols in number and more than 99% in mass, 2

Rain washout Within a cloud
In-cloud scavenging or rainout, or droplets nucleation around particles Below a cloud Droplets-particle collision Dry deposition Deposition processes which are not influenced by precipitation

Occult deposition
Water droplets deposited by the interception of fog, mist, or clouds that play a significant role only in the case of frequently cloud-covered zone, or by adjective fog, but are negligible in urban areas whereas weak precipitation, having less than 0.1 mm h −1 intensity, can remove 50-80% of the below-cloud aerosol, in both number and mass within 4 h [4,5].
Deposition rates are governed by meteorological factors (wind velocity, relative humidity), particle characteristics (size and shape), and surface characteristics (friction velocity, microscale roughness, and temperature) [7].
The samplers used to evaluate atmospheric deposition can be differentiated into various categories depending on which deposition is collected: dry (only dry deposition is collected, when there is no precipitation), wet (the sampler collects only during rain), and bulk (wet and dry deposition are collected together).Mosses and lichens are used as "biomonitors" for an indirect assay of atmospheric deposition.
Wet deposition flux is conventionally calculated using the concentration measured in precipitation samples and the amount of precipitation recorded in the analysis period.
Under the approximation that the concentrations of pollutants in precipitation () depend on the concentrations in the air () within which precipitation is formed, the scavenging ratio () is defined as When the amount of precipitation is expressed as , the wet deposition flux (  ) of the pollutant is related to , , and  by Differences in the wet deposition fluxes of the pollutant between two sites may be due to different atmospheric concentrations and scavenging ratios.
In rainy areas dry deposition can be neglected compared with wet deposition [8] or does not basically modify the chemical characteristics of the wet deposition but can be the dominant fraction in arid and semiarid regions where intense dust loadings take place [9][10][11][12] and it is necessary to separate wet and dry deposition.
Dry deposition dominates the atmospheric delivery of particulate matter, total phosphorous, Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , and K + , whereas wet deposition dominates the atmospheric delivery of Na + , total nitrogen, NO 3− , and SO 4 2− [13].Conversely in higher precipitation regime areas, wet deposition reflects long-range transport phenomena, while dry deposition is more linked to local pollution levels [14] and dominates deposition processes of micropollutants in the highly industrialized areas [15].
Presence of particulate SO 4 2− , NO 3 − , and NH 4 + , in the so called "secondary aerosol, " is the result of the reaction between gaseous precursors SO 2 and NO  of anthropogenic origin, with oxidants such as O 3 and OH radicals, toward the formation of H 2 SO 4 -containing aerosol and gaseous HNO 3 , and then to the reaction with NH 3 precursor.This "gas-toparticle" reaction is accompanied by a droplet-to-particle conversion, in which SO 2 and NH 3 produce secondary stable (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 aerosol, whereas NH 4 NO 3 aerosols tend to dissociate under low NH 3 concentrations.These aerosols remain in the atmosphere until removed by wet or dry deposition and due to the residence time (about a week) are responsible for long-range transport of sulphur and nitrogen [18].
Speciation of deposited particle gives the opportunity to study mass balance of some metals as in the case of mercury in Lake Michigan and Lake Superior, which showed that atmospheric deposition contributes largely to the total annual input of mercury [19,20].
Study of atmospheric bulk deposition of PAHs in an urban area reveals the presence of a plume of highest concentrations in zone with heavy vehicular traffic and favourable topography for the concentration of emitted pollutants, like in the active sampling in air, and also the diagnostic ratio analyses apportioned the major source of emissions [21].
Due to the extreme versatility of the analytical tools recently developed in the study of the atmospheric deposition, the existence of numerous methodological approaches, there is the necessity in the studying of the state of the art of this new environmental subject.
In this review, the authors explore the methodological approaches used for the assessment of atmospheric deposition starting from the analysis of the sampling methods, the analytical procedures for chemical characterization of pollutants, and the main results from the scientific literature, dividing pollutants into four major classes, starting from Table 2: List of different collectors used in sampling atmospheric deposition of organic pollutants (PAHs, PCBs, PCDDs/Fs).
organics, followed by inorganics (metals other than mercury, ions), mercury (on which particular focus has been dedicated by researches due to its peculiarity), and biomonitors.

Sampling and Analytical Techniques
2.1.Organics.The atmospheric deposition of organics pollutants, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and furans (PCDDs/Fs), can be estimated using different suitable collectors, as listed in Table 2 [21][22][23][24][25].You can use wetonly collectors that are designed to collect only sedimenting wet particles or bulk ones to collect all sedimenting wet and dry particles, depending both on the aim of the study and on the sampling site (rural, industrial, or urban areas).Glass funnel-bottle bulk collectors, consisting of a cylindrical funnel and a sample collection vessel, were widely used for bulk determinations of PAHs and PCDDs/Fs [21,[23][24][25].
The cylindrical vertical section should be of sufficient height to avoid sampling losses resulting from splashing and the diameter for the opening area and the volume of the collector should be selected, in order to collect all the precipitation for the required sampling duration.Sampling period ranges from one week to one month.The height of the opening area of the collector shall be at least 1.5 m above ground, in order to avoid sample contamination due to ground during heavy rains (Figure 1).The sampled rainwater was stored in a refrigerator at 2 ∘ C until analysis.When the volume reached 2 L, the bottles were immediately transported to the laboratory.After that, samples were filtered with precleaned (heated at 450 ∘ C for 24 h) Whatman GF/F filters (0.7 m, 47 mm i.d.).Stainless steel buckets were used to collect PAHs bulk deposition in remote, rural village, and urban areas [23].Distilled water was added into the buckets before sampling, and the amount of distilled water was determined according to the evaporation and precipitation situation, generally 50 mL in summer and winter, and 100 mL in the other seasons.About 60 mL glycol was also added into each bucket to avoid freezing of water in winter and to reduce the effects of biodegradation.
Alternatively to previous collector, bulk deposition samples can be collected with a stainless steel platter whose diameter and depth were 60-76 cm and 19 cm, respectively [22,26].
The collection of bulk deposition of PAHs was achieved by Li et al. [27] using a stainless steel funnel with an area of 0.049 m 2 attached to a glass filter setup.The funnel was placed horizontally, 1.2 m above the ground level.After about 30 days, the inner surfaces of the stainless steel funnels were wiped with precleaned cotton.The cotton and filter (Whatman, Grade GF/F, pore size 0.7 mm, diameter 90 mm, Advances in Meteorology and thickness 420 mm) were combined together as particlebounded deposition fluxes of PAHs.
A passive sampling technique using a funnel-absorbercartridge device was adopted and validated in the field by Gocht et al. to monitor the atmospheric deposition of PAHs in rural regions of Southern Germany [28].The sampling system consists of a borosilicate glass funnel and a large adsorption cartridge packed with Amberlite IRA-743 (15 g of the absorber material which was fixed on top and at the bottom with glass wool plugs).While bulk deposition percolates through the funnel and cartridge, PAHs from both the water and particle phases are collected from the wet and dry deposition by adsorption and filtration, respectively.In the field, the sampling systems were housed in an aluminum box.After each sampling period, funnels were purged with 200 mL acetone in order to collect adsorbed and deposited PAHs from the glass surfaces.The cartridges were sequentially solvent extracted in four steps (50 mL for each) with the same acetone used before for the cleaning of the funnels (i.e., the purge solution).The IRA-743 resin bulk sampler was also used for the monitoring of long-term bulk deposition of PCBs, PBDEs, and PCDD/Fs [23,29].Alternatively to the previous collector, Hovmand et al. have used a tube filled with XAD-2 and connected to a borosilicate glass funnel for monitoring bulk deposition flux of PCDDs/Fs and PCBs [30].
Automatic wet-only collectors can be used to collect PAHs only during the precipitation events [31].The sampler contains a humidity sensor which controls the lid of wet and dry collector compartments automatically.During the wet deposition events, the sensor moves the lid onto the dry collector and after the sensor surface becomes dry, the lid on the dry collector goes onto the wet collector.The aluminum cylindrical container installed into the dry collector compartment was filled with 3 L of distilled water to collect both particulate and gas-phase PAHs.In addition, it is possible to collect dry and wet depositions separately, using two sampling devices consisting of two vessels equipped with a rain sensor capable of triggering the cover, so as to protect the dry sample and collect the wet deposition in the other container [15].

Inorganics.
The atmospheric deposition of inorganics pollutants, such as ions and metals, has to be estimated using suitable collectors, listed in Table 3.Three different types of collectors can be used: wet-only, bulk, and Bargerhoff.The wet-only collector is designed to collect only sedimenting wet particles, while the bulk and Bargerhoff ones [36] are designed to collect all sedimenting wet and dry particles.The wet-only and bulk collectors are bottle and funnel combinations [37,38] while the Bargerhoff collector is an open bucket.Moreover, there are automatic wet-only collectors which allow collecting only during precipitation events.They consist of a lid that opens and closes over the sample container orifice, a precipitation sensor and a motorized drive mechanism with associated electronic controls.In addition, it is possible to collect dry and wet depositions separately using the samplers equipped with two polyethylene buckets and a lid controlled by a rain sensor, which moves depending on the beginning and the end of the rain event [39].All collectors shall have a cylindrical vertical section of sufficient height to avoid sampling losses resulting from splashing and the diameter for the opening area and the volume of the collector need to be selected in order to collect all the precipitation for the required sampling duration.Typical sampling periods in fact vary from one week to one month, depending on meteorological condition.The height of the opening area of the collector shall be at least 1.5 m above ground in order to avoid the sample contamination due to ground during heavy rains.All parts of collectors shall be made in inert material such as HDPE, in order to avoid metals contaminations and the sample containers must be cleaned prior to sampling with distilled water and a 1% nitric acid solution to eliminate particles deposited or adsorbed onto container walls during prior collections [17,38,40].After the deposition collecting, the sample is transferred to the laboratory in the sampling bottle (wet-only and bulk) or bucket (Bargerhoff), filtered and analyzed.Metals are digested by nitric acid at 200-250 ∘ C for 2 h in microwave system while ions are extracted by deionized water, in sonication system.The digested or extracted samples are finally analyzed by ICP-MS and GF-AAS for metals and by IC for ions quantification [41,42].The sulphate concentrations in atmospheric deposition could be also determined gravimetrically or by using barium chloride (BaCl 2 ).Collected particulate samples are coated with barium chloride (BaCl 2 ) in a vacuum evaporator, whose pressure is maintained below 106 mm Hg.The coated samples were then exposed in a desiccator cabinet to a relative humidity of 85% for 2 h to allow the sulfate present to react with BaCl 2 to form distinctive products (BaSO 4 ) identifiable by SEM [43][44][45][46][47][48].In addition to bulk and wet-only depositions, several techniques of measuring dry deposited material have been reported in literature.These techniques employ a smooth surface plate with a sharp leading edge which is fitted to a galvanized iron stand.This plate made of polyvinyl chloride, and similar to those used in wind tunnel studies, is mounted on a wind vane and is 21.5 cm long, 8 cm wide, and 0.8 cm thick with a sharp leading edge (<10 ∘ angle) pointing toward the wind direction [17,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57].Alternatively, a 33 cm diameter circular PVC plate has been used [53].The sharp leading edge and smooth horizontal surface are supposed to cause the minimum airflow disruption and thus provide an estimation of the lower limit estimation of deposition [49,58].This technique is advantageous to control the sampling time, sample extraction, and parameters estimation.However, there are some limitations for the smooth surface plates.Particles with diameter less than 10 m do not settle well under the influence of gravity, and bounce-off and resuspension might occur.In order to prevent the bouncingoff and resuspension of particles, the plates can be covered with two Mylar strips (7 : 6 × 5 cm 2 ) coated by Apezion L grease (thickness B5 mm) or with projection films [57] coated with approximately 20 mg of silicon grease [52][53][54][55][56].As an alternative, the plain surface can be covered using a doublesided adhesive tape affixed to the Mylar strip [43].Anyway, Mylar strip or overhead projection films have to be cleaned by deionized water or by wiping with methanol-soaked wipes and then immersed in 10% nitric acid followed by methanol, five minutes each.Moreover, before and after exposure, they have to be maintained at a relative humidity of 50% at 25 ∘ C for more than 48 h and then weighed to a precision of 0.0001 g, in order to determine the total mass of collected particles.After the deposition collecting, and before the extraction and analysis of deposited pollutants of interest, the grease on the strip or films has to be eliminated.For this purpose, they are washed with distilled ultrapure hexane which is subsequently evaporated by directing a stream of ultrapure nitrogen on its surface [38,53,54].Dry deposition samples were collected in the water surface sampler (WSS) [59], having a circular open surface area continuously refreshed with recirculated water that enters from the center, overflowed from the weirs at the sides, and collected in the WSS holding tank, thanks to an adjustable liquid pump [60][61][62].At the end of dry deposition sampling, all of the water was transferred into a clean plastic bottle with a plastic stopper, carried to the laboratory, and analyzed.
Collecting settled airborne particles using polyethylene sheets and boxes (1-1.5 m 2 ) as samplers and a clean brush can be useful [36].The sample bags were sealed in the field with plastic clips, double bagged in zip-sealed bags, and placed in nylon stuff sacks to limit abrasion during transport from the collection sites.All the samples were divided into two size fractions: >30 mm (coarse particle) and <30 mm (fine particle) using a copper sieve, pressed in order to obtain a tablet, and finally an elemental analysis was performed using wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.

Mercury.
Mercury is released in to the atmosphere through both natural and anthropogenic activities [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71] in three main forms: elemental vapour Hg(0), gaseous divalent Hg(II), and particulate phase mercury Hg(p).Temporal and spatial scales of mercury transport in the atmosphere and its transfer to aquatic and terrestrial receptors depend primarily on the chemical and physical interactions with atmospheric contaminants [72].Atmospheric deposition is widely recognized as the primary mechanism by which Hg enters terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, where it can be converted to the organic, bioaccumulative form: methylmercury (MeHg) which resides in the soils for long periods [19,[73][74][75][76].It has been widely accepted that mercury is never removed from the environment; it just moves to other locations and eventually ends up in soils and sediments [77][78][79].Adequate techniques for sampling and analysis of mercury in precipitation have grown considerably during the last decade.Sampling of atmospheric depositions of mercury is carried out with several collectors described in Table 4.The materials used (funnels and bottles of collection) according to European directive 2008/50/CE [80] should be made of borosilicate glass, PTFE, or PFA and are "wet-only" or "bulk" type samplers.
There are samplers that have two containers for collecting wet and dry deposition, respectively, with one barrelhead (dust preventing cover) that can switch between the two containers automatically depending on the weather conditions [81].During a precipitation event (rain or snow), the barrelhead switches to the dry deposition container, thereby exposing the wet container to precipitation, and vice versa.In this case, wet precipitations are stored in a high density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic bag, whereas the snow samples during the cold seasons were melted at room temperature.Figure 2 shows a scheme of "bulk" sampler.Several institutes belonging to monitoring networks throughout Europe and North America have provided sampling and analysis procedures [82].The bulk samplers based on the IVL/Sweden design are composed of a borosilicate glass funnel (diameter 8.2 cm, area 52.8 cm 2 ) with glass filter and capillary tube (diameter 4 mm, length 0.5 cm), while the WDNR sampler modified IVL/USA has a heating system to prevent freezing in winter, glass funnel (diameter 9.7 cm), and glass bottle (500 mL).Finally, GKSS/Germany model sampler has a Teflon funnel (diameter 35 cm) and brownglass bottles.On the contrary, the wet-only samplers are made of quartz glass funnel (diameter 25 cm, area 490 cm 2 ), Teflon tube (length 25 cm), and Teflon bottles (1 L), and the NSA 181 KD/Germany sampler also has a thermostatic system for samples maintained at 4 ∘ C. Furthermore the ARS 721/Germany samplers have a borosilicate glass funnel (diameter 25.6 cm, area 500 cm 2 ), PFA bottle (2 L), and heating system to prevent the formation of ice.The MDN sampler modified Aerochem Metric Sampler/USA-NADP is equipped with double system for Hg (glass funnel, glass capillary, and bottle) and trace metals (PE or Teflon funnel and PE or Teflon bottle).Furthermore, wet-only samplers have the advantage of avoiding particle dry deposition, although the contribution of gaseous or particulate mercury species to the wet deposition fluxes in nonindustrialized or nonurban areas is probably not large.Both samplers can be designed for sampling during all seasons and all climatic conditions.However, the sampling times range from 1 week to 1 month and the samples are monthly preserved with HCl (5 mL/L) prior to sampling.Relevant instruments for the analysis of mercury are the AFS and the AAS; the latter requires larger sample volumes due to the lower detection limit.All the material required for a sample must be handled carefully during transit and manipulation of the samples, to avoid contamination.Samples should be stabilized immediately after sampling and analysis must be carried out within 6  months.Determination of total Hg involves the following steps (see Table 5): Hg, present in its various forms, is oxidized to Hg 2+ by Bromine monochloride (BrCl); so all the Hg 2+ is reduced to Hg(0) using tin chloride (SnCl 2 ).Hg vapors, using the purge and trap technique, are concentrated on a gold trap; by thermal desorption, Hg passes into a second trap from which, after a new thermal desorption, it is sent into the measuring cell, where it is detected by CVAFS [83].
In ambient air the particulate fraction of mercury is usually <5% [84], but this increases the risk of gas to particulate conversions during sampling.Therefore, CVAFS technique [85,86] is used to analyze the Hg(p) which is collected on quartz fiber disc held in a miniaturized device [87].This device combines the inherent advantages of the quartz fiber filter and the quartz wool plug technologies and serves as both particulate trap (during sampling) and pyrolyzer (during analysis) for airborne particulate-phase mercury species [88,89].A new analytical method was developed for direct analysis of Hg(p) by a graphite plate collection technique coupled with ETAAS [90] using the plate for atomization in PdCl 2 -coated pyrolytic graphite tube with chemical modifier consisting of a 5% (NH 4 ) 2 S solution, which increases the collection efficiency of particle-bound mercury to 99%.Compared to traditional techniques [91], the proposed method is a better time-resolved procedure with the higher accuracy (±8%) [92].

Biodeposition.
Biomonitoring is regarded, in a general sense, as a means to assess trace element concentrations in aerosols and deposition.This implies that the monitor should concentrate the element of interest and quantitatively reflect its ambient conditions [93].In addition, environmental impact on the biomonitor's behaviour is viewed as resulting in changes in the dose-response relationships [94].
With proper selection of organisms, the general advantage of the biomonitoring approach is related primarily to the permanent and common occurrence of the organism in the field, even in remote areas, the ease of sampling, and the absence of any necessary expensive technical equipment; moreover, it allows long-term monitoring with a large number of sampling sites and also the simultaneous determination of several pollutants within the same matrix [95].
Of all biological species used in biomonitoring, lichens and mosses are the most used in the literature as lack of any roots in comparison with higher plants allows mineral supplies from aerial sources and not from the substratum, so they are strongly dependent for their mineral nutrients on wet and dry deposition on the plant surface (of either nutrients or pollutants) [96][97][98].The morphology of lichens and mosses does not vary with seasons; thus, accumulation can occur throughout the year.Lichens and mosses usually have considerable longevity, which led to their use as longterm integrators of atmospheric deposition [99][100][101].Natural variabilities in ambient macro-and microclimate conditions, such as acidity, temperature, humidity, light, altitude, or ambient elemental (nutritional) occurrences, may cause the biomonitor to exhibit variable behaviour.Part of this variance is shown as local variance, but this behaviour becomes a problem when it seriously affects the biomonitor in its accumulative responses [94].Different strategies might be followed when lichens are used in biomonitoring studies: the use of in situ lichens (observation or chemical analysis of indigenous plants) and the use of lichen transplants (collection of biomonitors from a nonpolluted site and transplantation to sites to be monitored).Both can give information about spatial and temporal effects of pollutants deposition.Because lichen growth is very slow, the sampling of in situ lichens gives information about air pollution long-term effects.However, sometimes there is a need to study the patterns of the pollutants deposition throughout time, particularly with climate variables.In this case, lichen transplants should be used to provide information about air pollution short-term effects [102].Table 6 shows the main features of the different strategies of lichens biomonitoring.In general, the passive biomonitoring method has one major disadvantage: all processes and all sources act at the same time and there is no possibility of separating them and looking for a particular one [103].This method has been widely used to monitor metal pollution in terrestrial and aquatic environments [104].The spatial impact integrated over time was evaluated from the concentrations of Ca, Fe, and Mg in in situ Xanthoria parietina.While, for temporal sampling, the fruticose lichen Ramalina canariensis Steiner was chosen because it is relatively easy to collect, clean, and transplant, its fruticose growth form facilitates particle interception and tolerates some sea influence [105].After being cleaned from debris, each sample was dried for 24 h at 80 ∘ C and weighed.An acid digestion was then made with HNO 3 at 200 ∘ C. The total concentration of Ca, Fe, Mg, and K was determined by AAS using an air/acetylene flame, with CsCl and LaCl 3 added to samples and standards, as suppressants of ionization and refractory compound formation, respectively.For N and S concentrations, different thalli from each sampling point were dried for 24 h at 30 ∘ C and then homogenized in a mill; replicates were separated and the total concentrations determined by elemental analysis (CHNS/O Analyser).More recently, lichens have been used to monitor PCDDs/Fs and PAHs [106][107][108][109].The lichen species selected for biomonitoring of PCDDs/Fs atmospheric deposition was Xanthoria parietina growing on house roof tiles [110].Lichen species R. canariensis Steiner (epiphytic, fruticose, and bushy-like structured lichen) were collected mainly from Pinus pinea Aiton, on a minimum of five to ten trees at each sampling point, and always at a 1-3 m height.At each sampling site, collection of lichens was restricted to a square area not larger than 50 × 50 m and not smaller than 10 × 10 m.Lichen sampling was performed after a dry period of about 70-80 days (precipitation below 7 mm) and during a meteorologically stable period [111].For lichen analyses of PAHs, approximately each sample was extracted in a Soxhlet with acetonitrile for 24 h.After extraction, all extracts were concentrated by rotary vacuum evaporation and cleaned up in a florisil column with acetonitrile as eluting solvent.Subsequently, the extracts were again evaporated and concentrated with a gentle stream of purified N 2 .The samples were analyzed by HPLC, coupled to both ultraviolet/visible and ultraviolet fluorescence detector [112].Also the measurement of dioxins was performed using ground and dried lichen samples, extracted using Soxhlet method (toluene), cleanup on mixed silica column, aluminum oxide column, and gelchromatography (Bio-Beads S-X3A) method, and quantified with HRGC/HRMS.Pine needles from P. pinea are classified as a good biomonitor of toxic organic compounds including PAHs.Samples were collected from the terminal part of branches, always at the same position on the tree, packed in brown glass bottles, protected from sunlight, and immediately stored at 4 ∘ C. All samples were extracted and analyzed for the 16 EPA-PAHs within two months [112].Tillandsia usneoides, from Bromeliaceae, is an epiphyte that captures all its nutrients from the atmosphere and concomitantly accumulates heavy metals.Its morphology, with millimetric dimensions of the leaves and no roots, makes it ideal for handling and preparation of transplanting systems, and due to its high relation between surface area and mass, it has a high efficiency, for example, in Hg accumulation.Systems were hung at 2-20 m height in open areas, close to and in the surroundings of the gold shops as well as in control areas.Mineralisation of the plants is carried out for Hg analysis and determination of Hg was done by cold vapour atomic absorption spectrophotometry [113].As shown in Table 14, the most commonly used techniques to obtain the elemental concentration of heavy metals are AAS, AFS, AMA, CVAAS, CVAFS, ETAAS, FAAS, GFAAS, ICP-ES, ICP-MS, and ICP-OES XRF [114][115][116].

An Overview of Findings from
Scientific Literature  [36,[117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124].The annual average dust deposition fluxes in China (Table 7) ranks among the first observed throughout the world, with values ranging from 0.05 (remote location) to 450 g m −2 y −1 (desert).The deposition fluxes in the Chinese cities are generally high due to a great number of sources impacting on air quality: presence of coal-burning power plant, sand transport from deserts, drought climate, and heavy traffic.In addition, several studies aimed to evaluate site-specificity, seasonality, and daily variability of settleable particle concentrations.In particular, Wu et al. [125] measured dry deposition flux at Taichung Harbor (Taiwan) and they found levels (g m −2 sec −1 ) 15 times lower than those determined at urban site in Taiwan (86 g m −2 sec −1 ) by Fang et al. [55].Moreover, dry deposition flux at harbor site was 3 times higher in winter than in summer.The same findings were obtained by Soriano et al. for industrial site in Spain [38].Probably the high dry deposition fluxes in winter were due to the lower dispersive capacity of atmosphere in that season that determines an accumulation of pollutants emitted into the air because of transport phenomena and of diffusion of pollutants that occur too slowly [126].On the contrary, the same authors observed opposite features at costal site where highest dry deposition levels were determined in summer, when the ambient dryness and low precipitation increase the atmospheric dust content.In this season in fact, erosion and transport of common soil minerals by means of wind and African dust episodes are highly probable in the Mediterranean area [127].On a daily scale, Fang et al. and Yun et al. found that the average dry deposition fluxes measured for the daytime period were higher than those determined for nighttime period [56].Moreover, these values strongly correlate with wind speed because, beyond traffic vehicles, wind speed variation between daytime and nighttime period plays an important role in influencing the dry deposition fluxes.
The size distribution of settleable particles has been also evaluated in some papers.Cao et al. showed on average about 10% of the settled dusts having size <2 m, about 80% having size between 2 and 50 m, and <10% having size >50 m [36].Despite the concentrations in small particles being high, the dry deposition fluxes are mainly determined by larger particles because of their higher dry deposition velocity.
Finally, it is important to consider that several studies estimate the deposition flux of particle using a multistep model that it takes into account the ambient concentrations and deposition velocities.Despite the approximations used, the estimated fluxes result in good agreement with those measured [42,53,57,125,[128][129][130].

Organics.
It was demonstrated that wet and dry deposition events are the major processes that remove POPs from the atmosphere causing soil contamination.Hence, there is a need for monitoring the atmospheric deposition of POPs for early recognition of trends and early development of environmental action plans.Researches on atmospheric deposition of POPs, such as PAHs, PCDDs/Fs, and PCBs, have been carried out widely in different parts of the world in order to determine their deposition fluxes, investigating its spatial and seasonal variations, and assess the influence of emission sources, local population distribution, and atmospheric concentrations [21,32,131,132].

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.
The comparison among different collector types, sampling workup procedures, and analysis methods showed that the highest deposition rates of PAHs and low measurement uncertainty were obtained with a funnel-bottle collector [24,133].The deposition rates obtained with the wet-only collectors were the lowest at industrial sites and under dry weather conditions.For the open-jar collectors, the measurement uncertainty was high [133].Several monitoring campaigns were conducted in different types of sampling sites and in different seasons in order to measure PAHs deposition fluxes and to study the effect of the Meteoclimatic parameters on monitored levels (see Table 8).Wang et al. in 2011 detected the bulk deposition of 15 PAHs in remote, rural village, and urban areas of Beijing Tianjin region, North China, in spring, summer, fall, and winter [32].The annually averaged PAHs concentration and deposition fluxes were 11.81 ± 4.61 g/g and 5.2 ± 3.89 g/m 2 /day, respectively.These values were comparable to those reported previously in North China, where deposition fluxes of 15 PAHs were 4.88 g/m 2 /day in Tianjin and 5.14 g/m 2 /day in rural area of Beijing [125,131].Moreover, PAHs flux depositions were similar to those monitored in Seoul (5.5 g/m 2 /day and 12 g/m 2 /day in spring and winter [134]), in Tampa Bay, USA, (6.8 g/m 2 /day [135]), in Izmit Bay, Turkey (8.3 g/m 2 /day [31]), and in Manchester and Cardiff (UK) (5.2 g/m 2 /day and 4.1 g/m 2 /day, resp., [136]).However, the values were significantly higher than that in rural area of Southern Germany (0.55 g/m 2 /day [28]), in Eastern Mediterranean (0.46 g/m 2 /day [137]), in rural area of France during heating time period (0.13 g/m 2 /day [138]), in urban area of western Greece (0.19 g/m 2 /day [139]), in southern Ontario, Canada (0.07 g/m 2 /day [140]), and in New England coast (0.22 g/m 2 /day [141]).The deposition profile was dominated by fluorene (17-28%), phenanthrene (22-35%), pyrene (12%), and chrysene (9-11%) [ 15,21,22,27,32].Moving from wet season (from April to September) to dry season (from October to March), the deposition profile shows a significant increase in the contribution of the lighter compounds, while the atmospheric profile remains essentially unchanged [27,28,31].The deposition fluxes of particle-bound PAHs were not correlated with particulate PAHs in air, but positively correlated with rainfall during the wet season (daily precipitation more than 8.4 mm/day).On the contrary, in dry season, with precipitation less than 3.0 mm/day, the deposition fluxes were well correlated with the atmospheric concentration of the particulate PAHs ( 2 = 0.62,  < 0.1) but not correlated with rainfall.This finding should be linked to the different distribution patterns of PAHs profile among the particle size fractions in wet and dry seasons; the different size particles have the different precipitation scavenging ratios and deposition velocities [27].Impact of the ambient temperature on the deposition fluxes was shown by the significant correlations between the deposition fluxes and temperature for PAHs with higher concentrations in winter and lower values in summer [142].Pekey et al. [31] verified that, while the wet deposition fluxes of 3-ringed PAHs were higher in cold period than in the warm period, the fluxes of 4-or 6-ringed PAHs did not show any significant variation.However, the contributions of 5-ringed PAHs to the total deposition fluxes were very high in warm period when compared with the contributions of 3-and 4-ringed PAH compounds.The spatial distribution of PAHs deposition flux was also assessed in several studies [21,32,142].The monitoring campaign of PAHs in bulk deposition samples conducted by Wang et al. [32], in different areas of Beijing Tianjin region, North China, allowed examining the spatial distribution and emission sources in remote, rural, and urban areas.The obtained results showed that PAHs bulk deposition flux in rural villages (3.91 g/m 2 /day) and urban areas (8.28 g/m 2 /day) was 3.8 and 9.1 times higher than that in background area (0.82 g/m 2 /day), respectively.This spatial variation of deposition fluxes of PAHs was related to the PAHs emission sources, local population density, and air concentration of PAHs [32].The different emission sources were qualitatively identified on the basis of PAHs composition profiles represented by diagnostic ratios, according to Motelay-Massei et al. [33].The FLA/PYR ratio allowed separating the pyrolytic and petrogenic PAH sources: FLA/PYR ratio higher than 1 is a characteristic of a pyrolytic origin, whereas values lower than 1 are typical of a petrogenic origin, such as coal combustion in Europe and North America [33].This ratio can provide some specific information about the PAHs origin and the change in PAHs sources during the year.Values of IcdP/IcdP + BghiP and FLA/(FLA + PYR) allowed us to confirm PAHs sources: an FLA/(PYR + FLA) ratio < 0.4 implies petroleum, 0.4-0.5 implies petroleum combustion (liquid fossil fuel and vehicle and crude oil), and >0.5 implies combustion of coal, grass, and wood [33].The judgment rule for IcdP/(IcdP + BghiP) is the same with that for FLA/(PYR + FLA).Most samples collected in Beijing Tianjin region had ratios >0.5, indicating a predominant influence of coal/biofuel combustion.In addition, a significant difference for these ratios between winter and the other three seasons was observed confirming the coal and biomass (straw, firewood) combustion as the prevalent source in winter (the wintertime consumption of these fuels was 1.5-2 times higher than in summer due to residential heating).Cavalcante et al. [21] studied the influence of urban activities on the depositional fluxes of PAHs in bulk precipitation collected in the Fortaleza metropolitan area, Ceará, Brazil.The highest concentrations and depositional fluxes of PAHs were detected in a zone with heavy automobile traffic and favorable topography for the concentration of emitted pollutants.Diagnostic ratio analyses of PAH samples showed that the major source of emissions is gasoline exhaust, with a small percentage originating from diesel fuel.Contributions from coal and wood combustion were also found [21].
The study conducted by Li et al. [142] in 15 sites in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) from December 2003 to November 2004 showed higher spatial variations in the center of the PRD than at the coastal sites for all PAHs.Levels were higher in the center and lower in the edge of the PRD, confirming that PAHs in the PRD region were predominantly originated from vehicle emission and coal combustion.PAHs twoyear monitoring campaign conducted in three rural regions of Southern Germany using passive deposition samplers showed that spatial variability due to topography was negligible and differences between open-field and forest deposition were within a factor of 2. Based on correlations with ambient temperature, advection was identified as the most important factor that controls the atmospheric deposition of PAHs.Gas adsorption significantly contributes to the deposition of the semivolatile compounds in forests, but particle deposition seems to be the major pathway for all PAHs [28].

Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans.
PCDDs/Fs were measured in bulk deposition at three Danish rural forest sites with a mutual maximum distance of 450 km [30].Mean bulk deposition fluxes were 1 ng m −2 y −1 I-TEQ and deviated less than 30% among the sites; there was a relatively small geographical variation in PCDDs/Fs bulk deposition over Denmark and at the neighboring stations in Northern Germany.Similar congener patterns, but lower bulk deposition fluxes, were found in a semirural area in Lake Maggiore in Northern Italy (140 pg TEQ m −2 d −1 ) and a suburban area near the Adriatic sea (Rimini, Italy) (0.75-3.73 pg TEQ m −2 d −1 ) [25,143].This finding confirms a long-range atmospheric transport of PCDDs/Fs in areas characterized by low level contamination.Bulk deposition of PCDDs/Fs collected in Danish rural forest sites also showed a moderate seasonal variation with mean winter fluxes that were twice the fluxes during summertime.In particular, it was found that the winter/summer ratios of deposition values for 17 congeners were centered on a mean value of 2.1 pg TEQ m −2 d −1 with no systematic differences between the congeners [30].Time series of PCDDs/Fs depositions in a large conurbation in northwestern Germany were analyzed by Bruckmann et al. [144].Data analysis highlighted a decreasing trend of PCDDs/Fs depositions within the last 2 decades (about a factor of 5) at the urban background sites.At the sites in the near surroundings of the industrial sources, the decrease was even more pronounced (about one order of magnitude).The decrease of depositions at the remote site was smaller, as important local sources were lacking and the levels were dominated by long-range transport.Depositions have reached background levels since about 2005 (5-10 pg TEQ m −2 d −1 in remote site) and there was no further decrease [144].Fang et al. [29] used resin deposition samplers to monitor PCDDs/Fs deposition at four sites around steel complexes in Pohang, South Korea.The bulk deposition within the steelwork complexes showed the highest Σ4-8 PCDDs/Fs (tetra-octa) fluxes, ranging from 204 to 608 pg m −2 d −1 , confirming steelwork complexes as major sources of PCDDs/Fs.The deposition around the steelwork complexes was characteristic of high amount of lower chlorinated PCDDs.Apparent seasonal variations of the bulk deposition at each site and seasonal homologue patterns of PCDDs/Fs were observed, probably resulting from temperature-dependent gas/particle partitioning [29].

Polychlorinated Biphenyls.
Several studies conducted in industrial, urban, and rural areas showed that particle phase depositions dominated the dry deposition processes for the removal of PCBs from the atmosphere, and the atmospheric deposition fluxes in the cold season were higher than those detected during the warm season [143,[145][146][147]. Average dry deposition fluxes of total PCBs in industrial, urban, and rural areas of southern Taiwan ranged from 289 to 1010 pg m −2 d −1 (0.540-1.94 pg WHO-TEQ m −2 d −1 ) [147].These values were higher than those measured in Turkey near an industrial site, where average particulate Σ41-PCBs dry deposition fluxes were 349 ± 183 and 469 ± 328 ng m −2 d −1 in summer and winter [146] and, at a suburban site, where PCBs flux ranged from 2 to 160 ng m −2 d −1 [148].Mi et al. in 2012 [147] verified that the dry deposition velocity of individual PCBs (0.069-3.38 cm/s) increased as the number of chlorinated substitutes increased.This evidence is due to the fact that low chlorinated PCBs are predominant in gas phase and have lower deposition velocities.

Metals.
Besides environmental consequences, particulate matter was linked to health damage as it contains a wide range of toxic metals and organic contaminants.Some metals like Cu and Zn are essential nutrients but they can cause harmful effects depending on their concentration levels.Cd is considered very toxic, classified as potential carcinogenic [149].Pb is also recognized by the World Health Organization as one of the most dangerous chemical elements for the human health [150,151].In order to describe these issues a lot of scientific work was carried out.Fang et al. [55] measured downward and upward dry deposition fluxes of particulate heavy metals (Fe, Pb, Zn, Cu, Mg, and Mn) in daytime period (from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.) and nighttime period (from 6:30 p.m. to 6:30 a.m.) in a traffic sampling site in Sha-Lu, a small city in the central Taiwan.The average downward and upward dry deposition fluxes found in the daytime period (54.1 and 26.5 g/m 2 s, resp.) were all higher than average downward and upward dry deposition fluxes found in the nighttime period (26.2 and 12.1 g/m 2 s, resp.).This fact is probably due to the vehicular traffic and wind speed variation between daytime and nighttime period.In addition, the average downward dry deposition fluxes are greater than the upward dry deposition fluxes for all the heavy metals in either daytime or nighttime period, and the proposed reasons are that the wind speed and concentration difference between daytime and nighttime period lead to these results.Daytime and nighttime dry deposition fluxes of particulate heavy metals were measured also in Kunpo, a small city in the Seoul metropolitan area in Korea.Also in this site, the fluxes of nighttime were lower than daytime in all periods due to the lower wind speeds during the nighttime (the average wind speed of 1.47 m s −1 in nighttime versus 2.23 m s −1 in daytime) and the lower atmospheric concentrations than daytime.The average fluxes of Al and Ca, typical crustal species, were 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than Mn and anthropogenic elements such as As, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn.
Fang et al. [56] studied the dry deposition fluxes of metallic elements at Taichung Airport in central Taiwan in relationship with the size of particulate matter.At this site, the average downward dry deposition fluxes of metallic elements (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Pb, Cr, and Mg) were 218.0, 109.0,194.3, 21.9, 56.0, 11.2, and 105.7 g m −2 d −1 , respectively.The most of these fluxes are due to particles larger than 2.5 m in size due to their high deposition velocities.The results also indicate that the best approach to estimate overall dry deposition is by using either coarse particle or total particle concentrations.The same authors [57] also investigated seasonal concentrations of metallic elements Mn, Zn, Cr, Cu, and Pb in dry deposit particulates at five characteristic sampling sites in central Taiwan.Average seasonal concentrations of Mn, Zn, Cr, Cu, and Pb in dry deposits were the highest in fall and winter and lowest in summer at all five sampling sites.In addition, the average concentrations of dry deposited Mn, Zn, Cr, Cu, and Pb were the highest at Quan-Xing, an industrial site, in which many industrial processes take place.Also Soriano et al. in 2012 [38] performed a study of heavy metal concentrations in the settleable particulate matter in two locations (Almazora and Vila-real) which were positioned within the ceramic cluster of Castellón (Spain) and had high industrial density.The results related to the heavy metal concentrations over the observation period show a high seasonal variability for heavy metal content in settleable particulate and a strong dependence on the rainfall in the study area.The maximum values of heavy metals were obtained in spring or autumn coinciding with the highest rainfall, while the lowest values were generally obtained during periods of low rainfall (summer).This fact was associated with the scavenging ability of the rain in removing pollutants from the atmosphere.In the atmosphere, the gases are absorbed and the particulate matter is trapped in raindrops falling on the ground [152].In falling, the drops of rain (much larger than drops of water) drag solid particles in their path (dust or contaminants).Other authors have made the same observation.Melaku et al. [153] found a clear decrease in the concentrations of heavy metals in the samples collected in Washington, DC (precipitation samples and ambient air samples), during periods of high rainfall.These data provide strong evidence that rain affects the concentrations of heavy metals in any type of sample [153].The importance of dependence of deposition of heavy metals from climatic characteristics was discussed also by Muezzinoglu and Cizmecioglu [59].In this study, deposition samples were collected and analyzed for selected heavy metals in Izmir, Turkey.The average total heavy metal concentrations for Cr, Cd, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Ni were generally higher than the values previously measured at different sites around the world [154][155][156][157][158]. In particular, the dry deposition for Izmir was 10-50 times higher for Cd, 4-20 times higher for Pb, and 5-30 times higher for Zn than in Tokyo, Japan [154].Although the sampling methods may differ, statistical analysis showed that the sticky deposition plate and water surface sampler methods give the same dry deposition results [58,154].
Sakata et al. [17] measured wet and dry deposition fluxes of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, and V in the Tokyo Bay area, which is highly affected by anthropogenic sources.The order of the average ratios of dry/wet deposition fluxes at three sites was Cr, 6.9 > As, 5.9 > Mn, 4.7 > V, 4.5 > Cu, 4.4 > Ni, 3.7 > Cd, 2.9 > Pb, 2.0 > Hg, 1.0.Thus, the atmospheric deposition of the trace elements except Hg in Tokyo Bay is predominantly dry deposition.For such trace elements, the wet and dry deposition fluxes within the bay were higher than those inland.The mean deposition fluxes (wet + dry) of the trace elements in the Tokyo Bay area can be compared with those estimated, or directly measured, in other aquatic regions [74,141,[159][160][161][162][163][164].The fluxes of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and V in the Tokyo Bay area were similar to those in the Seine Estuary [159] or the Pearl River Delta [160], where highly industrialized regions are present.However, the Tokyo Bay area had much higher atmospheric deposition fluxes of trace elements than other aquatic regions in the US and Europe [74,141,[161][162][163][164], as shown in Table 9.
Sabin et al. [53] analyzed the role of major roadways, such as a freeway, as a significant source of localized metal deposition to urban surfaces and the role of resuspension in the net deposition and dispersion of particulate matter near roadways.In particular, the authors characterized dry deposition patterns of Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, and Zn upwind and at increasing distances downwind of the freeway in coastal Los Angeles.The dry deposition fluxes of metals were higher at short distances from the freeway and quickly reduced to urban background fluxes within 150 m, especially for Cu, Pb, and Zn.These results were similar to the observations of Zhu et al. [165] for ultrafine particle concentrations ( < 0.1 mm) measured downwind of the same freeway in which high concentrations near the freeway reduced to urban background within 300 m.The fluxes of Cu, Pb, and Zn were significantly higher close to the freeway suggesting that the freeway acts as a significant source of these metals especially concentrated on larger particles, which are expected to deposit close to their source.The freeway likely represents a source of large particles containing Cu, Pb, and Zn because of resuspension of road dust, as vehicles travel on the freeway at high velocities [166,167], and from tire and brake wear from vehicles [168][169][170].

Ions. The chemical characterization of wet and dry
depositions plays an important role in sources identification.In particular, ions determination in wet and dry depositions is essential for understanding regional variations, local influences by anthropogenic or natural sources, and long-range  transport phenomena of air pollutants.Among the ions, more attention is paid to the atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulfur species because of drawbacks that they could lead to for the ecosystems such as acidification and accumulation of excess nutrients [171].The deposition flux of nitrate in rural and suburban region is controlled by the imported NO  from motor vehicles, the deposition of sulphate by power plants and factories [172], and deposition of ammonium mainly originated from the ammonia volatilization loss from N-fertilization in agricultural fields and animal production [173].Tsitouridou and Anatolaki [39] also found high sulphate (27 meq m −2 y −1 ) and calcium (31 meq m −2 y −1 ) content in wet and dry deposition samples at two sites in northwestern Greece (Figure 3), where four coal-burning power plants were present, highlighting the strong influence of fly ash and SO 2 emissions as also described by other authors [174].
The dry and wet deposition fluxes for these species are well correlated with air pollutions, and their decreasing in the recent two decades in Europe and USA is substantially due to a more stringent legislation for the reduction of atmospheric concentrations of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides [175].Nevertheless, the sulphur and nitrogen deposition values in many areas still remain far from satisfactory and they substantially change among the different sampling sites [176].Rossini et al., for example, found deposition fluxes in industrial area, about three times higher (10.4,8.9, and 20.1 mg m −2 d −1 for sulphate, ammonium, and nitrate, in average, resp.)than in urban site (5.9, 2.3, and 8.9 mg m −2 d −1 in average, resp.) in Venetian lagoon (Italy) and yearly deposition fluxes at least twice higher than those determined at coastal (Castelporziano and Pula) and remote (Tessa) sites in Italy [177].Qi et al. in 2013 [178] also reported an overview of nitrogen dry deposition fluxes over the oceans.In Yellow Sea [179,180] and the East China Sea [181] were determined similar values for the dry deposition fluxes.However, these values were higher than the values of coastal regions in Japan [182], US [183], the West Baltic Sea [184], and the Atlantic Ocean [185].In particular, the higher concentrations of inorganic nitrogen were most likely related to the fossil fuel combustion [186], animal waste [187], and large-scale utilization of nitrogenous fertilizers in China [188,189].In addition, the values of dry deposition flux of nitrate and ammonium over Yellow sea were similar to Singapore [137,190] but lower than that of inland China [191,192] due to high emission intensities of NH 3 , NO  , and SO 2 in inland regions.Moreover, several papers highlighted also the differences in dry and wet contribution to the total depositions relating to different site typologies.Tsitouridou and Anatolaki [39] observed that the contribution of dry deposition to the total (wet + dry) at urban site and for the site closed the power plant in Greece is higher (60-70%) than wet deposition for ions, while an opposite pattern characterized by higher contribution for wet than dry deposition was observed for the remote site.These findings suggest that dry deposition of sulphate, nitrate, and ammonium, which are due to gaseous species deposition for 70-90%, are generally more connected with local emissions with respect to wet deposition which better reflects transport phenomena and other gas-particle reaction formations.Anyway, the wet contribution to total deposition of ions increases also at local levels when high rainfall was observed.In fact, the monthly variation of the wet deposition is mainly related to rainfall, showing the significance of the precipitation effect on the prevailing scavenging mechanism on the ions [176,178].

Mercury.
Mercury emissions from natural processes (primary mercury + reemissions), including mercury depletion events, were estimated to be 5,207 Mg y −1 which represent more than 70% of the global mercury emission budget (GEb) (see Table 10).Oceans were the most important sources followed by biomass burning, desert, metalliferous and nonvegetated zones, tundra, and grassland.Anthropogenic source, which includes a large number of industrial point sources, was estimated to account for 2,320 Mg of mercury emissions annually.The majority of mercury emissions originate from combustion of fossil fuel, followed by artisanal small scale gold mining, nonferrous metal production, cement production, caustic soda production, waste disposal, pig iron production, and other processes [193].However, the anthropogenic Hg emissions in Europe were still higher (341.8t y −1 in 1995) than the natural emissions, estimated to be about 250-300 t y −1 , although a decrease of 45% results in comparison with the emissions registered in 1990.Coal combustion has been the major source of anthropogenic emissions contributing to more than half of the total anthropogenic emissions [194].As in most of the industrialized areas, the anthropogenic emission of Hg represents a particular concern; atmospheric deposition of Hg is gaining importance in the scientific community in evaluating the biogeochemical fate of this metal.
Ann Chalmers et al. [195] described reliability and collection efficiency of a newly designed wet-deposition sampler (Figure 4) and presented THg and MeHg wet-deposition data and analysis from four sites around the Boston area.Wet-deposition samples were collected from January 2002 to August 2004 and analyzed for THg, and a subset of samples from September 2003 to August 2004 was analyzed for MeHg.Concentrations of THg in precipitation ranged from 0.73 to 24.6 ng L −1 at the four sites, whereas MeHg concentrations at all sites were below the detection level of 0.04 ng L −1 .The Manchester site, in the most urban environment, had the highest precipitation-weighted THg concentration (8.31 ng L −1 ), and Blue Hill, the closest site to Boston, had the highest deposition rate (9.98 g m −2 y −1 ).The regional background site, in Laconia, NH, had the lowest precipitation-weighted THg concentration (6.87 ng L −1 ) and the lowest deposition rate (6.56 g m −2 y −1 ).Finally, they found that the average annual Hg wet-deposition rate in metropolitan Boston (Manchester, Beverly, and Blue Hill) was 9.16 g m −2 y −1 , 28 percent higher than the Hg deposition rate at the regional background site.
Fulkerson et al. [196] attested that the total flux of Hg to the earth's surface involves both wet and dry processes.However, direct measurements of dry deposition are technically difficult to make and have very large uncertainties [197][198][199][200]. Consequently, inferential methods have been used to estimate dry deposition, but these methods require knowledge of ambient concentrations of each species of Hg in the atmosphere.
The importance of wet scavenging of mercury has been demonstrated by Huang et al. [81], studying the wet deposition of mercury at a remote site in the Tibetan Plateau, collecting deposition samples (both rain and snow) over a 2-year period from July 2009 to 2011, and showing concentrations of mercury from 3.8 to 5.3 ng L −1 during the monsoon season and from 6.9 to 8.2 ng L −1 during the non-monsoon season.Monsoon season (June through September) is typically the rainy season in the Tibetan Plateau; approximately 90.6% of the annual total precipitation fell in the monsoon season.As a consequence of the strong seasonality of precipitation at study site, total mercury wet deposition fluxes were also seasonal with 83% of the wet deposition fluxes occurring during the monsoon season.Further works have been carried out on the atmospheric mercury deposition, and many of these ones were treated in a review of studies of 2012 [201] in which the current understanding on atmospheric Hg emissions, distribution, and transport in China was reported.The magnitude of Hg emissions to the atmosphere from Chinese anthropogenic sources has been estimated to be in the range 500-700 t y −1 , whereby comprising a significant proportion of the globe total anthropogenic emissions.According to the studies by Pirrone et al. and Wu et al. [193,202], coal combustion in China released approximately 256-268 t of Hg to the atmosphere in 2003, accounting for about 40% of the total anthropogenic emissions in that country.Furthermore, Hg(p) concentrations in Chinese urban air are generally significantly high, where the observations fell in a range from 109 to 1180 pg m −3 .
Rose et al. [203] studied the MeHg concentrations by bulk deposition during winter in a remote Scottish mountain lake, Lochnagar, covering a 7-year period from 2001 to 2008 and showing an unusual seasonal pattern as elevated MeHg concentrations occur each winter while concentrations fall below the limit of detection each summer.Concentrations above detection limit occurred each year between autumn and spring; summer deposition concentrations were lower and usually below detection limit.In particular, peak concentrations occurred in the first few months of each year (late February to early April) and ranged between 0.27 ng L −1 (April 2004 and 2005) and 0.88 ng L −1 (March 2006).In addition, in October 2006 and October 2007, peaks were also recorded reaching 1.2 ng L −1 and 0.31 ng L −1 , respectively.Finally, the authors concluded that the observed winter inputs of MeHg to the Lochnagar catchment may therefore represent a significant input to the loch of this biologically important pollutant, especially during snowmelt when winter accumulation enters the loch in a short period of time.
Drevnick et al. [204] used lake sediments to derive estimates of net atmospheric Hg deposition to Svalbard, Norwegian Arctic.Sedimentary Hg accumulation in these lakes is a linear function of the ratio of catchment area to lake area, and they used this relationship to model net atmospheric Hg flux using a DMA-80 Direct Mercury Analyzer; preindustrial and modern estimates are 2.5 ± 3.3 mg m −2 y −1 and 7.0 ± 3.0 mg m −2 y −1 , respectively.Hg concentrations and accumulation rates in lake sediments increase from relatively low values in preindustrial sediments to peak values in recent sediments.Concentrations increase up-core from 20-50 ng g −1 dry wt. to 60-90 ng g −1 dry wt.These results are consistent with other studies of lake sediments throughout the Arctic [205][206][207].In Tables 11 and 12 is reported a collection data of THg and MeHg deposition fluxes.
3.5.Biomonitors.The most commonly used organisms for air pollution and atmospheric deposition assessment, as biomonitors, are lichens, mosses, pine needles, and plants.Table 13 shows the most common biological species used in biomonitoring with main properties and references.Lichens were recognized as potential indicators of air pollution as early as the 1860s in Europe and elsewhere [100,208].Lichens were used to monitor metals, sulphur, nitrogen, fluoride, radionuclides, and a variety of organic compounds, such as dioxins and furans, PCBs, and substances originated from organochlorine pesticides [110-112, 209, 210].There are only a few studies using lichens as biomonitors of PAHs [109,211,212].The majority of these studies were conducted in natural and forested ecosystems or in urban environments [111,112].
In later works, averaged elemental contents of filtertrapped air particulate materials or deposition were compared with biomonitor's averaged metal concentrations: Andersen [213] reported parallelisms and linear relations in lichens, Sloof [99] and Jeran et al. [214] found positive correlations between metals in air particulates and transplanted lichens, and Berg and Steinnes [215] observed significant correlations between wet deposition and metal concentrations in mosses.
Goyal and Seaward [216] demonstrated possible metal uptake by lichen's rhizine, Prussia and Killingbeck [217] explained differences in lichen metal content associated with differences in substrata, and De Bruin and Hackenitz [218] found metal concentrations which did not differ between lichens and their bark substrata.
Concentrations of PCDDs/Fs in lichens tend to decrease after a wet deposition period.This decrease is the greatest for the highest molecular weight compounds (the most chlorinated PCDDs/Fs, such as octa-chloro-dibenzo-dioxin), meaning that these compounds are probably associated with the surface of lichens.This association may be mainly due to a slower diffusion rate of the highest molecular weight compounds through the lichen thallus; the slower rate will cause a higher concentration of these compounds at lichen surface and thus will make them more susceptible to mechanical wash-off.As POPs are not soluble in water, rain is not likely to act as vehicle to lead POPs from the surface to the bulk of lichens.Also, after a given volume of rain, the levels of PCDDs/Fs in lichens remain relatively constant, meaning that a fraction of POPs will be captured inside the lichen thallus or associated with insoluble particles trapped by the fungus and not accessible to further wash-off [107].PAH concentrations in lichens were compared with PAH concentrations measured in a conventional active sampler in an outdoor environment.Significant positive correlations between high molecular weight PAHs, sixteen EPA-PAHs, and BaP equivalent concentrations in lichens and those in air were found.Concentrations of sixteen EPA-PAHs in lichens and air showed a seasonal variation, with highest values during winter and lowest values during summer [94].
Blasco et al. [208] used lichens and found that the road traffic was the main source of PAHs in the Pyrenees Mountains region.These authors found that PAHs in lichens reflected the atmospheric particulates when they studied the PAH pollution caused by vehicle emissions in a tunnel but they did not make a calibration between lichens and air.When comparing lichens to soil and air, it was shown that profile of PAHs in lichens was substantially different from the one in soil but similar to air; it was also revealed that lichens intercept PAHs from both the vapor and particulatephases of air [112].More recently, using spatial models of PAHs accumulated in lichens, it was possible to fingerprint multiple sources of atmospheric PAHs in a regional area.Lichens seem to be an excellent candidate for biomonitoring PAHs in the atmosphere [94].
PCDDs/Fs profiles in R. canariensis were more similar to the ones found for air samples rather than the ones found for soil, showing that they are not reflecting soil particle resuspension or soil vaporization.Compared to other biomonitors (pine needles, fruits, and vegetables), lichens have appeared to accumulate greater concentrations of PCDDs/Fs, meaning that they may provide useful data, especially in areas where levels are below the detection limit for other monitors [111].
Lichens monitoring allowed the integration of PCDDs/Fs atmospheric deposition for much longer periods, allowing relating low levels with long-term chronic effects on health.Thus, the production of high-resolution data on environmental exposure essential to perform reliable environmental health studies was possible.It was argued that PCDDs/Fs in lichens may be used as spatial estimators of the potential risk of inhalation by the population present in the area [110].
Numerous biomonitors have been used to monitor PCDDs/Fs, including vegetation (pine needles, leaves, grass, vegetables, etc.), birds, fishes, and mollusks.To date, pine needles are the most used biomonitors to evaluate air deposition of PCDDs/Fs, as they can be found worldwide, allowing Advances in Meteorology comparisons between countries.While vegetation is mainly used to provide information on the short-term exposure to PCDDs/Fs, soil samples are also commonly analyzed in order to describe long-term exposure to PCDDs/Fs, since soil is a sink for these compounds [111].
For mosses, Kuik and Wolterbeek [219] found relatively high crustal contributions to the moss levels of elements such as Al, Sc, La, and further lanthanides; D. H. Brown and R. M. Brown [96] suggested that the increase in cation exchange capacity from moss apex to base is part of its natural balance of elements which, in turn, is affected by the proximity of the soil.
Mosses accumulate metals in a passive way, acting like ion exchangers; most of the metals in mosses show a correlation between dry bulk amount and wet deposition concentration [93,215].
Although mosses and lichens receive elements from the atmosphere through wet and dry deposition in areas with widespread geochemical natural and anthropogenic sources of metals, they cannot be used interchangeably as biomonitors, as element compositions of the moss were affected more than that of the lichen by the geochemical features of the region [220].In these environments, epiphytic lichens seem to be more reliable than biomonitors of atmospheric deposition of trace elements, though more sensitive to atmospheric pollution by sulphur compounds.
Malizia et al. [115] employed inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) to assess the concentration of selected heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Mn, Pb, Cr, and Pd) in soil and plants and found that the leaves of Taraxacum officinale L. and Trifolium pratense L. can accumulate Cu and Urtica dioica L. representing the vegetal species can accumulate the highest fraction of Pb.
Atmospheric deposition of heavy metals, using the epiphytic moss genera Fabronia ciliaris collected from six urban sites in the Metropolitan Zone of Toluca Valley in Mexico, revealed that the concentrations of K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Rb, Sr, and Pb (determined by total reflection X-ray fluorescence technique) showed an evidence of anthropogenic impact in the industrial and urban areas, mainly due to the intense vehicular traffic and fossil fuel combustion [116].Concentration of Hg in samples of lichen Hypogymnia physodes, the moss Pleurozium schreberi, and the soil humus collected in Polish and Czech Euroregions Praded and Glacensis showed a statistical similarity to the concentrations determined for other areas located far from significant sources of Hg, with some different surface distributions in the considered regions [114].Introducing a new way of analyzing the results of biomonitoring, based on the comparison factor (CF) (defined as a ratio of a difference between the concentrations of an analyte in lichens and in mosses, to the arithmetic means of these concentrations), they were able to indicate that a deposited bioavailable analyte was amenable to the primary emission and not to the secondary enrichment of the atmospheric aerosol with the local soil pollutants.
An effective air pollution control strategy requires source apportionment of airborne pollutant emission sources and plants may contribute to depict emission scenarios of PM10.P. tobira, a versatile and diffuse evergreen ornamental species in the Mediterranean urban environment, is a suitable passive biomonitor, useful to assess levels and distribution patterns of inorganic solid pollutants in urban areas.The ICP-MS analysis carried out for several elements (Al, Ba, Be, Bi, Br, Ca, Cd, Cl, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, Pb, Si, Ti, V, Zn) and factor analysis allowed identifying three main source groups of elements (crustal components, sea-salt spray, and anthropogenic sources), useful to elucidate sourcereceptor relationships [221].
Due to their features, very often biospecies are employed in survey aimed at describing the distribution of selected elements in some extended areas.For example, the European moss survey has an important role in identifying spatial and temporal trends in atmospheric heavy metal pollution across Europe [222].Recent decline in emission and subsequent deposition of heavy metals across Europe has resulted in a decrease in the heavy metal concentration in mosses for the majority of metals (As, Cd, Fe, Pb, V, Cu, Ni, and Zn), except Hg and Cr, for whom no significant reduction was observed.This route appears essential for monitoring future trends at a high spatial resolution and provides a useful tool for additional validation of modeled atmospheric deposition fluxes.Biospecies, such as mosses, lichens, and plants, provide a cheap, effective alternative to deposition analysis.The goals of these experimental approaches, due to their low cost and spatial distribution, are often focused on the potential role of vegetation for the removal of particulate pollution.

Conclusions
Atmospheric deposition processes, which are important to understand the fate and distribution of organic and inorganic pollutants, have been, for a long time, a topic of minor importance with respect to direct air monitoring in the evaluation of environmental air quality and human health risk assessment.The extreme versatility of the analytical tools recently developed in the study of the atmospheric deposition, the development of new collectors, and new analytical and statistical tools have enabled the use of atmospheric deposition information for assessing the impact of different pollutants on many environmental compartments and to perform the source apportionment to receptor sites at long and short distance from the sources.Different collectors were used to evaluate site-specificity, seasonality, and daily variability of settleable particle concentrations.Monitoring over long periods has revealed that erosion and transport of common soil minerals by means of wind and African dust episodes are highly probable in the Mediterranean area.Atmospheric deposition of POPs (PAHs, PCDDs/Fs, and PCBs) in different parts of the world allowed determining their deposition fluxes, investigating their spatial and seasonal variations, and assessing the influence of emission sources, local population distribution, and Meteoclimatic parameters on monitored levels.The different PAH emission sources were qualitatively identified on the basis of composition profiles represented by different diagnostic ratios.It was found that FLA/PYR ratio higher than 1 is a characteristic of a pyrolytic origin, whereas values lower than 1 are typical of a petrogenic origin, such as coal combustion in Europe and North America.Congener pattern analysis and bulk deposition fluxes in rural sites confirmed a long-range atmospheric transport of PCDDs/Fs in areas characterized by low level contamination and their moderate seasonal variation with higher winter fluxes than during summertime.Metal flux deposition monitoring allowed confirming the role of major roadways as significant sources of localized metal deposition to urban surfaces and of resuspension in the net deposition and dispersion of particulate matter near roadways.Newly designed wet-deposition samplers were also used for the characterization of deposited mercury, which plays an important role due to its toxicological proprieties.Results demonstrated the importance of rain scavenging in the deposition of mercury and the relatively higher magnitude of Hg deposition from Chinese anthropogenic sources, where a significant proportion of the globe total anthropogenic emissions of this metal is located.In recent years, more attention was paid to biological monitors for the detection of metals, sulphur, nitrogen, fluoride, radionuclides, metabolites originated from organochlorine pesticides, and a variety of organic compounds like those aforementioned.The most commonly used organisms for air pollution and atmospheric deposition assessment, conducted in natural and forested ecosystems or in urban environments, were lichens, mosses, pine needles, and plants.Positive correlations were observed between metals in air particulates and transplanted lichens and between wet deposition and metal concentrations in mosses.Moreover, it was demonstrated that PAH concentrations in lichens were comparable with concentrations measured in a conventional active sampler in an outdoor environment.In conclusion, the importance of atmospheric deposition is growing more and more within the scientific community not only for the possibility it offers to analyze the biogeochemical cycle of elements, at both local and global scale, but also for the assessment of the environmental impact of pollutants on soil and water compartments, following the uptake and the fate, from the sources to the receptors.

Figure 2 :
Figure 2: Scheme of a bulk type sampler for Hg [80].

Figure 3 :
Figure 3: Wet and dry deposition fluxes percentage of ions at a site downwind to coal-fired power plants in Northwestern Greece [39].

Table 3 :
List of different collectors used in sampling atmospheric deposition of inorganic pollutants (metals and ions).

Table 4 :
Collectors used in atmospheric depositions of mercury.

Table 5 :
Analysis of total mercury and particulate phase mercury.

Table 6 :
Main features of the different strategies of lichens biomonitoring.

Table 7 :
Annual average dust deposition rates (g m −2 yr −1 ) in different sites throughout the world.

Table 8 :
Annually averaged PAHs deposition fluxes in different monitored sites.

Table 9 :
Comparison of mean wet + dry deposition fluxes (mg m −2 yr −1 ) of trace elements in aquatic regions.

Table 14 :
List of the main analytical techniques and classes used in deposition studies, with acronyms.