Changes in Different Classes of Precipitation and the Impacts on Sediment Yield in the Hekouzhen-Longmen Region of the Yellow River Basin , China

Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Yellow River Conservancy Commission, Zhengzhou 450003, China Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Loss Process and Control on the Loess Plateau, MWR, Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Zhengzhou 450003, China Yellow River Conservancy Commission, Zhengzhou 450003, China Hydrology Bureau of Yellow River Conservancy Commission, Zhengzhou 450004, China School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China Key Laboratory ofWatershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China


Introduction
e Yellow River is known for its large sediment discharge and high sediment concentration, and 98% of its sediment originates from the area above the Shaanxian (Tongguan) station on the main channel of the Yellow River.During the natural period (i.e., , the average annual sediment discharge of the Shaanxian was 1.6 billion tons.However, the sediment discharge of the Yellow River has obviously decreased since the 1980s [1].e average annual sediment discharge of the Tongguan station was only 539 million and 248 million tons for the periods of 1980-2016 and 2000-2016, representing decreases of 66.3% and 84.5%, respectively.Since precipitation is a direct influencing factor on sediment yield, determining changes in precipitation and identifying their impact on sediment discharge have become a topic of great concern in recent years. In this paper, we selected the region from Hekouzhen to Longmen in the middle reaches of the Yellow River Basin (hereinafter referred to as the HLR) as the study area, which is located in the Loess Plateau and represents the most seriously affected area of water and soil loss and is the concentrated source area of sediment and coarse sediment [2]; additionally, this region is one of the three storm flood source areas in the middle reaches of the Yellow River [3].
e soil erosion area occupies 83.45% of the total area in the HLR, and the average annual sediment discharge is 908 million tons, accounting for 57% of the sediment discharge from the Tongguan station; furthermore, the average annual coarse sediment discharge is 223.6 million tons, accounting for 72% of the annual coarse sediment discharge of the Yellow River [2].
To date, many scholars have conducted relevant studies on the changes in precipitation in this region.Kang et al. analyzed the spatial distribution and temporal variation of precipitation in the HLR from 1955 to 1995 [4].Hu et al. found out that compared with the baseline period before 1969, the precipitation in the HLR decreased by 7%, 11%, and 13% in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, respectively [5].Compared with 1956-1996, the precipitation in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River decreased from 1997 to 2006; additionally, the rainfall in July and August in the HLR decreased by 17% [6].Based on the precipitation data collected from 74 rainfall stations located in the five tributaries of the HLR between 1980 and 2009, the precipitation increased slightly during the flood season, but the rainfall intensity was significantly smaller [7].Sun et al. [8] analyzed changes in the mean and extreme temperature and precipitation values in the Loess Plateau between 1961 and 2011 using a gridded dataset and found out that the total amount of precipitation on wet days decreased over a large area of the Loess Plateau, and there were only minor changes in extreme precipitation over the Loess Plateau.Other studies have analyzed the changes in precipitation in the Yellow River Basin by using the observed precipitation data collected at dozens of weather stations by the National Meteorological Bureau [9][10][11][12], and most of the studies focused on the changes in annual precipitation and precipitation during the flood season [13][14][15].In contrast, little research has been focused on the different classes of precipitation that have significant impacts on sediment yield.In view of the uneven spatial distribution of precipitation, we collected data from more additional rainfall stations, which provided more information than the previous studies.
Using the observed precipitation data collected at 301 rainfall stations in the HLR from 1966 to 2016, the objectives of this study were (i) to analyze the spatial distribution and temporal variation in the annual precipitation, different precipitation classes, and rainstorm frequency and (ii) to explore the impacts of precipitation on sediment yield and quantitatively analyze the contribution of precipitation and other factors to sediment yield change.

Study Region.
e study area is the Hekouzhen-Longmen region, which is situated in the middle reaches of the Yellow River (Figure 1), with an area of 111,586 km 2 between 108 °02′∼112 °44′E and 35 °40′N∼40 °34′N, accounting for 14.8% of the total area of the Yellow River Basin [14].e length of the main stream of the Yellow River in the study area is 723 km.ere are 21 large tributaries with a catchment area larger than 1000 km 2 .e high sediment yield area in the HLR is 71,600 km 2 and accounts for 60.1% of the total high sediment yield area in the entire Yellow River Basin; additionally, the high sediment yield area in the HLR accounts for 64.2% of the study area.e terrain is dominated by the gully region of the Loess Plateau and belongs to the temperate continental monsoon climate.e annual average temperature is 6-14 °C, and the average annual precipitation is 290-620 mm and is mainly concentrated in July-September.

Rainfall Stations.
Considering the equal distribution of rainfall stations and the integrity of data, this study used daily precipitation data collected from 301 selected rain gauge stations during the period from 1966 to 2016.e rainfall station locations are shown in Figure 1. e precipitation data of 292 rainfall stations and the sediment discharge data are from the hydrological yearbook and the Hydrological Bureau of Yellow River Conservancy Commission; additionally, data from 9 meteorological stations were provided by China Meteorological Administration (CMA).Among the 301 rainfall stations, a total of 150 rainfall stations were established before 1966; the remaining rainfall stations were established between 1967 and 1976.

Rainfall
Factor.In consideration of the impact of precipitation on sediment yield in the study area, the rainfall factors selected in this paper included annual precipitation (P) and different classes of precipitation.
e different precipitation classes refer to the total annual rainfall values, and categories were divided based on daily precipitation amounts that were greater than 10 mm, 25 mm, 50 mm, and 100 mm, which were expressed as P 10 , P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 , respectively, and were measured in mm. e different classes of precipitation not only reflect the impact of total precipitation on sediment yield but also reflect the impact of precipitation intensity on sediment yield [16].

Regional Average Precipitation.
First, the annual precipitation, P 10 , P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 of each rainfall station were calculated, and then the average precipitation in the entire study area was interpolated by the iessen polygon method.

Rainstorm Frequency.
To objectively reflect the change in the frequency of heavy rain events with daily precipitation higher than 50 mm, the ratio of the number of rainfall stations 2 Advances in Meteorology with daily precipitation greater than 50 mm in a given year to the total number of rainfall stations participating in rainfall measurements in the same year was referred to as the rainstorm frequency.Similarly, the frequency of heavy rainstorms can be calculated by the number of rainfall stations with daily precipitation greater than 100 mm.

Double Mass Curve.
e double mass curve (DMC) method is the simplest, most intuitive, and most widely used method for consistency analysis of long-term evolutionary trends of hydrological and meteorological elements [17,18].

Advances in Meteorology
By establishing a double cumulative curve that excludes the influence of the reference variable, whether another factor leads to significant trend changes in the tested variable is revealed [19].e DMC can analyze changing trends in runoff and sediment discharge, and this method has been widely used in the study on water and sediment effects of water and soil conservation measures [20][21][22].Changes in the slope of the double mass curve between precipitation and sediment discharge reflect changes in sediment discharge that are produced by unit of rainfall.

Mann-Kendall Test.
e Mann-Kendall (MK) test is a nonparametric method and is recommended by the World Meteorological Organization [23][24][25].e MK test does not require samples to follow a specific distribution, and the results are not affected by a few abnormal values.e MK test is suitable for nonnormally distributed data and has been widely used in assessing the changing trends of hydrological and meteorological time series data [26][27][28].e MK test was applied to analyze the changes in precipitation in the study area.e MK test will not be discussed here, as its detailed description can be found in many studies [29,30].Mann-Kendall Z statistics greater than 1.96 indicated a significant increasing trend at the significance level of P � 0.05, while a Z statistic less than −1.96 indicated a significant decreasing trend.

Calculation Method of Precipitation Change.
To eliminate the influence of changes affiliated with the rainfall stations on the calculated average watershed precipitation as much as possible, the establishment time and spatial distribution of the rainfall stations were considered, and the multiyear average annual precipitation from 1966 to 2016 was identified as the reference precipitation.Daily precipitation was collected from 150 rainfall stations established before 1966 for the period from 1966 to 2016, and the spatial distribution of the annual precipitation, P 10 , P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 was spatially interpolated by the iessen polygon method.
e average annual precipitation for the period from 2007 to 2016 was calculated by using the precipitation data collected from all rainfall stations.
e measured data from 1966 to 2016 were used to calculate the average precipitation for all the rainfall stations established before 1966.For the rainfall stations without measured data from 1966 to 1976, the average precipitation from 1966 to 2016 was extracted from the precipitation spatial distribution maps.By comparing the current annual precipitation with the multiyear average precipitation at each station, the annual abundance and spatial distribution of precipitation could be determined for each station.

Quantitative Assessment of the Changes in Sediment Yield.
For a given basin, the changes in observed sediment yield under the impacts of precipitation and other factors can be expressed as follows: where ΔW S is the observed sediment yield difference between the impacted period and the baseline period and ΔW SP and ΔW SH represent the changes in sediment yield due to precipitation and other factors, respectively.To quantitatively identify the impact of precipitation and other factors on the sediment yield changes, the hydrological modeling method can be used.Here, the empirical model was considered due to its good performance in modeling the sediment yield in the middle reaches of the Yellow River Basin [1,31].e relationship between precipitation and sediment yield of the HLR in the baseline period is given as follows [1]: where W S is the sediment yield and P 2.5 is the rainfall factor.e effects of precipitation change and other factors on sediment yield can be calculated as follows: where W S0 is the sediment yield in the baseline period and W S1 and W S2 are the observed and calculated sediment yields in impacted periods, respectively.Taking into account the change in the underlying surface and other factors such as the change in the relationship between precipitation and sediment yield, the baseline period of the HLR is from 1956 to 1977; for more details, the readers can refer to Liu [1].

Spatial-Temporal Variations in Precipitation from
1966 to 2016 4.1.1.Spatial Distribution of Precipitation. Figure 2 shows the spatial distribution of the average annual precipitation and the different classes of precipitation in the study area based on the measured precipitation data from 1966 to 2016.e annual precipitation tended to increase gradually from the northwest to the southeast.P 10 and the annual precipitation had basically the same spatial distribution.However, P 25 and P 50 were mainly concentrated in the northwestern and southwestern parts of the HLR, with annual precipitation amounts of 450-600 mm.   1).Approximately 80%-95% of P 10 occurred from June to September, and few of these events occurred in May and October.Almost all of the P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 events occurred between June and September.e precipitation from June to September in the HLR is mostly characterized by short duration and high rainfall intensity.e variation in the di erent classes of precipitation from 1966 to 2016 is shown in Figure 4.It can be seen that, except for P 25 , the di erent classes of precipitation in 2016 reached the highest observed values since 1966.P 25 reaches its maximum level in 2013, followed by 2016.

Change in Annual Precipitation
According to the MK test results shown in Table 1, there was no signi cant trend in annual precipitation, P 10 , P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 in the HLR from 1966 to 2016.2).

Selection of the Focus Period.
Since 1998, the rate of change in the sediment-producing environment in the Loess Plateau has been unprecedented [1,32].e turning point in the relationship between rainfall and sediment discharge is an important basis for selecting a focus period.
e double mass curve between rainfall and sediment discharge in the HLR is shown in Figure 6.Based on the change in the slope of the double mass curve of rainfall and sediment discharge, the relationship between rainfall and sediment discharge in the study region obviously changed in 1979 and in 2006, and after 2006, the transition of the relationship between precipitation and sediment discharge was much more signi cant than the previous turning point.
Since the 1990s, the e ects of large-scale soil and water conservation measures have signi cantly enhanced the reductions in sediment discharge.e relationship between rainfall and sediment discharge has changed signi cantly and is manifested as the double accumulation points of rainfall and sediment discharge that signi cantly deviate from the sediment transport axis (Figure 6).e rainfall-sediment relationship in the major sediment tributaries in the HLR has an in ection point in the 1970s and 1980s [33], but the turning points in 2004-2008 were more prominent than previously observed [1].Although the annual sediment discharge decreased in the 1970s and the 1980s, the change in sediment concentration was not signi cant during the same periods [1].In fact, until 2004-2008, the annual sediment discharge, the average sediment concentration during the ood season, and the annual   Advances in Meteorology maximum sediment concentration of the major tributaries of the study area decreased considerably [1,34].erefore, we selected 2007-2016 as the focus period, emphasizing the analysis of changes in precipitation in the HLR during this period.

Changes in Precipitation from 2007 to 2016.
Compared with 1966-2016, the annual precipitation and di erent classes of precipitation were all generally more abundant during the focus period.In 2007-2016, the average annual precipitation was 507.6 mm, which was 14.4% higher than the average annual precipitation from 1966 to 2016.Additionally, P 10 , P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 were 20%, 26.4%, 33.5%, and 90.7% higher, respectively (Table 3), and P 100 was particularly abundant.
Except for the northern part of the HLR, the di erent classes of precipitation in the other areas were more abundant (Figure 7).e areas with the most abundant precipitation were mainly located in the central part of the HLR and in the southern part of the region.e area of increasing rainfall intensity was mainly concentrated in the central part of the HLR.
Table 4 shows the proportion of the area with di erent degrees of change in precipitation from 2007 to 2016 compared with 1966-2016 in the HLR.In most of the study area, the annual precipitation was abundant in 2007-2016, which accounted for 86.58% of the study area, while the area with the annual precipitation reduction of more than 5% accounted for 3.56% of the study area (Table 4).From 2007 to 2016, the area with P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 reduction of more than 5% accounted for 7.52%, 11.4%, and 41.67% of the study area, respectively (Table 4).In contrast, the area where P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 were more than 5% higher accounted for 84.40%, 80.11%, and 56.41% of the study area, respectively.

Contribution of P 50 to Sediment Yield.
To learn more about the impact of precipitation on sediment yield, the sediment yield of typical tributaries with daily rainfall higher than 50 mm and the proportion of annual sediment yield in the corresponding year were calculated from 1966 to 1985 (Table 5).e average proportion of sediment yield produced by P 50 was 50.5% in the HLR.Compared with Table 1, although P 50 accounted for only 8.8% of the annual precipitation, the amount of sediment yield produced by P 50 was 50.5% of the total annual sediment discharge, making P 50 the key driving force for sediment yield.
e annual sediment yield of P 50 varied greatly, accounting for 10%-98% of the annual sediment yield in the HLR (Figure 8).

Changes in the Relationship between Rainfall and
Sediment Discharge.It has been proposed that 10 mm of rainfall is the erosive rainfall standard [35], and this value is well correlated with sediment yield [31]. erefore, P 10 was selected to analyze the relationship between rainfall and sediment yield in the HLR (Figure 9).Compared with the period before the 1970s, the relationship between rainfall and sediment yield in 2007-2016 experienced great changes.
e rainfall-sediment yield relationship in 2007-2016 obviously departed from that before the 1970s, and it is di cult to see the response of sediment yield to rainfall.

Attribution of Changes in Sediment Yield.
e hydrological modeling method was employed to estimate the attribution of precipitation and other factors to the changes in sediment yield in the HLR since 1980.e sediment yield reached 936 million tons in the baseline period in the HLR.e hydrological modeling results showed that precipitation led to 225.23, 259.10, 106.30, and −167.79 million ton changes in sediment yield for 1980-1989, 1990-1999, 2000-2009, and 2010-2016, respectively (Table 6).Other factors led to 339.07, 202.47, 650.03, and 1017.14 million ton changes in sediment yield for the four periods, respectively (Table 6).Figure 10 shows the relative contributions of precipitation and other factors to the sediment yield changes since 1980.During the period of 1980-1989, the impact of precipitation was responsible for 39.9% of the sediment yield decrease, while the e ects of other factors were responsible for 60.1% of the sediment yield decrease.Other factors were the main driving factor for the sediment yield changes in the HLR.During the period of 1990-1999, precipitation and other factors were responsible for 56.1% and 43.9% of the sediment yield reduction, respectively, which indicated that precipitation was the main driving factor for the sediment yield change.During the period of 2000-2009, precipitation and other factors accounted for 14.1% and 85.9% of the sediment yield reduction, respectively.Other factors were obviously the driving factor for the sediment yield reduction.During the period of 2010-2016, precipitation and other factors were responsible for −19.8% and 119.8% of the  erefore, 1977 became a year of great concern to all researchers in terms of changes in the water and sediment changes of the Yellow River.Rainfall in 2012, 2013, and 2016 was relatively abundant in recent years, and their rainstorm covered most of the major sediment-yielding areas in the middle reaches of the Yellow River.Speci cally, the heavy rainstorms and rainfall intensities measured in 2016 were the largest from 1966 to 2016 (Figure 11).In 2012 and 2016, high-intensity rainfall events were mainly distributed in the middle and northern parts of the HLR.In 2013, high-intensity rainfall was mainly distributed in the middle and southern parts of the HLR.
In the rainfall situations of 2012, 2013, and 2016, the sediment yield of the HLR reached 142 million tons, 178 million tons, and 108 million tons (Table 7), respectively; additionally, the sediment yield at the Tongguan station reached 206 million tons, 305 million tons, and 108 million tons, respectively.To better understand the impact of precipitation on sediment yield, P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 were calculated for all rainfall stations in 1977, 2012, 2013, and 2016 (Table 7).e results showed that P 25 and P 50 were greater in 2012 and 2013 than in 1977, and P 100 was the same as or lower than the value recorded in 1977; however, the sediment yield of the HLR was 90% and 89% lower than the amount recorded in 1977, respectively.In 2016, P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 were all greater than those in 1977, while the sediment yield of the HLR declined by 93% compared with that in 1977.rough comparative analysis of the precipitation changes in typical years in the HLR, it can be seen that precipitation is not the main cause of sediment yield reduction in recent years, the current underlying surface has changed a lot compared with the period before 1970s [36], and the sediment yield capacity of most tributaries has decreased signi cantly [1].

Comparisons with Similar Studies.
Several studies have investigated the spatiotemporal variation in annual precipitation, extreme precipitation, and erosive rainfall in the Loess Plateau or in the middle reaches of the Yellow River Basin in di erent periods.In this study, we investigated the variations in annual precipitation and di erent classes of    Advances in Meteorology precipitation using high-resolution data, which provided more detailed information than other studies.In general, annual precipitation exhibited no obvious trend in the Loess Plateau for the last decades.For example, Sun et al. and Zhang et al. found that the annual total precipitation showed no obvious trends in the Loess Plateau and in the middle reaches of the Yellow River Basin during 1960-2013 [37,38], respectively; Wang et al. suggested that the region-averaged annual precipitation shows a nonsigni cant negative trend in the Loess Plateau in the period of 1961-2010 [39], which all agree with the results of our study.
Besides, the results reported by Sun et al. and Xin et al. were not completely consistent with the conclusions of our study [8,40].Xin et al. suggested that the annual rainfall and erosive rainfall decreased in the Loess Plateau from 1956 to 2008 [40].Sun et al. found that the total amount of precipitation on wet days decreased over a large area of the Loess Plateau during 1961-2011, particularly in the southeast region [8].e di erences between our ndings and those reported by Xin et al. and Sun et al. are probably related to the di erent research periods and spatial domains adopted by these studies.e decreasing trends were mainly due to the relatively dry period in the 2000s in the Loess Plateau.In this study, we found di erent trends using updated time series, and the precipitation data extended into 2016.According to Figures 3 and 4, annual precipitation and di erent classes of precipitation had increased in the last several years (2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016). is was due to increased precipitation and more frequent storms occurring in recent years in the HLR.Zhao et al. has found the similar pattern for extreme precipitation indices [41].

Changes in the Underlying Surface.
e sediment yield reduction caused by other factors is the total amount of sediment reduction produced by the changes in the underlying surface in the HLR.Vegetation changes, terraces, check dams, reservoirs, irrigation, and channel scouring and siltation are the main underlying surface factors in the study area.Since the late 1970s, numerous soil conservation practices have been implemented in the Loess Plateau (Tables 8 and 9), such as a orestation and construction of level terraces and check dams, to reduce soil erosion [42,43].Some studies indicated that sediment yield reduction in major tributaries in the middle reaches of the Yellow River Basin was mainly caused by the SCP [44,45], which can e ectively reduce the sediment yield by increasing intercepted precipitation and water in ltration, retarding surface runo and trapping sediment [46,47].
With the implementation of the nationwide ecological recovery program (i.e., the "Grain for Green Project" (GGP)) since 1999, the vegetation coverage in the HLR has greatly increased [48].e major factors impacting the e ects of vegetation on sediment reduction are the vegetation coverage and thickness of litter layer and plant roots [49,50].When the percentage of e ective vegetation is less than 35∼40%, vegetation improvement has an obvious impact on reducing sediment [16].Regardless of precipitation, vegetation type, and other underlying surface factors, surface erosion is extremely weak when the vegetation coverage is greater than 70% [51].At the end of the twentieth century, the vegetation coverage in the HLR was mostly 12∼30% [16].With the implementation of GGP, the vegetation coverage in many areas of the HLR in 2010 has reached 40∼60% [16], which has exactly experienced the sensitive period of vegetation change and sediment yield response.e results of turning point detection further reveal that abrupt changes likely have associations with the implementation of SCP and GGP (Figure 6).Di erent types of underlying surface factors had di erent in uences on the sediment yield changes. e proportional e ect of di erent underlying surface factors on sediment yield changes should be further investigated.
With the continuous increase of vegetation coverage, the check dam would be damaged during heavy rains, and the reservoirs and check dams will be gradually lled up and lose the function of sediment retention; the future change trend of sediment yield in the Yellow River Basin still should be further investigated.12 Advances in Meteorology

Conclusions
In this study, based on the daily precipitation data collected at 301 rainfall stations in the HLR from 1966 to 2016, we investigated the spatial and temporal variations of annual precipitation and different classes of precipitation, and the impacts of precipitation on sediment yield were investigated.e main conclusions can be summarized as follows.
Spatially, the annual precipitation and P 10 increased gradually from the northwest to the southeast of the HLR, and P 25 and P 50 were mainly concentrated in the northwestern and southwestern parts of the HLR, suggesting that it was drier in the northwest region than the southeast region of the HLR, and heavy rain was more likely to occur in the northwest and southwest regions of the HLR.ere was no significant trend in annual precipitation, P 10 , P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 in the HLR from 1966 to 2016.
Compared with the multiyear average precipitation from 1966 to 2016, the annual precipitation, P 10 , P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 in the HLR in the period of 2007-2016 were 14.4%, 20%, 26.4%, 33.5%, and 90.7% higher, respectively.e area where P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 were more than 5% higher accounted for 84.40%, 80.11%, and 56.41% of the study area, respectively.e area with P 25 , P 50 , and P 100 reduction of more than 5% accounted for 7.52%, 11.4%, and 41.67%, respectively.e occurrence frequency of rainstorms and heavy rainstorms was also higher in the period of 2007-2016 in the HLR.
e relationship between rainfall and sediment yield during 2007-2016 has changed compared with the period before the 1970s, and the analysis of the impacts of precipitation on sediment yield in typical years showed that precipitation is not the main cause of sediment yield reduction in recent years.e hydrological modeling method was used to quantitatively assess the attribution of precipitation and other factors to sediment yield changes in the HLR since 1980.e results showed that precipitation was the main driving factor for the sediment yield change during the period of 1990-1999, which accounted for 56.1% of the sediment yield reduction.Other factors were the main driving factor for the sediment yield change in the periods of [1980][1981][1982][1983][1984][1985][1986][1987][1988][1989][2000][2001][2002][2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009], and 2010-2016 and were responsible for 60.1%, 85.9%, and 119.8% of the sediment yield decrease, respectively, and other factors were playing a bigger role in the sediment yield change.
is study provided a comprehensive understanding of the variation in precipitation in the HLR and highlighted its effect on sediment yield.e precipitation in the HLR has been more abundant in recent years, although this increase does not explain the significant reduction in sediment yield.Further investigation is required to assess the impacts of underlying surface changes, especially vegetation restoration, on the sediment yield of the Yellow River. is study area is one of the main source areas for the sediment in the Yellow River Basin, and our results are helpful for understanding the cause of the significant reduction in sediment yield observed in recent years.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Sketch map of the study area.
Figure 5 shows the time series of the frequency of rainstorms and heavy rainstorms from 1966 to 2016 in the HLR.e occurrence of rainstorms and heavy rainstorms was high, and the past 51 years can be divided into three periods.e occurrence of heavy rainstorms in 1982-2000 was obviously lower than normal, and only in 1995 and 1996, a large area of heavy rainfall occurred.Rainstorms and heavy rainstorms occurred frequently in the two periods of 1966-1981 and 2001-2016.Especially in 2007-2016, both the average annual frequency of rainstorms and heavy rainstorms and the proportion of precipitation exceeded the multiyear average values (Table

Figure 3 :Figure 5 :
Figure 3: Time series of annual precipitation in the HLR from 1966 to 2016.

Figure 4 :
Figure 4: Time series of di erent classes of precipitation in the HLR from 1966 to 2016.

Figure 6 :
Figure 6: e double mass curve between rainfall and sediment discharge in the HLR.

Figure 8 :
Figure 8: Proportion of sediment produced by P 50 in the HLR from 1966 to 1985.

Figure 9 :
Figure 9: Relationship between rainfall and sediment yield in two periods in the HLR.

Figure 10 :Figure 11 :
Figure 10: Contributions of precipitation and other factors to the changes in sediment yield in the HLR since 1980.

Table 2 :
e frequency and rainfall proportion of rainstorms and heavy rainstorms during di erent periods in the HLR (%).

Table 1 :
Average precipitation in the HLR from 1966 to 2016.

Table 3 :
Changes in precipitation in the HLR from 2007 to 2016.

Table 4 :
e proportion of the area with di erent degrees of change in precipitation from 2007 to 2016 compared with 1966-2016 in the HLR.

Table 5 :
e proportion of sediment yield produced by P 50 in typical tributaries (%).

Table 6 :
Attribution of the change in sediment yield in the HLR since 1980.

Table 7 :
Comparison of precipitation over the heavy rainfall events and the sediment yield of the HLR in typical years.
* S represents the sediment yield of the HLR.

Table 8 :
Quantity of soil conservation practices by 2011 in the HLR.

Table 9 :
Statistics of the quantity of key check dams built in each decade in the HLR.