Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 7607465, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7607465

Research Article

Rare Earth Metal-Based Intermetallics Formation in Al–Cu–Mg and Al–Si–Cu–Mg Alloys: A Metallographic Study

A. M. Samuel,¹ E. M. Elgallad,¹ M. G. Mahmoud,¹ H. W. Doty,² S. Valtierra,³ and F. H. Samuel¹

¹Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC, Canada
²General Motors, Materials Engineering, 823 Joslyn Avenue, Pontiac, MI 48340, USA
³Nemak, S.A., P.O. Box 100, 66000 Garcia, NL, Mexico

Correspondence should be addressed to F. H. Samuel; fhsamuel@uqac.ca

Received 5 September 2017; Revised 6 November 2017; Accepted 28 November 2017; Published 18 March 2018

Academic Editor: Yee-wen Yen

Copyright © 2018 A. M. Samuel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

This study was conducted on Al–Cu–Mg and Al–Si–Cu–Mg alloys containing either 5%La or 5%Ce. Two levels of Ti addition were examined, i.e., 0.05% and 0.15%. Thermal analysis was the only technique used to obtain castings, from which samples were then sectioned for metallographic examination. Based on the results obtained, the following points may be highlighted. Addition of a fairly large amount of RE metals (La or Ce) leads to the appearance of several peaks in the solidification curve between the precipitation of the primary α-Al phase and the (Al–Al₂Cu) eutectic reaction. Although a significant drop in the eutectic temperature is caused by the addition of 5%La or Ce, the corresponding modification of the eutectic Si is marginal. Two main types of intermetallics were documented: a gray phase in the form of sludge with a fixed composition and a white phase in the shape of thin platelets. Due to the high affinity of RE to react with Si, Fe, and Cu, several compositions were obtained explaining the observed multiple peaks in the solidification curve. Judging by the morphology of the gray phase, it is assumed that this phase is precipitated in the liquid state and acts as a nucleation site for the white phase. Lanthanum and Ce can substitute each other.

1. Introduction

The effect of trace Ce additions on the microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 (Al–7Si–0.35Mg) aluminum alloys was analyzed by Tsai et al. [1]. Their results show that two kinds of intermetallic compounds are formed, namely, Ce–23%Al–22%Si and Al–17%Ce–12%Ti–2%Si–2%Mg phases (percentages here and elsewhere are in wt.%). The thermal analysis data reveal that there is no direct relationship between the eutectic growth temperature and the silicon morphology/modification rating [2, 3]. In another study on the effect of rare earth elements’ addition on microstructures and mechanical properties of A356 alloy, Tsai et al. [4] observed the precipitation of AlTiLa(Ce)Mg and AlSiLa(Ce) phases.

Intermetallic phases in nonmodified and Sr-modified Al–Si cast alloys containing mischmetal (MM) were investigated by Elsebaie et al. [5] who reported the formation of two distinct intermetallic phases at high solidification rate with the addition of 6 wt.% MM to A356.2 alloy: (i) a grey sludge phase containing Ti with a high Ce/La ratio (3 : 4 : 1) and low Mg content (0.26 wt.%), and (ii) a white spherical phase with a low Ce/La ratio (1 : 32 : 1) with Sr content of 1.5 wt.% and 0.4 wt.%Mg. This white spherical phase was also observed at low solidification rate, having the same chemical composition but exhibiting larger sized particles. At low solidification rate, a white Chinese script phase, Al₂MMSi₂, is formed with an addition of 6 wt.% of MM with a low Ce/La ratio (1 : 5 : 1) associated with 0.26 wt.%Mg content.

Effect of Ce addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–20%Si alloy was investigated by Joy Yii et al. [6]. The results show that addition of 0.46 to 2.24 wt.% of Ce led to the formation of fine cells consisting of a mixture of eutectic Si particles and intermetallic Al₃Ce and CeAl1.2Si0.8 phases in the Al matrix. In Al–17%Si alloys, La begins to form intermetallics when its concentration exceeds 1 wt.%. The La-rich phase could be represented as AlSi₂La₂ [7]. Differential thermal analysis (DTA) was carried out by Hosseinifar [8] on two alloys with the compositions Al–20.1 wt.%La–19.9 wt.%Mg and Al–15.07 wt.%La–14.93 wt.%Mg; he reported on the precipitation of Al₁₁La₃ at 458.5°C, Al₃La at 554.5°C, and AlLa at 521°C.

According to Bäckerud et al. [9], the onset of different solidification reactions can be determined with the aid of thermal analyses. The crudest interpretation of the phenomena taking place can be obtained by direct observation of the temperature-time curve, as most reactions are exothermic and result in the reduction in the cooling rate or, in some cases, can result in the increase in temperature due to recalescence [9–11]. These analyses can be conducted by inserting either one or more thermocouples in the mold containing the solidifying metal. Differences in temperature can be detected between different thermocouples, or the readings from one of these devices can be derived as a function of time to evaluate the time and temperature at which the reactions take place [12–14].

The present study was undertaken to investigate precipitation of intermetallics in Al–2%Cu–0.5%Mg and Al–8%Si–2%Cu–0.5%Mg alloys containing 5%La or Ce using the thermal analysis technique as the main tool (solidification rate was approximately 0.8°C/s). Samples sectioned from the thermal analysis castings were used for examining the microstructures. Phases were identified using an electron probe microanalyzer equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopic (EDS) and wavelength dispersive spectroscopic (WDS) facilities.

2. Experimental Procedure

The alloys used in this study were supplied in the form of 12.5 kg ingots. The chemical composition of the base alloy used for this research is listed in Table 1. Thermal analysis was used to obtain the solidification curves and to identify the main reactions and corresponding temperatures occurring during solidification of the different melt compositions prepared. Melting was carried out in a cylindrical graphite crucible of 2 kg capacity, using an electrical resistance furnace; the melting temperature was maintained at 750°C while alloying elements were added. Rare earth metals (5%La or 5%Ce) were added in the form of Al–15 wt.%RE master alloys, whereas Ti in the amount of 0.15% was added in the form of Al–5 wt.%Ti–1 wt.%B master alloy.

Table 1: Chemical composition of the two base alloys used in the present work.

Alloy code
Element (wt.%)

Cu
Si
Mg
Fe
Mn
Ti
Zr
V
Ni
Sr
La
Cr

B0
2.40
1.20
0.40
0.40
0.60
<0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

D0
2.40
8.00
0.40
0.40
0.60
<0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

A high sensitivity type-K (chromel-alumel) thermocouple, which is insulated using a double-holed ceramic tube, is attached to the centre of the graphite mold. The temperature-time data are collected using a high-speed data acquisition system linked to a computer to record the temperature-time data every 0.1 second. Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the graphite mold (preheated at 600°C), thermocouple, and thermal analysis setup. From the data obtained, the solidification curves and the corresponding first derivative curves for a number of selected alloys were plotted to identify the main reactions occurring during solidification and their corresponding temperatures. In order to support the data obtained from thermal analysis, DSC runs were carried out in the temperature range 400–700°C at the rate of 10°C/min.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 1: DSC heating and cooling curves of B0-based (a and b) and D0-based (c and d) alloys.

Samples for microstructural characterization were sectioned from the central portion of the casting containing the thermocouple tip as explained elsewhere [3]. The prepared samples were examined by means of a Leica DM LM optical microscope. The grain-size measurements were carried out using a Clemex image analyzer in conjunction with the optical microscope. Phase identification was carried out using an electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) in conjunction with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopic (EDS) and wavelength dispersive spectroscopic analysis (WDS) were required, integrating a combined JEOL JXA-8900l WD/ED microanalyzer operating at 20 kV and 30 nA, where the size of the spot examined was ∼2 µm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. DSC Runs

The DSC heating curves of the B0-based alloys are shown in Figure 1(a). Generally, all the alloys displayed two common endothermic peaks (B and D) at temperatures ranging from 621 to 627°C and 635 to 637°C, respectively. These peaks can be attributed to the melting of white intermetallic phases and α-Al, respectively. Three of the B0-based alloys displayed a small endothermic peak (A) at temperature 576–580°C which may also be related to the melting of white phases. The two Ce-containing B0 alloys exhibited an additional endothermic peak (C) at 625°C in the low-Ti alloy and at 630°C in the high-Ti alloy. This peak corresponds to the melting of the gray-colored Al–Ti–Ce phase. The height of this peak in the latter alloy is noticeably higher than that in the former alloy, which reveals that increasing the level of Ti significantly increased the fraction of the gray-colored Al–Ti–Ce phase. The endothermic peak C did not appear on the DSC curves of the two La-containing B0 alloys, but the endothermic peak D became wider in the high-Ti alloy compared to the low-Ti alloy. It could therefore be suggested that for the La-containing B0 alloys the melting of the gray-colored Al–Ti–La phase occurred in the same melting reaction of α-Al.

Figure 1(b) shows the DSC cooling curves of the B0-based alloys. Two common exothermic peaks appeared on these curves, namely, peaks E and G, at temperatures ranging from 625 to 632°C and 610 to 612°C, respectively. These peaks correspond to the solidification reactions of the α-Al and the white-colored intermetallic phases, respectively. The intermediate exothermic peak (F) at 615°C is due to the formation of the gray-colored Al–Ti–Ce/La phase. The disappearance of this peak from the DSC curve of the low-Ti, Ce-containing alloy may suggest that a small amount of the gray Al–Ti–Ce phase was solidified in the same solidification reaction of the white Al–Si–Cu–Ce phase which is represented by peak G. Evidently, the addition of Ti promotes the formation of the gray-colored Al–Ti–Ce/La phase and consequently increases the intensity of peak F as can be observed by comparing the DSC curves of the low- and high-Ti alloys.

The DSC heating curves of the D0-based alloys are shown in Figure 1(c). The endothermic peaks H, K, and L represent the melting of the Al₂Cu phase, eutectic Si, and α-Al, respectively. The temperatures of these peaks varied with the alloy composition to range from 505 to 507°C, 569 to 573°C, and 586 to 600°C, respectively. The endothermic peaks I and J which occurred at 540°C and 552°C, respectively, could be attributed to the melting of the white-colored Ce-/La-rich intermetallic phases. Taking into consideration the increase in its size with increasing the Ti level whether for Ce- or La-containing alloys, the last endothermic peak (M) which occurred at 599–607°C could be related to the melting of the gray Al–Ti–Ce/La phase. Figure 1(d) shows the DSC cooling curves of the D0-based alloys. The two major exothermic peaks (N and Q) correspond to the solidification reaction of α-Al and the eutectic Si, respectively. The other exothermic peaks, namely O, P, and R, could be due to the solidification of white-colored Ce-/La-rich intermetallic phases. No distinct exothermic peak was displayed by the DSC curve for the formation of the gray Al–Ti–Ce/La phase, which implies that this phase may be cosolidified with α-Al.

3.2. Thermal Analysis

Figure 2(a) presents the solidification curve and its first derivative obtained from the B0-based alloy. According to Elgallad et al. [15], the observed peaks correspond to the successive precipitation of α-Al, α-Fe intermetallic, and (Al–Al₂Cu) eutectic phases. Addition of Si to B0 alloy, giving D0 alloy, resulted in the reduction of the alloy melting temperature from 641°C to 598°C coupled with the appearance of the Al–Si eutectic plateau at 567°C [3], as shown in Figure 2(b). The circled area in Figure 2(b) reveals the presence of undercooling since the Ti concentration is below 0.05%.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: Temperature-time curves and their first derivatives obtained from (a) B0-base alloy showing 1: precipitation of α-Al; 2: precipitation of α-Fe intermetallic phase; 3: precipitation of Al–Al₂Cu eutectic and (b) D0-base alloy showing 1: precipitation of α-Al; 2: precipitation of Al–Si eutectic reaction; 3: precipitation of π-Fe intermetallic phase; 4: precipitation of Al–Al₂Cu eutectic.

Eutectic modification of Al–Si alloys with rare earth metals was studied by Nogita et al. [16]. The authors suggested that all of the rare earth elements caused a depression of the eutectic growth temperature. At best, the RE elements resulted in only a small degree of refinement of the plate-like silicon. Also, many of the rare earth additions significantly altered the eutectic solidification mode from that of the unmodified alloy.

Figures 3 and 4 demonstrate the effect of adding a relatively large amount of RE metals (without or with 0.15%Ti) to both base alloys. Based on these figures, it is clear that these additions resulted in

(1)appearance of several new peaks in the zone between α-Al and (Al–Al₂Cu) eutectic,(2)depression in the (Al–Si) eutectic temperature in D0 alloys (approximately 16°C),(3)increase in the solidification zone by about 18°C.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3: Temperature-time curves and their first derivatives obtained from the B0 alloy series: (a) B0 + Ce; (b) B0 + Ce + Ti; (c) B0 + La; (d) B0 + La + Ti.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4: Temperature-time curves and their first derivatives obtained from the D0 alloy series: (a) D0 + Ce; (b) D0 + Ce + Ti; (c) D0 + La; (d) D0 + La + Ti.

As reported previously by the present authors [3, 17], the observed depression in the eutectic temperature due to addition of RE metals is not necessarily related to modification of the eutectic Si particles as shown in Figure 5. It should be mentioned that only La revealed partial modification but was not as effective a modifier as Sr in the Sr-treated alloys. For example, the Si particle average area is initially 17.85 µm² compared to 15.64 µm² and 10.67 µm² with the addition of 5% of Ce and La, respectively, and 3.2 µm² in the Sr-treated alloy.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 5: Optical microstructures obtained from (a) B0, (b) D0, (c) D0 + 5%Ce + 0.15%Ti, (d) D0 + 5%La + 0.15%Ti alloys, and (e) D0 alloy modified with 200 ppm Sr (no RE was added). Note marginal modification in (c) compared to (b)—see black circled areas.

Figure 6 exhibits the importance of adding Ti in refining the alloy grain size. However, due to the high affinity of Ti to react with the RE metals, this leads to precipitation of a fairly large amount of intermetallics as displayed in Figure 5(d). The nature of these intermetallics will be discussed in the next section. The observed increase in the freezing zone in RE-treated alloys may lead to formation of shrinkage porosity. Since the molten metal was not degassed prior to casting, the volume fraction of porosity may not be reliable.

(a)

(b)

Figure 6: Macrostructures of (a) D0-based alloy and (b) D0 + 5%Ce + 0.15%Ti alloy.

4. Microstructural Characterization

In this section, a series of electron micrographs will be presented to illustrate the effect of the added RE metals without (<0.05%) and with (0.15%) Ti on the morphology and density of the precipitated intermetallics. Figure 7(a) exhibits the microstructure of the base B0 alloy showing the three main phases as described in the previous section. Addition of RE (La or Ce) resulted in the precipitation of an intensive amount of thin, long particles of a white phase. The high-magnification micrograph in Figure 7(c) reveals the platelet-like morphology of this white phase. Addition of Ti + RE caused the precipitation of a gray phase in the form of “sludge” as shown in Figure 7(e)—note the precipitation of the white phase on the edges of the sludge.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Figure 7: Backscattered electron images of (a) B0-based alloy; (b) B0 + 5%La; (c) La-rich platet in (b); (d) B0 + 5%La + 0.2%Ti; (e) high magnification micrograph of the gray phase circled in (d); (f) B0 + 5%Ce; (g) B0 + 5%Ce + 0.2%Ti alloys.

Based on the chemical composition listed in Table 1, the Fe-based sludge should precipitate at about 650°C, which exceeds the melting temperatures of the two alloys. Similarly, the gray-phase particles (judging by their morphology) could as well have precipitated in the liquid state prior to solidification and acted as nucleation sites for the white phase.

From the present results, both La- and Ce-rich precipitates are found to have more or less the same shape, as illustrated in Figures 7(f) and 7(g). In order to distinguish between the different types of particles, WDS and EDS techniques were employed. It should be mentioned as well that similar observations were made when D0 alloy was used; that is, the amount of Si seems to have no bearing on the precipitated phases. Figure 8 reveals the possibility of the precipitation of RE-based intermetallics on the existing Ti-rich particles (possibly Al₃Ti particles). Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the distribution of Ce and La in the gray-phase particles compared to Ti and Si. From these figures, it is evident that Ti is the main element in the gray phase, with traces of RE and Si. Figure 11 shows the distribution of La and Ti in such particles observed in the D0 + La + Ti alloy sample.

(a)

(b)

Figure 8: (a) Backscattered electron image and distribution of Al, Ce, and Ti in D0 + Ce + Ti alloy and (b) EDS spectrum corresponding to the gray phase marked X in (a). (Note the weak peak of Si compared to the Ti peak.)

(a)

(b)

Figure 9: (a) Backscattered electron image and distribution of Ti, La, and Al in D0 + La + Ti alloy and (b) EDS spectrum corresponding to the gray phase marked X in (a).

(a)

(b)

Figure 10: (a) Backscattered electron image and distribution of Ti and Ce in D0 + Ce + Ti alloy and (b) EDS spectrum corresponding to the gray phase marked X in (a). White arrows indicate high Ce concentration in the white-phase particles.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 11: (a) Backscattered electron image and (b) elemental distribution in D0 + La + Ti alloy, (c) X-ray images of Ti, La, and Si in (a), showing the presence of La in the RE-rich plate, EDS spectrum corresponding to the white phase marked X in (a).

Another interesting observation made is the interaction between the RE and transition metals, in particular Cu and Fe. Figure 12 shows the interaction between La and Cu in the D0 alloy containing 0.15%Ti. Lanthanum platelets seem to attract Cu at their edges as shown in Figure 12(b) which is an enlarged portion of Figure 12(a). On the other hand, it is evident that neither Cu nor Si exhibits an affinity to react with the gray phase. Considering the white phase, observed in Figures 13 and 14, Cu has a relatively higher affinity to react with La compared to Fe as inferred from their relative intensities and the size of their corresponding peaks in Figure 13(b). It should be borne in mind that the white platelets are very thin (less than 1.5 nm thick) which would explain the variation in their composition (the diameter of the area examined by the electron beam is ∼3 µm). Based on these observations, it would be reasonable to say that the gray phase (due to its larger size) would exhibit a definite composition overall, whereas the composition of the white phase would vary from one particle to another.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 12: (a) Backscattered electron image and distribution of Cu, Ti, and La in D0 + La + Ti alloy, (b) enlarged micrograph of circled area in (a), and (c) EDS spectrum corresponding to the gray phase marked X in (b). (Note the weak Cu and Si peaks in the gray phase.)

(a)

(b)

Figure 13: La-transition metal interactions in D0 + La alloy: (a) backscattered electron image and corresponding Cu, Fe, and La images and (b) EDS spectrum of white phase circled in (a).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 14: La–Cu interactions in D0 + La alloy: (a) backscattered image, (b) corresponding X-ray images of Si, La, Al, and Cu, and (c) EDS spectrum of white phase circled in (a).

Table 2 summarizes the WDS analysis carried out on the phases observed in the present alloys. The composition of the gray phase could be written as Al₂₁Ti₂RE (RE = La or Ce). The white phase has several compositions caused by its reactivity with the other elements in the matrix, particularly Si, Cu, and Fe. The phases formed in the alloys investigated are as follows:

(1)B0 (low Si)–La-containing alloy: Al₁₁La₃(Cu,Fe)₄Si2, Al₅La₃Si2, Al₆La₂(Cu,Fe)₂Si, and Al₃La(2)D0 (high Si)–La-containing alloy: AlLaSi, Al₂LaSi, and Al₉La₄Cu₂Si₄(3)B0–Ce alloy: Al₄Ce₃Si₂ and Al₁₁Ce₃(Cu,Fe)₄Si₂(4)D0–Ce-containing alloy: Al₂CeSi

Table 2: WDS analysis of the RE-based phases observed in the alloys studied.

Alloy code
Phase/color
Element (at.%)
Suggested formula

Al
Ti
Fe
Cu
Mg
Cr
Si
Ce
La

D0 + 5 wt.%La (with Ti)
1 white
33.13
0.000
0.021
0.269
0.000
0.121
30.26
1.819
34.31
AlLaSi

2 white
34.56
0.000
0.000
0.426
0.000
0.118
27.51
1.955
35.37
AlLaSi

3 white
35.03
0.000
0.000
0.343
0.000
0.102
27.63
1.833
35.01
AlLaSi

4 white
36.57
0.000
0.000
0.290
0.000
0.132
25.93
1.807
35.23
AlLaSi

5 white
34.72
0.000
0.006
0.344
0.000
0.076
27.82
1.775
35.20
AlLaSi

6 white
50.11
0.000
0.000
0.083
0.938
0.028
26.49
1.379
20.95
Al₂LaSi

7 white
45.61
0.000
0.017
8.933
0.674
0.077
22.79
1.133
20.53
Al₉La₄Cu₂Si₄

1 grey
85.74
6.676
0.013
0.469
1.541
0.183
0.801
0.581
3.815
Al₂₁Ti₂La

2 grey
85.39
6.543
0.035
0.606
1.570
0.279
0.919
0.626
3.767
Al₂₁Ti₂La

3 grey
85.48
6.343
0.046
0.707
1.307
0.346
0.888
0.567
3.764
Al₂₁Ti₂La

4 grey
85.20
6.439
0.013
0.588
1.737
0.289
1.033
0.597
3.832
Al₂₁Ti₂La

5 grey
85.33
6.588
0.008
0.691
1.264
0.238
1.262
0.525
3.846
Al₂₁Ti₂La

D0 + 5 wt.%La (without Ti)
1 white
33.07
0.000
0.000
0.272
0.000
0.136
29.68
0.358
36.44
AlLaSi

2 white
31.65
0.000
0.000
0.512
0.000
0.144
30.71
0.406
36.54
AlLaSi

3 white
31.57
0.000
0.031
0.463
0.033
0.093
30.20
0.341
37.18
AlLaSi

4 white
31.46
0.000
0.000
0.513
0.000
0.133
30.07
0.413
37.32
AlLaSi

5 white
32.24
0.000
0.000
0.397
0.000
0.131
29.72
0.380
37.09
AlLaSi

1 grey
84.70
7.469
0.006
0.417
1.098
0.112
1.667
0.102
4.253
Al₂₁Ti₂La

2 grey
84.62
7.388
0.001
0.546
1.063
0.134
1.645
0.109
4.286
Al₂₁Ti₂La (with traces of Si and Cu)

3 grey
84.47
7.417
0.022
0.684
1.092
0.112
1.546
0.086
4.340
Al₂₁Ti₂La

4 grey
84.45
7.357
0.011
0.995
0.959
0.120
1.480
0.092
4.281
Al₂₁Ti₂La

5 grey
84.69
7.528
0.000
0.561
1.412
0.118
1.162
0.097
4.264
Al₂₁Ti₂La

D0 + 5 wt.%Ce (with Ti)
1 white
51.26
0.000
0.000
0.073
0.416
0.001
25.64
21.82
0.710
Al₂CeSi

2 white
45.37
0.000
0.000
0.276
0.391
0.011
28.55
24.59
0.803
Al₂CeSi

3 white
45.49
0.000
0.017
0.292
0.358
0.022
28.42
24.56
0.838
Al₂CeSi

4 white
45.15
0.000
0.014
0.259
0.331
0.000
29.20
24.20
0.810
Al₂CeSi

5 white
51.86
0.000
0.009
0.077
0.480
0.023
25.33
21.46
0.727
Al₂CeSi

1 grey
85.78
6.314
0.014
1.080
0.561
0.104
1.388
4.156
0.042
Al₂₁Ti₂Ce

2 grey
85.40
6.228
0.015
1.410
0.650
0.087
1.431
4.134
0.055
Al₂₁Ti₂Ce

3 grey
84.52
6.255
0.019
1.777
0.548
0.107
1.869
4.265
0.038
Al₂₁Ti₂Ce

4 grey
83.99
6.394
0.008
2.558
0.586
0.087
1.601
4.187
0.042
Al₂₁Ti₂Ce

5 grey
85.53
6.377
0.015
0.946
0.544
0.100
1.659
4.272
0.042
Al₂₁Ti₂Ce (with traces of Si and Cu)

B0 + 5 wt.%La (with Ti)
1 white
56.46
0.000
2.598
14.97
0.023
0.050
9.812
0.119
15.83
Al₁₁La₃(Cu,Fe)₄Si₂

2 white
59.69
0.000
2.384
14.42
0.220
0.020
9.076
0.123
13.97
Al₁₁La₃(Cu,Fe)₄Si₂

3 white
56.64
0.000
2.942
14.43
0.036
0.031
10.12
0.080
15.61
Al₁₁La₃(Cu,Fe)₄Si₂

4 white
46.52
0.000
0.000
3.426
0.000
0.064
18.30
0.145
31.44
Al₅La₃Si₂

5 white
56.33
0.000
2.686
15.70
0.067
0.058
9.508
0.120
15.45
Al₆La₂(Cu,Fe)₂Si

6 white
50.39
0.000
0.000
2.654
0.061
0.099
18.09
0.093
28.52
Al₃La (with traces of Cu, Si, and Fe)

7 white
84.75
7.215
0.014
0.374
2.236
0.172
0.358
0.046
4.343
Al₃La (with traces of Cu, Si, and Fe)

8 white
82.26
6.420
0.053
1.293
3.494
0.247
0.579
0.067
4.351
Al₃La (with traces of Cu, Si, and Fe)

1 grey
84.27
7.317
0.013
0.344
2.726
0.146
0.496
0.038
4.330
Al₂₁Ti₂La (with traces of Cu, Si, Fe)

2 grey
85.22
7.428
0.009
0.258
1.983
0.090
0.333
0.075
4.320
Al₂₁Ti₂La (with traces of Cu, Si, and Fe)

3 grey
84.32
7.730
0.012
0.451
2.099
0.140
0.408
0.019
4.384
Al₂₁Ti₂La (with traces of Cu, Si, and Fe)

B0 + 5 wt.%Ce (with Ti)
1 white
42.15
0.000
0.121
1.428
0.000
0.000
22.34
33.90
0.000
Al₄Ce₃Si₂

2 white
55.71
0.000
2.833
15.79
0.000
0.008
10.00
15.64
0.000
Al₁₁Ce₃(Cu,Fe)₄Si₂

3 white
41.46
0.522
0.105
1.367
0.000
0.032
23.12
33.33
0.000
Al₄Ce₃Si₂

4 white
55.04
0.000
2.782
16.32
0.000
0.000
10.82
14.98
0.002
Al₁₁Ce₃(Cu,Fe)₄Si₂

5 white
44.12
0.000
0.053
0.913
0.000
0.005
22.49
32.38
0.000
Al₄Ce₃Si₂

6 white
85.92
8.113
0.000
0.261
0.568
0.017
0.871
4.205
0.000
Al₄Ce₃Si₂

7 white
86.83
7.153
0.010
0.327
0.820
0.018
0.515
4.247
0.000
Al₄Ce₃Si₂

1 grey
87.19
7.178
0.002
0.348
0.383
0.030
0.619
4.219
0.002
Al₂₁Ti₂Ce (with traces of Cu, Fe, Mg, and Si)

2 grey
87.00
7.292
0.007
0.336
0.447
0.034
0.609
4.193
0.008
Al₂₁Ti₂Ce (with traces of Cu, Fe, Mg, and Si)

3 grey
86.75
7.256
0.019
0.427
0.441
0.018
0.810
4.241
0.000
Al₂₁Ti₂Ce (with traces of Cu, Fe, Mg, and Si)

5. Concluding Remarks

Based on the results obtained in the present study, the following remarks may be highlighted. Addition of a fairly large amount of RE metals (La or Ce) leads to the appearance of several peaks in the solidification curve between the primary α-Al and (Al–Al₂Cu) eutectic phases. Although a significant drop in the eutectic temperature is caused by the addition of 5%La or Ce, the corresponding modification of the eutectic Si is marginal. Two main categories of intermetallics were documented: a gray phase in the form of sludge with a fixed composition and a white phase in the shape of thin platelets. Due to the high affinity of RE to react with Si, Fe, and Cu, several compositions were obtained explaining the observed multiple peaks in the solidification curve. Judging by the morphology of the gray phase, it is assumed that this phase was precipitated in the liquid state and acted as a nucleation site for the white phase. Both La and Ce are substitutable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Amal Samuel for enhancing the quality of the images used in the present article.

References

Y. Tsai, S. Lee, and C. Lin, “Effect of trace Ce addition on the microstructures and mechanical properties of A356 (Al-7Si-0.35 Mg) aluminum alloys,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 609–616, 2011.

E. M. Elgallad, H. W. Doty, S. A. Alkahtani, and F. H. Samuel, “Effects of La and Ce addition on the modification of Al–Si based alloys,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 5027243, 13 pages, 2016.

A. M. Nabawy, A. M. Samuel, S. A. Alkahtani, K. A. Abuhasel, and F. H. Samuel, “Role of cerium, lanthanum, and strontium additions in an Al–Si–Mg (A356) alloy,” International Journal of Materials Research, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 446–458, 2016.

Y. Tsai, C. Chou, R. Jeng, S. Lee, and C. Lin, “Effect of rare earth elements addition on microstructures and mechanical properties of A356 alloy,” International Journal of Cast Metals Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 83–87, 2011.

O. Elsebaie, F. H. Samuel, and S. Al kahtani, “Intermetallic phases observed in non-modified and Sr modified Al–Si cast alloys,” International Journal of Cast Metals Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2013.

S. L. Joy Yii, N. M. Anas, M. N. Ramdziah, and A. S. Anasyida, “Microstructural and mechanical properties of Al-20%Si containing Cerium,” Procedia Chemistry, vol. 19, pp. 304–310, 2016.

H. Yi and D. Zhang, “Modification effect of pure rare earth metal La in as cast Al-17%Si alloys,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 258–364, 2003.

M. Hosseinifar, Physical Metallurgy and Thermodynamics of Aluminum Alloys Containing Cerium and Lanthanum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, 2009, Ph.D. thesisThesis.

L. Bäckerud, G. Chai, and J. Tamminen, Solidification Characteristics of Aluminum Alloys, vol. 2, American Foundry Society, Schaumburg, IL, USA, 1990.

R. D. Shull and A. Joshi, Thermal Analysis in Metallurgy, TMS, Warrendale, PA, USA, 1992.

H. Biloni and W. J. Boettinger, “Solidification,” in Physical Metallurgy, R. W. Cahn and P. Haasen, Eds., pp. 669–842, North Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4th edition, 1996.

R. Colás, E. Velasco, and S. Valtierra, “Castings,” in Handbook of Aluminum: Physical Metallurgy and Processes, G. E. Totten and D. S. MacKenzie, Eds., pp. 591–641, M. Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2003.

J. Hernandez-Sandoval, A. M. Samuel, S. Valtierra, and F. H. Samuel, “Thermal analysis for detection of Zr-rich phases in Al–Si–Cu–Mg 354-type alloys,” International Journal of Metalcasting, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 428–439, 2016.

B. Golbahar, E. Samuel, A. M. Samuel, H. W. Doty, and F. H. Samuel, “On thermal analysis, macrostructure and microstructure of grain refined Al–Si–Mg cast alloys: role of Sr addition,” International Journal of Cast Metals Research, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 257–266, 2014.

E. A. Elgallad, S. A. Alkahtani, H. W. Doty, and F. H. Samuel, “On the mechanical properties and fracture characteristics of Al-2%Cu based cast alloys,” International Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 15–34, 2016.

K. Nogita, S. D. McDonald, and A. K. Dahle, “Eutectic modification of Al–Si alloys with rare earth metals,” Materials Transactions, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 323–326, 2004.

S. A. Alkahtani, E. M. Elgallad, M. M. Tash, A. M. Samuel, and F. H. Samuel, “Effect of rare earth metals on the microstructure of Al–Si based alloys,” Materials, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 45, 2016.