Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2021 (2021), Article ID 9921716, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9921716

Research Article

The Ultrasonic P-Wave Velocity-Stress Relationship and Energy Evolution of Sandstone under Uniaxial Loading-Unloading Conditions

Long Zhang,¹ Zetian Zhang,1,2 Ru Zhang,1,2 Mingzhong Gao,2,3 and Jing Xie¹

¹State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource & Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
²MOE Key Laboratory of Deep Earth Science and Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
³Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Deep Earth Science and Geothermal Energy Exploitation and Utilization, Institute of Deep Earth Science and Green Energy, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zetian Zhang; znthe123@126.com and Jing Xie; xiejing200655@163.com

Received 8 March 2021; Accepted 14 June 2021; Published 23 June 2021

Academic Editor: Andrea Petrella

Copyright © 2021 Long Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

As shallow resources are exhausted, deep resources are gradually being exploited; consequently, mining disasters and accidents have increased significantly over time. During mining, a deep rock mass experiences complex mining-induced stress evolution, damage accumulation, and deformation failure processes, and the mechanical and acoustic properties of the rock constantly change. To better understand the variation in the mechanical and acoustic properties of rock under loading and unloading conditions, uniaxial loading-unloading experiments with real-time ultrasonic P-wave velocity monitoring were conducted on sandstone specimens drilled from a coal seam roof. The test results show that the axial stress level is directly related to the P-wave velocity. A logarithmic relationship exists between the ultrasonic P-wave velocity and stress in the tested sandstones. The wave velocity increase caused by the unit axial pressure increase is significantly lower than that at the initial loading stage after entering the higher stress level. The energy evolution of sandstone during loading and unloading is closely related to the stress loading history and reflects the damage accumulation in the rock. Under elastic loading, the energy accumulation is mainly reflected by an increase in elastic energy, and less energy is dissipated during the elastic loading period. Stress unloading causes high energy dissipation, resulting in irreversible strain and damage accumulation, which provides a good basis for using ultrasonic testing to preliminarily judge the failure of a specific rock and formulate corresponding engineering measures.

1. Introduction

Coal is the major energy source in China, and coal mining practices have been accelerating due to the rapid decline in shallow coal resources, resulting in a significant increase in coal mine disasters and accidents. Deep rock masses with significant stress sensitivity have experienced complex mining stress evolutions during the mining process and disasters, resulting in damage accumulation and deformation failure [1, 2]. The mechanical and acoustic properties of these rock masses constantly change, which undoubtedly increases the difficulty of coal mine disaster prevention and control.

Compared with seismic methods, ultrasonic testing has the advantages of a high operation frequency, good data resolution, easy control of the vibration source, and no specimen damage, so it is widely used in geological engineering, hydraulic engineering, coal mining, petroleum engineering, and many other engineering fields [3]. In petroleum engineering, ultrasonic testing technology is widely used for formation evaluation, and acoustic logging tools have been developed and applied systematically [4–6]. In the field of coal mining, an accurate understanding of the acoustic characteristics of a rock under loading is the basis of using ultrasonic testing technology to detect the deterioration degree and mechanical properties of rocks [7, 8]. The study of the acoustic characteristics of rock can help to further develop the practical application of ultrasonic testing technology to solve complex rock mechanical problems in mining.

Therefore, many studies have been devoted to exploring the P-wave velocity-stress relationship of rock to promote the development of mining disaster prevention and monitoring. Birch [9] proposed that the elastic wave increases with increasing confining stress before it reaches a certain value. Walsh and Brace [10] suggested that a change in the microcracks in rocks affects the mechanical properties of rocks and changes the propagation velocity of elastic waves in rocks. The same conclusion was obtained by Simmons [11] when studying the shear wave velocity of various minerals. During stress evolution, the inner structure of the rock changes, e.g., due to crack opening or closure, introducing a corresponding change in the wave velocity. Sayers [12, 13] conducted research on the stress-dependent P-wave velocity under triaxial stress conditions and revealed the anisotropic characteristics of the P-wave velocity considering the impact of the stress distribution in a fractured rock mass. Yong et al. [14] discussed the spatial evolution of the P-wave velocity field in deformed rocks. Additionally, researchers have established a stress-wave velocity relationship based on a microcrack model [15–17]. Nur [18] studied the variation in the anisotropy characteristics of the equivalent compliance coefficient with stress by acoustic testing. Notably, this relationship is only applicable to the compaction stage of rock. On this basis, Su et al. [19] described the relationship between the P-wave velocity and stress as a quadratic function and carried out calibration experiments on various rock types. Zheng et al. [20] carried out experimental research on the changing law of the P-wave velocity throughout the loading process. It was considered that the change in the P-wave velocity was mainly caused by the change in the density. The development, closure, and penetration of cracks affect the variation in the stress-dependent P-wave velocity. Other researchers [21–23] have obtained a theoretical model of the rock P-wave velocity-stress relationship based on mesostructure analysis by correlating the rock micromechanical parameters with the ultrasonic P-wave velocity. In this previous research, it was generally proven that the propagation velocity of ultrasonic P-waves in a rock matrix is not directly affected by stress, i.e., the velocity of P-wave propagation in a specific medium is determined by the properties of the medium material itself and a constant, and the P-wave velocity evolution is a reflection of the crack development and change in the crack distribution in the rock. Applying an external force to rock can change the state and distribution of cracks in the rock, resulting in a change in the velocity of the P-wave.

Studies have shown that the crack initiation-propagation process and the mechanical behavior of a deep rock mass are responses to the energy transformation drive [24, 25], the catastrophic failure of a rock mass under deep engineering disturbance is essentially a state mutation instability phenomenon driven by energy, and the energy dissipation and release mechanism are the core driving factors of the damage evolution [26]. Energy is the essential characteristic of a physical reaction and the internal factor of material failure. The damage and failure process of rock is closely related to the energy evolution. The deformation and failure of a deep rock mass is always accompanied by the process of energy accumulation, dissipation and release, which is represented by the mutual transformation of the strain energy, internal energy, radiation energy, and kinetic energy of the rock mass. It is difficult to fully and accurately explain the change in the inner structure and the disaster-causing mechanism of rock mass disaster phenomena (such as rock burst, plate crack, and partition fracture) due to deep engineering disturbance from the perspective of static mechanics. It is necessary to study the energy transformation mechanism of the rock damage under various mining-induced-stress loading modes.

In fact, the stresses in rock masses are constantly adjusting with mining at different depths [27–30], resulting in complex stress loading and unloading processes, rock mass damage accumulation, and significant mining-induced deformation and damage, which seriously affect crack propagation and distribution in mining-induced coal and rocks [31]. Xie et al. [32] explored the distribution law of the abutment pressure in a coal seam, analyzed the mining dynamic characteristics of the peak value and position of the abutment pressure in front of the working face under the influence of mining, obtained the dynamic stress conditions due to mining of the coal body in front of the working face, and further carried out experimental research on the dynamic behavior of rock during coal mining. Wu et al. [33, 34] described the entire creep process of salt rock under triaxial loading, especially the creep characteristics in the accelerated creep stage, by replacing the Newtonian dashpot in the Maxwell model with the variable-order fractional derivative component and extending it from one to three dimensions. Zhang et al. [35] further established an anisotropic coal permeability model considering the mining stress, fracture evolution, and gas adsorption-desorption effect. The definition of rock damage based on microcrack propagation has certain theoretical significance, but in practice, it is fairly difficult to obtain microcrack scale parameters. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a real-time detection and evaluation method for rock damage based on ultrasonic testing. By exploring the relationship between the stress and wave velocity of rock during the loading and unloading processes, the damage accumulation and energy transformation mechanism of rock can be quantitatively analyzed, which provides a theoretical basis for systematically analyzing the damage accumulation process of rock during mining-induced stress loading and unloading conditions with ultrasonic testing technology.

Therefore, to obtain a better understanding of the damage and failure of mining-induced rock, a study of the P-wave velocity-stress relationship and energy evolution of rock is presented here. Based on laboratory tests of the deformation damage and P-wave velocity of the roof sandstone under uniaxial loading-unloading conditions, the dynamic elastic mechanical parameters of this rock are obtained. Then, the energy-driven damage evolution of rock under different stress levels is quantitatively analyzed, and the model of the relationship between stress and P-wave velocity of sandstone is also established, which can provide a good basis for using ultrasonic testing to preliminarily judge the failure of a specific rock and formulate corresponding engineering measures.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Preparation and Experimental Scheme

The sandstone specimens were obtained from the Tashan Coal Mine (113°6′E, 39°55′N). The cylindrical sandstone specimens for the uniaxial loading-unloading tests were drilled from different sandstone strata in the coal seam roof but at approximately the same depth of 500 m and prepared according to the suggested method of the ISRM [36]. The basic physical information and experimental results of the sandstone specimens are shown in Table 1. E and ν in Table 1 are Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio, respectively.

Table 1: Basic information and testing results of roof sandstone specimens.

Specimens
Diameter (mm)
Length (mm)
Density (g/cm³)
σc (MPa)
E (GPa)
ν

US1
49.36
94.97
2.553
82.058
23.927
0.283

US2
49.25
96.34
2.566
143.673
33.986
0.154

US3
49.88
92.86
2.647
68.644
12.259
0.283

To simply simulate the mining-induced stress disturbance conditions of the roof sandstone near the mining face, the testing scheme was carried out during the loading and unloading processes. Two stages of cyclic loading and unloading were adopted first and then loading was applied to failure. The restarting point of the loading cycles was set as 5 MPa, and the maximum cyclic load was set as 60–70% of the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of the sandstone specimens determined from a direct uniaxial compression test, i.e., the average UCS was 100 MPa, close to the crack initiation stress level. The specific selection of the maximum cyclic load was based on the real-time change in wave velocity. The stress corresponding to the appearance of the wave velocity platform was selected as the peak stress of the loading and unloading cycle. During loading and unloading, the loading rate was set as 60 kN/min. In the final loading stage, the loading rate of the specimens was controlled at a circumferential deformation rate of 0.04 mm/min to obtain a complete stress-strain curve and a possible postpeak P-wave stress relationship.

Throughout the testing process, the ultrasonic P-wave velocity of the sandstone specimens was tested every 3 seconds. The propagation time of the P-wave in the specimens was determined by recording the P-wave form, and then the real-time P-wave velocity and evolution of the specimens in the loading process were obtained by considering the collected data.

2.2. Experimental Equipment and Data Processing

All experiments were carried out utilizing the MTS815 rock mechanics testing system of Sichuan University. The maximum axial compressive load of this machine was 4600 kN. The range of the axial extensometer was ±4 mm. The range of the transverse extensometer was −2.5∼12.5 mm. The test accuracy of each test sensor was within 0.5% of the reading (RD). The ultrasonic P-wave velocity was monitored and recorded by a digital phosphor oscilloscope (TDS3014, Tektronix, USA), pulser-receiver (5077PR, Olympus, Japan), and data acquisition controller (3499B, Agilent, USA), which work in combination with the MTS815 system and constitute the real-time monitoring and display of the P-wave in the rock mechanics tests. This system provided the hardware required for the study of the relationship between the P-wave velocity and stress. Figure 1 shows the configuration of the MTS815 system and ultrasonic instruments.

Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the coupling of the acoustic testing system and MTS815 system.

According to the strength and density of the sandstone specimens, a pulse voltage signal of 400 V was selected for this testing. The excitation and reception frequencies of the P-wave were both 500 kHz. As shown in Figure 1, pure lead foils with a thickness of 0.3 mm were added at the ends of the samples to eliminate the effect of the end unevenness of the specimens. In this testing, the setting file was run first, and the pulse voltage was triggered automatically according to the preset time increment in the setting file.

The real-time P-wave velocity data of each test piece were output as a WFM file. The real-time P-wave velocity of each timing point was viewed and calculated by using Acoustic P-waveform Viewer software and was stored as a VEL file, which was converted into an Excel file. Combined with the loading data recorded by the MTS815 testing machine, the real-time analysis of the relationship between the P-wave velocity characteristics and the stress was carried out by taking time as an intermediate variable. The propagation time of the P-wave was the time between the starting point of the excited pulse voltage and the starting point of the received P-waveform. For the P-waveform signals recorded during the loading process of the sandstone specimens, the P-wave velocity was calculated with the following expression [37]:

where is the P-wave velocity (m/s); Tp1 is the time when the P-wave starts to propagate; Tp2 is the time when the receiving probe receives the P-wave; L is the length of the specimen before it is loaded (m); and ε₁ is the strain along the P-wave propagation direction produced in the test specimens during loading.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Mechanical Behavior of Sandstone under Loading and Unloading Conditions

The complete stress-strain curves of the sandstone specimens are shown in Figure 2. During the initial loading stage, the sandstone samples show obvious nonlinear deformation characteristics when the axial stress level is within approximately 30% of the peak strength. During uniaxial loading-unloading, the specimen is always in a state of compression in the axial direction and in a state of expansion in the circumferential direction. The testing results shown in Table 1 also indicate that the UCS of sandstone is highly correlated with its elastic modulus. The greater the elastic modulus of sandstone specimens is, the greater the UCS is. The loading and unloading results remain in the elastic loading section, so the stress-strain curve loops corresponding to these two cycles coincide. However, axial stress unloading still causes damage to the sample, so the initial loading curve and reloading curve do not coincide.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2: Stress-strain curves of the sandstone specimens: (a) US1; (b) US2; (c) US3.

During the loading and unloading processes, when the stress is less than approximately 30% of the peak strength, nonlinear deformation of sandstone the samples arises, similar to that in the initial loading section, which indicates that the compressibility of the pores and fractures in the sandstone samples is nonlinear. During the loading process, the extents of the compression of the sandstone pores and fractures are different under different stress levels, which directly leads to the differential evolution of the acoustic characteristics of roof sandstones.

In addition, the parts of the stress-strain curves corresponding to the last loading process are similar to those of a typical rock specimen under uniaxial loading, which can be generally divided into four stages [38], i.e., compaction, elastic deformation, plastic deformation, and failure. During loading and unloading, a hysteretic effect is generated and results in a plastic hysteretic loop in the stress-strain curve, accompanied by the dissipation of energy in the specimens.

3.2. The P-Wave Velocity-Stress Relationship of Loaded Roof Sandstone

3.2.1. Evolution of the P-Wave Velocity of Sandstone under Uniaxial Loading-Unloading Conditions

The relationships between the P-wave velocity and the stress of the specimens during uniaxial loading-unloading are shown in Figure 3 and can be divided into 5 stages according to the branch of each loop, namely, the L1, U1, L2, U2, and L3 stages. The P-wave velocity of sandstone is directly related to the axial stress. During the initial loading of the specimen, the P-wave velocity increases rapidly. With an increase in the axial stress, the increase in the P-wave velocity slows. During unloading, the P-wave velocity decreases with the decrease in axial stress, and then during reloading and unloading, the wave velocity changes with the increase and decrease in axial stress, similar to the previous observations. The P-wave velocity changes slowly at high stress levels and rapidly at low stress levels. When the axial stress continues to increase beyond the maximum stress of the previous loading process, the P-wave velocity exhibits a certain increase from the previous highest P-wave velocity, but the increment of the P-wave velocity is small.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3: P-wave velocity-stress curves of the sandstone specimens: (a) US1; (b) US2; (c) US3.

The influence of stress on ultrasonic P-wave velocity during uniaxial compression is mainly due to the closure and expansion of microcracks. In the initial stage of the load increase, the microcracks in the specimen quickly close, and the P-wave velocity increases greatly. As the axial stress increases, the microcracks are further compacted and closed, and the P-wave velocity further rises. However, the decrease in the extent of crack closure causes the rate of increase in the P-wave velocity to slow. In the L3 stage, when the axial stress level exceeds 50∼85% of its UCS, the structure, such as the cracks in the test piece, cannot be further compressed, the P-wave velocity basically reaches the maximum value, and the peak value changes little afterward. The P-wave velocity reaches the maximum value shortly before the loading stress reaches the maximum value, and there is a stage with a constant velocity. In the unloading stage, due to the decrease in axial stress, the originally closed pores and cracks reopen, and the compactness between particles weakens. This results in a decrease in the P-wave velocity. However, the specimen has a certain memory effect on the load cycle process, so the P-wave velocity at the beginning of the second cycle is significantly higher than that at the beginning of the first cycle. This behavior is caused by the permanent closure of some of the fractures and pores during the compression stage, which cannot be opened after the stress is reduced.

During uniaxial loading-unloading, when the axial stress reaches its maximum and minimum values, the P-wave velocity also reaches its maximum and minimum values. The peaks of the P-wave velocities of the L1 and L2 stages of US1 and US3 remain approximately the same. This result shows that the pores and fractures that were closed in the loading stage reopen in the unloading stage, and the close contact state between particles is relieved to some extent, while the cyclic load has no great influence on the recovery of opening and closing. For US2, the peak value of the P-wave velocity in the L2 stage is smaller than that in the L1 stage, indicating that the first loading and unloading cycle caused irreversible damage to the sample and that the pores and fractures that opened in the L1 stage do not completely recover in the U1 stage.

3.2.2. Nonlinear Relationship between the Ultrasonic P-Wave Velocity and Stress

According to the previous analysis results, in the initial stress loading stage, the variation in the P-wave velocity is considerable, but as the stress level reaches a certain value, the increase in the P-wave velocity slows and becomes stable. This phenomenon shows that the relationship between the stress and P-wave velocity can be fitted by a logarithmic function:

where k is the fitting parameter and is the initial P-wave velocity of the sandstone specimen.

Based on (2), the relationships between the P-wave velocity and stress of the three sandstone specimens under uniaxial loading-unloading are shown in Table 2. Since the trend of the relationship in each stage is the same, only the relationship between the P-wave velocity and stress in the L₁ stage is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4 shows that the P-wave velocity changes rapidly when the axial pressure is low, while it changes slowly when the axial pressure is high, and the fitting results are consistent with the experimental results. The minima observed in the velocity-stress curve in Figure 4(b) are likely related to the development of pores and fractures in the US2 sample during the initial loading process, which is also consistent with the test results of the relationship between the peak wave velocities corresponding to the peak stress levels during the two loading and unloading cycles.

Table 2: Fitting results of the relationship between the P-wave velocity and stress of the sandstone specimens.

Specimens
Stage
k

Relationship function
R²

US1
L₁
115.00
3805.5

0.97

U₁
109.17
3844.8

0.98

L₂
128.81
3762.1

0.97

U₂
106.85
3849.2

0.99

L₃
88.92
3881.7

0.93

US2
L₁
182.67
4190.0

0.91

U₁
158.64
4338.3

0.94

L₂
166.67
4265.0

0.93

U₂
168.85
4278.8

0.98

L₃
169.22
4288.1

0.98

US3
L₁
424.60
2217.4

0.98

U₁
356.03
2534.4

0.99

L₂
446.74
2146.3

0.96

U₂
380.12
2449.0

0.99

L₃
391.17
2322.5

0.96

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 4: Relationship between the P-wave velocity and stress in the L1 stage of the sandstone specimens: (a) US1; (b) US2; (c) US3.

The functions, parameter values, and correlation coefficients of each stage are all shown in Table 2 for all three specimens. The correlation coefficients of the fitting results of different rock specimens at different stages are all high, indicating that the logarithmic function can accurately reflect the relationship between the P-wave velocity and stress of the specimens. The parameter k of the sandstone specimens is calculated. is the P-wave velocity value of the rock specimens without loading, which has no relationship with stress and is related to the inherent properties of specimens. The parameter k mainly reflects the sensitivity of the P-wave velocity to stress. The greater the k value, the faster the variation in the P-wave velocity and the stronger the stress sensitivity of the P-wave velocity in the sandstone specimens. According to the k value corresponding to the three loading processes shown in Table 2, after two loading and unloading cycles, the wave velocity-stress sensitivity of sandstone samples decreases.

Notably, although the relationships between stress and P-wave velocity obtained here have the same form, the magnitudes vary greatly among the samples. Therefore, in the process of in situ rock acoustic testing, it is necessary to test specific samples to obtain the relevant parameters of the corresponding engineering rock masses.

3.3. The Energy Evolution of Sandstone under Uniaxial Loading-Unloading Conditions

The deformation and failure process of rock is accompanied by the accumulation and release of energy. The law of conservation of energy in rock is as follows [26]:

where U is the energy input from the outside; Ue is the elastic energy accumulated in the rock; and Ud is the energy dissipated in the process of rock deformation and failure.

Generally, the stress-strain curve corresponding to rock loading and unloading is used to calculate the elastic properties. For the convenience of calculation, the elastic energy Ue is properly simplified. The energy of each part of the rock element in the principal stress space can be expressed as follows [28]:

where E₀ is the initial elastic modulus and ν is Poisson’s ratio. According to the energy evolution of the sandstones during uniaxial loading-unloading in Figure 5, the loading and unloading of sandstone change in three stages: compaction (OA), elastic (AB), and crack growth (BC).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 5: Energy evolution of sandstones during uniaxial loading-unloading: (a) US1; (b) US2; (c) US3.

During the compaction stage, the energy in the loading stage increases slowly. The elastic energy stored in the compaction stage is small, and the energy dissipated during the initial pore compaction and fracture closure of the rock specimens is larger. The dissipated energy corresponding to point A represents the energy consumed by compacting the initial fractures and pores in the rock specimens. In the elastic stage, the total energy and absorbed elastic energy increase with the increase in loading. The curves of the total energy absorbed and elastic energy basically develop in parallel. The work done by external forces is mainly stored in the form of elastic energy. The curve of the dissipated energy in this stage plateaus or slowly increases. The dissipated energy of sandstone increases slowly in the process of loading, increases rapidly at the beginning of unloading, and tends to be stable in the later stage of unloading. When the stress reaches yielding point B, irrecoverable damage in the specimens accumulates. In the crack growth stage, the total absorbed energy continues to increase, and the elastic energy reaches the maximum at the peak strength. The most obvious feature of the crack growth stage is that the rate of increase in the dissipated energy becomes faster.

According to Figure 5, the unloading point of cyclic loading and unloading is approximately 60–70% of the UCS, which approximately corresponds to end point B of the elastic stage. The disturbance is mainly in the elastic stage, including a small part of the compaction stage. At point B, at the end of the elastic stage, the cyclic disturbance has already produced certain damage to the rock specimens but has not yielded. The greater the dissipated energy at point B is, the more the energy accumulation capacity decreases. Furthermore, in engineering practice, the state of the geostress determines the amount of energy released during excavation. With a high geostress, a considerable amount of elastic energy is stored before the excavation of the rock mass. After underground excavation, engineering-induced stress unloading and the release of energy may cause disasters such as rock bursts. Therefore, unloading or disturbing the rock mass ahead of such work can reduce the elastic energy stored in the rock, thereby reducing the strength of rock bursts.

4. Conclusions

The sandstone samples show obvious nonlinear deformation characteristics when the axial stress level is within approximately 30% of the peak strength. During the loading process, extents of the compression of the sandstone pores and fractures are different under different stress levels, which directly leads to the differential evolution of the acoustic characteristics of roof sandstones.

The ultrasonic P-wave velocity is strongly correlated with the axial stress applied to the sandstone specimen in the process of uniaxial loading and unloading, exhibiting a logarithmic relationship. The P-wave velocity presents a nonlinear evolution with the rise and fall of stress. When the axial stress exceeds 50∼85% of the UCS of the sandstone, the P-wave velocity change caused by a unit of axial pressure increase is significantly lower than that in the initial loading stage. After previous loading and unloading processes, the wave velocity-stress sensitivity of sandstone decreases. In the later stage, corresponding to the destruction of the specimen, the wave velocity decreases obviously.

The energy evolution of sandstone during loading and unloading is closely related to the stress loading history and reflects the accumulation of damage in the rock. Under elastic loading, the energy accumulated is mainly elastic energy, and the energy dissipation is weaker during the elastic loading period. However, stress unloading will cause a strong energy dissipation process, resulting in irreversible strain and damage accumulation.

Through the accurate prediction of the nonlinear relationship of stress and P-wave velocity, the distribution of the regional stress field can be obtained directly through wave velocity measurement by using technical methods, which can guide the stress field adjustment and surrounding rock stability support measures based on energy theory and ensure engineering safety. The results of this research provide a good basis for using ultrasonic testing to preliminarily judge the failure of a rock mass and formulate corresponding engineering measures.

Data Availability

The data will be available according to the application.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 51804204 and 52004167), the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining (no. SHJT-17-42.13), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2019T120841), the Applied Basic Research Programs of Sichuan Province (nos. 2019YJ0136 and 2021YJ0411), and the Open Foundation of MOE Key Laboratory of Deep Underground Science and Engineering (no. DUSE201805).

References

D. Ma, J. Zhang, H. Duan et al., “Reutilization of gangue wastes in underground backfilling mining: overburden aquifer protection,” Chemosphere, vol. 264, no. 1, Article ID 128400, 2021.

P. Huang, J. Zhang, N. J. Damascene, and Z. Wang, “Effect of loading rate on mechanical behavior of coal samples with initial damage accumulation,” Mechanics of Time-dependent Materials, 2021.

D. Ma, H. Duan, Q. Zhang et al., “A numerical gas fracturing model of coupled thermal, flowing and mechanical effects,” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 2123–2141, 2020.

C. A. Barton, M. D. Zoback, and K. L. Burns, “In-situ stress orientation and magnitude at the Fenton Geothermal Site, New Mexico, determined from wellbore breakouts,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 467–470, 1988.

W. Kuang, M. Zoback, and J. Zhang, “Estimating geomechanical parameters from microseismic plane focal mechanisms recorded during multistage hydraulic fracturing,” Geophysics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. KS1–KS11, 2017.

M. J. Ramos, D. N. Espinoza, E. J. Goldfarb, N. Tisato, S. E. Laubach, and C. Torres-Verdín, “Microstructural controls on elastic anisotropy of finely laminated Mancos Shale,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 991–1004, 2018.

W. Li, X. Liu, L Liang, and Y. Zhang, “Pore-structural characteristics of tight fractured-vuggy carbonates and its effects on the P- and S-wave velocity: a micro-CT study on full-diameter cores,” Energies, vol. 13, Article ID 6148, 2020.

L. Bei, H. Pan, X. Wang, and F. Li, “Evaluation of different CH₄-CO₂ replacement processes in hydrate-bearing sediments by measuring P-wave velocity,” Energies, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 6242–6254, 2013.

A. F. Birch, “The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars,” Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, vol. 65, Article ID 01083, 1960.

J. B. Walsh and W. F. Brace, “Elasticity of rock: a review of some recent theoretical studies,” Rock Mechanics and Engineering Geology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 283–297, 1966.

G. Simmons, “Velocity of compressional waves in various minerals at pressures to 10 kilobars,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1117–1121, 1964.

C. M. Sayers, J. G. Van Munster, and M. S. King, “Stress-induced ultrasonic anisotrophy in Berea sandstone,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstracts, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 429–436, 1990.

C. M. Sayers, “Stress-induced ultrasonic wave velocity anisotropy in fractured rock,” Ultrasonics, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 311–317, 1988.

C. Yong, X. Yang, and B. Han, “Spatial velocity variations of P waves during rock deformations,” Acta Seismologica Sinica (Chinese edition), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 54–59, 1990.

X. Li, C. Qi, and Z. Shao, “A microcrack growth-based constitutive model for evaluating transient shear properties during brittle creep of rocks,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 194, pp. 9–23, 2018.

K. Ravi-Chandar and W. G. Knauss, “An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: III. On steady-state crack propagation and crack branching,” International Journal of Fracture, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 141–154, 1984.

Z. Wang, J. Ning, and H. Ren, “Frequency characteristics of the released stress wave by propagating cracks in brittle materials,” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, vol. 96, pp. 72–82, 2018.

A. Nur, “Effects of stress on velocity anisotropy in rocks with cracks,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 2022–2034, 1971.

W. H. Su, S. S. Peng, S. Okubo, and K. Matsuki, “Development of ultrasonic methods for measuring in-situ stresses at great depth,” Mining Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–42, 1983.

G.-P. Zheng, X.-D. Zhao, J.-P. Liu, and Y.-H. Li, “Experimental study on change in acoustic wave velocity when rock is loading,” Journal of Northeastern University, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1197–1200, 2009.

C. M. Sayers, “Stress-dependent elastic wave velocities in shales,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstracts, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 263–267, 1995.

T. Takemura and M. Oda, “Changes in crack density and wave velocity in association with crack growth in triaxial tests of Inada granite,” Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, vol. 110, no. B5, pp. 2701–2711, 2005.

G. G. R. Buchbinder, “Precise P and S wave velocity variations, crack density, and saturation changes,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 86, no. B2, pp. 1042–1046, 1981.

L. Zhang, F. Meng, Z. Wang, and Y. Cong, “Energy evolution analysis and failure criteria for rock under different stress paths,” Acta Geotechnica, vol. 16, no. 9, 2020.

Y. Luo, G. Wang, X. Li et al., “Analysis of energy dissipation and crack evolution law of sandstone under impact load,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 132, Article ID 104359, 2020.

R. Peng, Y. Ju, F. Gao, and H. Xie, “Energy analysis on damage of coal under cyclical triaxial loading and unloading conditions,” Journal of China Coal Society, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 245–252, 2014.

E. Zha, S. Wu, Z. Zhang, and R. Zhang, “Mining-induced mechanical response of coal and rock at different depths: a case study in the Pingdingshan Mining Area,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 13, no. 19, pp. 1–11, 2020.

Z. Jia, C. Li, R. Zhang et al., “Energy evolution of coal at different depths under unloading conditions,” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 4637–4649, 2019.

Z. Zhang, H. Xie, R. Zhang et al., “Deformation damage and energy evolution characteristics of coal at different depths,” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1491–1503, 2019.

Z. Zhang, R. Zhang, S. Wu, J. Deng, Z. Zhang, and J. Xie, “The stress sensitivity and porosity sensitivity of coal permeability at different depths: a case study in the pingdingshan mining area,” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1539–1563, 2019.

Z. Zhang, H. Xie, R. Zhang, M. Gao, T. Ai, and E. Zha, “Size and spatial fractal distributions of coal fracture networks under different mining-induced stress conditions,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 132, Article ID 104364, 2020.

H. P. Xie, H. Zhou, F. Gao, and J. Liu, “Mining-induced mechanical behavior in coal seams under different mining layouts,” Journal of China Coal Society, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1067–1074, 2011.

W. Fei, L. Jie, Z. Quanle, L. Cunbao, C. Jie, and G. Renbo, “A triaxial creep model for salt rocks based on variable-order fractional derivative,” Mechanics of Time-dependent Materials, 2020.

F. Wu, H. Zhang, Q. Zou, C. Li, J. Chen, and R. Gao, “Viscoelastic-plastic damage creep model for salt rock based on fractional derivative theory,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 150, Article ID 103600, 2020.

Z. Zhang, R. Zhang, H. Xie, M. Gao, E. Zha, and Z. Jia, “An anisotropic coal permeability model that considers mining-induced stress evolution, microfracture propagation and gas sorption-desorption effects,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 46, pp. 664–679, 2017.

J. W. Dudley, M. Brignoli, B. R. Crawford et al., “ISRM suggested method for uniaxial-strain compressibility testing for reservoir geomechanics,” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 4153–4178, 2016.

S. Y. Gong, L.-M. Dou, X.-J. Xu, and H. Jiang, “Experimental study on the correlation between stress and P-wave velocity for burst tendency coal-rock samples,” Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 67–71, 2012.

C. D. Martin, “Seventeenth Canadian geotechnical colloquium: the effect of cohesion loss and stress path on brittle rock strength,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 698–725, 1997.