Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Volume 2021 (2021), Article ID 5539459, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5539459

Research Article

Influence of Gallic Acid and Thai Culinary Essential Oils on Antibacterial Activity of Nisin against Streptococcus mutans

Pimsumon Jiamboonsri¹ and Pimpikar Kanchanadumkerng²

¹Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
²Department of Food Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand

Correspondence should be addressed to Pimsumon Jiamboonsri; pimsumon.ji@kmitl.ac.th

Received 26 February 2021; Revised 2 April 2021; Accepted 12 April 2021; Published 26 April 2021

Academic Editor: Mohd Esa Norhaizan

Copyright © 2021 Pimsumon Jiamboonsri and Pimpikar Kanchanadumkerng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Streptococcus mutans is a well-known oral pathogen commonly associated with a normal dental problem and life-threatening infection. A bacteriocin nisin and the plant-derived compounds including gallic acid (GA) and Thai culinary essential oils (EOs) have been reported to have activity against oral pathogens. However, their synergistic interaction against S. mutans has not been explored. The purposes of this study were primarily to investigate anti-S. mutans properties and the antibiofilm formation of nisin, GA, and five EOs by using the broth microdilution method. Besides, the morphological change, killing rate, and antibacterial synergism were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), time-kill assay, and checkerboard method, respectively. The results demonstrated that kaffir lime leaf (KLL) oil, lemongrass (LG) oil, and GA showed a potent anti-S. mutans activity and inhibited biofilm formation with the possible mechanism targeted on the cell membrane. Additionally, KLL oil revealed anti-S. mutans synergism with GA, LG oil, and chlorhexidine with the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indexes ≤ 0.5. Interestingly, GA displayed a high potential to enhance anti-S. mutans activity of nisin by lowering the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to at least 8-fold in a bacteriostatic manner. These results suggest that GA and KLL oil may be potentially used as an adjunctive therapy along with nisin and chlorhexidine to control S. mutans infection.

1. Introduction

A Gram-positive streptococcal bacterium, S. mutans, is an important oral pathogen that can cause common dental caries in humans and life-threatening infectious diseases such as infective endocarditis after entering the blood circulation [1]. To prevent the dental problems and the resulting complication, dental hygiene is necessary throughout the human lifespan [2, 3]. The virulence determinant produced by S. mutans is the formation of cariogenic biofilms or dental plaques, which protect the sessile bacteria from antibacterial compounds. Therefore, potential strategies to combat S. mutans are the inhibition of biofilm development and eradication planktonic cells [4]. Although mechanical cleaning is an effective approach to remove the cariogenic species and biofilms, the chemical antibacterial agents have been beneficially added to many oral healthcare products for similar purposes [5]. However, long-term use of chemical agents can cause teeth discoloration and disturbance of physiological microbiota [6, 7]. Moreover, the clinically essential antiseptic or antibiotic agents are not worth for treatment of common oral diseases due to an increase in multidrug-resistant bacteria, which is currently one of global health problems [8]. Therefore, natural-derived compounds including polypeptide bacteriocins, phenolic compounds, and herbal EOs became the preference of bacterial controlling agents because of their safety perception and historical usage.

In recent years, a polypeptide bacteriocin, namely, nisin, is attractive as a new generation antibiotic [9]. Nisin produced by safe lactic acid bacteria species Lactococcus lactis effectively inhibits food-borne pathogens in both vegetatively growing cells and spores of Clostridium botulinum and Bacillus cereus [10, 11]. Additionally, this bacteriocin does not change the organoleptic properties of foods [12]. Nisin is therefore approved by the food and drug administration in over 48 countries and becomes widely used as a natural preservative in the various food industries [10]. Despite the fact that nisin is not considered as a common anticaries agent, reports of utilizing nisin to inhibit oral pathogens are still limited [11]. For examples, nisin has demonstrated a potential effect against various cariogenic bacteria including mutans and non-mutans streptococci, Lactobacillus sp., and Actinomyces sp. [13–15]. Sangcharoen et al.[16] reported that the antibacterial activity of nisin could be enhanced by weak organic acids such as ascorbic acid and citric acid.

GA is a phenolic acid commonly found in several plants [17, 18]. It possesses varieties of health-promoting benefits such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer, as well as antimicrobial effects [17, 18]. Previous reports showed that GA had strong antimicrobial activities with potentially replacing the synthetic antimicrobial agents for food and biomedical products. Besides, it was documented to have antibacterial potency against S. mutans [19, 20]. Therefore, GA becomes an interesting agent used to investigate the enhancement activity of nisin in this study. Apart from using a weak organic acid, the antibacterial efficacy of nisin could be intensified by the addition of plant EOs [21], which are recognized as antimicrobial agents in traditional medicine [22]. The well-known Thai culinary essential oils from finger root (Boesenbergia pandurate (Roxb.) Schltr.), kaffir lime (Citrus hystrix DC.), holy basil (Ocimum tenuiflorum L.), and lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf.) have been reported to contain antimicrobial properties in particular against medically important microorganisms [23–26]. However, research regarding the antibacterial synergism among these EOs and nisin against S. mutans is scarce. Therefore, the purpose of this study was primarily to determine the anti-S. mutans and antibiofilm activities of nisin, GA, and five Thai culinary EOs. The killing rate and the bacterial cellular morphology were also conducted to investigate the antibacterial characteristics and the possible mechanism, respectively. Moreover, the synergistic interactions among these compounds against S. mutans were studies based on a checkerboard microdilution assay to establish the FIC index.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Materials

Five EOs including finger root oil (FR, lot. 40017-2019), holy basil oil (HB, lot. 40024-2019), kaffir lime oil (KL, lot. 40020-2019), kaffir lime leaf oil (KLL, lot. 40011-2019), and lemongrass oil (LG, lot. 40003-2019) were kindly provided from Thai-China Flavors and Fragrances Industry Company, Limited. GA (98.8% purity) was purchased from EMD Millipore (Buchs, Switzerland). Chlorhexidine digluconate (20% w/v), nisin from L. lactis (1,030,000 IU/g), and saturated alkane standard (C7–C40) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA). Other chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade and obtained from local distributors.

2.2. Analytical Conditions for EOs

The constituents of five EOs were analyzed using a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS-6890n, Agilent, USA) equipped with HP-5 capillary column (30 m, 0.25 mm; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA). Helium was used as carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min. The oven temperature was initially 50°C for 3 min and then was increased to 200°C at a rate of 10°C/min for 3 min. Finally, the oven temperature was increased to 260°C at a rate of 15°C/min for 20 min. The injector temperature was 250°C. The sample was injected using a split ratio of 1:100. The retention indexes (RI) of constituents were determined with reference to a saturated alkane (C7–C40). Additionally, identification of component was evaluated by computer matching the fragmentation pattern with Wiley 7N spectral library.

2.3. Bacterial Strain and Culture Condition

S. mutans ATCC 25175 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. Three clinical S. mutans TLJ1-1, TLJ1-2, and TLJ1-3, which lacked collagen-binding adhesin encoded by the cnm gene [27], were kindly supported by Assoc. Prof. Dr. Jinthana Lapirattanakul, Department of Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. This project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mahidol University (MU-DT/PY-IRB2021/PY022). Bacterial strains were maintained in a mixture of brain heart infusion (BHI; Difco, USA) broth and 20% w/v glycerol at –80°C until use. For experiments, S. mutans was grown separately on BHI agar at 37°C for 48 h. The isolated bacterial colonies of actively growing cultures from agar plates were transferred to a test tube with BHI broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The turbidity of inoculum was adjusted spectrophotometrically at 600 nm to obtain an optical density (OD) of 0.2 (approximately 10⁶–10⁷ CFU/mL) before use in the experiments.

2.4. Antibacterial Susceptibility Test

The MICs of the test compounds were determined by a broth microdilution method [28]. The test compounds were prepared by dissolving in the BHI medium with Tween 80 (0.04% v/v) and absolute ethanol (0.03% v/v). Then, the serial twofold dilutions of test compounds were mixed with BHI broth at a 1:1 ratio (v/v) in 96-well sterile microtiter plates to obtain final concentrations of 0.006–0.80% v/v for EOs, 0.06–8.00 mg/mL for GA, 31.25–4,000 IU/mL for nisin, and 0.008–1.00 mg/mL for chlorhexidine. 20 μL of the prepared inoculum was added to BHI broth supplemented with the test compounds to obtain a 100 μL final volume in each well. The microtiter plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h under aerobic conditions. The negative and positive controls were set in each test. A negative control included the test sample but not the organism, and a positive control included the organism but not the test sample. Chlorhexidine was used as a reference control. The mixture of 0.04% v/v Tween 80 and 0.03% v/v absolute ethanol in BHI medium was also tested to control the effect of solvent. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration at which no bacterial growth was determined by the unaided eye. The growth endpoint in the wells containing test samples was observed by comparing with the growth in the control wells.

To establish the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), 20 μL of each culture medium was removed from wells with no visible growth and placed into 80 μL of sterile BHI broth in 96-well plates. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the MBC was determined as the lowest concentration that produced no bacterial growth observed by the unaided eye. Each sample was tested in triplicate in separate experiments.

The enhancing effects of EOs, GA, and chlorhexidine on the antibacterial activity of nisin were also evaluated by the broth microdilution method. The MIC and MBC values of nisin were determined in combination with 0.5×MIC of the test compounds (or 0.4% v/v of EOs when the MIC value of EOs was higher than 0.8% v/v).

2.5. Antibiofilm Formation Assay

The effect of test compounds on biofilm formation was determined as described by Wongsariya et al. [29] with modification. The prepared test compounds were mixed in BHI broth supplemented with 1% w/v sucrose by using twofold dilutions method to obtain the final concentrations of 0.006–0.80% v/v for each EO, 0.06–8.00 mg/mL for GA, 31.25–4,000 IU/mL for nisin, and 0.008–1.00 mg/mL for chlorhexidine. 20 μL of the prepared inoculum was added to each well. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, the medium was aspirated; the biofilm was then washed twice with 100 μL of sterile saline (0.9% w/v NaCl). The adherent biofilm was fixed with absolute ethanol (100 μL) for 15 min and stained with 0.1% w/v crystal violet for 15 min. After washing the samples with 200 μL of distilled water three times, the dye bound to the biofilm was solubilized by adding 100 μL dimethyl sulfoxide. The extracted dye was measured with a microtiter plate reader (Varioskan LUX, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at the absorbance of 590 nm.

The experiments were carried out in triplicate and the percentages of biofilm inhibition were calculated using

where was defined as the average absorbance of untreated cells, and was defined as the average absorbance of treated cells. The biofilm inhibition curves were constructed by plotting the percentage of inhibition against concentrations.

2.6. Time-Kill Assay

The bactericidal activities of the test compounds were determined according to the time-kill assay of Koo et al. [30] with modification. The bacterial suspension (240 μL, approximately 10⁶ CFU/mL) was added to BHI broth (960 μL) containing the test sample at 1, 2, and 4 × MICs. After incubation at 37°C, sample (20 μL) was collected at different time intervals (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h) and a tenfold serial dilution was prepared in sterile saline. Thereafter, 20 μL of each dilution was placed on a BHI agar plate and incubated at 37°C for 24–48 h. A bacterial viability count was performed and recorded as the number of CFU/mL. In each assay, a bacterial growth control was included and consisted of 0.04% v/v Tween 80 and 0.03% v/v absolute ethanol without the addition of test samples. Chlorhexidine was also used as the reference antiseptic agent. All experiments were carried out in triplicate and the experimental results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Time-kill curves were established by plotting log₁₀ CFU/mL against time. Bactericidal activity was defined as a ≥3 log₁₀-fold decrease in the number of survivors at each time point compared with the initial number inoculum.

2.7. SEM

The prepared inoculum of S. mutans ATCC 25175 was incubated with the test compounds at concentration of 4 × MIC. Bacterial growth controls were performed with the addition of 0.04% v/v Tween 80 and 0.03% v/v absolute ethanol without the test samples and the bacteria treated with chlorhexidine at a concentration of 4 × MIC were used as a reference compound. After incubation at 37°C for 12 h, bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. Then, samples were fixed in 2.5% w/v of glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.2) for overnight and post-fixed in 1% w/v osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution for 1–2 h. The cells were passed through a filter disc (pore size 1.2 micron) and dehydrated using serial concentrations of ethanol (30, 50, 70, 95, and 100% v/v). After critical point drying and coating with a gold sputter, samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope (JSM-IT500HR InTouchScope™, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

2.8. Checkerboard Microdilution Assay

The antibacterial synergism among test compounds, which could be determined the MIC values, was further studied by checkerboard microdilution assay as previously described by Botelho [31] with modification. 20 μL of the prepared inoculum of S. mutans was added to the mixed concentrations of two test compounds, which were in a range of 0.0625–4 × MIC. The experiments were performed in triplicate. The FIC index was defined as the lowest concentration of the combination of test compounds with no visible growth of the test organisms. FIC indexes for the double and triple combinations were calculated using formulas (2) and (3), respectively.

The FIC index values were interpreted as follows: FIC index ≤0.5; synergistic effect, 0.5 < FIC index <4.0; indifferent and FIC index >4.0; antagonistic effect.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

In the time-kill assay, the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 26.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, and significant differences between means were determined using Tukey’s honesty significant difference test or Dunnett’s T3 test at a significance level of .

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Constituents of EOs

The top ten compositions of five EOs analyzed by GC/MS system are reported in Table 1. Terpenes and terpenoids were the major constituent found in FR (Δ-3-careen, 24.4%), KL (L-limonene, 25.1%), and KLL (citronella, 73.3%) oils, whereas lactone (γ-dodecalactone, 33.1%) was mainly found in LG oils. A phenolic compound (3-allyl-6-methoxyphenol, 29.7%) was a major compound in HB oil.

Table 1: Top ten chemical constituents in five Thai culinary EOs.

EOs
Plants

Boesenbergia pandurate (Roxb.) Schltr.
Ocimum tenuiflorum L.
Citrus hystrix de Candolle
Cymbopogon (DC.) citratus Stapf.

Families plant parts
Zingiberaceae
Lamiaceae
Rutaceae
Gramineae

Rhizome
Leaf
Peel
Leaf
Leaf

No.
Compounds
RIa
RIb
Chemical composition (% of total)

1
α-Pinene
937
937
1.1

3.2

2
Camphene
967
979
7.1

3
Sabinene
976
976

3.0

4
β-Pinene
977
977

19.2
1.1

5
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one
988
988

1.5

6
β-Myrcene
992
992

5.1

7
α-Terpinene
1007
1007

5.1

8
Δ-3-Carene
1011
1052
24.4

9
Limonene
1020
1020

25.1

10
γ-Terpinene
1031
1028

6.1

11
1,8-Cineole
1036
1036
17.3

12
cis-Ocimene
1038
1040
4.8

13
Linalool oxide
1074
1034

1.6

14
α-Terpinolene
1079
1063

4.5

15
Linalool
1099
1101
2.4

3.9

16
α-Terpinolene
1100
1100

0.9

17
-(-) Isopulegol
1152
1152

2.0
2.6

18
Citronellal
1153
1160

73.3

19
Camphor
1154
1154
21.8

20
Neoisopulegol
1156
1164

2.1

21
Terpinen-4-ol
1165
1163

11.4

22
Borneol
1173
1173

0.8

23
α-Terpineol
1189
1186
1.0

10.5

24
Pulegone
1203
1193

1.3

25
β-Citronellol
1228
1230

4.3

26
(Z)-Citral
1248
1249

13.6

27
Geraniol
1255
1258
13.2

3.4

28
cis, trans-2-Ethylbicyclo [4.4.0] decane
1276
1936

1.4

29
Citral
1278
1278

15.1

30
Neral dimethyl acetal
1300.4
1334

22.7

31
Citronellyl acetate
1341
1341

5.6

32
3-Allyl-6-methoxyphenol
1365
1367

29.7

33
Methyl cinnamate
1379
1395
3.7

34
Geranyl acetate
1382
1384

1.3

35
β-Elemene
1391
1402

10.1

36
Methyl eugenol
1402
1411

23.2

37
trans-Caryophyllene
1419
1437

25.1

38
α-Humulene
1472
1470

1.4

39
Germacrene D
1482
1356

1.8

40
α-Selinene
1494
1522

1.3

41
β-Selinene
1500
1511

0.9

42
Caryophyllene oxide
1581
1673

0.8

43
γ-Dodecalactonec

1334

33.1

44
2-Fluoro-4-(4’-propyl [1,1’-bicyclohexyl] -4-yl) Benzonitrilec

2701

1.06

aRetention index documented in PubChem database or reported by Babushok et al. [32]. bRetention index relative to a saturated alkane on the HP-5 column. cTentative identification based on only mass fragmentation.

3.2. Antibacterial Susceptibility

Table 2 shows the MIC and MBC values of five EOs, GA, and nisin against S. mutans ATCC 25175 and three clinical isolates. It was found that LG oil demonstrated the highest potency among EOs with the lowest MIC value of 0.1% v/v, followed by KLL oil (0.8% v/v), whereas FR, HB, and KL oils showed the low potency with MIC and MBC values higher than 0.8% v/v. Therefore, only the effective EOs including KLL and LG were selected to investigate their activities against three clinical isolates. The results indicated the similar efficacy of LG against three clinical strains. KLL showed a higher susceptibility to the clinical strains as shown by the lower MIC and MBC values when compared with those against S. mutans ATCC 25175.

Table 2: Antibacterial activities of EOs, GA, and nisin against S. mutans ATCC 25175 and three clinical isolates.

Test compounds
S. mutans

ATCC 25175
TLJ1-1
TLJ1-2
TLJ1-3

MIC
MBC
MIC
MBC
MIC
MBC
MIC
MBC

EOs (% v/v)

FR
>0.8
>0.8

HB
>0.8
>0.8

KL
>0.8
>0.8

KLL
0.8
>0.8
0.1
0.2
0.8
>0.8
0.4
0.4

LG
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

GA (mg/mL)
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

Nisin (IU/mL)
>4,000
>4,000
>4,000
>4,000
>4,000
>4,000
2,000
8,000

Chlorhexidine (mg/mL)
0.0156
0.0156
0.0125
0.0125
0.0125
0.0125
0.005
0.005

Solventa
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE

aThe solvent was the mixture of 0.04% v/v Tween 80 and 0.03% v/v absolute ethanol in BHI. NE: no antibacterial effect.

For the phenolic compound, GA showed similar MIC and MBC values of 4 mg/mL against both standard and clinical isolates. As shown in Table 2, nisin failed to inhibit the growth of S. mutans ATCC 25175 and two clinical isolated at a concentration lower than 4,000 IU/mL, but nisin was able to inhibit one clinical isolate with the MIC and MBC values of 2,000 and 8,000 IU /mL, respectively. This result was inconsistent with the previous report that nisin illustrated the antibacterial activity against S. mutans UA 159 strain with MIC value in the range of 625–1250 IU/mL [15]. It could be noted that the different antibacterial efficacy of natural compounds could depend on the type of chemical compounds, the mechanism of action, and the strain of the test microorganism [33]. Therefore, the different bacterial strain could possibly explain this phenomenon.

For the reference agent, chlorhexidine demonstrated similar MIC and MBC values against all tested bacteria with a concentration lower than 0.0156 mg/mL. These results indicated similar or higher efficacy of all test compounds against the standard strain than those against the clinical isolates. Therefore, S. mutans ATCC 25175 was only used for further studies. The mixture of 0.04% v/v Tween 80 and 0.03% v/v absolute ethanol in BHI medium produced visible turbidity of bacterial growth similar to the positive control against all test strains. This result implied that Tween 80 and absolute ethanol at the tested concentrations had no inhibition effect on bacterial growth. In addition, this result was consistent with the negative control results of the time-kill assay and SEM study.

3.3. Antibiofilm Assay

The antibiofilm formation properties of the test compounds are demonstrated in Figure 1. The results showed that LG oil had the highest antibiofilm activity with greater than 86.44% inhibition when treating at the concentration range of 0.1–0.8% v/v. In the case of KLL oil, the biofilm formation of S. mutans was inhibited in a concentration-dependent pattern and showed the maximum inhibition of >73.32% after treatment at 0.8% v/v. This finding was similar to the study of Wongsariya et al. [29] where the antibiofilm formation efficacy of KLL oil was greater than 90% inhibition after treatment at the MIC.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 1: The inhibition effects of five EOs (a), nisin (b), GA (c), and chlorhexidine (d) on biofilm formation of S. mutans ATCC 25175.

On the other hand, although HB, FR, and KL oils could not determine the MIC in the concentration range of 0.006–0.8% v/v, these oils could inhibit the biofilm formation less than 50% in the same concentration range (Figure 1(a)). This result indicates that the biofilm suppression of EOs may not relate to their antibacterial activity. The composition of EOs was a complex mixture of compounds in different amounts; however, terpene represented the biggest composition along with other non-terpene compounds [34]. Similarly, the major terpene and terpenoid constituents of LG oils were neral dimethyl acetal, citral, and (Z)-citral about 51%, whereas KLL oil mainly consisted of citronella approximately 73% (Table 1). It has been documented that monoterpene-based oils were able to cause a loss of membrane integrity of biofilm cells; therefore the target sites for EOs seemed to be the cell membrane [35]. In addition, bacterial cells with damaged membranes often fail to attach and form biofilm structures [36]. Therefore, KLL and LG oils containing terpenes as a major constituent may be diminished the biofilm formation by these mechanisms [37]. As shown in Figures 1(b) and 1(c), nisin at all test concentrations could not inhibit the formation of biofilm of S. mutans, whereas GA at the concentration of 8 mg/mL interfered the formation of biofilms with 88.98% inhibition. Besides, chlorhexidine at a concentration of ≥0.0156 mg/mL could prevent the biofilm formation greater than 85.75% (Figure 1(d)).

3.4. The Enhancing Effects of EOs, GA, and Chlorhexidine on the Antibacterial Activity of Nisin

The enhancing activities of test compounds on the antibacterial activity of nisin are shown in Table 3. It was found that the addition of either KLL oil at 0.4% v/v or GA at 2 mg/mL led to a dramatic decrease in the MIC of nisin. The addition of KLL oil was able to reduce the MIC of nisin from >4,000 IU/mL to ⩽31.25 IU/mL (at least 125-fold), whereas the addition of GA showed the capacity to decrease the MIC of nisin to 500 IU/mL (at least 8-fold). Moreover, GA at the concentration of 2 mg/mL demonstrated the capacity to reduce the MBC of nisin by at least 4-fold. It is known that nisin is stable in an acidic medium [38], and GA is a weak acid with pKa values of 4.0 (carboxylic acid). Therefore, this synergistic antimicrobial activity against S. mutans could be explained by the decrease of the pH in solution resulting in the increasing solubility of nisin. In addition, it could be similar to ascorbic acid, which enhanced the antibacterial activity of nisin by binding on nisin molecule to stabilize its structure [16, 39]. However, the addition of other EOs and chlorhexidine at sub-MIC values of 0.4% v/v and 0.0078 mg/mL, respectively, demonstrated no enhancing effects on the antibacterial activity of nisin. These results imply that the intensifying ability of EOs and chlorhexidine on the antibacterial activity of nisin against S. mutans may not be associated only with their antibacterial activity. Although KLL oil showed a higher ability to reduce the MIC value of nisin greater than GA, only GA displayed the capacity to decrease the MBC value of nisin. Therefore, the combination of nisin and GA was selected to further determine the killing rate and to observe the morphological change.

Table 3: The enhancing effects of five EOs, GA, and chlorhexidine on the anti-S. mutans activity of nisin

Nisin
Combined with

FR
HB
KL
KLL
LG
GA
Chlorhexidine

0.4% v/v
0.4% v/v
0.4% v/v
0.4% v/v
0.05% v/v
2 mg/mL
0.0078 mg/mL

MIC (IU/mL)
>4,000
>4,000
>4,000
>4,000
⩽31.25
>4,000
500
>4,000

MBC (IU/mL)
>4,000
>4,000
>4,000
>4,000
>4,000
>4,000
1,000
>4,000

3.5. Time-Kill Assay

The bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of the test compounds against S. mutans are shown in Figure 2. The ability of KLL oil to kill S. mutans was in a time-dependent manner. Treatment with KLL oil at concentrations of 1, 2, and 4×MICs could reduce the number of survival bacteria greater than 3 log₁₀ CFU/mL within 12 h and induced complete bacterial cell death within 24 h (Figure 2(a)). The bactericidal activity of LG oil against S. mutans was in concentration- and time-dependent pattern. Treatment with LG oil at the concentrations of 2 and 4×MICs exerted the most bactericidal activity (≥3 log₁₀-fold decreases) within 24 h, but LG at the concentration of MIC only suppressed the number of survival S. mutans constantly for 24 h (Figure 2(b)). Although GA showed the bacteriostatic effect at a concentration of 4×MIC by preventing bacterial growth for 24 h, it failed to inhibit the cell growth at either concentration of 1 or 2×MIC (Figure 2(c)). This result was in agreement with the study of Kang et al. [40] where GA was able to prevent the growth of periodontal bacteria in a bacteriostatic characteristic.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2: Time-kill curves of S. mutans ATCC 25175 after treatment with KLL oil (a), LG oil (b), GA (c), chlorhexidine (d), and the combination of nisin and GA (e). Each symbol indicates the mean ± SD of triplicate samples.

Because the samples at each time point were diluted with normal saline and transferred to a new BHI agar plate, the survival of adaptive isolates may occur from a dynamic manner of the time-kill assay [41, 42]. Therefore, the MIC and MBC values obtained from a static view of broth microdilution assay may not agree with the time-kill assay for a bacteriostatic agent [28]. In the case of chlorhexidine, a bactericidal effect with ≥3 log₁₀-fold reductions was observed after treatment at 4×MIC for 24 h, whereas a bacteriostatic effect with <2 log₁₀-fold reductions was detected after treatment at either 1 or 2×MIC (Figure 2(d)).

Despite the fact that the ability of plant-derived compounds to potentiate an antibacterial property of bacteriocin has been reported in particular against food-borne pathogens including Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella sp. [43], the antibacterial synergism of GA and nisin against oral pathogen was studied using time-kill assay as shown in Figure 2(e). Treatment with the combination of GA and nisin at sub-MIC value was able to suppress the bacterial growth for 24 h, whereas treatment with either GA or nisin alone failed to inhibit bacterial growth. This result indicated that GA could intensify the antibacterial activity of nisin in a bacteriostatic manner.

3.6. SEM

SEM images of S. mutans ATCC 25175 are shown in Figure 3. The SEM images revealed that KLL and LG oils at a concentration of 4×MIC induced alteration in cell morphology. Control cells in the presence of 0.04% v/v Tween 80 and 0.03% v/v absolute ethanol showed an oval shape with a smooth cell surface (Figure 3(a)). In contrast, cells treated with either KLL oil or LG oil at 4×MIC displayed irregular oval shape with a concavity on the cell surface (Figures 3(b) and 3(c), arrows). In accordance with the previous study of Guimarães et al. [44], Escherichia coli treated with citronellol demonstrated irregular cell size with the rough surface. Therefore, the anti-S. mutans activities of KLL and LG oils could be principally attributed by terpene constituents along with the contribution of other compounds.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

Figure 3: Scanning electron micrographs of S. mutans ATCC 25175 at 12 h after treatment with control solvent (0.04% v/v Tween 80 and 0.03% v/v absolute ethanol (a), KLL oil at 4×MIC (b), LG oil at 4×MIC (c), GA at 4×MIC (d), chlorhexidine at 4×MIC (e), nisin at 1,000 IU/mL (f), GA at 0.5×MIC (g), and the combination of nisin at 1,000 IU/mL and GA at 0.5×MIC (h).

Additionally, the treatment of GA at 4×MIC caused the unseparated spherical cells with coating materials (Figure 3(d), arrows). Apart from lowering environmental pH, GA could also act as a sequestering agent of divalent ions and consequently caused a disruptive effect on the cell membrane [45]. This explanation supports the morphological results of SEM. Similar results could be observed after treating S. mutans cells with Galla chinensis extracts, which are rich in GA content [46]. The bacterial cells also displayed irregular cell wall structure and showed fewer cells in the chain [46]. In addition, the antibacterial mechanism of GA was suggested to interfere biofilm composition and structure, inhibit glucosyltransferase activity, and directly suppress bacteria growth [18, 47, 48]. When S. mutans was treated with chlorhexidine, perforation on the cell surface was observed (Figure 3(e), arrows).

As shown in Figures 3(f) and 3(g), cells treated with nisin (1,000 IU) or GA (0.5×MIC) alone showed similar shape and cell membrane to the control, which was consistent with the results from the time-kill assay. Although nisin was known to play an important role in pore-forming on bacterial membrane [49], the damaged cell membrane could not be observed after treatment with nisin at 1,000 IU. However, after treatment with the combination of nisin and GA, cells showed a small unseparated oval shape with the presence of cellular matrix (Figure 3(h)). The enhanced effect of GA on the antibacterial activity of nisin may be similar to the synergistic effect of citric acid that the combination of nisin and citric acid could control the growth of S. aureus and L. monocytogenes by inducing the release of cytoplasmic constituents including ions, DNA, and RNA [50].

3.7. Checkerboard Microdilution Assay

The interaction among the test compounds was primarily studied using the checkerboard assay. In addition to lowering MIC of nisin, KLL oil together with LG oil, GA, and chlorhexidine demonstrated the synergistic effect against S. mutans with the FIC indexes lower than 0.37 as shown in Table 4. However, the additive interaction was found in the triple combination of KLL oil, LG oil, and chlorhexidine. This result was not surprising because LG combined with chlorhexidine showed an indifferent effect with the FIC index of 0.56. Although GA could decrease the MIC of nisin against S. mutans, the combination of GA with LG oil or chlorhexidine showed the indifferent effect with the FIC indexes greater than 2. However, no antagonistic effect was observed among these compounds. Because EOs are plant-based products containing a complex mixture of substances, the interaction within each constituent could lead to additive, synergistic, and antagonistic effects [22]. Therefore, the mode of action associated with each constituent should be further investigated.

Table 4: FIC indexes of the combination of chlorhexidine, GA, and EOs against S. mutans ATCC 25175.

Compounds
MIC
Combined compounds
MIC
FIC index

Alone
Combined
Alone
Combined

KLL (% v/v)
0.8
0.1
LG (% v/v)
0.1
0.025
0.37
SYN∗

0.8
0.1
GA (mg/mL)
4
0.5
0.25
SYN∗

0.8
0.2
Chlorhexidine (mg/mL)
0.0156
0.0019
0.37
SYN∗

0.8
0.05
LG (% v/v)+
0.1
0.025
0.56
IND∗

Chlorhexidine (mg/mL)
0.0159
0.0039

LG (% v/v)
0.1
0.1
GA (mg/mL)
4
4
2.00
IND∗

0.1
0.025
Chlorhexidine (mg/mL)
0.0156
0.0039
0.56
IND∗

GA (mg/mL)
4
8
Chlorhexidine (mg/mL)
0.0156
0.0019
2.12
IND∗

∗IND: indifferent effect; SYN: synergistic effect.

4. Conclusions

GA and two Thai culinary EOs including KLL and LG oils exhibited potent inhibitory effects against S. mutans and biofilm formation. The damage to cell membranes resulting in an alteration in bacterial cell morphology was the possible mechanism of action. Despite a weak antibacterial activity of nisin against S. mutans, the addition of GA displayed markedly capacity to enhance the anti-S. mutans activity of nisin with the bacteriostatic character by 8-fold decrease in MIC values. Additionally, KLL oil combined with LG oil, GA, and chlorhexidine revealed the synergistic antibacterial interaction. Therefore, these results may prove valuable information that GA, and KLL could be potentially utilized as an adjunctive therapy with nisin or chlorhexidine for overcoming S. mutans-associated infection.

Data Availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings in this study are provided in the results and discussion section within the article. The datasets used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Thai-China Flavors and Fragrances Industry Company Limited is gratefully acknowledged for supporting five EOs. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Jinthana Lapirattanakul, Department of Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, is sincerely acknowledged for providing three clinical isolates. This research was funded by King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang Research Fund (grant no. 2562-0216001).

References

J. Abranches, J. H. Miller, A. R. Martinez, P. J. Simpson-Haidaris, R. A. Burne, and J. A. Lemos, “The collagen-binding protein Cnm is required for Streptococcus mutans adherence to and intracellular invasion of human coronary artery endothelial cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 2277–2284, 2011.

N. B. Pitts, D. T. Zero, P. D. Marsh et al., “Dental caries,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2017.

B. T. Rosier, P. D. Marsh, and A. Mira, “Resilience of the oral microbiota in health: mechanisms that prevent dysbiosis,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 371–380, 2018.

A. M. Scharnow, A. E. Solinski, and W. M. Wuest, “Targeting S. mutans biofilms: a perspective on preventing dental caries,” Medchemcomm, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1057–1067, 2019.

S. D. Forssten, M. Björklund, and A. C. Ouwehand, “Streptococcus mutans, caries and simulation models,” Nutrients, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 290–298, 2010.

J. A. Banas and D. R. Drake, “Are the mutans streptococci still considered relevant to understanding the microbial etiology of dental caries?” BMC Oral Health, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 129, 2018.

Y. Sakaue, S. Takenaka, T. Ohsumi, H. Domon, Y. Terao, and Y. Noiri, “The effect of chlorhexidine on dental calculus formation: an in vitro study,” BMC Oral Health, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 52, 2018.

M.-J. Lee and M.-K. Kang, “Analysis of the antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and antioxidant activities of Cnidium officinale extracts,” Plants, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 988, 2020.

M.-D. Seo, H.-S. Won, J.-H. Kim, T. Mishig-Ochir, and B.-J. Lee, “Antimicrobial peptides for therapeutic applications: a review,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 12276–12286, 2012.

L. O’sullivan, R. Ross, and C. Hill, “Potential of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria for improvements in food safety and quality,” Biochimie, vol. 84, no. 5-6, pp. 593–604, 2002.

Z. Tong, L. Ni, and J. Ling, “Antibacterial peptide nisin: a potential role in the inhibition of oral pathogenic bacteria,” Peptides, vol. 60, pp. 32–40, 2014.

N. P. Guerra, A. T. Agrasar, C. L. Macías, P. F. Bernárdez, and L. P. Castro, “Dynamic mathematical models to describe the growth and nisin production by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis CECT 539 in both batch and re-alkalized fed-batch cultures,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 103–113, 2007.

S. Mai, M. T. Mauger, L.-N. Niu et al., “Potential applications of antimicrobial peptides and their mimics in combating caries and pulpal infections,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 49, pp. 16–35, 2017.

J. M. Shin, I. Ateia, J. R. Paulus et al., “Antimicrobial nisin acts against saliva derived multi-species biofilms without cytotoxicity to human oral cells,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 6, p. 617, 2015.

Z. Tong, L. Dong, L. Zhou, R. Tao, and L. Ni, “Nisin inhibits dental caries-associated microorganism in vitro,” Peptides, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2003–2008, 2010.

N. Sangcharoen, W. Klaypradit, and P. Wilaipun, “Antimicrobial activity optimization of nisin, ascorbic acid and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA) against Salmonella enteritidis ATCC 13076 using response surface methodology,” Agriculture and Natural Resources, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 355–364, 2017.

C. Manach, A. Scalbert, C. Morand, C. Rémésy, and L. Jiménez, “Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 727–747, 2004.

G. Ferrazzano, I. Amato, A. Ingenito, A. Zarrelli, G. Pinto, and A. Pollio, “Plant polyphenols and their anti-cariogenic properties: a review,” Molecules, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1486–1507, 2011.

D. Shao, J. Li, J. Li et al., “Inhibition of gallic acid on the growth and biofilm formation ofEscherichia coliandStreptococcus mutans,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. M1299–M1305, 2015.

A. Borges, M. J. Saavedra, and M. Simões, “The activity of ferulic and gallic acids in biofilm prevention and control of pathogenic bacteria,” Biofouling, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 755–767, 2012.

N. Solomakos, A. Govaris, P. Koidis, and N. Botsoglou, “The antimicrobial effect of thyme essential oil, nisin, and their combination against Listeria monocytogenes in minced beef during refrigerated storage,” Food Microbiology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 120–127, 2008.

I. H. N. Bassolé and H. R. Juliani, “Essential oils in combination and their antimicrobial properties,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 3989–4006, 2012.

R. Kalaivani, V. J. Devi, R. Umarani, K. Periyanayagam, and A. K. Kumaraguru, “Antimicrobial activity of some important medicinal plant oils against human pathogens,” Journal of Biologically Active Products from Nature, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 30–37, 2012.

A. Sreepian, P. M. Sreepian, C. Chanthong, T. Mingkhwancheep, and P. Prathit, “Antibacterial activity of essential oil extracted from Citrus hystrix (Kaffir Lime) peels: an in vitro study,” Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 531–541, 2019.

M. I. Naik, B. A. Fomda, E. Jaykumar, and J. A. Bhat, “Antibacterial activity of lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) oil against some selected pathogenic bacterias,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 535–538, 2010.

M. Mahboubi, “Zingiber officinale Rosc. essential oil, a review on its composition and bioactivity,” Clinical Phytoscience, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019.

J. Lapirattanakul, K. Nakano, R. Nomura et al., “Multilocus sequence typing analysis of Streptococcus mutans strains with the cnm gene encoding collagen-binding adhesin,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 1677–1684, 2011.

P. Jiamboonsri, P. Pithayanukul, R. Bavovada, and M. T. Chomnawang, “The inhibitory potential of Thai mango seed kernel extract against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Molecules, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 6255–6270, 2011.

K. Wongsariya, P. Phanthong, N. Bunyapraphatsara, V. Srisukh, and M. T. Chomnawang, “Synergistic interaction and mode of action ofCitrus hystrixessential oil against bacteria causing periodontal diseases,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 273–280, 2014.

H. Koo, P. L. Rosalen, J. A. Cury, Y. K. Park, and W. H. Bowen, “Effects of compounds found in propolis on Streptococcus mutans growth and on glucosyltransferase activity,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1302–1309, 2002.

M. G. Botelho, “Fractional inhibitory concentration index of combinations of antibacterial agents against cariogenic organisms,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 565–570, 2000.

V. Babushok, P. Linstrom, and I. Zenkevich, “Retention indices for frequently reported compounds of plant essential oils,” Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 40, no. 4, Article ID 043101, 2011.

H. J. D. Dorman and S. G. Deans, “Antimicrobial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 308–316, 2000.

S. Kumari, S. Pundhir, P. Priya et al., “EssOilDB: a database of essential oils reflecting terpene composition and variability in the plant kingdom,” Database, vol. 2014, 2014.

M. T. Ngome, J. G. L. F. Alves, A. C. F. De Oliveira, P. Da Silva Machado, O. L. Mondragón-Bernal, and R. H. Piccoli, “Linalool, citral, eugenol and thymol: control of planktonic and sessile cells of Shigella flexneri,” AMB Express, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018.

G. Mogosanu, A. Grumezescu, K.-S. Huang, L. Bejenaru, and C. Bejenaru, “Prevention of microbial communities: novel approaches based natural products,” Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 94–111, 2015.

M. A. Olszewska, A. Gędas, and M. Simões, “The effects of eugenol, trans-cinnamaldehyde, citronellol, and terpineol on Escherichia coli biofilm control as assessed by culture-dependent and -independent methods,” Molecules, vol. 25, no. 11, p. 2641, 2020.

W. Liu and J. N. Hansen, “Some chemical and physical properties of nisin, a small-protein antibiotic produced by Lactococcus lactis,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 2551–2558, 1990.

M. D. Adhikari, G. Das, and A. Ramesh, “Retention of nisin activity at elevated pH in an organic acid complex and gold nanoparticle composite,” Chemical Communications, vol. 48, no. 71, pp. 8928–8930, 2012.

M.-S. Kang, J.-S. Oh, I.-C. Kang, S.-J. Hong, and C.-H. Choi, “Inhibitory effect of methyl gallate and gallic acid on oral bacteria,” The Journal of Microbiology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 744–750, 2008.

P. Verma, Methods for Determining Bactericidal Activity and Antimicrobial Interactions: Synergy Testing, Time-Kill Curves, and Population Analysis, CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 2007.

C. Gadhi, R. Hatier, F. Mory et al., “Bactericidal properties of the chloroform fraction from rhizomes of Aristolochia paucinervis Pomel,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 75, no. 2-3, pp. 207–212, 2001.

H. Mathur, D. Field, M. C. Rea, P. D. Cotter, C. Hill, and R. P. Ross, “Bacteriocin-antimicrobial synergy: a medical and food perspective,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, p. 1205, 2017.

A. C. Guimarães, L. M. Meireles, M. F. Lemos et al., “Antibacterial activity of terpenes and terpenoids present in essential oils,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 13, p. 2471, 2019.

Q. Wang, E. F. de Oliveira, S. Alborzi, L. J. Bastarrachea, and R. V. Tikekar, “On mechanism behind UV-A light enhanced antibacterial activity of gallic acid and propyl gallate against Escherichia coli O157: H7,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2017.

E.-J. Kim and B.-H. Jin, “Galla chinensisextracts and calcium induce remineralization and antibacterial effects of enamel in aStreptococcus mutansbiofilm model,” Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 90–96, 2018.

M. Liu, X. Wu, J. Li et al., “The specific anti-biofilm effect of gallic acid on Staphylococcus aureus by regulating the expression of the ica operon,” Food Control, vol. 73, pp. 613–618, 2017.

K. Li, G. Guan, J. Zhu, H. Wu, and Q. Sun, “Antibacterial activity and mechanism of a laccase-catalyzed chitosan-gallic acid derivative against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus,” Food Control, vol. 96, pp. 234–243, 2019.

S.-T. D. Hsu, E. Breukink, E. Tischenko et al., “The nisin-lipid II complex reveals a pyrophosphate cage that provides a blueprint for novel antibiotics,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 963–967, 2004.

X. Zhao, Z. Zhen, X. Wang, and N. Guo, “Synergy of a combination of nisin and citric acid against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes,” Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2058–2068, 2017.