Biosorption of Congo Red Dye from Aqueous Solution Using Adsorbent Prepared from Vangueria infausta Fruit Pericarp

The adsorption efficiency of acid-treated Vangueria infausta fruit pericarp (VIFP) biosorbent to uptake Congo red (CR) dye was investigated through batch experiments. Optimum conditions for the adsorption process were determined by varying the solution pH, biosorbent dosage, contact time, initial concentration of CR dye, and temperature. Results revealed that the data fits well with the Langmuir isotherm model, demonstrating the monolayer coverage of the CR dye molecule on the surface of the VIFP biosorbent. The higher value of correlation coefficient, R 2 for pseudo-second-order (0.9997) compared to R 2 of pseudo-first-order (0.9605) suggests that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model is an ideal fit in describing the kinetics of CR dye adsorption by VIFP biosorbent. The positive value of Δ H ° (41.42 kJ/mol) and Δ S ° (158.32 J/mol.K) depicts the endothermic nature and spontaneity of the biosorption of CR dye by VIFP. The values of Δ G ° obtained were negative, showing that the adsorption is thermodynamically favourable. Therefore, the acid-treated adsorbent from Vangueria infausta can efficiently be used in the removal of CR dye from aqueous solution.


Introduction
Globally, water pollution by organic dyes is increasingly becoming a serious environmental issue.Dyes are stable, soluble organic compounds extensively employed in the paper, textile, pharmaceutical, and leather industries [1].Worldwide, 700,000 tons of dyes and 100 tons of dye waste are produced and discharged into water bodies, respectively [2].In particular, azo dyes make up 70% of all synthetic dyes used in textile, printing, and paper manufacturing industries [3].
Congo red (CR, C 32 H 22 N 6 Na 2 O 6 S 2 ) has two azo groups (-N=N-); thus, it is an excellent model among the synthetic dyes (Figure 1(a)).In a pH range of 5-10, it appears red and has a complex structure with high molecular weight.Owing to its structural complexity and stability, this ionic diazo dye is difficult to biodegrade, accounting for its persistence in the environment.Like other azo dyes, CR metabolizes benzidine, which is carcinogenic and toxic [4].Although most countries have banned CR dye, it is still employed as a pH indicator, in diagnostic medicine and fields such as microbiol-ogy for staining.Extensive use of CR dyes has led to their massive discharge through the soil and wastewater systems.As a result, there is a severe problem with the availability of safe drinking water [5].
Furthermore, suppose the discharged CR dyes are not adequately treated.In that case, they will spend a significant amount of time in the environment, posing a threat to the survival of both terrestrial and aquatic organisms.Therefore, it is of economic and environmental importance to search for effective methods to remove these azo dyes before discharging them into the aquatic environment.
To date, azo dyes have been removed from wastewater using a variety of chemical, biological, and physical approaches [6].However, although chemical methods can remove dye contaminants swiftly and efficiently, their high costs make them unfavourable for current commercial use.Likewise, besides the simplicity and ecofriendliness of the biological methods, their setup involves bioreactors which demand large space, and their operation proceeds by generating excess sludge [7].In addition, most azo dyes' structural complexity and stability, including CR dye, present high resistance to chemical and biological methods, making their removal from water challenging [8].
Compared to other conventional methods, adsorption is preferred for dye removal due to its inexpensiveness, adsorbent versatility, simplicity, less sludge production, and high efficiency [9].Various adsorbents such as chitosan, zeolites, clays, polymeric resins, and activated carbon materials have been reportedly employed for dye removal from aqueous solutions.However, their application is constrained by their ineffectiveness at low adsorbate concentration, costly operating process, poor selectivity, and the problem of unsuccessful removal of the colouration from wastewater [10][11][12][13][14]. On the other hand, nanoparticles are emerging as potential adsorbents for water remediation.Still, because of their small size, their separation and recovery from contaminated water pose significant challenges for water treatment.Also, with increasingly widespread applications of nanoparticles in water remediation, there are growing concerns about their potential toxicity to the environment and human health.It is evident from the literature that several nanomaterials may have adverse effects on the environment and human health [15][16][17].
Similarly, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have also attracted colossal research interest in water decontamination.Still, their applications are hampered by their lack of durability and limited availability of raw materials for MOF production [18].To circumvent these problems, researchers have devoted enormous effort to preparing and using biosorbents because they are readily accessible and can easily be regenerated for further use.Munagapati et al., for example, evaluated the efficacy of modified banana peels to remove reactive black 5 dye from aqueous solutions, achieving a maximum adsorption capacity of 211.8 mg/g [19].Latif et al. demonstrated the removal of fluorescein and eosin dyes from wastewater by utilizing Citrullus lanatus, achieving removal efficiencies of 48.06-88.08% and 48.47-79.31%,respectively [20].Aminated sunflower seed hulls have also been studied to remove reactive blue 5 and reactive yellow 84 with a maximum uptake of 51.02 mg/g and 63.27 mg/g, respectively [21].
So far, no studies on using Vangueria infausta fruit pericarp for the remediation of wastewater contaminated by CR dyes have been reported.Vangueria infausta plants grow wildly in most African societies.Trees (Figure 1(b)) bear fruits (Figure 1(c)), which are consumed by humans as well as animals.The extracts from root bark have been reported to exhibit antimalarial activity, while the leaves and stem barks have also been proven to be a remedy for various ailments [22].The fruit pericarp is a lignocellulosic material constituting natural polymers composed of hemicelluloses, cellulose, lignin, and tannins with hydroxyl groups in each molecule [23][24][25].These materials are endowed with functionalities which show promising potential for the adsorption of environmental pollutants, including heavy metals and organic dyes.It is known that the juice industry discards a large amount of waste pericarps and, if left in the environment without proper treatment, would decompose and pollute the environment, eventually threatening public health.Preparing adsorbents from Vangueria infausta fruit pericarp (VIFP) is anticipated to solve two ecological problems: pericarp waste recycling and azo dye removal from wastewater.Therefore, this study reports the remediation of Congo red dye using an adsorbent prepared from Vangueria infausta fruit pericarp (VIFP).    .HNO 3 was used to activate the biosorbent while HCl and NaOH were utilized for pH regulation.

Materials and Methods
2.2.Biosorbent Preparation.The ripe fruits were collected from Vangueria infausta trees and dried under a shed for one month.After drying, the fruit pericarps were isolated from the seeds and pulp and rinsed using deionized water.Moisture was removed by oven drying at 353 K to a constant mass.The dried pericarps were then crushed and pulverized into a fine powder and sieved to attain particle sizes ≤ 300 μm.36 g of the powder was soaked in 500 mL of 0.1 M HNO 3 at 323 K for 24 h to expose the binding sites of the biosorbent.
The mixture was then filtered using the Whatman filter paper of 0.45 microns, and the acid content in the residue was removed by washing the powder thoroughly with deionized water.Finally, the filtered biomass was oven dried at 378 K for two hours until a constant mass of 35.160 g was recorded and sealed in air-tight glass bottles to prevent it from moisture [26].

Physicochemical
Characterisation of the Biosorbent.The physical characteristics of the biosorbent, including specific surface area, pore size, and total pore volume, were calculated by the BET method using Quanta Chrome NOVA 1200e surface area and a pore size analyser.All samples were degassed under vacuum at 573 K for six hours and a pressure of 0.1 millitorrs to remove volatiles.Pure liquid nitrogen at 77.35 K was used to determine the specific surface area of the biosorbent through physical adsorption.Surface characteristics were elucidated by JEOL JSM-7500F field emission scanning microscope (FESEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL 1400 TEM, whereby the images were acquired digitally with a Megaview III camera and recorded and measured with the iTEM software of the soft imaging system.Elucidation of biosorbent functional groups before and after acid activation was done using Bruker Optics ALPHA-E FT-IR spectrometer at an absorption range of 4000-400 cm -1 .The crystalline structure of the biosorbent was studied by employing a Bruker AXS D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer.The analysis was done under a CuKα monochromatic beam (wavelength of 0.154 nm) produced at 40 KV and 30 mA.  10,20,30,40,50,60,70, and 80 mg/L was contacted with 0.7 g of VIFP biosorbent.The mixture was agitated at 200 rpm at a pH of 2 for 180 min.The mixture was centrifuged, and analysis of the supernatant for the remaining dye was done using a UV-visible spectrophotometer.
2.6.5.Effect of Temperature.To determine how the temperature affects the adsorption process, batch experiments were conducted at 298, 303, 308, 313, 318, 323, 328, and 333 K at pH of 2, initial dye concentration of 10 mg/L, and 0.7 g VIFP biosorbent and agitated at 200 rpm for 180 min.The mixtures were centrifuged, and the supernatant was analysed for the remaining dye by UV-Vis spectrophotometer.
In this series of batch adsorption studies, the supernatant was analysed for the remaining CR dye concentration using a UV-visible spectrophotometer at a wavelength of maximum absorption of 499 nm for pH 5-10 and 564 nm for pH 2-4.All measurements were done in triplicate, and the mean values were provided along with an error estimate of standard deviation.The adsorption efficiency and capacity (q e ) were determined using where C i is the initial CR dye concentration (mg/L), C e is the CR dye concentration at equilibrium (mg/L), q e is the amount of CR adsorbed (mg/g), V is the volume of CR dye (L), and m is the mass of the VIFP adsorbent (g).
2.6.6.Adsorption at Optimum Conditions.This procedure was carried out at all optimum conditions of pH 2, 0.7 g VIFP dosage, 180 min contact time, initial CR dye concentration of 10 mg/L at 328 K, and agitation of 200 rpm.Briefly, 50 mL of CR dye (10 mg/L) was measured and placed in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, followed by the addition of 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH for pH adjustment to 2. The solution was then contacted with 0.7 g of VIFP biosorbent for 180 min at 328 K, and the flasks were shaken at 200 rpm in an incubator shaker.After 180 min elapsed, the mixture was centrifuged and analysed for the remaining dye concentration by using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer.This procedure was carried out in triplicate.

Adsorption Isotherms.
To elucidate the interaction between CR dye and VIFP adsorbent concerning the surface characteristics of the biosorbent and its affinity towards the adsorbate, this study employed the most common Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models.
2.7.1.Freundlich Isotherm Model.The Freundlich isotherm assumes the presence of unlimited sorption sites on the adsorbent, suggesting an adsorption process which involves multilayer coverage of the adsorbate onto the surface of the adsorbent.It also explains the adsorbent's surface heteroge-neity and the availability of binding sites having different activation energies.This isotherm model can explain the adsorption capacity and intensity of the adsorption process through where q e is the amount of adsorbate adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent (mg/g), C e is the equilibrium adsorbate concentration in solution (mg/L), and K F and 1/n are the Freundlich constants representing the adsorption capacity (L/mg) and adsorption intensity, respectively.A plot of log q e against C e shows that the parameters K F and n can be determined from the y-intercept and slope, respectively.Obtaining a smaller value of 1/n depicts better adsorption and stronger binding between the adsorbate and the surface of the adsorbent.The favourability of the adsorption can be inferred by values of n, whereby n values between 1 and 10 indicate favourable adsorption [27].
2.7.2. Langmuir Isotherm Model.The Langmuir isotherm assumes monolayer adsorption onto the adsorbent's site.This model suggests a dynamic equilibrium of the adsorptiondesorption process.It explains further that the surface of the adsorbent is homogenous with binding sites of equivalent activation energy.This model can be explained through C e and C o represent the equilibrium and initial concentration of the adsorbate (mg/L), respectively, and q e is the amount of adsorbate adsorbed (mg/g).Moreover, the Langmuir constant K L entails the adsorption capacity (mg/g), while q m is the maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g), and q e represents the equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg/g).The q m and K L can be obtained by a linear plot of 1/C e against 1/q e .The separation factor RL can be obtained in this model using Equation ( 4).The adsorption process is unfavourable when R L is greater than 1, linear when R L = 1, and irreversible when R L = 0.For a favourable adsorption process, the value of R L must be greater than 0 but less than 1 [28].
2.8.Adsorption Kinetic Models.The adsorption kinetic model provides insights into the mechanism of the adsorption process.The pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intraparticle diffusion models were applied to describe the mechanism of CR dye adsorption onto VIFP adsorbent.
2.8.1.Pseudo-First-Order Kinetic Model.Equations ( 5) and ( 6) were used to fit the experimental data with a pseudofirst-order model: where q t is the amount of adsorbate adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbent at time t (mg/g), k 1 is the pseudo-first-order rate constant (per min), and t is the contact time (min).A plot of log ðq e − q t Þ against t determines the pseudo-firstorder rate constant from the slope [29].
2.8.2.Pseudo-Second-Order.In pseudo-second-order adsorption, the rate-limiting step is chemisorptions which govern the nature of the adsorption.Pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics can best be described by where k 2 and q e are the pseudo-second-order rate constant (g/ mg/min) and equilibrium adsorption capacity, respectively; these parameters are determined from a linear plot of t/q t against time (min) [29,30].

Intraparticle Diffusion Model.
The intraparticle diffusion model is represented by Equation ( 9), and the values of the constants can be obtained from the plot of q t vs ðtÞ 1/2 .In the equation, t is time (min), and k int is the rate constant for intraparticle diffusion (mg/g min −0:5 ).
2.10.Desorption Studies.Desorption studies were crucial to ensure the reusability of the VIFP biosorbent, which in turn leads to the minimization of cost.For desorption experiments, the VIFP biosorbent that was used for the adsorption of 10 mg/L of the CR dye solution was centrifuged to separate the solution from the loaded biosorbent.The mixture was filtered by the Whatman filter paper, and the residue was washed with deionized water to remove traces of unadsorbed dye molecules.The biosorbent was then agitated with 50 mL deionized water while regulating pH at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 as before by using 0.1 M NaOH or HCl.The desorbed CR dye was determined using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer as the amount of dye remaining in the solution.The initial concentration of the adsorbed CR dye was 9.23 mg/L.

Results and Discussion
3.1.Characteristics of VIFP Biosorbent 3.1.1.XRD Analysis.The crystal structure of the VIFP biosorbent was examined by X-ray diffraction (Figure 2).For both untreated and acid-treated VIFP biosorbents, the typical XRD patterns show two broad peaks at 2θ = 15.6 °and 2θ = 21.7 °.While the weak peak at 2θ = 15.6 °was assigned to lignin and hemicelluloses [32], the strong peaks at 2θ = 21.7 °are characteristic of cellulose as the dominant material in VIFP biosorbent [33].The treatment of VIFP biosorbent with HNO 3 caused slight changes in the cellulose structure, manifested by the presence of more intense peaks in the acid-treated VIFP biosorbent than in the pristine material.This modification could contribute to more exposure of the functional groups, which play a vital role in the adsorption of environmental pollutants.Generally, structural analysis indicates that both crystalline and amorphous forms coexist in the VIFP material, characteristic of cellulose crystallinity [34].
3.1.2.BET Analysis.The specific surface area of the untreated and acid-treated VIFP biosorbent was determined by the BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) method.The acid-treated VIFP biosorbent (1063.6791m 2 /g) had a much greater specific surface area (three times) than the untreated VIFP biosorbent (358.0724m 2 /g), as shown in Table 1.This implies the suitability of the treated VIFP biosorbent in accommodating more dye molecules on its surface than the untreated VIFP biosorbent.Likewise, the pore sizes of 15.2265 Å and 15.2773 Å were obtained for untreated and acid-treated VIFP samples, respectively.The pore volumes of untreated and acid-treated VIPF samples were estimated to be 1.4246 cm 3 /g and 1.6837 cm 3 /g, respectively.This enhancement of porosity characteristics of the VIFP material after treatment with 0.1 M HNO 3 is a good indicator of good performance towards the adsorption of dyes.Additionally, supplementary information Figure S1 shows type V isotherms with H3 hysteresis loop, which indicates that VIFP biosorbent is a mesoporous material.Additionally, H3 hysteresis observed for VIFP biosorbent represents materials which produce slit-shaped pores and do not display any limiting adsorption at elevated relative pressure [35].Moreover, acid treatment results in the oxidation of the cellulose in the carbonaceous material, exposing the binding sites for easy diffusion of the dye molecules [36].
3.1.4.TEM Analysis of the VIPF Biosorbent.Further investigation of the adsorbent morphological features was studied using TEM.The TEM images of both untreated (Figure 4(a)) and acid-treated (Figure 4(b)) VIFP biosorbents show quasispherical particles.While most of the particles in the pristine VIPF material are highly agglomerated, the acid-treated VIFP biosorbent is somewhat separated.In addition, the TEM image of the untreated biosorbent displays a compact dark material ascribed as a carbonaceous material.At the same time, the carbonaceous particles in the acid-treated VIFP biosorbent appear to be somewhat clear and well dispersed.
3.1.5.FT-IR Analysis of the VIPF Biosorbent.FT-IR spectral signatures for the untreated VIPF biosorbent in Figure 5 show a broad peak at 3272 cm -1 due to O-H stretching vibration of hydrogen-bonded hydroxyl groups that can be attributed to carboxyls, phenols or alcohols, and water.The peak at 2921 cm -1 shows the presence of C-H stretching vibrations in the cellulose unit.Peaks at 1729, 1436, and 1231 cm -1 arise from the hemicellulose unit.The peak at 1729 cm -1 is due to C=O stretching vibration due to esters, aldehydes, or ketones.The vibration peak at 1436 cm -1 is due to H-CH and O-CH in-plane bending vibration, and that occurring at 1231 cm -1 corresponds to COH bending at C6.A small peak at 1603 cm -1 corresponds to C=C stretching, which may be due to the aromatic moieties present in the material.The aromatic skeletal vibrations recorded at 1533 cm -1 are reported to have originated from the lignin unit.Also, a peak at 1316 cm -1 may be due to CH 2 rocking vibration at C6, and it may also show the presence of COO -symmetric stretching vibration.The sharp peak at 1017 cm -1 depicts the presence of C-O groups that arises due to acids, phenols, esters, aromatic compounds, and alcohol [37].
After acid treatment, the IR spectrum presented in Figure 5 shows crucial changes in the adsorbent's structure, manifested by the disappearance and shifting of the peaks to higher or lower wave numbers.This observation indicates that the acid treatment facilitated the dissolution of lignin and hemicellulose units.These changes, along with the oxidation of C6 due to acid treatment, could have impacted significant changes in the porosity of the biosorbent.The O-H stretching vibration peak shifted from 3272 to 3350 cm -1 .This shift can be ascribed to the modifications at C6 in converting the primary hydroxyl group to the carboxyl group, as illustrated in Figure 5.More notable changes in the intensity and position of the absorption peaks were also apparent for the peaks at 2921, 1729, 1603, 1316, 1231, and 1017 cm -1 which shifted to 2928 cm -1 , 1720, 1624, 1320, 1228, and     Adsorption Science & Technology carboxy cellulose nanofibers from untreated biomass using nitric acid alone and a combination of nitric acid with sodium nitrite [36].Supplementary information Figure S3 further explains the proposed mechanism for the adsorption process of CR dye by VIFP biosorbent [37].At the acidic pH of the solution, the CR molecule dissociates to give polar groups of R-SO 3 -, NH 2 , and -N=N-groups which become protonated.Similarly, at the same pH, the surface groups of the biosorbent, such as -COOH and -OH, become protonated to -COOH 2 + and OH 2 + , respectively.This creates room for hydrogen bonding between the oxygen-containing groups of the biosorbent (-COOH 2 + and OH 2 + ) with the nitrogencontaining group on the CR molecule ( + NH 2 and -+ N=N-).Also, electrostatic interaction is expected between the -SO 3 of the CR molecule and -COOH 2 + on the surface of the biosorbent.
3.1.6.Point of Zero Charge (pzc).The biosorption of environmental pollutants from an aqueous solution depends on the nature of the contaminant being removed and the surface chemistry of the biosorbent.The relationship between biosorbent surface chemistry and pollutant nature can best be described by the point of zero charge (pH pzc ).Generally, pH pzc zero implies that the biosorbent surface has no charge.The point of zero charge of the VIFP biosorbent was found to be 6.42 (Figure 6) in this investigation, indicating that the surface of the VIFP biosorbent is negatively charged above this pH and positively charged below this pH.The pH below this value results in protonation of the surface of the VIFP biosorbent, which facilitates strong electrostatic interaction with the negatively charged ions in the dye.The isoelectric point of CR dye is 3, and at any pH below this point, it exists in its molecular form, while at pH above, it exists in its dissociative nature.Therefore, CR dye is expected to be negatively charged at a pH greater than 4. This, in turn, causes the repulsion of the negatively charged CR ions with the negatively charged surface at high pH.

Batch Adsorption
Studies.This study investigated the biosorption of CR dye by VIPF via a batch system.Evaluation of the adsorption capacity and the rate of adsorption of CR dye onto VIFP biosorbent was performed at different initial CR dye concentrations, solution pH, VIFP dosage, contact time, and temperature.

Effect of pH.
To evaluate the effect of pH on the removal of CR dye by VIFP biosorbent, studies were carried out in the pH range of 2-10.The results (Figure 7) show that the maximum adsorption occurred in an acidic environment.The high adsorption efficiency of 78% at pH 2 can be substantiated by the surface charge of the biosorbent, which is preferentially protonated in acidic media.In an acidic medium, adsorption is mostly favoured due to a positively charged surface interacting strongly with the anionic dye.Generally, the positive charge acquired on the surface can be elucidated by the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation ðpH = pKa + log ð½conjugate base/½weak acidÞÞ, which shows the relationship between pH and pKa.It has been reported that the −COOH group presents a pKa value of approximately 4.5 [38].When pH is lower than pKa, (pH < pKa), this group carries a positive charge which results from a strong electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged SO 3 − group of dye and the positively charged surface.Another interaction existing is hydrogen bonding between the dye groups with nitrogen (amine (−NH 2 ) and azo (−N=N−)) and oxygen from the surface groups of the VIFP biosorbent.It was further observed that the efficiency of the VIFP biosorbent towards removing CR dye decreased with the increase in solution pH.At higher pH (basic condition), the functional groups are said to be anionic.For instance, the carboxylic groups (−COOH) of the biosorbent completely ionize to COO− at higher pH.This leads to interionic repulsion between the negatively charged ions of the dye and the biosorbent, which decreases the adsorption efficiency [37].Moreover, the decrease in adsorption efficiency as the pH increases is due to the accumulation of excess OH − ions in the solution, which compete for the adsorption sites [39].Various studies have also reported a similar trend in the adsorption of CR dye using coir pith, Phoenix dactylifera seeds, and activated carbon [39][40][41].

Effect of VIFP Biosorbent Dosage.
For catalytic activity, the amount of VIFP biosorbent is another significant component since it substantiates the amount of CR dye that a   Adsorption Science & Technology specified mass of adsorbent can adsorb.The effect of VIFP biosorbent dosage (0.1-0.9 g) on the adsorption of CR dye is shown in Figure 8.The trend shows that the adsorption of CR dye is enhanced as the biosorbent dosage increases from 0.1 to 0.7 g.This increase in adsorption efficiency from 75.94% for 0.1 g to 99.74% for 0.7 g is due to increased VIFP surface binding sites that facilitate the interaction with the ions in the dye.This is obvious because the increase in biosorbent dosage occurs at constant dye molecules in the solution (fixed concentration), giving a high possibility of creating more binding sites than the available adsorbate molecules.Consequently, some of the binding sites remain unoccupied.It was also established from the BET, SEM, and FT-IR results that acid treatment increases the porous nature of the biosorbent, which in turn exposes the binding sites of cellulose unit (-OH and COOH groups) that are responsible for binding CR dye molecules.When the VIFP dosage was increased to 0.9 g, the absorption efficiency decreased, which is attributed to aggregation, which impedes further access to adsorption sites.Therefore, the maximum adsorption efficiency of 99.74% obtained with 0.7 g of VIFP was considered the optimum dosage for other experiments.
The trend of adsorption efficiency as a function of VIFP dosage agrees well with that reported by Pathania et al., who achieved maximum adsorption of 84% with a biosorbent dosage of 0.6 g [40].This study's results also relate to those of Vimonses et al., in which clay materials were used to remove CR dye, recording an increase in adsorption efficiency from 18 to 100% and 12 to 95% for kaolin and zeolite adsorbents, respectively [28].

Effect of Contact Time.
The influence of contact time on the adsorption of CR dye was investigated in the range of 30 -210 min at pH = 2, a temperature of 298 K, a dye concentration of 50 mg/L, and a VIFP dose of 0.7 g.The results in Figure 9 show the sharp adsorption of CR dye at the initial stages due to abundant binding sites and sufficient surface area of the acid-treated VIFP adsorbent.Generally, the results indicate that the adsorption efficiency rapidly increased from 21.46 to 84.47% as the contact time varied from 30 to 180 min.This conclusion is supported by Namasivayam and Kavitha [39].This swift increase in CR dye uptake at the outset can be linked to active sites on the VIFP surface.However, the adsorption efficiency decreased when the contact time was increased to 210 min.This is because, after 180 minutes of adsorption, the available vacant active sites were crowded by CR dye molecules, leading to repulsion between dye molecules on the VIFP biosorbent and those present in the solution.
Consequently, the repulsive force causes a reduction in the quantity of dye to be adsorbed [42].Therefore, the optimum contact time for the adsorption of CR dye on VIFP adsorbent was achieved at 180 min.A similar trend was achieved by Chukki et al. [43] in their studies on the removal of CR dye by using Chrysanthemum indicum microparticles.

Effect of Initial CR Dye Concentration. The results in
Figure 10 depict that the adsorption efficiency behaves inversely with the initial CR dye concentration.The adsorp-tion efficiency decreases as the initial CR dye concentration increases.Due to the copious adsorption sites on the surface of the adsorbent, the adsorption process was favoured at low dye concentrations.The higher adsorption efficiency of 99.74% was achieved at a CR dye concentration of 10 mg/L, which was then reduced to 96.6% at a CR dye concentration of 80 mg/L.This decreasing efficiency at higher CR dye concentrations is due to the saturation of the fixed number of VIFP active sites.At high concentrations, dye molecules tend to aggregate, forming more giant micelles, which decrease the diffusion of the ions into the surface sites of the biosorbent.The trend remained the same at different temperatures.Since the maximum adsorption was attained at 10 mg/L, this value was taken as the optimum initial dye concentration.A similar observation was reported by Lafi et al. on the removal of CR dye using adsorbents prepared from Phoenix dactylifera seeds [37].Variation of adsorption efficiency of VIFP biosorbent with initial CR dye concentration yielded a similar trend at different temperatures.However, the adsorption of CR dye was observed to be favoured with increasing temperature.9 Adsorption Science & Technology interval of 298 K to 333 K. Other experimental variables were kept at an optimum level of pH 2, VIFP dosage of 0.7 g, contact time of 180 min, and initial CR dye concentration of 10 mg/L.The results in Figure 11 indicate that increasing the temperature from 298 K to 333 K increased the removal efficiency from 69.26 to 91.46%.This observation justifies the endothermic nature of the adsorption of CR dye by VIFP biosorbent.This means that a supply of energy from the surrounding is required to achieve high adsorption of CR dye.Maximum adsorption was evident at 328 K, implying that at this particular temperature, more dye molecules were diffused across the extrinsic boundary and internal pores of the surface of the VIFP biosorbent.However, when the temperature was increased beyond 328 K, the adsorption efficiency was reduced.These results corroborate those reported by Amar et al. who utilized Mg-doped CoFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles to remove CR dye from aqueous solutions [9].

Adsorption Isotherm Models.
The equilibrium adsorption isotherm models play important roles in designing the adsorption systems and understanding the interaction pattern between the adsorbent and adsorbate.In this study, we have employed the most common Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models to get an insight into the interaction of CR dye with VIFP biosorbent at equilibrium.The Freundlich isotherm model describes the multilayer coverage of the adsorption processes ascribed to the presence of a heterogeneous adsorbent system.From the linear form of the Freundlich model (Equation (2) and Figure 12(a)), the values of K F and n parameters (Table 2) were determined, which offer insight into the extent of adsorption and the heterogeneity of the adsorbent, respectively.Furthermore, the value of n was found to be 1.54, depicting the favourability of the adsorption process.This is because the value n conforms to the relation 1 < n < 10, and it has been established that, for a favourable adsorption process, the values of n should be in the range of 1-10 [44].
On the other hand, the Langmuir model has based on the premise that adsorption occurs at particular homogenous binding sites within the adsorbent.Equation ( 3) was used to plot Figure 12(b), which was then utilized to obtain the data displayed in Table 2, i.e., q m , K L, R 2 , and R L , which represent the maximum adsorption capacity, the maximum affinity of the biosorbent binding sites, correlation coefficient, and equilibrium factor, respectively.The feasibility of the adsorption process was deduced by the values of the separation factor, R L , and was obtained by manipulating Equation (4).In principle, the value of the separation factor, 0 < RL < 1, represents a favourable adsorption process.In this study, the value of R L was found to be 0.83, which is less than 1 but greater than 0, signifying favourable CR dye adsorption by VIFP biosorbent.As a result, the maximum adsorption capacity (q m ) for the uptake of CR dye molecules on VIFP obtained from the Langmuir isotherm was 7.91 mg/g.From this point of view, each CR-VIFP adsorption had equivalent adsorption activation energy, and there was monolayer coverage of CR molecules on the surface of the biosorbent.In addition, the correlation coefficient (R 2 ), which describes the favourability of the Langmuir and Freundlich models to the experimental data, was also determined.The Langmuir isotherm model recorded a higher correlation coefficient, R 2 (0.97918), than the Freundlich model (0.94235), as shown in Table 2.This implies that the Langmuir model better explains the experimental data for the adsorption of CR onto VIFP biosorbent than the Freundlich model.This further infers that there was a monolayer fitting of the CR dye molecule on the surface of the VIFP biosorbent.

Biosorption Kinetic
Studies.Determination of biosorption kinetics was important to get insight into the potential biosorption mechanism, reaction pathway, and the time taken for the process to attain equilibrium.Three kinetic models were employed to fit the experimental results: pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intraparticle diffusion.The pseudo-first-order kinetic model assumes that physisorption plays the leading part in the biosorption process.With the help of pseudo-first-order Equations ( 5) and ( 6), the plot of log (q e − q t ) vs. t was obtained, while   Adsorption Science & Technology pseudo-second-order Equations ( 7) and ( 8) were used to obtain a plot of t/q t vs. time min) [45].The correlation coefficient for the pseudo-first-order was found to be 0.96051, while that of the pseudo-second-order was 0.9997, as shown in Figures 13(a) and 13(b) and Table 3.The lower correlation coefficient, R 2 , for the pseudo-first-order (0.9605) compared to that obtained for the pseudo-second-order (0.9997) suggests that the pseudo-first-order kinetic model is not an ideal fit to explain the adsorption process.Therefore, in this study, pseudo-second-order best explains the adsorption process, indicating that both the adsorbate and the biosorbent determine the mechanism of the adsorption process.The calculated values of q e in the pseudo-second-order kinetic model correspond to the experimental values, signifying a better fit of CR dye adsorption data into pseudosecond-order kinetics.Similar findings have been recounted on the adsorption of environmental pollutants by using different adsorbents [46][47][48][49].Furthermore, the intraparticle diffusion model was employed to better understand the underlying adsorption mechanism and the rate-determining step.From Equation (9), the intraparticle diffusion model suggests that if by plotting q t versus t 0:5 yields a linear graph passing through the origin, then intraparticle diffusion is the only rate-limiting step of the adsorption process.Figure 13(c) shows that the plot of q t versus t 0:5 is not linear over the whole range of time and did not pass through the origin.The plot is evidently separated into three linear portions, signifying the multistages of the adsorption process.Since none of the three regions of the plot gave a linear straight line segment passing through the origin, the intraparticle diffusion is involved in the adsorption process but not the only rate-controlling step.This further indicates that film diffusion and intraparticle diffusion occurred simultaneously.The rate of adsorption of CR dye onto VIFP biosorbent may be controlled by other mechanisms such as complexation or ion exchange which may be operating concurrently [50].Therefore, the mechanism of CR dye removal from aqueous phase by adsorption is assumed to consist of several steps including migration of the dye molecules from the bulk solution to the surface of the sorbent, diffusion through the boundary layer to the surface of the sorbent, and adsorption at sites and intraparticle diffusion into the interior of the biosorbent [51].The parameters for interparticle diffusion model are shown in Table 3.
3.5.Biosorption Thermodynamics.Important parameters such as a change in the Gibbs free energy (ΔG °), change in enthalpy (ΔH °), and change in entropy (ΔS) were employed in explaining the thermodynamics of the adsorption process.These parameters were determined using Equations ( 10), (11), and (12) and are presented in Table 4.The standard ΔH °and ΔS were obtained from the plot of lnk d against 1/TðK −1 Þ, as shown in Figure 14, in which ΔH °is obtained from the slope and ΔS from the y-intercept of the plot.
The results presented in Table 4 show a positive value of ΔH °(41.42 kJ/mol), which indicates the endothermic nature of the adsorption of CR dye by VIFP biosorbent.Also, the positive value of ΔS °(158.32J/mol.K) reflects a spontaneous biosorption of CR dye.This value of ΔS °manifests a rise in the randomness between the sorbate and solution during the adsorption process [52].Additionally, the spontaneity of the CR dye biosorption is equally aided by the values of free energy at different temperatures.The negative values   15 show the characteristic functional group of VIFP biosorbent before and after the adsorption of CR dye.The spectra show remarkable changes in the peak position of the VIFP biosorbent after the adsorption of CR dye.For example, a broad peak at 3350 cm −1 , which corresponds to the -OH stretching vibration of phenols and alcohols in lignin and cellulose of VIFP, shifted to 3335 cm −1 after the adsorption process.Other peaks in the spectrum of acidtreated VIFP before CR dye adsorption are 2928, 1624, 1320, and 1014 cm −1 , corresponding to -CH 2 , -C=C, C-C, and C-O stretching, respectively.These peaks shifted to   5 show that untreated VIFP biosorbent recorded a low adsorption efficiency of 50.3% compared to 92.3% of the acidtreated VIFP biosorbent.The results agree with the BET results, which showed enhancement of porosity characteristics such as increased specific surface area, pore volume, and pore radius of the acid-treated VIFP biosorbent.Also, the FT-IR results presented in Figure 5 show crucial changes in the adsorbent's structure after acid treatment, including the dissolution of lignin and hemicellulose units and oxidation of C6.These changes could have contributed to significant changes in the porosity of the VIFP biosorbent, hence augmenting its adsorption behaviour.A similar observation was reported by Dawood and Sen, where untreated pine exhibited a low adsorption capacity of 32.65 mg/g compared to the acid-treated pine cone, which showed enhanced adsorption of 40.19 mg/g at the same experimental conditions [51].

Desorption Studies.
A desorption study of the adsorbent is of paramount importance for the adsorption process to be economically viable.The results in Figure 16 show that as the solution pH increased, the desorption efficiency was also observed to augment.This suggests that the treatment of the loaded biosorbent with NaOH generated OH -ions in the solution, which surrounded the carbon surface resulting in repulsive forces with the negatively charged ions of the CR dye, which in turn lowers the adsorption efficiency.It is also observed that a minimal amount of dye was desorbed, increasing very slightly throughout the desorption process.This indicates the strong interaction between CR dye molecules and the surface of the biosorbent.It also infers that the chemisorption mechanism prevailed in the adsorption process.Similar results were observed in Namasivayam and Kavitha's study on removing CR dye by coir pith [39].6).The efficiencies of the reported biosorbents differ depending on the type of biomass used, preparation procedure, experimental conditions, and nature of the pollutant being removed.The results obtained in this study have demonstrated that VIFP biosorbent recorded higher adsorption efficiency, similar to those reported in previous studies.Table 6 shows a comparison of the adsorption efficiency of VIFP biosorbent relative to other adsorbents reported in previous studies.

Conclusion
This study demonstrates that the acid-treated biosorbent prepared from Vangueria infausta fruit pericarp is suitable for removing Congo red dye in wastewater.At optimum pH of 2, biosorbent dosage of 0.7 g, initial dye concentration of 10 mg/L, contact time of 180 minutes, and temperature of 328 K, the maximum efficiency of 92.3% was achieved for the acid-treated VIFP biosorbent.The adsorption process in this study was spontaneous and is well described by the Langmuir adsorption isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetics.These results assert that Vangueria infausta fruit pericarp could be sustainably used as a biosorbent in small-scale or large-scale wastewater treatment plants to remove dyes.

3. 1 . 3 .
SEM Analysis.The surface characteristics of the adsorbent before and after acid treatment were characterised by SEM.The SEM micrographs of the pristine VIFP material (Figure3(a)) showed irregular and porous heterogeneous surfaces.The SEM image of the acid-treated VIFP biosorbent (Figure3(b)) displays improvement in the porous nature of the material.Pores of various sizes, cracks, and cavities were formed after acid treatment.The adsorption process and how the dye molecules diffuse into the interior space of VIFP particles are aided by this significant enhancement in surface characteristics.The change in the porous nature of the biosorbent could be attributed to the reaction of cellulose components in the biosorbent with HNO 3 .

Figure 3 :
Figure 3: SEM images for (a) untreated VIFP sample and (b) acid-treated VIFP samples at a magnification of 10,000x.

42 Figure 6 :
Figure 6: Point of zero charge of the VIFP biosorbent.

Figure 7 :
Figure 7: Effect of pH on CR dye uptake by VIFP biosorbent (0.7 g of VIFP, 50 mg/L initial CR concentration, and contact time of 180 min at 298 K).

Figure 9 :
Figure 9: Effect of contact time on adsorption of CR dye by VIFP (pH 2, 0.7 g VIFP, and 50 mg/L initial CR concentration at 298 K).

Figure 10 :
Figure 10: Effect of initial dye concentration on CR dye uptake by VIFP biosorbent (pH 2, 0.7 g VIFP dosage, and contact time of 180 min at 298-308 K).

Figure 11 :
Figure 11: Effect of temperature on CR dye adsorption by VIFP biosorbent (pH 2, 0.7 g of VIFP, 10 mg/L initial CR concentration, and contact time of 180 min).

Figure 15 :
Figure 15: FT-IR spectra of acid-treated VIFP biosorbent before and after adsorption of CR dye.

Figure 16 :
Figure 16: Effect of pH on desorption efficiency.

2
Adsorption Science & Technology located in Ikungi district in Singida region, Tanzania.Reagents and chemicals used in this study were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific manufacturer.The reagents and chemicals were of analytical grade and included HCl (35-37%), HNO 3 (69-72%), NaOH (97%), deionized water, and Congo red dye (C 32 H 22 N 6 Na 2 O 6 S 2

Table 1 :
BET analysis parameters for untreated and treated VIFP biosorbents.
-1, respectively.The disappearance of absorption peaks at 1533 and 1436 cm -1 was also noted.It was further revealed that following acid treatment, the intensity of the peaks responsible for the hemicelluloses unit decreased while some of them vanished.In addition, the peak at 1533 cm -1 that arises from the lignin unit disappeared in the acid-treated VIFP biosorbent.This observation further suggests that acid treatment influenced the removal of impurities, oxidation at C6, and exposing functional groups responsible for binding pollutants.Sharma et al. reported similar results in preparing

Table 2 :
Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm parameters for CR dye adsorption by VIFP.FT-IR Analysis for Acid-Treated VIFP before and after Adsorption of CR Dye.The FT-IR results presented in Figure

Table 3 :
Pseudo-first-and pseudo-second-order and intraparticle diffusion kinetic parameters for adsorption of CR by treated VIFP (pH 2, 0.7 g VIFP, contact time of 30-210 min, and initial CR concentration of 10 mg/L).

Table 4 :
Calculated thermodynamic parameters (pH 2, 0.7 g of VIFP, contact time of 180 min, and initial CR concentration of 10 mg/L at a temperature range of 298-328 K).
3.7.Comparison of Adsorption Efficiency of Untreated andTreated VIFP Biosorbent.To compare adsorption efficiency between untreated and acid-treated VIFP biosorbents, adsorption experiments were performed at optimum pH of 2, VIFP dosage of 0.7 g, contact time of 180 min, and initial CR dye concentration of 10 mg/L.The results in Table

Table 5 :
Adsorption efficiency of untreated and acid-treated VIFP biosorbent (optimum pH of 2, initial CR dye concentration of 10 mg/L, VIFP dose of 0.7 g, and contact time of 180 min).

Table 6 :
Comparison of the performance of VIFP with other adsorbents on the removal of CR dye from aqueous solution.