BioMed Research International

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 825453, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/825453

Research Article

Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Shape, Height, and Location of the Mandibular Lingula in a Population of Children

Ahmet Ercan Sekerci,¹ Kenan Cantekin,² and Mustafa Aydinbelge²

¹Department of Oral Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey

²Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey

Received 16 April 2013; Revised 27 September 2013; Accepted 29 September 2013

Academic Editor: Mohammadali M. Shoja

Copyright © 2013 Ahmet Ercan Sekerci et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

 Objectives. This is the first study to identify and classify the different morphological shapes of the mandibular lingula (ML) in children using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the shape, height, and location of the ML in relation to the surrounding structures using CBCT images of mandibles obtained from 269 children. The shape of the ML was classified into triangular, truncated, nodular, or assimilated types. The location was determined by five distances. The height of the lingula was also measured from the lingular tip to the mandibular foramen. Results. A nodular shape of the ML was most commonly found (48.3%, ) followed by truncated (23.4%, ), assimilated (14.4%, ), and triangular (13.7%, ). The mean distance of ML from the anterior and posterior borders of mandibular ramus was  mm and  mm, respectively. In the majority of the mandibles studied, the ML was located above the occlusal plane. Conclusion. The present study provides new information to the literature concerning the shape, height, and location of the lingula in a Turkish pediatric population. This finding may assist clinicians to localize the lingula and avoid intraoperative complications.

1. Introduction

The objectives of the present investigation are to determine the shape, height, and location of the lingula in relation to the mandibular ramal landmarks and the mandibular first molar in a Turkish pediatric population of 6- to 12-year-old children using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The differences in the parameters were also evaluated between the sexes. Comparisons with previous studies of various ethnic and racial groups were also assessed.

The lingula is a tongue-shaped bony projection on the medical surface of the mandibular ramus close to the posterior margin of the mandibular foramen [1]. The exact location of the mandibular foramen on radiographs is not always easy to be established due to its radiolucency and the superimposition of contralateral mandibular structures [2]. The mandibular foramen has often considered to be the most reliable reference point for approaching the inferior alveolar nerve in several anesthesia techniques, which led to several studies about its position and its anatomical relationships to clinically recognizable landmarks. It has been speculated that the mandibular lingula and foramen change the ratio of their positions on the ramus of growing children [3]. Tsai [4] observed in children a variation in the difference between the distance from the mandibular foramen to the anterior border and to the posterior border. This variation is caused by regional growth in different directions in each of Hellman’s dental developmental stages [3].

Because of its connection to nerve and vascular structures the study of the lingula features provides significant information related to oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures, such as the sagittal split ramus osteotomy, vertical ramus osteotomy, inverted L osteotomy [2], orthognathic surgery, mandibular trauma management, eradication of benign and malignant lesions, preprosthetic surgery, and nerve injury during inferior mandibular nerve block [3]. The lingula is used for identifying the site for injection of local anaesthetics or for excision of nerve for facial neuralgia [4]. If oral-maxillofacial surgeons are unable to identify the lingula correctly, intraoperative complications such as hemorrhage, unfavorable fracture nerve injury and may occur [5, 6].

The present study is unique in that the mandibles were collected from a single ethnic group (Turkish) with known ages and gender. The number of samples in the present study was large enough to compare the shape of the lingula and its distribution in addition to determining the location of the lingula. The subjects (both girls and boys) have a known and similar age range and the results were subjected to statistical analyses. It was therefore possible to investigate sex and side differences.

The researchers analyzed the morphological characteristics of the lingula, and they stated at the conclusion that such structural variability could account for failure to block the inferior alveolar nerve [7, 8]. Variations in the shape of the lingula have been reported by various authors [9–11]; for example, Tuli et al. [5, 6] classified lingula into four different types based on its shape, namely, triangular, truncated, nodular, and assimilated types.

2. Material and Methods

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Board of the Medical Faculty of Erciyes University. We designed a retrospective study composed of CBCT images of 2,103 patients who are presented to the Dentomaxillofacial Radiology service at the Erciyes University, Dentistry Faculty.

A schematic illustration of the preparation of the samples is demonstrated in Figure 1. All 269 patients had been referred for CBCT diagnosis and treatment planning and consisted of 19 impacted tooth patients, 178 orthodontic patients, 25 possible pathosis patients, 27 supernumerary tooth patients, and 20 temporomandibular joint disorder patients (Table 1).

Table 1: Description of the 269 subjects and their indications for cone beam CT (CBCT) referral.

Reason for Scan
No. of Subjects

Impaction localization
19

Orthodontic records
178

Other possible pathosis
25

Supernumerary teeth localization
27

TMJ assessment
20

Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the preparation of the samples was demonstrated.

The shapes of the lingula were classified using the classification proposed by Tsai [4]. To determine the exact location of lingula, the distance of the tip of the lingula from various mandibular ramal landmarks was measured (Figures 2(a)–2(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2: Three-dimensional CBCT image of the internal surface of the mandible showing the measurement for localizing the position of the lingula, entrance of mandibular foramen from the various landmarks. The “” measurement indicated the distance in millimetres found between the most anterior part of the mandibular lingula points to the anterior border of the mandibular ramus in a straight horizontal line; the “” measurement represented the distance between the most posterior part of the mandibular lingula and foramen points to the posterior border of the mandibular ramus in the same horizontal orientation; the “” measurement determined the distance between the lower point of the mandibular foramen and lingula points to the mandibular base in a vertical straight line; the “” measurement determined the distance most anterior part of the mandibular lingula points to the alveolar socket of first mandibular molar tooth; the “” measurement determined the distance between the same initial points as for the distance to the lower point of the sigmoid notch. The horizontal distances were measured parallel to the occlusal plane (OP) of the molars, whereas the vertical distances were measured perpendicular to the occlusal plane of the molars. The ratio of () to () was also calculated and used as an additional guide to localize the lingula [21]. Vertical distance from the tip of the lingula to the lower border of the mandibular foramen was measured as height of the lingula (). The measurement included the distance from the lingula to the occlusal plane of the molars ().

The CBCT mandibular images were analyzed in the NNT viewer which is a simple version of the NNT software of the CBCT (Newtom 5G, QR, Verona, Italy) machine in a Dell Precision T5400 workstation (Dell, Round Rock, TX, USA) and a 32-inch Dell LCD screen with a resolution of 1280 × 1024 pixels in a darkroom. The contrast and brightness of the images were adjusted using the image processing tool in the software to ensure optimal visualization. All the measurements were carried out by the same person (AES).

Statistical Analyses. The values obtained were tabulated; and the mean average and respective standard deviations (SDs) were calculated for all distances studied. The data analyses were performed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 16.0, (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill) and statistical significance was determined at the level of . The distances were calculated for each of the measurements on right and left sides, and a comparison of the mean values of the right and left sides were made by using -tests.

3. Results

The study subjects consisted of 144 (53.5%) girls and 125 (46.5%) boys. The mean age of the patients was 9.17 (SD: 1.87), with ages ranging from 6 to 12 years.

The most common shape was the nodular shape of the ML (48.3%, , followed by truncated (23.4%, ), assimilated (14.4%, ), and triangular (13.7%, ) (Figures 3(a)–3(d)). A bilateral shape (65.7%) was found more often than a unilateral one (34.3%). The MLs were found bilaterally as nodular in 92 sides (52%), truncated in 41 sides (23.2%), triangular in 23 sides (13.0%), and assimilated in 21 sides (1.9%). The distribution of the lingular shapes was also compared between girls and boys (Table 2); there was a statistical difference between gender in triangular and nodular shape.

Table 2: Distribution and incidence (in parentheses) of lingula in girls and boys, bilateral or unilateral.

Type
Shape
Girl

Boy

Total

()

()

value
Bilateral
Unilateral ()
Right
Left

Bilateral
Unilateral
Total
Bilateral
Unilateral
Total

()
Right
Left
269
269

1
Triangular
15 (10.4)
20 (6.9)
50
8 (6.4)
8 (3.2)
24
0,021*
23 (13.0)
16 (17.6)
12 (13.2)
39 (14.5)
35 (13.0)

2
Truncated
17 (11.8)
32 (11.1)
66
24 (19.2)
12 (4.8)
60
0,767
41(23.2)
40 (44.0)
4 (4.4)
81 (30.1)
45 (16.7)

3
Nodular
36 (25.0)
52 (18.1)
124
57 (44.8)
23 (9.2)
137
0,011*
93 (52.5)
16 (17.6)
59 (64.8)
108 (40.1)
152 ( 56.5)

4
Assimilated
12 (8.3)
24 (8.3)
48
9 (9.6)
11 (4.4)
29
0,069
21 (11.9)
19 (20.9)
16 (17.6)
41 (15.2)
37 (13.8)

Statistically significance.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3: Different shapes of lingulae (a) nodular; (b) triangular; (c) truncated; (d) assimilated.

The height, distance of ML from various mandibular ramal landmarks as well as from the distal side of the alveolar socket of the mandibular permanent first molar tooth and ML ratio are shown in Table 3. The ML was located at  mm from the anterior border of mandibular ramus,  mm from the posterior border of the ramus, and  mm from the mandibular notch. The mean distance of the ML from the distal surface of the alveolar socket of the mandibular permanent first molar tooth was  mm. The mean height () of the ML was  mm, and the mean ML ratio was determined out to be . Statistically significant difference was shown in Table 3. The lingulae were 14.6% (79) at the same level with the occlusal plane, 57.9% (312) above the plane, and 27.5% (97) below the plane.

Table 3: Distance of lingula from various ramal landmarks of 269 mandibula; distance from distal side of the alveolar socket of mandibular permanent first molar tooth and lingula ratio with their comparison between gender sides.

Side
Gender
Minimum (mm)
Maximum (mm)
Mean (mm)
Std. deviation
value
Total

Mean (mm)
Std. deviation

Distance from anterior border of ramus
x-right
1
10,1
19,4
13,6
2,5
0,13
13,3
2,3

0
9
16,1
12,7
1,9

x-left
1
10,2
19,5
14,1
2,1
0,054

0
9,3
18,9
12,8
2,5

Distance from posterior border of ramus
y1-right
1
7,5
13,2
10,9
1,6
0,000*
10,2
1,6

0
6,1
12,1
9,2
1,7

y1-left
1
8,7
13,8
11,3
1,5
0,015*

0
7,6
12,8
10,2
1,5

y2-right
1
4,2
10,7
7,0
2,3
0,019*
6,3
2,1

0
2,6
9,9
5,6
1,9

y2-left
1
3,2
11,2
7,2
2,3
0,026*

0
2,4
10,6
5,8
1,9

Distance from mandibular notch
z1-right
1
8,2
18,2
12,6
2,5
0,06
11,4
2,5

0
7
17,6
11,2
2,5

z1-left
1
7,2
16,2
12,4
2,5
0,014*

0
6,3
15,7
10,6
2,7

z2-right
1
13,2
24,4
17,9
3,0
0,041*
16,7
3,4

0
8,2
23,6
15,7
4,3

z2-left
1
8,4
22,5
17,8
3,2
0,005*

0
6,6
22,5
15,0
3,7

Distance from mandibular base
w1-right
1
19,9
28,1
23,6
2,2
0,039*
23,1
3,2

0
11,9
25,9
21,7
4,0

w1-left
1
14,7
27,8
23,9
3,0
0,56

0
11,9
26,3
23,5
3,0

w2-right
1
12,5
23,8
18,3
2,8
0,29
17,9
3,0

0
12,2
24,3
17,4
3,2

w2-left
1
11,9
23,4
18,2
2,9
0,71

0
12,7
22,8
17,9
3,0

Distance from distal side of the alveolar socket of 1st mandibular molar tooth
t-right
1
18,1
31,1
24,9
3,8
0,23
24,7
3,7

0
16,5
29,4
23,7
3,4

t-left
1
16,1
32
25,5
4,2
0,41

0
17,9
30,9
24,7
3,5

Height of the lingula

h1-right
1
3
9,7
5,6
1,4
0,027*
5,3
1,6

0
2,3
8,3
4,7
1,5

h1-left
1
3,6
9,6
6,3
1,6
0,000*

0
2,7
8,8
4,7
1,5

h2-right
1
1,3
5,1
2,1
0,5
0,74
2,0
1,2

0
0,3
5,1
1,9
1,5

h2-left
1
0,2
4,7
2,2
1,1
0,2

0
0,2
4,6
1,6
1,3

Lingula ratio: x/x + y1 (%)
right
1
0,45
0,59
0,54
0,04
0,48
0,55
0.047

0
0,51
0,63
0,58
0,05

left

1
0,44
0,61
0,53
0,05
0,52

0
0,49
0,62
0,55
0,048

Groups: 1: boy, 0: girl.

*Statistically significance.

4. Discussion

This is the first study to systematically evaluate the different morphological shapes of the ML in a pediatric population using CBCT images.

Pain control during dental procedures is very important in children to maintain a positive relationship between the child and dentist building trust and allaying fear and anxiety [12]. The inferior alveolar nerve block is the most common technique for providing local anesthesia [13] before restorative and surgical procedures of the mandibular posterior teeth [14]. This technique provides anesthesia of teeth, jaw, lip, gingiva, and mucous membrane up to the midline at the related part. However, Malamed identifies the inferior alveolar nerve block as the injection with the highest clinical failure rate, which he reports to be 15 to 20 percent when properly administered [15]. This high failure rate is often attributed to a high degree of variation in the morphology of the mandibular ramus and the location of the ML, especially in childhood and adolescence [16]. Therefore, defining the anatomical characteristics of the ML region plays an important role in successful anesthesia for dental and surgical procedures.

Several factors contribute to the reliability of landmark identification in children: the density and sharpness of the images, the anatomic complexity and superimposition of hard and soft tissues, the definition of the landmark, and the training level or experience of the observers [17, 18]. CBCT in dentistry has provided an imaging solution that has neither the projection errors associated with magnification nor the superimposition problems associated with traditional panoramic imaging [19]. In addition, CBCT has a wide range of tools, such as 3D reconstructions in any direction to permit the accurate identification of landmarks. Studies have reported excellent accuracy with 3D computed tomography (CT) [20]. Using CBCT (3D) in our study, identification of the AMF reflected a real clinical situation.

The frequency of different morphological types of lingula studied by different authors varied among populations and races [1, 5, 6, 21–26] (Table 4). Triangular and truncated shapes of the ML were found most commonly in previous studies [4]. In the present study, a total of 261 nodular shapes were detected in 168 of the 269 patients, and the frequency rate was found to be 48.3%, which differed from the rates generally reported in previous studies.

Table 4: The most prevalent shape of lingula in reported studies.

Authors
Reference
Year
Population

Tuli et al.
[5]
2000
Triangular

Devi et al.
[1]
2003
Truncated

Hossain et al.
[22]
2001
Triangular

Murlimanju et al.
[23]
2012
Triangular

Kositbowornchai et al.
[24]
2007
Truncated

Nirmale et al.
[25]
2012
Triangular

Lopes et al.
[26]
2010
Triangular

Jansisyanont et al.
[21]
2009
Truncated

Present study

Nodular

Tuli et al. [5, 6] observed gender variation of the lingula shapes in their specimens, and in their study, the triangular and assimilated types were the most common and the least common types in males (67.9% and 5%) and females (70.6% and 4.4%), respectively. They observed the truncated type twice as often in males (17.6% sides) as in females (8.8%), and the nodular type was a little less than double in females (16.2%) as compared with males (9.6%). In Jansisyanont et al.’s [21] study, there was a different genderwise variation observed. Of the 74 lingulae of mandibles belonging to females, from 60 lingulae, the triangular type was found in 21.7%, truncated in 23.3%, nodular in 33.3%, and assimilated in 21.7%, of cases. In case of males, the triangular type was observed in 36.5%, truncated in 31.1%, nodular in 27% and assimilated in 5.4% of cases. In our study, there was statistical difference between gender in the triangular and nodular shapes. The nodular and triangular types were the most and least prevalent types in boys and girls.

The height level of the mandibular foramen is an important reference for the inferior alveolar nerve block. Kanno et al. [3] found the mandibular lingula position to be 6 mm above the occlusal plane in 7- to 8-year-old children and 10 mm in 9- to 10- year-old children. Nicholson [7] found the foramen located to be below the occlusal surfaces of the molar teeth. Murlimanju et al. [23] reported in 38 dry, adult, Negroid, Zimbabwean mandibles that 47.1% were at the same level with the occlusal plane, 29.4% were above the and 23.5% were below the plane. Hwang et al. [27] reported that the location of the mandibular foramen changed with age, and that in children, it was located below the occlusal plane, while in adults it was 4.16 mm above the occlusal plane. In Kositbowornchai et al.’s [24] study, the mandibular foramen, measured from three-dimensional CBCT images, was 10 mm above the occlusal plane. In the present study, the mean height level () was measured to be  mm above the occlusal plane. A study on Thai mandibles [28] showed that the lingular heights on the right and left sides were  mm and  mm, respectively. Another study in the Thai population by Jansisyanont et al. [21] reported the height of the lingula to be  mm. In the present study, we defined the distance as in the pediatric population. Woo et al. [29] reported a study on a Korean population, in which the height of lingula was found to be higher, that is,  mm. In a study reported by Samanta and Kharb [30], the lingular height was found to be  mm. Another study in a Brazilian population by Monnazzi et al. [2] reported the height of lingula to be  mm. Nicholson [7] studied eighty dry, adult human mandibles of East Indian ethnic origin and reported a height of the lingula on the right side to be  mm and left side to be  mm. In the present study, the mean height of the lingula was  mm, with a statistical difference between gender on right and left sides (Table 3).

The location of the lingula varies among the various ethnic and racial groups [7, 24, 31, 32]. Nevertheless, the common trend was that the distances in females were shorter than or nearly equal to those found in males. This observation is consistent with the knowledge that females generally have larger mandibles than males [30]. In the present study, the mean distance of the lingula to the anterior border of mandibular ramus was  mm. The distance of the lingula from the other mandibular ramal landmarks observed in the present study varied from those reported in various populations as shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Comparison of various studies on location of lingual.

Authors
Reference
Study design
Population
Year
Distance from anterior border of ramus (mm)
Distance from posterior border of ramus (mm)
Distance from mandibular notch (mm)

Woo et al.
[29]
Dry mandible
Korea
2002
18.6 ± 2.5
16.1 ± 3.5
19.8 ± 5.1

Kositbowornchai et al.
[24]
Thai
2007
20.7 ± 2.8
15.4 ± 1.9
—

Jansisyanont et al.
[21]
Thai
2009
20.6 ± 3.5
18.0 ± 2.6
16.6 ± 2.9

Samanta and Kharb
[30]
India
2012
20.0 ± 2.4
15.0 ± 2.7
15.4 ± 2.7

Monnazzi et al.
[2]
Brazil
2012
16.5 ± 2.3
14.6 ± 2.13
16.4 ± 2.6

Present study

CBCT
Turkey
2013
13.3 ± 2.3
10.2 ± 1.6
11.4 ± 2.5

Jansisyanont et al. [21] and the study by Afsar et al. [31] reported that there was no difference in relation to the mandibular ramal landmarks and the mandibular second molar when comparing sex and side groups except for the distance from the lingula to the distal surface of the mandibular second molar of the female left and the male right groups. In the present study, the statistical differences are shown in Table 3.

Although the radiation doses from CBCT are significantly lower than in medical CT, they are generally higher than conventional dental radiography [33]. Recently, the SEDENTEXCT working group proposed provisional evidence-based selection criteria with clinical indications regarding when CBCT should be performed. CBCT should only be used when the clinical question cannot be answered by conventional radiography, and the field of view (FOV) should be limited to the region of interest [33]. Ideally, CBCT equipment should be able to offer a choice of volume sizes to reduce patients’ radiation exposure levels. A risk-benefit analysis must be performed on each individual patient when CBCT is being considered, and in order to assess the risk of CBCT, the effective dose must first be calculated as well.

5. Conclusion

The present study provides new information to the literature concerning the shape, height, and location of the mandibular lingual in the Turkish pediatric population. The findings of the present study could be utilized in clinical and dental procedures to localize the lingula and avoid intraoperative complications. The bilateral nodular shape of the lingula was most common in the whole population of study and in each sex. The mean height of the lingula was 5.3 mm. The lingula was located an average of 13.3 mm from the anterior border of the mandibular ramus, 11.4 mm from the mandibular notch, and 24.7 mm from the distal surface of the mandibular permanent first molar. The landmarks for the mandibular nerve block are important for efficient anesthesia during dental treatments. The results from the present study suggest that clinicians or oral surgeons should insert a needle approximately 13.3 mm from the anterior border of the ramus, and approximately 2.0 mm above the occlusal plane due to fact that the lingula in the majority of the samples was found above the occlusal plane.

Conflict of Interests

None of the authors have any conflict of interests.

References

R. Devi, N. Arna, K. Y. Manjunath, and B. Balasubramanyam, “Incidence of morphological variants of mandibular lingula,” Indian Journal of Dental Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 210–213, 2003.

M. S. Monnazzi, L. A. Passeri, M. F. R. Gabrielli, P. D. A. Bolini, W. R. S. de Carvalho, and H. da Costa Machado, “Anatomic study of the mandibular foramen, lingula and antilingula in dry mandibles, and its statistical relationship between the true lingula and the antilingula,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 74–78, 2012.

C. M. Kanno, J. A. de Oliveira, M. Cannon, and A. A. F. Carvalho, “The mandibular lingula's position in children as a reference to inferior alveolar nerve block,” Journal of Dentistry for Children, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 56–60, 2005.

H.-H. Tsai, “Panoramic radiographic findings of the mandibular foramen from deciduous to early permanent dentition,” Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 215–219, 2004.

A. Tuli, R. Choudhry, S. Choudhry, S. Raheja, and S. Agarwal, “Variation in shape of the lingula in the adult human mandible,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 313–317, 2000.

F. Acebal-Bianco, P. L. Vuylsteke, M. Y. Mommaerts, and C. A. De Clercq, “Perioperative complications in corrective facial orthopedic surgery: a 5-year retrospective study,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 754–760, 2000.

M. L. Nicholson, “A study of the position of the mandibular foramen in the adult human mandible,” Anatomical Record, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 110–112, 1985.

J. Keros, P. Kobler, I. Baučić, and T. Ćabov, “Foramen mandibulae as an indicator of successful conduction anesthesia,” Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 327–331, 2001.

W. H. Hollinshead, Text Book of Anatomy, Harper and Row, Calcutta, India, 1st edition, 1962.

B. K. Berkovitz, G. R. Holland, and B. J. Moxham, Colour Atlas and Textbook of Oral Anatomy, Wolfe Medical Publication, London, UK, 2nd edition, 1978.

D. H. Morgan, L. R. House, W. P. Hall, and S. J. Vamuas, Diseases of Temporomandibular Apparatused, Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 2nd edition, 1982.

N. A. Aminabadi, R. M. Z. Farahani, and S. G. Oskouei, “Site-specificity of pain sensitivity to intraoral anesthetic injections in children,” Journal of Oral Science, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 239–243, 2009.

G. A. Madan, S. G. Madan, and A. D. Madan, “Failure of inferior alveolar nerve block: exploring the alternatives,” Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 133, no. 7, pp. 843–846, 2002.

K. Thangavelu, R. Kannan, N. S. Kumar, E. Rethish, S. Sabitha, and N. Sayeeganesh, “Significance of localization of mandibular foramen in an inferior alveolar nerve block,” Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 156–160, 2012.

S. F. Malamed, Handbook of Local Anesthesia, Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 4th edition, 1997.

G. A. Madan, S. G. Madan, and A. D. Madan, “Failure of inferior alveolar nerve block: exploring the alternatives,” Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 133, no. 7, pp. 843–846, 2002.

J. S. McWilliam and U. Welander, “The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 1978.

W. J. B. Houston, R. E. Maher, D. Mcelroy, and M. Sherriff, “Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 149–151, 1986.

A. A. Waitzman, J. C. Posnick, D. C. Armstrong, and G. E. Pron, “Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: part II. Normal values and growth trends,” The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, vol. 29, pp. 118–128, 1992.

D. A. Tyndall, J. B. Renner, C. Phillips, and S. R. Matteson, “Positional changes of the mandibular condyle assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1164–1172, 1992.

P. Jansisyanont, W. Apinhasmit, and S. Chompoopong, “Shape, height, and location of the lingula for sagittal ramus osteotomy in thais,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 787–793, 2009.

S. M. A. Hossain, S. I. Patwary, and M. Karim, “Variation in shape of the lingulae in the adult human mandible of Bangladeshi skulls,” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 233–236, 2001.

B. V. Murlimanju, L. V. Prabhu, M. M. Pai, M. T. Paul, V. V. Saralaya, and C. G. Kumar, “Morphological study of lingula of the mandibles in South Indian population,” Morphologie, vol. 96, no. 312, pp. 16–20, 2012.

S. Kositbowornchai, M. Siritapetawee, T. Damrongrungruang et al., “Shape of the lingula and its localization by panoramic radiograph versus dry mandibular measurement,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 689–694, 2007.

V. K. Nirmale, U. W. Mane, S. B. Sukre, and C. V. Diwan, “Morphological features of human mandible,” International Journal of Recent Trends in Science and Technology, vol. 3, pp. 33–43, 2012.

P. T. C. Lopes, G. A. M. Pereira, and A. M. P. V. Santos, “Morphological analysis of the lingula in dry mandibles of individuals in Southern Brazil,” Journal of Morphological Sciences, vol. 27, no. 3-4, pp. 136–138, 2010.

T. J. Hwang, S. C. Hsu, Q. F. Huang, and M. K. Guo, “Age changes in location of mandibular foramen,” Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 98–103, 1990.

Y. Viravudth and V. Plakornkul, “The mandibular foramen in Thais,” Siriraj Hospital Gazette, vol. 41, pp. 551–554, 1989.

S. S. Woo, J. Y. Cho, W. H. Park, I. H. Yoo, Y. S. Lee, and K. S. Shim, “A study of mandibular anatomy for orthognathic surgery in Koreans,” Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, vol. 28, pp. 126–131, 2002.

P. R. Samanta and P. Kharb, “Morphological analysis of the lingula in dry adult human mandibles of north Indian population,” Journal of Cranio-Maxillary Diseases, vol. 1, pp. 7–11, 2012.

A. Afsar, D. A. Haas, P. E. Rossouw, and R. E. Wood, “Radiographic localization of mandibular anesthesia landmarks,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 234–241, 1998.

H.-J. Kim, H.-Y. Lee, I.-H. Chung, I.-H. Cha, and C.-K. Yi, “Mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy in Koreans,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 1997.

J. B. Ludlow and M. Ivanovic, “Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 106–114, 2008.