BioMed Research International

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 524161, 10 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/524161

Research Article

Synthesis, Characterization and In Vitro Anticancer Activity of C-5 Curcumin Analogues with Potential to Inhibit TNF-α-Induced NF-κB Activation

Amit Anthwal,¹ Bandana K. Thakur,¹ M. S. M. Rawat,¹ D. S. Rawat,² Amit K. Tyagi,³ and Bharat B. Aggarwal³

¹Department of Chemistry, H.N.B. Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal, Uttarakhand 246174, India

²Department of Chemistry, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India

³Cytokine Research Laboratory and Pharmaceutical Development Center, Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA

Received 28 February 2014; Revised 2 June 2014; Accepted 4 June 2014; Published 24 July 2014

Academic Editor: Bruno C. Cavalcanti

Copyright © 2014 Amit Anthwal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

In a search of new compounds active against cancer, synthesis of a series of C-5 curcumin analogues was carried out. The new compounds demonstrated good cytotoxicity against chronic myeloid leukemia (KBM5) and colon cancer (HCT116) cell lines. Further, these compounds were found to have better potential to inhibit TNF-α-induced NF-κB activation in comparison to curcumin, which show their potential to act as anti-inflammatory agents. Some compounds were found to show higher cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines in comparison to curcumin used as standard.

1. Introduction

In the last few decades, importance has been given to biologically active natural products as these compounds generally do not have any side effects. The proof of this is the fact that more than 62% of the anticancer drugs approved from 1983 to 1994 are either natural products or natural product analogues [1]. Curcumin and related compounds, termed as curcuminoid, are among the compounds of great interest due to their wide range of biological activities [2–12]. Curcumin ability to inhibit the growth of various types of cancer cells at various stages of cancer progression is due to its potential to act on multiple targets [13–17]. The -diketone is the structural feature responsible for rapid metabolism of curcumin by aldo-keto reductase in liver [18]. Tremendous research work has been done to improve the bioavailability and absorption of curcumin [19]. Further, in vivo and in vitro studies showed that curcumin undergo rapid metabolism by oxidation, reduction, glucuronidation, and sulfation [20, 21], which occur at 4-OH [22]. In a rational approach to design new curcumin analogues the facts to be taken under consideration are modification of -diketone moiety and blocking 4-OH of curcumin analogues. In efforts to improve the activity and stability of curcumin analogues, C-5 curcumins have been designed and synthesized by various research groups [23, 24]. It has been reported that C-5 curcumin analogues show better activity and stability in in vitro and in vivo studies [25]. Yamakoshi et al. have done SAR studies on C-5 curcumin analogues. Important outcomes of their studies were that symmetry is important in case of tetrasubstituted C-5 curcumin analogues and 4-position is a possible site for attaching probe to enhance activity [26]. In search of new molecules with good cytotoxicity against cancer cells we planned to synthesize new C-5 curcumin analogues and selected amido-ether linker for blocking 4-OH (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Modification of curcumin to get new C-5 curcumin analogues.

As a part of our research work towards development of biologically important hybrid molecules [27], we designed new curcumin analogues. In present work, we report synthesis, theoretical prediction of physicochemical properties, cytotoxicity, and inhibition of TNF-α-induced NF-κB activation of C-5 curcumin analogues (3a –3p) in human cancer cell lines. New hybrid molecules demonstrated varying level of cytotoxicity against KBM5 and HCT116 cancer cell lines with some compounds being more active than curcumin against both cell lines. Also compounds were found to inhibit TNF--induced NF-κB activation.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The C-5 curcumin analogues were synthesized by multistep synthesis process. The amido-ether linkers (1a –1j) were synthesized by reaction of respective aromatic amines/benzyl amines with chloroacetyl chloride in the presence of K₂CO₃ as base and dichloromethane as solvent (Scheme 1). C-5 curcumin analogues (2a, 2b) were synthesized by reaction of 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde/vanillin with acetone in the presence of 1 : 1 acetic acid/HCl solvent as well as catalyst. The C-5 curcumin analogues (2a, 2b) were further reacted with amido-ether linkers (1a –1j) in the presence of K₂CO₃ as base and acetone as solvent to obtain the desired hybrid molecules (3a –3p) in good yields (Scheme 2).

Scheme 1

Scheme 2

2.2. Biology

All C-5 curcumin analogues were tested for their cytotoxicity on chronic myeloid leukemia (KBM5) and colon cancer (HCT116) cell lines. However, the cytotoxicity pattern of all analogues was similar for both cell lines (Table 1). In C-5 curcumin nucleus variations were done by substituting  –H by –OMe whereas in amido-ether linker substituted aromatic amide and benzylamide derivatives were used. In the case of curcumin analogues with aromatic amides (3a –3k), halogen substituents did not give fruitful results (3c, 3d, 3e) except for compounds 3b and 3k with chloro substituent at 3 and 4 positions, respectively, which demonstrated cytotoxicity better than curcumin in both cancer cell lines. The compounds without any substitution (3a, 3h) were found to be more active than the curcumin but the compound with −OMe group on C-5 curcumin ring (3h) was found most active. Substitution by nitro group in aromatic ring (3g, 3i) resulted in compounds with poor activity. Substitution by methyl groups at the 2,6-positions gave promising results in the case of molecule with –OMe substituent on C-5 curcumin ring (3j) but molecule without any substituent in C-5 curcumin ring demonstrated poor activity (3f). In case of curcumin analogues with benzylamide derivatives the hybrid molecule with  –OMe substitution in aromatic ring as well as C-5 curcumin nucleus demonstrated potent activity (3p) whereas other compounds without any substituent (3l) or with –Me (3m, 3o) and –OMe (3n) substituents on aromatic ring exhibited poor cytotoxicity. The newly synthesized compounds were also screened for their potential to inhibit TNF-α-induced NF-κB activation (Figure 2). All molecules demonstrated higher potential to inhibit TNF-α-induced NF-κB activation in comparison to curcumin from which it could be concluded that these compounds can act as very good anti-inflammatory agents.

Table 1: Inhibition of hybrid molecules (3a–3p) on chronic myeloid leukemia (KBM5) and colon cancer (HCT116) cell lines at 5 M.

Compound
Percentage growth inhibition KBM5
Percentage growth inhibition HCT116
Activity

3a

High

3b

High

3c

Moderate

3d

Moderate

3e

Moderate

3f

Low

3g

Low

3h

High

3i

Low

3j

High

3k

High

3l

Moderate

3m

Low

3n

Moderate

3o

Low

3p

High

Control

Curcumin

Compounds are classified based on potential to inhibit growth of KBM5 cancer cell lines at 5 M, >60%; high activity, >20%; moderate activity, <20%; low activity.

Figure 2: Downregulation of TNF-α-induced NF-κB activation in KBM5 cells. KBM-5 cells were incubated with 5 M dose of tested compounds for 8 h and then treated with 0.1 nM TNF-α for 30 min. Nuclear extracts were prepared and assayed for NF-κB activation using EMSA. The fold downmodulation of NF-κB as compared to TNF-α is shown.

2.3. Theoretical Predictions of Physicochemical Properties [28–31]

Molinspiration and Osiris software were used for theoretical prediction of physicochemical properties of the new hybrid molecules. The methodology developed by molinspiration is used to calculate (octanol/water partition coefficient). Total polar surface area (TPSA) has been reported to be a very good descriptor of various characteristics of compound such as absorption, including intestinal absorption, bioavailability, Caco-2 permeability, and blood brain barrier penetration. Theoretical molecular properties, predicted by molinspiration software, for new C-5 curcumin analogues (3a –3p) are tabulated in Table 2. The values of lipophilicity (log ) and total polar surface area (TPSA) are two important parameters for the prediction of oral bioavailability of drug molecules [32, 33]. It has been reported that molecules with TPSA values of 140  or more are likely to exhibit poor intestinal absorption [33].

Table 2: Molinspiration calculations of new curcumin analogues (3a–3p).

Compound
Molecular properties calculations
Drug likeness properties predictions

M.W.

TPSA
OH–NH interaction
N violation
Vol.
GPCR
ICM
KI
NRL
PI
EI

3a
532
5.905
93
2
2
486
−0.12
−0.50
−0.25
−0.12
−0.08
−0.17

3b
601
7.213
93
2
2
513
−0.17
−0.65
−0.35
−0.24
−0.12
−0.29

3c
601
7.261
93
2
2
513
−0.16
−0.65
−0.35
−0.23
−0.11
−0.41

3d
690
7.523
93
2
2
522
−0.22
−0.69
−0.37
−0.29
−0.15
−0.30

3e
568
6.232
93
2
2
496
−0.16
−0.66
−0.33
−0.21
−0.10
−0.27

3f
588
5.634
93
2
2
552
−0.28
−0.88
−0.50
−0.39
−0.19
−0.17

3g
622
5.775
185
2
3
5.33
−0.45
−1.11
−0.75
−0.66
−0.26
−0.60

3h
592
5.085
112
2
2
537
−0.27
−0.88
−0.49
−0.42
−0.15
−0.42

3i
682
4.954
263
2
2
584
−0.85
−1.74
−1.28
−1.25
−0.56
−1.13

3j
648
4.814
112
2
1
603
−0.59
−1.42
−0.94
−0.89
−0.40
−0.82

3k
661
6.440
112
2
2
564
−0.39
−1.11
−0.69
−0.63
−0.25
−0.61

3l
560
5.307
93
2
2
520
−0.11
−0.61
−0.34
−0.29
0.02
−0.22

3m
588
6.204
93
2
2
553
−0.22
−0.84
−050
−0.46
−0.05
−0.39

3n
620
5.421
112
2
2
571
−0.34
−1.06
−0.68
−0.66
−0.12
−0.55

3o
648
5.384
112
2
2
604
−0.54
−1.39
−0.94
−0.95
−0.28
−0.81

3p
680
4.601
130
2
2
622
−0.74
−1.68
−1.21
−1.23
−0.41
−1.04

Curcumin
368
2.303
93
2
0
332
−0.06
−0.20
−0.26
0.12
−0.14
−0.08

GPCRL: GPCR ligand; ICM: ion channel modulator; KI: kinase inhibitor; NRL: nuclear receptor ligand; PI: protease inhibitor; EI: enzyme inhibitor.

Theoretical molecular properties, predicted by Osiris software, for new C-5 curcumin analogues (3a –3p) are tabulated in Table 3 which include toxicity risks (mutagenicity, tumorigenicity, irritation, and reproduction) and physicochemical properties ( log , solubility, drug likeness, and drug score) of compounds (3a –3p). Toxicity risk alerts give probability of harmful risks under specified category. From data in Table 3 it is clear that most of the molecules are supposed to be nonmutagenic, nonirritating with no reproductive effects. The drug score is sum of various parameters such as drug likeness,  Log , log , molecular weight, and toxicity risks in the form of single valued figure that may be used to judge the compounds overall capability to qualify requirements for a drug. It was found that most of the compounds (3a –3p) have properties comparable to that of the standard compound curcumin.

Table 3: Osiris calculations of new curcumin analogues (3a–3p).

Compound
Prediction of toxicity risk
Molecular properties calculations

MUT
TUMO
IRRI
REP
M.W.

D-L
D-S

3a
G
G
G
G
532
5.04
−6.57
2.13
0.29

3b
G
G
G
G
600
6.26
−8.04
3.80
0.19

3c
G
G
G
G
600
6.26
−8.04
4.59
0.20

3d
G
G
G
G
688
6.43
−8.24
1.80
0.16

3e
G
G
G
G
568
5.15
−7.20
2.53
0.25

3f
G
G
G
G
588
6.30
−7.95
5.78
0.20

3g
Y
Y
G
G
622
4.78
−7.49
−1.47
0.09

3h
G
G
G
G
592
4.83
−6.61
3.27
0.28

3i
Y
Y
G
G
682
4.57
−7.53
−0.33
0.11

3j
G
G
G
G
648
6.09
−7.98
6.77
0.19

3k
G
G
G
G
660
6.05
−8.08
5.70
0.18

3l
G
G
G
G
560
4.61
−6.20
3.91
0.32

3m
G
G
G
G
588
5.24
−6.89
2.97
0.25

3n
G
G
G
G
620
4.40
−6.24
4.60
0.33

3o
G
G
G
G
480
5.03
−6.93
4.18
0.24

3p
G
G
G
G
680
4.19
−6.27
5.88
0.28

Curcumin
G
G
G
G
368
2.97
−3.62
−3.95
0.39

G = no toxicity risk; Y = low toxicity risk; R = high toxicity risk; MUT: mutagenic; TUMO: tumorigenic; IRRI: irritant; REP: reproductive effective; Mol. Wt.: molecular weight in g/mol; : log of octanol/water partition coefficient; : solubility; D-L: drug likeness; D-S: drug score.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General

All chemicals used in synthesis were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Himedia. Thin layer chromatography (Merck TLC silica gel 60 F₂₅₄) was used to monitor the progress of reactions. The compounds were purified when needed by silica gel column (60–120 meshes). Melting points were determined on EZ-Melt automated melting point apparatus, Stanford Research systems, and are uncorrected. IR (chloroform/film) spectra were recorded using Perkin-Elmer FT-IR spectrophotometer and values are expressed as cm⁻¹. Mass spectra were recorded in waters micromass LCT Mass Spectrometer. The ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded on Jeol ECX spectrospin at 400 MHz and 100 MHz, respectively, in deuterated solvents with TMS as an internal standard. Chemical shift values are recorded on  ppm and the coupling constants are in Hz.

3.2. General Procedure for Synthesis of N-Phenyl and N-Benzyl Acetamides (1a –1j)

To a stirred solution of respective aromatic amine derivatives/benzyl amine derivatives (10 mmol) in dichloromethane, 30 mmol of K₂CO₃ was added. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0°C and chloroacetyl chloride (11 mmol) was added slowly drop wise. After addition of chloroacetyl chloride reaction mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 3 hours. After completion of reaction solvent was evaporated with rota evaporator and residue obtained was filtered and washed thoroughly with water. The product obtained (1a –1j) was pure enough to be used as such in subsequent steps.

3.3. General Procedure for Synthesis of C-5 Curcumin Analogues (2a –2b)

To a stirred solution of acetone (30 mmol) in 1 : 1 acetic acid/HCl p-hydroxybenzaldehyde/vanillin (63 mmol) was added, respectively. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 16–18 hours at room temperature. After completion of reaction, the product was precipitated by addition of water to reaction mixture. The precipitate obtained was filtered, washed with water, and recrystallized from ethanol to get pure compound (2a, 2b) in good yield.

3.4. General Procedure for Synthesis of New C-5 Curcumin Analogues (3a –3p)

To a stirred solution of C-5 curcumin analogue (2a/2b) (0.84 mmol) in acetone, 0.25 mmol of KI and 2.52 mmol of K₂CO₃ were added. Further, 1.7 mmol of respective amide (1a –1j) was added to reaction mixture and it was allowed to stir at room temperature for 10–12 hours. After completion of reaction, monitored by TLC, the solvent was evaporated and residue obtained was filtered and washed with water. The crude product obtained was purified by column chromatography using ethyl acetate/hexane as eluent to get desired compounds in good yield (3a –3p).

3.4.1. -(((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy)bis(N-zhenylacetamide) 3a

Yield 80% (yellow solid); m.p. 193–195°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3377, 3058, 2914, 1679, 1649, 1599, 1534, 1507, 1442, 1328, 1248, 1173, 1098, 1058, 984, 837, and 755; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 4.77 (s, 4H), 7.06 (t, 3H,  Hz), 7.08 (d, 3H,  Hz), 7.19 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.29 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.32 (d, 3H,  Hz), 7.42 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.54 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.62 (d, 3H,  Hz), 7.71 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.75 (d, 3H,  Hz), and 10.11 (brs, 2H); TOF-MS m/z: 533.1998 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₃H₂₈N₂O₅: 532.1878.

3.4.2. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(3-chlorophenyl)acetamide) 3b

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 206–208°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3400, 2914, 1678, 1651, 1593, 1508, 1423, 1244, 1173, 1071, 996, 830, and 772; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 4.78 (s, 4H), 7.06 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.12 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.19 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.33 (t, 2H,  Hz), 7.37–7.46 (m, 1H), 7.53 (t, 2H,  Hz), 7.69 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.74 (d, 4H,  Hz), and 7.82 (s, 2H); TOF-MS m/z: 601.1219 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₃H₂₆Cl₂N₂O₅: 600.1345.

3.4.3. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(4-chlorophenyl)acetamide) 3c

Yield 85% (light yellow solid); m.p. 219–221°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3330, 2929, 1672, 1643, 1599, 1508, 1400, 1249, 1170, 1093, 1009, 974, 833, and 702; ¹H NMR (-DMSO, 400 MHz): 4.77 (s, 4H), 7.07 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.20 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.35 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.38 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.44–7.51 (m, 1H), 7.65 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.67 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.68 (d, 1H,  Hz), and 7.75 (d, 4H,  Hz); TOF-MS m/z: 601.1219 (M+1), calculated for C₃₃H₂₆Cl₂N₂O₅: 600.1345.

3.4.4. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(4-bromophenyl)acetamide) 3d

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 210–212°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3385, 2927, 1689, 1644, 1602, 15.08, 1397, 1244, 1172, 1065, 1008, 831, and 703; ¹H NMR (DMSO-,400 MHz): 4.77 (s, 4H), 7.06 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.19 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.48 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.60 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.71 (d, 2H,  Hz), and 7.74 (d, 4H,  Hz); TOF-MS m/z: 689.0208 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₃H₂₆Br₂N₂O₅: 688.0355.

3.4.5. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(4-fluorophenyl)acetamide) 3e

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 263-264°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3385, 3043, 2916, 1678, 1647, 1602, 1585, 1536, 1508, 1411, 1340, 1247, 1173, 1098, 1059, 984, 834, and 733; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz) : 4.77 (s, 4H), 7.08 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.15 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.16 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.18 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.22 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.65 (dd, 2H,  Hz,  Hz), 7.66 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.67 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.72 (d, 1H,  Hz), and 7.76 (d, 5H,  Hz); TOF-MS m/z: 569.1810 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₃H₂₆F₂N₂O₅: 568.1648.

3.4.6. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)acetamide) 3f

Yield 81% (yellow solid); m.p. 225–227°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3404, 2924, 1674, 1622, 1601, 1509, 1422, 1226, 1172, 1098, 980, 826, 764, and 703; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 2.11 (s, 12H), 4.81 (s, 4H), 7.07 (d, 6H,  Hz), 7.11 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.23 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.74 (d, 2H,  Hz), and 7.78 (d, 4H,  Hz); TOF-MS m/z: 589.2624 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₇H₃₆N₂O₅: 588.2354.

3.4.7. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(3-nitrophenyl)acetamide) 3g

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 185–187°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3380, 3122, 2913, 1703, 1648, 1600, 1527, 1508, 1425, 1350, 1242, 1173, 1069, 974, and 830; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 4.82 (s, 4H), 7.08 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.19 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.60 (t, 2H,  Hz), 7.72 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.75 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.91 (dd, 2H,  Hz,  Hz), 7.98 (d, 2H,  Hz), and 8.66 (t, 2H,  Hz); TOF-MS m/z: 623.1700 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₃H₂₆N₄O₉: 622.1546.

3.4.8. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(2-methoxy-4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-phenylacetamide) 3h

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 208–210°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3371, 2937, 1693, 1644, 1617, 1593, 1509, 1485, 1422, 1309, 1261, 1189, 1093, 1034, 978, 826, and 720; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz): 4.01 (s, 6H), 4.69 (s, 4H), 6.97 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.00 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.15 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.17 (s, 1H), 7.19 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.24 (dd, 2H, ,  Hz), 7.35 (d, 3H, J  Hz), 7.38 (s, 1H), 7.59 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.69 (d, 2H,  Hz), and 8.75 (brs, 2H); TOF-MS m/z: 593.2210 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₅H₃₂N₂O₇: 592.2340.

3.4.9. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(2-methoxy-4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(3-nitrophenyl)acetamide) 3i

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 173–175°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3381, 3102, 2930, 1693, 1657, 1597, 1531, 1425, 1350, 1256, 1140, 1100, 1030, 981, 803, and 737; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 3.88 (s, 6H), 4.82 (s, 4H), 7.00 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.23 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.30 (dd, 2H,  Hz,  Hz), 7.45 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.61 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.65-7.66 (m, 2H), 7.71 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.95 (d, 2H,  Hz), 8.64 (brs, 2H), and 10.67 (s, 2H); TOF-MS m/z: 683.1911 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₅H₃₀N₄O₁₁: 682.1877.

3.4.10. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(2-methoxy-4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)acetamide) 3j

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 216-217°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3390, 3246, 3019, 2921, 1669, 1618, 1589, 1510, 1469, 1338, 1253, 1142, 1098, 1033, 982, 852, and 771; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 2.13 (s, 12H), 3.87 (s, 6H), 4.80 (s, 4H), 7.04 (d, 8H,  Hz), 7.25 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.33 (dd, 2H,  Hz,  Hz), 7.45 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.70 (d, 2H,  Hz), and 9.42 (brs, 2H); TOF-MS m/z: 649.2836 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₉H₄₀N₂O₇: 648.2734.

3.4.11. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(2-methoxy-4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(4-chlorophenyl)acetamide) 3k

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 117–119°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3371, 2937, 1693, 1644, 1593, 1509, 1465, 1261, 1142, 1093, 1034, 978, 826, and 720; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 3.87 (s, 6H), 4.67 (s, 4H), 6.98 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.23 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.37 (d, 5H,  Hz), 7.44 (s, 3H), 7.64 (d, 4H,  Hz), and 7.68 (d, 2H,  Hz); TOF-MS m/z: 661.1430 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₅H₃₀Cl₂N₂O₇: 660.1375.

3.4.12. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis (4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-benzylacetamide) 3l

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 278-279°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3371, 3281, 2919, 1671, 1655, 1585, 1509, 1423, 1317, 1232, 1175, 1058, 988, 831, and 750; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 4.34 (d, 4H,  Hz), 4.62 (s, 2H), 7.04 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.19 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.22 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.23 (d, 3H,  Hz), 7.28 (d, 3H,  Hz), 7.30 (d, 1H,  Hz), 7.72 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.74 (d, 4H,  Hz), and 8.68 (t, 2H,  Hz); TOF-MS m/z: 561.2311 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₅H₃₂N₂O₅: 560.2456.

3.4.13. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene)) bis(oxy))bis(N-(4-methylbenzyl)acetamide) 3m

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 218–220°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3326, 3047, 2915, 2839, 1658, 1593, 1538, 1511, 1423, 1335, 1293, 1250, 1175, 1062, 1031, 982, 832, and 753; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 2.25 (s, 6H), 4.28 (d, 4H,  Hz), 4.60 (s, 4H), 7.03 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.09 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.12 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.19 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.72 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.74 (d, 2H,  Hz), and 8.62 (t, 2H,  Hz); TOF-MS m/z: 589.2624 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₇H₃₆N₂O₅: 588.2658.

3.4.14. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(4-methoxybenzyl)acetamide) 3n

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 255–257°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3326, 3037, 2915, 2839, 1658, 1598, 1538, 1511, 1423, 1335, 1293, 1250, 1176, 1113, 1062, 1031, 982, 832, and 753; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 3.70 (s, 6H), 4.26 (d, 4H,  Hz), 4.59 (s, 4H), 6.85 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.03 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.16 (d, 4H,  Hz), 7.19 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.71 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.73 (d, 4H,  Hz), and 8.60 (t, 2H,  Hz); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-, 100 MHz): 41.29, 55.02, 66.97, 113.63, 115.24, 123.85, 127.99, 128.62, 130.21, 131.19, 142.10, 158.21, 159.57, 167.26, and 188.21; TOF-MS m/z: 621.2523 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₇H₃₆N₂O₇: 620.2453.

3.4.15. -((((1E,4E)-3-Oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(2-methoxy-4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(4-methylbenzyl)acetamide) 3o

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 209–211°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3332, 3268, 3074, 2922, 2837, 1662, 1592, 1547, 1510, 1465, 1310, 1256, 1196, 1166, 1138, 1032, 978, 852, 801, 762; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz): 2.33 (s, 6H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 4.49 (d, 4H,  Hz), 4.62 (s, 4H), 6.92 (d, 2H,  Hz), 6.96 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.10 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.14 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.15 (d, 5H,  Hz), 7.18 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.21 (d, 3H,  Hz), 7.67 (d, 2H,  Hz); TOF-MS m/z: 649.2836 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₉H₄₀N₂O₇: 648.2759.

3.4.16. -((((1E,4E)-3-oxopenta-1,4-diene-1,5-diyl)bis(2-methoxy-4,1-phenylene))bis(oxy))bis(N-(4-methoxybenzyl) acetamide) 3p

Yield 87% (yellow solid); m.p. 167–169°C; IR (KBr film)  cm⁻¹: 3417, 3286, 3051, 2931, 2835, 1655, 1586, 1512, 1464, 1305, 1248, 1185, 1145, 1031, 972, 841, 080, and 768; ¹H NMR (DMSO-, 400 MHz): 3.71 (s, 6H), 3.84 (s, 6H), 4.26 (d, 4H,  Hz), 4.59 (s, 4H), 6.86 (d, 5H,  Hz), 6.96 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.17 (d, 5H,  Hz), 7.24 (d, 2H,  Hz), 7.29 (dd, 2H,  Hz,  Hz), 7.69 (d, 2H,  Hz), and 8.40 (t, 2H,  Hz); ¹³C NMR (DMSO-, 100 MHz): 41.39, 55.05, 55.73, 68.02, 111.12, 113.66, 113.92, 122.79, 124, 128.59, 128.68, 131.07, 142.46, 149.52, 158.26, 167.38, and 188.11; TOF-MS m/z: 681.2734 (M + 1), calculated for C₃₉H₄₀N₂O₉: 680.2652.

3.5. In Vitro Cytotoxicity

KBM5 and HCT116 were used for anticancer assay. The cytotoxic effect of C-5 curcumin analogues was determined by MTT assay [34]. Briefly, HCT116 and KBM5 cells ( cells/mL) were treated with 5 M of indicated test sample in a final volume of 0.1 mL at 37°C for 72 h. Thereafter, 1 mg/mL of MTT solution was added to the untreated/treated cells. After 2 h incubation at 37°C, 0.1 mL of the cell lysis buffer (20% SDS; 50% dimethylformamide; pH 4.7) was added. After an overnight incubation at 37°C, the OD at 590 nm were measured using a 96-well multiscanner autoreader (Dynatech MR 5000, Chantilly, VA), with the extraction buffer as a blank and reduction in viability as per treatment was calculated by comparing with untreated cells as control.

3.6. Assessment of Anti-Inflammatory Potential: Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay

To determine the anti-inflammatory potential of curcumin analogues, downmodulation in NF-κB activation was measured in untreated and treated KBM5 cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed with nuclear extract of treated-, untreated-, and induced-cells as described previously [35]. In brief, nuclear extracts prepared from cancer cells were incubated with ³²P end-labeled 45-mer double-stranded NF-B oligonucleotide (15 g of protein with 16 fmol of DNA) from the HIV long terminal repeat (5′-TTGTTACAAGGGACTTTC CGCTG GGGACTTTC CAGGGA GGCGT GG-3′, with NF-B-binding sites) for 30 min at 37°C. The resulting protein-DNA complex was separated from free oligonucleotides on 6.6% polyacrylamide gels. The dried gels were visualized by Phosphor-Imager imaging device (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA), and radioactive bands were quantified using Image Quant software.

4. Conclusion

These new curcumin analogues exhibited good potential to inhibit TNF--induced NF-B activation so they can be further optimised to get lead molecule with good anti-inflammatory activity. Some of these compounds also exhibited potent cytotoxicity against KBM5 and HCT116 cancer cell lines so further modifications of these molecules could be done to get a lead molecule for further studies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

Amit Anthwal and Bandana K. Thakur are thankful to UGC for research fellowship. M. S. M. Rawat thanks University Grants Commission (F4-10/2010 (BSR) dated March 7, 2012), New Delhi, India, for financial support.

References

G. M. Cragg, D. J. Newman, and K. M. Snader, “Natural products in drug discovery and development,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 60, pp. 52–60, 1997.

D. S. Rao, N. C. Sekhara, M. N. Satyanarayana, and M. Srinivasan, “Effect of curcumin on serum and liver cholesterol levels in the rat,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 1307–1315, 1970.

T. N. Patil and M. Srinivasan, “Hypocholesteremic effect of curcumin in induced hypercholesteremic rats,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 167–169, 1971.

K. Keshavarz, “The influence of turmeric and curcumin on cholesterol concentration of eggs and tissues,” Poultry Science, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1077–1083, 1976.

K. K. Soudamini, M. C. Unnikrishnan, K. B. Soni, and R. Kuttan, “Inhibition of lipid peroxidation and cholesterol levels in mice by curcumin,” Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 36, pp. 239–243, 1992.

K. B. Soni and R. Kuttan, “Effect of oral curcumin administration on serum peroxides and cholesterol levels in human volunteers,” Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 273–275, 1992.

M. S. Hussain and N. Chandrasekhara, “Effect of curcumin on cholesterol gallstone induction in mice,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 96, p. 288, 1992.

A. Asai and T. Miyazawa, “Dietary curcuminoids prevent high-fat diet-induced lipid accumulation in rat liver and epididymal adipose tissue,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 131, no. 11, pp. 2932–2935, 2001.

M. C. Ramírez-Tortosaemail, M. D. Mesa, M. C. Aguilera, et al., “Oral administration of a turmeric extract inhibits LDL oxidation and has hypocholesterolemic effects in rabbits with experimental atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 371–378, 1999.

K. A. Naidu and N. B. Thippeswamy, “Inhibition of human low density lipoprotein oxidation by active principles from spices,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 229, no. 1-2, pp. 19–23, 2002.

B. S. Patro, S. Rele, G. J. Chintalwar, S. Chattopadhyay, S. Adhikari, and T. Mukherjee, “Protective activities of some phenolic 1,3-diketones against lipid peroxidation: possible involvement of the 1,3-diketone moiety,” ChemBioChem, vol. 3, p. 364, 2002.

R. Srivastava, V. Puri, R. C. Srimal, and B. N. Dhawan, “Effect of curcumin on platelet aggregation and vascular prostacyclin synthesis,” Arzneimittelforschung, vol. 36, pp. 715–717, 1986.

P. Anand, C. Sundaram, S. Jhurani, A. B. Kunnumakkara, and B. B. Aggarwal, “Curcumin and cancer: an “old-age” disease with an, age-old , solution,” Cancer letters, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 133–164, 2008.

A. B. Kunnumakkara, P. Anand, and B. B. Aggarwal, “Curcumin inhibits proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis of different cancers through interaction with multiple cell signaling proteins,” Cancer Letters, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 199–225, 2008.

B. B. Aggarwal, A. B. Kunnumakkara, K. B. Harikumar, S. T. Tharakan, B. Sung, and P. Anand, “Potential of spice-derived phytochemicals for cancer prevention,” Planta Medica, vol. 74, p. 1560, 2008.

B. B. Aggarwal, A. Kumar, and A. C. Bharti, “Anticancer potential of curcumin: preclinical and clinical studies,” Anticancer Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 363–398, 2003.

A. Goel, A. B. Kunnumakkara, and B. B. Aggarwal, “Curcumin as “Curecumin”: from kitchen to clinic,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 787–809, 2008.

G. Liang, X. Li, L. Chen et al., “Synthesis and anti-inflammatory activities of monocarbonyl analogues of curcumin,” Bioorganic Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1525–1529, 2008.

S. Prasad, A. K. Tyagi, and B. B. Aggarwal, “Recent developments in delivery, bioavailability, absorption and metabolism of curcumin: the golden pigment from golden spice,” Cancer Research Treatment, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 2–18, 2014.

M. H. Pan, T. M. Huang, and J. K. Lin, “Biotransformation of curcumin through reduction and glucuronidation in mice,” Drug Metabolism & Disposition, vol. 27, pp. 486–494, 1999.

C. R. Ireson, D. J. Jones, S. Orr et al., “Metabolism of the cancer chemopreventive agent curcumin in human and rat intestine,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 2002.

E. Pfeiffer, S. I. Hoehle, S. G. Walch, A. Riess, A. M. Solyom, and M. Metzler, “Curcuminoids form reactive glucuronides in vitro,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 55, pp. 538–544, 2007.

T. P. Robinson, T. Ehlers, R. B. Hubbard, et al., “Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of angiogenesis inhibitors: aromatic enone and dienone analogues of curcumin,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 115–117, 2003.

H. Ohtsu, Z. Xiao, J. Ishida, M. Nagai, H. K. Wang, and H. Itokawa, “Antitumor agents. 217. Curcumin analogues as novel androgen receptor antagonists with potential as anti-prostate cancer agents,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 45, pp. 5037–5042, 2002.

G. Liang, L. Shao, Y. Wang et al., “Exploration and synthesis of curcumin analogues with improved structural stability both in vitro and in vivo as cytotoxic agents,” Bioorganic Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 17, pp. 2623–2631, 2009.

H. Yamakoshi, H. Ohori, C. Kudo et al., “Structureactivity relationship of C5-curcuminoids and synthesis of their molecular probes thereof,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1083–1092, 2010.

A. Anthwal, U. C. Rajesh, M. S. M. Rawat et al., “Novel metronidazole-chalcone conjugates with potential to counter drug resistance in Trichomonas vaginalis,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 79, pp. 89–94, 2014.

A. Parvez, J. Meshram, V. Tiwari et al., “Pharmacophores modeling in terms of prediction of theoretical physico-chemical properties and veriﬁcation by experimental correlations of novel coumarin derivatives produced via Betti’s protocol,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 4370–4378, 2010.

A. Parvez, M. Jyotsna, and B. H. Taibi, “Theoretical prediction and experimental verification of antibacterial potential of some monocyclic β-lactams containing two synergetic buried antibacterial pharmacophore sites,” Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Silicon and the Related Elements, vol. 185, pp. 1–11, 2010.

http://www.molinspiration.com/

http://www.osiris.com

L. C. W. Chang, R. F. Spanjersberg, M. W. Beukers, and A. P. Ijzerman, “2,4,6-Trisubstituted pyrimidines as a new class of selective adenosine A-1 receptor antagonists,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 47, pp. 6529–6540, 2004.

D. E. Clark, “Rapid calculation of polar molecular surface area and its application to the prediction of transport phenomena,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 807–814, 1999.

V. Haridas, B. G. Darnay, K. Natarajan, R. Heller, and B. B. Aggarwal, “Overexpression of the p80 TNF receptor leads to TNF-dependent apoptosis, nuclear factor-kappa B activation, and c-Jun kinase activation,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, p. 3152, 1998.

M. M. Chaturvedi, A. Mukhopadhyay, and B. B. Aggarwal, “Assay for redox-sensitive transcription factor,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 319, pp. 585–602, 2000.