RETRACTED

BioMed Research International has retracted the article titled “Disturbances of Sperm Maturation and Minipuberty: Is There a Connection?” [1] as it was found to contain a substantial amount of material from previously published articles [2–5], particularly in sections 1, 2 and 3.

(i)J. Toppari, J. C. Larsen, P. Christiansen et al., “Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 741–803, 1996(ii)Anawalt, Bradley D. “The silent spermatozoon: are man-made endocrine disruptors killing male fertility?”, Asian Journal of Andrology, 2013. Volume 15, Issue 2 (March 2013) 15, 165–168; doi:10.1038/aja.2012.148(iii)Mahmoud, Huleihel. “Concise Review: Spermatogenesis in an Artificial Three-Dimensional System”, Stem Cells.Volume 30, Issue 11, November 2012, Pages 2355-2360. doi:10.1002/stem.1238(iv)Thorup, Jorgen et al. “What is new in cryptorchidism and hypospadias—a critical review on the testicular dysgenesis hypothesis”, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Volume 45, Issue 10, 2074 – 2086. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.07.030

BioMed Research International

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 912746, 4 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/912746

Review Article

Disturbances of Sperm Maturation and Minipuberty: Is There a Connection?

D. Živković1,2 and I. Fratrić¹

¹Institute for Child and Youth Health Care of Vojvodina, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia

²Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia

Received 6 January 2014; Accepted 7 February 2014; Published 13 March 2014

Academic Editor: Nicola Bernabò

Copyright © 2014 D. Živković and I. Fratrić. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Male reproductive function in the general population raises an increased attention due to reports indicating declining sperm counts, increased occurrence of testicular cancer, cryptorchidism, and hypospadias. It is also hypothesized that prolonged exposure of the developing male, during both fetal and postnatal life, to exogenous estrogens could reduce Sertoli cell number and thus reduce sperm output (and sperm counts) in adult life. Fact is that infertility, which is defined as the inability to conceive after 1 year of unprotected intercourse, has a global prevalence of 9%. A male contributory factor is involved in approximately half of these cases, but most of the causes of reduced semen quality and other disturbances of male reproductive function are unknown. In the most affected men (azoospermic men) 15–20% had a prior history of cryptorchidism. The association between the cryptorchidism and infertility is one of the most studied potential causes of infertility. There are numerous studies that accentuate the importance of minipuberty for future fertility. Is it possible that a normal minipuberty ensures normal fertility despite malpositioned testes? And to move away from cryptorchidism, could impaired minipuberty be responsible for fertility problems in men who were born with both testes in their scrotal sacs?

1. Spermatogenesis

Spermatogenesis is a highly specialized process of cellular differentiation in which diploid progenitor cells of the testis differentiate into haploid spermatozoa. It begins with a differentiating cell division of diploid spermatogonial stem cells and continues with sequential cell divisions of spermatogonia and meiosis of spermatocytes to form round spermatids [1]. Successful differentiation of round spermatids into the complex structure of the spermatozoon is called spermiogenesis.

In humans, two morphologically distinguishable types of differentiated spermatogonia exist, called Ad (dark) and Ap (pale). Ad spermatogonia exhibit characteristics consistent with their identification as testicular stem cells, while the Ap spermatogonia exhibit characteristics of a progenitor cell [2].

Spermatogenesis occurs in the seminiferous tubules of the testis and relies on the appropriate expansion of undifferentiated and differentiated spermatogonia prior to the entry of germ cells into meiosis and subsequent spermiogenesis [3]. The process of spermatogenesis is under the general control of the endocrine system, and locally by a variety of direct and indirect interactions and signals between the developing germ cells and the surrounding microenvironment via autocrine/paracrine factors [4].

2. Testicular Dysgenesis Syndrome

Male reproductive function in the general population raises an increased attention due to reports indicating declining sperm counts [5, 6], increased occurrence of testicular cancer, cryptorchidism, and hypospadias [7, 8].

Some authors have hypothesized that these entities (declining semen quality, testicular cancer, cryptorchidism, and hypospadias) are symptoms of one underlying entity—the so-called testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) [9]. They have suggested that an imbalance between estrogens and androgens during fetal life may be crucial. Initially, the estrogen hypothesis argued that increase of reproductive abnormalities in human males may be related to increased estrogen exposure in utero [10]. This hypothesis has been expanded to include endocrine disruptors, which include environmental toxins that can disrupt the hormonal balance of the fetus and thereby disturb sexual differentiation either by an estrogenic or an antiandrogenic effect [11].

3. Endocrine Disruptors

Reports on various experimental animals (e.g., sheep, rats, and mice) describe how exposure to exogenous estrogens during the neonatal period causes drastic reductions in the secretion of FSH from the pituitary gland and the presumption is that similar effects would occur before birth [12]. As FSH plays a vital role in controlling multiplication of Sertoli cells at this time [12] the prediction would be that estrogen-induced suppression of FSH levels would lead to a slower rate of Sertoli cell multiplication. As the number of Sertoli cells formed in fetal/neonatal life is an important factor influencing the maximum level of sperm production in adult life, the consequences of such a change in terms of sperm counts is obvious; moreover, such an effect is irreversible once Sertoli cell multiplication stops in early postnatal life. There is abundant evidence from man (hypogonadotropic hypogonadism) and from animal species that suppression of FSH levels in early postnatal life results in just such changes [13]. Recent evidence from the fetal sheep [14] also shows that suppression of FSH secretion in the fetal male during the second half of gestation results at birth in testes that contain 40% fewer Sertoli cells than occurs in control animals.

It is therefore hypothesized that prolonged exposure of the developing male, during both fetal and postnatal life, to exogenous estrogens (perhaps even at low levels) could reduce Sertoli cell number and thus reduce sperm output (and sperm counts) in adult life. Experiments involving exposure of rats to various xenoestrogens during the period of Sertoli cell multiplication have shown that in adult life such exposure results in small (8–12%) but highly significant reductions in testis size and a corresponding decrease in daily sperm production [15]. These effects have been achieved after exposure to relatively low levels of the chemicals (alkylphenols, phthalates; 1 mg/liter in drinking water of pregnant rats) under test. For example, butylbenzyl phthalate has been found to occur in butter and margarine at concentrations as high as 47.8 mg/kg [16]. Such findings suggest that there is the theoretical possibility that human exposure to such chemicals might have contributed to the decline in sperm counts in men described earlier.

After reading all the facts it is logical to conclude that the sperm quality is declining, and the disruptors are to blame. But is it really so? The Carlson meta-analysis, from which the declining sperm quality hypothesis started, was criticized subsequently for many methodological flaws. However, their controversial meta-analysis and hypothesis spurred public and scientific interest in the study of male reproductive function and stimulated more rigorous scientific work in the area. Subsequent research has not convincingly supported their hypothesis. There are few convincing data that men have become less capable of reproducing during the last century. In 1992, the world population was about 5.5 billion. In 2012, the world population exceeded 7 billion [17]. Most of this population increase occurred in poorer, densely populated countries where industrial effluent is poorly regulated or unregulated. For example, the Ganges delta region in India and Bangladesh has a rapidly growing population and is one of the most densely populated areas of the world. The Ganges River and its tributaries contain some of the most polluted water in the world. These pollutants include a variety of industrial solvents and by-products including biphenyls and other compounds postulated to be estrogenic endocrine disruptors [18, 19]. The substantial increase in world population, particularly in regions exposed to high concentrations of potential estrogenic pollutants, argues strongly against a deleterious effect of these pollutants on male fertility.

In humans, it is clear that in utero exposure to certain endocrine disruptors has significant adverse effects. The most famous example of a human endocrine disruptor is diethylstilbestrol, a synthetic estrogen that was used to treat nausea during the first trimester of pregnancy. Diethylstilbestrol has been associated with increased reproductive tract abnormalities in boys and vaginal adenocarcinoma in girls exposed to the drug in utero [20]. However, diethylstilbestrol was a drug administered to pregnant women. The data linking specific environmental pollutants and contaminants to reproductive tract abnormalities are tenuous. In the 2009 Endocrine Society Scientific Statement on Endocrine Disruptors, the authors list several compounds with estrogenic activity that might cause male reproductive tract disorders (including cryptorchidism, testicular cancer, and decreased spermatogenesis), but they acknowledge that the epidemiological data relating male reproductive tract disorders to environmental disruptors are indirect and that there is no direct evidence of endocrine disruptors’ involvement in the pathogenesis of male reproductive tract disorders in men [19].

4. Minipuberty

Fact is that infertility, which is defined as the inability to conceive after 1 year of unprotected intercourse, has a global prevalence of 9% [21]. A male contributory factor is involved in approximately half of these cases [22], but most of the causes of reduced semen quality and other disturbances of male reproductive function are unknown [23]. In the most affected men (azoospermic men) 15–20% had a prior history of cryptorchidism [24]. The association between the cryptorchidism and infertility is one of the most studied potential causes of infertility. Even though it has been studied by many researches for many years many things are still quite unclear. It has been shown that two-thirds of patients with bilateral cryptorchidism and a third of patients with unilateral cryptorchidism [25] have problems with fertility. Why some of the patients with cryptorchidism are subfertile and others are not is still a mystery. Some answers have been found. For example it has been shown that “minipuberty” is a window of time in life of utmost importance for future fertility. The hypothalamic—pituitary—gonadal axis is transiently activated during the first months of postnatal life. In the healthy male infant gonadotropins, sex steroids and inhibin B increase to pubertal or even adult levels at 3 months of age, followed by a relatively quiescent period until reactivation of the hypothalamic—pituitary—gonadal axis in puberty [26–28]. The elevated inhibin B persists for a longer period of time than the elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and testosterone [29]. The initial activation of the HPG axis is believed to be important for genital development, including renewal and differentiation of the germ cells. Patients with cryptorchidism have smaller increase in testosterone level compared to healthy boys [26]. Problems with fertility are not related to the testicular position, since some patients have fertility problems in adulthood even after a successful surgery at an early age [30]. Disturbed “minipuberty” could be responsible for future fertility problems, as it has been shown that cryptorchid patients with similar testicular position, timing of surgery, and testicular histology have different sperm counts depending on whether they received postoperative hormonal support or not [31]. There are clearly two subgroups of cryptorchid boys. Those with a sufficient Leydig cell secretory capacity have near normal testicular histology (present Ad spermatogonia) at the time of surgery, and they are not expected to have problems with fertility [32]. Those with a suboptimal Leydig cell secretory capacity have low Ad spermatogonia count at the time of surgery, and consequently poor prognosis for future fertility, despite successful surgery [33]. For now there is no precise way to noninvasively determine to which group a patient belongs. Testicular biopsy is the only diagnostic procedure capable of identifying patients who need to be treated with LH-RH analogue following successful orchidopexy and should therefore be routinely performed during the surgery. Ad spermatogonia proved to be a discriminating factor with respect to the fertility outcome [34]. The presence of Ad spermatogonia in the undescended testis influences the levels of FSH, and in patients with unilateral cryptorchidism the presence of Ad spermatogonia in the contralateral descended testis is a dominant predictor for the fertility outcome, since in boys with unilateral cryptorchidism, testicular pathology caused by hormonal imbalance is bilateral; 71% of scrotal testes have a reduced number of germ cells and 75% have impaired gonocytes transformation into Ad spermatogonia [34].

5. Conclusion

All of the above findings accentuate the importance of minipuberty for future fertility. Is it possible that a normal minipuberty ensures normal fertility despite malpositioned testes? And to move away from cryptorchidism, could impaired minipuberty be responsible for fertility problems in men who were born with both testes in their scrotal sacs? Many different opinions have been addressed in this review. The aim of it is not to show what is right, but to awake a curiosity in as many researchers dealing with male fertility, sex hormones, and cryptorchidism to continue to study these problems with a mind as wide open as possible.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This review is a part of the project funded by the Provincial Secretary for Science and Technology of Vojvodina (114-451-2646) and Ministry for Science and Technology (iii 41012).

References

D. M. de Kretser, K. L. Loveland, A. Meinhardt, D. Simorangkir, and N. Wreford, “Spermatogenesis,” Human Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1998.

F. Hadziselimovic and B. Herzog, “Importance of early postnatal germ cell maturation for fertility of cryptorchid males,” Hormone Research, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 6–10, 2001.

J. Ehmcke, J. Wistuba, and S. Schlatt, “Spermatogonial stem cells: questions, models and perspectives,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 275–282, 2006.

N. Soffikitis, E. Pappas, A. Kawatani et al., “Efforts to create an artificial testis: culture systems of male germ cells under biochemical conditions resembling the seminiferous tubular biochemical environment,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 229–259, 2005.

E. Carlsen, A. Giwercman, N. Keiding, and N. E. Skakkebæk, “Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years,” British Medical Journal, vol. 305, no. 6854, pp. 609–613, 1992.

J. Auger, J. M. Kunstmann, F. Czyglik, and P. Jouannet, “Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 332, no. 5, pp. 281–285, 1995.

E. Huyghe, T. Matsuda, and P. Thonneau, “Increasing incidence of testicular cancer worldwide: a review,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 2003.

N. Kurahashi, S. Kasai, Y. Saijo, F. Sata, and R. Kishi, “Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and human health: a review of epidemiological studies focused on hypospadias and cryptorchidism,” Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2005.

N. E. Skakkebæk, E. Rajpert-de Meyts, and K. M. Main, “Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects,” Human Reproduction, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 972–978, 2001.

R. M. Sharpe and N. E. Skakkebæk, “Are oestrogens involved in falling sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract?” The Lancet, vol. 341, no. 8857, pp. 1392–1395, 1993.

J. Toppari, J. C. Larsen, P. Christiansen et al., “Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 741–803, 1996.

R. M. Sharpe, “Declining sperm count in men—is there an endocrine cause?” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 357–360, 1993.

R. M. Sharpe, “Regulation of spermatogenesis,” in The Physiology of Reproduction, E. Knobil and J. D. Neill, Eds., pp. 1–72, Raven Press, New York, NY, USA, 1994.

G. B. Thomas, A. S. McNeilly, F. Gibson, and A. N. Brooks, “Effects of pituitary-gonadal suppression with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist on fetal gonadotrophin secretion, fetal gonadal development and maternal steroid secretion in the sheep,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 317–324, 1994.

R. M. Sharpe, J. S. Fisher, M. M. Millar, S. Jobling, and J. P. Sumpter, “Gestational and lactational exposure of rats to xenoestrogens results in reduced testicular size and sperm production,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 103, no. 12, pp. 1136–1143, 1995.

M. Sharman, W. A. Read, L. Castle, and J. Gilbert, “Levels of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and total phthalate esters in milk, cream, butter and cheese,” Food Additives and Contaminants, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 375–385, 1994.

D. E. Bloom, “7 billion and counting,” Science, vol. 333, no. 6042, pp. 562–569, 2011.

K. Senthilkumar, K. Kannan, R. K. Sinha, S. Tanabe, and J. P. Giesy, “Bioaccumulation profiles of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners and organochlorine pesticides in Ganges river dolphins,” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1511–1520, 1999.

E. Diamanti-Kandarakis, J.-P. Bourguignon, L. C. Giudice et al., “Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 293–342, 2009.

A. L. Herbst, H. Ulfelder, and D. C. Poskanzer, “Adenocarcinoma of the vagina. Association of maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumor appearance in young women,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 284, no. 15, pp. 878–881, 1971.

J. Boivin, L. Bunting, J. A. Collins, and K. G. Nygren, “International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care,” Human Reproduction, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1506–1512, 2007.

D. S. Irvine, “Epidemiology and aetiology of male infertility,” Human Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 33–44, 1998.

N. E. Skakkebæk, A. Giwercman, and D. de Kretser, “Pathogenesis and management of male infertility,” The Lancet, vol. 343, no. 8911, pp. 1473–1479, 1994.

G. Robin, F. Boitrelle, F. Marcelli et al., “Cryptorchidism: from physiopathology to infertility,” Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 588–599, 2010.

D. Cortes, J. M. Thorup, and J. Visfeldt, “Cryptorchidism: aspects of fertility and neoplasms. A study including data of 1,335 consecutive boys who underwent testicular biopsy simultaneously with surgery for cryptorchidism,” Hormone Research, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2001.

M. G. Forest, P. C. Sizonenko, A. M. Cathiard, and J. Bertrand, “Hypophyso gonadal function in humans during the first year of life—I. Evidence for testicular activity in early infancy,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 819–828, 1974.

J. S. D. Winter, I. A. Hughes, F. I. Reyes, and C. Faiman, “Pituitary-gonadal relations in infancy—II. Patterns of serum gonadal steroid concentrations in man from birth to two years of age,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 679–686, 1976.

P. Corbier, D. A. Edwards, and J. Roffi, “The neonatal testosterone surge: a comparative study,” Archives Internationales de Physiologie, de Biochimie et de Biophysique, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 127–131, 1992.

A.-M. Andersson, J. Toppari, A.-M. Haavisto et al., “Longitudinal reproductive hormone profiles in infants: peak of inhibin B levels in infant boys exceeds levels in adult men,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 675–681, 1998.

P. M. Crofton, A. E. M. Evans, N. P. Groome, M. R. H. Taylor, C. V. Holland, and C. J. H. Kelnar, “Inhibin B in boys from birth to adulthood: relationship with age, pubertal stage, FSH and testosterone,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 215–221, 2002.

F. Hadziselimovic, “Early successful orchidopexy does not prevent from developing azoospermia,” International Brazilian Journal of Urology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 570–573, 2006.

F. Hadziselimovic, “Successful treatment of unilateral cryptorchid boys risking infertility with LH-RH analogue,” International Brazilian Journal of Urology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 319–326, 2008.

D. Zivkovic, D. T. G. Bica, and F. Hadziselimovic, “Relationship between adult dark spermatogonia and secretory capacity of Leydig cells in cryptorchidism,” British Journal of Urology International, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 1147–1149, 2007.

F. Hadziselimovic and B. Hoecht, “Testicular histology related to fertility outcome and postpubertal hormone status in cryptorchidism,” Klinische Padiatrie, vol. 220, no. 5, pp. 302–307, 2008.