BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 3818945, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3818945

Research Article

In Vitro Antimicrobial Bioassays, DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity, and FTIR Spectroscopy Analysis of Heliotropium bacciferum

Sohail Ahmad,¹ Naser M. AbdEl-Salam,² and Riaz Ullah³

¹Department of Chemistry, Qurtuba University of Science and Information Technology Peshawar, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan
²Riyadh Community College, King Saud University, Riyadh 11437, Saudi Arabia
³Department of Chemistry, Government College Ara Khel, FR Kohat 26000, Pakistan

Received 17 March 2016; Revised 1 June 2016; Accepted 10 July 2016

Academic Editor: Roya Dastjerdi

Copyright © 2016 Sohail Ahmad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The present study deals with the antimicrobial, antioxidant, and functional group analysis of Heliotropium bacciferum extracts. Disc diffusion susceptibility method was followed for antimicrobial assessment. Noteworthy antimicrobial activities were recorded by various plant extracts against antibiotic resistant microorganisms. Plant flower extracts antioxidant activity was investigated against 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl radical by ultraviolet spectrophotometer (517 nm). Plant extracts displayed noteworthy radical scavenging activities at all concentrations (25–225 μg/mL). Notable activities were recorded by crude, chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts up to 88.27% at 225 μg/mL concentration. Compounds functional groups were examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic studies. Alkanes, alkenes, alkyl halides, amines, carboxylic acids, amides, esters, alcohols, phenols, nitrocompounds, and aromatic compounds were identified by FTIR analysis. Thin layer chromatography bioautography was carried out for all plant extracts. Different bands were separated by various solvent systems. The results of the current study justify the use of Heliotropium bacciferum in traditional remedial herbal medicines.

1. Introduction

Plants are the foremost sources of traditional medicines with a huge variety of bioactive components, which are effective against various diseases. Plants biological activities are attributed to these bioactive components. Medicinal plants which are the rich sources of antifungal and antibacterial agents are used as basis of effective beneficial drugs in many countries [1]. Fungi, bacteria, viruses, and other microorganisms are potentially pathogenic to humans and animals. Worldwide, antibiotic resistant bacteria epidemics have been reported in hospitals. Therefore, discovery of novel antimicrobial agents to fight such diseases becomes very significant and indispensable [2]. Medicinal plants are the richest sources of these microbial agents. In traditional systems of modern medicines, plants are the richest resources of drugs, food supplements, folk medicines, nutraceuticals, and chemical permitted for synthetic drugs. Plant potential as source of novel drugs is still largely unfamiliar. In phytochemical perspective, only a slight percentage of plant has been explored [3]. Worldwide, antimicrobial agent’s resistance has amplified and caused considerable mortality and morbidity. Bacteria have genetic capability to transmit and gain resistance to therapeutically active drugs. In developing countries, elevated cost of drug treatment has contributed to eminent frequency of opportunistic and chronic diseases. To manage these infections, there is an essential search for novel agents with less toxicity and larger antibacterial activity [4–7]. Heliotropium genus belongs to Boraginaceae family consists of about 100 genera and 2000 species [8]. Flavonoids and polyphenols distribution in Boraginaceae family has different pharmaceutical activities such as antibacterial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and hepatoprotecting [9]. Heliotropium bacciferum is a potent source of various phytochemicals and reported significant Diphenyl picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activities [10]. It is a wealthy source of pyrrolizidine alkaloids, which have antimicrobial, antihyperlipidemic, antidiabetic, and antitumor properties [11]. Previously reported study revealed that the aerial parts of Heliotropium bacciferum have significant antibacterial and antifungal effects. All tested plant extracts exhibited significant activities against different bacterial and fungal strains. The result against various microorganisms divulged the curative potential of the plant Heliotropium bacciferum [12].

There is no reported data on the antimicrobial activities of individual parts of the plant. Therefore, the present research was designed to screen the antibacterial, antifungal (leaves, flowers, and stem), and antioxidant (flower) assays of Heliotropium bacciferum extracts. Investigation of bioactive compounds functional groups and thin layer chromatography bioautography was also the key focus of the present study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Collection and Authentication

Heliotropium bacciferum was collected from Karak, KPK, Pakistan. Sample washing and cleansing were accomplished by deionized water for further processing. Plant parts (leaves, flowers, and stem) were separated, dried at room temperature, and crushed into coarse powder. Herbarium staff of Plant Sciences, University of Peshawar, authenticates the plant species and kept the plant species in the laboratory for further processing.

2.2. Chemicals and Reagents

Analytical and HPLC grade chemicals and reagents were used for experimental screening. Methanol, n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol were used for plant constituent’s extraction. Solvent purification was accomplished by dehydrating agents (Na₂SO₄ and MgSO₄).

2.3. Plant Extraction and Fractionation

Plant parts, that is, leaves, flowers, and stem, were shade dried and pulverized into powder form. Maceration was carried out in methanol (CH₃OH) for two weeks by Rehman et al. [13] methodology. Crude methanol extract of plant leaves (95 g), flowers (83 g), and stem (78 g) was suspended in distilled water (500 mL) and portioned in sequence with n-hexane (30 g, 22 g, and 18 g), chloroform (28 g, 25 g, and 20 g), ethyl acetate (34 g, 26 g, and 20 g), and n-butanol (31 g, 24 g, and 17 g), respectively.

2.4. Antibacterial Assay

Antibacterial assay of leaves, flowers, and stem extracts of Heliotropium bacciferum was investigated by disc diffusion susceptibility method [14]. Seven bacterial species, that is, Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538), Bacillus cereus (ATCC 7722), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 9721), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 6824), Proteus mirabilis (ATCC 7103), and Erwinia carotovora (ATCC 8452) were used for antibacterial bioassay. The solvents used for antibacterial evaluation were purified by dehydrating agents such as Na₂SO₄ and MgSO₄. Fractional distillation was also carried out for further solvent purification. Plant extract stock solutions (1 mg/mL) were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Nutrient agar media (2.8 g/100 mL) were used for microbe’s culturing and growth, while nutrient broth (1.3 g/100 mL) was used for microorganism’s standardization. Standardized microbial cultures (50 μL) with glass spreader were inoculated on each nutrient agar plate in a laminar flow hood for microbial growth and incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. The first streaked cultures were inoculated and incubated again. The second streaked microbial cultures were inoculated in nutrient broth (20–25 mL) and incubated for 18 hrs at 37°C in shaking water bath (200 rpm). Sterilized nutrient broth dilution was accomplished for standardization of microbial cultures and compared with 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard. Whatman filter paper discs (5 mm in diameter) were placed on solidified agar media with the help of sterilized forceps. Plant extracts (15 μg/disc) of leaves, flower, and stem were applied to media plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. As negative control, DMSO (5%) was used, while ampicillin antibiotic (8 μg/disc) was used as a positive control. The zone of inhibition (mm) was then measured for each plant extract.

2.5. Antifungal Assay

Agar well diffusion technique was used for the assessment of antifungal bioassay. Five fungal strains, that is, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus, Aspergillus oryzae, and Aspergillus fumigatus, were used for this activity. Fungal strains were cultured on Sabouraud’s dextrose agar (SDA) media for 3–5 days at 28°C. Nutrient broth media (28 g/1000 mL) were prepared in distilled water for the refreshment of fungal strains. Sterilized SDA plates were taken and 6 mm diameter sterile cork borer was used to bore wells in the agar media. Plant extracts (15 μg/well) were then added into each well. Plates were allowed to stand for 1 hour at 37°C for extract diffusion into agar and incubated at 28°C for 24 hrs. DMSO (5%) was taken as negative control, while clotrimazole antibiotic (8 μg/well) was used as positive control. The zone of inhibition (mm) was then measured for each plant extract.

2.6. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

Antioxidant activity of plant flower extracts was investigated against 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl radical by ultraviolet spectrophotometer (517 nm). The methodology of Ahmad et al. [10] was used for the activity. Plant extracts stock solution (1000 mg/mL) was prepared and diluted (25, 75, 125, 175, and 225 μg/mL) with the respective solvents. Ascorbic acid was used as control for comparison. The same five dilutions were also prepared for control. DPPH solution was prepared at concentration of 0.003 g/100 mL. All plant extracts were then treated with DPPH solution. Spectrophotometer was used for absorbance calculation at 517 nm after 30 mints. Absorbance decline by DPPH solution was used as an indication for high antioxidant activity. The percent antioxidant activity was calculated by the given formula:

2.7. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Functional groups and types of chemical bonds present in phytochemicals are identified by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis. Light absorbed wavelength is the prominent aspect of chemicals bonds, which can be seen through interpreted spectrum. Compound chemical bonds can be deduced via absorption infrared spectrum. Heliotropium bacciferum extracts (8 mg) were directed for FTIR assessment. Each plant extract (8 mg) was loaded to Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer for functional group analysis. Functional group analysis was accomplished by Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (IRTracer-100, Shimadzu, Japan). Minute quantity of Heliotropium bacciferum flower extracts were placed on sample holder of FTIR at constant pressure. The IR peaks absorbance (wave number, cm⁻¹) was recorded in the range of 4000 cm⁻¹ to 400 cm⁻¹.

2.8. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) Bioautography

Thin layer chromatography bioautography was accomplished by using EMW (ethyl acetate : methanol : water) (40 : 6 : 5), CEF (chloroform : ethyl acetate : formic acid) (9 : 7 : 2), and BEA (benzene/ethanol/ammonium hydroxide) (16 : 4 : 2) solvent systems of all plant extracts. Different bands were separated at various solvent systems. Ultraviolet light (305 and 368 nm) was used for the screening of those bands which were not visible in day light on TLC plates. Plant extracts (8 mg/mL) were applied on TLC plates in a fine band. Elution of these extracts was accomplished by three various solvent systems. For traces of removal of solvents, TLC plates were dried for five days under swift moving air. Bacterial new grown cultures were added on Mueller-Hinton broth. Bacterial strains densities used for Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Erwinia carotovora were approximately 3 × 10², 2 × 10⁴, 2 × 10⁷, 3 × 10³, 2 × 10⁵, 3 × 10⁶, and 2 × 10² cfu per milliliter, respectively. Freshly cultured fungal strains were added to Sabouraud dextrose broth. Fungal strains densities used for Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus, Aspergillus oryzae, and Aspergillus fumigatus were about 5 × 10⁵, 3 × 10⁴, 3 × 10⁶, 2 × 10³, and 2 × 10⁵ cells per milliliter, respectively. Bacterial and fungal suspensions were sprayed on TLC chromatograms. Laminar flow hood was used for bacterial processing and biosafety cabinet was used for fungal processing. TLC plates were then kept in dark (100% relative humidity) at 35°C for a night. The plates were sprayed with p-iodonitrotetrazolium (2 mg/mL) violet and incubated overnight.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All values were presented as the mean ± standard error of mean and analyzed for Two-Way ANOVA and One-Way ANOVA. Statistical analysis was carried out on GraphPad PRISM 6.

3. Results

3.1. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of Heliotropium bacciferum leaves, flowers, and stem extracts was recorded against various microorganisms. All plant extracts exhibit a range of inhibitory potentials (Table 1). Methanol, n-hexane, and ethyl acetate extracts of plant leaves (15 μg) revealed significant activities ( mm,  mm, and  mm) against Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus ( mm,  mm, and  mm), Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( mm,  mm, and  mm), and Escherichia coli ( mm,  mm, and  mm), respectively. Plant leaves chloroform and n-butanol extracts (15 μg) were active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( mm and  mm) and Klebsiella pneumoniae ( mm and  mm) and were completely inactive against Staphylococcus aureus and Erwinia carotovora. Plant flowers n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol extracts (15 μg) showed prominent activities against Escherichia coli ( mm,  mm, and  mm), Staphylococcus aureus ( mm,  mm, and  mm), and Klebsiella pneumoniae ( mm,  mm, and  mm), respectively. Chloroform and n-butanol extracts (15 μg) of plant stem showed noteworthy activities ( mm and  mm) against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia ( mm and  mm), respectively. Aqueous extracts (15 μg) of plant stem were active against Klebsiella pneumoniae ( mm), Proteus mirabilis ( mm), and Erwinia carotovora ( mm). Ethyl acetate and n-hexane extracts (15 μg) of plant stem were active against all bacterial microorganisms and revealed prominent activities in the range of 11–18 mm (Table 1).

Table 1: Antibacterial activity of all extracts of Heliotropium bacciferum.

Plant parts
Plant extracts (µg)
Zone of inhibition (mm) ± standard error mean
St. dev

Tested bacterial strains

EC
SA
BC
PA
KP
PM
ECA

Leaves
Methanol
13 ± 0.32
16 ± 0.51
15 ± 0.39
16 ± 0.44
18 ± 0.46
12 ± 0.62
17 ± 0.35
2.138

n-Hexane
19 ± 0.46
17 ± 0.34
14 ± 0.53
17 ± 0.58
20 ± 0.71
14 ± 0.34
15 ± 0.34
2.370

Chloroform
14 ± 0.29
R
12 ± 0.62
16 ± 0.37
17 ± 0.73
13 ± 0.45
R
3.988

Ethyl acetate
18 ± 0.65
19 ± 0.53
13 ± 0.53
15 ± 0.53
21 ± 0.69
12 ± 0.56
14 ± 0.67
3.367

n-Butanol
13 ± 0.36
R
11 ± 0.38
14 ± 0.75
10 ± 0.28
9 ± 0.44
R
2.734

Aqueous
10 ± 0.72
R
R
R
11 ± 0.39
10 ± 0.29
13 ± 0.46
2.360

Flowers
Methanol
15 ± 0.53
13 ± 0.33
12 ± 0.27
17 ± 0.54
18 ± 0.73
14 ± 0.55
12 ± 0.43
2.370

n-Hexane
17 ± 0.46
19 ± 0.76
15 ± 0.63
18 ± 0.66
19 ± 0.75
13 ± 0.34
15 ± 0.55
2.299

Chloroform
13 ± 0.42
10 ± 0.64
14 ± 0.52
13 ± 0.43
16 ± 0.64
12 ± 0.47
R
2.911

Ethyl acetate
16 ± 0.64
20 ± 0.74
15 ± 0.62
13 ± 0.67
19 ± 0.48
14 ± 0.69
12 ± 0.31
2.992

n-Butanol
14 ± 0.34
11 ± 0.54
R
15 ± 0.27
13 ± 0.46
R
11 ± 0.36
3.185

Aqueous
12 ± 0.45
10 ± 0.27
R
R
10 ± 0.52
9 ± 0.24
13 ± 0.54
2.289

Stem
Methanol
12 ± 0.46
15 ± 0.63
13 ± 0.74
14 ± 0.58
16 ± 0.62
15 ± 0.53
13 ± 0.37
1.414

n-Hexane
16 ± 0.57
15 ± 0.48
18 ± 0.60
16 ± 0.47
14 ± 0.37
14 ± 0.36
11 ± 0.46
2.193

Chloroform
15 ± 0.53
R
13 ± 0.53
14 ± 0.64
17 ± 0.56
10 ± 0.28
10 ± 0.33
3.450

Ethyl acetate
13 ± 0.60
16 ± 0.53
17 ± 0.45
12 ± 0.32
16 ± 0.41
15 ± 0.29
15 ± 0.40
1.773

n-Butanol
11 ± 0.43
15 ± 0.52
13 ± 0.28
11 ± 0.43
15 ± 0.64
R
R
3.352

Aqueous
10 ± 0.29
R
R
R
13 ± 0.42
10 ± 0.29
11 ± 0.26
2.360

Control
Ampicillin
27 ± 0.65
25 ± 0.58
23 ± 0.46
25 ± 0.59
29 ± 0.84
26 ± 0.63
22 ± 0.67
2.463

Zone of inhibition (mm) showing sensitivity. R: no inhibition zone (resistance); ampicillin: 8 µg; : standard deviations; EC: Escherichia coli; SA: Staphylococcus aureus; BC: Bacillus cereus; PA: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; KP: Klebsiella pneumoniae; PM: Proteus mirabilis; and ECA: Erwinia carotovora.

3.2. Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activity of Heliotropium bacciferum leaves, flowers, and stem extracts was recorded against various fungal strains. All plant extracts exhibit a range of inhibitory potentials as shown in Table 2. Plant methanol, n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol extracts (15 μg) of leaves showed prominent activities against Aspergillus niger ( mm,  mm,  mm,  mm, and  mm), Aspergillus flavus ( mm,  mm,  mm,  mm, and  mm), and Aspergillus oryzae ( mm,  mm,  mm,  mm, and  mm), respectively. Plant methanol, chloroform, and n-butanol extracts (15 μg) of flowers revealed noteworthy activities against Aspergillus niger ( mm,  mm, and  mm) and Aspergillus flavus ( mm,  mm, and  mm), respectively. Significant activities were recorded by n-hexane and ethyl acetate extracts of plant flowers against Aspergillus niger ( mm and  mm), Aspergillus flavus ( mm,  mm), and Aspergillus oryzae ( mm and  mm), respectively. Methanol and chloroform extracts (15 μg) of plant stem were active against Aspergillus niger ( mm and  mm) and Aspergillus fumigatus ( mm and  mm), respectively. Excellent activities were shown by n-hexane and ethyl acetate extracts (15 μg) against Aspergillus flavus ( mm and  mm), Aspergillus oryzae ( mm and  mm), and Aspergillus fumigatus ( mm and  mm), respectively (Table 2).

Table 2: Antifungal activity of all extracts of Heliotropium bacciferum.

Plant parts
Plant extracts (µg)
Zone of inhibition (mm) ± standard error mean
St. dev

Tested fungal strains

AN
AFL
AP
AO
AF

Leaves
Methanol
17 ± 0.44
15 ± 0.38
14 ± 0.51
11 ± 0.54
R
3.899

n-Hexane
14 ± 0.52
17 ± 0.67
11 ± 0.70
16 ± 0.68
13 ± 0.53
2.387

Chloroform
12 ± 0.28
13 ± 0.53
R
16 ± 0.45
15 ± 0.49
3.507

Ethyl acetate
15 ± 0.43
17 ± 0.32
12 ± 0.46
17 ± 0.83
12 ± 0.61
2.510

n-Butanol
11 ± 0.43
14 ± 0.51
R
15 ± 0.57
10 ± 0.29
3.209

Aqueous
10 ± 0.27
R
9 ± 0.28
11 ± 0.25
R
1.789

Flowers
Methanol
14 ± 0.25
17 ± 0.63
12 ± 0.25
14 ± 0.60
11 ± 0.20
2.302

n-Hexane
17 ± 0.63
15 ± 0.48
13 ± 0.40
12 ± 0.27
15 ± 0.58
2.191

Chloroform
11 ± 0.26
14 ± 0.46
R
13 ± 0.35
11 ± 0.28
2.683

Ethyl acetate
16 ± 0.59
15 ± 0.59
11 ± 0.35
15 ± 0.44
10 ± 0.45
2.702

n-Butanol
13 ± 0.47
11 ± 0.23
R
16 ± 0.39
14 ± 0.23
3.421

Aqueous
R
12 ± 0.38
10 ± 0.31
9 ± 0.22
R
2.121

Stem
Methanol
16 ± 0.54
13 ± 0.42
15 ± 0.37
13 ± 0.48
15 ± 0.51
1.342

n-Hexane
13 ± 0.35
11 ± 0.31
16 ± 0.63
17 ± 0.54
12 ± 0.33
2.588

Chloroform
15 ± 0.54
16 ± 0.56
R
12 ± 0.27
14 ± 0.37
3.564

Ethyl acetate
12 ± 0.26
18 ± 0.50
14 ± 0.28
15 ± 0.55
16 ± 0.54
2.236

n-Butanol
15 ± 0.34
R
R
12 ± 0.26
11 ± 0.28
3.435

Aqueous
R
R
12 ± 0.22
10 ± 0.25
R
2.302

Control
Clotrimazole
24 ± 0.82
22 ± 0.87
20 ± 0.78
26 ± 0.79
22 ± 0.68
2.280

Zone of Inhibition (mm) showing sensitivity. R: no inhibition zone (resistance); clotrimazole: 8 µg; α: standard deviations; AN: Aspergillus niger; AFL: Aspergillus flavus; AP: Aspergillus parasiticus; AO: Aspergillus oryzae; and AF: Aspergillus fumigatus.

3.3. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

Heliotropium bacciferum flower extracts revealed significant antioxidant activities which are shown in Table 3. Noteworthy activities (91.58%) were recorded by control (ascorbic acid) at 225 μg/mL concentration. Plant crude extract exhibited excellent radical scavenging activities (70.12–85.75%) at all concentrations (25–225 μg/mL). Notable activities were recorded for n-hexane and n-butanol in the range of 65.47–81.14% at various dilutions. Chloroform extract showed significant antioxidant activity up to 86.34% at 225 μg/mL concentration. Ethyl acetate extract displayed excellent radical scavenging activities (71.27–88.43%) at all dilutions. Aqueous extracts (72.36%) were slightly active and revealed notable activity at higher concentrations (225 μg/mL) (Table 3).

Table 3: Antioxidant activities of flower extracts of Heliotropium bacciferum.

Plant extracts
Quantity (µg/mL), mean value ± standard deviation

Antioxidant activity (%)

25
75
125
175
225

Crude
70.73 ± 0.58
73.55 ± 0.79
75.12 ± 0.66
81.72 ± 0.82
85.75 ± 0.52

n-Hexane
65.47 ± 0.67
68.49 ± 0.48
73.86 ± 0.83
78.56 ± 0.71
80.69 ± 0.80

Chloroform
70.54 ± 0.49
74.35 ± 0.54
76.26 ± 0.70
82.78 ± 0.68
86.34 ± 0.75

Ethyl Acetate
71.27 ± 0.35
75.98 ± 0.48
77.27 ± 0.64
83.34 ± 0.59
88.27 ± 0.81

n-Butanol
66.33 ± 0.51
70.74 ± 0.62
74.47 ± 0.66
78.54 ± 0.82
81.14 ± 0.94

Aqueous
46.19 ± 0.37
58.82 ± 0.42
65.63 ± 0.73
69.33 ± 0.60
72.36 ± 0.84

Control
75.12 ± 0.42
80.92 ± 0.56
86.35 ± 0.68
88.32 ± 0.52
91.58 ± 0.83

3.4. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Compounds functional groups were examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic studies by their peak values (cm⁻¹). Alkanes, alkenes, alkyl halides, amines, carboxylic acids, amides, esters, alcohols, phenols, nitrocompounds, and aromatic compounds were identified. Amines, amides, alcohols, phenols, and alkanes showed main peaks at 3370, 3331, 2957, 2924, and 2930 cm⁻¹ (Figure 1). Different intensity peaks were identified for carboxylic acids (1717 cm⁻¹ and 1705 cm⁻¹), unsaturated esters (1728 cm⁻¹), 1° amine (1616 cm⁻¹), aromatic compounds (1464 cm⁻¹), aromatic amines (1258 cm⁻¹), aliphatic amines (1123 cm⁻¹), 1072, alkenes (1030 cm⁻¹ and 1036 cm⁻¹), and alkyl halides (808 cm⁻¹ and 866 cm⁻¹) (Tables 4–9).

Table 4: FTIR spectra of flower methanol extract of Heliotropium bacciferum.

S. number
Peak values/wave number (cm⁻¹)
Type of bond
Functional group

1
2957
C–H stretch
Alkanes

2
2930
C–H stretch
Alkanes

3
1728
C=O stretch
Esters, saturated aliphatic

4
1600
C–C stretch in ring

Aromatic compounds

5
1269
C–H wag (–CH₂X)
Alkyl halides

6
1167
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

7
1123
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

8
1070
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

9
993
=C–H bend
Alkenes

10
770
C–Cl stretch
Alkyl halides

11
743
C–Cl stretch
Alkyl halides

12
707
C–H rock
Alkanes

13
663
–C=C–H, C–H bend
Alkynes

14
631
C–Br stretch
Alkyl halides

Table 5: FTIR spectra of flower n-hexane extract of Heliotropium bacciferum.

S. number
Peak values/wave number (cm⁻¹)
Type of bond
Functional group

1
3370
N–H stretch
1°, 2° amines, amides

2
2924
C–H stretch
Alkanes

3
2853
C–H stretch
Alkanes

4
1717
C=O stretch
Carboxylic acids

5
1464
C–C stretch in ring

Aromatic compounds

6
1258
C–N stretch

Aromatic amines

7
1240
C–N stretch
Aromatic amines

8
1177
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

9
1115
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

10
1034
=C–H bend
Alkenes

11
996
O–H bend
Carboxylic Acids

12
808
C–Cl stretch
Alkyl halides

13
588
C–Br tretch
Alkyl halides

Table 6: FTIR spectra of flower chloroform extract of Heliotropium bacciferum.

S. number
Peak values/wave number (cm⁻¹)
Type of bond
Functional group

1
3331
O–H, H–bonded

Alcohols, phenols

2
2916
C–H stretch
Alkanes

3
2855
C–H stretch
Alkanes

4
1616
N–H bend
1° amines

5
1103
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

6
1047
=C–H bend
Alkenes

7
987
=C–H bend
Alkenes

8
908
N–H wag
1°, 2° amines

9
866
C–Cl stretch
Alkyl halides

Table 7: FTIR spectra of flower ethyl acetate extract of Heliotropium bacciferum.

S. number
Peak values/wave number (cm⁻¹)
Type of bond
Functional group

1
3375
O–H, H–bonded

Alcohols, phenols

2
2955
C–H stretch
Alkanes

3
2922
C–H stretch
Alkanes

5
1728
C=O stretch
α, β-unsaturated esters

6
1464
N–O symmetric stretch
Nitrocompounds

7
1259
C–N stretch

Aromatic amines

8
1123
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

9
1072
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

10
1036
=C–H bend
Alkenes

11
739
C–Cl stretch
Alkyl halides

Table 8: FTIR spectra of flower n-butanol extract of Heliotropium bacciferum.

S. number
Peak values/wave number (cm⁻¹)
Type of bond
Functional group

1
3354
O–H, H–bonded

Alcohols, phenols

2
2953
C–H stretch
Alkanes

3
2851
C–H stretch
Alkanes

4
1705
C=O stretch
Carboxylic acid

5
1466
C–C stretch in ring

Aromatic compounds

6
1271
C–N stretch

Aromatic amines

7
1209
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

8
1161
C–H wag (–CH₂X)
Alkyl halides

9
1121
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

10
1030
=C–H bend
Alkenes

Table 9: FTIR spectra of flower aqueous extract of Heliotropium bacciferum.

S. number
Peak values/wave number (cm⁻¹)
Type of bond
Functional group

1
3341
O–H, H–bonded

Alcohols, phenols

2
2924
C–H stretch
Alkanes

3
2853
C–H stretch
Alkanes

4
1732
C=O stretch
Carbonyl (aldehydes)

5
1456
N–O asymmetric stretch
Nitrocompounds

6
1049
C–N stretch
Aliphatic amines

7
908
O–H bend
Carboxylic acids

(a) FTIR spectroscopy of methanol leaves extract of Heliotropium bacciferum

(b) FTIR spectroscopy of n-hexane leaves extract of Heliotropium bacciferum

(c) FTIR spectroscopy of chloroform leaves extract of Heliotropium bacciferum

(d) FTIR spectroscopy of ethyl acetate leaves extract of Heliotropium bacciferum

(e) FTIR spectroscopy of n-butanol leaves extract of Heliotropium bacciferum

(f) FTIR spectroscopy of aqueous leaves extract of Heliotropium bacciferum

Figure 1: FTIR spectroscopy of flower (a) methanol, (b) n-hexane, (c) chloroform, (d) ethyl acetate, (e) n-butanol, and (f) aqueous extracts of Heliotropium bacciferum.

3.5. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) Bioautography

Thin layer chromatography bioautography technique is used for bioactive components isolation on TLC plates which link these compounds with the biological activities. Bioautography name is used due to the connection of TLC with the biological activities especially antimicrobial activities. Bands visualization was accomplished by ultraviolet light at 305 and 368 nm. values, inhibition of microorganism’s growth, and the active bands were found out by TLC bioautography (Tables 10 and 11). Highest values were recorded against different bacterial strains by plant leaves ethyl acetate (0.93), chloroform (0.76), and methanol (0.85) extracts at EMW, CEF, and BEA solvent systems. Aqueous and n-butanol leaves extracts were found inactive at EMW and CEF solvent systems. Plant flower methanol (0.84) and ethyl acetate (0.70) extracts revealed highest values at EMW and BEA solvent systems. Aqueous and n-hexane extracts of plant stem were found inactive, while methanol (0.84), ethyl acetate (0.70), and chloroform (0.72) showed high values against different bacterial species. Inhibition areas and values comparison was carried out against the spots on the reference plate. Active compounds in plant leaves extracts against E. coli (0.85, 0.93, and 0.76), S. aureus (0.89, 0.76, and 0.52), and B. cereus (0.73, 0.61, and 0.52) were found at different values by EMW, CEF, and BEA solvent systems. Flower extracts active compounds against P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae were found at 0.84, 0.72, 0.53, and 0.49 values. Stem extracts active compounds were also found at different values against P. mirabilis and E. carotovora (Table 10). Various values were found to be against different fungal species by plant leaves, flowers, and stem extracts at diverse solvent systems. Leaves ethyl acetate (0.82 and 0.72) and methanol (0.72 and 0.62) extracts were found active and revealed highest values against A. niger and A. flavus. Methanol (0.53, 0.64, and 0.72) and ethyl acetate (0.60 and 0.44) extracts of plant flower revealed significant values against A. parasiticus and A. oryzae. Stem chloroform (0.51), ethyl acetate (0.73 and 0.69), and aqueous (0.39) extract showed high values against A. fumigatus. Inhibition areas and values were compared with standard plate. Plant leaves, flowers, and stem active compounds were found at various values against several fungal strains (Table 11).

Table 10: Growth Inhibition on bioautographic TLC plates by Heliotropium bacciferum leaves, flowers, and stem extracts against different bacterial strains.

Plant parts
Bacterial species
Solvent system
Extracts
values
Inhibition
Active bands

Leaves
Escherichia coli
EMW
Methanol
0.62, 0.85
+++
2

n-Hexane
0.24
+
1

Chloroform
0.76
++
1

Ethyl acetate
0.93
++
1

n-Butanol
0.35, 0.54
+
2

Aqueous
−
−
−

Staphylococcus aureus
CEF
Methanol
0.89
+++
1

n-Hexane
0.52
++
1

Chloroform
0.55
+
1

Ethyl acetate
0.76
++
1

n-Butanol
−
−
−

Aqueous
0.23, 0.31
+
2

Bacillus cereus
BEA
Methanol
0.52
++
1

n-Hexane
0.47
+
1

Chloroform
0.61
++
1

Ethyl acetate
0.73
+++
1

n-Butanol
0.49
+
1

Aqueous
0.56
++
1

Flowers
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
EMW
Methanol
0.84
++
1

n-Hexane
0.67
+++
1

Chloroform
0.49
+
1

Ethyl acetate
0.72, 0.64
+++
2

n-Butanol
0.55
+
1

Aqueous
0.39
+
1

Klebsiella pneumoniae
CEF
Methanol
0.66
+
1

n-Hexane
0.53, 0.43, 0.49
++
3

Chloroform
0.71
++
1

Ethyl acetate
0.48
+
1

n-Butanol
0.67
++
1

Aqueous
−
−
−

Stem
Proteus mirabilis
BEA
Methanol
0.84
+++
1

n-Hexane
−
−
−

Chloroform
0.58
++
1

Ethyl acetate
0.70
+++
1

n-Butanol
0.28, 0.32
+
2

Aqueous
0.42
+
1

Erwinia carotovora
EMW
Methanol
0.68
++
1

n-Hexane
0.49
+
1

Chloroform
0.72, 0.69
++
2

Ethyl acetate
0.88
+++
1

n-Butanol
0.41
+
1

Aqueous
−
−
−

: retardation factor; −: inactive component; +: small inhibition; ++: moderate inhibition; and +++: high inhibition.

Table 11: Growth Inhibition on bioautographic TLC plates by Heliotropium bacciferum leaves, flowers, and stem extracts against different fungal strains.

Plant parts
Fungal species
Solvent system
Extracts
values
Inhibition
Active bands

Leaves
Aspergillus niger
EMW
Methanol
0.62
+
1

n-Hexane
0.44
++
1

Chloroform
0.38, 0.41
+
2

Ethyl acetate
0.82
+++
1

n-Butanol
0.34, 0.42
++
2

Aqueous
0.27
+
1

Aspergillus flavus
CEF
Methanol
0.72
++
1

n-Hexane
−
−
−

Chloroform
0.63
++
2

Ethyl acetate
0.70, 0.66
++
2

n-Butanol
0.43
+
1

Aqueous
0.32
++
1

Flowers
Aspergillus parasiticus
BEA
Methanol
0.53
+++
1

n-Hexane
0.47, 0.37, 0.41
++
3

Chloroform
−
−
−

Ethyl acetate
0.60
+
1

n-Butanol
0.43
++
1

Aqueous
0.38
+
1

Aspergillus oryzae
EMW
Methanol
0.64, 0.72
+++
2

n-Hexane
0.55
++
1

Chloroform
0.42
+
1

Ethyl acetate
0.44
++
1

n-Butanol
0.35
+
1

Aqueous
0.54
++
1

Stem
Aspergillus fumigatus
CEF
Methanol
0.68
++
1

n-Hexane
0.42
+
1

Chloroform
0.51
++
1

Ethyl acetate
0.73, 0.69
+++
2

n-Butanol
−
−
−

Aqueous
0.39
++
1

: retardation factor; −: inactive component; +: small inhibition; ++: moderate inhibition; and +++: high inhibition.

4. Discussion

It is evident from the results of the present study that Heliotropium bacciferum is therapeutically imperative plant species. Prominent and significant antibacterial and antifungal activities were recorded by various parts of plant extracts against antibiotic resistant microbes. Previously reported data on the antimicrobial activities of aerial parts of Heliotropium bacciferum revealed that n-hexane and ethyl acetate extracts have significant antimicrobial effects (zone of inhibition ranged from 18–30 mm) against different microorganisms. Plant fractions were active against Salmonella typhi, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Crude, aqueous, and n-butanol (2 mg/mL) extracts inhibited the growth of Trichoderma longibrachiatum, while it was inhibited by 1 mg/mL n-hexane and ethyl acetate extracts of the plant. Aspergillus flavus were inhibited by crude, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol (1 mg/mL) fractions of plant extract [12]. Plants and their extracts used in disease healing date back to 460–370 BC, when Hippocrates used drugs obtained from plants for remedial purposes [15]. In the present study, the results signified that the plant extracts inhibited the growth of different microorganisms, therefore showing that the plant extracts contained substances which can inhibit the growth of different microbes. Different researchers have also shown that the plant extracts inhibit the growth of diverse microorganisms [16]. A study reported that plant extracts antibacterial potential is mainly due to the presence of different phytochemicals [17]. Many observed that the antimicrobial effects of plant extracts are due to the presence of various secondary metabolites [16]. Traditionally, plant extracts are used in the treatment of sore, boils in the ear, wound healing, diarrhea, and control dysentery [18]. Plant extracts divulged noteworthy activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, which explore their use in the cure of bores, open wounds, and sores [19]. Staphylococcus aureus infections healing has become problematic as it has developed several mechanisms to become resistant to nearly all notorious antibiotics [20, 21]. Antibacterial activity of plant extracts against Escherichia coli justifies their use in the treatment of diarrhea and dysentery. Escherichia coli is the major reason of diarrhea and in humans other diverse diarrhoeagenic infections [22]. Phenolic compounds due to its peroxidation inhibition and scavenging of oxygen radical are vital for antioxidant activity. These compounds are significant for the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular disorders, inflammatory diseases, and aging [23]. Some phytochemicals such as flavonoids, anthocyanin, catechin, coumarin, isoflavones, flavones, isocatechin, and lignans are responsible for radical scavenging potential [24]. Previous study reported the presence of different bioactive constituents such as alkanes, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, ethers, alcohols, ketones, and amindes by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study [10]. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy has been revealed to be a significant mean for classification and differentiation of intimately relevant microbial species, plants, and other diverse organisms [25–27]. Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometric assessment showed that alkyl halides and alkanes prevalent in plant extracts contained elevated number of functional groups, which were found more significant against Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and Escherichia coli [28]. Chemical constituents of plants could yield pharmaceutically significant drugs [29].

5. Conclusion

Results of the present study revealed noteworthy antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of different parts of Heliotropium bacciferum. Plant extracts have immense potential as antibacterial and antifungal compounds against antibiotic resistant microorganisms. Therefore, they can be used in the cure of infectious diseases caused by resistant microorganisms. Alkanes, alkenes, alkyl halides, amines, carboxylic acids, amides, esters, alcohols, phenols, nitrocompounds, and aromatic compounds were identified by FTIR spectroscopic analysis. The results of this evaluation give evidence that Heliotropium bacciferum might be a promising source of phytocompounds which can be isolated and analyzed for pharmacological activities, in vitro and in vivo bioassays.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for funding the work through the research group Project no. RGP-210.

References

B. Mahesh and S. Satish, “Antimicrobial activity of some important medicinal plants against plants and human pathogens,” World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 839–843, 2008.

P. D. Abeysinghe, “Antibacterial activity of aqueous and ethanol extracts of mangrove species collected from Southern Sri Lanka,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 79–83, 2012.

R. Chandra, V. Dwivedi, K. Shivam, and A. K. Jha, “Detection of antimicrobial activity of Oscimum sanctum (Tulsi) & Trigonella foenum graecum (Methi) against some selected bacterial & fungal strains,” Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 809–813, 2011.

B. A. Iwalokun, A. Ogunledun, D. O. Ogbolu, S. B. Bamiro, and J. Jimi-Omojola, “In vitro antimicrobial properties of aqueous garlic extract against multidrug-resistant bacteria and Candida species from Nigeria,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 327–333, 2004.

S.-M. Tsao and M.-C. Yin, “In vitro antimicrobial activity of four diallyl sulphides occurring naturally in garlic and Chinese leek oils,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 646–649, 2001.

G. G. F. Nascimento, J. Locatelli, P. C. Freitas, and G. L. Silva, “Antibacterial activity of plant extracts and phytochemicals on antibiotic-resistant bacteria,” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 247–256, 2000.

S. Maleki, S. M. Seyyednejad, N. M. Damabi, and H. Motamedi, “Antibacterial activity of the fruits of Iranian Torilis leptophylla against some clinical pathogens,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1286–1289, 2008.

S. I. Ali and Y. J. Nasir, Flora of Pakistan, vol. 191, Shamim Printing Press, Karachi, Pakistan, 1983.

K. Iqbal, S. A. Nawaz, A. Malik et al., “Isolation and lipoxygenase-inhibition studies of phenolic constituents from Ehretia obtusifolia,” Chemistry and Biodiversity, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 104–111, 2005.

S. Ahmad, S. Ahmad, A. Bibi et al., “Phytochemical analysis, antioxidant activity, fatty acids composition, and functional group analysis of Heliotropium bacciferum,” Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 829076, 8 pages, 2014.

K. Murugesh, V. Yeligar, D. K. Dash, P. Sengupta, B. C. Maiti, and T. K. Maity, “Antidiabetic, antioxidant and antihyperlipidemic status of Heliotropium zeylanicum extract on streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 2202–2205, 2006.

S. Ahmad, S. Ahmad, I. Bibi et al., “Antibacterial and antifungal activities of the extract and fractions of aerial parts of Heliotropium bacciferum,” African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 32–35, 2015.

A. Rehman, F. Fatima, H. Ullah et al., “Antibacterial study of medicinal plant Trigonella foenum,” International Journal of Basic Medical Sciences and Pharmacy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–18, 2013.

M. S. Ishaq, M. M. Hussain, M. Siddique Afridi et al., “In vitro phytochemical, antibacterial, and antifungal activities of leaf, stem, and root extracts of Adiantum capillus veneris,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 269793, 7 pages, 2014.

E. A. Soforowa, Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine in Africa, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1982.

E. I. Nweze, J. I. Okafor, and O. Njoku, “Antimicrobial activities of methanolic extracts of Trema guineensis (Schumm and Thorn) and Morinda lucida Benth used in Nigerian Herbal Medicinal Practice,” Bio-Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2004.

F. A. Draughon, “Use of botanicals as bio preservatives in foods,” Food Technology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 20–28, 2004.

J. O. Igoli, T. A. Ogaji, A. Tor, and N. P. Igoli, “FTraditional medicine practice amongst the igede people of Nigeria part II,” African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 134–152, 2005.

A. I. Braude, Microbiology, W.B. Sauders Company, London, UK, 1982.

F. D. Lowy, “Medical progress: Staphylococcus aureus infections,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 8, pp. 520–532, 1998.

E. A. Morell and D. M. Balkin, “Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a pervasive pathogen highlights the need for new antimicrobial development,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 223–233, 2010.

M. R. Adams and M. O. Moss, Food Microbiology, The Royal Society of Chemisty, 1999.

G. Cioffi, M. D'Auria, A. Braca et al., “Antioxidant and free-radical scavenging activity of constituents of the leaves of Tachigalia paniculata,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1526–1529, 2002.

F. Aqil, I. Ahmad, and Z. Mehmood, “Antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties of twelve traditionally used Indian medicinal plants,” Turkish Journal of Biology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 177–183, 2006.

A. J. Das, P. Khawas, T. Miyaji, and S. C. Deka, “Phytochemical constituents, attenuated total reflectance fourier transform infrared analysis and antimicrobial activity of four plant leaves used for preparing rice beer in Assam, India,” International Journal of Food Properties, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2087–2101, 2016.

H. Lamprell, G. Mazerolles, A. Kodjo, J. F. Chamba, Y. Noël, and E. Beuvier, “Discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus strains from different species of Staphylococcus using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 125–129, 2006.

C. A. Rebuffo, J. Schmitt, M. Wenning, F. Von Stetten, and S. Scherer, “Reliable and rapid identification of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria species by artificial neural network-based fourier transform infrared spectroscopy,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 994–1000, 2006.

N. Janakiraman, S. Sahaya Sathish, and M. Johnson, “UV-VIS and FTIR spectroscopic studies on Peristrophe bicalyculata (RETZ.) Nees,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 125–129, 2011.

N. Ullah, A. Rehman, S. Ahmad et al., “Antimicrobial assay and minimum inhibitory concentration values of Cistanche tubulosa,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 380–388, 2016.